Northrop Grumman Redesigns Drone Into High-Tech Manned Jet

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 лис 2024
  • The first known prototype of the Model 437, developed by Northrop Grumman's subsidiary Scaled Composites, has successfully taken flight. Initially conceptualized as an advanced "loyal wingman" air combat drone, this design has been in development since at least 2021. However, the recent emergence of this prototype, equipped with a cockpit, adds an intriguing twist. #fighterjet #aircarft #wingman #drone

КОМЕНТАРІ • 128

  • @F15ElectricEagle
    @F15ElectricEagle Місяць тому +32

    Northrup Grumman always builds some of the most radically beautiful jets in the world, e.g. the YF-23 Blackwidow II, the B-2 Spirit, the X-29, and of course,... The F-14 Tomcat.

    • @ryanc00p3r3
      @ryanc00p3r3 Місяць тому +1

      let's not forget the B-21 Raider.

    • @F15ElectricEagle
      @F15ElectricEagle Місяць тому

      @@ryanc00p3r3 - I left the B-21 Raider out as I was referring only to physical appearance, of which I feel the B-21 was basically covered by the B-2.

    • @SmoggyFroggy
      @SmoggyFroggy Місяць тому

      The Tomcat was the greatest piece of machinery ever produced; it can be considered nothing short of an absolute masterpiece.

  • @patkelley4071
    @patkelley4071 2 місяці тому +68

    Looks like a low cost stealth aircraft looking for customers.

    • @wilba4ce-ichiban
      @wilba4ce-ichiban 2 місяці тому +7

      R&D, experimentation in manufacturing, construction delivery reduction, digital design experimentation…etc. If you get into a war you will need to maintain high tech, experienced manufacturers and manufacturing facilities to continue to build and replace lost weapons during wartime and in peacetime. “If you want peace, prepare for war”. Also prepares the manufacturer to be prepared for the RFP that comes out in terms of competitive advantage.

    • @alamy313
      @alamy313 2 місяці тому +2

      Looks promising but some things look unfinished so you're right its an early prototype.

    • @garcxonfirman9106
      @garcxonfirman9106 2 місяці тому +2

      More than good looking aircraft

    • @Ni-coMargaret
      @Ni-coMargaret Місяць тому +3

      私も同じ事を思いました

    • @Jackson-Sean
      @Jackson-Sean Місяць тому +1

      It is this mentality that leads to building expensive and ineffective things in the West

  • @TheNefastor
    @TheNefastor Місяць тому +15

    It's starting to look like all future aircraft will come in manned and unmanned variants.

    • @dmitrytoushe4533
      @dmitrytoushe4533 Місяць тому

      Что мешает сделать пеилотируемые и беспелотные одновгеменно, в одном изделии?

  • @Forevertrue
    @Forevertrue 2 місяці тому +12

    3000 mile range, Wow. Looks like it's suited for recon. Small also makes for stealthy.

  • @catsupchutney
    @catsupchutney 2 місяці тому +13

    This might be the way to accomplish raid lower cost iterative design. Test as a drone, then enhance as necessary for a human pilot.

    • @brianboye8025
      @brianboye8025 2 місяці тому +5

      I believe the human pilot is just to allow easier testing, as noted in the video. There is no possible reason to have a manned capacity in a craft like this.

    • @bertkreft9689
      @bertkreft9689 Місяць тому

      sounds true but sad...​@@brianboye8025

  • @SPak-rt2gb
    @SPak-rt2gb Місяць тому +2

    Front looks like Bird of Prey

  • @matthewferguson3922
    @matthewferguson3922 2 місяці тому +6

    OV10 Bronco replacement aircraft to contain missile jamming suite and site painting to allow advanced fighters to destroy enemy missile sites.

  • @OzcarMike641
    @OzcarMike641 2 місяці тому +3

    i always thought that drone would be a cool manned craft

  • @DJAYPAZ
    @DJAYPAZ Місяць тому +2

    This was always going to happen. The merging of unmanned drones and cockpit piloted military aircraft creates the opportunity for new tactics, additional resource deployment options, even force multiplier benefits. Opponent forces won't know if they are facing drones or piloted aircraft.

