15 INCREDIBLE Vintage Planes

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 162

  • @bobcornwell403
    @bobcornwell403 3 роки тому +22

    A couple of inaccuracies:
    1.) Blimps are not zeppelins. Zeppelins had a rigid structure. Blimps got almost all their shape from lifting gas and air pressure.
    2.) The 1903 Wright Flyer never flew more than 200 ft before crashing. This was because it was terribly pitch unstable. The 1906 model was really the world's first real airplane, as it could return to where it took off from.

    • @WinterHawke2007
      @WinterHawke2007 3 роки тому +3

      The fourth 1903 flight actually went for 852 feet and 59 seconds, but you are correct in that it was unstable. Their third plane, the 1905 flyer was substantially better, establishing a flight of 39 minutes / 24 miles.

    • @dahawk8574
      @dahawk8574 25 днів тому

      Being unstable is not necessarily a problem. Consider how easy it is to put the tip of a yardstick, and then balance it in the palm of your hand. Absolutely unstable, yet very easy to do.
      The Wright brothers practiced for years to develop skill in piloting their unstable gliders. So putting an engine with props was a very easy step for them to master.
      So...
      The 1903 Flyer was most definitely the World's First Successful Airplane.
      It would be correct to assert that it was not, however, a practical design. They accomplished practicality a few years later back at Huffman Prarie. And then on Aug 8, 1908, showed the world how they were the ones who solved all of the problems that prevented everyone else from succeeding.
      There were a handful of inventors who did achieve success in certain aspects in isolation. But the Wright brothers were extremely methodical and persistent, and they were the ones who put all of the elements together for the very first time.
      ...and they achieved this on Dec 17th, 1903.
      Of all the necessary various elements, there was one singular aspect in which they were first, with no one coming close:
      Control.
      Most especially, roll control. Now here, special acknowledgment is due to Glenn Curtiss. He too arrived at a solution for achieving roll control. His elegant invention of ailerons is what quickly became the standard, used on nearly every single airplane flying today. While no one uses the Wright brothers' approach.
      Prior to Curtiss, and prior to the Wright brothers, the common method for those who attempted roll control was shifting the pilot's weight. This was extremely crude, and utterly unscalable.
      So credit for the practical airplane belongs fully to the Wright brothers, followed by Glenn Curtiss.

  • @caseysmith544
    @caseysmith544 3 роки тому +13

    Very first plane is Misspelled. Louis not Louise.

  • @Chiller01
    @Chiller01 3 роки тому +20

    De Havilland DHC-2 Beaver should make the list. Quintessential bush pilot plane and perhaps the most reliable aircraft ever built.

    • @TheOldGord
      @TheOldGord 3 роки тому +1

      That and the Otter.

    • @johnbockelie3899
      @johnbockelie3899 3 роки тому +1

      St. Louise ??? I thought it was St.Louis.

    • @johnbockelie3899
      @johnbockelie3899 3 роки тому

      P 51 was the sports car of fighter planes. The P 51- B was often mistaken for Me 109 s because of its square cockpit and tail.

  • @MisterOcclusion
    @MisterOcclusion 3 роки тому +12

    I didn't expect a nod to the Arrow. Cheers

  • @richardcarnahan5184
    @richardcarnahan5184 2 роки тому +5

    Oh wow! That's my brother's plane at approx minute 3:05. And him flying it.
    He has owned a dozen or so aircraft over the years, but the little unassuming Cub had so far been the most pleasing of the bunch.

  • @CCC-b1n
    @CCC-b1n 2 місяці тому +2

    7:28 The Bleriot XI is perhaps my favorite plane. He built it in his backyard like Henry Ford did with the Model T?

  • @stevemac6707
    @stevemac6707 3 роки тому +9

    The Spirit Of St Louise?? I think someone didn't check the segment title spelling..... O.o

  • @thephilster6860
    @thephilster6860 3 роки тому +12

    Jeeze, where do I start? How about this--you need a fact-checker. Like, to make sure that the video is that of the actual airplane. That the narration is correct. That the narration matches the video.

  • @c150gpilot
    @c150gpilot 3 роки тому +6

    The Spirit of St LOUISE? What is this, a junior high science project?

