I have a couple of these I purchased around the year 2000 or 2001. Different box, printed in the United Kingdom but they don’t have that edge stitching on the cover. Great bibles.
Van Guard, can you send me one of those BIBLE for free? I wan't one but can't afford it. It will be much appreciated. If you can miss one with large print, I'll will be so thankfull to you also.
Nice review! I have the Cambridge Concord Reference Goatskin Bible and the Cambridge Concord Wide Margin Goatskin Bible. I love both of these Bibles. My Cambridge Concord Reference Goatskin Bible is my daily driver.
I have the calf split version of this and I like it very much it is easy to open and lays flat unlike the bindings that some of the goatskin Bibles that have the edge line rib that does not lay flat
Even with the print being inconsistent I still can say this is my favorite daily reader. But in my opinion there should be no issues with the print at this price.
The CAMBRIDGE CONCORD was my first serious BIBLE around 1969. Still have it. Waiting for a rebind possibly. Bot a new one. Still just as good. A bit harder to read at 72 age.. but all Cambridge KJV bibles have good and readable PRINT.
As far as I know, this layout is available only in the KJV. I'm like you: I'd like to see it used for several other translations. Thanks for commenting!
This Bible may be next on my list. I recently got myself the Turquoise in Red Letter and I really love that Bible! The one thing and most important thing to me is the font size. Nowadays I usually shy away from anything under a LG Print . But the Cambridge Bibles usually have bolder type fonts . Been looking for a good top quality take to church Bible and this Concord looks perfect. So my question is what’s your take on the font size on the Concord? The Thompson Chain Lg Print is a 9 pt and it’s about right I think. How do these two compare? Thanks for the review.
The font in this Concord is roughly equivalent to 9.5 pts in Times New Roman. At about the 18:20 point, I show the Concord font and Times New Roman side-by-side. I don't have a large print Thompson, so I can't comment on that. But if you want to see how the Concord compares to the Turquoise, scroll forward to 35:39.
My Personal Concord published by TBS, and my new goatskin Cambridge Concord exhibits the same print irregularity you showed in 2 Kings. I think this is related to the facsimile process and is not a printing issue, rather it's a source issue.
@@RGrantJones it is unfortunate, it's a wonderful bible. Unless I find a worse page than your example of 2 kings in mine, I'm going to keep it. I like the rest of it too much to do a return. I recently bought an Oxford old Scofield with a page that might as well have been left intentionally blank it was so light - it got sent back.
While reading the RNJB 1 John a encountered a footnote that referred to Hosea 2:22 - which is 2:20 in the KJV family of translations - and I wondered why the difference in verse numbers? Do you know?
Your concord has the same two bands in the gilding as my goatskin cameo. You can see them clearly at 1:57. Is it in all the goatskin bibles? Or is it a binding quality control issue?
Your last advise that Text of Bible should be in one book, and commentary in another is EXACTLY what I am doing. Bought Readers Bible for Reading and Study Bible for research. Bought Oxford Qur'an for Reading and Study Quran (HarperCollins) for research. Reading both texts without much footnotes and commentary will reveal the nature and content of texts. Study versions are for in depth study only.
My goatskin had glue also, that synthetic liner is very good. I like them I just was gentle and picked it off and rubbed tell it was gone. I was disappointed with the Concord ink fading esp in John chapter 3 I'm curious because all the red letters have the same fading there.I think its because of the facsimile they chose for this edition and the red ink fades there because the actual plates were worn there. Is your black text broken up through Ch3 in the Gospel of John? Thanks for sharing this one.....I'm breaking the rule I haven't finished watching yet cause this is a long one brother LOL.😉 Gotta grab the popcorn with this one.
Any longer and I'll have to start inserting an intermission, like in "The Ten Commandments" or "Lawrence of Arabia." No, in John 3 it's deep and bold. I think you're right about the fading. It's not the fault of the modern reproduction/printing technology: It's likely because they've chosen a weakly printed original to reproduce.
