How Missile System Works | ATACMS MLRS
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 гру 2023
- This is ATACMS missile and is basically a Solid Fuel rocket propulsion system.
The Missiles ascend post-launch using GPS for course adjustment; their fins move per visuals, directed by inertial navigation or military-grade GPS to hit designated targets; upon impact, the sensor triggers a 500-pound TNT blast, capable of bunker destruction.
Interestingly they can be operated from both platforms the HIMARS or the track version MLRS.
This requires a platform to transport with this Galaxy C-5 aircraft.
We will also look at the step-by-step process of how this works
#missile #ukraine #israel
Instagram
/ aitelly3d
Twitter
/ aitelly3d
We make it on Blender
Download it is free and Safe
www.blender.org/download/
Peace Out
As a Small Channel We encourage you sharing our Videos ,
But Kindly be advised that any unofficial translations or editing of our work in any medium will be considered a breach of our intellectual property rights.
Apologies for the Legal Language, This happens because we had faced a lot of Duplicates Contents through Experiences ;)
This has been a result of Big Channels Duplicating our Contents Ripping our original hard work which we have created from Scratch from Modeling to Rigging to Animation to Rendering.So we had to involved Lawyers. - Наука та технологія
Please Subscribe for more Videos!
Please, Leclerc MBT your videos are really nice!
Why can't you just use metric measures bruh????
There is a big mistake in this video. You compared a supersonic ballistic missile ATACMS to a subsonic cruise missile Kh-101. The russian equivalent of ATACMS is Iskander or Kinjal not Kh-101. That's a big mistake. The US equivalent of Kh-101 or Stormshadow are others cruise missile like Tomahawk, all are subsonic.
Please use MKSA units for next videos. Only USA uses feet or inches.
Make a video on Pinaka MLRS 🙏
now thats some amazing animation and explanations. THX so much for the video, youre the best
Perfect job 🤩
Great vid - thx!
Good stuff, thank you.
" how fins work " keep up the good work !
Great job!
Thanks for great video
Thank You
great work!
great video. thnk you...
Excellent info bite 👍
The missile knows where it is at all times. It knows this because it knows where it isn't. By subtracting where it is from where it isn't, or where it isn't from where it is (whichever is greater), it obtains a difference, or deviation. The guidance subsystem uses deviations to generate corrective commands to drive the missile from a position where it is to a position where it isn't, and arriving at a position where it wasn't, it now is. Consequently, the position where it is, is now the position that it wasn't, and it follows that the position that it was, is now the position that it isn't.
In the event that the position that it is in is not the position that it wasn't, the system has acquired a variation, the variation being the difference between where the missile is, and where it wasn't. If variation is considered to be a significant factor, it too may be corrected by the GEA. However, the missile must also know where it was.
The missile guidance computer scenario works as follows. Because a variation has modified some of the information the missile has obtained, it is not sure just where it is. However, it is sure where it isn't, within reason, and it knows where it was. It now subtracts where it should be from where it wasn't, or vice-versa, and by differentiating this from the algebraic sum of where it shouldn't be, and where it was, it is able to obtain the deviation and its variation, which is called error.
It's unbelievable to me that people like you exist, to still be copy/pasting this garbage....
Take your flowers 😁😁😁
You engineer folks are so clever.
.
And then it turns into a flower pot.
Nice ❤ thanks
Thanks
Very informative speech enjoy it thank you .Geo prespective
I am from India and like your video each time 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
3:30 can you really compare the ATACMS which is essentially a short range ballistic missile to cruise missiles?
No, you can't.
I Agee you cant compare but was just curious how fast they are
@@Aitelly fair enough
@@Aitelly
Why not compare US weapons to its equivalents in other countries ?
you make it seems like the US has an obvious advantage in every technology and no one else can match US tech ... you loose credability since the people who now the tech in this field begin questioning your motives and video looks more like propaganda than actual explanation. dont fall victim to this way of thinking ! so far you ware douing fine.
@@Aitelly just a tip, most people watching these kinds of videos are very into details so even if you wanted to just compare them out of curiosity, mention that in the video.
cheers, love the content.
Hi, your video uploaded is remarkable, kindly name or list of softwares used in 3D animation, i m interested in animation specifically 3D animation
Nice video and nice channel.