  • @kenkahre9262
    @kenkahre9262 3 роки тому +11

    Typo - Its "Spirit of St. Louis', NOT 'Louise'.

    • @martinphilip8998
      @martinphilip8998 3 роки тому

      I’ve got that postage stamp in my collection.

  • @BlenderStudy
    @BlenderStudy 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you for the update, Top Fives..!! Amazing Wright brothers..!!

    • @cornbreadfedkirkpatrick9647
      @cornbreadfedkirkpatrick9647 3 роки тому +1

      Again they weren't the first there's proof they heard about a guy named Whitehead a few years earlier.

  • @Samtzu
    @Samtzu 3 роки тому +2

    That little known plane, "The Spirit of St. Louise".... she was a sweetheart....

  • @jeremiahperryman948
    @jeremiahperryman948 3 роки тому +3

    A lot of the planes on this list would not be considered vintage!!!

  • @michaelvalenzuela2528
    @michaelvalenzuela2528 3 роки тому +5

    Blimps and Zeppelins are two entirely different aircraft,

  • @sirclarkmarz
    @sirclarkmarz 3 роки тому +10

    Talks about zeppelins but shows blimps , rutans Voyager what's not the first to fly around the world nonstop it was the first to fly around the world nonstop unrefueled , B 20 nines for pressurized in order to fly at high altitudes and that's what helped to increase its range ,

    • @carbide1968
      @carbide1968 3 роки тому +2

      I'm far from a plane expert but holy cow, nearly every plane and explanation was absolutely wrong. Especially about blimps.

  • @johnrussell4413
    @johnrussell4413 Рік тому +2

    The best of all is the Spitfire.... not even mentioned here...

  • @rollrick7500
    @rollrick7500 3 роки тому +3

    Thanks for teaching me interesting facts I otherwise wouldn’t care to know.

    • @rollrick7500
      @rollrick7500 3 роки тому

      That’s creepy

    • @GreenRottenRabbit
      @GreenRottenRabbit 3 роки тому

      What about rocketeer rosy want to have RPGs in your face

    • @memphisrains1008
      @memphisrains1008 3 роки тому

      I hope your the real Mr Beast....if not shame on you...

    • @GreenRottenRabbit
      @GreenRottenRabbit 3 роки тому +1

      @@memphisrains1008 he ain't the real beast but I am a utuber :3

    • @Bianchiboy
      @Bianchiboy 3 роки тому

      I wouldn’t listen too much if I were you, the guy starts off with ‘Spirit of Saint Louise’ …. It’s Actually ‘Louis’

  • @holydayactiontv
    @holydayactiontv 3 роки тому

    So fantastic video

  • @uprebel5150
    @uprebel5150 3 роки тому +3

    St. Louise?

  • @prathibhayr6594
    @prathibhayr6594 3 роки тому

    Nice video

  • @Chompchompyerded
    @Chompchompyerded Рік тому +1

    I used to wish I could have a Bleriot Damoiselle. It was just such a cool looking plane, and these days would qualify as an ultralight.

  • @MajesticKicks10
    @MajesticKicks10 3 роки тому

    Great information

  • @easyrecipesanddeliciousfoo2954
    @easyrecipesanddeliciousfoo2954 3 роки тому +1

    😳😳😳😳WOW !

  • @christopherbatty3837
    @christopherbatty3837 3 роки тому +2

    C172...WHY DEPICTIONS OF C150 ???? ✈

  • @gfodale
    @gfodale 3 роки тому +5

    Piper J3 was also the mainstay of the Civil Air Patrol, which flew over the coasts looking for, and reporting U-Boats.

    • @johnbockelie3899
      @johnbockelie3899 3 роки тому

      But The Hindenburg was Hydrogen filled. They usually have helium bags.
      Hydrogen may be lighter, but it's highly explosive. Germany was banned to have helium after World war one.

