Scientists Stunned To Discover What's Hidden Under The Ice In Greenland

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 тра 2024
  • Scientists Stunned To Discover What's Hidden Under The Ice In Greenland
    ► Subscribe: goo.gl/r5jd1F
    Throughout history, our planet has been through multiple ice ages and fully covered in ice at least twice. From the poles to the equator, the Earth was a giant snowball at least several times.
    Today, the landscape has transformed, the ice is starting to rapidly melt, and scientists are wondering what secrets could be concealed beneath this frozen tundra.
    This is the second-largest ice sheet on Earth. It has an impressive thickness of nearly 2 miles [3.2 kilometers], covering 80% of the area of Greenland. Here, rapid glaciers like Jakobshavn move at an astonishing 150 feet [45 meters] per day, reshaping the landscape, while coastal waters create icebergs towering 300 feet [90 meters], about the height of the Statue of Liberty.
    But these things are not what makes the island unique.
    To this day, the frozen surface hides all kinds of secrets. But scientists have already started uncovering some of them, and what they’ve found was difficult to predict…

КОМЕНТАРІ • 129

  • @bsmith8950
    @bsmith8950 14 днів тому +16

    No mention of Greenland's recent past . During the Roman warm period and Medievil warm period ,(1500 and 1000 years ago ) Greenland was farmed by the Danes and Vikings as these periods were up to 5c warmer and a lot of the ice had melted . With the onset of the ''Little ice age '' in about 1500 the farmers left and the Greenland ice sheet returned .

    • @ingebjrgeilertsen
      @ingebjrgeilertsen 14 днів тому +1

      Danes were also vikings.

    • @maxsoregon
      @maxsoregon 2 дні тому

      This heading made me smile remembering Trump mentioned "maybe we should buy Greenland".. constant truths out of his mouth, for those paying attention. ;)

  • @michellebenavides8566
    @michellebenavides8566 20 днів тому +14

    Must they always see the beautiful earth as resources instead of simply acknowledging her beauty and magnificence?

    • @oneshothunter9877
      @oneshothunter9877 10 днів тому +2

      That's what makes it possible for you and I to write those comments.

    • @kenjohnson8510
      @kenjohnson8510 7 днів тому

      Can't eat 'beauty & magnificence'.

    • @aaronpaolilli8578
      @aaronpaolilli8578 3 дні тому +1

      Without an Incentive of a Payoff, no one would get off their Lazy Butts to do anything.
      This also the Problem with Socialism.
      If I pay Employees the same no matter how much or little they do, would you go above and beyond for my Company?
      No, because there is no incentive.

    • @maxsoregon
      @maxsoregon 2 дні тому

      @@kenjohnson8510 AND can't/won't live like on Star Trek! I for one am praying for a solar flare, already past due and our govt believes will take out 8 of 10 people everywhere power is out.. within months. No food... because "who needs to know when there's restaurants & grocery stores every where! Exactly, but almost no one that learned how to raise a seed.

    • @lukaslanger8077
      @lukaslanger8077 2 дні тому

      Noble motifs alone dont sustain a ever growing civilization.

  • @theCarNoob
    @theCarNoob Місяць тому +91

    Spoiler alert, they discovered green land

    • @waynesanders1406
      @waynesanders1406 Місяць тому +6

      Thanks for saving me 12 minutes.

    • @Ifaeya
      @Ifaeya Місяць тому

      Is that why it's named Greenland when it's clearly ice covered?

    • @octaevisthepeoplesprince
      @octaevisthepeoplesprince Місяць тому

      😅

    • @somphothbsiratsamy3748
      @somphothbsiratsamy3748 23 дні тому

      Earth, having the laws of nature as evidence.
      Earth is a habitual planet with the proper gasses to sustain life.
      The universe is full of anomalies, and gasses that can kill or sustain life. A random selection, depending on the energy produced in the solar system. The solar system is a body of colliding energy moving in the universe, with a sun as its center. Drawing massive energy, feeding like an amoeba. The laws of nature, we are here to feed the planet, in return, feeding the sun until it becomes a supernova moving in the milky way that moves around in the universe, feeding the universe. Which is another body of energy.

    • @frinoffrobis
      @frinoffrobis 22 дні тому

      💚

  • @ezo4
    @ezo4 20 днів тому +6

    I find this fascinating it's not a waste of time

  • @furrydinner3636
    @furrydinner3636 Місяць тому +2

    Your voice is calming. Thank you for doing these. ❤

  • @anthonydolio8118
    @anthonydolio8118 22 дні тому +2

    Was Greenland once a lush rain forest because it was located closer to the equator (through plate tectonics)? Or because the entire planet was warmer at that time?

