Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.

Why It's So Difficult to Build a Ballistic Missile

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 17 сер 2017
  • If you ever get nervous about missile attacks, they're actually a lot harder to make than you might think. To hopefully put your mind more at ease, Hank is here to talk about the work that goes into designing and building ICBMs in this new episode of SciShow!
    SciShow has a spinoff podcast! It's called SciShow Tangents. Check it out at www.scishowtangents.org
    ----------
    Support SciShow by becoming a patron on Patreon: / scishow
    ----------
    Dooblydoo thanks go to the following Patreon supporters: Kevin Bealer, Mark Terrio-Cameron, KatieMarie Magnone, Patrick Merrithew, D.A. Noe, Charles Southerland, Fatima Iqbal, Sultan Alkhulaifi, Nicholas Smith, Tim Curwick, Alexander Wadsworth, Scott Satovsky Jr, Philippe von Bergen, Bella Nash, Chris Peters, Patrick D. Ashmore, Piya Shedden, Charles George
    ----------
    Looking for SciShow elsewhere on the internet?
    Facebook: / scishow
    Twitter: / scishow
    Tumblr: / scishow
    Instagram: / thescishow
    ----------
    Sources:
    fas.org/nuke/intro/missile/ba...
    www.britannica.com/technology...
    www.38north.org/2017/08/jschil...
    fas.org/nuke/intro/missile/ic...
    www.washingtonpost.com/news/w...
    www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-pa...
    www.businessinsider.com/north-...
    www.washingtonpost.com/world/...
    www.livescience.com/5752-hard...
    thebulletin.org/pyongyang-can-...
    www.space.com/19601-how-inter...
    www.38north.org/2015/02/jlewis...
    www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/co...
    www.britannica.com/technology...
    www.latimes.com/world/la-fg-no...
    www.nti.org/analysis/articles/...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,7 тис.

  • @SciShow
    @SciShow  7 років тому +1138

    We had a distracting glitch in our last upload, so this is a re-upload from a few minutes ago. Thank you so much to those of you who pointed it out!

    • @Robert-we6oc
      @Robert-we6oc 7 років тому +7

      Ya yeet

    • @vedymin1
      @vedymin1 7 років тому +32

      We thought for a second that NK nuked your HQ :)

    • @ethanormond
      @ethanormond 7 років тому +6

      SciShow Damn North Koreans!!!!

    • @CentralCAhomie
      @CentralCAhomie 7 років тому +4

      thats the pentagon not wanting you to tell the turth. jk its google agenda

    • @BrokebackBob
      @BrokebackBob 7 років тому

      SciShow Hank, what exactly is freaking out too much?

  • @allanrichardson1468
    @allanrichardson1468 5 років тому +359

    The easiest ICBM to build: a rock thrown across the Bosporus in Istanbul. It’s a missile, it’s ballistic, and it crosses a boundary between continents!

    • @RR-us2kp
      @RR-us2kp 5 років тому +76

      And if it hits the right person, it might even start a war. It ticks all the icbm boxes

    • @SimplifiedFinanceSiFi
      @SimplifiedFinanceSiFi 5 років тому +13

      can do the same between russia alaska island

    • @sasmac1829
      @sasmac1829 4 роки тому

      😂😂😂😂

    • @mikeoxsmal8022
      @mikeoxsmal8022 4 роки тому +3

      @trevenman missile is a weapon that is shot /thrown even a stick van be a missile

    • @DzinkyDzink
      @DzinkyDzink 4 роки тому

      @@RR-us2kp but ICBMs are meant to stop wars...

  • @TheLittlekuribohfan
    @TheLittlekuribohfan 7 років тому +1782

    Hank was definitely put on a watchlist while he was researching this.

    • @fatetestarossa2774
      @fatetestarossa2774 7 років тому +2

      indeed jijijijiijijiijijijiijijijiij

    • @mer7cer7
      @mer7cer7 7 років тому +51

      Stop Hank! The North Koreans are watching this!

    • @hdaalpo
      @hdaalpo 7 років тому +18

      not sure they track Wikipedia that well. Knowledge is one thing, but doing it is sooo much harder.(And easier to notice.)

    • @andy56duky
      @andy56duky 7 років тому +69

      John Smith
      NSA: *laughs in surveillance*
      USA: *laughs in freedom*
      North Korea: *laughs in Supreme fat ass*
      South Korea: *laughs in cosmic surgery and kimchi*
      Canada: *laughs in maple syrup*
      Australia: *laughs in everything is trying to kill you*

    • @brianle2147
      @brianle2147 7 років тому +5

      cosmic surgery is an album from 2011

  • @fearlessleader343
    @fearlessleader343 7 років тому +2090

    Thank you for this very important information!

