The Shambuka story is an interpolation in the original Valmiki Ramayana. This interpolation was done during Moghal era through som paid scholars of Sanskrit .. This was done to give a bad image to Hindu culture in juxtaposition of the openly crass narrative of Islaam 6:14
If Rama is embodiment of Dharma… then why he didn’t try to explain him and convince him … he was such a great embodiment of Dharma… what is this logic “if some ignorant deva will come and give a boon “ third class logic
Hari om Swamiji Lord Rama could have advised Shambuka accordingly if he was not eligible to do Tapas. Lord Krishna had made it clesr that there are no caste by birth, people are segregated by their actions. Doing Tapas is an action that elevates an individual from his state of Sudra to that of Brahamana. So Lord Rama should have appreciated Shambuka & protected him. Rama's action of killing somebody for doing penance cannot be appreciated nor tolerated. It is a contradiction of what lord krishna spoke about " GUNA KARMA VIBHAKA & CHATURVARNYAM".
Very good Tactics… Escape by saying this was added in Appendix..or Addendum or something else … if this is true !!! Then the whole book becomes questionable… because it is also a written document
Ooom sambuka swamy nama:🙏🙏🙏🙏i know what was that universal principle... It was chathurvarnya 😂😂😂😂.. No wonder.. Rama did adharma to his wife... My mam sitamatha...😢😢😢
That's his intention and his own opinion what to do and what not to do. And society and rama had no loss by this. This is completely wrong if rama had done this
Swamiji, Sambuga did what he wanted, whether fruitful or fruitles. Rama, being the king would have advised Sambuga or ordered him to stop the foolish act instead of killing him.
Hari Om Swamiji Further Rama's action of deserting Sita & sending her into the jungle merely listening to a Laundry Man's comments on her character is also very much immature on the part of Lord Rama. Seetha had already proved her chastity in front of Rama, by entering into the fire & came out unscathed. Lord Rama was a witness to it. It was his duty to have convinced the insipid Laundry man & his subjects about the incomparable greatness of seetha. Instead like a coward he got carried away by the unfounded rumours of an insignificant & ignorant man & carried out the cruel action of sending his dear & loyal Wife into the jungle especially when she was pregnant & he was 100 percent convinced of Seetha's innocense. He spoiled his own life & the happiness of his royal family as well as his subjects. Nothing appreciable about Lord Rama's above two deeds.
@@Patr600 Are you talking about the Arabian imposter prophet ? He was poisoned aur haan ji sahi hua uske saath kitne logo ko marwaya tha slave bhi bana Diya tha
In these days better we can say as you said... Otherwise others may criticize Hindus... If anybody ask we can say these are prsthyuktha.😊 Only Birla wall care putty can beat Swamiji😂😂
Ram never killed shambugha and ram never send sita to forest these are all comes in uttar Ramayana which is later interpolation. Uttar ramayana is not a part of valmiki ramayan. Orginal ramayana(valmiki ramayan) ends in yudha kanda. We should be proud of Ram🕉️ unlike Prophets of semetic religions ram never had slave woman like muhammad or abraham etc.....
As a christian i never accepted mohamed as a prophet he was alway a liar and a deceiver. Secondly alot of semitic prophets not only dont have servants but also have no money or shelter. Elijah, isaiah, Yohanam(john the baptist), and these prophets speak against the authorities who opposed people right and lead them astrayed and eventually got killed
Yes it was..end of story
Due to discrimination and caste system in sanatan religious people converting other religious
Pranams ACHARYA SWAMIJ🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻
Hari Om
The Shambuka story is an interpolation in the original Valmiki Ramayana. This interpolation was done during Moghal era through som paid scholars of Sanskrit .. This was done to give a bad image to Hindu culture in juxtaposition of the openly crass narrative of Islaam 6:14
If Rama is embodiment of Dharma… then why he didn’t try to explain him and convince him … he was such a great embodiment of Dharma… what is this logic “if some ignorant deva will come and give a boon “ third class logic
Raman ambassador of the caste system
🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏
just like muslims justifying, ayesha and mohammed nikah
Hari om Swamiji
Lord Rama could have advised Shambuka accordingly if he was not eligible to do Tapas. Lord Krishna had made it clesr that there are no caste by birth, people are segregated by their actions. Doing Tapas is an action that elevates an individual from his state of Sudra to that of Brahamana. So Lord Rama should have appreciated Shambuka & protected him. Rama's action of killing somebody for doing penance cannot be appreciated nor tolerated.