R. Grant Jones Agreed, Cambridge makes some of the best prints. This reminds me of the wide margin Clerandon, I know they have better prints of that text because my 7c is really nice. I've become a fan of the little Clerandon my self and the new Cambridge Turquoise, its disappointing they didn't release a black text edition😒 What is so difficult by just printing black text, I'm sure its not a money issue? I actually feel bad now when this happens because I know brothers and sisters like yourself are losing out.
I think there has to be an additional cost from making two different print runs. A publisher also has to print boxes that say "black letter" instead of "red letter" -- and sort the Bibles so they don't go into the wrong boxes. Sellers like evangelicalbible.com have to make up two web pages instead of one. But it is difficult to see how the cost of a black letter edition would be much more than the cost of carrying both goatskin and calf split. Is it possible that black letter Bibles get returned more often -- by people who thought they were buying a red letter edition? That would drive costs up. It's also possible that black letter sales are slower, which leaves stock on the shelves and stock rooms. The publishers could reason, "If we'd printed those in red letters, they'd have sold by now. And the merchants would have room to stock our newer Bibles." So it could be a turnover issue. Too bad Bible Buying Guide didn't get a chance to ask that question of Cambridge in one of his interviews of industry reps: "So, just what does Cambridge have against black letter Bibles anyway? Will you ever print another black letter Cameo, Concord, or Turquoise?"
R. Grant Jones LOL.maybe Randy should ask us about what we would like to hear😁 That just opened my eyes brother, I didn't consider all the extra cost involved with making another text.
As usual, another amazing review! No one reviews like R. Grant Jones 👍 Quick question for you sir....I understand that the layout between the Concord and the Cameo are obviously different, however, my question is...are the actual cross references and footnotes different too? I’m looking to do Bible study with my family. I want us to all be reading from the same text and able to review the same cross references and footnotes....this is the reason why. Some family members like the Concord, some the Cameo... of course, lol. Thank you again...
Thanks for those kind words, Adam. I have both the Cameo and Concord in front of me -- and if I had to vote, I think I'd chose the Cameo, even though I have old eyes. I prefer the in-verse superscripts for references, and the typeface, even though the font is too small and the lines are spaced too closely. But they're both excellent. As to your question, the translation notes seem to be the same. For instance, at John 1.12, both provide "Or, the right, or, privilege" as alternates to the word "power" in the text. As best I can tell, the references are also the same. Looking at John 1.4, the Concord cites ch. 11.25, 1 Jn 5.11, and Ch. 8.12. The Cameo cites ch. 11.25 and 1 Jn 5.11 at superscript j, and ch. 8.12 at superscript k. I spot-checked Acts 6.1 also, and the references are the same there also -- but easier to sort out in the Cameo, in my opinion, because in the Concord they break across lines. For instance, a reference to 5.14 in the Concord can have the "5." on one line and the "14" on the next.
Gotcha! I agree with you actually. I find the Cameo more of a 'traditional' expression...more my style. One more question if you don't mind...the Turquoise? This is another option I'm looking at after I watched your video. Are they the same f/n and c/r with the Turquoise as the Cameo by chance? Thank you again sir.
Yes, as far as I can tell. The Turquoise is like a large-font edition of the Cameo, but with better line spacing. The Cameo, on the other hand, is more portable.
I thought the calfskin would. I think that with time this one will relax, but I don't want to bully it. I'll try to review the TBS Westminster in the next couple of months. Hopefully, it will be a bit shorter than this review!
If it weren’t for the uneven print quality it would be my favorite version. Maybe YOU know all the words in the KJV that have changed meaning over the years but a lot of people don’t. You picked cousin as an example but how about let, letteth, replenish, suffer, prevent, etc? The glossary is a great resource.
@@ymshao - That's a good idea, but I don't own a Turquoise. I can't justify spending that much money on a red letter Bible. I do own a Church Bible Publishers Turquoise reproduction, and, based on that, I think I would prefer the Turquose over the Cameo.
