This is the only UA-cam channel where I come before I make a decision on buying a new synth. I watch many other reviews, but this place is the best, it feels like I'm playing myself, I get all the answers, all the insights. I watched this review few times and I finally bought the Deluxe version. Thank you sir for such great and in depth reviews!
Having tried all 3 Hydras recently, I think the original 49-key is the sweet spot for me. Not too large to carry around, and not too small to make the polyAT keyboard pointless.
Just picked up the Explorer and it's no slouch. There is no noticeable aliasing so far and I don't anticipate any considering my limited sound design. The random button is super cool and the build quality is amazing considering the quality of the builds of most other synths in this price range. The polyphonic AT is very expressive and I find the keys surprisingly reactive. Thanks for helping me make my decision Loopop ☺️
I purchased a KB version in June of 2020 and it's still my favorite synth. Your original review was instrumental in helping me choose the HS and it's nice to see a "what's new" video that only touches on the new features. Thank you.
Sorry man, its not really a debate. Digital is 0s and 1s, it will never be as fat and full sounding as analog. Because of voltage, and electricity literally running though it. Check out Aturia's PolyBrute.
@@MichaelRohaly What? No, that's what digital is. No conversion, it just that- binary. Analog is transistors, capacitors and electrical conversion Check out the Poly Brute lol. It's an amazing snyth. If you like Hydra, it's the analog version of it. And you can hear the difference
@@youcaillou I personally decided to keep the 'keys' version. The desktop is still on my radar because of the smaller size and I like playing pads better than keys in general, but I'm still in love with the OG Hydra, and not sure I can get myself to part ways with it =P The biggest reasons I chose against trading in for the Explorer is the smaller sized keys, halved parameter display, and lack of the extra Arp knobs (that I tend to wiggle on the fly)
well im sold on the deluxe now. was on the fence the original vs deluxe . thank you so much for for the pro and con section answered alot of questions on the 4 models and the competition.
Love the Hydra. I've had the original since it came out and the only reason I just sold it was to buy the Deluxe. I've bought and quickly sold so many Korgs, Moogs, and Sequentials over that couple of years but I doubt I'll ever sell the Hydra. I like it more than some of my synths that cost 2-4 times more.
One of the things about the mutants that's so terrific is a mix level, as opposed to turning PWM or FM on or off. You can then add little bits of additional overtones to whatever you like if you play with ratios and depth to taste, and envelope that mix level. (And the ratio on most things!) It's possible that every other synth that does wave shaping does this, but I don't have those and on the HS it's wonderful.
For me the best thing about the Hydra is the EIGHT macros. Good preset collections typically have all eight macros set up, and that’s where the magic happens. On the presets I have created I spend more time on the macros than the initial sounds.
Thanks for such a great review. I got both Explorer and De Luxe and for my personal playing the Poly AT is just the best, I could only have it on my TS10 or the Seaboard but these guys are just way more fun. Most of the normal Joe would not care or understand the things under the hood, but that's why we are musicians, to translate all these tools to a language everyone can understand: music!! Thanks again!!!!
I purchased the desktop version and really am kind of regretting not having purchased the keys instead. Price was the primary driver for my decision as well as limited desktop space. I thought my Arturia keyboard controller would do the trick but now I realize how much I am missing by not having the key's version. But, I do like the finger pads, they are a fun way to play it and do still have the full synth engine and all but two of the knobs so, I'll live with my "mistake" and enjoy it immensely anyway. Maybe someday, I will have enough money to sell it and upgrade to the Deluxe...
I remember looking for the Desktop version the last year for months and finally bough mine at Black Friday. It's a great synth but, for me, creating your own patches isn't as easy and fast as many people say. It is not as user-friendly as I would liked. I found Iridium's layout more intuitive. But there are many things I really love of my Hydrasynth Desktop: its sound and morphing capabilities, its construction (it's a freaking tank!), its recessed ports (it looks tidier and there's less risk on breaking the ports when it's plugged) and its balanced output (take note Waldorf).
You're right, the iridium has a great interface and the huge screen helps alot but compared to other synth in its price range the hydra has still the easiest interface to work with and tweaking single parameters is a bliss, not having to dive into menu after menu.
I have a Hydra Deluxe, and managed to get an hour testing an Explorer in Store. Full credit to Loopop, but failed to mention that Deluxe has more Key travel, and the PolyAT is a lot smoother (less On/Off stepping, less accidental trigger, more pressure controllable/easy, and audible smoother transition in Timbre). It's a better Keyboard. I'll go further, the Deluxe has an excellent keyboard.
Wow this is great. The Deluxe really is Deluxe! love that bi-timbral mode and all the extra patch storage. I would love to see a software/firmware update that allows you to adjust the volume / mix of the thermin mode vs. keyboard volume when using theremin mode.
As with Matrixbrute the genius of Glen Darcey is all over this thing and the newer versions. For many I think whichever model suits should be the benchmark as a base/first "do-everything" first poly choice. If looking for something more specific and focused the 3 Korgs each do that and eclipse any Modal/Argon/Cobalt as an option IMHO. If it MUST be analog then you have left the building anyway for a Prophet or Summit or maybe Polybrute etc. with Deepmind as a not-mentioned SERIOUS dark horse with those onboard FX and modmatrix into them and how cheap a used 6 voice can be had for. Gross oversimplification but: old school analog plus killer onboard FX = Deepmind; must have serious wavetable/wave sequence/deep FM = Korg; everything else = one of these models for anyone on a budget at these price points.
Thanks, great review. MPE is a really important feature of the Hydrasynth to me. I control the Tabletop with my Linnstrument 128 with fantastic results. I also have a Cobalt 8 which is MPE capable, but I don't know if the other synths mentioned implement it. I think the the Cobalt has a somewhat better "analog" sound than the Hydra, better than many actual analog synths in fact, and the full size keybed feels great. The Hydra wins on versatility and digital timbres though... I would choose it over the Cobalt if pressed.
