⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ Chapters 📖🔖: 1:26 1949 Chinese Revolution 3:27 Mao visits Soviet Union 1949 6:18 Soviet-China Mutual Defence Treaty 7:47 Land Reform Movement 8:28 Korean War 1950 12:07 Khruschev's reign & Stalin's ⚰️ 12:41 First Taiwan Strait Crisis 1954-55; Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty; 7th Fleet in SCS 16:08 Khruschev's Secret speech 🗣️ @ Soviet Communist Party's 20th Congress 17:29 Hungary🇭🇺 Revolution 1956 17:48 Sino-Soviet split: struggle of communist despots for pre-eminence 24:08 Great Leap Forward 27:49 🇷🇺-🇺🇸-🇬🇧 Partial Test Ban Treaty; PRC nuclear tests 29:22 Vietnam War; Chinese anti-Americanism 30:37 Great Cultural Revolution 34:17 Sino-Soviet border conflict 1969 38:22 Ping-pong 🏓 diplomacy (Neo-functionalism) 43:03 Nixon's visit to China 1972
11/10 interviews in this docu series. Not to make it too precious, but it’s like a time capsule. From everyday citizens to leaders and government officials, to Fidel Castro and Hugh Hefner.
+Paul singh-sangha Yes, I thought this was worth a wry smile too. I'm not sure it's strictly Capitalistic per sé, but it's certainly outside the spirit of Communism. For Soviet Russia, this is not big surprise :3
I noticed from the older recordings the speakers tended to have higher pitched voice. I wonder if this was caused by how the microphones were produced at the times.
Laughing about the translations of "old boot" and "old galosh"! Thanks for the heads up about what NOT TO call the Chinese old folks in my neighborhood! :-) (PS...they are wonderful people and neighbors whom I respect very much, I call them "Grandpa" and "Auntie" in Chinese, they don't know a lot of English.)
He kept being vulgar even later. When Nixon and Kissinger first came to visit China, Mao commented that they "dressed up for the meeting like some prostitutes". But I have an impression that this kind of language was usual for Mao. :)
The US needed a place to industrialise and compete with Europe after they recovered from WW2. The US Backed the Nationalists, Who stole all of China's treasury and ran to Taiwan. Opium Drug lord who then shot the Taiwanese.
You seem to forget there were 2 sides in the Chinese Civil War, the Communists and The Nationalists, they had been fighting each other since the 20s but put thier differences aside to deal with the Japanese invasion of China during WW2, but within months of WW2 ending they were fighting each other again, in the end the Communists had the hearts and minds of a lot of the Chinese population, the Nationalists had maintained control via warlord governor's for years and they often treated the average Chinese person like slaves so the bulk of the population were open to communist subversion/ indoctrination
The US always interferes in other countries forgetting difference in culture and history hence fucking up all these countries this will lead to it's ultimate downfall
They meant 500k chi com soldiers from the pla were involved in the first wave of chineese intervention . There were over a million involved and probably half of them were to become casualties
@Pedro Ortega And perhaps most infuriating of all is his supreme arrogance and presumed right to rule was only matched by his total incompetence and shameless truth-spinning. Stalin at least did something for the Soviet economy. Mao left China as the same agrarian shithole he found it in, he had just destroyed their history/culture and literally liquified their brains.
