Ukraine: ATACMS long-range missiles from the US have arrived | DW News

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 жов 2023
  • It took almost a year for US president Joe Biden to make the decision, but a month after he at last promised to deliver ATACMS long-range missiles to Ukraine, the weapons have now arrived. Our correspondent Mathias Bölinger has more on the missile system's capabilities.
    #ukraine #russia #missile
    Subscribe: ua-cam.com/users/deutsche...
    For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
    Follow DW on social media:
    ►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
    ►Twitter: / dwnews
    ►Instagram: / dwnews
    ►Twitch: / dwnews_hangout
    Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch

КОМЕНТАРІ • 958

  • @Mahbu
    @Mahbu 7 місяців тому +357

    What isn't being talked about is the ATACMs is an OLD weapon system the US is in the process of phasing out. We don't produce anymore. Basically, we're getting rid of them in favor of the Precision Strike Missile (or PrSM). According to wikipedia and other sources, the PrSM is scheduled for initial operational capability in 2023. I suspect one reason we were so reluctant to give ATACMS, aside from a fear of escalation, is our PrSM wasn't yet ready. My guess is the PrSM system is now being produced or prepared in sufficient numbers that we are satisfied in emptying our ATACMS inventory to make room and save money.

    • @hape3862
      @hape3862 7 місяців тому +49

      That's _exactly_ what I heard a few months ago, that they were waiting for PrSM to be delivered so they could safely retire the ATACMs (= give them to Ukraine).

    • @mfundomkhonta7500
      @mfundomkhonta7500 7 місяців тому +51

      Being old means nothing,it's works,for Ukraine it's new cz they never had one

    • @artistalexanderrobbie
      @artistalexanderrobbie 7 місяців тому +17

      Win win

    • @MsJuggaletteforever1
      @MsJuggaletteforever1 7 місяців тому

      AmericanN****** can't deliver. First few sentences.

    • @jafarbanda1847
      @jafarbanda1847 7 місяців тому +6

      You’re correct!

  • @untouchable360x
    @untouchable360x 7 місяців тому +120

    Not just a missile. It's a "special military projectile."

  • @hape3862
    @hape3862 7 місяців тому +185

    Can we please take a moment to appreciate that DW refrained from using the term "Game changer" in the title?

    • @Jakedelus
      @Jakedelus 7 місяців тому +27

      no need for any "game changer" ukraine wipe orcs airfield with old tech missile when orcs air defence cant do anything. all so orcs are doing so nice human waves in avdiivca so its hard to miss. where is your game changer armata ? oh i forgot it stalled on parade.

    • @lrrrruleroftheplanetomicro6881
      @lrrrruleroftheplanetomicro6881 7 місяців тому +10

      Well, if they call 20 missiles that arrived a year late a "game changer", reasonable people might go to their studio and slap them silly.

    • @cuc6410
      @cuc6410 7 місяців тому +5

      😂😂 well I noticed that 😅😅😅😅

    • @larrymunn5279
      @larrymunn5279 7 місяців тому +6

      Not a fan of sensationalist headlines? Me either lol. My mom always used to roll her eyes and note journalists would repeatedly use the term "historic" or "greatest ever" sometimes on the same topic repeatedly, back to back.

    • @havanasyndrome3024
      @havanasyndrome3024 7 місяців тому +10

      ​@@Jakedelushow is your counteroffensive going?
      😂😂😂
      You gained a negative 300 mi2 since it started 😂

  • @seanbrown701
    @seanbrown701 7 місяців тому +29

    2,500 ATACMS is not limited. The only limit is the number supplied and used each month. These change the game entirely.

    • @christopherlees1134
      @christopherlees1134 7 місяців тому +2

      These are not the long range 300 km ATACMS though. For instance, they can't hit the Kerch straight bridge in Crimea.

    • @nczioox1116
      @nczioox1116 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@christopherlees1134 attacking weapons depots and airfields takes priority over the bridge right now anyways

  • @billcook7285
    @billcook7285 7 місяців тому +122

    The missiles used in this strike were made in 1996.
    Can you imagine what we've got now? 😉

    • @ZaineKnight
      @ZaineKnight 7 місяців тому +13

      Exactly

    • @edwinsiala3373
      @edwinsiala3373 7 місяців тому +9

      You guys are delusional.

    • @Jakedelus
      @Jakedelus 7 місяців тому +26

      and still orcs air defence didnt catch it :D Just imagine usa overpower with current weapons. it would not event be war, it would be just even bigger humiliation than what ukraine is doing to russia right now.

    • @oleksii000
      @oleksii000 7 місяців тому +30

      @@edwinsiala3373cry me a river ivan 😂

    • @billcook7285
      @billcook7285 7 місяців тому +20

      @@edwinsiala3373 😂😂😂 yeah, well, I bet the MFKERS that caught them missiles ain't thinking we delusional. 😂😂🤭

  • @TheExard3k
    @TheExard3k 7 місяців тому +16

    Zeit für deutsche Taurus! Am besten gestern.

  • @northascrowsfly
    @northascrowsfly 7 місяців тому +63

    Phil Gayle is one of my favorite news presenters of all time. It always sounds like a slow read of Lord of the Rings by a fireplace in a stone tower no matter what the topic is. 😁

  • @Lords1997
    @Lords1997 7 місяців тому +46

    Note: these missiles are almost 30yrs old, debris of the missiles show manufacturer dates of 1995,96,97.
    The US would have had to spend money to destroy these missiles. Ukraine is actually saving us money.