Have to respectfully disagree with regards to Cobalt 8 - was really disappointed with sound, to my ears it is far far off from Analogue - had a harsh timbre in the freq spectrum I couldn't ignore
FYI - looks like Sigabort's editor is no longer in beta but no mention about support yet beyond the original Hydras though I can't imagine it not working with Explorer and of course, there's a demo to try.
Thanks for your Hydrasynth videos. Doing production as a hobby in the box, I've been impressed by some of the really powerful and affordable software synths out there. But the 32 mini keys on my controller feel restrictive. It's been a long time since I took piano lessons but I still remember enjoying being able to get really expressive with it as it is. But I feel like hardware synths should more often embrace that they need not be constrained like a piano is and push the possibilities for expanded physical controls with things like polyphonic aftertouch, release velocity tracking, and ribbon controllers and/or joysticks. It's very cool to see a line of synths do pretty much all that and offer MPE support at a comparatively affordable price, in a 73 key board. The synth engine on its own seems really nice and well laid out with a great deal of potential, and I don't mind a steep learning curve given I'm trying to come to grips with the Synclavier V. I wonder if with a little coaxing over USB midi I could use Ableton Live or a plugin within it to make up for that missing sequencer when I really need it, too. Hopefully they can address most of your remaining criticisms with firmware updates. I also know Glenn told Syntaur in an interview for their podcast in October that he and his team have plans over the next few years to develop this line. Perhaps waiting a bit longer will bring us a new iteration of the engine and a Deluxe that puts a smartly laid out sequencer and features to enhance the synth's capability as an MPE midi controller where the empty space on the top currently is. But on the other hand the Deluxe can be had for surprisingly good prices right now and seems like an excellent tool for a journey outside the box. I've heard some people pull amazing custom patches out of it. Sonicstate's video on FM with the Hydrasynth engine had a preset where they had one oscillator wavescanning and another using the FM mutator on a simple sine wave, and it came together as this wonderful, emotive pad sound. The engine is fantastic as is; and I have software synths like Pigments 3 that could probably do some really cool things with that keyboard thanks to the MPE support too.
I know its a10+ year old design, and the parent company has almost forgotten about it, but I don’t see how you can compare a wavetable synth like Hydra to the “world” and not include the Access Virus TI. It is still one of the most powerful digital synths ever made and has a totally unique sound. I do think ASM did an excellent job of designing the interface on this keyboard. And the polyphonic AT definitely makes it stand out. But every time I listen to a demo of a Hydrasynth is sounds very digital and bright. And that could work for some applications. But then I go turn on my TI2, and although it can make those bright, chirpy, digital and FM sounds, it just absolutely floors me the breadth of sounds you can get from it and how fantastic it sounds when you want an aggressive, menacing sound. And although the TI VST interface no longer works with Apple, it still works perfectly well with Windows 10 (not sure about 11). Given that you can buy a used TI2 desktop for @$1200, I think it definitely deserves a comparison to the Hydrasynth or any other modern digital synth. I’d love to see you do a review of an Access Virus TI and share how you think it stacks up to today’s modern digital synths.
I didn’t mention a lot of others like Blofeld, Medusa and Kyra for example - but I don’t think I missed a feature in virus in my “others” list - let me know if I did. Virus is worth a look on the channel for sure regardless!
@@ErraticFaith It's great that you've found a setup you like. There's no need to dis other instruments though. If anyone is unfamiliar with the Hydra's sound, some good examples to check out are the "Secret Collection" and "Classic Collections" by Push-Pull, the Hydra sound demo by Jexus, and the Ignition patch banks. After hearing those, I doubt anyone could honestly call it tonally repetitive or unmusical. There are good reasons why ASM won the community's Best Synth Of The Year award both years ASM released products.
@@royansabah5733 Digitone is one of the best things Elektron has made. It makes good sounds, and up to four patches at a time, plus four midi tracks. It also has pretty unique features to algorithmically generate harmonically related tones by modulating parameters for ratio, waveform, and algorithm... plus an unusually powerful arpeggiator. This makes it kind of like a Moog Subharmonicon, but much more versatile and powerful. It also can do algorithmic sequencing of all its layers, which can be used kind of like a Korg Wavestate, for really complex patches and musical soundscapes. Or, with careful setup, it can be performed live. And the UI is pretty intuitive and easy to learn. The main downside of the Digitone is that it's limited by Elektron's 64-step (4 bar) pattern sequencer. This very strongly pushes the user into specific musical styles and structures, and in particular, tends to get people stuck in a short loop. I've done longer compositions on Elektron devices, but the Elektron workflow made it take waaaaay longer than it should have, because it's really not designed for that. It's designed for the user to loop a single pattern over and over while muting/unmuting tracks and turning knobs, then maybe switch to a second pattern and do the same thing, and so on... and for its most skilled users, songs tend to be only 1 to 4 patterns long. Oh, and its midi capabilities are very limited. Elektron only allows access to a small subset of what midi can do. So... it can be great, but it didn't work well for me. Like, when I used Elektron gear for a short 3-minute song with a more traditional structure, it ended up needing ~25 patterns spread across two pattern banks, and 13 tracks. And it was a huge pain to make. To see what the Digitone (and Digitakt) are good at, look for some of Ehsan Gelsi's videos. Or Cuckoo recently uploaded a Sega-styled Digitone game soundtrack. Or Red Means Recording has demonstrated some really cool stuff with it. To see what the Elektron workflow is really bad at, I uploaded a song called "Easy Does It", where I forced a Digitakt to do a more traditional linear song structure. I can't recommend that anyone else try that, because the workflow is terrible for that type of song structure. Of course, none of this is relevant for a Hydrasynth... because it's not a sequencer. It's just a synth, designed for performance and patch creation. A Hydra needs to be part of a larger studio, to provide other voices, since it's not meant for doing entire songs by itself. So like, add a DAW, to layer and arrange multiple recordings... or for dawless, it needs other gear to handle sequencing and play other voices. Personally, since I don't like all the complexities and overhead of using a computer for music, what I've found works best for me is an Akai Force. It's a DAW in hardware form, and provides everything I need for making music. I also like to have one nice synth though, and a mic.
