When Randall Carlson and graham Hancock talked about this years ago....most scientists said they were wrong and always asked for the impact and finally they got! Now they are acknowledging it
This is not proof. It is evidence, and I can't understand why anyone would think so given the uncertainty about the date of the impact. Please go read the paper.
@@Costa_Conn Given their comments about ice above the ~12k mark being undisturbed I would say their fear of snubbed by pear review outweighed their willingness to emphasize this evidence of a much closer range. Its like they point it out out and then take 100 steps back and disassociated themselves from the facts just so they wouldn't get sucked into the vortex of haters.
Randaall did bring this up back in 2006. Some 12 years ago now and at the time said it was a great contender for being a cause of global problems - ua-cam.com/video/YrYsNB-k5kM/v-deo.html Take note when the talk actually took place. I think it is in the latest GeoCosmicRex video that he states what he believes would have been he likely consequence to this hit alone. Not forgetting that this may not have been the whole thing which came down from the skies at that time.
Gytis Pranskunas I'm not denying anything graham or Randall said but I just wonder how the America's were the places most devastated if it struck in Greenland? I would think more towards Europe and Africa being the 2 continents most heavily wiped out. But then again I'm just a curious idiot and know nothing about the subject other than what I heard on the podcast so 🤷🏻♂️
@Ooki Cooki He never claimed any ancient civilization had "modern technology". That's a quick throw in skeptics use to try and sound educated and edgy. Edgycated
@Ooki Cooki Also, on the ancient civilizations point. Graham is already winning on that front, with Gobleki Tepe and other new areas being found and dug up right now. He says ancient civilization is much older than we think and that they were more advanced at one point and then had to rebuild after a disaster. Not that they were futuristic and advanced beyond or so much as are today. Some of the most sophisticated and advanced archaelogical ancient work comes from 5000-11000 B.C . Atleast whats been found and examined today. I don't necessarily believe Graham Hancocks theories but he also hasn't been disproven by any stretch, actually the opposite at this point. It's just fun to think about from time to time.
That's most likely theory, that mainstream archaeology tries to bury because it means Humanity had civilization way before what history books and mainstream archaeological community taught for decades ... Plus it contradicts to certain political agendas, one in particularly being human evoked global warming (which is real but not as important but we face way bigger danger through natural causes, that prominent political agenda chooses to completely and utterly ignore)
Yep also explains half melted statues and fused rock in a ancient fort in Scotland. This event also killed off all large mammals such as sabertooth tiger and woolly mammoths. Human kind experienced a massive event which almost finished us 12600 years ago!
With the utmost due respect for Randall and the work he does- he has never pinpointed this crater or any particular crater in this area. This video is simply presenting unbiased facts as they stand at this particular point in time- it is not claiming that anyone was right or wrong. Yes, this discovery MAY vindicate the research of People like Randall, and the Comet Research Group, BUT only irrefutable evidence of the timing of this impact will say whether there is any correlation with the YDI- as stated; it may be millions of years old... The only thing it does point to is that this planet has been struck many times in the past, and this is something that Randall et al hold dear to. Stick to the facts as they stand- jumping to (possibly erroneous) conclusions is what has gotten us to the status quo in modern academia- the mess that the independent researchers now have to work very hard to undo.
check out the link between the richat structure in mauritania and atlantis. The evidence is pretty conclusive imo. There's a great video discussing the link over on Bright Insight's channel.
Atlantis is in the northwestern Sahara. A huge complex of concentric rings you can see on Google Earth. Beyond the straits of Gibraltar and situated exactly as the ancients described.
@@mnomadvfx That's not the point. They freely admit they did NOT create the hypothesis. They ARE the most vocal proponents of it and have done the most to raise awareness to the general public and have received the most criticism and personal attacks because of it
@@alexanderren1097 Not just raise awareness either, they have done a TON of great science (especially Randall) to support this. People like this nomad fella obviously are bias and no need to waste your time trying convince someone who refuses to look at the evidence objectively!
This is a fascinating discovery. Another thing is Gobekli Tepe has stone megaliths believed to be 10,000 BC depicting a comet hitting the Earth. Kind of corroborates the story that around 12,000 BC something occured that changed the climate and caused disasters.
And the human culture at that time KNEW the impacts were coming... Star gazers that saw the trouble and built their cities out of 50 ton stone blocks accordingly... Pre- Inca construction thousands of years older than Inca society. ua-cam.com/video/VbaoL77EHTA/v-deo.html
@@mnomadvfx If it hit the 3km laurentide ice sheet, and raised the world's ocean levels by 120m, then the effects of the impact would have been felt globally, which would explain the sudden loss of 300 species of megafauna.
The Comet Research Group are onto this. Randall Carlson and Graham Hancock get the last laugh after being ridiculed by closed minded morons for so long. Now, even Marc Defant has come out in favour of the YD impact hypothesis after reading the evidence for himself in the excellent book Deadly Voyager. Well done Randall and Graham for sticking to your guns and seeking the truth.
More like a climatological disaster. Human civilizations at that time would have been shattered, and ice cores record indeed such a climate devastating event occurred. Further, I contend that the shockwaves of this event, both literally and figuratively, were remembered by cultures around the world, entwined with our legends, and are remembered to this day in the long-standing historical perspectives of each culture's religion.
@@supaF Not really - there is more than enough evidence of materials that could only be produced by an impact at the boundary layer - it is still entirely possible that the crater or craters are elsewhere.
@@joegastly6166 I haven't heard anything definitive about that so far. I'm sure I'll hear pretty quickly from Martin Sweatman if and when that happens.