    • @gfodale
      @gfodale 3 роки тому

      @@johnbockelie3899 I was not going to reply, as your comment has no relevance to my initial comment. There are statements which need to be addressed however. In the period between the two world wars, rigid lighter than air, airships, hydrogen was the standard. Not helium. Helium was a by-product of the oil fields in the U.S. and it was not exported to any other nation at the time. It was considered a 'national resource'. Hence why Britain's R-101 (R-100? I'm working off memory here.) burst in flames when crashing in France. Germany was banned from building Zeppelins after WW I. It had nothing to do with helium, as helium was an exclusive product of the U.S. Zeppelin, the company, survived the initial banning of their product by working for other countries. (U.S. included.) By WW II, we (the U.S.) were using blimps rather than rigid LTA airships. We still had exclusive use of the helium. It was sometime after WW II that helium started to be exported.

  • @englishbooks7424
    @englishbooks7424 3 роки тому +2

    What about the X-15, the MiG-15, the MiG-25, the F3Y, the 747, the 707, the 727 and so many others?

  • @dahawk8574
    @dahawk8574 25 днів тому

    0:19 - Saint LouWeeze

  • @michaelmckinnon7314
    @michaelmckinnon7314 2 роки тому +1

    Blimps are basicly controlled balloons, but Zeppelins are rigid airships. The B-29 made several stops flying around the world, but Burt Rutan's Voyager flew nonstop around the world.

    • @pbcoop62
      @pbcoop62 2 роки тому

      Rutan was also able to do it without refueling.

  • @rayperkins6006
    @rayperkins6006 3 роки тому +3

    Alcock and Brown first flew the Atlantic in 1919 in a WW1 biplane.

  • @Allen46u5k
    @Allen46u5k 6 місяців тому +1

    Swoop Gas history

  • @clydecessna737
    @clydecessna737 3 роки тому +2

    US Air Force was created in 1947 from the US Army Air Forces in 1941 which was in tern created from the US Army Air Corps created in 1926. There are several antecedents before that too.

  • @darkiee69
    @darkiee69 3 роки тому +3

    The J3 was a civilian trainer, not a military one.

    • @balsachopper7
      @balsachopper7 11 місяців тому

      The J-3 WAS used as a military trainer during and after WW2.

  • @RWBHere
    @RWBHere 6 місяців тому

    Charles Lindbergh was something like the 27th person to fly across the Atlantic.But he was the first person to do it solo and in one flight. A number of aircraft had flown via the Azores from Britain, via Iceland, Greenland, and then into Canada.
    John Alcock and Arthur Brown were the first to fly across in one leg, in an open cockpit Vickers Vimy, in 1919, from Newfoundland to Ireland, proving that direct flights across that ocean were possible, 12 years before Lindbergh's flight.

  • @jeremiahperryman948
    @jeremiahperryman948 3 роки тому +1

    On slightly more positive note the airplane that you mentioned that was built in 1909 is still kept in flightworthy condition to this very day and it nearly the oldest if not the oldest flightworthy airplane in existence today!!!

  • @alexanderperry1844
    @alexanderperry1844 3 роки тому +7

    Disappointing. No mention of the Me163, De Havilland Mosquito, De Havilland DHC-2 Beaver, De Havilland Comet, Gossamer Condor/Albatross or Me262. Also, Alcock and Brown crossed the Atlantic in 1919; Lindburgh was a late starter.

    • @grantrichards4950
      @grantrichards4950 3 роки тому

      Lindbergh did it solo; a much more difficult feat.

  • @chucketherington4723
    @chucketherington4723 Рік тому +1

    There were many inaccuracies. It might be a good idea to get an edit from someone experienced in the field you are reporting on.

  • @zippyt.libertine3787
    @zippyt.libertine3787 10 місяців тому +1

    Ain't ever heard of no stinkin' saint Louise!

  • @rolandemartin854
    @rolandemartin854 7 місяців тому

    What happened to the B-52? It's one of the most Iconic planes built by Boeing Acft. It's the oldest bomber still in use today and has proven to be very versatile in it's use. Cannot believe that it was skipped over!!

  • @nickfraser2434
    @nickfraser2434 6 місяців тому

    One of the views of the C-172 was a c-150 Aerobat! an aerobatic category (+6/-3G) two seater. Distinctive checkerboard livery.

  • @chinary8
    @chinary8 23 дні тому

    You said both the B59 and Voyager were the first to fly around the world non stop. Which is it?

  • @jhs8496
    @jhs8496 3 місяці тому

    Talks about Zeppelins. Shows blimp footage. Niiice.