  • @WarpedPerception
    @WarpedPerception 7 років тому +25

    Very nicely explained !

  • @PaleGhost69
    @PaleGhost69 7 років тому +1175

    Why are icbms so hard? I think it has something to do with their shape.

    • @paperitgel98
      @paperitgel98 7 років тому +190

      PaleGhost69 they have to be pointy

    • @davidzhiluozhang6205
      @davidzhiluozhang6205 7 років тому +170

      paperitgel98 round is not scary

    • @halseylynn5161
      @halseylynn5161 7 років тому +103

      "Round would just bounce off"

    • @DeliveryMcGee
      @DeliveryMcGee 7 років тому +25

      Fun fact: some ICBMs (including the Atlas mentioned in my other comment) weren't hard in that sense -- it was held up by the pressure in the fuel tanks (replaced by pressurized nitrogen as the fuel burned), if the tanks were punctured it'd collapse. Which, uh, now that I think about it, is exactly the same mechanism, isn't it? :p

    • @davidzhiluozhang6205
      @davidzhiluozhang6205 7 років тому +18

      Halsey Lynn it needs to stick into the ground

  • @listenherejack
    @listenherejack 7 років тому +23

    "I'm not going to go into specifics, for obvious reasons."
    Kim Jong Un: "Damn!"

  • @Evghenios79
    @Evghenios79 6 років тому +559

    You have just accelerated N Korea's missile program by 5 years!

    • @ghazanhussain2070
      @ghazanhussain2070 6 років тому +14

      Gene Constantinou Are you in 5th grade?

    • @Evghenios79
      @Evghenios79 6 років тому +73

      What propelled you to think I was serious about the statement above?

    • @AndTecks
      @AndTecks 6 років тому +52

      Funny when an idiot calls someone an idiot.

    • @CarFreeSegnitz
      @CarFreeSegnitz 6 років тому +7

      NK has verifiably tested serveral underground nukes. NK also verifiably put an object into orbit... not quite as hard as delivering a warhead on the tip of an ICBM but close.
      What will accelerate NK's nuke program us to threaten it with imminent attack. What is likely to defuse the program is to tie trade relations directly to the state of their program. More program = less trade.

    • @keegansmetanko3755
      @keegansmetanko3755 5 років тому +1

      Gene Constantinou they are still 30 years behind

  • @RH0DI
    @RH0DI 7 років тому +71

    I mean, if I can do it in KSP, it can't be that hard, right?

    • @myrmecologistjp9228
      @myrmecologistjp9228 5 років тому +5

      I made one in KSP with RSS and RO and it burned up in reentry , even that it had a lunar capable heat shield, but probably in stock it will be much easier.

    • @akbarputraa7574
      @akbarputraa7574 4 роки тому +1

      @@myrmecologistjp9228 my icbm went to mun...

    • @krishnannarayanan8819
      @krishnannarayanan8819 3 роки тому

      @@akbarputraa7574 you are playing on stock solar system,not rss/ro

  • @user-jm8sy5ox2j
    @user-jm8sy5ox2j 7 років тому +17

    Pretty crazy how they made an ICBM in the 1950's and 1960's with the technology they had back then

  • @larry5289
    @larry5289 7 років тому +242

    Instructions unclear. ICBM stuck in North Korea :(

  • @JonatasAdoM
    @JonatasAdoM 7 років тому +20

    "Some even farther" Yes one of them got us to the moon.

  • @jecplays3638
    @jecplays3638 7 років тому +11

    It's reassuring knowing that Hank knows more about ICBMs than North Korean scientists

    • @gorkskoal9315
      @gorkskoal9315 3 роки тому

      lol not exactly a highbar. Relatively speaking. They could also just ("just"), pull a The Donald and get enough americans or who ever pissed off and let them do your work for you. Now you can also send them a rick roll video and burnt bacon.

  • @an1mesh
    @an1mesh 7 років тому +570

    Does it need to be pointy? Cause it looks scary.!

    • @iz723
      @iz723 7 років тому +71

      No, some people make it into a giant cube.

    • @NiumeLTU
      @NiumeLTU 7 років тому +8

      Why planes are pointy???

    • @thanatossevious1046
      @thanatossevious1046 7 років тому +33

      No, They need to have a round tip.

    • @gotbread2
      @gotbread2 7 років тому +86

      If they weren't pointy, there would be no point to it.

    • @dejandejan6386
      @dejandejan6386 7 років тому +50

      otherwise it will just bounce off!