    • @PhilipZeplinDK
      @PhilipZeplinDK 7 місяців тому +1

      "debris of the missiles show manufacturer dates of 1995,96,97."
      And exactly what debris are you looking at? Source? Because they just got there, and now you're talking about analysing the debris of them. Which sounds like a load of made up BS.
      Not commenting on anything else, but that sounds wildly made up.

    • @Lords1997
      @Lords1997 7 місяців тому +1

      @@PhilipZeplinDK it’s open sources by partisan residents living in the occupied regions.. The ministry of defense for Ukraine released the images themselves… I don’t know why you commented. You didn’t bring anything useful to the table except doubt. Your probably a propagandist, or an unwitting one at best… Why would I lie about the dates of the missiles? What would that change? You sound like a Putin apologist Ngl….

    • @kiranreilly4916
      @kiranreilly4916 7 місяців тому +1

      @@PhilipZeplinDK These missiles have been in use for days now. DW is just late to the party on this story.

    • @billsigmund8113
      @billsigmund8113 7 місяців тому +2

      I'd like to know where the debris came from since the ATACAM was only built from 2001 to 2004

    • @Lords1997
      @Lords1997 7 місяців тому +4

      @@billsigmund8113 there are literally 5 variants of ATACMS… re-do your research

  • @vergil7185
    @vergil7185 7 місяців тому +58

    Now is time for free Taurus rockets! Please Germany 🇩🇪💪

    • @chrisrobert5252
      @chrisrobert5252 7 місяців тому +1

      For the moment, only the nuclear powers have supplied long-range weapons: the US, UK and France.

    • @lrrrruleroftheplanetomicro6881
      @lrrrruleroftheplanetomicro6881 7 місяців тому +3

      If you're waiting for Prince Valium aka Slowlaf Scholz to make up his mind, I've got bad news for you.

    • @Highskill3r
      @Highskill3r 7 місяців тому

      u got "free" right cuz others and me have to pay for it.. or will u pay for it with ur pocket money?

    • @evilfingers4302
      @evilfingers4302 7 місяців тому

      No need for the Taurus or even the Storm Shadow/Scalp Cruise Missiles, since the ATACMS can be launched anywhere along the Frontline at any given time.

  • @phpn99
    @phpn99 7 місяців тому +110

    "Americans will always do the right thing, only after they have tried everything else" - Winston Churchill

    • @tayler2396
      @tayler2396 7 місяців тому +17

      That's rich, isn't it, coming from Churchill.

    • @michaelhotaling1931
      @michaelhotaling1931 7 місяців тому +3

      @@tayler2396 No less true because it came from Churchill.

    • @larrymunn5279
      @larrymunn5279 7 місяців тому +4

      That is a little rich coming from Churchill I guess but it does ring kind of true lol. Takes one to know one I guess. Dude was probably just mad it took Pear Harbor for them to get involved and many US citizens today are very willing to repeat that.

    • @dnp1814
      @dnp1814 7 місяців тому

      They destroyed Ukraine to test new technology weapons,,, 🤷🤦

    • @Anvilman
      @Anvilman 7 місяців тому +23

      @@dnp1814 Nobody forced Russia to invade Ukraine and commit all those war crimes. And they can leave whenever they want.

  • @pjotrboboy900
    @pjotrboboy900 7 місяців тому +30

    Finally added capability to UAF!
    This is good news. Not for everybody though

  • @HuskyOwner-bl1jf
    @HuskyOwner-bl1jf 7 місяців тому +17

    I hate to say this, but DW is two days late in reporting this

  • @andreataylor7135
    @andreataylor7135 7 місяців тому +7

    Scholz had used the fact that the US had not provided ATACMS as the reason he would not allow German Cruise missiles to be sent to Ukraine, does this mean that Scholz will maybr reconsider his previous refusal to send those cruise missiles now, I hope so.

    • @myshepspud1
      @myshepspud1 7 місяців тому

      Wait another year. Beside, Germany is safe.

    • @stanislavcocek2711
      @stanislavcocek2711 7 місяців тому

      Germany in particular, which caused two world wars, should be at peace. So that the Russians do not reconsider their attitudes towards Germany. But if your hobby is war, then maybe you will see the one where you will also see mushroom clouds. And it will probably be the last thing you look at.🤣

  • @Rascallucci
    @Rascallucci 7 місяців тому +84

    Yessssss!!! Finally!!! Slava Ukraini!!!

    • @anarabbasov8634
      @anarabbasov8634 7 місяців тому +8

      Javelin, Patriot, Abrams, Leopard....

    • @bigspidey
      @bigspidey 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@@anarabbasov8634still counting

    • @anarabbasov8634
      @anarabbasov8634 7 місяців тому +6

      @@bigspidey still uttering "finally"...

    • @havanasyndrome3024
      @havanasyndrome3024 7 місяців тому +2

      😂😂😂. You 🤡🤡🤡 are funny.. Is thisca gamechanger again? 😂😂😂

    • @Anvilman
      @Anvilman 7 місяців тому +2

      @@havanasyndrome3024 Considering how poorly Russia is faring, the game has clearly changed.