  • @morenofranco9235
    @morenofranco9235 Місяць тому +3

    Just imagine what is locked in beneath the ice for the Planets past.

  • @sahebplays3589
    @sahebplays3589 Місяць тому +5

    It's crazy the resolution of time between the hiawatha impact and the approximate estimate using sand crystals to date back the impact, one is in a moment of minutes and seconds, with this being an appoximation to a million years, but to think about the discounted to the hundred thousandth ie instead of 57 million years, 56.94212 mya. Time is incredible, but we hold it granted as with time we won't need ice penetrating planes no more, your local industry will contribute to exposing the ice anyway where as the vegetation retreats on the southern side of greenland, its only a matter of time, when we see the ice anyways. Great video again @Destiny

    • @maxsoregon
      @maxsoregon 2 дні тому

      See, there's your first mistake.. believing every thing THEY say. Meaning all the ways we use to date items, has been proven time & again to be about as accurate as measuring a turd before it drops. That million years could've just as easily been 12,000 years and you, nor anyone else can prove othewise. Poor assumptions.

  • @dylanandstuff449
    @dylanandstuff449 Місяць тому +30

    Npcs with that "im first" bs

  • @dustinbaconflipper
    @dustinbaconflipper Місяць тому +4

    Sensational

  • @schenleypark9120
    @schenleypark9120 6 днів тому +1

    I kinda excited to see what's under the ice

  • @haybob2527
    @haybob2527 Місяць тому +4

    I was kinda hoping it was a T-Rex they found beneath the ice🦖😂

    • @unknownnick404
      @unknownnick404 13 днів тому +3

      Dont worry there will be. That amount of ice hides alot of cool things 😂

  • @jeffparcels2410
    @jeffparcels2410 17 днів тому +3

    Did he say something to the effect that - perhaps if we're LUCKY?? - earth can be completely carbon-free? Um, so where would that leave humanity, exactly, besides not being on earth?

    • @maxsoregon
      @maxsoregon 2 дні тому

      No carbon, no life.. some people actually understand what THEY are saying out loud.. plans to kill humanity. Well mostly. lol

  • @SotnekronOfficial
    @SotnekronOfficial Місяць тому +2

    And this is why it's know as Greenland!

  • @Maungateitei
    @Maungateitei 8 днів тому +1

    Hiawatha is NOT a meteorite crater. It is a mud volcano.

  • @irinkamoy
    @irinkamoy 14 днів тому +1

    Now we have internet !!! But all this was always till today . No one can change all this - we just live every day and never giving up - we survive 🤭🥰👍