45:35 These particular individuals are *ideologically* responsible for crimes against humanity during the Vietnam War, the result of applying Merchant-class accounting principles to matters of warfare. They measured military success in terms of the number of enemy killed, to achieve victory within a certain timeframe, and minimise the resources consumed. This was *supposed* to avoid the repercussions of a long drawn-out conflict, and thereby secure their own political futures. But as with *any ideology that is fundamentally corrupt the end result is always the extreme opposite of that intended* - millions of civilian deaths, a long drawn-out conflict, and then ultimately losing that war. As outlined in this scene, the only other history they achieved was *(perhaps unintentionally)* establishing the basis for transferring millions of jobs, from - countries with a certain degree of labour freedom, to - a Country where labour is completely controlled by the government. Because their Working-class had already been *somewhat* uplifted through that labour freedom - it is *ironic* that these countries have *damaged* that Working-class in order to increase Merchant profits. By allowing their jobs to be transferred to a Country whose mass-murdering anti-spiritual ideology has also killed millions - *supposedly* to uplift the Working-class, but *ultimately* to just increase those profits. Which is also the *extreme opposite* of the result intended. But such ideological failures *does not* mean all who fought in these conflicts are automatically guilty of crimes and deserve contempt. Because they may *actually* have fought in a dignified way under the extreme circumstances of warfare - ua-cam.com/video/pV4yAluHLE8/v-deo.html. Even if they did not and are guilty of crimes the only acceptable response for them is *Compassion.* Either for the suffering they are *already* experiencing as a result of that, or the suffering they will *have* to experience in subsequent lives if they fail to achieve a Genuine Spiritual Transformation. So too for those whose corrupted ideas result in these crimes being committed. Especially if they do not understand the *terrible* consequences of their evil ways. The Vietnam War is yet another conflict rooted in the divisive policies of the corrupt foreigners who occupied that land some 20 years earlier. That was the vesting of military-political power in a religious-minority government that subsequently persecuted the majority. Which particular religions is irrelevant because history proves you’ll find the best of the best and the worst of the worst in any of them. What is relevant is the presence of corrupted beings on either side of these conflicts, with the harmless People caught in the middle, suffering at the hands of either or both. *This is why you should never be allied with corrupt forces to battle against other corrupt forces.* You should find another way to achieve your goals. Ultimately, the only way to win ideological wars is to avoid using extreme destructive force that will harm the harmless *or* impede their lives in a way that feeds that ideology. Because that will increase the power of its military-political base to recruit new fighters. For example, if that ideology is religious extremism their places of worship should not be bombed, if it is uplifting the Working-class their crops should not be destroyed. Instead their military power should be *accurately* reduced to zero all the way up to their political leadership. Whilst removing the ideological basis for them fighting by protecting those places of worship, helping improve crop-yields etc. Also, it is critically important to avoid engaging in any action that may *combine opposing identity factors,* which has the potential to expand a conflict to no end. For example - if an individual will fight for an ideology that supposedly uplifts their social-class, care must be taken not to attack their religion also because that gives them another reason to fight. Realising that, their military-political base will successfully expand their method of recruiting others to fight for their ideology on the basis of religion also, *even if* that ideology is fundamentally anti-spiritual. Other major identity factors include ethnicity & nationality. All of the above was far easier to manage in ancient times when it was just armies and their ideological leaders meeting on open battlefields.
It is infinitesimally more simple than that.. The reason the Vietnam War strategy was carried out the way it was, was simply in direct result of the aftermath of the Korean War years prior. The American people and those in government did not wanted to endure the prospects of another Chinese invasion and ultimate conflict escalation. It is for that very reason that the they used the (understandably very flawed in hindsight) approach of not moving North of the 17th parallel, and instead fought a protracted defensive ground-war and offensive air-war, in which incursions of the NVA past the southern-point of the 17th parallel and NLF/Vietcong infiltration of the South were to be fought within specified bounds. Which of course, ultimately failed because fighting a war where one belligerent is denied the capability of pursuing its enemy is a failing strategy. But the reasoning for it really is that simple. The American people would not accept an escalation akin to the war in Korea so the US fought with one hand tied behind its back.
The message during this era is Mao's determination of a pathway, that the residency had to swallow for terms of getting rid of the undesirable using an undesirable force. But he is more l:obe siding"in his thinking, all it did is retaliated against themselves....
