Canon EOS 1DX Mark II VS Nikon D5 (Head 2 Head) Which Is Better? Shocking Results!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 23 сер 2024
- Canon EOS 1DX Mark II VS Nikon D5. Which is better? Watch to find out! The Canon 1DX MK2 is a great camera! How do they compare to the Sony A7 iii or A7iii?
------------Buy The Gear We Review Below-------------
---Amazon--
Buy Canon 1DX Mark II (body only): amzn.to/2cDUm4O
Buy Canon 1DX Mark II w/free Kit: amzn.to/2cksa6r
Buy CFast Cards: amzn.to/2d75urR
Buy Nikon D5 (XQD): amzn.to/2c9dHwC
Buy Nikon D5 (CF): amzn.to/2cLV2mq
Buy XQD Cards: amzn.to/2cClQHw
Buy CF Cards: amzn.to/2ctzAS8
Buy Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 USM II Lens: amzn.to/1k3kq6X
Buy Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8: amzn.to/13jmn1O
---B&H Photo & Video--
Buy Canon 1DX Mark II (body only): bhpho.to/2cVyj7n
Buy Canon 1DX Mark II w/free Kit: bhpho.to/2cMRlPT
Buy CFast Cards: bhpho.to/2d78Wmj
Buy Nikon D5 (XQD): bhpho.to/2cCMVs2
Buy Nikon D5 (CF): bhpho.to/2cfiCab
Buy XQD Cards: bhpho.to/2dt2NkG
Buy CF Cards: bhpho.to/2d1pZXX
Buy Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 USM II Lens: bhpho.to/1fB21uI
Buy Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8: bhpho.to/10yeARM
---Adorama--
Buy Canon 1DX Mark II (body only): bit.ly/2d1qTUu
Buy Canon 1DX Mark II w/free Kit: bit.ly/2d1rxBd
Buy CFast Cards: bit.ly/2cMSOG6
Buy Nikon D5 (XQD): bit.ly/2cfhTpH
Buy Nikon D5 (CF): bit.ly/2chU16E
Buy XQD Cards: bit.ly/2d0po6M
Buy CF Cards: bit.ly/2cdLS0b
Buy Canon 24-70mm f/2.8 USM II Lens: bit.ly/1LBNIWS
Buy Nikon 24-70mm f/2.8: bit.ly/132YxHw
---------Support Us By Purchasing Gear From These Links-----------
Amazon: amzn.to/15SloMU
B&H Photo & Video: bhpho.to/15S5P8a
Adorama: bit.ly/YJqrfR
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
--- Rent All Your Photography/Videography Gear Below---
bit.ly/1sqEjZN - Навчання та стиль
1DX MkII is great for night photography and everything else... like if you agree!
Great video, after listening to the pros cons for each camera, I would be more than happy with either one.
Best 1D vs D5 on youtube.
Well done.Worth the wait.
When he starts to talk about canons white balance, I realized that he is a nikon fan boy, I love nikon theyre much more sharper and has better dynamic range than canons in general, but I shot people, I shot editorials weddings and so on, so of course I stick with Canon for its better skin tone and color reproduction, saves a lot of time in the editing, especially when you shot like 1k pics at once. For me, the ISO comparison beyond 6400 is quite pointless, I've never shoot with ISO beyond 3200 with my 5d mk iii
Nikon is better with photography.
Hey I was just watching your video what is the Marvel cinema or technicolor cinema that you’re talking about. I’m trying to find a way to get kind of C log or Canon log profile into my 1DX MK II
Hey Marc. I have a profile available I created a c log that works with 1dx mark 2. I used it on mine as well. Look for my c log videos on the channel. Link to download is there too
Did you say the D5 has a more advanced auto focusing system than the 1DX Mark II?
Granny panning @ 3:50
Another fantastic video guys. I Love the New York City background, lots of BOKEH! looking forward to more head to head comparisons.