  • @tfhmobil
    @tfhmobil 7 місяців тому +3

    ATACM can destroy supply routes. That’s the strength.

  • @severinsilmedin2588
    @severinsilmedin2588 7 місяців тому +189

    If putin call it mistake, then it is the best thing to do. Slava Ukraini!

    • @drmwpn
      @drmwpn 7 місяців тому +11

      He'd definitely know, he's basically the patron saint of unforced errors at this point.

    • @Jakedelus
      @Jakedelus 7 місяців тому +15

      when you know that putin is lying=his mouth is open. every time.

    • @crymeaariver
      @crymeaariver 7 місяців тому +7

      ​@@Jakedelusgame changer # 420 Banderetas! 😂

    • @Thomas-jq1qz
      @Thomas-jq1qz 7 місяців тому

      @@crymeaariver Russia is beating US badly,,, US is winning by marketing their weapons which doesn't stop mighty Russia

    • @Jakedelus
      @Jakedelus 7 місяців тому +7

      @@crymeaariver you are correct, russia has many "game changers" none has seen yet 😬 only human waves one after another.

  • @WhosAfraidofErikNordingII
    @WhosAfraidofErikNordingII 7 місяців тому +11

    It's so nice to see Maidan, Khreschatyk Street and Globus Mall in the background. I miss lovely Kyiv so much!

  • @andyo8141
    @andyo8141 7 місяців тому +4

    Where are the Taurus? Stop being late to the party.

  • @myshepspud1
    @myshepspud1 7 місяців тому

    Even I don't know if it's said yet but it seems we've only seen the 150km version so far.

  • @BlackWater_49
    @BlackWater_49 7 місяців тому +21

    4:27 I'm sorry but that's false.
    Yes, the ATACMS are ballistic missiles but that doesn't make them harder to intercept because
    A: they fly quite high up so can be easily picked up by radar and
    B: they come back down in a parabola trajectory which is predictable and thus they can be intercepted.
    Cruise missiles like the Strom Shadow however stay close to the ground (~50m) and are thus often hidden from radar behind mountains etc. so are quite hard to spot.

    • @antimatters6283
      @antimatters6283 7 місяців тому

      You say; "can be easily picked up by radar .. [trajectory ] is predictable and thus they can be intercepted." And yet, that didn't happen. None were detected or shot down, and it isn't like Russia was not looking for attacks. Other news reports say that ATACMs can also go in zigzag, unpredictable paths. I don't find it credible Russia can shoot down ATACMs, because they haven't, any more than they've shot down HIMARs.

    • @u3962521
      @u3962521 7 місяців тому +8

      Not true sir. Suggest you watch a few videos on atacms. Their trajectory is not predictable. They are manuverable and random. They are flying at mach 3. They repeatedly change direction in flight as required

    • @BlackWater_49
      @BlackWater_49 7 місяців тому

      @@u3962521 Then they aren't ballistic.
      Also at Mach 3 they can't be as maneuverable as Storm Shadow since the law of conservation of momentum means that too tight a turn would break it apart...

    • @LeviBulger
      @LeviBulger 7 місяців тому +4

      False. Maybe research ATACMS before talking out your ace

    • @BlackWater_49
      @BlackWater_49 7 місяців тому +2

      @@LeviBulger Mate, it's physics. Conservation of momentum to be exact.
      You cannot turn as quickly at Mach 3 than you could below March 1 without some serious structural reinforcement because otherwise your missile will literally break itself apart...

  • @michaelmoran2022
    @michaelmoran2022 7 місяців тому +15

    Anounced today that North Korea sending Arms to putin,so we in west can give Ukraine what we want👍👍🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦

    • @m.g.debruin8294
      @m.g.debruin8294 7 місяців тому +2

      Russia get rusty 40 years old Arms from North Korea

  • @angeloangeloqquiambao406
    @angeloangeloqquiambao406 7 місяців тому +12

    Wow full support from PHilippines. Thank you so much US continue to protect Ukraine and Israel.

    • @hkkh164
      @hkkh164 7 місяців тому +2

      Hhhhhhj

  • @izamalcadosa2951
    @izamalcadosa2951 7 місяців тому +1

    Greetings from Los Angeles, California, USA, My German Friends and DW News!!

  • @ebbeb9827
    @ebbeb9827 7 місяців тому +2

    send more!

  • @hablah5015
    @hablah5015 7 місяців тому +25

    Pray and support 🇺🇦 from 🇵🇭

  • @NC.237
    @NC.237 7 місяців тому +28

    God bless America 🇺🇸 yes 👏

  • @rudiruttger
    @rudiruttger 7 місяців тому +22

    I hope for greater success as the situation in Ukraine normalizes, and the reality of their sovereignty is respected by default.

  • @btsgalaxy5832
    @btsgalaxy5832 3 дні тому

    Korea's Chunmoo is better. The cost of Chunmoo is 1/4 of the ATACMS and has almost twice the explosive power built in. The best thing is it can be delivered quickly.

  • @PlayJasch
    @PlayJasch 7 місяців тому +3

    Game Changer👀

  • @fjdkfdfjdf33
    @fjdkfdfjdf33 7 місяців тому +4

    Tomahawk next?