Might help account for one of the two great meltings. I wonder if this would have been enough to raise the Earth's water levels by 60 meters some 12k years ago?
@@unvergebeneid True, but there used to be a lot more ice around Canada, I wonder if it affected that too, maybe through increased geothermal activity from the initial impact.
@@TheBruceKeller Another hypothesis is that an impact the size of this one would only melt enough ice to introduce a large mass of fresh water into the Atlantic which would in turn slow or stop the North Atlantic Sea Currents, dropping global temperatures. This could account for he first major drop in temperature recorded in the beginning of the Younger Dryas. The rapid warming and sea level rise which was recorded at the end of the Younger Dryas could be caused by a similar event or even a solar flare from our sun which would cause a much larger energy input into the Earth's system which would melt all the ice recently created from the mini ice age caused by this impact crater, and also melt a much larger area then this fairly localized event when it comes to melting of ice.
Probable, The fireball would have done damage but the crater would have been molten for some time acting as a furnace in the northern hemisphere, although global cooling would eventually follow an impact, it wouldn't take the sea level back down buy much if at all. Switching track ever so slightly, don't you think it's odd that the climate has been it's most stable since the impact, before the climate was up then down, but after the impact we get 8000 years of relatively stable climate.....literally out of the blue. (check any climate graph for the last half a million years and you'll see this is the case!!)
Give justice and credit to the people that already suggested and proved this years back! Especially the comet research group, they invested their own money to get to the truth because they couldn't get funded because of ignorant mainstream thinking
Leapfrogger219 not to mention almost every modern or known civilization has a story of a Great Flood. Noah’s Ark, the sinking of Atlantis, and many more.
"Evidence for such a flood remains inconclusive" So you're saying that every single ancient culture to ever spring out of this catastrophe is a liar? If I have ever heard of a "bold accusation" , this one takes the fucking cake.
If this impact had occurred around 12000years before as evidence suggests, it would explain the sudden extinction of woolly mammoth, saber tooth tigers and numerous other large species. Perhaps this impact triggered a massive tsunami that annihilated an advanced civilization, the survivors scattered throughout the world. The seeds of new civilization.
Watching this for the second time. It is now May 2020. Seven months have gone by. One glaring mistake. Objects within 1000 km would have been leveled by the impact. Probably more..... There exists all kinds of evidence that mega fauna like vast herds of Mastodon and Mammoth, Pleistocene bison, all travel ling in large herds across northern latitudes, were swept away, large bones broken, and swept into deep valleys and ravines, to later be covered in layers of mud, covered with organic muck, trees, small animals, and later, the tsunamis that roared back and forth across continental shelves, added the last layers forming sedimentary loess that we see today.
Very hard to believe that this would have happened 12,000 years ago, and be the cause of the Younger Dryas. Such an asteroid hitting Greenland would have generated an enormous amount of heat, intense enough to melt much of the ice in Greenland. Such an event, and so close to the areas where the ice cores have been drilled, would have left an enormous sediment mark on the cores, and in fact, maybe even make the ice record in Greenland top out at 12,000 yrs, but we all know it goes much further back in time than that. If much of the ice had melted, we would have ice at the bottom (past 12,000 years) , but unreadable ice, no longer separated by winter/summer yearly differentiations. I still think that it is very possible that the Younger Dryas may have been caused by a meteor strike, just not the one that created this crater.
"intense enough to melt much of the ice in Greenland" They did not claim as such in the video - Greenland is huge and if most of it was covered in ice then only a small amount of it would have been melted.
The craters seem to all have a circular profile, which points to a perpendicular strike angle. Surely some cosmic impacts would have been grazing hits? The Carolina Bays are blamed on glacial ice bombs, with a 35 degree impact angle, generated by a Michigan impact on the ice sheet.
Its been confirmed now that it was indeed 12,800 years ago. And now it makes so much sense why the previous ice age ended so much earlier than the previous major ice ages. Usually they go on for hundreds and millions of years instead of just 2 million, not to mention how long it takes once they start to end naturally, when the previous one came to a pretty much immediate end within just hundreds of years. That impact ended the ice age just like the Vredefort did to the original ice age 2 billion years ago. So damn cool. But of course just like the Chicxulub, most people are taking it as a joke. But as the proof adds and spreads around the world in a decade or 2, it's gonna be just as famous as the one that ended the dino's. I mean it's plain and simple right in front of us, we were hit again. just very very recently. I just don't understand why people find it so hard to believe. Maybe we're still just stuck in an era where alot of people believe that we're forever protected by a merciful god. We can thank Jesus for that too. Lol
The various impacts have not ended the Quaternary ice age; we are still in it. 2.6 million years and counting. It does highlight that natural events overshadow human carbon emission issues many times over. It would be good to know what type of major impact we should expect next, where and when.
"And now it makes so much sense why the previous ice age ended so much earlier than the previous major ice ages." The Younger Dryas was not named for an impact event but a period of 1000 year long cooling - if anything what it was that caused the YD era delayed the end of the last ice age considerably.
"News reports about the discovery include speculation that it could be as young as 12,000 years; these assertions are based on the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis. Fragments of charcoal up to about 2 cm (0.79 in) in size that were recovered directly from the ice at the tip of the Hiawatha Glacier, where the glacial outwash containing sand interpreted to be either impact melt or shocked metamorphite was collected, yielded an age greater than 43,500 BP. This result was interpreted as an effect of "thermal degradation"; the true age is estimated to be 3-2.4 Ma." That's anywhere from 2.4 to 3 million years old, not a confirmation at all.