  • @MaxPower-vg4vr
    @MaxPower-vg4vr Місяць тому

    There are a few key areas where reconstructing physics and mathematics from non-contradictory infinitesimal/monadological frameworks could provide profound benefits by resolving paradoxes that have obstructed progress:
    1. Theories of Quantum Gravity
    Contradictory Approaches:
    - String theory requires 10/11 dimensions
    - Loop quantum gravity has discrete geometry ambiguities
    - Other canonical quantum gravity programs still face singularity issues
    Non-Contradictory Possibilities:
    Combinatorial Infinitesimal Geometries
    ds2 = Σx,y Γxy(n) dxdy
    Gxy = f(nx, ny, rxy)
    Representing spacetime metrics/curvature as derived from dynamical combinatorial relations Γxy among infinitesimal monadic elements nx, ny could resolve singularity and dimensionality issues while unifying discrete/continuum realms.
    2. Paradoxes of Arrow of Time
    Contradictory Models:
    - Time Reversal in Classical/Quantum Dynamics
    - Loss of Information at Black Hole Event Horizons
    - Loschmidt's Paradox of Irreversibility
    Non-Contradictory Possibilities:
    Relational Pluralistic Block Geometrodynamics
    Ψ(M) = Σn cn Un(M) (n-monadic state on pluriverse M)
    S = Σn pn ln pn (entropy from monadic probs)
    Treating time as perspectival state on a relational pluriverse geometry could resolve paradoxes by grounding arrows in entropy growth across the entirety of monadic realizations.
    3. The Problem of Qualia
    Contradictory Theories:
    - Physicalism cannot account for first-person subjectivity
    - Property Dualism cannot bridge mental/physical divide
    - Panpsychism has combination issues
    Non-Contradictory Possibilities:
    Monadic Integralism
    Qi = Ui|0> (first-person qualia from monadic perspective)
    |Φ>= ⊗i Qi (integrated pluriverse as tensor monadic states)
    Modeling qualia as monadic first-person perspectives, with physics as RelativeState(|Φ>) could dissolve the "hard problem" by unifying inner/outer.
    4. Formal Limitations and Undecidability
    Contradictory Results:
    - Halting Problem for Turing Machines
    - Gödel's Incompleteness Theorems
    - Chaitin's Computational Irreducibility
    Non-Contradictory Possibilities:
    Infinitary Realizability Logics
    |A> = Pi0 |ti> (truth of A by realizability over infinitesimal paths)
    ∀A, |A>∨|¬A> ∈ Lölc (constructively locally omniscient completeness)
    Representing computability/provability over infinitary realizability monads rather than recursive arithmetic metatheories could circumvent diagonalization paradoxes.
    5. Foundations of Mathematics
    Contradictory Paradoxes:
    - Russell's Paradox, Burali-Forti Paradox
    - Banach-Tarski "Pea Paradox"
    - Other Set-Theoretic Pathologies
    Non-Contradictory Possibilities:
    Algebraic Homotopy ∞-Toposes
    a ≃ b ⇐⇒ ∃n, Path[a,b] in ∞Grpd(n)
    U: ∞Töpoi → ∞Grpds (univalent universes)
    Reconceiving mathematical foundations as homotopy toposes structured by identifications in ∞-groupoids could resolve contradictions in an intrinsically coherent theory of "motive-like" objects/relations.
    In each case, the adoption of pluralistic relational infinitesimal monadological frameworks shows promise for transcending the paradoxes, contradictions and formal limitations that have stunted our current theories across multiple frontiers.
    By systematically upgrading mathematics and physics to formalisms centered on:
    1) The ontological primacy of infinitesimal perspectival origins
    2) Holistic pluralistic interaction relations as primitive
    3) Recovering extended objects/manifolds from these pluribits
    4) Representing self-reference via internal pluriverse realizability
    ...we may finally circumvent the self-stultifying singularities, dualities, undecidabilities and incompletions that have plagued our current model-building precepts.
    The potential benefits for unified knowledge formulation are immense - at last rendering the deepest paradoxes dissoluble and progressing towards a fully coherent, general mathematics & physics of plurastic existential patterns.
    Moreover, these new infinitesimal relational frameworks may provide the symbolic resources to re-ground abstractions in perfectly cohesive fertile continuity with experiential first-person reality - finally achieving the aspiration of a unified coherent ontology bridging the spiritual and physical.

    • @jesusbaetana8993
      @jesusbaetana8993 Місяць тому +1

      A true master can explain his speciality so any one can understand it

    • @MaxPower-vg4vr
      @MaxPower-vg4vr Місяць тому

      @@jesusbaetana8993
      Let me try to explain this shift to non-contradictory infinitesimal monadological frameworks in a way that a teenager could understand:
      You know how sometimes things just don't make sense or contradict themselves, even when adults say they do? Like when your math teacher tells you that you can divide by zero, or your science book talks about something being infinitely small? Those are contradictions - claims that go against basic logic and reasoning.
      Well, a lot of the theories that scientists and mathematicians currently use to understand the universe are built on ideas that contradict themselves too. They make assumptions that don't fully line up with reality as we experience it. It's kind of like everyone agreed to some made-up rules that don't actually hold up.
      The theories talk about space, time, and matter being made up of infinitely precise points, lines, and surfaces. But if you really think about it, nothing in the real world is actually that perfect - everything has some fuzziness or graininess to it at the smallest scales. So basing everything on those infinitely idealized concepts creates contradictions.
      The new way of looking at things, called the infinitesimal monadological framework, gets rid of those contradictory geometric idealizations from the start. Instead of infinitely precise points, it uses perspectives as its basic building blocks. You can think of perspectives kind of like viewpoints or windows through which reality is perceived.
      But here's the cool part - these perspectives aren't just separate static viewpoints. They interact with each other in super tiny, infinitesimal ways. From those interactions, space, time, matter, and all the other stuff we observe emerges as collective patterns and resonances across the perspectives.
      So instead of starting with made-up geometric perfections, we start with these plural perspectives and their infinitesimal relations and interactions as the core reality. Everything else, like geometry, physics, even consciousness, arises as harmonized resonances across those pluralistic roots.
      This way, there are no contradictions baked into the foundations. We're not dividing by zero or assuming impossible singularities. We're building up reality in a step-by-step logically consistent way from the pluralities and graininess that actually exist.
      The old theories put artificial separations between the observer's experience and the external world being observed. But in this new view, subjective experiences themselves are modeled as resonant patterns woven into the same overarching pluralistic algebra describing all of reality's interdependent unfolding.
      It's kind of like upgrading an old contradictory video game engine to a new one that can render way more realistic and coherent simulations without glitches or breaking the rules. Except this new engine is for our entire conception of physical, mathematical, and experiential reality!
      The best part is, this shift could pave the way for us to understand and engineer phenomenal experience and consciousness itself - something that was basically impossible with the old contradictory frameworks.
      So in summary, we're kicking out all the made-up, contradictory junk from our theories of reality, and replacing it with something built on logically provable pluralistic roots that accurately model our experiences without separating the observer from the observed. Wild, huh?