First, let me say I'm not an animal hide kind of person. I'm more focused on print, paper and layout. That said, goatskin is tougher, so if you're rough on your Bibles, it's what I recommend. For myself, however, if I have a choice between a calfskin and a goatskin binding for a Bible, and both bindings are edge-lined, I'll generally pick the calfskin. I'm very gentle and careful with my Bibles, so I don't need the toughness of goatskin, and I prefer the feel of calfskin. But it's easier to find an edge-lined Bible in goatskin these days. There aren't as many edge-lined calfskins out there.
I really like my cambridge. But the inking is inconsistent. There is some pages where it loses the boldness. And even quite a few spots where the letters are quite messed up. For the price, they should be able to do better I would think. Whats outside, is not as important as whats inside. The Scripture is the star of the show, not the binding. But sadly, they have kind of become complacent on that. Mine even has words that run on. And for a book that costs 250 dollars roundabout. I find that pretty unacceptable.
I can't believe Cambridge has the audacity to charge that much money when that print' is so ununiform I got a $20 Holman and it's flawless could be a little bit more Boulder but it's crisp and has no variations in the text I think you're mainly paying for the cover
I agree. It's an eye-opener to compare the prices of goatskin and hardback editions of the same Bible. For instance, the hardback Cambridge ESV Wide-Margin is $60 at Christian Book Distributors, but they want $265 for the goatskin. And you're right about the print quality here -- disappointing.
R. Grant Jones thanks for answering back I'm also finding out that Bible stores are closing and then if you do find one there taking a dump on the King James they hardly carry any and the ones that they do carry like Thomas Nelson and stuff they have a lot of man's words in the text that's a No-No they should just have it at the top of the header I'm fine with that anything else is bunk thanks a lot for your review
David Clark, I picked up a new Nelson large print center-column ref KJV, in “comfort print”, bonded leather, for $16. The paper, print uniformity, font, and readability all blow away any of my Cambridge bibles. Sad but true. I just wish it came in a nice leather cover, but Nelson hasn’t released them yet.
I own this Bible and it imparts a little history and character of it’s own in terms of the facsimile of the letterpress original. Whether you interpret it’s imperfections as interesting, or charming, or annoying comes down to individual opinion. As for myself, I recoil from perfect, modern, digital fonts (particularly for the KJV). So-called ‘Comfort Print’ and Schuyler’s ‘Milo’ fonts leave me cold. They belong in a corporate annual report to shareholders not the Word Of God. I partly agree about hardbacks (and there ought to be more choices) but I am prepared to pay for the hand skills of bookbinders to be kept valid in this world. (Edge lining especially is a difficult and mostly manual skill.)
Other reviews of this and similar Concords: Airik1111 - ua-cam.com/video/3H9bgAiyizU/v-deo.html Gypsy Lane - ua-cam.com/video/YCtau7W-1yY/v-deo.html Bible Believing Christian - ua-cam.com/video/H_9VEMZNZFo/v-deo.html Living with Faith Bible Reviews - ua-cam.com/video/ECJsejCsla8/v-deo.html Bible Buying Guide - ua-cam.com/video/ovEZMWCd4Yg/v-deo.html Derek Yee - ua-cam.com/video/wAeMuZ8Yb3c/v-deo.html tonywalker23 - ua-cam.com/video/OMYVeRDdys8/v-deo.html PaulT - ua-cam.com/video/xNzm-Xx_Et8/v-deo.html Mtbhan96 - ua-cam.com/video/xh1bGGIeK1o/v-deo.html Bible Study - ua-cam.com/video/UKRs-GlombY/v-deo.html New Life of Albany Ga - ua-cam.com/video/bMW7zc6nVT0/v-deo.html
This Bible is available from evangelicalbible.com at evangelicalbible.com/product/cambridge-kjv-concord-reference-black-goatskin-black-letter/ From Christian Book Distributors at www.christianbook.com/kjv-concord-reference-goatskin-leather-black/9780521707961/pd/707961?event=ESRCG From Amazon: www.amazon.com/Concord-Reference-Edge-Lined-Goatskin-Leather/dp/052170796X New and used from Abe Books: www.abebooks.com/book-search/isbn/9780521707961/
I am speechless! Absolutely wonderful review! Thank you so much!