@@mnomadvfx Dude, I know that. I round my words like rounding numbers to the highest decibel if that makes sense, Ice age as in glaciation period. My point is I believe we could’ve still been more in the glacial period if not for the younger dryas cataclysm. Or maybe not, I’m not gonna throw a fit if not lmao. Yes I know it’s still pending, it’s definitely not been confirmed to be 2mya idk why you’re claiming that, that’s just as off as saying 12,800. BUT, dude come on, there was definitely an impact(s) back then. Shocked quartz a wide swap of the planet, fields of hundreds of dead mammoths with broken legs all dating to the same time, ground zero’s of great floods dating back around that exact time like the scablands (also to point out, it’s been confirmed that they weren’t formed over time but within a violent few days) yeah. And no maybe Hiawatha has nothing to do with it. But there was definitely an impact cataclysm as much as chixculub 66mya, just not near as bad. The potential mid disaster rate from Hiawatha’s size does puzzle in with the mid mass extinction of the younger dryas though. So until it’s fully confirmed I’m gonna keep puzzling Hiawatha with 12,800ya, but I more believe that there was probably multiple.
It brought the Clovis culture and the megafauna to an abrupt end. Out with the Clovis people, and in with the Folsom culture. Just imagine what the world would be like had the Younger Dryas not happened. We still might have megafauna roaming north America today.
Dynastic Egyptians couldn't have built Giza Plateau, Pyramids, and definitely not the Sphinx. They inherited it just like the Aztecs found Teotihuacan, The Inca found Machu Pichu. Stone Henge, Angor Wat, and many other Megalithic structures weren't built by hunter-gatherers with bronze tools. They were the cataclysmic survivors. When a comet strikes and takes out most of humanity, we will go back to those hunter-gatherers and start all over. The evidence from different fields of science is now overwhelming and finally being accepted just like the comet/meteor that took out the Dinosaurs. 'Atlantis' like resets have happened on this planet a lot more than we've been told. Right now WE are Atlantis.
Surly, such a large impact would have left a layer of all the usual debris of meteorite impacts in the ice cores and indeed there are indications of a meteorite hit about that time. But the signature in the ice cores is weak and tenuous. A hit of that magnitude and in such close proximity to the rest of the Greenland Ice Sheet should have left a whopper of a signature. No such signature has been observed.
@@blackpearl6972 - dear Black pearl, brilliant assumption.. I'm working on a thesis involving nuclear blast theories creating these craters and extinction level events. Can you elaborate and or give some reference sources.. thank u.
It would make sense if it was 12,000 years ago. It would explain those great floods when the glaciers in the north melted. The mass die off of life in North America. So much land was reclaimed by the oceans when those glaciers melted rapidly. So many lost civilisations as throughout history humans settled by coastlines and rivers. These great events were passed down over hundred of generations of people through stories which became altered every generation. We have heard of these tales such as Noah’s ark etc.
When people talk of this I find it mmm narrow they should add all the other things that took place at the same millennium, Carolina bays ,the loss of flora and fauna, the evidence around north and south America's and Australia, or southern hemisphere. Planet took a shit kicking,glad that we finally getting a grip on our history.
That time period also coincides with mass melting of north America's ice-sheet and dumping of the Ice-lake, that must of destroyed the whole north America's eco system. ( Simply washed away by giant tidal wave over land by Ice water ) Check out the Geologists research of Randall Carlson
So I have a question for the geniuses out there,so a super eruption occurs blowing out mountains with huge chunks of rock thrown up into the stratosphere then they fall back to earth would this cause craters or not?would this not cause some of these and what if they got stuck up there like a satellite?
The amount of energy coming from a 1.5 km comet from space would make a large rock dropping from a volcanic explosion seem like a small pebble in comparison. It's not even close. The largest rocks ejected from Mount Sanit Helen's were the size of a big house.
2:07 An asteroid impact of that magnitude would cause massive tidal waves that would cover much of North America, not just flow into the world's oceans.
The USGS has a website with topographical maps. Take a look around the US sometime. The entire country is scarred with the evidence of an unbelievably massive flood. Take a look around Wisconsin and Minnesota. Those river valleys weren't formed by the rivers that currently run through them, and it didn't take millions of years to cut those large channels out. We know that there were 2 massive influxes of water going into the ocean at the end of the ice age. Since there's no natural source of heat on earth capable of melting glaciers fast enough to rapidly fill the oceans, the only other option is something from space hitting the earth, or the sun doing something. The sun doesn't leave impact proxies...impacts do. Since impact proxies are found all over the northern hemisphere at the Younger Dryas Boundary, it's pretty obvious something(s) smashed into earth and caused the glaciers to rapidly melt, resulting in extinctions and global destruction.
The smoking gun has always been the abrupt disappearance of the apex animals in North America and Siberia. Human predation in this one region and no where else on Earth... Yeah, no. Native peoples do not hunt animals to extinction. Modern Western man does that.
Considering Dr. Velikovsky predicted this. I believe you should give him credit and cite his work. Chalk this up as another conspiracy theory that turned out to be true.
this could overturn the official record, an amazing discovery. lets see what the carbon dating gives us but if its from 12k years ago, this could be the reason and the skeptics were right.
This is not really a carbon datable thing. That is a measurement of an isotope of carbon found in living things. It's has a predictable half life as it decays and is reliable to an extent. There is likely no surviving organic material to date at this site. It would have been destroyed. There must be another dating technique but beyond ice core data I don't know what that could be.