  • @dsmoke1972
    @dsmoke1972 2 місяці тому +4

    Looks like a light fighter to me. 3000m range is insane. Rear looks a little like the YF-23.

  • @PomahXomehko
    @PomahXomehko 2 місяці тому +4

    Ukrainians are pushing ACE-1 drone but has a higher thrust to this model 437 the British, French and Ukrainians going forward. Just yesterday Ukraine used it's 1000Km ballistic missile doing a lot of damage in Russia.

  • @YouTube_user3333
    @YouTube_user3333 2 місяці тому +2

    RQ9
    I always looked at that and said, upsize it and you’ve got a very affordable, stealth, piloted aircraft.
    No surprise that someone had the same thought, with turning a drone into a manned aircraft.

  • @mansurazeez2229
    @mansurazeez2229 2 місяці тому +5

    Air intake looks like that of the F-107 Ultra Sabre!

    • @bryanst.martin7134
      @bryanst.martin7134 Місяць тому

      Don't throw it away unless it's totally useless! Like the B2 Spirit idea lingered long enough to be viable.

  • @emptyscreen6945
    @emptyscreen6945 2 місяці тому +17

    The design of engine mounted on fuselage is like heinkel he 162 but stealthy

  • @Sacto1654
    @Sacto1654 Місяць тому +1

    This is the next-generation stealth technology demonstrator. It will be used to test new stealth technologies for drones.

  • @rabidL3M0NS
    @rabidL3M0NS Місяць тому +1

    Interesting, usually you expect to see manned aircraft modified to be unmanned not the other way around.

  • @RenzCarlTampus
    @RenzCarlTampus Місяць тому

    Adding SVTOL and a red paint job makes it the perfect private aircraft

  • @MrKhoirulyaqin
    @MrKhoirulyaqin Місяць тому +2

    Speeeed.... Loks like 🐌🐌🐌🐌🐌🐌

  • @tsclly2377
    @tsclly2377 2 місяці тому +2

    done so for programming for the drone.. they should also do a two seater (trainer).

  • @bertkreft9689
    @bertkreft9689 Місяць тому

    very interesting concept 👍 light - stelth - long range drone - with onboard pilot option

  • @cujimmy1366
    @cujimmy1366 Місяць тому

    Fantastic way to extract Agents from the field.

  • @simonpkershaw
    @simonpkershaw 2 місяці тому +3

    What an interesting aircraft & suite of technologies that could do for military aircraft what Burt Rutans ideas have done for light commercial aircraft.
    I’m also really struck with the similarity of look and layout to the German WWII Heinkel He 162 Volksjäge

  • @ryanchan270
    @ryanchan270 2 місяці тому +3

    Northrop Grumman *loses F35 joint strike fighter program*
    US Military: You just focus on stealth bomber, stealth fighters belongs to Lockheed Martin
    Northrop Grumman: oh... nah we ain't making stealth fighters anymore, we're just making a stealth wingman drone that happens to requires a pilot with strike fighter capabilities. Would you be interested?

    • @bigearl3867
      @bigearl3867 Місяць тому +3

      Did you know that Northrop Gruman produces the aircraft's center fuselage, AN/APG-81 AESA radar, communications subsystems and provides sustainment support for the EODAS. for the F-35?

  • @andreww1225
    @andreww1225 2 місяці тому +9

    Just build NGAD

  • @MrRossi1805
    @MrRossi1805 Місяць тому +5

    Talking in circles, repeating so many phrases with an robotic automated voice….

  • @unclewerner
    @unclewerner Місяць тому +1

    Looks more like someone needs a nutrition and exercise program at Grumman.

  • @controllerplayer1720
    @controllerplayer1720 Місяць тому

    i have my own design being drawn on a calendar..