One thing that's uniquely appealing to me is how the Hydrasynths would be a perfect first synth for anyone learning synthesis. There's plenty more features for more advanced synth users and sound designers to have fun. Something for everyone. My only gripe is that I'm not impressed with many of the factory presets. However, there are lots of talented people who make and sell custom patches. The ones I've tried have convinced me to keep my HSD.
(Knowing I’ve already written a comment, I’ve got another one. It’s June 12, 2024. I finally took delivery of an Explorer 5 days ago. I’ve already had some fun creating my own patches on it. One (momentary) challenge is activating the aftertouch (from the front panel) and directing it to LFO depth as with Preset A001. Otherwise, it’s awesome having a virtual analog that’s capable of largely being an Odyssey with patch memory storage (or an OBXa).
I wish there was more good patches / custom good patch demos of the hydra out there. It’s capable of patches so much better and more interesting than most of the presets
I was about to say the very same thing. I just got my Hydrasynth Deluxe a few days ago. The really good patches are amazing, and while the multi-patches (deluxe only) are better than the single-patches, the vast majority are not very musical. They really let the synth down, and I don't get it.
Nice video:) some Notes about the “only 8 waves per wavetable” isn’t completely accurate. There are 8 single waves used to create a wavetable with over 14 thousand (or was it hundred thousand I forget) waves in it. So by choosing those 8 points, there is 24 bits of interpolation between each of those steps. A cool way to see this is set a macro to wavescan and set the macro depth very shallow (say 10 out of 128) and notice there will still be no stepping heard as you morph through the wavetable. Bringing its wavetable resolution far beyond “8” and far beyond the typical 256 or so that most others would do.
Thanks! Yes, I'm aware that Hydras morph between waveforms and show it in my main video from two years ago. The vast majority of wavetable synths have an interpolation feature (so, for example, Peak morphs/interpolates very smoothly between 5 waveforms in a table, but it still only has 5 in a table). Having a larger number of waveforms in a table allows for more complex timbres, for example, even speech synthesis, or wavetables derived from interesting samples. That's not something you can do with only 8 waveforms in a table no matter how many interpolation points you have between them. For example, see the "hello loopop" wavetable in my review of Iridium here: ua-cam.com/video/5HP-fmyt0y4/v-deo.html
@@loopop sure, just noting how it was worded because it can be confusing. Many also don’t do this (such as the kyra for example which does not smoothly morph between waveforms). Speech synthesis is another topic in iridium is not quite the same but I get what you are saying. Again, great video.
thanks again :) just to clarify re Iridium - it doesn't have a dedicated speech synthesis engine - it's just a one time algorithm that takes text you type in and converts it to a standalone set of waveforms in a wavetable - that runs within their regular wavetable synth
I personally like to route an envelope follower through the CV input, and modulate the Amp level down. When following my Kick, it acts as sidechain compression.
Looks extremely tempting! Do you know if the desktop version has the ability to monophonically execute portamento glide from note to note? Outstanding review as always Mr. Loopop!
Always helping, never boring. Many thanks for both Hydrasynth presentations. I have an additional question. You have mentioned de Luxe is bitimbral, so I assume that one can control 2 seperate layers/splits via 2 separate MIDI channels from, for example, external sequencer. Am I right? Best Regards Marek Tomczak
Great Review as always. I ordered the Explorer 3 days ago. Reveiw get 4.5 out of 5 stars. I took away half a star because this I was hoping for a return of the cute dancing harmonics.
Hello! great review.I'm interested in the Explorer but I didnt know about this seamless patch switching that other synths have. Wich ones that compete with the explorer has this feature? Thanks for making this awesome videos.
There is one thing missing from the Hydrasynth line that has stood between me and seriously considering getting something such as the Explorer. None of them have a vocoder feature. I realize that it is more about sound shaping that is about sound processing and that most wavetable synthesizers don’t include a vocoder. However, it is something that I have become accustomed to seeing in a virtual analog models.
While I agree that the ribbon is a bit "icing", once you start playing with Poly AT for a while, your hands will just want to do it by default. I find myself moving individual fingers for AT even on MonoAT synths now. :D
I'm now really glad I haven't impulse-bought the original HS. The Deluxe is all I could have ever wanted from the HS. It'll play really nice with my Summit... (Seems very clearly inspired conceptually and in design by the Summit, but I say that in the best possible way!)
I can't wait to finish moving house so I can unbox my stuff, including my HS Keys! These firmware updates are great but there was one thing I wished for that I don't think they've addressed: I think it's still impossible to switch the pitch glide to "constant time". It always operates like "constant rate", which isn't always what's needed, musically speaking.
Yep, once again loopop gets my GAS going - I bought the Hydrasynth Keyboard. Thanks loopop, I wouldn't have done it without you. Maybe you could revisit the Hydrasynths since ASM released the ver2.0 firmware? Great job, as ever, thanks!
Loopop is thee encyclopedia for all of my music needs. Thank you good sir. Given this was a year ago, I’d like to ask, any updates on your wishes for future updates?
