Thanks for using the same new bar-chain on each saw. I've been a loud critic of the new saw, but I'm starting to wonder *IF* the new saw could be better than I thought at first. We'll see.
Went from a 462 to the 400c .Both brilliant saws ,no question.. it is sad to see the 400c discontinued in it's present form . I can see the new version does indeed have an advantage with torque improved and less weight is a no brainer. I will be able to take full advantage of both. I will see what the price is at my local shop when they are in stock
The 400.1 looks good , 300g lighter than the original too . Speaking with an actual arborist recently , he said he prefers the 400 over the 500i because when running a saw all day the weight difference left him less fatigued at the end of the day , the new saw would make an even greater difference.
G'day Gordon, That's nearly 1kg lighter than the 500i I can appreciate that as I'm not getting any younger. That's why I love my 400 if I need more I use my 660 which beats the 500 in big wood or as you know the hardest wood, If I need more it's the 880, Merry Christmas and all the best in the West 👍.
@@ishure8849 G'day Ish , appreciate the reply , yeah mate I'm looking at turning 70 in a few short weeks myself , it doesn't get any easier as time marches on , that's for sure. Wish I'd taken better care earlier etc . All the best for yourself and those who matter to you , will see you around the traps on these channels next year , a sharp chain is an indication of a sharp mind . ( I just made that up , lol ) Merry Christmas Ish , have a good one 🖖cheers
I've found that there's just about nothing you can do with a 500i that you can't do more comfortably with a 400. And if you really, really need the 500i because the 400 isn't powerful enough - you probably need a 661.
The 400c is choked back so much from the factory that it's ridiculous. I thought the 400c was a junk saw in stock form.... once ported, the 400c is nasty light saw. I'd like to see what the 400.1 will do, once ported. I'll probably buy one when they become available and machine/port it. 😂
A great and fair comparison. The performance of the new 400.1 is very impressive. Looking forward to the comparison to the 362. I have a 361 and it’s a great saw.
I agree 1000%. The old 400c is not running at its peak performance. My 400c would blow away that older 400c. It needs an adjustment for sure. Unfair test to sell the new 400.1c.
@Forestry_ANNA_2024 no I've been running the old 400c for about 4 years. Was extremely unhappy with it until I had between 10 and 20 tanks throught it. Then after regular mtronic resets which take a minute or two to perform it just got better and better. I found that a mtronic reset with changes in ambient temperature makes a massive difference. Lately if done a west coast bark box and airfilter with a few other mods and it's a absolute weapon. Certainly performs nothing like the old 400c in this video. I'm not doubting the performance of the new one, it looks like a good saw.
Super Test!Die neue Ms 400 ist Top!Interessant wäre Stihl Ms 400 gegen Husqvarna 562 Mark 2.Mit der selben Schiene und Kette.Mit Adapter geht die Stihlschiene auf die Husqvarna 562
Very nice saw. The „old“ 400 is great and pretty solid. The new one should also be impressive but as I said I will wait a year or two before I buy one to see how well it would perform at a long distance. Or I might get one and see it myself 😁
Nearly bought the 400 six months ago but when i got to the dealers the 500 was on special, $500 off, for the same price as the 400 so now I have 2 500s. I wonder when this gets to Australia. The torque upgrade is perfect for our hardwoods. I guess i need to start saving for another toy.
Ive run the original MS 400 and it is a beast. I said if I ever buy another saw it would be that. But im not interested anymore since they brought down the power. I'll keep running my 044 and MS 261cm
I have the Ms 500i and it beats all the other sthil models that I owned . Can’t wait to see the new sthil Ms 400.1 here in Pacific Northwest United States . I used to have the old sthil Ms 400c !
I do think stock vs stock that the new may be the way to go. I have a feeling that port vs port will be different and i am sure many porters out there make videos on this. We shall see. I just had my 400 ported and it is like a different saw. Very fun to run a 25 bar on now.
Is the MS363 the standard carburetor version of this saw? I saw a Brazilian UA-cam video that looks like the same unit but with old school carburetor adjustments. 👍
Great video, I am really impressed by the new 400.1. I am about to equip myself and I wanted to get a MS500i, so I am looking forward to your comparison between the 400.1 and the 500i
Your review answers some questions but leaves the issue of longevity/robustness unanswered. Can you put it in the hands of a tree service/ forestry worker for two months and get them to report back to you. Then serious customers for this saw might be convinced. But maybe Stihl would not let you do that?