  • @danuusahani4029
    @danuusahani4029 Місяць тому +1

    It looks like a trainer...

  • @lokesh303101
    @lokesh303101 Місяць тому +1

    Yes!

  • @LWJCarroll
    @LWJCarroll Місяць тому +1

    Scaled Composites, wasnt this Burt Rutans business in the past? Laurie. NZ. 😊

  • @wooden2187
    @wooden2187 2 місяці тому +2

    So… it goes from non pressurised drone to pressurised jet and there’s 1% changes?

  • @Sir_Gugharde_Wuglis
    @Sir_Gugharde_Wuglis Місяць тому +2

    Cool. Can it bite? Seems like a really light fighter.

  • @gonebabygone4116
    @gonebabygone4116 2 місяці тому +3

    So this is basically ripped from the TWZ article on this plane?

  • @diGritz1
    @diGritz1 2 місяці тому +2

    Any ideas when you will be accepting deposits? How about trade-ins?
    My 152 is a bit long in the tooth and this will be a nice upgrade. "0_o"

  • @KA4UPW
    @KA4UPW Місяць тому +1

    What we need are 10k's of cheap drones like Ukraine uses

  • @GauntletKI
    @GauntletKI Місяць тому

    Looks like the being quiet bird... With a bit of bird of prey

  • @bret9741
    @bret9741 Місяць тому +1

    It’s not the ugliest prototype, Boeing has that with the X-35.
    If a company wants to be truly successful selling fighter / attack or any kind of aircraft they really should figure out how to achieve the performance they want while at the same time making an appealing looking aircraft. It can be a good ugly like the A-10, the wicked mean look of the F-4, or the gorgeous lines of the F-15. The point is the US seems to have engineers that have lost the art of making truly inspiring looking aircraft. For example. Look at the T-38 vs the new T-7. The T-38 is gorgeous in the air and on the ground. It performance and service to many nations has been exceptional. The T-7’s canopy, fuselage forward of the windscreen seems stunted.. almost cartoonish. It’s not terrible but sigh just a little care on the looks side, the T-7 could have been amazing as both a trainer and affordable fighter attack platform.
    One more example, F-16. This small fighter has turned head a from the day it rolled out with its YF-16 red white and blue paint. It generates a visceral response that quickly turns to intellectual awe at its aggressive looks and jaw dropping performance. Now compare the F-16 or F-15 to the F-35 or F-22. They just look better, even though the F-35 and F-22 are not horrible by any means. It’s just the designers focused solely on capabilities, which is fine… I get it. But since these aircraft are so expensive and we keep them for 40-50 years… why not have an internal competition among the engineering teams to not only achieve the performance but do so in a genuinely beautiful to the eye design.

  • @mainaunt4447
    @mainaunt4447 Місяць тому

    Good for training

  • @H.P206
    @H.P206 Місяць тому +1

    looks like the bid of prey

    • @mjeffn2
      @mjeffn2 Місяць тому

      LOL. That’s quite a pun, if that’s what you intended. Bravo.

  • @robertg786
    @robertg786 Місяць тому +2

    What's it top speed?

    • @mill2712
      @mill2712 Місяць тому

      Mach .8 or 615 mph/987 kph.
      On Sandboxx's channel.

  • @motomech83
    @motomech83 Місяць тому

    it looks like the bird of prey concept. many years ago

  • @WilliamWhitneyChristmasMD
    @WilliamWhitneyChristmasMD Місяць тому

    “Well, we decided it does need a pilot after all.” 😅🤷‍♂️ - Northrop Grumman

  • @appleblows1
    @appleblows1 Місяць тому

    What's the advantage of being manned over the unmanned version? Why would one buy it over the unmanned?

  • @johnmay6090
    @johnmay6090 Місяць тому

    Still wondering why the tail planes are so big?

  • @Sierra-208
    @Sierra-208 2 місяці тому +1

    I want to know what weapons can be strapped to it

  • @tu_alum5619
    @tu_alum5619 2 місяці тому +1

    Given the drone/autonomous background of the design, is the pilot considered an "observer"?