I was really impressed with the Deluxe.... honestly thought about getting the Deluxe almost solely for the 6 octave poly-aftertouch keyboard with ribbon controller, arps and full midi/NRPN out... I don't need another large poly. But at that price point, it's almost worth getting over the Novation SL61 Mk3... Though I'm hoping Novation does a Mk4 with that kind of keyboard and Behringer does a Desktop version of the DS-80 :D
Hydrasynth has a much better keyboard than the clacky SQ-80. I have a SL mk3 and while it is awesome it is only single channel aftertouch. While I am keeping the SL for the arps and midi control capabilities, the SQ-80 is going as soon as the Deluxe arrive. I recommend the Deluxe over any other keybed atm. No one else has poly aftertouch and the ribbon is everything. :-)
Great video....but when selecting a different sound in the Deluxe version...does the first sound stop abruptly or is there smooth transition to the next sound? Thanks
I definitely love the layout of the Hydrasynth but I think the Deluxe could have 8 more knobs and displays and be even more epic. The sound is nice but I am not sure if it is superb. But your video is, as always, thank you!
Does the poly after touch translate to say access virus kc if using the virus as a master keyboard? And if you had a choice between the Jupiter, X and the hydra deluxe synth, which one would you choose and why because the piano was very disappointing in my opinion on the hydra synthesizer. I thought that they put that much great work into the device that it would have a great piano sound and natural piano sound variations.?
"Randomly randomize everything" is pretty much my whole approach to making music. One question, can the little Explorer be powered off a usb power bank instead of the batteries?
I may revisit the HS Explorer sooner rather than later due to its Polytouch, portability, and pricepoint. It also has the new key off velocity feature found on it and the Deluxe. Real estate in my gear-space is pretty much non-existant, so size/weight is a huge concern. A few of my other synths may have some overlap with the HS, but some have specs and features that the HS does not have...
I’ve been lusting over Hydra and Peak, and the Explorer will only add to my quandary. Too bad they omitted the MIDI Thru, but maybe more understandable on a keyboard device. Thanks, as always, for the comprehensive reviews!!
Most devices allow you to set midi thru in settings. Honestly it's not a problem. But peak is not Hydrasynth. What makes Hydrasynth Hydrasynth is the Poly AT. It's life changing.
@@nathanjames4242 I made hour long videos about both and there are plenty of other sound demos - my recommendation is don’t outsource the decision re what inspires you - if you’ve seen both and neither calls you, just wait and see what else does. Imho of course
Channel AT is exceptionally limited and relatively useless with modern complex sounds. However, NRPN high-resolution Poly AT with Release Velocity on the ASM Hydrasynth Deluxe separates ASM from current synth manufactures and allows a keyboard to emulate a stringed instrument creating a new level of expression many professionals have been waiting for since the 80's.
I’m looking for a new synth about the price point of the explorer. Would you prefer the modal cobalt 8 or the hydrasynth explorer? Or is there a synth around this price point that stands out the more than any other?
Hello my friend.....I LOVE your reviews and trust your opinion about synths. I own a Sub 37 and Dave Smith (RIP) Prophet 6 and wanted to add a new keyboard to my home studio and made a spontaneous purchase yesterday and bought a Polybrute. I still a have time to change my mind and purchase a Hydrastynth. I was also considering an Access Virus T12 polar. If you had to choose one synth to complement the Moog Sub 37 and Prophet, which synth would you choose? Thanks for your advice✌️
This is the only UA-cam channel where I come before I make a decision on buying a new synth. I watch many other reviews, but this place is the best, it feels like I'm playing myself, I get all the answers, all the insights. I watched this review few times and I finally bought the Deluxe version. Thank you sir for such great and in depth reviews!
Thanks for taking the time to write :)
10:15 (Hydrasynth) “Well, that’s not very nice.”
I highly appreciate the new video structure with pros, cons, and vs other separately.
Thank you. Explorer model looks more interesting to me after watching this than it did at first glance.
Having tried all 3 Hydras recently, I think the original 49-key is the sweet spot for me. Not too large to carry around, and not too small to make the polyAT keyboard pointless.
Just picked up the Explorer and it's no slouch. There is no noticeable aliasing so far and I don't anticipate any considering my limited sound design. The random button is super cool and the build quality is amazing considering the quality of the builds of most other synths in this price range. The polyphonic AT is very expressive and I find the keys surprisingly reactive. Thanks for helping me make my decision Loopop ☺️
I purchased a KB version in June of 2020 and it's still my favorite synth. Your original review was instrumental in helping me choose the HS and it's nice to see a "what's new" video that only touches on the new features. Thank you.
Got my hydrasynth a few days ago. Incredible machine! Sounds so good! Makes the digital vs analog debate obsolete!
Lol ya no….
😅
Sorry man, its not really a debate. Digital is 0s and 1s, it will never be as fat and full sounding as analog. Because of voltage, and electricity literally running though it. Check out Aturia's PolyBrute.
@@atonegames I'll check that out on UA-cam where it's all converted to ones and zeros.
@@MichaelRohaly What? No, that's what digital is. No conversion, it just that- binary. Analog is transistors, capacitors and electrical conversion Check out the Poly Brute lol. It's an amazing snyth. If you like Hydra, it's the analog version of it. And you can hear the difference
Awesome video again! I don’t understand any of this, but very fun to listen to!
Awesome! I've been mulling over trading in my "Keys" for an Explorer, and this helped answer that question. Thanks!
How did you decide?
@@youcaillou I personally decided to keep the 'keys' version. The desktop is still on my radar because of the smaller size and I like playing pads better than keys in general, but I'm still in love with the OG Hydra, and not sure I can get myself to part ways with it =P The biggest reasons I chose against trading in for the Explorer is the smaller sized keys, halved parameter display, and lack of the extra Arp knobs (that I tend to wiggle on the fly)
Just purchased the Deluxe because of this video. Thank you for all the information!!!
well im sold on the deluxe now. was on the fence the original vs deluxe . thank you so much for for the pro and con section answered alot of questions on the 4 models and the competition.
Love the Hydra. I've had the original since it came out and the only reason I just sold it was to buy the Deluxe. I've bought and quickly sold so many Korgs, Moogs, and Sequentials over that couple of years but I doubt I'll ever sell the Hydra. I like it more than some of my synths that cost 2-4 times more.