Thank you for that kind comment, Jacob!
I have a couple of these I purchased around the year 2000 or 2001. Different box, printed in the United Kingdom but they don’t have that edge stitching on the cover. Great bibles.
Were your _circa_ 2000 copies printed more evenly than this one?
Van Guard, can you send me one of those BIBLE for free? I wan't one but can't afford it. It will be much appreciated. If you can miss one with large print, I'll will be so thankfull to you also.
one of my top favorites and still desired KJV bible, a great thorough look at it.
Nice review! I have the Cambridge Concord Reference Goatskin Bible and the Cambridge Concord Wide Margin Goatskin Bible. I love both of these Bibles. My Cambridge Concord Reference Goatskin Bible is my daily driver.
Thanks for the kind comment, Mike!
@@RGrantJones
You're welcome and God Bless!
Superb review! I really appreciate your attention to detail. Very helpful.
R.GrantJones: I just watched your vlog about those awesome KJV Bible books. I loved it. Great job! Thank you. 👍🏼
I have this bible and also ordered it in a wide margin. I know FONT will be smaller but I love this BIBLE.
I think that's the best Cambridge bible made
This is probably my favorite video on the internet. You should do audiobooks lol
Thanks, Hayden!
Well done, great Bible review's like always.
God bless,
Zach
I have the Concord in goatskin and the wide margin Concord in calfskin. They are absolutely my two favorite Bibles.
Love Cambridge concord kjv bible. In its pages I found the Christ of God and in himself eternal life.
I have the calf split version of this and I like it very much it is easy to open and lays flat unlike the bindings that some of the goatskin Bibles that have the edge line rib that does not lay flat
Even with the print being inconsistent I still can say this is my favorite daily reader. But in my opinion there should be no issues with the print at this price.
The CAMBRIDGE CONCORD was my first serious BIBLE around 1969. Still have it. Waiting for a rebind possibly. Bot a new one. Still just as good. A bit harder to read at 72 age.. but all Cambridge KJV bibles have good and readable PRINT.
How do I get this exact model in NKJV.
I like the dark print, the spacing, two columns with central reference.
As far as I know, this layout is available only in the KJV. I'm like you: I'd like to see it used for several other translations. Thanks for commenting!
The CONCORD bold PRINT makes even a smaller FONT look bigger and easier to READ.
Excellent, thanx!
This Bible may be next on my list. I recently got myself the Turquoise in Red Letter and I really love that Bible! The one thing and most important thing to me is the font size. Nowadays I usually shy away from anything under a LG Print . But the Cambridge Bibles usually have bolder type fonts . Been looking for a good top quality take to church Bible and this Concord looks perfect. So my question is what’s your take on the font size on the Concord? The Thompson Chain Lg Print is a 9 pt and it’s about right I think. How do these two compare? Thanks for the review.
The font in this Concord is roughly equivalent to 9.5 pts in Times New Roman. At about the 18:20 point, I show the Concord font and Times New Roman side-by-side. I don't have a large print Thompson, so I can't comment on that. But if you want to see how the Concord compares to the Turquoise, scroll forward to 35:39.
Great video. The Westminster has 200,000 refs. It is best known for its references. Thanks again for the videos.
Thanks for the correction! You're right, of course. Someone made the same comment on my Westminster review, mere moments after I posted it.
R. Grant Jones
Not a correction, merely an addition. Great videos brother.
My Personal Concord published by TBS, and my new goatskin Cambridge Concord exhibits the same print irregularity you showed in 2 Kings. I think this is related to the facsimile process and is not a printing issue, rather it's a source issue.