They’re already in testing how do you think these guys got one? Stihls probably had this new one running over a year with select loggers and other professionals getting feedback and looking for issues
Looking forward to the latest 400 going up against the 500i. Take note oh loggers across the pond, the correct starting procedure for a chainsaw. None of that yo-yo drop start malarkey 😅
I am curious to see what the price will be. I can’t see it being the same price as the old one. Don’t know how many they would sell at 1k+ when the Husqvarna 562xp Mark II and Echo 620p is several hundred below 1k.
It won’t be as expensive as the last 400, by lowering the cc to the same roughly as everyone else’s 60cc class saw it needs to be closer to a 362 price and I’m sure they lost the expensive mag piston to help lower the price.
The original doesn’t sound to be running quite right. Sounds too boggy. I think a good carb reset would do it some good. Good video regardless mate. Cheers
Well that sure will give the sceptics something to think about! Especially because the new saw isn’t as broken in as old version so it has a slight disadvantage there. The new 400 definitely proved itself as a powerhouse in the 60cc class! 562 mk2 vs 400.1 would be a good shootout as well. I heard in Oliver’s video I think that they will have a heated version as well unlike the original 400. They better since cancelling the 362 had an Arctic version.
Very nice comparison! I think a shorter bar would be better for hardwood. I will get the saw with an 18" bar. Best regards from Germany! ✌ Sehr schöner Vergleich! Ich denke für Hartholz wäre eine kürzere Schiene besser. Ich werde mir die Säge mit einer 18" Schiene holen. Viele Grüße aus Deutschland ✌
I much more prefere on MS500i over MS400C. Why? When I have calculated how much fuel per m³ spent MS400C and how much MS500i I found out that MS500i spent much less fuel. So I decide to sold MS400C. Now I am again looking to buy new MS400C to see how it will working. But I am little sceptic because they turned on acceleration and max RPM and on Husqvarna we know where they got problems and now they make few steps back.
Pretty interesting that lesser cc and lesser power in that new 400.1 outcuts original 400, now that means that this is very universal and relatively light but has some torque. Will be interesting to pit against a MS462, might be that saw starts to go obsolete when a much lighter saw can cut almost as fast as 70cc saw. Interesting times. Husqy 550mk2 goes bust because it weighs only couple hundred grams less but is way less cc and power. Medium Husqvarnas have to go dieting now😂
ya gotta use a 400 like you ride a 125cc 2-stroke dirtbike! I'm too old to race motocross to I replaced dirtbikes with more pro stihl saws than any home owner has a right to own
Strange, it just beat a 592 10 days ago. But what do I know, I just square grind and use a 28” for reach and been a professional faller since the late 80’s. Tell me more master! lol
@@olivierlevasseur5909 both warmed the same. No false info here. We don’t leave raw footage in of warming up and fannying about as people only skip and the video drags. All our videos are cut and edited like this 👍🏼 hope that clears it up.
The closest things I could think to cheat this would have been: 1) on the hard wood, the 400 cut the harder dry checked end before the 400.1 made its cut 2) a dirty air filter on the 400 and a clean one on the 400.1 3) different fuel in each saw? *BUT* I doubt there's any intentional cheating here. So let's accept it... First in the real world, these saws are running closer than I thought they would. Even though I run a Bark Box to help the original 400 breath better for added torque, I also understand we're comparing factory spec saws. Lastly, an argument could be made that the 400 is "broken in" and performing at its best, where the 400.1 is not there yet. Bottom line, I love the original 400 and it's still a great saw. It's because of that, I'm having a hard time being objective here. If we want better saws, we need to be objective. We'll see what customers say.
in my opinion there is a lot of difference, it seems almost impossible to me that there is so much difference. Even a 67 cc against a 62 cc that goes less....
come on the old 400 had not got a new bar on it we can see the paint off the bottom and tip of the bar on the first cut hence you didnt start it then cut the wood the film was stiopped and next image it was in the wood
@@MachineryNation His point is that you claimed to have put "brand new chains and brand new bars on each saw to make it as fair as possible". But at 00:06 we see the bar on the 400c is worn with paint off the bottom as he said. Definitely not a brand new bar. So possibly not a brand new chain either.