One of the things about the mutants that's so terrific is a mix level, as opposed to turning PWM or FM on or off. You can then add little bits of additional overtones to whatever you like if you play with ratios and depth to taste, and envelope that mix level. (And the ratio on most things!) It's possible that every other synth that does wave shaping does this, but I don't have those and on the HS it's wonderful.
True
For me the best thing about the Hydra is the EIGHT macros. Good preset collections typically have all eight macros set up, and that’s where the magic happens. On the presets I have created I spend more time on the macros than the initial sounds.
A strong point for me was the excellent build quality. Really robust and the keybed with MPE is a joy to play. Better than my Moog Fatar.
But the Moog sounds Fatter...
Thanks for such a great review. I got both Explorer and De Luxe and for my personal playing the Poly AT is just the best, I could only have it on my TS10 or the Seaboard but these guys are just way more fun. Most of the normal Joe would not care or understand the things under the hood, but that's why we are musicians, to translate all these tools to a language everyone can understand: music!! Thanks again!!!!
I purchased the desktop version and really am kind of regretting not having purchased the keys instead. Price was the primary driver for my decision as well as limited desktop space. I thought my Arturia keyboard controller would do the trick but now I realize how much I am missing by not having the key's version. But, I do like the finger pads, they are a fun way to play it and do still have the full synth engine and all but two of the knobs so, I'll live with my "mistake" and enjoy it immensely anyway. Maybe someday, I will have enough money to sell it and upgrade to the Deluxe...
Wanna trade
I remember looking for the Desktop version the last year for months and finally bough mine at Black Friday.
It's a great synth but, for me, creating your own patches isn't as easy and fast as many people say. It is not as user-friendly as I would liked. I found Iridium's layout more intuitive.
But there are many things I really love of my Hydrasynth Desktop: its sound and morphing capabilities, its construction (it's a freaking tank!), its recessed ports (it looks tidier and there's less risk on breaking the ports when it's plugged) and its balanced output (take note Waldorf).
You're right, the iridium has a great interface and the huge screen helps alot but compared to other synth in its price range the hydra has still the easiest interface to work with and tweaking single parameters is a bliss, not having to dive into menu after menu.
I have a Hydra Deluxe, and managed to get an hour testing an Explorer in Store. Full credit to Loopop, but failed to mention that Deluxe has more Key travel, and the PolyAT is a lot smoother (less On/Off stepping, less accidental trigger, more pressure controllable/easy, and audible smoother transition in Timbre). It's a better Keyboard. I'll go further, the Deluxe has an excellent keyboard.
A brilliant review, as usual. Thank you!
Wow this is great. The Deluxe really is Deluxe! love that bi-timbral mode and all the extra patch storage. I would love to see a software/firmware update that allows you to adjust the volume / mix of the thermin mode vs. keyboard volume when using theremin mode.
Buying the original Hydra keyboard version is the best money I've ever spent on equipment. It still blows me away.
That was my experience too.
you are simply the best presenter of synths on the planet ,-
I enjoy my HS KB. I just wish they’d allow saving of chord mode settings inside the patch.
As with Matrixbrute the genius of Glen Darcey is all over this thing and the newer versions. For many I think whichever model suits should be the benchmark as a base/first "do-everything" first poly choice. If looking for something more specific and focused the 3 Korgs each do that and eclipse any Modal/Argon/Cobalt as an option IMHO. If it MUST be analog then you have left the building anyway for a Prophet or Summit or maybe Polybrute etc. with Deepmind as a not-mentioned SERIOUS dark horse with those onboard FX and modmatrix into them and how cheap a used 6 voice can be had for. Gross oversimplification but: old school analog plus killer onboard FX = Deepmind; must have serious wavetable/wave sequence/deep FM = Korg; everything else = one of these models for anyone on a budget at these price points.
Thanks, great review. MPE is a really important feature of the Hydrasynth to me. I control the Tabletop with my Linnstrument 128 with fantastic results. I also have a Cobalt 8 which is MPE capable, but I don't know if the other synths mentioned implement it. I think the the Cobalt has a somewhat better "analog" sound than the Hydra, better than many actual analog synths in fact, and the full size keybed feels great. The Hydra wins on versatility and digital timbres though... I would choose it over the Cobalt if pressed.
Have to respectfully disagree with regards to Cobalt 8 - was really disappointed with sound, to my ears it is far far off from Analogue - had a harsh timbre in the freq spectrum I couldn't ignore
FYI - looks like Sigabort's editor is no longer in beta but no mention about support yet beyond the original Hydras though I can't imagine it not working with Explorer and of course, there's a demo to try.
Thanks for your Hydrasynth videos. Doing production as a hobby in the box, I've been impressed by some of the really powerful and affordable software synths out there. But the 32 mini keys on my controller feel restrictive. It's been a long time since I took piano lessons but I still remember enjoying being able to get really expressive with it as it is. But I feel like hardware synths should more often embrace that they need not be constrained like a piano is and push the possibilities for expanded physical controls with things like polyphonic aftertouch, release velocity tracking, and ribbon controllers and/or joysticks.
It's very cool to see a line of synths do pretty much all that and offer MPE support at a comparatively affordable price, in a 73 key board. The synth engine on its own seems really nice and well laid out with a great deal of potential, and I don't mind a steep learning curve given I'm trying to come to grips with the Synclavier V. I wonder if with a little coaxing over USB midi I could use Ableton Live or a plugin within it to make up for that missing sequencer when I really need it, too. Hopefully they can address most of your remaining criticisms with firmware updates.
I also know Glenn told Syntaur in an interview for their podcast in October that he and his team have plans over the next few years to develop this line. Perhaps waiting a bit longer will bring us a new iteration of the engine and a Deluxe that puts a smartly laid out sequencer and features to enhance the synth's capability as an MPE midi controller where the empty space on the top currently is.