That sounds plausible, and unfortunate.
@@RGrantJones it is unfortunate, it's a wonderful bible. Unless I find a worse page than your example of 2 kings in mine, I'm going to keep it. I like the rest of it too much to do a return. I recently bought an Oxford old Scofield with a page that might as well have been left intentionally blank it was so light - it got sent back.
While reading the RNJB 1 John a encountered a footnote that referred to Hosea 2:22 - which is 2:20 in the KJV family of translations - and I wondered why the difference in verse numbers? Do you know?
Your concord has the same two bands in the gilding as my goatskin cameo. You can see them clearly at 1:57.
Is it in all the goatskin bibles? Or is it a binding quality control issue?
That's a good question. If I had to guess, I'd say quality control. Thanks for commenting!
Your last advise that Text of Bible should be in one book, and commentary in another is EXACTLY what I am doing.
Bought Readers Bible for Reading and Study Bible for research.
Bought Oxford Qur'an for Reading and Study Quran (HarperCollins) for research.
Reading both texts without much footnotes and commentary will reveal the nature and content of texts. Study versions are for in depth study only.
My goatskin had glue also, that synthetic liner is very good. I like them I just was gentle and picked it off and rubbed tell it was gone.
I was disappointed with the Concord ink fading esp in John chapter 3 I'm curious because all the red letters have the same fading there.I think its because of the facsimile they chose for this edition and the red ink fades there because the actual plates were worn there.
Is your black text broken up through Ch3 in the Gospel of John?
Thanks for sharing this one.....I'm breaking the rule I haven't finished watching yet cause this is a long one brother LOL.😉
Gotta grab the popcorn with this one.
Any longer and I'll have to start inserting an intermission, like in "The Ten Commandments" or "Lawrence of Arabia." No, in John 3 it's deep and bold. I think you're right about the fading. It's not the fault of the modern reproduction/printing technology: It's likely because they've chosen a weakly printed original to reproduce.
R. Grant Jones Agreed, Cambridge makes some of the best prints. This reminds me of the wide margin Clerandon, I know they have better prints of that text because my 7c is really nice. I've become a fan of the little Clerandon my self and the new Cambridge Turquoise, its disappointing they didn't release a black text edition😒 What is so difficult by just printing black text, I'm sure its not a money issue? I actually feel bad now when this happens because I know brothers and sisters like yourself are losing out.
I think there has to be an additional cost from making two different print runs. A publisher also has to print boxes that say "black letter" instead of "red letter" -- and sort the Bibles so they don't go into the wrong boxes. Sellers like evangelicalbible.com have to make up two web pages instead of one. But it is difficult to see how the cost of a black letter edition would be much more than the cost of carrying both goatskin and calf split. Is it possible that black letter Bibles get returned more often -- by people who thought they were buying a red letter edition? That would drive costs up. It's also possible that black letter sales are slower, which leaves stock on the shelves and stock rooms. The publishers could reason, "If we'd printed those in red letters, they'd have sold by now. And the merchants would have room to stock our newer Bibles." So it could be a turnover issue.
Too bad Bible Buying Guide didn't get a chance to ask that question of Cambridge in one of his interviews of industry reps: "So, just what does Cambridge have against black letter Bibles anyway? Will you ever print another black letter Cameo, Concord, or Turquoise?"
R. Grant Jones LOL.maybe Randy should ask us about what we would like to hear😁
That just opened my eyes brother, I didn't consider all the extra cost involved with making another text.
As usual, another amazing review! No one reviews like R. Grant Jones 👍 Quick question for you sir....I understand that the layout between the Concord and the Cameo are obviously different, however, my question is...are the actual cross references and footnotes different too? I’m looking to do Bible study with my family. I want us to all be reading from the same text and able to review the same cross references and footnotes....this is the reason why.
Some family members like the Concord, some the Cameo... of course, lol. Thank you again...