  • @petesalwey3801
    @petesalwey3801 7 місяців тому

    Why isn't this on national news

  • @kiranreilly4916
    @kiranreilly4916 7 місяців тому +3

    Always nice to see German news be fashionably late to a topic

  • @JosueMartinez-ww1vj
    @JosueMartinez-ww1vj 7 місяців тому +29

    Defeating putin, Slava Ukraini 🇺🇦

    • @jacksonmiltin4199
      @jacksonmiltin4199 7 місяців тому +2

      @@musthafapm6775 jaaaa that will never happen😂

  • @charliefoster5133
    @charliefoster5133 7 місяців тому

    Some call it the death bringer

  • @aardvarkmindshank
    @aardvarkmindshank 7 місяців тому +3

    Uhm er erh uhm erh.

  • @timetraveler_0
    @timetraveler_0 7 місяців тому +4

    ATACMs were supposed to be something of a sort of game changers from what I remember, now they are just 'an additional'/nice to have option?

    • @Anvilman
      @Anvilman 7 місяців тому +11

      The game has already changed; Ukraine is pushing Russia back and dealing them horrendous casualties.

    • @bigspidey
      @bigspidey 7 місяців тому +3

      ​@@Anvilmanwhat part of the frontline u are currently

    • @Anvilman
      @Anvilman 7 місяців тому +11

      @@bigspidey It's no secret that Russia has been getting slowly pushed back, and taking horrendous casualties just to slow the Ukrainian advance. They just tried to regain the strategic initiative by attacking Avdiivka, and were beaten horribly.

    • @larrymunn5279
      @larrymunn5279 7 місяців тому

      Well Ukraine lacked anything of the sort I guess till france and the uk chipped in their own stuff, like they said in the video. US either doesn't wanna be seen as the escalator or they just don't wanna fall behind other countries in donations I guess.

    • @tdawg5742
      @tdawg5742 7 місяців тому +6

      @@larrymunn5279 This war is in Europe so it's a European problem so the French, Germans, and UK should be footing the bill on this war. The Americans have a bigger problem to deal with and that's the Chinese who are way more of an issue than the Russians should the Chinese decide to do something. I highly doubt the Europeans will help us in the Pacific since the Europeans are dragging their feet and neglecting the war happening in their backyard. Yet, we're half a world away from the war and we've already donated more to Ukraine than all European nations combined.

  • @leaveourstatuesalone.3378
    @leaveourstatuesalone.3378 7 місяців тому

    Kitch bridge has an appointment with a few of these……❤

  • @sleendrvr
    @sleendrvr 7 місяців тому

    That reporters stutter was so bad it was giving me anxiety.

  • @Freestyle420z
    @Freestyle420z 7 місяців тому +5

    Beautiful

  • @ahmedabakar5166
    @ahmedabakar5166 7 місяців тому +26

    ❤🎉 from Sudan Africa with Israel and America 🇺🇲🇸🇩🇮🇱

    • @mebsrea
      @mebsrea 7 місяців тому

      Unfortunately, Israel’s view of territorial expansion and bombing civilian areas has a lot more in common with Putin’s Russia than with Ukraine and the rest of the civilized world.

  • @zoomout7868
    @zoomout7868 7 місяців тому

    yes!

  • @MusicalMemeology
    @MusicalMemeology 7 місяців тому +1

    Germany needs to stop being so risk averse.

  • @dpelpal
    @dpelpal 7 місяців тому +10

    ATACMS is NOT a ballistic missile, it is a maneuvering missile. If he is going to use the terminology, he needs to get it correct.

    • @TrevorSachko
      @TrevorSachko 7 місяців тому +9

      ATACMS is described as a "tactical ballistic missile"...ffs.

    • @MatthijsvanDuin
      @MatthijsvanDuin 7 місяців тому

      Seems more like the army just made up their own term: "This class of weapon is thus widely referred to as a "quasi-ballistic missile", though the US Army has also referred to the ATACMS as a "maneuvering missile""

  • @mohammedalrashed1132
    @mohammedalrashed1132 7 місяців тому +5

    I heard the German 🇩🇪 tanks were game changers. We don't hear of them anymore.

    • @nematube
      @nematube 7 місяців тому

      That ole ironic "oh wasn't that supposed to be the game changing wonder weapon" has always been a strawman false critique by pro-Kremlin stooges and Putin's useful idiots.

    • @esteemedyams
      @esteemedyams 7 місяців тому

      I also heard that Russia could take the entirety of Eastern Europe within a week.
      And I also heard that they could take Kyiv in 2 weeks.
      And that russia has the second strongest army in the world.
      And that they're not going to invade Ukraine.
      And that this isn't a war, it's a "special military operation".
      And that their BMPT "Terminator" was indestructible.
      And that the Moskva was unsinkable.
      And that Europe will freeze and wither without russian gas.
      Funny how we don't hear about these things anymore, eh you twit?

    • @Teknisk
      @Teknisk 7 місяців тому +4

      Because you trolls get new scripts. Soon they will pay you potatoes or vodka to write about fighterjets. 😅

    • @mebsrea
      @mebsrea 7 місяців тому

      They might have been, had they been provided half a year earlier. Instead, they’re a useful addition to Ukrainian forces and have preserved the lives of a number of their crews who would not have survived the destruction of a Soviet-made tank.

  • @seanbrown701
    @seanbrown701 7 місяців тому +2

    Next is the F16 to touch Russian helicopters at a range of 120 km. They sit up high and their radar picks up the tree skimming helicopter. Press the button and kaboom.