  • @RetiredSailor60
    @RetiredSailor60 3 роки тому

    My late father owned a Stinson, 1946 Cessna 140, and 1959 Cessna 172 Skyhawk.

  • @BasicB111ch
    @BasicB111ch 3 роки тому +2

    It's the guy from simple history

  • @darkiee69
    @darkiee69 3 роки тому +1

    Messerschmitt Me 262, the first jet in service?
    Saab J35 Draken
    Saab J37 Viggen

  • @lawrencehearn6080
    @lawrencehearn6080 6 місяців тому

    British aviators Alcock and Brown flew across the Atlantic in a Vickers Vimy bomber in 1919

  • @alejmonzon
    @alejmonzon 7 місяців тому

    Yak 3, Mig 15, Mig 21, Mig 29

  • @mikepowell2776
    @mikepowell2776 3 роки тому +10

    Hang on! Both Dick Routan and the B29 can’t each be the first to fly round the World non-stop. You might mention that Rutan’s flight was un-refuelled.
    Likewise, Zeppelin was an airship manufacturer. Not all airships were Zeppelins in much the same way as, despite what some would like to believe, all aircraft are not necessarily Boeings.

    • @guysmith1134
      @guysmith1134 3 роки тому +2

      and also he is mixing up blimps and dirigibles. Two different things.

    • @voornaam3191
      @voornaam3191 3 роки тому

      Yep, the Zeppelins all exploded and the airships kept on flying. Account managers turned down the very obvious helium option. Too expensive and it carries less weight than hydrogen. Exit airship. Airships never turned into the wonderful thing it could have been. A bit more expensive. A lot safer. What the F went wrong, here?

  • @mikepowell2776
    @mikepowell2776 3 роки тому +2

    Zeppelin LZ1 first flew in 1900, the last year of the 19th Cent (or first of the 20th depending on your persuasion). Then good oil’ Lindbergh C - 82nd person to cross the Atlantic by air.

  • @eastindiaV
    @eastindiaV 3 роки тому +1

    That yellow trainer plane used to fly above enemy camps and call in artillery barrages, they were actually used this way frequently in combat conditions.

  • @gonphercoughie897
    @gonphercoughie897 3 роки тому +2

    It seems their idea of vintage is anything before they made this video.........

  • @carbide1968
    @carbide1968 3 роки тому +2

    Lindbergh was about the 80th person to do that flight. So why did he get such recognition?

    • @cornbreadfedkirkpatrick9647
      @cornbreadfedkirkpatrick9647 3 роки тому

      Thank you well he was blond and blue eyed

    • @thephilster6860
      @thephilster6860 3 роки тому

      He flew solo, nonstop. That's pretty much it.

    • @grantrichards4950
      @grantrichards4950 3 роки тому +1

      He flew it alone. With no auto-pilot, he flew the plane for 36hrs, non-stop. Alcock & Brown get deserved credit for being the first. The others before Lindbergh were just duplicating what they did.

    • @michaelmckinnon7314
      @michaelmckinnon7314 2 роки тому

      Lindbergh was the first pilot to fly across the Atlantic from the US with Alcock and Brown being the first to fly across the Atlantic from Europe.

    • @richardcarnahan5184
      @richardcarnahan5184 2 роки тому

      @Michael McKinnon Actually, Alcock and Brown also flew east to west.

  • @malcolmbrown3532
    @malcolmbrown3532 3 роки тому +2

    What no Gossamer Albatross.....? The first successful pedal powered plane, that followed Louis Bleriot across the English Channel........

  • @sethkaicer319
    @sethkaicer319 3 роки тому +1

    Chris Kane showed Rocky Balboa the actual eye of the tiger.

    • @ChrisKane-
      @ChrisKane- 3 роки тому +2

      ...and then Chuck Norris snatched it out of the tiger. /nod

    • @sethkaicer319
      @sethkaicer319 3 роки тому +1

      @@ChrisKane- I heard he did it in one Deft move as well. It was almost like Jet Li taking apart Mel Gibson's weapon with one hand in Lethal Weapon 4.

  • @glenbirbeck4098
    @glenbirbeck4098 2 роки тому

    The 109 and P51 are also shape shifters it seems, able to look like one another for a few frames....