@ they were both brand new bars and chains. Prior to this tea they had never been used. Sorry to hear you are such sceptics, it must be hard for you to sleep at night not being able to trust anything.
@@dab. thank you glad im not just the only one who could see it but they dont like it when you bring things up about stuff yet say what you think in the coments that origianl 400 was running poor just to make the 400i look good hence stihl let them have it to boost new sales so had to make it look good
@@MachineryNation look at the bar at 2.32 you can clearly see the paint worn off the bottom and tip of it, and fdunny im not the only one whos said about it. we know you had to make the 400i look better or sihl wouldnt never let you have one, the old 400 if set up correctly thats been used and run it would beat the new one with hardly any run time on it
Bold statement but fair enough. As good as the Echo 600S it’s not got anything on these, the new 400.1 is 1.3kw more and weighs nearly 1kg less than the Echo 600. From Stock I would say it pulls way better than the 600S.
@@MachineryNation that's probably true. But I can lean on it. I like the torque of that saw. It runs with a 27 on it and buried in red oak, it just eats. I also have a ported 600 and that's by far better. I'd compare it to a stock 500i on power. So for the price of the 600 and the port work is still better overall that the stihl imo.
I really like my 400, but the new one looks good too! Stihl makes great saws. At 4:52 minute mark, why are you prying it like that? Wouldn't it cut faster and be better for the saw components to use consistent pressure and allow the rpm's to stay high?
Thanks for using the same new bar-chain on each saw. I've been a loud critic of the new saw, but I'm starting to wonder *IF* the new saw could be better than I thought at first. We'll see.
Thanks so much mate. Really appreciate this comment, your honesty is very welcome here.
Was super skeptical about the new 400, but this video represented both saws well and has left me impressed with the new 400.
Thank you Angus 👍🏼
Great video I would like you to put it up against a Husqvarna 562 MKII. The new MS 400.1 looks impressive and I am after a new 60cc saw.
Thanks mate, yes would be great to see it against the 562 mk2
@@MachineryNation against 500i would be great too
Went from a 462 to the 400c .Both brilliant saws ,no question.. it is sad to see the 400c discontinued in it's present form . I can see the new version does indeed have an advantage with torque improved and less weight is a no brainer.
I will be able to take full advantage of both. I will see what the price is at my local shop when they are in stock
I'll be sticking with the original 400
The 400.1 looks good , 300g lighter than the original too . Speaking with an actual arborist recently , he said he prefers the 400 over the 500i because when running a saw all day the weight difference left him less fatigued at the end of the day , the new saw would make an even greater difference.
G'day Gordon, That's nearly 1kg lighter than the 500i I can appreciate that as I'm not getting any younger. That's why I love my 400 if I need more I use my 660 which beats the 500 in big wood or as you know the hardest wood, If I need more it's the 880, Merry Christmas and all the best in the West 👍.
@@ishure8849 G'day Ish , appreciate the reply , yeah mate I'm looking at turning 70 in a few short weeks myself , it doesn't get any easier as time marches on , that's for sure. Wish I'd taken better care earlier etc .
All the best for yourself and those who matter to you , will see you around the traps on these channels next year , a sharp chain is an indication of a sharp mind . ( I just made that up , lol ) Merry Christmas Ish , have a good one 🖖cheers
@@Gordon_L And to you, nowhere more important than in our woods the leading edge.
I've found that there's just about nothing you can do with a 500i that you can't do more comfortably with a 400. And if you really, really need the 500i because the 400 isn't powerful enough - you probably need a 661.
The 400c is choked back so much from the factory that it's ridiculous. I thought the 400c was a junk saw in stock form.... once ported, the 400c is nasty light saw.
I'd like to see what the 400.1 will do, once ported.
I'll probably buy one when they become available and machine/port it. 😂
I want the new ms400 that saw is awesome
Now after this video that new 400.1 piques my interest.
A great and fair comparison. The performance of the new 400.1 is very impressive. Looking forward to the comparison to the 362. I have a 361 and it’s a great saw.
I think the old ms400 needs the m tronic resetting. It seemed very boggy.
I agree 1000%. The old 400c is not running at its peak performance. My 400c would blow away that older 400c. It needs an adjustment for sure. Unfair test to sell the new 400.1c.