  • @LarsDennert
    @LarsDennert 7 місяців тому

    Precision guided munitions decrease the chances of civilian casualties.

  • @thefinal485
    @thefinal485 7 місяців тому +3

    Looks pretty freakin cool but scary

  • @krisfrederick5001
    @krisfrederick5001 7 місяців тому +50

    Ask the Russians what they are capable of. You might not get an answer on the other end. "ATACMS!" The most clever acronym in weaponry history...
    Slava Ukraini 💙💛

    • @WorldCitizen0000
      @WorldCitizen0000 7 місяців тому +8

      Ruzzia answers: My planes and helicopters 😭😭

    • @Thomas-jq1qz
      @Thomas-jq1qz 7 місяців тому +8

      How many times have we heard of game changer weopons offered to Ukraine,, but they get destroyed in a matter of hours by Russians..

    • @petersouthernboy6327
      @petersouthernboy6327 7 місяців тому +2

      Thomas mad cope

    • @jamesferguson2353
      @jamesferguson2353 7 місяців тому +1

      @@Thomas-jq1qz and yet big bad Ruzzia is in a quagmire........SMA lmao

    • @m.g.debruin8294
      @m.g.debruin8294 7 місяців тому +2

      Yes Russia have now only 30 helicopters left. Super Power?@@WorldCitizen0000

  • @DR.ELEKTRIK
    @DR.ELEKTRIK 7 місяців тому

    What agreement?

  • @lawfordisaacs
    @lawfordisaacs 7 місяців тому +8

    Please. Give. Ukraine. And. IiSRAEL. What. They. Need. To. Win.

    • @Meeko2689
      @Meeko2689 7 місяців тому +1

      They need you buddy

  • @nooboard
    @nooboard 7 місяців тому +3

    ATACMS is a short-range system, not long-range. It is ONLY 300 km max range. That's short-range, not long-range. Please get your facts and wording right.

    • @Jakedelus
      @Jakedelus 7 місяців тому +6

      it is Rocket artillery system and on that purpose it is long range system. So check your own facts right.

  • @everypitchcounts4875
    @everypitchcounts4875 7 місяців тому

    ATACMS also goes mach 3

  • @JoseSy01
    @JoseSy01 7 місяців тому

    sounds like a military industrial complex convention here.

  • @JosephPankito-cy1fk
    @JosephPankito-cy1fk 7 місяців тому +12

    Gd news.. Bravo ukraine.

  • @GUMBStv
    @GUMBStv 7 місяців тому +3

    Glory to Ukraine

  • @robertbrooks6167
    @robertbrooks6167 7 місяців тому

    3,700 produced total

  • @hkkh164
    @hkkh164 7 місяців тому

    There is no changes in first line

  • @folgendeinemtraumen995
    @folgendeinemtraumen995 7 місяців тому +6

    ...the logic tells me that Russia not overreacting facing the weaponry in series called "games changer"like this one means the arsenal from Russia is way to far from being running out off...good news for the whole world 😂

    • @Just_another_Euro_dude
      @Just_another_Euro_dude 7 місяців тому +1

      😂 Check the news. Russians already saying : "This was a bad day", after Ukraine erased Berdyansk base with ATACMS together with all the choppers. 😅😂😊😮

    • @esteemedyams
      @esteemedyams 7 місяців тому +1

      2 airfields completely wiped out with 4 rockets in 1 day and old Put-Put staging an emergency "press conference" to tell everybody that everything's okay
      Yeah, it sure seems like the russkies got things under control, you should definitely keep licking their boots

  • @maxotbekessov2225
    @maxotbekessov2225 7 місяців тому +9

    USA HAVE BEEN PROMISED TO UKRAINE GARANTIA TERRITORY INTEGRITY ACCORDIND BUDAPEST MEMORANDUM, SO KEEP THIS PROMISE. GREAT JOB, WELL DONE. GLORIA TO UKRAINE!!!

    • @damarcusowens5511
      @damarcusowens5511 7 місяців тому

      a promise made 30 years ago by people who don’t even work for the government anymore

  • @ddniidn8426
    @ddniidn8426 7 місяців тому

    HIMARS still stand strong and deliver!

  • @guydreamr
    @guydreamr 7 місяців тому +1

    One more thing for Rasputin to worry about. Give 'em hell, Ukraine.

  • @Supernaut2000
    @Supernaut2000 7 місяців тому +5

    These ATACMS may be "old" technology but it performs better than anything Russia has. Let 'er rip!

  • @Scrapper.
    @Scrapper. 7 місяців тому +23

    I read somewhere that at least 13 Russian military helicopters have successfully intercepted and destroyed a barrage of ATACM missiles. Apparently Russian helicopters are so advanced they don't even have to fly to destroy the enemy's missiles. On day 604 of his 10-day special military operation to conquer Ukraine, the great Vladimir is once again victorious.

    • @operator9858
      @operator9858 7 місяців тому +1

      At least russia still has helicoptors left...and didnt have to run to mommy to get their weapons...

    • @larrymunn5279
      @larrymunn5279 7 місяців тому

      Ah, the age old video game strategy of "tanking". Intercepting damage with your face. lol

    • @Anvilman
      @Anvilman 7 місяців тому +8

      @@operator9858 Salty vatnik is salty that Ukraine's allies arn't rolling over for Putin.