How the control fins are moving, there should be a servo or motor to move them . as well as a source of energy (Battery) to drive those motors.
Is any of that significant for this purpose?
What do you want them to do, indicate every screw in the thing? For what?
great
Decent video. Some inaccuracies, but overall pretty solid.
give them more and you will get more good video from the battle field?
Decent comment. Prettey useless though but great.
The ATACMS uses laser based inertial guide systems (not the old mechanical gyroscope type). They are much more advanced and accurate.
metric system , metric system ,metric system is that so hard !!
What's that?
It's the measuring system the US military uses.
Metric for smart people, not for stupid
That's for peasants
Jeezz....you need a drink
GOOD ANIMATION
Can someone give more details about the rocket engine(motor)???
First up, love it. Keep up the good work.
But....
It is misleading to compare the speed of a rocket motor to the air breathing cruise missiles that you used as an example.
That's all.
Other anti aa is high value or not?
Will there be videos about self propelled artillery?))
Question?
Regarding the Impact sensor at the beginning, is it possible that bad weather could interfere with its projected path or destination?
-Say Rain, Snow, Hail Fog, High Winds?
It’s not really an issue. Prior to firing, meteorological data is taken into account and is processed by the weapon. Unless you’re firing it into a literal tornado it won’t affect anything in terms of accuracy.
it's about how gps signal are recieved during it's flight.
Are you comparing cruise missile to a ballistic one??
Wow
Is it a ballistic or cruiser missile?
Can you please make video about Maheshwarastra missile
Hey ai telly I am back again 👋👋
Can you make a video about typhon missile system?
Can you talk about Sweden tanks, Strv-122s, and EVO
Great video - as usual. But why the inconsistency with imperial Vs metric? Please do both or just metric.
What the hell is a kilometer?
Simplicity@@rowingman2407
wow
Pls put a video on us ticonderoga class cruiser and its weapons like mk32 torpedo and all .🎉
Oil tanker, carrier,LPD, space x reusable rocket kindly make video
You got the animation wrong. ATACMS is a tactical ballistic missile. It does not swerve and adjust like cruise missiles
It will now
@@familypowergroup how?
@@TrusePkay that’s G15 classified information
@@familypowergroup So ATACMs now fly like cruise missiles or what
@@TrusePkay that’s for me to know and for you to find out
Focusing on the velocity of atacms vs storm shadow implies one is better than the other just because of speed. Ther speed of storm shadow isn't lower because it's worse, that speed was a deliberate decision to maximize range and ability to avoid anti air defenses.
Please specify speed in KM/h too like you did in other videos
How do you aim it if all satellites suddenly lose communications simultaneously?
👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻👍🏻
The ruzzians have already appreciated the ATACMS MLRS quality, after arrival everyone is happy, there were no complaints.
Поэтому потери украинских свиней уже более 500k?😂😂😂😂😂
Lol
РЭБ глушит сигнал GPS и ракета становится бесполезной.
Russians are happy for all Nazi weapons that they can jam. 😂
@@F_JoeBiden-tu6cl На любую хитровыебанную гайку найдется свой болт.
Waiting for Rafale and SU 30 MKI videos. 🥲😪
do Zircon hypersonic
4:34 “MLRS” is the type of vehicle, this one is called M270
Range?
make a video with SpaceX starship
@ 3:51, it is not appropriate at all to compare ballistic to cruise missiles in terms of speed.
❤
Great video. I wonder if Japan will get these soon.
Your master don't give it yet? Japan beloved wife, strange
@@sergiovictor7581 Russian bot, don't cry, cope.
@@JigilJigil us slave))
😂😂😂😂один раз вам дали 2 штуки и то не донесли😂😂😂😂они могут повторит если плохо себя вести
mach 3 is approximately 3300 mph not 2300 mph as you show in your video.
Next is Namer apc please
Is it still considered triangulation if more than 3 satalites are angulating?
Quadagulation? Pentangulation?
SEXangulation.
Haha GPS actually uses trilateration, not triangulation. Although sexangulation sounds intriguing lol
If more than four satellites are available you use a least squared error solution using all of them. This improves accuracy so is well worth the effort.