First if all, well done Carlson and Hancock, but what about this: Atlantis was actually capital of Anunaki warriors, leded by God (but actually the leader of those warrior aliens called yud-heh-waw-heh or Jahve), Ezekiel was the that was saying he met him personally, where divided fractions of Anunaki aliens made the whole stkry about humans. Anyway, the real problem is the age of the story.. Now, something happened with Atlantis but its not 2,5 thousand years ago (Ezekiel), or ancient Egypt around 300 years BC, or many more informations from that part of history, maybe the age is actually connected to this crater discovered in Grenland where Atlantis was situated, and got destroyed by weapon, not asteroid. Weapon which came from Anunaki fraction, which was in war with Jahve's army. Who are they, and where they comming from, its infront of our future to know, but this is how we (slaves of Anunakies) started life in this planet. And nk, im not drinking or using drugs, jist thinking loudly..
As I hear more and more about solar micronova and electrical discharge, I wonder how we will ultimately tell the difference between impact and electrical discharge cratering?
please update your video time is wrong should be 2 millions years old and climate altering impact was at 12,900 years ago with very numerous comet impact across the world and in America in particular
Noahs ark isnt the only story of some heros that know the flood is coming before it hapoens. There's dozens and dozens of different stories of all different tongues that tell similar stories of floods taking place at the same time period. Which is very fascinating.
No. But it may confirm that most flood myths from around the world were based on this catastrophic event. No god, no chosen one, just a natural global cataclysm.
Jamie, pull up slide 167
Joe rogan? Lol
@Nick B speak English bro
-Randall “finger lakes” Carlson
Joe "nuclear glass" Rogan
Joe "Who still has a calculator?" Rogan.
When Randall Carlson and graham Hancock talked about this years ago....most scientists said they were wrong and always asked for the impact and finally they got! Now they are acknowledging it
love this response . I just dived into Grahams stuff in September and ive been hooked ever since
This is not proof. It is evidence, and I can't understand why anyone would think so given the uncertainty about the date of the impact. Please go read the paper.
This is not an "impact" crater.
This channel is fake science.
@@Costa_Conn Given their comments about ice above the ~12k mark being undisturbed I would say their fear of snubbed by pear review outweighed their willingness to emphasize this evidence of a much closer range. Its like they point it out out and then take 100 steps back and disassociated themselves from the facts just so they wouldn't get sucked into the vortex of haters.
Randaall did bring this up back in 2006. Some 12 years ago now and at the time said it was a great contender for being a cause of global problems - ua-cam.com/video/YrYsNB-k5kM/v-deo.html Take note when the talk actually took place. I think it is in the latest GeoCosmicRex video that he states what he believes would have been he likely consequence to this hit alone. Not forgetting that this may not have been the whole thing which came down from the skies at that time.
Vindication for Hancock and Carlson and all truth seekers!
Bright insight too
I think you'll find the credit needs to go to Firestone et al....... Hancock and Carlson are just plagiarising their work. In the good sense.
Does anyone know if they figured out a more accurate time of when this hit?
@@lazenbytim - Eh, no. I think you’ll find Carlson and Hancock have been suggesting this for decades independently.
@@lazenbytim They’ve both given full credit and citations to Firestone .
Graham Hancock has the last laugh
And Randell Carlson
It's Mind-blown how things unfold. Proving Graham and other researched was indeed true.
Gytis Pranskunas I'm not denying anything graham or Randall said but I just wonder how the America's were the places most devastated if it struck in Greenland? I would think more towards Europe and Africa being the 2 continents most heavily wiped out. But then again I'm just a curious idiot and know nothing about the subject other than what I heard on the podcast so 🤷🏻♂️
@Ooki Cooki He never claimed any ancient civilization had "modern technology".
That's a quick throw in skeptics use to try and sound educated and edgy.
Edgycated
@Ooki Cooki Also, on the ancient civilizations point. Graham is already winning on that front, with Gobleki Tepe and other new areas being found and dug up right now.
He says ancient civilization is much older than we think and that they were more advanced at one point and then had to rebuild after a disaster. Not that they were futuristic and advanced beyond or so much as are today.
Some of the most sophisticated and advanced archaelogical ancient work comes from 5000-11000 B.C . Atleast whats been found and examined today.
I don't necessarily believe Graham Hancocks theories but he also hasn't been disproven by any stretch, actually the opposite at this point.
It's just fun to think about from time to time.
this could be the event ancient people called great flood
77leny
That’s exactly what it is! The information is all around us!
That's most likely theory, that mainstream archaeology tries to bury because it means Humanity had civilization way before what history books and mainstream archaeological community taught for decades ... Plus it contradicts to certain political agendas, one in particularly being human evoked global warming (which is real but not as important but we face way bigger danger through natural causes, that prominent political agenda chooses to completely and utterly ignore)
Jay Morgan but none like this asteroid would’ve caused.
Yep also explains half melted statues and fused rock in a ancient fort in Scotland. This event also killed off all large mammals such as sabertooth tiger and woolly mammoths. Human kind experienced a massive event which almost finished us 12600 years ago!
It is. That’s what happened to Atlantis. Located left of Africa in the eye of Sahara and also there’s craters in under the sand of Egypt.
Randall Carlson!
More people need to hear him talk
So... Not ONE word about Randall Carlson????
2006, brought it up in one of his "friendly meetings".
