Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs Falken Azenis FK520

In depth comparison of Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S vs Falken Azenis FK520 with key results such as dry, wet, noise and rolling resistance evaluated.
For more details, please check out the link below:
toptirereview....

[@jockmarshall7601]

Getting a set of Falken FK520 fitted to me BMW 118i tomorrow. Saving nearly $400 overall.

[@dhiquobgnaloo]

I have just got a quote for both these tyres and in Australia the Falken is over $200 per tyre cheaper ,so value for money the Falken wins for me.

[@erdincyaz4359]

I just bought a audi 2024 A3 facelift.tyres are 225 45 r17 91 y Falken FK520. first impression is very very quiet when I compare I sold Audi A3 2022 with Brigestone turanza... It was nightmare that ı can't hea anyone in the car. all cabin noise was inside the car.

[@kadsennecher5087]

Set of Falkens about 100 bucks cheaper btw

[@tt-rs1457]

FK520 is very quiet.
Normaly drivon Michelin, but there was nothing on the market in 20"
I like the Falken, they did a great job

[@toptirereview]

yup FK520 has an advantage in noise

[@MonkeyMD3]

They made the fk520 softer & worse handling than the fk510

[@ioannisstavrou2677]

Not correct! What you feel it’s because falken 520 not absorbing anomalies of road good like for example the Michelin. Michelin last 70k miles around even for 20-21 inch rim and absorb very well anomalies of road. Falken 520 have pressure issues. It’s changing pressure easily from heat & cold while Michelin handle the pressure from rapid climate changes a lot better. So 510 it was a bit stiffer that 520 because they remove 10% total weight without cover the scenario of road anomalies fully. But 520 outperforms Pirelli, Yokohama, continental, Bridgestone, Hankook but not Michelin & Dunlop. Michelin is the absolute perfection