It is a contradiction of what lord krishna spoke about " GUNA KARMA VIBHAKA & CHATURVARNYAM".
There are some stuff that not represent my ideology in Hinduism so I consider myself as an atheist ⚛️
Very good Tactics… Escape by saying this was added in Appendix..or Addendum or something else … if this is true !!! Then the whole book becomes questionable… because it is also a written document
Ooom sambuka swamy nama:🙏🙏🙏🙏i know what was that universal principle... It was chathurvarnya 😂😂😂😂.. No wonder.. Rama did adharma to his wife... My mam sitamatha...😢😢😢
That's his intention and his own opinion what to do and what not to do. And society and rama had no loss by this. This is completely wrong if rama had done this
Swamiji, Sambuga did what he wanted, whether fruitful or fruitles. Rama, being the king would have advised Sambuga or ordered him to stop the foolish act instead of killing him.
Hari Om Swamiji
Further Rama's action of deserting Sita & sending her into the jungle merely listening to a Laundry Man's comments on her character is also very much immature on the part of Lord Rama. Seetha had already proved her chastity in front of Rama, by entering into the fire & came out unscathed. Lord Rama was a witness to it. It was his duty to have convinced the insipid Laundry man & his subjects about the incomparable greatness of seetha. Instead like a coward he got carried away by the unfounded rumours of an insignificant & ignorant man & carried out the cruel action of sending his dear & loyal Wife into the jungle especially when she was pregnant & he was 100 percent convinced of Seetha's innocense. He spoiled his own life & the happiness of his royal family as well as his subjects. Nothing appreciable about Lord Rama's above two deeds.
Ram was a normal king , why people believe he is a god , he had not equality, he was a servant of bhramin , and bhramin always dominated to sudra
Idiot spotted.
Since the age of Rama all the rakshasa except one or two have not been realising that Rama was not a normal king😂
What if a shudra killed Rama and justified according to logic of shudra saying shudras are Gods and can do anything?
Krishna was killed by a tribal hunter was he not ?
@@mosinnagant2552vo to usne bilkul thik kia ek esa insan ko mar dia jisne kitna log ko marvaya yudh mai
@@Patr600 Are you talking about the Arabian imposter prophet ? He was poisoned aur haan ji sahi hua uske saath kitne logo ko marwaya tha slave bhi bana Diya tha
@@mosinnagant2552no i am talking about Krishna
In these days better we can say as you said... Otherwise others may criticize Hindus... If anybody ask we can say these are prsthyuktha.😊 Only Birla wall care putty can beat Swamiji😂😂
Ram never killed shambugha and ram never send sita to forest these are all comes in uttar Ramayana which is later interpolation. Uttar ramayana is not a part of valmiki ramayan. Orginal ramayana(valmiki ramayan) ends in yudha kanda.
We should be proud of Ram🕉️
unlike Prophets of semetic religions ram never had slave woman like muhammad or abraham etc.....
As a christian i never accepted mohamed as a prophet he was alway a liar and a deceiver. Secondly alot of semitic prophets not only dont have servants but also have no money or shelter. Elijah, isaiah, Yohanam(john the baptist), and these prophets speak against the authorities who opposed people right and lead them astrayed and eventually got killed
Later? why didn't they rid off from ramayan
U people believe he's god 😂
Thoo
Fraud man become swami😅😅