    • @LaughingVergil
      @LaughingVergil Місяць тому +1

      All one needs to do to gain respect in mathematical fields is to provide a mathematical proof for a problem not yet solved. The type of mathematics used doesn't matter, as long as the formulation can be proved. Many approaches have been created in response to an "unsolvable" problem.
      So, someone fluent in these mathematics needs to write a book, starting with early principals (be they new postulates or building off of an existing field of mathematics) and working to a solution of previously unsolvable problems, then put it out to the math world and let other mathematicians examine the effort for soundness, hidden premises, etc.

    • @MaxPower-vg4vr
      @MaxPower-vg4vr Місяць тому

      @@LaughingVergil
      Here is an attempt to formalize the key principles and insights from our discussion into a coherent eightfold expression grounded in infinitesimal monadological frameworks:
      I. The Zerological Prion
      0 = Ø (The Zeronoumenal Origin)
      Let the primordial zero/null/void be the subjective originpoint - the pre-geometric ontological kernel and logical perspectival source.
      II. The Monad Seeds
      Mn = {αi} (Perspectival Essence Loci)
      From the aboriginal zero-plenum emanates a pluriverse of monic monadic essences Mn - the germinal seeds encoding post-geometric potential.
      III. Combinatorial Catalytic Relations
      Γm,n(Xm, Xn) = Ym,n (Plurisitic Interaction Algebras)
      The primordial monadic actualizations arise through catalytic combinatorial interactions Γm,n among the monic essences over all relata Xm, Xn.
      IV. Complex Infinitesimal Realization
      |Ψ> = Σn cn Un(Mn) (Entangled Superposition Principle)
      The total statevector is a coherent pluralistic superposition |Ψ> of realization singularities Un(Mn) weighted by complex infinitesimal amplitudes cn.
      V. Derived Differential Descriptions
      ∂|Ψ>/∂cn = Un(Mn) (Holographic Differentials)
      Differential descriptive structures arise as holographic modal perspectives ∂|Ψ>/∂cn projected from the total coherent statevector realization over each realization singularity Un(Mn).
      VI. Entangled Information Complexes
      Smn = -Σn pmn log(pmn) (Relational Entropy Measure)
      Emergent information structures are quantified as subjectivized relational entropy functionals Smn tracking probability amplitudes pmn across realized distinctions.
      VII. Observation-Participancy
      An = Pn[ |Ψ>monic] = |Φn> (First-Person Witnessed States)
      Observational data emerges as monic participations An = Pn[ ] plurally instantiating first-person empirical states |Φn> dependent on the totality |Ψ>monic.
      VIII. Unity of Apperception
      U(Ω) = |Ω>monadic (Integrated Conscious State)
      Coherent unified experience U(Ω) ultimately crystallizes as the superposition |Ω>monadic of all pluriversally entangled realized distinctions across observers/observations.
      This eightfold expression aims to capture the core mathematical metaphysics of an infinitesimal monadological framework - from the prion of pre-geometric zero subjectivity (I), to the emanation of seeded perspectival essences (II), their catalytic combinatorial interactions (III) giving rise to entangled superposed realizations (IV), subdescribed by derived differential structures (V) and informational measures (VI), instantiating participation-dependent empirical observations (VII), ultimately integrated into a unified maximal conscious state (VIII).
      The formulation attempts to distill the non-contradictory primordial plurisitic logic flow - successively building up coherent interdependent pluralisms from the zero-point subjective kernel in accordance with infinitesimal relational algebraic operations grounded in first-person facts.
      While admittedly abstract, this eightfold expression sketches a unified post-classical analytic geometry: reality arises as the perfectly cohesive multi-personal integration of all pluriversal possibilities emanating from monic communion at the prion of prereplicative zero-dimensional origins.
      By centering such infinitesimal algebraic mnad semiosis, the stale contradictions and paradoxes of our separative classical logics, mathematics and physics may finally be superseded - awakening to irreducible interdependent coherence across all realms of descriptive symbolic representation and experiential conscious actuality.