He was right! He's very intelligent
DISAPPOINTING
With the utmost due respect for Randall and the work he does- he has never pinpointed this crater or any particular crater in this area. This video is simply presenting unbiased facts as they stand at this particular point in time- it is not claiming that anyone was right or wrong. Yes, this discovery MAY vindicate the research of People like Randall, and the Comet Research Group, BUT only irrefutable evidence of the timing of this impact will say whether there is any correlation with the YDI- as stated; it may be millions of years old... The only thing it does point to is that this planet has been struck many times in the past, and this is something that Randall et al hold dear to. Stick to the facts as they stand- jumping to (possibly erroneous) conclusions is what has gotten us to the status quo in modern academia- the mess that the independent researchers now have to work very hard to undo.
He's a threat because he's not on that groupthink nonsense
I Dislked because you are selfish reporters. Mention RANDALL CARLSON and GEORGE HOWARD.
Well, at this pace Atlantis might have very well been much realer than we thought.
check out the link between the richat structure in mauritania and atlantis. The evidence is pretty conclusive imo. There's a great video discussing the link over on Bright Insight's channel.
In general, the flood myths from around the world. Most likely an ancient story of this catastrophic event.
Frost p0 the fi
It was and is in the Eye of the Sahara/Africa. Look up bright insight.
Atlantis is in the northwestern Sahara. A huge complex of concentric rings you can see on Google Earth. Beyond the straits of Gibraltar and situated exactly as the ancients described.
Randall Carlson and Graham Hancock, you guys are awesome 👏
Why?
Did they create the Younger Dryas hypothesis?
No?
I thought not.
@@mnomadvfx That's not the point. They freely admit they did NOT create the hypothesis. They ARE the most vocal proponents of it and have done the most to raise awareness to the general public and have received the most criticism and personal attacks because of it
@@alexanderren1097 Not just raise awareness either, they have done a TON of great science (especially Randall) to support this. People like this nomad fella obviously are bias and no need to waste your time trying convince someone who refuses to look at the evidence objectively!
This is a fascinating discovery. Another thing is Gobekli Tepe has stone megaliths believed to be 10,000 BC depicting a comet hitting the Earth. Kind of corroborates the story that around 12,000 BC something occured that changed the climate and caused disasters.
And the human culture at that time KNEW the impacts were coming... Star gazers that saw the trouble and built their cities out of 50 ton stone blocks accordingly... Pre- Inca construction thousands of years older than Inca society. ua-cam.com/video/VbaoL77EHTA/v-deo.html
Turkey is a long way from Greenland.
While the impact would have been felt and heard that far way the actual descent might well have been missed.
@@mnomadvfx legends and fables travel through time.
I'm 1000% sure this Is the Noah and great flood story echoing through
@@mnomadvfx If it hit the 3km laurentide ice sheet, and raised the world's ocean levels by 120m, then the effects of the impact would have been felt globally, which would explain the sudden loss of 300 species of megafauna.
Graham and Randall are somewhere chuckling,
Joe Rogan brought me here
same
The Comet Research Group are onto this. Randall Carlson and Graham Hancock get the last laugh after being ridiculed by closed minded morons for so long. Now, even Marc Defant has come out in favour of the YD impact hypothesis after reading the evidence for himself in the excellent book Deadly Voyager. Well done Randall and Graham for sticking to your guns and seeking the truth.
More like a climatological disaster. Human civilizations at that time would have been shattered, and ice cores record indeed such a climate devastating event occurred. Further, I contend that the shockwaves of this event, both literally and figuratively, were remembered by cultures around the world, entwined with our legends, and are remembered to this day in the long-standing historical perspectives of each culture's religion.
the younger dryas impact possibly?
Not possibly, the younger dryas theory relies on this.
@@supaF Not really - there is more than enough evidence of materials that could only be produced by an impact at the boundary layer - it is still entirely possible that the crater or craters are elsewhere.
@@keithprice475 that's a good point! Thanks for the knowledge
@@keithprice475 Do you know if they figured out a more accurate time of when this hit?
@@joegastly6166 I haven't heard anything definitive about that so far. I'm sure I'll hear pretty quickly from Martin Sweatman if and when that happens.
40 days and 40 nights - of rain, from vaporized ice sheets.
It would just be ice melt mostly, not rain.
Might help account for one of the two great meltings. I wonder if this would have been enough to raise the Earth's water levels by 60 meters some 12k years ago?
No, if the entire Greenland ice sheet melted, it would raise the sea level by "only" 7.2m.
@@unvergebeneid True, but there used to be a lot more ice around Canada, I wonder if it affected that too, maybe through increased geothermal activity from the initial impact.
@@TheBruceKeller Another hypothesis is that an impact the size of this one would only melt enough ice to introduce a large mass of fresh water into the Atlantic which would in turn slow or stop the North Atlantic Sea Currents, dropping global temperatures. This could account for he first major drop in temperature recorded in the beginning of the Younger Dryas. The rapid warming and sea level rise which was recorded at the end of the Younger Dryas could be caused by a similar event or even a solar flare from our sun which would cause a much larger energy input into the Earth's system which would melt all the ice recently created from the mini ice age caused by this impact crater, and also melt a much larger area then this fairly localized event when it comes to melting of ice.
Nothing to say that this is the only thing that impacted the earth that day this one came down. This could merely be a fragment of the original item.
Probable, The fireball would have done damage but the crater would have been molten for some time acting as a furnace in the northern hemisphere, although global cooling would eventually follow an impact, it wouldn't take the sea level back down buy much if at all. Switching track ever so slightly, don't you think it's odd that the climate has been it's most stable since the impact, before the climate was up then down, but after the impact we get 8000 years of relatively stable climate.....literally out of the blue. (check any climate graph for the last half a million years and you'll see this is the case!!)