  • @mineman2142
    @mineman2142 7 років тому +7

    Im going to also point out that nukes and H bombs are generally detonated quite far above the ground. If you go for a large depleted uranium slug instead of a bomb then it can cause similar damage without the radiation fallout of a nuke, the difference being that it needs to go faster, it needs more mass, and it actually has to hit the ground and not break apart during reentry.

  • @lanceawatt
    @lanceawatt 5 років тому +3

    These ICBM''s sound great! Hope to see every country can use these in abundance on one another.

  • @verdatum
    @verdatum 7 років тому +3

    This is a wonderful idea for a topic. This is exactly why I happily support you on Patreon. Keep up the wonderful work, thank you!

  • @writerpatrick
    @writerpatrick 6 років тому +10

    "Why is it so hard to buld an ICBM?"
    Are you trying to build an ICBM?

    • @NathanWakeman
      @NathanWakeman 3 роки тому +1

      Yes. The parts are just sitting in my backyard.

  • @dyer308
    @dyer308 7 років тому +142

    North korean scientists lowkey watching this video, taking notes

    • @gabrielgarcia9822
      @gabrielgarcia9822 6 років тому +10

      you cant, they have the slowest internet
      and kin jon un only allows 12 approved websites
      REPLY

    • @venenop.4147
      @venenop.4147 5 років тому

      Sure man a bunch a Korean genius watch UA-cam videos trying to figure out how to make a missile im sure a lot of countries have them they just keep it in secret because you know how USA like to put there nose the soonest they dont like something and nuclear missile is one of them for sure.

    • @alaminmalik179
      @alaminmalik179 4 роки тому

      They don't have UA-cam though

    • @doodleboi7034
      @doodleboi7034 3 роки тому

      @@alaminmalik179 Or DONT THEY?????

    • @alaminmalik179
      @alaminmalik179 3 роки тому

      @@doodleboi7034 what?

  • @trummi_app
    @trummi_app 7 років тому +20

    after watching this video I am now highly qualified to be a rocket scientist in North Korea

  • @DigGil3
    @DigGil3 7 років тому +20

    It was cool when the Black Mesa East people renovated that ICBM and launched it into the Citadel.

    • @9Mystere9
      @9Mystere9 7 років тому +1

      Shard_Piece Was that in Half-Life 3? I get them mixed up.

    • @krashd
      @krashd 7 років тому

      HL2 Episode 2 ;)

    • @sharcc2511
      @sharcc2511 7 років тому

      That was white forest.
      But some of the research was in BME

    • @DigGil3
      @DigGil3 7 років тому

      Well, should have called them the "rebels", then.

  • @jho4832
    @jho4832 4 роки тому +4

    Please post a blueprint with all the specs for an ICBM. I would like to build one during my breaks from work.

  • @lukaslambs5780
    @lukaslambs5780 7 років тому

    Thanks for everything you do, love all content from you and your brother!!!!

  • @Amcore123
    @Amcore123 7 років тому

    I absolutely love the sheer number of sources every Scishow video comes with. That makes it so much more real than ever other fact channel I enjoy.

  • @naiduy8509
    @naiduy8509 5 років тому +4

    good evening sir, I'm so impressed your valuable information thank you sir. I have a plan for my country so help.

  • @mindnova7850
    @mindnova7850 7 років тому +5

    NICE JOB!

  • @tondriasanders6306
    @tondriasanders6306 4 роки тому

    Hank, ever the upbeat optimist. Thank you for the reassurance 😊

  • @itachiuchiha6463
    @itachiuchiha6463 7 років тому

    You know what to make a video on sci show... That's why we love you ;)

  • @ferrari8595
    @ferrari8595 7 років тому +113

    Koreans probs learnt the most ever about icbms from this vid

    • @tadferd4340
      @tadferd4340 7 років тому +8

      ferrari8595 You can't make nuclear ICBMs with just the basic concepts from this video. They already know them anyway.

    • @krashd
      @krashd 7 років тому +11

      Actually the ruling elite in NK will likely have internet, the citizens however have a nationwide intranet.

    • @mechasentai
      @mechasentai 7 років тому

      ferrari8595
      Yeah they still use Fax machines to communicate with the US. Look it up lol

    • @topelzmrzovalnik
      @topelzmrzovalnik 6 років тому

      Dont underestimate the power of NK. This is the biggest mistake that the west does

    • @vatarants
      @vatarants 6 років тому +1

      They have internet but they lack of brainpower
      Few people in their country can get access to real knowledge.

  • @rizwanmsuya1446
    @rizwanmsuya1446 7 років тому +103

    Serious question: Can the nukes destroy the white walkers plus the night king?

