At the time, Bill Clinton's enemies were mostly the same people that were behind the frameup of LaRouche. His actions in Ireland for instance reflected his somewhat human behavior before Gore and the Principles Committee took over.
OaklandLYM so, instead of finding truth he relied on the enemy of my enemy ideology. Again, lacks credibility. I listen for the few nuggets of info that fit the empty spaces, but I have to apply a lot of salt to that info.
@@Crow-gg5se Believe it or not, he was making policy decisions that were pissing the British off such as his Irish policy so no surprise that Mellon Scaife, a lunatic billionaire that financed LaRouche slanders was also attacking Clinton or MI6 agents organizing US Militia groupa against Clinton, etc.
@@LyndonLaRoucheArchive There is *no need to attack Trump when he has proven that he is willing to do, at times, the right thing* for the United States. It is better to not piss on the person who is trying to help you, right? Now the enemies of Clinton became some of the major backers of Trump: Conrad Black, the Mellons & Scaifes (Newsmax), Arnaud de Borchgrave (Newsmax) and the MEGA group (which basically made up the board of British SOE's Hollinger International), the Council for National Policy et al. However, this is completely illusory seeing that these factions ARE NEVER LOYAL to the people they back and thrive off the opportunism of people like the Clintons. Larouche has always tried to treat people who are willing to work with his essential program, as friends, even individuals who otherwise have disgusting associations, because Larouche knows that we are in a crisis. The cynics know we are in a crisis but want to go down with the ship.
I have heard this guy talk about how great Bill and Hillary Clinton are. How can he be given credibility?
At the time, Bill Clinton's enemies were mostly the same people that were behind the frameup of LaRouche. His actions in Ireland for instance reflected his somewhat human behavior before Gore and the Principles Committee took over.
OaklandLYM so, instead of finding truth he relied on the enemy of my enemy ideology.
Again, lacks credibility. I listen for the few nuggets of info that fit the empty spaces, but I have to apply a lot of salt to that info.
@@Crow-gg5se Believe it or not, he was making policy decisions that were pissing the British off such as his Irish policy so no surprise that Mellon Scaife, a lunatic billionaire that financed LaRouche slanders was also attacking Clinton or MI6 agents organizing US Militia groupa against Clinton, etc.
@@LyndonLaRoucheArchive There is *no need to attack Trump when he has proven that he is willing to do, at times, the right thing* for the United States. It is better to not piss on the person who is trying to help you, right? Now the enemies of Clinton became some of the major backers of Trump: Conrad Black, the Mellons & Scaifes (Newsmax), Arnaud de Borchgrave (Newsmax) and the MEGA group (which basically made up the board of British SOE's Hollinger International), the Council for National Policy et al. However, this is completely illusory seeing that these factions ARE NEVER LOYAL to the people they back and thrive off the opportunism of people like the Clintons.
Larouche has always tried to treat people who are willing to work with his essential program, as friends, even individuals who otherwise have disgusting associations, because Larouche knows that we are in a crisis. The cynics know we are in a crisis but want to go down with the ship.