Be sure to thank Randall Carlson and Graham Hancock for finding out what happened to the world 12,000 years ago
Give justice and credit to the people that already suggested and proved this years back! Especially the comet research group, they invested their own money to get to the truth because they couldn't get funded because of ignorant mainstream thinking
Video: "Evidence for such a flood remains inconclusive"
Randall Carlson: "...so these charts here"
Leapfrogger219 not to mention almost every modern or known civilization has a story of a Great Flood. Noah’s Ark, the sinking of Atlantis, and many more.
The impact needs to be dated, however, I do believe it is the smoking gun for Younger Dryas
*a smoking gun
Evidence is mounting the Younger Dryas was triggered by multiple impacts and possibly Tanguska type airbursts as well
Hancock and Carlson should be acknowledged by the mainstream
"Evidence for such a flood remains inconclusive"
So you're saying that every single ancient culture to ever spring out of this catastrophe is a liar? If I have ever heard of a "bold accusation" , this one takes the fucking cake.
If this impact had occurred around 12000years before as evidence suggests, it would explain the sudden extinction of woolly mammoth, saber tooth tigers and numerous other large species. Perhaps this impact triggered a massive tsunami that annihilated an advanced civilization, the survivors scattered throughout the world. The seeds of new civilization.
Yep. That's the reason why America lost so many megafauna compared to other places like Africa that didn't get any impact event.
It occurred when the, Arctic was tropical
Watching this for the second time. It is now May 2020. Seven months have gone by. One glaring mistake. Objects within 1000 km would have been leveled by the impact. Probably more.....
There exists all kinds of evidence that mega fauna like vast herds of Mastodon and Mammoth, Pleistocene bison, all travel ling in large herds across northern latitudes, were swept away, large bones broken, and swept into deep valleys and ravines, to later be covered in layers of mud, covered with organic muck, trees, small animals, and later, the tsunamis that roared back and forth across continental shelves, added the last layers forming sedimentary loess that we see today.
Very hard to believe that this would have happened 12,000 years ago, and be the cause of the Younger Dryas. Such an asteroid hitting Greenland would have generated an enormous amount of heat, intense enough to melt much of the ice in Greenland. Such an event, and so close to the areas where the ice cores have been drilled, would have left an enormous sediment mark on the cores, and in fact, maybe even make the ice record in Greenland top out at 12,000 yrs, but we all know it goes much further back in time than that. If much of the ice had melted, we would have ice at the bottom (past 12,000 years) , but unreadable ice, no longer separated by winter/summer yearly differentiations.
I still think that it is very possible that the Younger Dryas may have been caused by a meteor strike, just not the one that created this crater.
"intense enough to melt much of the ice in Greenland"
They did not claim as such in the video - Greenland is huge and if most of it was covered in ice then only a small amount of it would have been melted.
Randall Carlson wasnt shocked
The City that was in the center of the Hiawatha crater must have been amazing ! :-)
Evidence for this (flood) remains inconclusive? Randal Carlson would beg to differ!
The craters seem to all have a circular profile, which points to a perpendicular strike angle. Surely some cosmic impacts would have been grazing hits? The Carolina Bays are blamed on glacial ice bombs, with a 35 degree impact angle, generated by a Michigan impact on the ice sheet.
Hello from the future 👋🏼 turns out this crater is 58 million years old
Now they found a second not far from the first
What's the second one called?
Thanks for not adding Political Spin to the video..!
Randal Carlson is laughing hard now......
humans didnt kill off those giant sabertooths that weighed twice as much as lions, this did
Give Graham and Darell the respect they deserve!
That would be no respect
Why is nobody's talking about this, that could change the perception of how the human kind civilization began
Its been confirmed now that it was indeed 12,800 years ago. And now it makes so much sense why the previous ice age ended so much earlier than the previous major ice ages. Usually they go on for hundreds and millions of years instead of just 2 million, not to mention how long it takes once they start to end naturally, when the previous one came to a pretty much immediate end within just hundreds of years. That impact ended the ice age just like the Vredefort did to the original ice age 2 billion years ago. So damn cool. But of course just like the Chicxulub, most people are taking it as a joke. But as the proof adds and spreads around the world in a decade or 2, it's gonna be just as famous as the one that ended the dino's. I mean it's plain and simple right in front of us, we were hit again. just very very recently. I just don't understand why people find it so hard to believe. Maybe we're still just stuck in an era where alot of people believe that we're forever protected by a merciful god. We can thank Jesus for that too. Lol
The various impacts have not ended the Quaternary ice age; we are still in it.
2.6 million years and counting.
It does highlight that natural events overshadow human carbon emission issues many times over. It would be good to know what type of major impact we should expect next, where and when.
"And now it makes so much sense why the previous ice age ended so much earlier than the previous major ice ages."
The Younger Dryas was not named for an impact event but a period of 1000 year long cooling - if anything what it was that caused the YD era delayed the end of the last ice age considerably.
"News reports about the discovery include speculation that it could be as young as 12,000 years; these assertions are based on the Younger Dryas impact hypothesis. Fragments of charcoal up to about 2 cm (0.79 in) in size that were recovered directly from the ice at the tip of the Hiawatha Glacier, where the glacial outwash containing sand interpreted to be either impact melt or shocked metamorphite was collected, yielded an age greater than 43,500 BP. This result was interpreted as an effect of "thermal degradation"; the true age is estimated to be 3-2.4 Ma."
That's anywhere from 2.4 to 3 million years old, not a confirmation at all.