    • @trident6547
      @trident6547 7 місяців тому

      @@operator9858 Says the guy whose leader runs to Kim Jong Un of all the world leaders for supplies and support. Let´s hope North Korea send a brigade or two to Ukraine because as soon as they reach Ukrainian territory they will throw down their weapons and all run over to Ukrainian lines and ask for political asylum.

    • @154fleetwood
      @154fleetwood 7 місяців тому +1

      Yeah keep reading it and believing it😂😂😂

  • @tyson7004
    @tyson7004 7 місяців тому +1

    Bit delayed mate. They’ve already been using them for a couple days

  • @medhavimanus
    @medhavimanus 7 місяців тому

    Isn't this anchor the hotel receptionist from Jhon wick?

  • @jeep146
    @jeep146 7 місяців тому +3

    And the rocket's red glare, the bombs bursting in air
    Gave proof through the night that our flag was still there
    O say does that star-spangled banner yet wave
    O'er the land of the free and the home of the brave

  • @markdeckard7651
    @markdeckard7651 7 місяців тому +5

    Putin "ATACMS another mistake by the US". Yes, now let's quietly and mistakenly give Ukraine back their nukes. Loving these Freedom mistakes.

    • @Anvilman
      @Anvilman 7 місяців тому

      Nukes are only useful as a deterrent, so that would be a bad idea at this point.

    • @jeremygibbs7342
      @jeremygibbs7342 7 місяців тому +2

      Not the nukes, but lets give them the actual number of tanks and fighter jets to win this war.

    • @operator9858
      @operator9858 7 місяців тому

      Sry kids, fantasy time is over. They werent their nukes in the first place, they never had the launch codes and russians garrisoned the missiles themselves.
      And what impact are you really expecting with the atacms? You really think they are going to turn the tide? Not much left otherwise if it wont and they didnt make that many of them to start...

    • @Anvilman
      @Anvilman 7 місяців тому

      @@operator9858 Desperate vatnik is desperate. Meanwhile, Russian soldiers continue to lose and get humiliated.

    • @4layers404
      @4layers404 7 місяців тому +2

      Definitely no to nukes

  • @jonny5714
    @jonny5714 7 місяців тому +1

    Why can't the attack their own bridge?

  • @Wayouts123
    @Wayouts123 7 місяців тому

    And these are older versions

  • @matiasd.c9949
    @matiasd.c9949 7 місяців тому +21

    I have to admit Russia is getting their butt kicked by a country half its size Russian army is not as mighty as we thought is not even competent all america has to do is provide weapons and instruct ukraine how to defeat Russian army..

    • @boink800
      @boink800 7 місяців тому +9

      It was all smoke and mirrors coming out of Russia. Nobody could have imagined the massive scale of incompetence.

    • @Anthony-jo7up
      @Anthony-jo7up 7 місяців тому +10

      Half its size? Russia is 150x the size of Ukraine. And still losing everything, as you said. The only historical comparison could be the early USA resisting the British Empire. Ukraine is genuinely accomplishing something inspiring and special.

    • @matiasd.c9949
      @matiasd.c9949 7 місяців тому +3

      @@Anthony-jo7up ..Yes but base on population Russia is 2x the size of Ukraine but still amazing how america can defeat the incompetent and over hyped russian army by just providing weapons and instructing Ukraine how to do it

    • @Anthony-jo7up
      @Anthony-jo7up 7 місяців тому +10

      @matiasd.c9949 Yep, Ukraine is about 1/3 the population of Russia, with an economy 1/20 its size. The fact it has managed to not only hold, but inflict disproportionate damage is crazy. And the US weapons sent are 30-50 years old. It's absolutely wild how overpowered the US is in warfare, that its tools from the previous century are unmatchable. Also its a crazy geostrategic win for the US to destroy the massive Soviet arsenal with minimal expenditure and without firing a single shot itself.

    • @delos2279
      @delos2279 7 місяців тому +2

      Right except not half its size, Russia is literally 28 times larger in landmass and almost 3 times the population.

  • @lucaluca8377
    @lucaluca8377 7 місяців тому +6

    🇺🇸💪🇺🇦🇺🇸🇺🇦

  • @Cryosxify
    @Cryosxify 7 місяців тому +1

    give em tomahawk + typhon and jassm

  • @cosmincalin1469
    @cosmincalin1469 7 місяців тому +1

    Russia should use s300 to intercept them now behind 100 kilometres of the front linne

  • @dirtyharry6297
    @dirtyharry6297 7 місяців тому +11

    🇺🇦❤🇺🇸

  • @kanyon_ni_mang_simeon
    @kanyon_ni_mang_simeon 7 місяців тому +8

    If the US gave this long time ago Ukraine could've regain most of its territories back by now, the delay was uneccessary !

    • @kennethforsythe8182
      @kennethforsythe8182 7 місяців тому

      The ATACMS is no different than the Iskander, which Ukraine has. So your statement is quite invalid.

    • @wolfgangselle3272
      @wolfgangselle3272 7 місяців тому +1

      @@kennethforsythe8182maybe on the spec sheet … 😂 we all can see what the Russian weapons have for a value and how strong they are in real life. And it’s shows ( at least with there conventional weapons ) they are only on paper strong!

