సైన్స్ - సూడో సైన్స్ - సైంటిఫిక్ థింకింగ్ | Hari Raghav | Square Talks

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 15

  • @janakidarapu3611
    @janakidarapu3611 24 дні тому +1

    Causes, Scientific knowledge , kosamu enta debth ga explain chesaru ragavagaru, meru enta ga study observation chesi unterundi, enta easy ga chepunnaru sir thank u very much sir

  • @venkateswarlub7262
    @venkateswarlub7262 Місяць тому

    Well explained sir

  • @namasivayachikkam671
    @namasivayachikkam671 2 місяці тому

    I feel u can put questions as subtitles on screen. And audio questions will get good effect then these anchors. Pl think

  • @sooreshan007
    @sooreshan007 3 місяці тому +4

    CHALA CHALA MANCHIGA CHEPUTUNNARU SAARU. ❤

  • @ravindrababuthalluru4140
    @ravindrababuthalluru4140 3 місяці тому

    Real Facts meru Matladinaru Sir

  • @bskm5322
    @bskm5322 16 днів тому

    ❤❤🎉🎉

  • @Hanuman-r6s
    @Hanuman-r6s 3 місяці тому +1

    Namaskaram Anna, I have heard emotion is very powerful. In India dating apps etc are becoming big becoz of western influence. This changing of people and friends affect one mental health who is vulnerable.

  • @sumanakasula8721
    @sumanakasula8721 3 місяці тому

    Chala chukkaga explain chesaru sir thank you

  • @NarsimhaVejendla
    @NarsimhaVejendla 3 місяці тому

    ❤❤ excellent 👌 analysis sir.❤❤

  • @Saikirankolli111
    @Saikirankolli111 3 місяці тому

    Excellent explanation raghav sir

  • @Hanuman-r6s
    @Hanuman-r6s 3 місяці тому +1

    Namaskaram Hari Anna,
    Karma book by Sadhguru is the biggest myth breaker I came across. Many psychological issues are coming because of society double standards. I urge people to read to get illogical things explained in logical way.

  • @laxmareddypalle2784
    @laxmareddypalle2784 3 місяці тому +1

    💯

  • @namasivayachikkam671
    @namasivayachikkam671 2 місяці тому

    Siddulu. Analyse pl

  • @teja7976
    @teja7976 3 місяці тому +3

    Devuda. Mundhu aa anchor ni marchandi. Ithanu cheppe dhanini minimum question cheyakunda unte ithanu notiki vachindhi cheppukunta pothaadu.
    1. He can't even define sceience. Common sense ki scientific thinking ki theda telidhu. Scientific method is a very specific thing. Dhaniki hypothesis define cheyadam, prediction cheyadam, aa hypothesis ni falsify cheyadaniki experiment cheyadam. Aa experiment outcome dvara hypothesis ni update cheyadam ane steps untayi (more more details : en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method). Ithanu ichina boddhinka example veetiki nilabadadhu.
    3. Annitikante biggest mistake in this entire video, padhe padhe padhe chesina mistake entante, scientific peer review process gurinchi matladakapovadam. Scientistlu devullu kaadhu, valla "authority" ni accept cheyakarledhu ani antaadu. Science lo evaru authority ni base cheskoni statements cheyaru. Nuvu Nobel prize winner ayina, nuvu chesina work ni "peer review" ane process lo pettalsindhe. Andulo nuvu chesina work ni, nee use chesina methodology ni reveal cheyyali. Aa methodology ni dhaaniki thagina knowledge unna vallu review chestaaru. Nee results ni vere evaraina tirigi reproduce cheyagalara ani check chesthaaru. Avanni clear ayyakane nee work ni science ga accept chestaaru. Idhi common man ki, mukhyamga mana society lo, antha telidhu. Dheeni gurinchi cheppakunda, authority authority ani cheppina sodhe malli malli cheppaadu. Public ni educate chese oka manchi chance miss cheskunnaadu.
    Overall ga ee video is substandard. Poor rationalisations ni science ani explain thosukutu vachaadu. Science anna word teesesi unte bagundedhi. Common sense ani anunte saripothundhi.