@@mnomadvfx Dude, I know that. I round my words like rounding numbers to the highest decibel if that makes sense, Ice age as in glaciation period. My point is I believe we could’ve still been more in the glacial period if not for the younger dryas cataclysm. Or maybe not, I’m not gonna throw a fit if not lmao. Yes I know it’s still pending, it’s definitely not been confirmed to be 2mya idk why you’re claiming that, that’s just as off as saying 12,800. BUT, dude come on, there was definitely an impact(s) back then. Shocked quartz a wide swap of the planet, fields of hundreds of dead mammoths with broken legs all dating to the same time, ground zero’s of great floods dating back around that exact time like the scablands (also to point out, it’s been confirmed that they weren’t formed over time but within a violent few days) yeah.
And no maybe Hiawatha has nothing to do with it. But there was definitely an impact cataclysm as much as chixculub 66mya, just not near as bad. The potential mid disaster rate from Hiawatha’s size does puzzle in with the mid mass extinction of the younger dryas though. So until it’s fully confirmed I’m gonna keep puzzling Hiawatha with 12,800ya, but I more believe that there was probably multiple.
It brought the Clovis culture and the megafauna to an abrupt end. Out with the Clovis people, and in with the Folsom culture. Just imagine what the world would be like had the Younger Dryas not happened. We still might have megafauna roaming north America today.
Dynastic Egyptians couldn't have built Giza Plateau, Pyramids, and definitely not the Sphinx. They inherited it just like the Aztecs found Teotihuacan, The Inca found Machu Pichu. Stone Henge, Angor Wat, and many other Megalithic structures weren't built by hunter-gatherers with bronze tools. They were the cataclysmic survivors. When a comet strikes and takes out most of humanity, we will go back to those hunter-gatherers and start all over. The evidence from different fields of science is now overwhelming and finally being accepted just like the comet/meteor that took out the Dinosaurs. 'Atlantis' like resets have happened on this planet a lot more than we've been told. Right now WE are Atlantis.
It can be seen by the naked eye if you could see through ice so no, not the naked eye.
I'm so happy to see so many Graham, randall and Joe rogan fans here! Stay woke people have a blessed day.
don't use that word if you want people taking you seriously
otto mück's 1930 book 'the quest for atlantis' has corrsponding theories to the above....
the impact that separated the silicon based beings to carbon based beings we're nowadays
The Acraman crater is larger than the Chesapeake Bay crater (going by these size charts - 1:23 ).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Acraman_crater
What if the two impacts were only hours or minutes apart. Hale-Bopp impact on Jupiter as an example.
Surly, such a large impact would have left a layer of all the usual debris of meteorite impacts in the ice cores and indeed there are indications of a meteorite hit about that time. But the signature in the ice cores is weak and tenuous. A hit of that magnitude and in such close proximity to the rest of the Greenland Ice Sheet should have left a whopper of a signature. No such signature has been observed.
floods tend too wash away alot of evidence
I’m now convinced. I believe an advanced civilization was reset by cataclysmic events as Graham stated.
I believe iron is still being found from the astorods impact.
Nope you find iridium, same as a Nuclear Explosion
@@blackpearl6972 - dear Black pearl, brilliant assumption.. I'm working on a thesis involving nuclear blast theories creating these craters
and extinction level events. Can you elaborate and or give some reference sources.. thank u.
It would make sense if it was 12,000 years ago. It would explain those great floods when the glaciers in the north melted. The mass die off of life in North America. So much land was reclaimed by the oceans when those glaciers melted rapidly. So many lost civilisations as throughout history humans settled by coastlines and rivers. These great events were passed down over hundred of generations of people through stories which became altered every generation. We have heard of these tales such as Noah’s ark etc.
Graham Hancock hittin the default dance
Crater diameter is proportional to E^4. So this isn't really anywhere close to the Chesapeake Bay Crater in terms of energy.
this could be the impact that caused meltwater pulse 1a around 14,600 years ago
That crater was pushing 🅿️
When people talk of this I find it mmm narrow they should add all the other things that took place at the same millennium, Carolina bays ,the loss of flora and fauna, the evidence around north and south America's and Australia, or southern hemisphere. Planet took a shit kicking,glad that we finally getting a grip on our history.
That time period also coincides with mass melting of north America's ice-sheet and dumping of the Ice-lake, that must of destroyed the whole north America's eco system. ( Simply washed away by giant tidal wave over land by Ice water )
Check out the Geologists research of Randall Carlson
Someone is owed an apology
The real question is whether this caused melt-water pulse 1a :D
wouldn't this be 1b? 1a is between 14k and 15k years ago, this was around 13k years ago, which I believe is more in line with 1b.
About time someone besides Randall Carlson has seen the evidence for the Yoynger Dryus issue.
I do wish adults who spoke to adults narrated these things.
Thank you. Let's hope that the answers to many questions lies under Greenland ice.
That's a _cool_ discovery.
12.000 years old or maybe millions of years old, otherwise we don't have a clue how old it is 🤣😂
Evidence points to a young impact but, until further testing is performed, we have to be open to a wide window of dates, for now.
It has to be a reasonably young impact otherwise the glaciation would have erased it by now.
So I have a question for the geniuses out there,so a super eruption occurs blowing out mountains with huge chunks of rock thrown up into the stratosphere then they fall back to earth would this cause craters or not?would this not cause some of these and what if they got stuck up there like a satellite?
The amount of energy coming from a 1.5 km comet from space would make a large rock dropping from a volcanic explosion seem like a small pebble in comparison. It's not even close. The largest rocks ejected from Mount Sanit Helen's were the size of a big house.