  • @njc1205
    @njc1205 3 роки тому

    The Rutan Voyager only began life with Lycoming O-235's. These engines were soon replaced by, and flown around the the world with a Continental O-240 as the front engine in a traditional tractor configuration, and Continental IOL-200 as the rear engine in a pusher configuration.

  • @Imnotyourdoormat
    @Imnotyourdoormat 2 роки тому +1

    St Louise?.........

  • @pyoung168
    @pyoung168 3 роки тому +1

    The Rutan Voyager did not have fixed pitch propellers. Both propellers were constant speed Produced by Hartzell.

    • @saveyourbacon6164
      @saveyourbacon6164 2 роки тому

      It can be seen in the video that the propellers look like constant-speed propellers, and it would be expected that these would be preferred to ensure fuel economy and range would be maximised.

  • @timcronin9654
    @timcronin9654 3 роки тому

    At 11:23 is a P51 Mustang. Not a Messerschmitt!

  • @williamhuff190
    @williamhuff190 Рік тому

    I believe the P-47 M and N models were faster than the BF109. They could excede 500 MPH. They were also fuel injected.

  • @Marco-dm3tc
    @Marco-dm3tc 2 роки тому

    Hey what’s simple history voice actor doing in this vid

  • @jimwells4240
    @jimwells4240 7 місяців тому

    One more nitpicky thing....the pressurization of the B-29 wasn't what allowed to fly long distances. The pressurization allowed it to fly for a long time at high altitude where there's way less drag....plus, it eliminated the necessity for the crew to stay on oxygen for flight segments over 10,000-12,000 feet.
    Oh....and becuase it was pressurized, it was a LOT warmer in the aircraft....no frostbite.

  • @voornaam3191
    @voornaam3191 3 роки тому

    And today it is built of composite materials and it does 9G for acceleration and Mach 5.0 within 3 seconds after take off?

  • @christopherbatty3837
    @christopherbatty3837 3 роки тому

    Bleriot - Anzani: engine routinely overheated to point of seuzure. ONLY REASON it maintained power for 36 min, was Bleriot flew through light rain storm part way across, lowering temperature rise to extent that subsequent temperature rise to failure point was not reached before landing.

  • @RWBHere
    @RWBHere 6 місяців тому

    Zeppelin's were only built by Zeppelin. No other dirigibles carried that name.

  • @johnnymiller8938
    @johnnymiller8938 3 роки тому +4

    The Zeppelin is not a plane.

    • @trooperdgb9722
      @trooperdgb9722 3 роки тому

      The video itself says "Aircraft" so thats OK...its just the UA-cam title that says Planes...

  • @cornbreadfedkirkpatrick9647
    @cornbreadfedkirkpatrick9647 3 роки тому

    But they'd surprised the blackbird but it outran them, whew the pilot said huh oh I was just in international space, can you prove it was me :D

  • @malcolmeunson5543
    @malcolmeunson5543 3 роки тому

    No helicopter, but blimps…? No Mosquito…? One can argue these over at least a couple of yr choice….🤔

  • @mikecavell8283
    @mikecavell8283 2 роки тому

    Ram jet, really!

  • @powellmountainmike8853
    @powellmountainmike8853 3 роки тому

    You have confused Zeppelins which are RIGID lighter than air craft, with BLIMPS, which are NON-RIGID lighter than air craft. Zeppelins have an internal framework covered by an outer fabric skin, and the lifting gas is contained within large gas bags within that framework. The gas does NOT inflate the outer skin. A blimp is essentially a balloon with steering fins and motors and the whole skin is inflated by the gas within it. They are two very different things. If you wish to talk about the class as a whole you should refer to them as "navigable lighter than air craft," or "airships."

  • @bitsyletrois-roues5710
    @bitsyletrois-roues5710 3 роки тому

    I met Frank Whittle once, along time ago. And what about concorde, and the vulcan bomber ? Also the first reports of breaking the sound barrier were during ww2 by spitfire pilots, although they didn't know it :-)

  • @OlderThanMost.1955
    @OlderThanMost.1955 Рік тому

    Superr

  • @liquidlemon3335
    @liquidlemon3335 2 роки тому +1

    So the sr 71 wasnt the fastest aircraft in the world its the x 15

  • @patrickgriffitt6551
    @patrickgriffitt6551 2 місяці тому

    St.Louis. no E on the end.

