Yes, there are a good amount of extra organization that adds weight and isn’t necessary, but this paid is COMFORTABLE. Been using it for 5 years and there’s no wear. People hate on osprey for many reasons, but this pack just will not die and I have zero plans on getting a new pack for years.
I have the Atmos AG50 it's the perfect size for urban backpacking and going on airlines and it's super comfortable. I just wish it wasn't primarily a top loader
@@sianachMost backpacks these days have side access options. In fact, they even changed the Atmos AG to have side loading options. So, no, you are not stuck with top loading. Many flay completely open from the side.
@@geometerfpv2804 yeah my aether 70 has access from the ?back? (bit opposite your back idk) i mostly still use the topload tho bc it means i can stack stuff and compress it much better which means i can fit more in as well as balance the weight in it better too
I spent weeks reading reviews before making a decision on a backpack. I bought this bag and the mystery ranch Bridger 65. The Bridger is hands down a far better bag. It’s not that much more expensive either. Try them both and I’ll bet you’ll go with the Bridger as well.
If you need that much volume you made serious mistakes on your other gear/ you are carrying way too many items. Further it is quite heavy. Great for work and travel and such but not for hiking.
Nonsense, tens of thousands of people use this pack for backpacking...people love to hate on it because it's so popular. Get over yourself. 65 liters is the recommended "new backpacker" starting point. People don't start out with a ton of UL gear. I also think it's hilarious that people think a 4 ish lb pack is "heavy" and a 2 ish lb pack is "ultra light" when you're carrying like 35 lbs of gear...hardly makes a big difference...
@@geometerfpv2804 Video states: "#1 Bast Hiking Backpack For Long Treks!" I just said it is not. Never have I said it's a bad pack or you can't use it for that matter. If you do manage to fill a pack that size, you are carrying to much. Started with a 65 l pack as well when I hiked the TA a couple of years ago and yes, it's heavy, and a ton of space to fill up with unnecessary stuff.
![[UA] Team Vitality проти NAVI | IEM Cologne 2024](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/wttO1zVRTC0/mqdefault.jpg)
Anti gravity has the same ring to it as military grade
Yes, there are a good amount of extra organization that adds weight and isn’t necessary, but this paid is COMFORTABLE. Been using it for 5 years and there’s no wear. People hate on osprey for many reasons, but this pack just will not die and I have zero plans on getting a new pack for years.
I have the Atmos AG50 it's the perfect size for urban backpacking and going on airlines and it's super comfortable. I just wish it wasn't primarily a top loader
Ag50 you put in the cabin or baggage?
not much you can do about it toploading when its designed for backpacking 😅
@@sianachMost backpacks these days have side access options. In fact, they even changed the Atmos AG to have side loading options. So, no, you are not stuck with top loading. Many flay completely open from the side.
@@geometerfpv2804 yeah my aether 70 has access from the ?back? (bit opposite your back idk) i mostly still use the topload tho bc it means i can stack stuff and compress it much better which means i can fit more in as well as balance the weight in it better too
This is currently(June 2024) $337.84. Just so you know. And I only see 208 reviews given.
I have one . I must say it's every thing one could want in a great and durable pack.❤
The ag50 is in my opinion better for hiking, the 65 is a bit to big.
I spent weeks reading reviews before making a decision on a backpack. I bought this bag and the mystery ranch Bridger 65. The Bridger is hands down a far better bag. It’s not that much more expensive either. Try them both and I’ll bet you’ll go with the Bridger as well.
How much tho
@@tylerroskam2110 $375
Aether i think is better imo
Way better
I love osprey ,sallamm pendaki dr Indonesia,kerenn hbs dipakaii enakk melluk baget
pake type apa bang ? beli dimana ya ?
@@meandinsightnah info juga dong
I love this ceril
Atmos wasnt the thing for me. The gravity mesh on the back was touching my skin in a way that It was annoying to walk with
Watch their sizing....youll likely to need smaller than their own measurements.
I got the atmos ag lt 65 ltr last weekend for the bargain price of £40 delivered brand new with tags to my door from chain reaction uk.
I don’t love it. Flash 55 is my newest pack and I’m really love that one.
My dream 🙂
very good
Gregory Baltoro 65
👌👌
I own this pack and it's way too heavy for a thru hike.
If you think it’s bad now, just wait till you load it with 20 pounds of gear. You won’t last a mile.
Jokes aside, what pack would you recommend?
@@jeromebullard6123 i hiked the full dix range with it and a bear can... i know lol
@@jeromebullard6123 i would go for a ULA circuit
You know they server thru hikers and this is the 3rd most common behind osprey exos and ula circuit...
Is a sexy pack 😎
Honestly it’s ok and a piece of trash at the same time.
$700
$289😂
2599RMB😭
модель 2023 року отримала багато змін і перетворилась на лайно😮
If you need that much volume you made serious mistakes on your other gear/ you are carrying way too many items. Further it is quite heavy. Great for work and travel and such but not for hiking.
Not everyone is the same size. Whats too heavy for a 120lb girl is light for a 220lb man.
Nonsense, tens of thousands of people use this pack for backpacking...people love to hate on it because it's so popular. Get over yourself. 65 liters is the recommended "new backpacker" starting point. People don't start out with a ton of UL gear.
I also think it's hilarious that people think a 4 ish lb pack is "heavy" and a 2 ish lb pack is "ultra light" when you're carrying like 35 lbs of gear...hardly makes a big difference...
@@geometerfpv2804 Video states: "#1 Bast Hiking Backpack For Long Treks!" I just said it is not. Never have I said it's a bad pack or you can't use it for that matter. If you do manage to fill a pack that size, you are carrying to much. Started with a 65 l pack as well when I hiked the TA a couple of years ago and yes, it's heavy, and a ton of space to fill up with unnecessary stuff.