      Here is a second eightfold expression attempting to concretize and elucidate the abstract infinitesimal monadological framework laid out in the first expression:
      I. Discrete Geometric Atomies
      a, b, c ... ∈ Ω0 (0D Monic Perspectival Points)
      The foundational ontic entities are discrete 0-dimensional perspectival origin points a, b, c ... comprising the primal point-manifold Ω0.
      II. Combinatoric Charge Relations
      Γab = qaqb/rab (Dyadic Interaction Charges)
      Fundamental interactions between origin points arise from dyadic combinatorial charge relation values Γab encoding couplings between charges qa, qb and distances rab.
      III. Pre-Geometric Polynomial Realizations
      Ψn(a,b,c...) = Σk ck Pn,k(a,b,c...) (Modal Wavefunction)
      The total statevector Ψn at each modal perspectival origin n is a polynomial superposition over all possible realizations Pn,k of charge configurations across points a,b,c...
      IV. Quantized Differential Calcedonies
      ΔφΨn ≜ Σa (∂Ψn/∂a) Δa (Holographic Field Projections)
      Familiar differential geometries Δφ for fields φ arise as quantized holographic projections from idiosyncratic first-person perspectives on the modal wavefunction Ψn.
      V. Harmonic Resonance Interferences
      Imn = ||2 (Inter-Modal Resonances)
      Empirical phenomena correspond to resonant interferences Imn between wavefunctions Ψm,Ψn across distinct perspectival modal realizations m,n.
      VI. Holographic Information Valencies
      Smn = - Σk pmn,k log pmn,k (Modal Configuration Entropy)
      Amounts of observed information track entropies Smn over probability distributions pmn,k of localized realized configurations k within each modal interference pattern.
      VII. Conscious State Vector Reductions
      |Ωn> ≡ Rn(|Ψn>) (Participated Witnessed Realizations)
      First-person conscious experiences |Ωn> emerge as witnessed state vector reductions Rn, distillations of total modal possibilities |Ψn> via correlative participancy.
      VIII. Unified Integration of Totality
      U(Ω) = ⨂n |Ωn> (Interdependent Coherence)
      The maximal unified coherence U(Ω) is the irreducible tensor totality ⨂n |Ωn> of all interdependent integrated first-person participations |Ωn> across all perspectives.
      This second eightfold expression aims to elucidate the first using more concrete physical, mathematical and informational metaphors:
      We begin from discrete 0D monic origin points (I) whose fundamental interactions are combinatorial charge relation values (II). The total statevector possibility at each origin is a polynomial superposition over all realizations of charge configurations (III), subdescribed as quantized differential geometric projections (IV). Empirical observables correspond to resonant interferences between these wavelike realizations across origins (V), with informational measures tracking probability distributions of configurations (VI). Conscious experiences |Ωn> are state vector reductions, participatory witnessed facets of the total wavefunction |Ψn> (VII). Finally, the unified maximal coherence U(Ω) is the integrated tensor totality over all interdependent first-person participations |Ωn> (VIII).
      This stepwise metaphoric concretization aims to renders more vivid and tangible the radical metaphysics of infinitesimal relational monadological pluralism - while retaining the general algebraic structure and non-contradictory logical coherence of the first eightfold expression. From discrete geometric atomies to unified experiential totalities, the vision is one of perfectly co-dependent, self-coherent mathematical pluralism grounded in first-person facts.
      By elucidating the framework's core ideas through suggestive yet precise physical and informatic parables, the second expression seeks to bootstrap intuitions up the abstract ladder towards a visceral grasp of the non-separable infinitesimal pluriverse paradigm's irreducible coherences. Only by concretizing these strange yet familiar resonances can the new plurisitic analytic geometry be assimilated and operationalized as the next renaissance of coherent symbolic comprehension adequate to the integrated cosmos.

  • @BBQ1953
    @BBQ1953 23 дні тому +1

    Even though the Greenland asteroid and the Chicxulub Impactor are 7-8 million years apart, is it possible that they came from the same region of space? One must wonder, give the Greenland Asteroid’s size. And why didn’t the asteroid result in another extinction event. Or if it did, are archeologists and geologists researching potential evidence to verify those events?