  • @patel.k0
    @patel.k0 Місяць тому +1

    Is this a drone or fighter jet ? please tell me what the difference is if you are putting the man in it.

    • @patel.k0
      @patel.k0 Місяць тому +1

      Son of F-16. Brilliant.

  • @Dawar55
    @Dawar55 Місяць тому

    I want one

  • @junkerpain251
    @junkerpain251 2 місяці тому +2

    im prety sure this is just a prototype looking for funding.

    • @brianboye8025
      @brianboye8025 2 місяці тому +2

      How about a prototype being developed by a significant defense company? Too simple? Scaled Composites has been doing this since Burt Rutan formed them. They are now part of NG.

  • @r1cmaf
    @r1cmaf Місяць тому +2

    What a revolutionnary design, the new He162 Salamander 🙂

    • @AtlanteanWanderer
      @AtlanteanWanderer Місяць тому

      We think alike. Good point. I would say an He-162 C.

  • @stephenmorbley297
    @stephenmorbley297 2 місяці тому +1

    It looks like Karp won't be doing business with Putin's Russia. He must feel terrible (wink).

  • @rubiconklbrutorowman7577
    @rubiconklbrutorowman7577 Місяць тому +1

    Did not state speed for manned aircraft!

    • @mill2712
      @mill2712 Місяць тому

      However, Sandbox did and it's around mach .8 or 615 mph. (987 kph)
      The cruising speed of an F-35A.

  • @timharris8140
    @timharris8140 Місяць тому

    How many times did you show the same clip? Over and over and over and over..

  • @louisbabycos106
    @louisbabycos106 2 місяці тому +3

    Low cost stealth ?

    • @Forevertrue
      @Forevertrue 2 місяці тому +4

      A recon and observer with that range.

  • @alexprost7505
    @alexprost7505 2 місяці тому +1

    ultra tucano

  • @bobermord0r733
    @bobermord0r733 Місяць тому

    Why? To reduce payload?

  • @MzamoMehlomakhulu
    @MzamoMehlomakhulu Місяць тому

    Can you export to south Africa

  • @UncleRayRayGarageEmporium
    @UncleRayRayGarageEmporium Місяць тому +3

    Do you listen to your AI narrator before you publish? Obviously not. I unsubscribed from other channels for being so unprofessional. Do better, please.

  • @edlee8949
    @edlee8949 2 місяці тому +1

    The bulk look of the Vee tail kills everything. It makes the plane look so clumsy.

  • @bruhbroseph
    @bruhbroseph Місяць тому

    Unmanned didnt pan out huh?😅

  • @joseenriquesandoval6698
    @joseenriquesandoval6698 Місяць тому

    Mentalidad de viejo, los drones deben ser pequeños y no esa bestia

  • @conantheagrarian
    @conantheagrarian Місяць тому

    Stealthy for whom? who’s flying this thing and why do they need stealth?

  • @User-vbhhnvgjmt
    @User-vbhhnvgjmt Місяць тому +4

    I don't get it, what this function for. It is useless, it can't carried heavy missile, can not doing jet fighter manuveur, not even can be a kamikaze drone, not even suitable for be spy plane, it only suitable for training exercise plane.

    • @2013fordmustanggt
      @2013fordmustanggt 3 дні тому

      Range is an issue today and cost. The NGAD fighter won't outmaneuver the F-22 because range and payload are more qualifying factors for the next aircraft.

  • @undertow2142
    @undertow2142 2 місяці тому +1

    Of course they will do this. It saves them money and maximizes profit to develop this in addition to the drone. Sunk cost and good business practice to diversify products at cheapest cost.

  • @デデザイン
    @デデザイン Місяць тому

    The Chinese military was scared to tears

  • @spmadeinusa4594
    @spmadeinusa4594 2 місяці тому +2

    Drone interceptor.

  • @BG-gk6jf
    @BG-gk6jf Місяць тому

    Yeah War! Yah Tax Dollars!