    • @krashd
      @krashd 7 років тому +17

      Only if the tamper between the primary fission layer and the hydrogen fusion layer is made of dragon glass. You know nothing, Rizwan Snow? ;D

    • @childeater7327
      @childeater7327 6 років тому +2

      Rizwan Msuya it could potentially change the climate beyond the wall

    • @GottfriedLeibnizYT
      @GottfriedLeibnizYT 6 років тому

      Um, YES.

    • @rusdanibudiwicaksono1879
      @rusdanibudiwicaksono1879 6 років тому +5

      "The Skinwalker was too much for my magic. Thankfully, a nuclear test on Nevada was scheduled that day "

    • @maxxxstrong4577
      @maxxxstrong4577 6 років тому

      Rizwan Msuya The 🐉 are Nukes.

  • @Adomas_B
    @Adomas_B 3 роки тому

    Your tutorial worked super well, thanks!

  • @JoshKeatonFan
    @JoshKeatonFan 7 років тому

    Wow that was very interesting!

  • @massimookissed1023
    @massimookissed1023 7 років тому +12

    Wouldn't it just be way easier to use FedEx ?

    • @cpob2013
      @cpob2013 2 роки тому

      The unit patch for the minuteman missle crews is the dominos pizza logo.
      The dots are replaced with a missile, the text is "minuteman III" and its ringed saying "worldwide delivery in 30 minutes or less"

  • @andreymaels2
    @andreymaels2 4 роки тому +4

    I saw one near the Moscow on the wheels like Topol M it s longitude is longer than my 9flor block house

  • @brucefrizzell4221
    @brucefrizzell4221 4 роки тому

    Thank you for the subtitles .

  • @ethelwaldo
    @ethelwaldo 6 років тому

    Love it! As an Air Defender in the US Army, your video is very good. Don't freak out it is harder than it seems...

  • @arthurgeorge5474
    @arthurgeorge5474 4 роки тому +3

    Poland: "so what I'm getting is...
    I can into space? 😲"

  • @spencert94
    @spencert94 7 років тому +33

    not gonna go into details for obvious reasons.. like people might try to make they're own nuclear weapons at home, or north korea is going to discover how to build nuclear weapons because of this video lmao

    • @BigBeowolf
      @BigBeowolf 6 років тому +6

      Nah, more like it is literal rocket science and will take forever to detail in a video.

    • @David-ud9ju
      @David-ud9ju 6 років тому +5

      The reason they didn't go into detail is because they don't know. The researchers at SciShow aren't knowledgeable enough to understand how to do that. That's PhD level.

    • @hp2084
      @hp2084 6 років тому

      Also they call it thermonuclear ICBM when ICBM is just a missile, carrier whereas the warhead which is thermonuclear. And may it be ICBM, MRBM or SRBM the main issue and challenge is telemetry which is way harder to calculate and plot rather then making bombs.

    • @DoomFinger511
      @DoomFinger511 5 років тому

      No, they left out the incredibly difficult process of creating weaponized nuclear energy. Making the missile is the easy part. It's the warhead that takes massive amounts of money, labor and science to create.

  • @vrendus522
    @vrendus522 6 років тому

    Really good synopsis. Thank you

  • @WizzyFilms
    @WizzyFilms 5 років тому +1

    Your thumbnail is of the peacekeeper missles displayed at F.E. Warren AFB in my hometown of Cheyenne Wyoming. Neat.

  • @na____________
    @na____________ 7 років тому +4

    1:57 misspelled "accelerate" :(

  • @sellers737
    @sellers737 4 роки тому +14

    Building ICMBs are easy. I learned how to do it over the weekend using Skillshare

    • @Mental_Illboy
      @Mental_Illboy 4 роки тому

      Can you build a thermonuclear bomb? You don't have to use a ICBM if you build the bomb at the location where you want to detonate it.

  • @JohnmillerPowerlifting
    @JohnmillerPowerlifting 6 років тому

    I love how you explained this

  • @DaKnightsofawesome
    @DaKnightsofawesome 3 роки тому +1

    I always wondered what was so hard about building an intercontinental ballistic missile thanks.

  • @engineerahmed7248
    @engineerahmed7248 5 років тому +3

    The easiest way is to slingshot missile into space using an already drilled hole for an empty reservoir oil rig, saving a ton of fuel.

  • @Atristiel
    @Atristiel 7 років тому +2

    When Force becomes Forc, world will tremble.
    If you're observant enough, you'll get it.