  • @Mr.XJ.96
    @Mr.XJ.96 3 роки тому +1

    Wait......No B-17 No P-38 No F4U No P-47 No Lancaster No Spitfire No B-36. Imo anyone of these would be more iconic and should be on a top ten list. Two of the BEST and well know allied Bombers. The LARGEST Bomber ever produced Six Turnin Four Burin. The Forked tailed devil one of IF not the most iconic designs of all the WWII fighters. Whistling Death or the Bent Winged Bastard....ANOTHER recognizable iconic arguably the most iconic designs of WWII. Thunderbolt or The Jug nick named Jug not because its a Juggernaut BUT because the Fuselage resembles a Milk Jug. Gabby Gabreski the P-47 Ace of WW2 and Korea. The Jug had the most kills of any WWII fighter. The Seversky Wing the Famous film Thunderbolt its A FLYING TANK lol. The Lancaster......Four Merlins Dam Buster Night Bomber Again a Very iconic Design that is Unmistakable...The Number One one the list should be a Spitfire!!! One of if NOT the very BEST and most Elegant Fighters and Aircraft to EVER to fly the Blue Sky.

  • @altonkenne579
    @altonkenne579 3 роки тому

    Taylorcraft ? Red barons triwing ? Cessna 150 ? Bonanza v. Tail ? Tripacer ? Jenny ? Aronica ? Many more that need praise .pitts special baby great lakes ! Pawnee spray plane ! Ford tri motor . F8f bearcat huey h1. Bell ranger srearman. Etc.!!!!!

  • @williamjames9515
    @williamjames9515 3 роки тому +2

    The Focke Wolf was superior to the Mescherschmidt. Both lost to the Spitfires and Hurricanes of the Brits.

    • @esajuhanirintamaki965
      @esajuhanirintamaki965 8 місяців тому

      Which Focke-Wulf you mean? Biplane trainer FW 44 "Stieglitz"...? FW 200 Condor, perhaps?

  • @michaelnorris4629
    @michaelnorris4629 3 роки тому

    It’s a blimp, not a zap

  • @AzTrailRider57
    @AzTrailRider57 3 роки тому

    5:17 Ya learn something everyday. I didn't realize that pressurizing a cabin gives a plane more range.???? Whodathunk?

    • @james.lambert
      @james.lambert 3 місяці тому

      I feel like they left off an important detail that doing so allowed them to fly at a higher altitude which is more efficient

  • @vinnyaraujo2911
    @vinnyaraujo2911 3 роки тому

    Do you mess up the big words whenever your recording your video?

  • @blondbowler8776
    @blondbowler8776 3 роки тому +2

    My father flew blimps in WWII, not zeppelins. How much other questionable drivel is in this video?

  • @650gringo
    @650gringo 8 місяців тому

    Kill the music. Almost impossible to hear the narration.

  • @matthewschauenburg
    @matthewschauenburg 6 місяців тому

    jack daniels????

  • @JDevPeabody
    @JDevPeabody 3 роки тому +2

    Get your facts and names correct.

  • @stevelangstroth5833
    @stevelangstroth5833 Рік тому

    So,........ where are Glenn Curtiss's airplanes? Did I miss them? If so, what time mark, please? If they're not in the video, then the video sucks.

  • @michel-dw3vx
    @michel-dw3vx 3 роки тому +2

    You missed the BF-190 -

    • @darkiee69
      @darkiee69 3 роки тому +3

      You mean the FW 190?

  • @Chompchompyerded
    @Chompchompyerded Рік тому

    Zeppelins are not the same thing as blimps. Kind of messed up information here.

  • @gocanada9749
    @gocanada9749 2 роки тому

    WRONG ABOUT the WRIGHT BROS .... ALBERTO SANTOS DUMONT of Brasil flew before them

    • @mikearmstrong8483
      @mikearmstrong8483 9 місяців тому

      WRONG ABOUT YOUR GULLIBLE BELIEF IN FALSE PROPAGANDA. Now go learn how to do actual research so you don't make such a fool of yourself online.