I guess if This guy can give an explanation, true or false, then our adversaries also know how it works.
Make a video for India's BrahMos missile.
I would think this type of information would be secure.
Comparing the British & Russian cruise missile varriants to the ATACMS is comparing apples to oranges my man.
I know 😌
@@Aitelly yet you still did it. You bold sum bitch. I like it!
It has an interesting noise, when it disappears. No movies were ever made about it. When a disappearing missile explodes, it sounds as a space explosion, some missiles were tested in space, how they explode. Disappearing missiles sound, as if you hit a container with a heavy concrete block. Men slam the door in during a disappearance of a missile, it causes such an anger.
Amazing weapons...but they target children and innocent people
❤❤❤ love 😘😘😘
Afther watching the missile I notice the form of the body is pretty much like a artillery shell but with guides system and a motor and also some wings..
hmmmm
Artillery shell under steroids
AERODYNAMX 😮 bullet simple
PLEASE. USE INTERNACIONAL METRIC UNITS, ONLY. IT IS A MES OF IMPERIAL UNITS AND METRIC
I thought this was a long range missile, 40 miles LOL!
4:04 whhhhat you cant compare it with iskander and kinzal thay has 500to 2000km rang and haypersonicspeed....actually no westren missile can even be close to them
Ok , I'll give you my invention way , my flash driving invention running in light speed way can power that perpetual power. No batteries just running and flying.
My invention is perpetual motion power so the missile can go up and can Returns if not used . It has no weight and floating in the air , and can wait .
Before blasting. The missile can be control by the base . Can be a guide to approching aircraft to destroy or not .
Aitelly
Please tell your animators to animate a soft drink machine shooting grenades
Paveeeeeeez
add metric system.
At Nun like A EXO rocket ♥️💪🏾 created 80’s
It is a system and functionally equivalent to the Egyptian Raad 200 MLRS which is a guided rocket launcher.
Эффект радвет - обьемный взрыв - хоть дошли
The monoblock warhead of the ATACMS MLRS missile cannot contain 500 pounds of explosives because 50-70% of the weight is the metal shell.
6:46 "Blast equivalent to 500 pounds of TNT".
@@HalfBreedMix For the idiots, I repeat again - the ATACMS MLRS monobloc warhead cannot contain 500 pounds of explosives. It weighs 500 pounds by itself - explosives plus shell. And some short-sighted UA-cam bloggers believe that if the warhead weighs 500 pounds or has some other weight, then this means that the explosive itself weighs that much, but this is not so.
@@user-tn1rc5rq4vwell, explosives can have more efficient than tnt equivalent filler
So even if it is only 250lb warhead, it can have a filler that is 2 times more efficient
Name an explosive that is twice as effective as TNT (trinitrotoluene).
By the way, the description does not say that the warhead carries explosives equivalent to 500 pounds of TNT.
Can someone explain why the Russians can’t just shoot it down tho? What makes himars and mlrs missles special? I was hoping this video would go into that
Air breathing targets (MIG29, etc.) have lots of surface area and many things that dislike having holes (even small ones) punched in them. So a SAM that gets close and detonates a fragmentation warhead works well.
A missile has fewer sensitive areas so is much harder to destroy. Punch a hole in the empty motor case and who cares?
PAC3 and THAAD use hit to kill for this reason. Trickier to pull off but very effective.
On ne compare pas un missile à trajectoire balistique avec des missiles de croisière !
4:07 3d Error
Now at least please make a video of how the p700 granit missile works. Please 🙏 It is also used in the ongoing Russia Ukrainian war.
П700 не используеца , был выведен с експлуатацыии с обох сторон , так как ракета не удобная , малава радиуса действия и дорога в обслужывании . Но ето в дальоких 60-х было хорошым оружыем .
Well! With all the stated features of the ATCAMs, I strongly doubt that it can hit an S 400 without bieng noticed and tracked at a long range.
All us stupid rockets easy target for s400
It did actually, and multiple times, Russia lost many s400s batteries in Ukraine, a dozen of them to ATCAMs, Russia military tech is old unreliable junk.