    • @aszher
      @aszher 6 років тому

      Accelrate too

  • @pierrevillemaire-brooks4247
    @pierrevillemaire-brooks4247 6 років тому

    Hank i like your sense of humour and also how thorough you are when presenting us any topic. You have the nag of telling us all the pros and cons about the subject at hand. About nuclear weapons, the only way i was able to make peace with them was to think that the last reason we have to keep them around (and even perfect them) is to protect ourselves from the eventuality of a giant meteor colliding with earth, but even that method might turn out to be in vain because bombs in the vacuum of space have much less efficiency. Thanks for all those SciShow episodes and i hope your team will keep producing more of these on a regular basis. DFTBA :-)

  • @coffeewind4409
    @coffeewind4409 7 років тому

    Finally an answer for my question. I've been having trouble with this

  • @viniciuscabral9752
    @viniciuscabral9752 7 років тому +3

    They have nukes
    We have memes

  • @sithlordmaster181
    @sithlordmaster181 7 років тому +26

    "I'm not going to go into very much detail about this for obvious reasons"...yeah, because if you explained it more I'd suddenly have the means to build a nuclear weapon.

    • @justaknight4719
      @justaknight4719 7 років тому +5

      sithlordmaster181 You forget the most difficult part, access to uranium/parts and the cost of it.

    • @cartman19892
      @cartman19892 5 років тому +1

      Well that's just his way to say "I don't know"

    • @fi4re
      @fi4re 4 роки тому

      Only a Sith deals in absolutes. I will do what I must.

    • @LT89NL
      @LT89NL 4 роки тому +3

      @@justaknight4719 Exactly. The knowledge needed to produce an inefficient but working A-bomb has been publicly available for around half a century, and I would imagine that for a number of years by now the same holds true for H-bombs. Somewhere during the 70's the US government handed an assignment to an average university student who was randomly picked: try to design a functioning A-bomb within 4 weeks, and by exclusively using publicly available knowledge such as books from his (university) library as his source. Once he had finished the assignment his design and calculations would be reviewed by a nuclear physicist who had experience in actual nuclear weapons design, to determine if the design made by the student was actually viable and functioning. As you probaply figured out already the device the student has designed would have worked, and with a fission efficiency comparable to that off the first nuclear weapons.
      And like you correctly mentioned, the only factor which prevents people, organisations, or nations from building them is the difficulty of producing enough of a fissionable isotope for a bomb, and at a high enough purity. Even a nation such as North-Korea, which although one of the least developed and most backwards countries on earth, nonetheless still has plenty of resources and has poured a lot of money into it, yet it took them half a dozen tries before they managed to produce a reasonably functioning and efficient nuclear bomb. So the last thing to worry about would be nuclear proliferation thanks to a UA-cam video....

    • @ousarlxsfjsbvbg8588
      @ousarlxsfjsbvbg8588 4 роки тому

      LT89NL you could provide more information on this? Possible a link? It’s sounds like a really interesting story.

  • @derekschmidt2703
    @derekschmidt2703 7 років тому

    Youre awesome Hank!

  • @MCSteve_
    @MCSteve_ 7 років тому +1

    Damn it Hank, don't give them intel, cause this is totally new and top secret information

  • @lillilith8568
    @lillilith8568 7 років тому +143

    Real ICBMs have LAYERS

  • @bulman07
    @bulman07 4 роки тому +5

    Also worth specifying they’re not fired _at_ their target like a conventional missile, they’re fired into space and fall on their target in a ballistic trajectory

  • @josephrapoza6453
    @josephrapoza6453 4 роки тому

    SciShow is one of the best UA-cam video makers ever.

  • @paulF60m23
    @paulF60m23 7 років тому

    I love hank. His mannerisms/expressions are so funny.

  • @Cypher791
    @Cypher791 7 років тому +102

    This explains why my ICBMs never seem to work

    • @Redsoxking
      @Redsoxking 7 років тому +6

      Cypher791 you need Jesus

    • @Cypher791
      @Cypher791 7 років тому +15

      who is jesus?

    • @Redsoxking
      @Redsoxking 7 років тому +2

      jesus is not anything, but Jesus is the person who will save you butt!
      edit sentence structure.

    • @Cypher791
      @Cypher791 7 років тому +11

      yah il ask for forgiveness on my deathbed but in the mean time i wont worry about it =]

    • @Redsoxking
      @Redsoxking 7 років тому +1

      You do you you need to accept Jesus that is all that matters

  • @kitkatz159
    @kitkatz159 7 років тому +8

    I bet William osman can build a icbm b4 North Korea with only his laser cutter and some plywood

  • @item6931
    @item6931 6 років тому

    this guy knows his stuff. good vid

  • @abdobedo9428
    @abdobedo9428 7 років тому

    Awesome job Hank

  • @yeahrightbear8883
    @yeahrightbear8883 7 років тому +5

    I just had an intercontinental bowel movement while watching this video.