You're right. I've never seen the old 400 bog down that much. It definitely needs an M-Tronic reset.
Have you bought this yet and know it so well?
@@cromwellforestry2662 good thinking mine runs much better with rest at least beginning of cutting season for me
@Forestry_ANNA_2024 no I've been running the old 400c for about 4 years. Was extremely unhappy with it until I had between 10 and 20 tanks throught it. Then after regular mtronic resets which take a minute or two to perform it just got better and better. I found that a mtronic reset with changes in ambient temperature makes a massive difference. Lately if done a west coast bark box and airfilter with a few other mods and it's a absolute weapon. Certainly performs nothing like the old 400c in this video. I'm not doubting the performance of the new one, it looks like a good saw.
Nice test 👍 Allways fun to watch 🙂
I'll be getting one! Main complaint on my 400 is it lacks torque. Lighter and more torque will be nice!
Merry Christmas to you, Josh and magic Mike!🎅🎄
Super Test!Die neue Ms 400 ist Top!Interessant wäre Stihl Ms 400 gegen Husqvarna 562 Mark 2.Mit der selben Schiene und Kette.Mit Adapter geht die Stihlschiene auf die Husqvarna 562
Hey, quick question. Can you guys run the new 400 vs the 462 from Stihl? Would be far more interesting for me than vs the 500I
Now I want the new one! Good job!
Very impressive, I use a 400CM for the last 3 years and it's a fantastic saw so it's great to see the new saw in realtime action
Merry Christmas
Very nice saw. The „old“ 400 is great and pretty solid. The new one should also be impressive but as I said I will wait a year or two before I buy one to see how well it would perform at a long distance. Or I might get one and see it myself 😁
Can’t really get a better comparison then that good job
Thanks mate, really appreciate it 👍🏼
Nearly bought the 400 six months ago but when i got to the dealers the 500 was on special, $500 off, for the same price as the 400 so now I have 2 500s.
I wonder when this gets to Australia. The torque upgrade is perfect for our hardwoods. I guess i need to start saving for another toy.
Whaaaaat?! 500 bucks off the 500i? What a deal!
I'm eager for Stihl's update of the 462!
Ive run the original MS 400 and it is a beast. I said if I ever buy another saw it would be that. But im not interested anymore since they brought down the power. I'll keep running my 044 and MS 261cm
I have the Ms 500i and it beats all the other sthil models that I owned . Can’t wait to see the new sthil Ms 400.1 here in Pacific Northwest United States . I used to have the old sthil Ms 400c !
When will this be available in the United States?
eBay
2025
Late 2025 is the rumor I have heard so far.
What length bar?
20”
I do think stock vs stock that the new may be the way to go. I have a feeling that port vs port will be different and i am sure many porters out there make videos on this. We shall see. I just had my 400 ported and it is like a different saw. Very fun to run a 25 bar on now.
Is the MS363 the standard carburetor version of this saw? I saw a Brazilian UA-cam video that looks like the same unit but with old school carburetor adjustments. 👍
One of the best features with this new ms400 is that it comes with heated handles 👍
Great video, I am really impressed by the new 400.1. I am about to equip myself and I wanted to get a MS500i, so I am looking forward to your comparison between the 400.1 and the 500i
Your review answers some questions but leaves the issue of longevity/robustness unanswered. Can you put it in the hands of a tree service/ forestry worker for two months and get them to report back to you. Then serious customers for this saw might be convinced. But maybe Stihl would not let you do that?
They’re already in testing how do you think these guys got one? Stihls probably had this new one running over a year with select loggers and other professionals getting feedback and looking for issues
Looks like a nice saw but also looks like you are trying to sell everyone on the new model
I hope the new lighter weight frame of the 400i holds up and does not crack.
It's not going to. All the lighter framed saws have cracked. They aren't nearly as durable as the ones before them.
I will add the new 400 to my collection the new design is great and it seems to be off great quality
Hi James + Josh or Ballast, Great review on the old and new Stihl petrol chain saws, as always great to watch take care
Good morning from Wales! 💪👊
Evening James has the new 400.1 still got a plastic front handle? Cheers Ian 👍
It definitely looks to be plastic still. Arctic Option should have a metal handle.