This was one of the main mistakes of USSR. They should have kept good relationship with their main ally in China. While at the same time maintaining their superiority among allies.
sounds like Kruchev lost the cold war when he went with destalinization. A strong Aliance between USSR and CHina would have been pretty unstoppable as CHinas pop grew the USSR economicallywould have done alot better i assume
3) Do those pictures of the American table-tennis team in China look like amateur 'home movies' to you? Especially the giant Maoist placard (40:13) that is strangely written in English!
From what I see, what seems to be the best position to take is to be pro socialist in speech and sympathize with with communist promise of equality while maintaining a good and comfortable healthy life within a capitalist and corporate society, and denigrating capitalism at every opportunity and ignoring the history of communism inevitable outcome, but staying loyal to the fantasy. This way you may have your cake and eat it too.
well, no most of the rest of the world has noticed too it will just take a while for the people, not the politicians of the US to admit their hypocrisy don't hold your breath bear in mind tho that the problem as I see it is that the rich are trying to maintain their control by dividing us I know that sounds naive, but it is true
Yeah it’s you. If you think every country ever hasn’t projected their own shit on everyone else to varying degrees, maybe you need to actually learn history.
I like how most media at that time shamelessly presented facts : “the gate to friendly contact” - I see the hand of advisers behind literally handing a script. Not a conspiracy theorist myself but there was no friendship between China and US at that time. Only 2 rivals teaming up against the USSR .. Soviet Media were even worst of course. And although I find today’s media mostly pathetic, at the very least we can hear different opinion with indie ones. We just have to find them and make them live.
Khrushchev’s timely decision after Stalin’s death to Destalinize The old USSR from Stalins influence even after his passing was the true turning point in Sino-Soviet relations years later imo. In Mao’s view this action by Khrushchev weakened Communist world unity and solidarity and It’s likely that Mao feared/respected Khrushchev less than he did Stalin and gradually thought less of him with the succeeding years. In addition, Mao quite possibly hinted that the Soviets wanted to control China they way they controlled Eastern European members of Warsaw pact and refused to partake in aiding to strengthen Soviet Geopolitics at the time and went in another direction which years later led to the opening of U.S.-Chinese relations with Kissinger and Nixon.
Hey china seeing as your man won I can help you with information to block communications from Alaska Air Force radar sites. I also can give you real time info of aircraft type and direction of anything launching from JBER Like the big guy I expect compensation for this. We can talk more about other things to help you quest
who in the world is disliking this, but more importantly why? idk why but it seems funny to me to show dislike to something trying to document history. You may have disliked what happened but its not the documentary's fault. Makes me laugh.
What a reversal of fortune! Look at the manner of speech and arrogant body language of Yankees during that era. Thank goodness these yankees are no longer a super power.
to everyone outside of america and many of those inside it seems like the us is an increasingly nazi country. not dealing with your relative decline too well.
Brilliant Series! As a 30 yr old today. It’s a rare treasure to discover such a series.
Thanks for uploading
Enjoy. They don't make documentaries anymore. Just propaganda films dressed up as documentaries.
no series on Cold War will ever be so balanced and well narrated like this.
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
Chapters 📖🔖:
1:26 1949 Chinese Revolution
3:27 Mao visits Soviet Union 1949
6:18 Soviet-China Mutual Defence Treaty
7:47 Land Reform Movement
8:28 Korean War 1950
12:07 Khruschev's reign & Stalin's ⚰️
12:41 First Taiwan Strait Crisis 1954-55; Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty; 7th Fleet in SCS
16:08 Khruschev's Secret speech 🗣️ @ Soviet Communist Party's 20th Congress
17:29 Hungary🇭🇺 Revolution 1956
17:48 Sino-Soviet split: struggle of communist despots for pre-eminence
24:08 Great Leap Forward
27:49 🇷🇺-🇺🇸-🇬🇧 Partial Test Ban Treaty; PRC nuclear tests
29:22 Vietnam War; Chinese anti-Americanism
30:37 Great Cultural Revolution
34:17 Sino-Soviet border conflict 1969
38:22 Ping-pong 🏓 diplomacy (Neo-functionalism)
43:03 Nixon's visit to China 1972
you're the best!!
mao's voice is funny lmao
It cought my ear too...