  • @fromrctorealthing5299
    @fromrctorealthing5299 6 років тому +10

    Germans are modern fathers of ICBM s V2

    • @lordofpossums5750
      @lordofpossums5750 3 роки тому +1

      No, actually. V2 was fairly short ranged. The first icbm, the R7, was made after that by the Russians.

  • @HaukLanglo
    @HaukLanglo 6 років тому

    I love the mix of science and hardcore on this chanel.

  • @xsto01
    @xsto01 6 років тому

    Thank you so much I was having problems with my ICBM but now it works...😄

  • @Mental_Illboy
    @Mental_Illboy 5 років тому +3

    That's why it's best to build a thermonuclear bomb at the place you want to detonate it. Saves you building a ICBM.

  • @rudde7251
    @rudde7251 7 років тому +151

    "I'm not going into too much detail about this for obvious reasons", like the North-Korean nuclear physicists who have made functional nuclear bomb don't know more about nuclear physics then American entertainer and educator Hank Green.

  • @lukasposchung
    @lukasposchung 6 років тому

    Thank you for the video. ICBM do usually not count as WMD (I refer to the beginning of your video) but are often used to carry WMD. Just a detail.

  • @davidbuschhorn6539
    @davidbuschhorn6539 7 років тому +1

    Once I thought of it I couldn't stop hearing it as "I see BMs".
    "What? Like everywhere or just in the toilet? Because we've all seen that."

  • @theultimatereductionist7592
    @theultimatereductionist7592 7 років тому +19

    Inter Continental Bowel Movement? Yeah - I'd say that's pretty hard to pull off for obvious reasons.

    • @9Mystere9
      @9Mystere9 7 років тому +2

      The Ultimate Reductionist Nah, you just gotta book a flight between touching continents, like Asia and Europe. Easy peasy.

  • @spamwarrior8469
    @spamwarrior8469 7 років тому +4

    Shall we play a game?

  • @TK-hs8pt
    @TK-hs8pt 7 років тому

    Thanks for calming my nerves with cold hard facts.

  • @davidpeatling1982
    @davidpeatling1982 6 років тому +1

    (Context necessary) 2:52 "When you build your weapon the right way" ... no judgement, mad sci-I mean Dr. Rick- I mean Hank ... ;)

  • @effervescentrelief
    @effervescentrelief 7 років тому +6

    The space program was a missile program. People forget just how many rockets blew up before they got things figured out.

  • @FerrowTheFox
    @FerrowTheFox 7 років тому +3

    "...sometimes it helps to understand the things, we're kinda freaked out by."
    THIS. It pains me how many people are for example "anti-nuclear power" but don't understand an inch of what it is, how it works and what the pros and cons are. As usual, education is key.

  • @regalperchenko4770
    @regalperchenko4770 5 років тому +1

    ICBM = I see a Bowel Movement coming. If someone fires an ICBM at you, then you are guaranteed to have a Bowel Movement. This is a known fact. An Inter Continental Bowel Movement. Guaranteed!

  • @kirigayakazuto5694
    @kirigayakazuto5694 5 років тому +1

    great!!!

  • @DeadBaron
    @DeadBaron 7 років тому +162

    It's not hard if you have people that know what they're doing, a large scientific community, and a stable economy to fund development. It's why so many first world nations that can fund ICBM programs have built so many. NK can't afford to even feed their people, much less attract or nourish local scientists to design ICBMs, or engineers skilled enough to build them, or ways to efficiently mine/develop the resources required.
    That's just the ICBM. Then you have everything needed for efficient nuclear warheads.

    • @ronaldbronson1285
      @ronaldbronson1285 7 років тому +10

      Dead Baron Spot on! However, North Korea might have trouble
      but they're buddy buddy with China who I suspect might be assisting their program in one way or another. Although China did tell North Korea that they didn't wanna be friends anymore if they couldn't play nicely with the good ol U.S.A.

    • @seasong7655
      @seasong7655 7 років тому +12

      Uhmm you know they already built these, right?!

    • @DeadBaron
      @DeadBaron 7 років тому +6

      seasong Not reliably, however, and not in many numbers. Can the ones they have now launch successfully, guide successfully, and detonate reliably? With their track record and how they only recently had minor success, so far the evidence says no. For now.

    • @DarthObscurity
      @DarthObscurity 7 років тому

      ...... Yet they have already tested 2?

    • @Michael-yc9ex
      @Michael-yc9ex 7 років тому +11

      UN just gave NK a couple million dollars to help feed their starving people. Guess where that went instead.

  • @Robert-we6oc
    @Robert-we6oc 7 років тому +90

    Why do stinkbugs stink?!