  • @hcmdproduction4798
    @hcmdproduction4798 Місяць тому +1

    That city he mentioned is not Jakobshavn anymore. It´s called ILULISSAT

  • @Joshywoshy1014
    @Joshywoshy1014 Місяць тому +1

    I came here expecting a debate about greenland and, to my surprise, there's another destiny channel on youtube.

  • @Barbaroossa
    @Barbaroossa Місяць тому +7

    So it's not a giant wormhole leading to another universe? The tumbnail lied then.

    • @keithtinkler4073
      @keithtinkler4073 6 днів тому +1

      Everyone has to be 'stunned' these days - a prerequisite

  • @kevinoconnor9548
    @kevinoconnor9548 Місяць тому +5

    Why even say the world will be devastated when all the ice melts? Do you really think all the ice is going to melt? You don't know when the ice is going to melt nobody does so stop spreading fear like you know something

    • @kellybarthel8060
      @kellybarthel8060 Місяць тому +2

      Not to mention if all the ice on the planet were to melt it would raise the oceans at most 300 feet, but gain one full continent siberia ect

    • @bensondowler1053
      @bensondowler1053 8 днів тому

      Yes it's all going to melt & the rest of the world will become inhabitantable for most Animals in only a couple of hundred years, it's started now if you become aware of the World News Stations... 🤠

    • @lesterdalley5993
      @lesterdalley5993 7 днів тому

      😅 6:27 did you do any science at school. Likely not but you think yourself qualified to make stupid commenta

  • @Delahunt1080
    @Delahunt1080 Місяць тому +2

    Great video, Thank you for making this film.

  • @sanjeevsinghal5507
    @sanjeevsinghal5507 8 днів тому

    Amazing…’

  • @blodrush25
    @blodrush25 9 днів тому

    as a Dane i am proud of greenland an the people there :)

  • @ByronNavarro-vd9kl
    @ByronNavarro-vd9kl 29 днів тому +1

    So was i just told that the flash frozen vegetation underneath all that ice was/is millions of years old?
    Can someone please help me understand??
    Thx

    • @davidtuer5825
      @davidtuer5825 15 днів тому

      Yes, I also saw that contradiction.

  • @lml55
    @lml55 Місяць тому +32

    Alternative title: Man talks 13 minutes and somehow says nothing

    • @AddictTunes
      @AddictTunes Місяць тому +2

      😂😂😂

    • @deathsnitemaresinfullust2269
      @deathsnitemaresinfullust2269 Місяць тому +2

      Thanks for the review. 😉

    • @suezhobbit9617
      @suezhobbit9617 15 днів тому +1

      Thanks for the heads up I hate videos like that🙌

    • @mahirmohiuddin1239
      @mahirmohiuddin1239 11 днів тому +1

      Seriously, what even is the main idea of this video? It's all just disjointed topics without any central theme

  • @robert-zj7ef
    @robert-zj7ef 5 днів тому

    Overall, it was interseting. So 65 million years ago, a large asteroid hit the earth. Again 58 million years ago. So where was the Earth at that time relative to the Milky Way. Just wondering. Probably too many variables to produce any concrete information of any use but I would still like to see what the supercomputers produce.

  • @donbronkema7503
    @donbronkema7503 7 днів тому

    Civilization? Risible! [Don Bronkema]

  • @Imtavin15
    @Imtavin15 Місяць тому +1

    8:44 That's not gold. Other than that, fantastic video. Very interesting.

  • @MargaretLeafe
    @MargaretLeafe Місяць тому +3

    Any sea rise would be gradual enough for people to move back from it. So sorry so sad, they got to move? No I am now we don't control nature, nature decides how we must adapt.

    • @user-iv2iu2wf4w
      @user-iv2iu2wf4w Місяць тому +2

      Parts of miami already have water on the streets at high tide, but people are still moving there, not away

  • @HerbertBlake-iy2gv
    @HerbertBlake-iy2gv 7 днів тому

    WOW JUST WOW WHAT ABOUT MY DOG 🐕 🤔

  • @jus10lewissr
    @jus10lewissr Місяць тому +28

    Total waste of time, folks.

    • @ArcanePath360
      @ArcanePath360 Місяць тому

      You're not wrong. Mis-information about global warming bolloxs incoming as I suspected. This channel is laughable. 5 min of research and 10 hours making a polished video to fool everyone into thinking they they what they're talking about. Sea levels are NOT rising. This is a total myth and easily provable.