Thanks for those kind words, Adam. I have both the Cameo and Concord in front of me -- and if I had to vote, I think I'd chose the Cameo, even though I have old eyes. I prefer the in-verse superscripts for references, and the typeface, even though the font is too small and the lines are spaced too closely. But they're both excellent. As to your question, the translation notes seem to be the same. For instance, at John 1.12, both provide "Or, the right, or, privilege" as alternates to the word "power" in the text. As best I can tell, the references are also the same. Looking at John 1.4, the Concord cites ch. 11.25, 1 Jn 5.11, and Ch. 8.12. The Cameo cites ch. 11.25 and 1 Jn 5.11 at superscript j, and ch. 8.12 at superscript k. I spot-checked Acts 6.1 also, and the references are the same there also -- but easier to sort out in the Cameo, in my opinion, because in the Concord they break across lines. For instance, a reference to 5.14 in the Concord can have the "5." on one line and the "14" on the next.
Gotcha! I agree with you actually. I find the Cameo more of a 'traditional' expression...more my style. One more question if you don't mind...the Turquoise? This is another option I'm looking at after I watched your video. Are they the same f/n and c/r with the Turquoise as the Cameo by chance? Thank you again sir.
Yes, as far as I can tell. The Turquoise is like a large-font edition of the Cameo, but with better line spacing. The Cameo, on the other hand, is more portable.
Without goatskin the calfsplit will lay flatter and have bigger gutter.
The Calfskin lays flat in Genesis, I was wondering if you could review your Westminster bible. great review thanks
I thought the calfskin would. I think that with time this one will relax, but I don't want to bully it. I'll try to review the TBS Westminster in the next couple of months. Hopefully, it will be a bit shorter than this review!
I like your long reviews you don't miss anything on the bibles.
gypsy lane Agreed, I love it!
If it weren’t for the uneven print quality it would be my favorite version. Maybe YOU know all the words in the KJV that have changed meaning over the years but a lot of people don’t. You picked cousin as an example but how about let, letteth, replenish, suffer, prevent, etc? The glossary is a great resource.
Thanks for the comment, Tikka Fan! You're right, of course.
In KJV Cambridge has best print.
Did you use a scalpel to put in the ‘nicks’ on your font-size template?
No. I used a small pair of scissors.
Exellent
Concord and Cameo, which one do you prefer?
I prefer the Cameo.
@@RGrantJones Thanks. Of Cambridge Cameo and Cambridge Large Print (which uses enlarged Cameo text), which one do you prefer?
@@RGrantJones How about comparing Cameo with Turquoise? Which one do you prefer?
@@ymshao - That's a good idea, but I don't own a Turquoise. I can't justify spending that much money on a red letter Bible. I do own a Church Bible Publishers Turquoise reproduction, and, based on that, I think I would prefer the Turquose over the Cameo.
Bro what's best, goatskin or calfskin? Please respond. Thank you.
First, let me say I'm not an animal hide kind of person. I'm more focused on print, paper and layout. That said, goatskin is tougher, so if you're rough on your Bibles, it's what I recommend. For myself, however, if I have a choice between a calfskin and a goatskin binding for a Bible, and both bindings are edge-lined, I'll generally pick the calfskin. I'm very gentle and careful with my Bibles, so I don't need the toughness of goatskin, and I prefer the feel of calfskin. But it's easier to find an edge-lined Bible in goatskin these days. There aren't as many edge-lined calfskins out there.
R. Grant Jones thanks for your reply brother
Goat skin is softer and usually thinner.
Very desirable stuff , handbags , boots .
I really like my cambridge. But the inking is inconsistent. There is some pages where it loses the boldness. And even quite a few spots where the letters are quite messed up. For the price, they should be able to do better I would think.
Whats outside, is not as important as whats inside. The Scripture is the star of the show, not the binding. But sadly, they have kind of become complacent on that. Mine even has words that run on. And for a book that costs 250 dollars roundabout. I find that pretty unacceptable.