    • @Eugenetra7
      @Eugenetra7 7 місяців тому +1

      @@kennethforsythe8182 Iskander is a russian missile, we never had them. And we had 5 major storage facilities destroyed before 2022. Almost nothing left.

  • @stevec9669
    @stevec9669 7 місяців тому

    What's wrong with attacking the Crimea Bridge?

  • @epicfish5893
    @epicfish5893 7 місяців тому

    Where are Taurus?

  • @Rottweilerdsq
    @Rottweilerdsq 7 місяців тому +7

    Slava Ukraine 🪖🔱

  • @discoverydroid2134
    @discoverydroid2134 7 місяців тому +22

    Be grateful to the US...but first, give much thanks to great Britain 🇬🇧 and France 🇫🇷 for forcing the hands of the US by leading the way with storm shadow and scalp eg..they are the true saviors here 🎉

    • @jansix4287
      @jansix4287 7 місяців тому +1

      LOL. Yeah, forcing other countries’ hands supposedly was also the best about those 14 Challengers. 🤭

    • @chrisrobert5252
      @chrisrobert5252 7 місяців тому +3

      infantile comment aimed at dividing Ukraine's supporters... Krembot?

    • @goutvols103
      @goutvols103 7 місяців тому +1

      If Trump was president, Trump would have given Ukraine all requested F-16s and A-10s by now. Biden is a weak link.

    • @delos2279
      @delos2279 7 місяців тому +1

      NL and DK F-16s coming up next!

    • @Anvilman
      @Anvilman 7 місяців тому

      @@goutvols103 I'm assuming that was sarcasm. Unfortunately, Poe's law is in full effect here.

  • @1pasupaty
    @1pasupaty 7 місяців тому

    These might deter Russian forces to some extent.

  • @grahamelliott9506
    @grahamelliott9506 7 місяців тому

    and the europeans called the GMLRS system 'long range'
    this is our 'long range' tactical missile... we consider GMLRS to be up to medium range

  • @shannonbertram5513
    @shannonbertram5513 7 місяців тому +1

    The first 7 they fired 5 got shot
    Without air defence calibration

  • @wtl912
    @wtl912 7 місяців тому +3

    Stop Putin.
    Stay strong Ukraine 🙏💛💙

  • @khusirana7465
    @khusirana7465 7 місяців тому +5

    God bless Ukraine 🇺🇦 🇺🇦🇺🇦❤️❤️❤️🙏🙏🙏

  • @brunol-p_g8800
    @brunol-p_g8800 7 місяців тому +1

    Dumb bombs equipped with a propulsion system, not missiles.

  • @circamagoo
    @circamagoo 7 місяців тому

    ATTACKUMS? what a name

  • @SkepticalChris
    @SkepticalChris 7 місяців тому +3

    You can almost hear Putin peeing his pants!

  • @daviddunning8357
    @daviddunning8357 7 місяців тому +4

    At what point does Russia punish the US for their missiles hitting Russian targets.

    • @Anvilman
      @Anvilman 7 місяців тому +1

      How do expect them to do that exactly? A direct conflict would either result in Russia getting steamrolled in conventional warfare, or both sides getting destroyed via nuclear exchange. Not even Putin is dumb enough to want that.

    • @delos2279
      @delos2279 7 місяців тому +2

      At what point does the US punish Russa for almost every country it fought using Russian weapons, tanks and aircraft? And before that Soviets. I guess never.

    • @gfys756
      @gfys756 7 місяців тому +2

      ​@@delos2279And why was America fighting those wars thousands of miles away, in the first place? 🤔

    • @Vikingpoints
      @Vikingpoints 7 місяців тому

      They can’t do anything to the US. If the US ever truly got involved it would be a slaughter. Russia can’t even handle old tech in Ukraine. Imagine if they had to fight against a navy and a real Air Force. 2 months and there wouldn’t be a single Russian left in Ukraine. Period

    • @daviddunning8357
      @daviddunning8357 7 місяців тому

      @@delos2279 major powers usually supply their out dated inventory to have an excuse to spend more. I’m just thinking escalation can’t be far off.

  • @kenroyneptume5051
    @kenroyneptume5051 7 місяців тому

    "Well done "

  • @antonysimpson5304
    @antonysimpson5304 7 місяців тому

    This sounds a bit like - the last hope.

  • @ontargetagain7113
    @ontargetagain7113 7 місяців тому +6

    God Bless Ukraine, Israel & America. Shalom

  • @truthbud
    @truthbud 7 місяців тому +13

    The overwhelming amоunt of approving and cheering соmments by ordinary Russians in response to videos about the atrocities committed against civilians and prisoners of war in Ukraine were equally as shocking to Ukrainians as the war itself.
    We somehow became accustomed to the war, but the realization of who we have been living alongside all this time without even knowing it is still horrifying.
    Those barbaric creatures referred to themselves as our brоthеrly people.
    Negotiating with Russia is lіkе negotiating with ЕbоІа vіrus. Leaving Russia undefeated is like undertreating a deadly infection. It will only come back stronger. That's why any peace agreement lacking a clear victory for Ukraine is nothing but a temporary сеаsеfire.

    • @2010hyundaielantra
      @2010hyundaielantra 7 місяців тому +2

      you have to be a bot i've heard that multiple times.