  • @BensLab
    @BensLab 7 років тому

    Knowledge is power. People need this kind of thing to assuage their paranoia somewhat. Thanks.

  • @whoisthenubz9132
    @whoisthenubz9132 6 років тому

    While we were celebrating July 4th (Independence Day), North Korea was testing their first ICBMs. Classic!

  • @jeak3250
    @jeak3250 5 років тому +3

    Germany did this 80 years ago lol

    • @adambaker4745
      @adambaker4745 4 роки тому +3

      Germany did your mom 80 years ago

  • @NoJusticeNoPeace
    @NoJusticeNoPeace 7 років тому +8

    The proposed Thor weapon is more terrifying than any ICBM. The Pentagon proposes putting mass-drivers into orbit which can fire steel rods from space with such speed that they've become superheated plasma by the time they hit the ground. It can't be intercepted, it can't be shot down, it can't be blocked, and it can be targeted at anyone or anything on the surface of the Earth.

    • @coughsyrupconnoisseur
      @coughsyrupconnoisseur 7 років тому +19

      I think kinetic bombardment is really overrated. The blast yields would be smaller or comparable to thermobaric weapons already in our arsenal, and although the response time would be unbeatable, the satellite has to already be in orbit over its target with a very very small window of opportunity - not to mention the tremendous costs that would be involved. Even with the advantage of what is essentially a fast-responding, non-interceptible thermobaric weapon, the use of conventional weapons as we deploy them today would be infinitely more cost effective.
      A satellite like that would probably also be heavily susceptible to anti-satellite weapons, too, and then what? If a plane got shot down carrying a conventional bomb, oh well - we have plenty more of both those things. But if we spend untold amounts of money and time constructing this space station only to have to blown to bits in minutes by a couple of ASAT missiles, it would arguably be the greatest waste of money, time, and effort in the US military's history.

    • @nirbhaythacker6662
      @nirbhaythacker6662 7 років тому +1

      +Zane Shute, I think you do not realize the fact that SciShow is for 5 year olds.

    • @coughsyrupconnoisseur
      @coughsyrupconnoisseur 7 років тому +2

      What, my comment can't be as serious as his? I mean, nevermind that I'm not sure 5 year olds would be wanting to learn about the intricate details of how ICBMs work, but at least don't pretend that NoJusticeNoPeace's comment doesn't exist

    • @saelwyn4081
      @saelwyn4081 7 років тому +2

      its illegal to put weapons in space, well according to a treaty anyway.

    • @nirbhaythacker6662
      @nirbhaythacker6662 7 років тому +2

      I don't get what you're trying to say, but what I meant was that NoJusticeNoPeace is dumb, and that few people realize how complex the engineering behind the ICBMs is, I'm an electrical engineer myself, I might not know all of the engineering behind the ICBMs, but I do know it is ridiculously complex and impossible to comprehend for most people.

  • @NathanWakeman
    @NathanWakeman 3 роки тому +1

    Good. I was trying to build one but it would not work. Now it can!

  • @pault2148
    @pault2148 7 років тому

    So the time to stop them is, BEFORE, they get an ICBM perfected. NOT at that time or after. So this does help us realize the quickness that this needs to happen. Thank you.

  • @error_d2c
    @error_d2c 7 років тому +129

    Tactical Nuke....
    ....INCOMIMG !!!!!

  • @Jackal
    @Jackal 7 років тому +313

    on a more lighthearted note, my boyfriend's initials are BM so when I was listening to this I felt like I made up a pet acronym for him hahaha ICBM :D

    • @huldu
      @huldu 7 років тому +14

      Is he black? Make sure he's black or you'll regret it. *wink*

    • @user-cz1pk8ru2j
      @user-cz1pk8ru2j 7 років тому +1

      Jackal Unleashed Haha lol!

    • @PaulMab9
      @PaulMab9 7 років тому +3

      Dawww :)

    • @DarthObscurity
      @DarthObscurity 7 років тому +50

      Bowel Movement

    • @FrozenLemur
      @FrozenLemur 7 років тому +17

      Can you do me a favor? Whisper 'chum in my slop hole' into his ear. Thanks.

  • @sulthan_m1938
    @sulthan_m1938 4 роки тому +2

    Me: Search on google what is ICBM
    UA-cam: Here’s an ICBM Video

  • @brianjackson3885
    @brianjackson3885 6 років тому

    So not just rocket science but chemistry and knowledge in demolitions as well

  • @SamuelLiebermann
    @SamuelLiebermann 7 років тому +5

    What are the obvious reasons? So we cannot build it in our backyard?