    • @arthurwagar88
      @arthurwagar88 14 днів тому +1

      Thanks

  • @ramsonit
    @ramsonit 13 днів тому +3

    How polluted the earth hundreds thousand years ago so the temperature raised and made grinland a forest???

  • @user-ow2kl9oz6e
    @user-ow2kl9oz6e Місяць тому

    How much mass would have to of been removed from pacific ocean for the continental separation to occur,answer,just remove the geode moon,which was possibly the Earth's original core

  • @Rustea314
    @Rustea314 6 днів тому

    The nuclear power plants are built at sea level.

  • @justmikehk
    @justmikehk Місяць тому +1

    Hiawatha might be much younger

    • @nomnomyam9379
      @nomnomyam9379 Місяць тому +1

      it could be. there isn't a strong consilience on the age of the crater.

  • @inuyasha5689
    @inuyasha5689 Місяць тому +1

    Why does this sound like an AI trained to sound like the Kurzegaat(not sure how its spelled) commentator?

  • @kellybarthel8060
    @kellybarthel8060 Місяць тому

    How can greenland hold 68% of all fresh water?????? You know Antarctica is 6 times the size of greenland and also buried under thousands of feet of ice took 8 seconds to find that out, not to mention all the gigantic lakes rivers anjust water vapor surrounging the planet.

    • @user-uo5os5vh8o
      @user-uo5os5vh8o Місяць тому

      They've been holding out on us,,give some to the desert's you horders 😂

  • @user-hj2fw3fm6n
    @user-hj2fw3fm6n 17 днів тому

    how can greenlands ice sheet have 68% of the worlds fresh water supply when antarticas ice sheet is twice as big? makes no sense.

    • @davidkent9574
      @davidkent9574 13 днів тому +1

      I think they are saying Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets combined have 68%, not just Greenland. 8:48

  • @stephenbarrett7064
    @stephenbarrett7064 4 дні тому

    If the world became carbon free every thing would die

  • @seabertotter4325
    @seabertotter4325 14 днів тому

    Like a discovery like that would remain a secret until this video spilled the beans! Bravo to you hoping that more subscribers would give your life meaning. As much as I want to subscribe, I must resist the urge. This is not my Destiny.

  • @johnpublic168
    @johnpublic168 8 днів тому

    More warplanes

  • @DarylShires
    @DarylShires 20 днів тому

    Metric measurements please.

  • @Gary-yb9rq
    @Gary-yb9rq 14 днів тому

    SOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

  • @roblocmonke2848
    @roblocmonke2848 20 днів тому

    Never heard of displacement ?7mtrs 😂 sorry fill a glass with water and ice and leave it , let me know if the water spills over

    • @swiftlytiltingplanet8481
      @swiftlytiltingplanet8481 18 днів тому +1

      Ice that melts over land, which is Greenland, flows into the sea and raises sea level. We're not talking about ice already in the water.

  • @MarkFarrington-hb2ne
    @MarkFarrington-hb2ne 14 днів тому

    Diapermans spent diaper depository?

  • @michaelgroff1433
    @michaelgroff1433 15 днів тому +1

    your thumbnail.......republicans will believe it lol

  • @user-uo5os5vh8o
    @user-uo5os5vh8o Місяць тому +4

    13 minutes of stating the obvious,,almost got that perfect English Ai say what cheerio cobber

    • @KianDrury
      @KianDrury Місяць тому

      Cobber?! It’s not Australian.