The auto-focus points in both cameras cover the exact same amount of space in the frame, additionally Canon has dual-pixel auto-focus, he didn't mention that which is one of the best things the 1DX II has. So for me this review is not objective.
Manuel Rendon well, he said the 1dx is better in video 4k...
d5 is great for night photography... like if you agree!!
D5 is a great camera, but how often will you go up to 400,000 ISO.
nikon d5 goes up to 3,280,000(3.2 million )ISO
Maybe
the next camera they can have it go to 5.2 billion so spec sheet fans can brag that up.
+Sripal TAD well, it can be a trumpillion ISO (the greatest and the most terrific number in the universe), but what is the point if your images will look like garbage.
atleast it has it and by way better iso perf than any other DSLR
The Canon allows users to customize the delete button to hover over "cancel" by default or "delete" which makes deleting an image very easy. Use the scroll wheel next time and get economical with your finger movements. You can even customize the zoom button to zoom in 100% to the AF point. See it's out of focus and press "delete-set" and never mover your fingers. Reviewing and deleting images on a Canon is a very strong point of the camera, few reviewers explore customizing anything beyond shooting features.
How about assigning AI-Servo to AF-ON and then One-Shot to the * button? And being able to customize those parameters such as which zone or Servo function...amazing stuff that catapults the 1DX2 over the Nikon.
With more seat time on the Canon you may find it to be a much more user friendly experience. Seems the only people that think Nikons are better laid out are Nikon shooters and everyone else thinks Canons are. The backlit buttons would be nice on occasion, however!
That was really nice. My mom and I enjoyed the video. Thanks for sharing
Been waiting for this video! Excellent video!
THIS battle was INTENSE !!
Hi! What kind of color grading have you done on the sample videos? They look awesome on both cameras!
Is the ISO performance of the D5 in Full Frame HD similar to the A7S / A7SII? Seems pretty clean to my eye.
Nikon d5 allows foolishly high iso's that look awful, it's just an advertisment gimmick for non professionals.
The pixel peepers and tech geeks. Cameras like the 1dx mii and d5 look the same at 102,400. And anything higher they just get blotchy and dirty looking.
great video my man always a great review you pull no punches and since I shoot Nikon that's the one for me, suddenly I'm craving Chinese food
Does anyone else think the Canon did better at high ISO?
very good revieuw
My last film camera was the Nikon F5 which I eventually sold to purchase a D200. Admittedly at the time the F5 was superior in every way except it wasnt digital.
Over the next 2-4 years the camera basically disappeared. The market shifted and went on an upward digital trajectory.
I'm getting the same feeling about both the 1 Dx ii and the D5. The cameras right behind them are becoming so feature rich and more affordable they're going to blow by these things probably in 2-4 years.
The a99ii just debuted shooting 12fps 42MP raw, the olymous em-1 mk ii shoots 18fps raw and 60fps grabs from video. The new gh5 is going to have 4k 60fps and internal 10bit 4:2:2.
Its just a matter of time. These cameras are incredible but their running out of time
Great points! And the people who are after speed, are doing zooms with extreme telephoto lenses, as well. Something like the new OMD EM-1 MK II with it's hyper speed, next gen features and 2x crop could be actually excellent for sports, wild life and even paparazzi .
I haven't looked at shots yet from the D5, but I've looked at plenty from the 1DX II. That camera is definitely built for speed, not photo quality. Not that the photo quality is bad, but... The smaller sensor Olympus might just equal it, if not exceed it's IQ. I recently bought the lowest end OMD to try with my PannyLeica lenses (was considering dumping m43 completely) and was shocked at how good the photos are the little cheap guy makes. Oly is impressive.
The 4K, though, from the 1DX is spectacular, and the dual pixel autofocus is equally as impressive. Still, a C300 Mark II is still perhaps worth the extra $ for video, as it's still a more integrated video package. Or perhaps a C300 as main cam and 1DX for b cam makes sense. I don't quite know. I have a bunch of camera already (included some Samsungs which autofocus almost as well as the Canons), so I decided to wait it on the video end to see what Sony introduces this year. If they don't introduce anything amazing, and if I can get my head around handling the huge 4k files from Canon, then I may just go for the C300 II and/or 1DX II. Their 4K sure is beautiful. Very filmic. Almost like a high end Panavision or Alexa cam w/ those artistic Cooke lenses.