But on the other hand the Deluxe can be had for surprisingly good prices right now and seems like an excellent tool for a journey outside the box. I've heard some people pull amazing custom patches out of it. Sonicstate's video on FM with the Hydrasynth engine had a preset where they had one oscillator wavescanning and another using the FM mutator on a simple sine wave, and it came together as this wonderful, emotive pad sound. The engine is fantastic as is; and I have software synths like Pigments 3 that could probably do some really cool things with that keyboard thanks to the MPE support too.
I know its a10+ year old design, and the parent company has almost forgotten about it, but I don’t see how you can compare a wavetable synth like Hydra to the “world” and not include the Access Virus TI. It is still one of the most powerful digital synths ever made and has a totally unique sound. I do think ASM did an excellent job of designing the interface on this keyboard. And the polyphonic AT definitely makes it stand out. But every time I listen to a demo of a Hydrasynth is sounds very digital and bright. And that could work for some applications. But then I go turn on my TI2, and although it can make those bright, chirpy, digital and FM sounds, it just absolutely floors me the breadth of sounds you can get from it and how fantastic it sounds when you want an aggressive, menacing sound. And although the TI VST interface no longer works with Apple, it still works perfectly well with Windows 10 (not sure about 11). Given that you can buy a used TI2 desktop for @$1200, I think it definitely deserves a comparison to the Hydrasynth or any other modern digital synth. I’d love to see you do a review of an Access Virus TI and share how you think it stacks up to today’s modern digital synths.
I'd watch that review.
I didn’t mention a lot of others like Blofeld, Medusa and Kyra for example - but I don’t think I missed a feature in virus in my “others” list - let me know if I did. Virus is worth a look on the channel for sure regardless!
I would love to own a Virus!
I regret selling my Medusa and blofeld, but the Medusa was especially interesting. What a unique synth!
“But loopop told me I could put my succulents here! How does that void any warranty?!?”
As always, fantastic review. Thank you so much.
If you can only have one synth... a Hydra is definitely one of the best.
It will be my only!
@@ErraticFaith It's great that you've found a setup you like. There's no need to dis other instruments though.
If anyone is unfamiliar with the Hydra's sound, some good examples to check out are the "Secret Collection" and "Classic Collections" by Push-Pull, the Hydra sound demo by Jexus, and the Ignition patch banks. After hearing those, I doubt anyone could honestly call it tonally repetitive or unmusical. There are good reasons why ASM won the community's Best Synth Of The Year award both years ASM released products.
Yes, I'm thinking about it, but what do you think about Elektrons Digitone?
@@royansabah5733 Digitone is one of the best things Elektron has made. It makes good sounds, and up to four patches at a time, plus four midi tracks. It also has pretty unique features to algorithmically generate harmonically related tones by modulating parameters for ratio, waveform, and algorithm... plus an unusually powerful arpeggiator. This makes it kind of like a Moog Subharmonicon, but much more versatile and powerful. It also can do algorithmic sequencing of all its layers, which can be used kind of like a Korg Wavestate, for really complex patches and musical soundscapes. Or, with careful setup, it can be performed live. And the UI is pretty intuitive and easy to learn.
The main downside of the Digitone is that it's limited by Elektron's 64-step (4 bar) pattern sequencer. This very strongly pushes the user into specific musical styles and structures, and in particular, tends to get people stuck in a short loop. I've done longer compositions on Elektron devices, but the Elektron workflow made it take waaaaay longer than it should have, because it's really not designed for that. It's designed for the user to loop a single pattern over and over while muting/unmuting tracks and turning knobs, then maybe switch to a second pattern and do the same thing, and so on... and for its most skilled users, songs tend to be only 1 to 4 patterns long. Oh, and its midi capabilities are very limited. Elektron only allows access to a small subset of what midi can do.
So... it can be great, but it didn't work well for me. Like, when I used Elektron gear for a short 3-minute song with a more traditional structure, it ended up needing ~25 patterns spread across two pattern banks, and 13 tracks. And it was a huge pain to make.
To see what the Digitone (and Digitakt) are good at, look for some of Ehsan Gelsi's videos. Or Cuckoo recently uploaded a Sega-styled Digitone game soundtrack. Or Red Means Recording has demonstrated some really cool stuff with it.
To see what the Elektron workflow is really bad at, I uploaded a song called "Easy Does It", where I forced a Digitakt to do a more traditional linear song structure. I can't recommend that anyone else try that, because the workflow is terrible for that type of song structure.
Of course, none of this is relevant for a Hydrasynth... because it's not a sequencer. It's just a synth, designed for performance and patch creation. A Hydra needs to be part of a larger studio, to provide other voices, since it's not meant for doing entire songs by itself. So like, add a DAW, to layer and arrange multiple recordings... or for dawless, it needs other gear to handle sequencing and play other voices.
Personally, since I don't like all the complexities and overhead of using a computer for music, what I've found works best for me is an Akai Force. It's a DAW in hardware form, and provides everything I need for making music. I also like to have one nice synth though, and a mic.
You like over the Take 5 Sequential? I am ready for first Poly
One thing that's uniquely appealing to me is how the Hydrasynths would be a perfect first synth for anyone learning synthesis. There's plenty more features for more advanced synth users and sound designers to have fun. Something for everyone.
My only gripe is that I'm not impressed with many of the factory presets. However, there are lots of talented people who make and sell custom patches. The ones I've tried have convinced me to keep my HSD.
Its an unfair comparison purely based on how glorious this synth sounds. For me the deluxe is just a dream synth,endless possibilities.
(Knowing I’ve already written a comment, I’ve got another one.
It’s June 12, 2024. I finally took delivery of an Explorer 5 days ago. I’ve already had some fun creating my own patches on it. One (momentary) challenge is activating the aftertouch (from the front panel) and directing it to LFO depth as with Preset A001. Otherwise, it’s awesome having a virtual analog that’s capable of largely being an Odyssey with patch memory storage (or an OBXa).