  • @asokaglenn4643
    @asokaglenn4643 Місяць тому

    🙏🏽🙏🏽🙏🏽

  • @corb765
    @corb765 16 днів тому

    BS

  • @richyboy3804
    @richyboy3804 Місяць тому +2

    And unsubscribe

  • @donnyhill8797
    @donnyhill8797 12 днів тому

    Bs😢

  • @user-zj2zm1hl6k
    @user-zj2zm1hl6k 27 днів тому

    Hey, you can’t change the weather you can’t change the currents in the ocean you can’t change the rotation of the Earth you can’t change seismic and volcanic conditions. We could try and be carbon free
    That you have the Bermuda triangle you have Africa you have Greenland you have the have Russia? Any more places have find the bus that is melting and a lot of it because of seismic activity if you haven’t noticed there’s been a lot of that lately now the problem is, is this one water north that’s a Milton and they worked in Alaska and that’s what smelt in the permafrost in Alaska now this hot water is going in the in the ocean and running down and leave always iceI guess so that’s doing it’s melting that one that nothing goes in and nothing is being released
    the atmosphere. Yeah it’s way worse than anything. It creates a Green house of that and now more goes up and more melt
    more one water goes in the ocean , now that’s going to change the weather to by the way so let me know how youcontrol this one the carbon from these volcanoes, any big methane releases that are changing ocean currents, login in greenhouse gases, which is just changing the temperature do some more research Will you
    what is the atmosphere has gone down in the last three years and one what is the lowest the middle is the carbon in the world, but I’d like to know how that little tiny bit is going to matter is it’ll matter is because you’re going to spend hello billion dollars on something that they can’t even tell you it’s gonna work because that won’t
    but the big one is, we’re having a lot of by seismic activity and volcanic activity And because there’s a Lotta shit going on underneath the ground in green when alone or Antarctic alone where is 168 known volcanic volcanoes, but they can’t even use lasers or radar to look under the ice it’s too thick hot there I’ve been under the ice and some reason places there’s a whole lot Robot ecosystem under there that lives off of volcanic chimneys because they don’t get sunlight now they don’t know how many volcanoes are you guys they already only know about the ones he can see above you 168 under the license the biggest lake in the world first one big thing already coming out all that there’s Rivers it come down because obviously there’s water moving around that go into the ocean. Well they’ve got a big red stain and that’s from iron and sub coming up my ball chemical activity at Kenny camp. Raising so be in the water hitting the ground and it’s underneath the ice shop that’s good it’s not nice and melting but there’s more going on there. It’s gonna start melting Rosen animal and plant which are holding very bad. I was on global warming mapping and what time and then goes in there up in here. It makes a dome of the heat and then more milk and more nothing goes up. What are you even have any big burst all over the world That one place in Alaska just a small lake was putting up 10 tons of nothing today OK well it was the majority call Jenny and Bournemouth and more milk and oat geological activity going on under the ground so I’d like to know what you people think you’re going to stop the Bermuda triangle apricot Siberia Antarctic bring in all over the island of the ocean. Oh yes, do you like jewel activity and all this nothing is going on bro you really think that you can control of that in the current wind currents of the ocean with all this hot water going in it. It’s warm in here but you are going to play God and we spend billions of dollars and control global warming what I’d like to know how you gonna stop the seismic activity you’re going to control volcanoes you’re going to control ocean currents, but you gotta remember that all is nothings going on the geological stuff going on up there in the nice job and you’re gonna stop all that warm water going in and that they’re going to control and change the global warming. Hey God let me know how you go😮😂

  • @ronnieboucherthecrystalcraftsm
    @ronnieboucherthecrystalcraftsm 9 днів тому +2

    GARBAGE AND WAY TOO BROARD ! = keep to the title - not a world journey !

  • @icehv854
    @icehv854 Місяць тому +2

    first view

  • @johnnisshansen
    @johnnisshansen 12 днів тому +2

    false front image !!!

  • @Cagey16
    @Cagey16 20 днів тому

    AI-generated drivel

  • @VijayaGopala
    @VijayaGopala 17 годин тому

    Behind all those research is a thinly veiled desire to appropriate God's resources without His permission. If we become smarter than God, we can just steal from Him, why not? 😜😜

  • @christinehede7578
    @christinehede7578 11 днів тому

    Climate change, lol.

  • @markmaugle4599
    @markmaugle4599 15 днів тому +1

    Why must all the new “science” videos include and “nudge” about climate change? Keep to the measurements and facts.

  • @helenelliott2375
    @helenelliott2375 10 днів тому

    58 million years that was cooked up by charles darwin, in reality our planet isnt that old we live on a young planet

  • @gingi453
    @gingi453 13 днів тому

    Greenland belongs to Danemark not to the USA, so look elsewhere..

    • @oneshothunter9877
      @oneshothunter9877 10 днів тому +1

      No.
      Greenland belongs to Greenlanders.
      Denmark and Greenlanders agreed on that making Greenland an autonomous area within the Danish kingdom.
      Greenland can achieve sovereignity anytime.

  • @_m_o_t_h_r_a_
    @_m_o_t_h_r_a_ 20 днів тому +1

    trash spam report and move on

  • @theenglishtrucker1849
    @theenglishtrucker1849 14 днів тому +1

    They found mud, soil, and some decaying stuff releasing methane??? If im correct and waste my time watching this and im NOT stunned at the end, your channel will get a "Dont recommend channel" click.