Personally, if the em-1 lives up to its billing, i think it's on a short list of candidates for camera of the year, probably neck and neck with the GH5.
This is the issue I have with Canon, a very clear lack of confidence leads them to cripple their products in a way which actually limits their audience.
Here's the thing mjpeg is a very clear effort to protect the cinema line. But mjpeg makes workflow on the 1dx ii, a camera supposedly designed for speed, doggedly slow. So, what, you go out and shoot 11fps so you can rip through your subject matter and then leave the computer running overnight while it transcodes 15 minutes of footage? I'm exaggerating, of course.
But, someone looking at the 1dx ii is in all likelihood not a candidate for a content video camera like the c300 or c500. They want a DSLR. That's why they bought it. So give them a flexible feature set. Give them the option to shoot h.264, mjpeg or whatever they like. You're charging them more than you would for a C100. Don't be stingy.
Quite honestly, I don't know who the camera is for. If they just put the right codec in it, I would say sports shooter/writer, event shooter/filmographer. But those guys need ease of use. mjpeg is not an ease of use scenario.
I don't think commercial shooters are gonna be interested. At that price point they're gonna go ursa or ursa mini 4.6k and get 15 stops DR and proper codecs and log.
Cinema guys aren't even gonna look at it because they're gonna take the RED Raven and spend $8 or $9k and built that out and absolutely destroy this camera. Or even a BM 4.6, Kinefinity Terra 5k or 6k, all of which are at a different level in terms of video workflow.
Low light comparisons are always helpful but only tell part of the story relative to how the cameras compare to each other in daylight conditions. The absence of any daylight comparison tests is strange to say the least.
Night pictures/colour balance of D5 = shit. 1DX is warmer and most really
I haven't heard of the d5 being 2/3s stop more sensitive at the same settings. Could it be that your 2 lenses had different t-stops?
Ps. In the menu u can change the 1dx2 to not need erase confirm button, u just confirm erase by pressing erase
Love them both , but the buttons layout on the Nikon seems better for me , moreover they are backlit , I can see what I do in the dark !
I used both and I prefer the Nikon
Dude are you selling your D4 & a 50mm 1.4? I saw your post on a Nikon forum & CL. I think.
Peace Love yes indeed!
A camera should be fast, when I say fast I mean how a camera reacts to my commands. A professional chooses a camera with fantastic ergonomics.
The choice is clear in Canon ergonomics: if you're a full-time sports, news, outdoors or action pro, the 1D X mii is your camera.
the reason pros demand the 1D X mii is simple. If you work with things that don't move under nice sunny skies all day, then as soon as things start to move you need the speed of the 1D X mii, and as soon as it starts to blow... rain or snow, the 1D X mii gets going.
Canon has multiple nine buttons+two dials that can be custom set for...
(ONE TOUCH)commands to change the way your camera shoots,providing the photographer with eleven different options. Canon has dual back button options you can change the entire camera to operate as a totally different camera with register recall function.
With Nikon you get three buttons for three options in one touch control.
What good is having 150+ AF points when you can only select 55 of them. The Canon has 61 selectable AF points. What is the difference? Spot Focusing. Either camera can use any of the selectable AF points in Spot Focus mode.
The Nikon AF points have supplementary AF points that surround the selectable AF points. These supplementary AF points help to expand the coverage of the selectable AF points.
Canon has two focusing modes on an AF point, Spot Focusing and a slightly larger, normal AF point focusing mode. Spot focusing is just what it sounds like, autofocusing is a very small spot. The normal AF point mode is expanded, and larger than the spot AF point, due to an AF point that is larger overall. .