    • @jeremygibbs7342
      @jeremygibbs7342 7 місяців тому +5

      If they are a bot. They are a bot for good

    • @2010hyundaielantra
      @2010hyundaielantra 7 місяців тому

      @@jeremygibbs7342 yeah, but this is dehumanization. they are comparing Russians to something with negative connotation. also, peace talks will work, and we just haven't tried them because "Negotiating with Russia is lіkе negotiating with ЕbоІа vіrus. Leaving Russia undefeated is like undertreating a deadly infection. It will only come back stronger. That's why any peace agreement lacking a clear victory for Ukraine is nothing but a temporary сеаsеfire." because these bots want to exterminate and genocide Russians. of course, they could also be a st Petersburg factory troll trying to discredit Ukraine.

  • @redmustangredmustang
    @redmustangredmustang 7 місяців тому +1

    There were some missiles that were going far back as 1996. All this does is wipe out old inventory and giving Ukraine our old missiles and weapons rather than spending money decommissioning them takes time, they can be used against the Russians.

    • @SunSeeker-yv7tu
      @SunSeeker-yv7tu 7 місяців тому +1

      😂 as an asian i just awed..
      I have no idea when we could be able to produce such things.
      And then u here just give it free in order to decommissioning it. Felt like, I born up in wrong country😅

  • @everypitchcounts4875
    @everypitchcounts4875 7 місяців тому

    Now what excuse is Germany going to use for not sending the Taurus missiles. Germany said it would send Taurus if US sent ATACMS. Your move Germany.

  • @steffanmlgaard
    @steffanmlgaard 7 місяців тому +7

    The only thing Rusia can do is sabotage pipelines😆

  • @AlternativeBrew
    @AlternativeBrew 7 місяців тому +5

    Another wonder weapon, where are the Modern main battle tanks, what difference did they make to the failed counter offensive. It was the rage and now a new toy is introduced to avert attention is the failed Summer, Spring counter offensive.

    • @hape3862
      @hape3862 7 місяців тому

      Russia is begging North Korea for munitions, losing hundreds of men and dozens of military equipment every day, its helicopters and fighter jets are being destroyed on the ground (Russian ground, mind you!), and its ships and even submarines are being destroyed in Russian dry docks, not to mention its generals are dying like flies - so who is failing here?

    • @mfundomkhonta7500
      @mfundomkhonta7500 7 місяців тому

      Ask Russia hw many Russians are dead bcz of this weopons ,u will the get yo answers

    • @jonpetter8921
      @jonpetter8921 7 місяців тому +10

      Wasn t this the 3 days special operation :D ? before fleeing Kiev, Kherson and Kharkiv :D

    • @sebastiaanl9876
      @sebastiaanl9876 7 місяців тому +7

      Failed mission of Russia almost 2 years later still nothing

    • @Jakedelus
      @Jakedelus 7 місяців тому +7

      you tell me where is armata tank? oh now i remember. it stalled on parade and cant move. legend says it is still there :D with atacms this is just beginning lot more to come and kremlin bot can watch

  • @putinhuylo5404
    @putinhuylo5404 7 місяців тому +1

    DW, stop twisting the facts and make it look like Ukraine has received from the West "wunderwaffe". ATACMS (for Ukraine) are even not of mid, but the short-range missiles (100 miles).

  • @stanislavcocek2711
    @stanislavcocek2711 7 місяців тому +1

    First it was short-range missiles, now long-range missiles. And when will American short-range nuclear weapons arrive in Ukraine? America increases supplies of more powerful weapons. But Russia will do the same. But the war is on Ukrainian and Russian territory, so the US is satisfied. The main thing will be that it doesn't turn over and it doesn't get to the point where rockets start hitting the US as well.

  • @thomasgeorgecastleberry6918
    @thomasgeorgecastleberry6918 7 місяців тому +5

    Worried about escalation? Russia currently is getting weaker & weaker pretty soon they won't be able to retaliate except with there nuclear bombs, the only card they have left.

    • @Pram4
      @Pram4 7 місяців тому

      Asia and Africa will join to destroy usa

    • @tommygun5038
      @tommygun5038 7 місяців тому +2

      Retaliate for what? Losing on another countries soil?

    • @ricardosmythe2548
      @ricardosmythe2548 7 місяців тому

      Russia won't use nukes unless its to defend its own territory. Using them against Ukraine would bring an immidiate and devastating volley of conventional strikes against Russias forces from Nato members.

  • @bff1586
    @bff1586 7 місяців тому +3

    DW-WORLD the Russian country has S450, S500 and possibly S550 intercept missiles.

    • @boink800
      @boink800 7 місяців тому +11

      And none of them work against 30-year old ATACM's. Ha, ha, ha, ha, ha

    • @hape3862
      @hape3862 7 місяців тому +3

      Are these the ones that protected the navy headquarters in Sevastopol?

    • @Vikingpoints
      @Vikingpoints 7 місяців тому

      Lol all of Russia invincible weapons are shown to be jokes to the world. Patriot in Kiev has 100% success rate. Russias weapons are exceedingly weak.

    • @gfys756
      @gfys756 7 місяців тому +1

      ​@@Vikingpoints"100% success rate", yet couldn't even defeat Houthi rockets in Yemen 😂🇵🇸

    • @DOHCCordia
      @DOHCCordia 7 місяців тому

      Must be the ones that stopped the drones in moscow. lol