2:07 An asteroid impact of that magnitude would cause massive tidal waves that would cover much of North America, not just flow into the world's oceans.
The USGS has a website with topographical maps. Take a look around the US sometime. The entire country is scarred with the evidence of an unbelievably massive flood. Take a look around Wisconsin and Minnesota. Those river valleys weren't formed by the rivers that currently run through them, and it didn't take millions of years to cut those large channels out. We know that there were 2 massive influxes of water going into the ocean at the end of the ice age. Since there's no natural source of heat on earth capable of melting glaciers fast enough to rapidly fill the oceans, the only other option is something from space hitting the earth, or the sun doing something. The sun doesn't leave impact proxies...impacts do. Since impact proxies are found all over the northern hemisphere at the Younger Dryas Boundary, it's pretty obvious something(s) smashed into earth and caused the glaciers to rapidly melt, resulting in extinctions and global destruction.
Scientists shocked. You don't say?!? Randall Carlson is the man!
The smoking gun has always been the abrupt disappearance of the apex animals in North America and Siberia.
Human predation in this one region and no where else on Earth... Yeah, no. Native peoples do not hunt animals to extinction. Modern Western man does that.
Amazing stuff, but they need to get a precise dating of the crater. A lot of scientists will be holding their breath until then.
So that's what happened to The Arctic's 100m+ thick Northern polar ice cap.
It was 5/7miles deep, an covered almost,
1, 3/rd of the Planet.
that impact, happened when the Arctic, was tropical.
One that big?It would not matter if ice was there or not.Take core's from it and the surrounding ice?
Graham Hancock predicted this!
Considering Dr. Velikovsky predicted this. I believe you should give him credit and cite his work. Chalk this up as another conspiracy theory that turned out to be true.
Remains inconclusive? You've seen those giant ripples in the landscape right ?
this could overturn the official record, an amazing discovery. lets see what the carbon dating gives us but if its from 12k years ago, this could be the reason and the skeptics were right.
This is not really a carbon datable thing. That is a measurement of an isotope of carbon found in living things. It's has a predictable half life as it decays and is reliable to an extent. There is likely no surviving organic material to date at this site. It would have been destroyed. There must be another dating technique but beyond ice core data I don't know what that could be.
"lets see what the carbon dating gives us"
There's still a ton of ice in the way - that's not happening anytime soon.
The fact they don't mention Hancock or Carleson is the most bullshit thing I have ever heard of.
First if all, well done Carlson and Hancock, but what about this:
Atlantis was actually capital of Anunaki warriors, leded by God (but actually the leader of those warrior aliens called yud-heh-waw-heh or Jahve), Ezekiel was the that was saying he met him personally, where divided fractions of Anunaki aliens made the whole stkry about humans. Anyway, the real problem is the age of the story..
Now, something happened with Atlantis but its not 2,5 thousand years ago (Ezekiel), or ancient Egypt around 300 years BC, or many more informations from that part of history, maybe the age is actually connected to this crater discovered in Grenland where Atlantis was situated, and got destroyed by weapon, not asteroid. Weapon which came from Anunaki fraction, which was in war with Jahve's army. Who are they, and where they comming from, its infront of our future to know, but this is how we (slaves of Anunakies) started life in this planet.
And nk, im not drinking or using drugs, jist thinking loudly..
Younger Dryas is real. IT happened!
I would like to suggest 12,800 years
Didn't one hit Greenland about 12,000 years ago??
What if Hudson Bay is the younger dryas crater
It’s been dated at 58 million years ago.
bright insight haver said something about this
As I hear more and more about solar micronova and electrical discharge, I wonder how we will ultimately tell the difference between impact and electrical discharge cratering?
4 million years for life to start but this event happened 12,800-11,600 years ago... hmmm
She said it was 4 million years for life to start again after the dinosaur extinction, NOT after the event 12500 years ago.
Has graham hancock actually discussed this crater?
Graham Hancock might be right after all
What??? Greenland is the Ice Wall.
More recent research puts the impact date at over 56 million years, debunking the younger dryas hypothesis
its 12k years old.
Jimmy @bright insight.....has the real scoop...loveya Jimmy!
please update your video time is wrong should be 2 millions years old and climate altering impact was at 12,900 years ago with very numerous comet impact across the world and in America in particular
Why is a Greenland crater named after an Iroquois leader?
Hmm. All that ice vaporized into the atmosphere. Is this the origin of the Noah's flood story?
Noahs ark isnt the only story of some heros that know the flood is coming before it hapoens. There's dozens and dozens of different stories of all different tongues that tell similar stories of floods taking place at the same time period. Which is very fascinating.
It is but it wasnt a piddly, comet, that's just ridiculous how can a piddly comet do all that damage.
IT CANT....
@@blackpearl6972 It could have been part of a non-piddly comet... The other / another maybe being the North American one...
Can this be considered something that supports the tale of Noah's Great Flood?
No.
No. But it may confirm that most flood myths from around the world were based on this catastrophic event.
No god, no chosen one, just a natural global cataclysm.
The end of the last ice age is the biblical flood...not a god thing
Noah flood, 11.5k yrs ago,
The only World wide flood, in 100k yrs, so the answer you want is Yes, it is, Noah's flood.
Very intresting
THANK YOU! VERY VERY INFORMATIVE! GRACIAS! BLESSINGS!
wow The Hiawatha Crater Existed was created by Asteroid impact Greenland on Earth!
Magicians of the Gods
That book is even more beautiful