  • @briancopeland8459
    @briancopeland8459 Рік тому

    Why are there no UK planes shown, such as the various heavy bombers, Lancaster, and the Mosquito? This is such a mistake, as the Mossie was the fastest planes built. Not fair, too one-sided!

  • @imanuelahmar2670
    @imanuelahmar2670 3 роки тому

    👍

  • @christopherbatty3837
    @christopherbatty3837 3 роки тому

    Red Square C172 - no he didn't! It is not possible to land inside the square - no obstacle - clear approach is possible.
    He landed OUTSIDE on a sloping open paved area on THE OTHER SIDE of St Basils which features in background.
    Not difficult to execute - clear easy, over-river approach and decelerating up - slope on landing.
    Well executed....skill ? good luck ? A combination of both ? ✈

  • @rxrzrxrz
    @rxrzrxrz Рік тому

    "Heinous action of dropping the Atomic bomd......." The most cowardice act the earth has ever witnessed.......

  • @donaldparlettjr3295
    @donaldparlettjr3295 3 роки тому

    The Me109 used for the speed record was not a production 109 but a special plane made and called the Me109Z. It was tweaked in many ways that it wasn't a true 109 but the Nazi regime it was a propaganda ploy to make the 109 look really good.

    • @johnbockelie3899
      @johnbockelie3899 3 роки тому

      Douglas DC 3, 1936- ????.
      Best plane ever.

    • @donaldparlettjr3295
      @donaldparlettjr3295 3 роки тому

      John Bockelie to infinity knowing that old girl. Hell it will probably fly against the Millenium Falcon.

  • @exJacktar
    @exJacktar 3 роки тому +2

    Jesus, do some research ffs. This video is full of many mistakes.

  • @jimdeboer84
    @jimdeboer84 3 роки тому

    This video needed to be edited by someone who knows at least a little about airplanes and their history. It is riddled with somewhat true facts. For example, the X-1 was not dropped from the bomb bay of a B29, it was slung under the bomber. This is just one example. And a Zeppelin and a blimp are two different things and evidently a bf109 can turn itself into Spitfire and then into a P-51 and then back again according to the video footage. What airplane was actually the first to circumnavigate the globe? This video has me confused about that. Basically, some parts contradict other parts. As they say, the devil is in the details.

  • @jamesrose1460
    @jamesrose1460 3 роки тому +5

    I believe your speed record for the ME-109 is false. The record breaking aircraft was not an ME-109....but the propagandists had the name changed to ME-109R...suggesting all ME-109s were such speed demons...when the main line fighters were out performed by the P-51, P-47, FW-190, and a few others. Need to do a little more research on your videos

    • @jonathanbaincosmologyvideo3868
      @jonathanbaincosmologyvideo3868 3 роки тому

      in fairness he said piston engine, p47 and fw190 are radial engines, but p51 was a faster piston engine

    • @njc1205
      @njc1205 3 роки тому

      @@jonathanbaincosmologyvideo3868 Radial engines have pistons. Perhaps your confusion lies with rotary engines which despite also starting with an "R", do not have pistons.

    • @jonathanbaincosmologyvideo3868
      @jonathanbaincosmologyvideo3868 3 роки тому

      @@njc1205 you just got it so wrong - lol

  • @bearcat0
    @bearcat0 3 роки тому

    Weenur

  • @Noob785_
    @Noob785_ 3 роки тому

    First

  • @JoaoOliveira-mi6qs
    @JoaoOliveira-mi6qs 2 місяці тому

    I forgot to say - > ua-cam.com/video/TxTx3jWpbaA/v-deo.html and ua-cam.com/video/5qKhY29Vhr4/v-deo.html

  • @Bianchiboy
    @Bianchiboy 3 роки тому +6

    Instantly goes wrong with the ‘Spirit Of St. Louise’ …. What a joke of a channel.

  • @GoogleToobUser
    @GoogleToobUser 2 роки тому

    I want to watch your videos... I just find it difficult to do when the first thing, about one of the most historic aircraft in the world, is misspelled. The credibility of the rest of the video comes under significant scrutiny and really sucks the fun of watching it out- for me. I do not expect you to respond to this message. I know you are just trying to earn money through re-publishing these vintage movies. I just wish you would present the information in a credible manner.