In other words the Canon AF points have the same expanded coverage feature as the Nikon AF points, but with one basic difference. Canon has 61 selectable AF points and the Nikon has 55 selectable AF points.
It is pretty obvious that we were watching a Nikon enthusiast in this video. His lack of familiarity with the Canon bodies was obvious when he compared the video. Canon uses Dual Pixel Auto Focus for video.
While he was going on about not being able to use the touch screen to focus on the Canon, he should have left it be. The Canon an refocus and track subjects in video mode, which the Nikon cannot do. Canon bodies are the only DSLRs that can autofocus with tracking in video mode.
New subscriber here! Thank you for sharing this video!
What backpack are you using in this video? I neeeeeed it.
In the street as always :) Thanks Corey! Next time you're out? Would you shoot your videographer and have him/her run through their setup/equipment? Stay safe!
great review!! any plans to review the Leica SL?
a battle for the ages and it 40min long fantastic here we go
Finally, truly unbiased comparison. Great Video!!
You seem to shoot a wedding in the morning of all your videos i've seen, where do you find the time! haha
The first memory card who leafs the camera has won .hahahahhaha.I like that.He has some fantasy.
I use both but Canon and Sony. Nikon purchased Sony sensors so why? I personally prefer Canon color science though... pick your tools and work with it, whatever suits YOUR needs :)) Happy shooting all
well done, great video
I like them both. But I am leaning towards the Nikon D5
Which mic are you using out there?
Great video! but why you like to stand in the way of the traffic.
I don't think it matters which one is better. It comes down to personal preference and if you can afford one :).
what camera did you shoot this tutorial with?
what camera was this shot with????
Spencer Bailey Sony A7s
Faymusmedia That video quality is outstanding
CCoding thanks! The A7s does look great, especially at night!
Compare to anyone, this's a great review. Thanks
Great review love the Nikon ...
which camera use you budyy
Cool hair styles
Maybe the Sony a99 II vs either canon 1dx II or Nikon d5?!
That would be a waste of video. Don't fall for specs.
The A99 II autofocus should be on par with DSLRs in its range, at least in theory.
9:50 guy in the blue dodge giving the peace sign at the camera
if you use a canon you know where the fucking buttons are lol
11:03 only reaction you can have to that *nervous laugh*
Looks like he really loves shiny buttons since he mentioned it oh-so-many-times.
17:44 when a Canon fanboy saw a Nikon guy =))
Lol
The build quality of Nikon is so much better see second hand prices
Drawbacks on both on these bricks:
1. No ATG Penta BOSS
2. Reduction/close to half frame in 4K
3. Can not save video on computer with Canon WFT/Nikon WT
4. No WiFi
5. No flexible LCD
6. Nikon can't use Canon lenses
Just move over or try testing these amateur cameras for under $4,000.00:
Sony SLT-A99 II and Olympus OM-D E-M1 II
Both have ATG Penta BOSS
WiFi plus live-view to computer
ATG Focus Peaking on all lenses
Flexible LCD
Canon/Hasselblad/Red/Leica/Olympus/Nikon lenses are compatible w/ATG Penta BOSS
Very nice review but many are switching to Sony & Olympus & Fuji.
People don't want to carry heavy brick around for hours.
Cool video but are you going to ever change your location...would have been nice if you shot some pertaining to sports.portraits, anything but NY city reviews are yawners.
why does Theora Apophasis say that the D5 is a lemon?
Hate the ergonomics of Canon cameras. Besides, the 1DX is the only professional camera they have, the 5D is a plasticy consumer camera. Nikon has three: D5, D500 and D850, all for different purposes. Heck, I keep a D3 around as a backup and its great!
Nikon D5 Awesome
D5 hands down!
That statement about one having better sensitivity is false. It is simply one brand fudging the ISO standard to make their images look better than the competition at a given ISO
For stills D5 all the way!