  • @flagpoleeip
    @flagpoleeip 7 років тому +6

    'For obvious reasons' ffs- you don't know.
    I'm an oxford educated physicist, i don't understand anymore than you do.

    • @Marvlesz
      @Marvlesz 5 років тому

      "For obvious reasons" does not mean the topic/know-how is obvious. It just means the _reasons why he won't talk about it_ are obvious.
      "oxford educated physicist" .. you sure? :)

  • @willfisher1971
    @willfisher1971 6 років тому

    Very well said. Thank you for applying logic to disuade paranoia in an age where people feed off ignorant fear facebook media stupidity. I wish more people would explain things with such calm intellect.

  • @sssssnake222
    @sssssnake222 5 років тому +2

    Why not use a liquid coolant in the cone, that can also be turned into energy when the liquid turns to steam and use it as a propellant.

    • @sssssnake222
      @sssssnake222 5 років тому

      Can't burn a bottle full of water.

    • @CyberSage796
      @CyberSage796 5 років тому

      This might sound stupid and un-applyable to rocket a scientist, but it's surely a smart idea to me, how did you think about that

    • @DoomFinger511
      @DoomFinger511 5 років тому

      Steam doesn't produce enough inertial thrust to propel a rocket that weighs 78 tons. And even if it did, without some explosive in the warhead (which is now replaced with a liquid coolant) all you've accomplished is making a really heavy and precisely aimed rock.

  • @ethanperron4834
    @ethanperron4834 7 років тому +122

    Breaking news a man by hank green has been KIDNAPPED by North Korean leader Kim Jon uuuuuuuuuun, the chubby psycho baby is demanding poor hank to build an icbm, we'll get back to you with hanks decision, coming up neighbor hood cat sprinkles is stuck in a tree!

    • @utetrahemicon
      @utetrahemicon 6 років тому +1

      ha, when you said hank green I thought Red Green & some kind of a duct tape ICBM.

    • @mcchicken4902
      @mcchicken4902 6 років тому +8

      Then he becomes iron man.

    • @davidsandell7833
      @davidsandell7833 6 років тому

      Ethan Perron: I like that name. Psycho Baby fits to a “T”.

  • @robosergTV
    @robosergTV 7 років тому +284

    Its not hard to make ICBM if Russia gives you their own.

    • @Bradgilliswhammyman
      @Bradgilliswhammyman 7 років тому +5

      For an individual, it is hard....for a nation state...it is not. In fact North Korea is pretty close to having one. They just have to leapfrog using modern technology and gps.

    • @dylanbarkhuizen7227
      @dylanbarkhuizen7227 7 років тому +4

      No evidence.

    • @Jetsetlemming
      @Jetsetlemming 7 років тому +21

      This never happened. After the Cuban Missile Crisis, the USSR didn't spread nuclear weapons to any other country outside actual USSR member states.

    • @meowow140
      @meowow140 7 років тому

      OoOOoOoooIHhhHHHHH

    • @oliverlaw02
      @oliverlaw02 7 років тому +1

      North Korea missile parts linked to Ukraine www.ft.com/content/546d01ae-80fc-11e7-94e2-c5b903247afd

  • @louisnapolitano
    @louisnapolitano 5 років тому

    I am getting less scared thanks Hank

  • @heshansandeepa9471
    @heshansandeepa9471 Рік тому

    After 5 years, this appeared on my recommended list for no reason.

  • @misterpepe488
    @misterpepe488 7 років тому +4

    If it's hard for more than 4 hours call a doctor.

  • @richardvanwinkle2391
    @richardvanwinkle2391 7 років тому +10

    I was a MT in the navy. I worked on and maintained the D-5 trident 2 missile. Yeah i worked on the biggest baddest weapon system ever devised. I could tell you how they work. lol

    • @coughsyrupconnoisseur
      @coughsyrupconnoisseur 7 років тому

      Say, if what you say is true, how did you become a missile technician after you enlisted? I've considered joining the Navy after high school and was interested in that position as I'm pretty interested in/fascinated by nuclear weapons.

    • @lynneprice4014
      @lynneprice4014 7 років тому +1

      Richard Vanwinkle lol possibly but how to make one your useless probably

    • @richardvanwinkle2391
      @richardvanwinkle2391 7 років тому +2

      Zane Shute That was the job I picked before I joined. You pick your job based on asvab score

    • @slappy8941
      @slappy8941 6 років тому

      Lynne Price *You're* useless at English composition...

    • @ktugaoen
      @ktugaoen 6 років тому

      Like we care????

  • @fcycles
    @fcycles 7 років тому

    never saw a video getting outdated that fast. Time to get the 2nd part...

  • @BM-ku8fv
    @BM-ku8fv 5 років тому

    Thank you