I hope it's plastic, in every way better than metal
Looking forward to the latest 400 going up against the 500i.
Take note oh loggers across the pond, the correct starting procedure for a chainsaw. None of that yo-yo drop start malarkey 😅
I am curious to see what the price will be. I can’t see it being the same price as the old one. Don’t know how many they would sell at 1k+ when the Husqvarna 562xp Mark II and Echo 620p is several hundred below 1k.
It won’t be as expensive as the last 400, by lowering the cc to the same roughly as everyone else’s 60cc class saw it needs to be closer to a 362 price and I’m sure they lost the expensive mag piston to help lower the price.
The original doesn’t sound to be running quite right. Sounds too boggy. I think a good carb reset would do it some good. Good video regardless mate. Cheers
I would like to see a comparison of both saws ported.
Yeah that would be interesting. Not our wheelhouse, but I’m sure someone out there will give it a go.
Well that sure will give the sceptics something to think about! Especially because the new saw isn’t as broken in as old version so it has a slight disadvantage there. The new 400 definitely proved itself as a powerhouse in the 60cc class!
562 mk2 vs 400.1 would be a good shootout as well.
I heard in Oliver’s video I think that they will have a heated version as well unlike the original 400. They better since cancelling the 362 had an Arctic version.
Oh yes boys this is what we've been waiting for!!
Very nice comparison! I think a shorter bar would be better for hardwood. I will get the saw with an 18" bar. Best regards from Germany! ✌
Sehr schöner Vergleich! Ich denke für Hartholz wäre eine kürzere Schiene besser. Ich werde mir die Säge mit einer 18" Schiene holen. Viele Grüße aus Deutschland ✌
Ahh the Germans, absolutely marvelous people, 👍😁💪🪓🌲🇩🇪🇮🇪
@Toyotaamazon80series 🤜🤛
i gotta vote for the 67cc saw. maybe because I own one?? lol due to the weight 12.5 - 12.8 I would have axed the the 362 and just kept the 67cc 400.
what about it against the ms 462 ..
Hi James & team Nice one looks a good saw Thanks again
Hope Stihl keeps this saw at a good price point that the average guy can afford
I’m betting it will be somewhere between the old two in price since it needs to be competitive with a 60cc saw
Wow didnt expect the old saw to look so weak. Really underlines the power vs torque figures!
Very impressive saw.
I much more prefere on MS500i over MS400C. Why? When I have calculated how much fuel per m³ spent MS400C and how much MS500i I found out that MS500i spent much less fuel. So I decide to sold MS400C. Now I am again looking to buy new MS400C to see how it will working. But I am little sceptic because they turned on acceleration and max RPM and on Husqvarna we know where they got problems and now they make few steps back.
Pretty interesting that lesser cc and lesser power in that new 400.1 outcuts original 400, now that means that this is very universal and relatively light but has some torque. Will be interesting to pit against a MS462, might be that saw starts to go obsolete when a much lighter saw can cut almost as fast as 70cc saw. Interesting times.
Husqy 550mk2 goes bust because it weighs only couple hundred grams less but is way less cc and power. Medium Husqvarnas have to go dieting now😂
Which machine do you think is the best?
ya gotta use a 400 like you ride a 125cc 2-stroke dirtbike! I'm too old to race motocross to I replaced dirtbikes with more pro stihl saws than any home owner has a right to own
Put the new one against 462. That be interesting to see how they compare…
Strange, I don’t have any issues keeping my old 034 super in the power band and it’s had a 28” on it for 35 years 🤷🏽♂️
And been slow the whole time 28” is a lot for a 60cc saw. 036 is a dog with a 28” bar non ported.
Strange, it just beat a 592 10 days ago. But what do I know, I just square grind and use a 28” for reach and been a professional faller since the late 80’s. Tell me more master! lol
is the new ms400 any better in fuel cost
No, the fuel costs the same for both saws
Old 400 cold start, new 400.1 warm...? Some video frames was cutting off before thé old saw toucher the wood.
@@olivierlevasseur5909 both warmed the same. No false info here. We don’t leave raw footage in of warming up and fannying about as people only skip and the video drags. All our videos are cut and edited like this 👍🏼 hope that clears it up.