  • @Anni3sgotagun
    @Anni3sgotagun Місяць тому

    CIA Jet

  • @JustaPilot1
    @JustaPilot1 2 місяці тому +1

    Ok folks, proof of concept, hence the cockpit. That's what Scaled does best. Also, smaller than the real deal will be.

  • @amielem
    @amielem Місяць тому +1

    Low cost images lol

  • @conantheagrarian
    @conantheagrarian Місяць тому

    this is the music Zelenskyy listened to when he ordered Kursk. Then every one died. Hilary cackle

  • @jaysonpida5379
    @jaysonpida5379 2 місяці тому +1

    So they can take a drone and do this with it but the the program to get a replacement jet trainer for the T-38 grinds on and on and on.... Ahhh the wonderful MIC doing its best to exploit more money out of the taxpayer.
    Quiet the engine noise a little bit more and this would make an acceptable, CREWED, stealthy CAS recon and light attack platform.
    Hey start cranking out a stripped 'drone' version and give them to Ukraine....they'll put it through a rigorous training program for ya !!

  • @ChamplainDivision
    @ChamplainDivision 2 місяці тому +1

    I swear, show me that file footage ONE MORE TIME, and I'll...I'll.....Dislike you!

  • @jimmycalifornia5872
    @jimmycalifornia5872 29 днів тому

    Fat girl little jet will it get off the ground?

  • @robertlackey7212
    @robertlackey7212 Місяць тому +1

    Structually inefficent and ugly.

  • @FLORIDIANMILLIONAIRE
    @FLORIDIANMILLIONAIRE 2 місяці тому +1

    I buy that for a dollar!

  • @philipcarter8511
    @philipcarter8511 2 місяці тому +1

    What's with those huge rectangular tail surfaces?

    • @RansumMusic
      @RansumMusic 2 місяці тому +4

      they're called vertical stabilizers

    • @LostAnFound
      @LostAnFound 2 місяці тому +5

      My guess is they help increase payload capability in spite of the really short, highly tapered, high aspect ratio main wing by increasing overall wing area AND allowing better control with a more efficient, aft CG.

  • @patty.sss.1039
    @patty.sss.1039 Місяць тому +1

    รูปแบบไม่ล่ำยุก

  • @Amen6magi
    @Amen6magi 2 місяці тому +1

    Look like stealth Sprayer plane😂

  • @rgloria40
    @rgloria40 2 місяці тому +1

    I could see some very old programs of the 1980's to 1990's from Northrop Tacit Blue to Boeing Bird of Prey. I see Lockheed Martin stealth fuseloge... A hogpogs of young engineers fighting against the ANTI digital design old farts of aerospace....Pretty soon we will be casted out like every generation before... Growing old sucks huh.

  • @conantheagrarian
    @conantheagrarian Місяць тому

    zelensky escape vehicle.

  • @cratecruncher4974
    @cratecruncher4974 2 місяці тому +1

    Take a highly maneuverable airframe capable of autonomous flight and change it to rely on a slow, 180 pound bag of water that will split open at 4 x gravity.

  • @bussi7859
    @bussi7859 2 місяці тому +1

    Crap

  • @seventian6117
    @seventian6117 Місяць тому

    This thing looks: cheap, haha

  • @MacDa-yy8xn
    @MacDa-yy8xn 2 місяці тому +1

    Why on earth would you put a man in a stealth aircraft. It defeats the whole purpose of the drone. Stupid people trying to make a buck.
    Not going to find a single person that can spend 30 plus hours in the air. Plus now you have another person in harms way.

  • @GigiolaCinquetty
    @GigiolaCinquetty 2 місяці тому +1

    It looks like a step Back from the futuristic bird of prey ... which is alreqdy +/_18 years old

  • @TheRMKII
    @TheRMKII Місяць тому

    I want one....

  • @yourshomearchitect.8702
    @yourshomearchitect.8702 2 місяці тому +1

    koi nhi milega