RobZoneFire sounds like a squirrel barking 😂
I think his death squads kept him safe
LMAO Zedong
He seems a little
" Light in his Loafers "
If you know what I mean.
This documentary is in 360 p but content is priceless huge love from India❤❤❤❤
They just traded one emperor for another...
Exactly!
11/10 interviews in this docu series. Not to make it too precious, but it’s like a time capsule. From everyday citizens to leaders and government officials, to Fidel Castro and Hugh Hefner.
A word to the wise.... don't believe a damn word Castro (thank God he's dead) says when he claims he "gets $30 a month."
9,000-Rubles for a guest banquet. Quite capitalistic for an anti-capitalistic regime? - LOLOL, LOLOL, LOLOL !
+Paul singh-sangha I see you have no idea what capitalism is.
+Andrew Burtlow How doesn't he have any knowledge of capitalism?
+Paul singh-sangha Yes, I thought this was worth a wry smile too. I'm not sure it's strictly Capitalistic per sé, but it's certainly outside the spirit of Communism.
For Soviet Russia, this is not big surprise :3
:))) Capitalism or Communism ,but money are always MONEY !!
'Its right to rebel' says Mao. Well lets see the Chinese try that now...
Dissent is Democracy.
To be pedantic, what Mao meant was “the right to rebel against my former cadres who has betrayed me and only worship me”
I expected Mao to have a deeper voice than the voice from recording
I noticed from the older recordings the speakers tended to have higher pitched voice. I wonder if this was caused by how the microphones were produced at the times.
Same with Stalin and khrushchev, I think it’s the microphone of the time
Laughing about the translations of "old boot" and "old galosh"! Thanks for the heads up about what NOT TO call the Chinese old folks in my neighborhood! :-) (PS...they are wonderful people and neighbors whom I respect very much, I call them "Grandpa" and "Auntie" in Chinese, they don't know a lot of English.)
Brilliant documentary series, one of the best of its kind. I watched so many times.. just look China in 2022. .. absolutely astonishing...
Thanks to dumbass Americans buying cheap crap at Wal-Mart
How sad people fought so hard for an illusion that never brought their dreams.
its sadder that ppl still believe that illusion
and absolutly insane how many people in the west, well educated people, who belived that crab as well, and still does to a large exstent.
Someting went very wrong in men history after allies won ww2,More people died than all the 2 great war combined
@@montypython4ever You can notice them by their ingratitude, lack of belief in facts and smug entitlement. History will not look kindly on them.
Am preparing my one year plan to land the girl of my dreams. Isn't that a great leap forward? 😁😁
after that year you have to hold a parade with banners and make a propaganda movie telling the world you landed 3 girls.
Be sure to look before you leap
Of course bro we shall even hold a parade for you😂
38:30 First he shits on the Americans and the West and now magically he wants better relationship with them?
Nice meme Mao, nice meme.
Vanguard Veteran
Well that was Nixon, and well he just despise the way the west work unlike the soviets who used provocative stuffs
He kept being vulgar even later. When Nixon and Kissinger first came to visit China, Mao commented that they "dressed up for the meeting like some prostitutes". But I have an impression that this kind of language was usual for Mao. :)
The US needed a place to industrialise and compete with Europe after they recovered from WW2. The US Backed the Nationalists, Who stole all of China's treasury and ran to Taiwan. Opium Drug lord who then shot the Taiwanese.
This documentary really interviewed lots of famous Chinese dissidents in exile!
That guy complaining about the Russians throwing the bill at them I say: there’s no such thing as a free lunch. Lol
I remember Mao he was a cool guy we were friends n all, we text messaged each other a lot....thank god for google translate.
Sid W S Andrew Afyouni you're delusional
An A-Bomb that has Made In China written on it. Now that's a scary thing. lol
As long as our A-Bombs don't have made in China maybe we stand a chance. I like what you wrote.