I wish there was more good patches / custom good patch demos of the hydra out there. It’s capable of patches so much better and more interesting than most of the presets
I would say that about every synth
It is a synthesizer. If you buy it, you can make as many as you like. ;)
@@DrJ3RK8 obviously 🙄 😂 but it’s nice when a synth comes with some preprogrammed, great sounding starting points to help spark ideas.
I was about to say the very same thing. I just got my Hydrasynth Deluxe a few days ago. The really good patches are amazing, and while the multi-patches (deluxe only) are better than the single-patches, the vast majority are not very musical. They really let the synth down, and I don't get it.
@@Hardts Are any of the factory patches from known sound designers?
Polyphonic aftertouch on the £519 Explorer is pretty cool. Key-off is interesting too, though I'm not sure how much I'd use it.
Nice video:) some Notes about the “only 8 waves per wavetable” isn’t completely accurate. There are 8 single waves used to create a wavetable with over 14 thousand (or was it hundred thousand I forget) waves in it. So by choosing those 8 points, there is 24 bits of interpolation between each of those steps. A cool way to see this is set a macro to wavescan and set the macro depth very shallow (say 10 out of 128) and notice there will still be no stepping heard as you morph through the wavetable. Bringing its wavetable resolution far beyond “8” and far beyond the typical 256 or so that most others would do.
Thanks! Yes, I'm aware that Hydras morph between waveforms and show it in my main video from two years ago. The vast majority of wavetable synths have an interpolation feature (so, for example, Peak morphs/interpolates very smoothly between 5 waveforms in a table, but it still only has 5 in a table). Having a larger number of waveforms in a table allows for more complex timbres, for example, even speech synthesis, or wavetables derived from interesting samples. That's not something you can do with only 8 waveforms in a table no matter how many interpolation points you have between them. For example, see the "hello loopop" wavetable in my review of Iridium here: ua-cam.com/video/5HP-fmyt0y4/v-deo.html
@@loopop sure, just noting how it was worded because it can be confusing. Many also don’t do this (such as the kyra for example which does not smoothly morph between waveforms). Speech synthesis is another topic in iridium is not quite the same but I get what you are saying.
Again, great video.
thanks again :) just to clarify re Iridium - it doesn't have a dedicated speech synthesis engine - it's just a one time algorithm that takes text you type in and converts it to a standalone set of waveforms in a wavetable - that runs within their regular wavetable synth
I'm so glad I chose the Hydra as my first flagship synth ❤️
"or Succulent" ....... that made me smile on a Monday.....
A Blofeld fits perfectly on the right hand end of the Deluxe and layering it with the HD produces some very interesting timbres!
I personally like to route an envelope follower through the CV input, and modulate the Amp level down. When following my Kick, it acts as sidechain compression.
You can do that in the post FX section....pick the compressor effect and select the MOD 1 or 2 as your sidechain input source...adjust to taste
Looks extremely tempting! Do you know if the desktop version has the ability to monophonically execute portamento glide from note to note? Outstanding review as always Mr. Loopop!
I think the Hydrasynth Deluxe is now my dreamsynth
Always helping, never boring. Many thanks for both Hydrasynth presentations. I have an additional question. You have mentioned de Luxe is bitimbral, so I assume that one can control 2 seperate layers/splits via 2 separate MIDI channels from, for example, external sequencer. Am I right?
Best Regards
Marek Tomczak
what about the keybed action feel in comparison of 49 key's hydrasynth ?
Great review! What is the length/width of the blank area + shelf on the Deluxe? Wondering what is the biggest item I could possibly put there.
Thanks! A smidge more than 13 inches (33cm) wide and 11 inches (28cm) deep with the shelf
Great Review as always. I ordered the Explorer 3 days ago. Reveiw get 4.5 out of 5 stars. I took away half a star because this I was hoping for a return of the cute dancing harmonics.
Hello! great review.I'm interested in the Explorer but I didnt know about this seamless patch switching that other synths have. Wich ones that compete with the explorer has this feature? Thanks for making this awesome videos.
There is one thing missing from the Hydrasynth line that has stood between me and seriously considering getting something such as the Explorer. None of them have a vocoder feature. I realize that it is more about sound shaping that is about sound processing and that most wavetable synthesizers don’t include a vocoder. However, it is something that I have become accustomed to seeing in a virtual analog models.
While I agree that the ribbon is a bit "icing", once you start playing with Poly AT for a while, your hands will just want to do it by default. I find myself moving individual fingers for AT even on MonoAT synths now. :D
I'm now really glad I haven't impulse-bought the original HS. The Deluxe is all I could have ever wanted from the HS. It'll play really nice with my Summit... (Seems very clearly inspired conceptually and in design by the Summit, but I say that in the best possible way!)
I can't wait to finish moving house so I can unbox my stuff, including my HS Keys! These firmware updates are great but there was one thing I wished for that I don't think they've addressed: I think it's still impossible to switch the pitch glide to "constant time". It always operates like "constant rate", which isn't always what's needed, musically speaking.
Is the Keybed on the 49 Keyboard the same feel on the Deluxe or does the Deluxe feel more semi-weighted?
What an amazingly comprehensive review.
Literally was pondering this exact question.
Loopop is the best.
Thanks for your fantastic work! It's always superb!
Yep, once again loopop gets my GAS going - I bought the Hydrasynth Keyboard. Thanks loopop, I wouldn't have done it without you. Maybe you could revisit the Hydrasynths since ASM released the ver2.0 firmware? Great job, as ever, thanks!
My pleasure! I cover so many instruments, I rarely re-visit firmware updates unfortunately
I've never wanted to buy a synth so much after seeing a review.
Loopop is thee encyclopedia for all of my music needs. Thank you good sir. Given this was a year ago, I’d like to ask, any updates on your wishes for future updates?