I see
17:44 ...pretty much sums up this whole video! lol
They are both great cameras! Coke/Pepsi. What glass have you invested in? That's the winner.
image quality isnt there on d5
Nikon is always userfriendly
Shame u never mention the far better battery life of the D5
super
9:49
If you could do the tug of war btw those cameras for what their really made for
Imagine my life with that D5. But, i'm poor. gg wp.
Do something about it !!
Well where i live, actually the D5 cost $10.000 dollars. D:
Kristofferson where do you live?
Argentina
Im sure we can all afford a D5...used In 15 years.. lol.. I always wanted a D700, now I got it for $600.00 :=) and EBAY and Amazon are the best places to get it in any country!
Canon 1DX II (iTR AF Tech) actually has the WORST AF Tracking Prediction,
when compared to Sony a9 (4D Focus) or Nikon D5 (3D Tracking)
Quote from DPreview;
Our Sony A9 initial impressions line up with these claims: every now and then the camera might lose the subject, but it very quickly returns, something we can't say about the Canon 1D X II when its "predictive algorithm fails."
Sources:
www.dpreview.com/reviews/sony-a9-first-impressions-review/4
www.dpreview.com/reviews/canon-eos-1d-x-mark-ii/10#AFExpansionFailAdj
Nikon D5
if your shooting video only you don't buy a dslr....you buy a video camera...surely lol
5:08 that nigga though
Zig have submitted
When you said "the two biggest behemoths" I thought you were going to say something about the woman at 23:13. Sorry that's where my mind went.
Really it would have been good to test both with fast moving subjects to show the amazing AF system in the D5 which beats the canon. These sort of subjects are too easy for these cameras.
Canons AUTO FOCUS has fewer focus points but Canon has different case settings like,the ability for the user to follow focus on different subjects. Whether you subject is moving erratic or moving in a constant motion. The ability to stay locked on to the subject or to focus on a subject suddenly entering the frame. And each case can be changed by the user to respond differntally for individual settings.
интересный дядька. )) Спасибо за обзор )
Like si estas viendo este video en 2019
25:38
Whats a Nick-on 😮
The Canon looks way better at higher ISO's over the Nikon.
Canon iso better
The way he says “Nikon”
Sony looks the best here 🤔
why the fuck is he pronouncing nikon as "nick-on"?
if you're shooting video, just get a video camera....
picture nikon video canon like if you agree
Bank obuenk xrongsong
It's a NI-KON not NE-KON
Freddie Slaughter no.
All the Nikon cameras you have tested so far, which is your favorite?
Seems like a Nikon fan boy. He would say something good abount Canon and then be like "well Nikon does this better" And the High ISO at 800,000 is double what canon can do. It looked like dog shit. Canon doesn't go that high because it's pointless!!! Not a good unbiased review to me. Way too into Canon.
I second that. You can clearly see his bias towards Nikon. I understand everyone has a favorite as mine is Canon but when your doing a review for a lot of people, it seems like we agree it needs to be facts and unbiased points. Not sugar coating something. Sure light up buttons are cool but your right even a week with your camera you should have the buttons down no problem. Well said
And the part about him saying the D5 can compete with Canon on video I find to be not true. Nikon has no cinema cameras whatsoever, Canon does. Personally id have to say Canon has the video secured but that's just my opinion
CrypticMediaTV He did criticise the Nikon for having pointless ISO levels. In fact, he even roasted here and there. Maybe you should fucking open your ears
TRealGz lol shut your mouth chump. I've been using the 1dx mk ii since launch day. And I've used a D5 and it blows the Nikon out of the water. And I'm not saying that because I'm a Canon fan I've used Nikon for years. But once I swapped to Canon and realized Nikon is not even in the same league there was no going back. And ya he said a couple things here and there but if you don't realize how biased he is you are the one who needs to "open up your fucking ears" 😂
He's definitely a Nikon fan girl. The Canon was better.
my friend you can't compare Canon 1DX Mark II with Nikon D5. I don't know what do you think about two different cameras . but I know every person going to the college after one year .they thinking they very professional master . every person who has Nikon or Canon they know about two different camera . so you can't compare an old horse with young horse