@@JigilJigil this old junk fuck up all us and their slaves
Let's remind that the C-5 Galaxy heavy military transport aircraft has an adjustable landing gear suspension, allowing it to get closer to the ground (usually the airbase tarmac) to deploy the fore and aft cargo ramps more efficiently.
It makes no sense to compare the speed of a ballistic missile to a cruise missile like storm shadow.
now we're using cluster eh?
Have been for some time Russia has been the whole time
من که دست بردم به گنج حسن بی پایان دوست، صد گدای همچو خود را بعد از این قارون کنم
8:20 min video was about that how Humanity can be killed...
Add a camera and steer it yourself
Atacms are so ineffective that even helicopters on the ground can intercept them
Why aren’t Russia intercepting them? Out of helicopters?
Im still shocked we dont have any stealth missile. I bet we do and they are TOP SECRET. Another thing id love to see as a commander is a two stage bunker buster upon 500 feet from target the second stage would launch accelerating a pre detonation warhead prior to the main warheads impact for a delayed one two punch on a singular impact point. That would be devastating and effective.
I'm pretty sure the AGM-158C LRASM is a stealth missile used by the Navy and Air force against ships, Lockheed is trying to explore integrating it with the Himars for the Army but the Army is mainly focusing on the PrSM. Maybe in the future, we might see a sub type of it that can fit the Himars and its bigger brother, M270.
👍😎🍺🍩🚀🚀
+
Make mig 29
WHOLE COUNTRY SHOULD STOP MAKING VERY DANGEROUS WAR FARE DEADLY DESTRYING WEAPONS????????
Thank you so much for this awesome job and accuracy in briefing but with all my respect to you you just confirm to me that this missiles and missile system is just piece of junk and totally waste of time money and worthless even more this missiles are just propaganda nothing more Russia 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺 winning the war
Let us be realistic let us made a little Comparison between the Turkish cruise missiles som and those missiles we will found that the Turkish cruise missiles are 1000.000 % advanced and more accurate and reliable and much better than those American missiles Turkish missiles operate via the map coordinate system, meaning information of the targetand coordinates are entered at Air base before launching the attack and Strike The Turkish missiles do not need any external operator or assistant, such as satellites, to locate and hit the target, unlike American missiles
2.These missiles and their presence in the Ukrainian-Russian war expose American national security to a grave danger if Russia feels that the United States of America is using its satellites Against it. Russia has the right to defend itself against these satellites. Russia has the full ability to launch another star war, worse than the star wars that took place during the Reagan era, and here Russia can destroy and strike every American satellite or European Russia was also harmed by a military branch of the Red Army specializing in space
Not accurate for precision targeting ...
AAA
The russians are not stupid enough to bring an expensive system like S400 so close to the battlefield. In addition, the S400 can shoot aerial targets from 200 to almost 350 Kms away. There is no need to bring them so close
Russia lost so many S400s in Ukraine, most of the future buyers of the system actually canceled their orders after they saw how uselss it was in Ukraine.
@@JigilJigil Russia has never lost S400, but did destroy patriots.
@@fazelfayazi6985no they didnt
@@fazelfayazi6985 Russia has lost many S-400's. Last week another S-400 battery was lost after hits from two ATACMS.
@@Rehunauris ATACMS blew up a mock-up of the s400 in Crimea, but not the installation itself; there was no explosion after the hit. But Russia, with the help of Iskander M, destroyed Ukrainian S300 and two Patriot installations many times. Compare the explosion of the S300 and the supposed ATACMS hit on the “S400” so that you don’t think about it any further.
Хорошая подделка на калибр😂
Да, хорошо на аэродромах в Бердянске и Луганске нашпиговаши сушки и вертолёты осколками 😊
@@SmertVsemKazapam не понятно, толко , что Украина забыла на территории России. 🤔
@@volvoman177 Белгород забыли в 1991 вернуть, ну ничего, это дело поправимо. Готов к очередной могилизации после выборов? 😁
Кстати, тебе понравилась предвыборная программа пуйла в виде 5 сбитых Су-34/30С и взрыва БДК Новочеркасск с боеприпасами на борту? 😂
Ruzzaians have tasted these missiles, with 400000+ of their soldiers killed.
its a big flying dong!
russian iskander missile is best than the atacms
Yes, but its cost is also 2 times higher