The closest things I could think to cheat this would have been:
1) on the hard wood, the 400 cut the harder dry checked end before the 400.1 made its cut
2) a dirty air filter on the 400 and a clean one on the 400.1
3) different fuel in each saw?
*BUT* I doubt there's any intentional cheating here. So let's accept it...
First in the real world, these saws are running closer than I thought they would. Even though I run a Bark Box to help the original 400 breath better for added torque, I also understand we're comparing factory spec saws.
Lastly, an argument could be made that the 400 is "broken in" and performing at its best, where the 400.1 is not there yet.
Bottom line, I love the original 400 and it's still a great saw. It's because of that, I'm having a hard time being objective here. If we want better saws, we need to be objective. We'll see what customers say.
400.1 vs 562xp mkii im looking forward to see on this canal
compare to the 500i and the 576 would be great
Damm now i want one to go with my 6month old 400
Not with 500i , Make versus MS 462 please ❤
Die neue Säge ist einfach nur eine Macht Demonstration einfach krsss
Let's see the husquvarna equivalent go up against it and look forward to seeing the 500i
If you would of kept the old 400 in power band it would of been a different story. New looks good though. Oh 362 is a dog!
nice vid well done
Thanks Chris.
And the MS363... Is it... a simplified version of the MS400?! Is it just marketing?
Completely different model, different motor, carburetor.
M-Tronic vs. carburetor with screws.
From what I’ve seen the 363 is exactly the same minus having an adjustable carburetor.
die alte Säge gefällt mir besser
I think he was throwing the competition. Not that much of a difference between the two.
in my opinion there is a lot of difference, it seems almost impossible to me that there is so much difference. Even a 67 cc against a 62 cc that goes less....
Wish i needed one! 😂
When does it go on sale, all I hear is 2025……is that January 2025 or December 2025???
come on the old 400 had not got a new bar on it we can see the paint off the bottom and tip of the bar on the first cut hence you didnt start it then cut the wood the film was stiopped and next image it was in the wood
🤦🏻♂️ can you hear yourself? Please tell me why would we lie?
@@MachineryNation His point is that you claimed to have put "brand new chains and brand new bars on each saw to make it as fair as possible".
But at 00:06 we see the bar on the 400c is worn with paint off the bottom as he said. Definitely not a brand new bar. So possibly not a brand new chain either.
@ they were both brand new bars and chains. Prior to this tea they had never been used. Sorry to hear you are such sceptics, it must be hard for you to sleep at night not being able to trust anything.
@@dab. thank you glad im not just the only one who could see it but they dont like it when you bring things up about stuff yet say what you think in the coments that origianl 400 was running poor just to make the 400i look good hence stihl let them have it to boost new sales so had to make it look good
@@MachineryNation look at the bar at 2.32 you can clearly see the paint worn off the bottom and tip of it, and fdunny im not the only one whos said about it. we know you had to make the 400i look better or sihl wouldnt never let you have one, the old 400 if set up correctly thats been used and run it would beat the new one with hardly any run time on it
Skills on a chainsaw are lacking.
I kept getting irritated by hitting the brake every time cut was done!
Shit I would take my echo 600 over both of these. They seem gutless for the damn price.
Bold statement but fair enough. As good as the Echo 600S it’s not got anything on these, the new 400.1 is 1.3kw more and weighs nearly 1kg less than the Echo 600. From Stock I would say it pulls way better than the 600S.
😂😂😂🤦♂️
@@MachineryNation that's probably true. But I can lean on it. I like the torque of that saw. It runs with a 27 on it and buried in red oak, it just eats. I also have a ported 600 and that's by far better. I'd compare it to a stock 500i on power. So for the price of the 600 and the port work is still better overall that the stihl imo.
I really like my 400, but the new one looks good too! Stihl makes great saws. At 4:52 minute mark, why are you prying it like that? Wouldn't it cut faster and be better for the saw components to use consistent pressure and allow the rpm's to stay high?
Get your 400 while you can... despite what this 12 min. Advert says
Would love to know why, just sceptical or know something we have missed? Generally interested 👍🏼
it stings a bit when you buy a 400 but you smile everyday after the $1200 with a light 24-25 bar
too overpriced both
I thought the old one would be faster
We did to and were as surprised 👍🏼
@ i have the older one. I like it but it does leave a little to be desired in the torque department so it’s nice to see they improved.