Beautiful Bible but Expensive
True. Thanks for commenting!
What would you prefer west minister or concord?
I like a dark, bold font like the one in the Concord, but overall I prefer the Westminster because of the layout and references.
Well I guess I’ll just have to get both thank you
I suppose turning Black Phillip into a Bible is the ultimate revenge! Ha!
I can't believe Cambridge has the audacity to charge that much money when that print' is so ununiform I got a $20 Holman and it's flawless could be a little bit more Boulder but it's crisp and has no variations in the text I think you're mainly paying for the cover
I agree. It's an eye-opener to compare the prices of goatskin and hardback editions of the same Bible. For instance, the hardback Cambridge ESV Wide-Margin is $60 at Christian Book Distributors, but they want $265 for the goatskin.
And you're right about the print quality here -- disappointing.
R. Grant Jones thanks for answering back I'm also finding out that Bible stores are closing and then if you do find one there taking a dump on the King James they hardly carry any and the ones that they do carry like Thomas Nelson and stuff they have a lot of man's words in the text that's a No-No they should just have it at the top of the header I'm fine with that anything else is bunk thanks a lot for your review
David Clark, I picked up a new Nelson large print center-column ref KJV, in “comfort print”, bonded leather, for $16. The paper, print uniformity, font, and readability all blow away any of my Cambridge bibles. Sad but true.
I just wish it came in a nice leather cover, but Nelson hasn’t released them yet.
I own this Bible and it imparts a little history and character of it’s own in terms of the facsimile of the letterpress original. Whether you interpret it’s imperfections as interesting, or charming, or annoying comes down to individual opinion. As for myself, I recoil from perfect, modern, digital fonts (particularly for the KJV). So-called ‘Comfort Print’ and Schuyler’s ‘Milo’ fonts leave me cold. They belong in a corporate annual report to shareholders not the Word Of God. I partly agree about hardbacks (and there ought to be more choices) but I am prepared to pay for the hand skills of bookbinders to be kept valid in this world. (Edge lining especially is a difficult and mostly manual skill.)
Dont you think God used kings? And esp in the translation the KJV the only true literal translation.
Fred - yes, God certainly used kings. I grew up using the KJV and I like it, but I'm not KJV only.
R. Grant Jones yes sir. Well i still enjoy your reviews. Very thorough
Other reviews of this and similar Concords:
Airik1111 - ua-cam.com/video/3H9bgAiyizU/v-deo.html
Gypsy Lane - ua-cam.com/video/YCtau7W-1yY/v-deo.html
Bible Believing Christian - ua-cam.com/video/H_9VEMZNZFo/v-deo.html
Living with Faith Bible Reviews - ua-cam.com/video/ECJsejCsla8/v-deo.html
Bible Buying Guide - ua-cam.com/video/ovEZMWCd4Yg/v-deo.html
Derek Yee - ua-cam.com/video/wAeMuZ8Yb3c/v-deo.html
tonywalker23 - ua-cam.com/video/OMYVeRDdys8/v-deo.html
PaulT - ua-cam.com/video/xNzm-Xx_Et8/v-deo.html
Mtbhan96 - ua-cam.com/video/xh1bGGIeK1o/v-deo.html
Bible Study - ua-cam.com/video/UKRs-GlombY/v-deo.html
New Life of Albany Ga - ua-cam.com/video/bMW7zc6nVT0/v-deo.html
thank you
Thanks brother😉
This Bible is available from evangelicalbible.com at evangelicalbible.com/product/cambridge-kjv-concord-reference-black-goatskin-black-letter/
From Christian Book Distributors at www.christianbook.com/kjv-concord-reference-goatskin-leather-black/9780521707961/pd/707961?event=ESRCG
From Amazon: www.amazon.com/Concord-Reference-Edge-Lined-Goatskin-Leather/dp/052170796X
New and used from Abe Books: www.abebooks.com/book-search/isbn/9780521707961/
Very good, thanx!