Thanks! Just what's in the wishlist here and in my original video
Hydrasynth Deluxe vs System 8? Which is better?
The polyphonic aftertouch is brilliant, and worth it!
I was really impressed with the Deluxe.... honestly thought about getting the Deluxe almost solely for the 6 octave poly-aftertouch keyboard with ribbon controller, arps and full midi/NRPN out... I don't need another large poly. But at that price point, it's almost worth getting over the Novation SL61 Mk3... Though I'm hoping Novation does a Mk4 with that kind of keyboard and Behringer does a Desktop version of the DS-80 :D
Hydrasynth has a much better keyboard than the clacky SQ-80. I have a SL mk3 and while it is awesome it is only single channel aftertouch. While I am keeping the SL for the arps and midi control capabilities, the SQ-80 is going as soon as the Deluxe arrive. I recommend the Deluxe over any other keybed atm. No one else has poly aftertouch and the ribbon is everything. :-)
Have you sold the SQ-80? The only synth I’d replace my ESQ-1 with would be the SQ-80.
Great video....but when selecting a different sound in the Deluxe version...does the first sound stop abruptly or is there smooth transition to the next sound? Thanks
Nymphes soon?
I definitely love the layout of the Hydrasynth but I think the Deluxe could have 8 more knobs and displays and be even more epic.
The sound is nice but I am not sure if it is superb.
But your video is, as always, thank you!
20:31. Have you tried the latest Microfeak update?
Hydrasynth, Cobalt 8x or minilogue which would you choose for the best features, price for what you get, and for sound design
Great review! what about the keybed action feel of the deluxe in comparaison of the original one ? (less noisy ?)
You must be living in a warehouse :). Amazing compare.
Hidden feature @ 09:55 ...
Succulent support.
What will they think of next?
Does the poly after touch translate to say access virus kc if using the virus as a master keyboard? And if you had a choice between the Jupiter, X and the hydra deluxe synth, which one would you choose and why because the piano was very disappointing in my opinion on the hydra synthesizer. I thought that they put that much great work into the device that it would have a great piano sound and natural piano sound variations.?
"or a succulent, if you like"
I feel personally attacked.
"Randomly randomize everything" is pretty much my whole approach to making music. One question, can the little Explorer be powered off a usb power bank instead of the batteries?
Not over USB but if you follow the power supply specs (12v 2A center positive) my guess is it should work - but verify with the company
9:40 kudos! instant like for that :)
I may revisit the HS Explorer sooner rather than later due to its Polytouch, portability, and pricepoint. It also has the new key off velocity feature found on it and the Deluxe. Real estate in my gear-space is pretty much non-existant, so size/weight is a huge concern. A few of my other synths may have some overlap with the HS, but some have specs and features that the HS does not have...
Sneaky OMD.
I love my Hydrasynth.
Thanks for this. Helpful.
Have you tried the Take 5 yet? I’m looking for my first synth.
I have not tried it, it sounds great but you're paying a premium for analog and the sequential brand, which is ok if that's what you want.
So looking forward to seeing this.
Thanks for suffering APv22.
Thanks and oh man, I feel like I need a hug after using Premiere 22 - I mean, I'm already locked up in their prison, why the abuse?
Go.DM!!! It sounded pretty close.
Does the Explorer have the same presets as the original keyboard version?
I’ve been lusting over Hydra and Peak, and the Explorer will only add to my quandary. Too bad they omitted the MIDI Thru, but maybe more understandable on a keyboard device. Thanks, as always, for the comprehensive reviews!!
Most devices allow you to set midi thru in settings. Honestly it's not a problem. But peak is not Hydrasynth. What makes Hydrasynth Hydrasynth is the Poly AT. It's life changing.
What about vs the MiniFreak? Which do you feel gives you better inspiration?
what matters really is what would give you inspiration :)
@@loopop Well, neither because I have no experience with either. If I did, I would have just asked myself instead of you. :)
@@nathanjames4242 I made hour long videos about both and there are plenty of other sound demos - my recommendation is don’t outsource the decision re what inspires you - if you’ve seen both and neither calls you, just wait and see what else does. Imho of course
What is a "knob per function" synth with keys that you can recommend?
An update concerning the new Minibrute would be great!
finally a keyboard that can compare with the GEM s2!!
Channel AT is exceptionally limited and relatively useless with modern complex sounds. However, NRPN high-resolution Poly AT with Release Velocity on the ASM Hydrasynth Deluxe separates ASM from current synth manufactures and allows a keyboard to emulate a stringed instrument creating a new level of expression many professionals have been waiting for since the 80's.
Looking at the current range, a desktop with 16 voices would be a killer.
I’m looking for a new synth about the price point of the explorer. Would you prefer the modal cobalt 8 or the hydrasynth explorer? Or is there a synth around this price point that stands out the more than any other?
Both are great but I chose the hydrasynth explorer for many features that I like.
Can't go wrong with either.
You're a legend!
why no sequencer? :(
Hello my friend.....I LOVE your reviews and trust your opinion about synths. I own a Sub 37 and Dave Smith (RIP) Prophet 6 and wanted to add a new keyboard to my home studio and made a spontaneous purchase yesterday and bought a Polybrute. I still a have time to change my mind and purchase a Hydrastynth. I was also considering an Access Virus T12 polar. If you had to choose one synth to complement the Moog Sub 37 and Prophet, which synth would you choose? Thanks for your advice✌️
Thanks! Since you trust me, trust me when I say no one can answer that for you. Get the one that will inspire you to create!
Hi Man, what I didn't understand if the parameters you see on the explorer are 4 at a time but you can still modify 8 of them, or not?
Thank you
only 4 at a time but you can still modify all the same parameters
beautiful synths!!!
Biggun has a succulent shelf. Sold!
deluxe seems like a dream synth but for money explorer would be just fine for me.
does it have digital output? if not.... would be cool to add it to nowadays synths