Not as bad as a virus that has Made in China written in its RNA
@@oimate3 It worked about as well as anything else stamped with "Made in China"
@@logicplague2077 lol I guess you're right about that
The scary ones are the ones who already used it. Not the China not anyone else
theres no mentioning of china us and taiwan relations
How quickly the Chinese forgot the US supplied and helped them against the Japanese in WW2
How quickly the US is going to be fucked for being nosey cunts & not minding there own business
@Blowing Whistle says the yank. Only a yank would use the term 'moron'
You seem to forget there were 2 sides in the Chinese Civil War, the Communists and The Nationalists, they had been fighting each other since the 20s but put thier differences aside to deal with the Japanese invasion of China during WW2, but within months of WW2 ending they were fighting each other again, in the end the Communists had the hearts and minds of a lot of the Chinese population, the Nationalists had maintained control via warlord governor's for years and they often treated the average Chinese person like slaves so the bulk of the population were open to communist subversion/ indoctrination
The US always interferes in other countries forgetting difference in culture and history hence fucking up all these countries this will lead to it's ultimate downfall
Kruschev wearing a dark hat with a pale suit.
The humanity...
In episode about Korean war it was said that 500k Chinese troops went to Korea. Now in this episode I hear 1 million. WTF authors? Very inconsistent.
They said 500k in Korea episode and in this episode it's 1 million. I don't expect very truthful approach but this is very inconsistent.
They meant 500k chi com soldiers from the pla were involved in the first wave of chineese intervention . There were over a million involved and probably half of them were to become casualties
I noticed that too. Maybe they meant half a million in the beginning of the war
The guy Wu Ningkun at 23:47 died recently in august of 2019 aged 99
What an interesting life that man must've led
@@zachhoward9099 exaclty
28:29 -- They put protective gear on the horses.
That's probably the only thing I will take away from this video in the long-term.
7:55 The more things change, the more they stay the same.
MAO: "Ok, now that we won, I'm going to still kill, oh I don't know, about 50,000,00 of you guys."
Pedro Ortega my cat is named chairman meow.
pffffffffffff.
Only 50 mil?
@@veterankasrkin7416 Pfffffffff. Ya.
@Pedro Ortega And perhaps most infuriating of all is his supreme arrogance and presumed right to rule was only matched by his total incompetence and shameless truth-spinning. Stalin at least did something for the Soviet economy. Mao left China as the same agrarian shithole he found it in, he had just destroyed their history/culture and literally liquified their brains.
The great leap forward? Yep into you're grave !
32:21, the slogan of Chinese Communism: "It's alright to rebel"
45:35 These particular individuals are *ideologically* responsible for crimes against humanity during the Vietnam War, the result of applying Merchant-class accounting principles to matters of warfare. They measured military success in terms of the number of enemy killed, to achieve victory within a certain timeframe, and minimise the resources consumed. This was *supposed* to avoid the repercussions of a long drawn-out conflict, and thereby secure their own political futures. But as with *any ideology that is fundamentally corrupt the end result is always the extreme opposite of that intended* - millions of civilian deaths, a long drawn-out conflict, and then ultimately losing that war.
As outlined in this scene, the only other history they achieved was *(perhaps unintentionally)* establishing the basis for transferring millions of jobs, from - countries with a certain degree of labour freedom, to - a Country where labour is completely controlled by the government. Because their Working-class had already been *somewhat* uplifted through that labour freedom - it is *ironic* that these countries have *damaged* that Working-class in order to increase Merchant profits. By allowing their jobs to be transferred to a Country whose mass-murdering anti-spiritual ideology has also killed millions - *supposedly* to uplift the Working-class, but *ultimately* to just increase those profits. Which is also the *extreme opposite* of the result intended.
But such ideological failures *does not* mean all who fought in these conflicts are automatically guilty of crimes and deserve contempt. Because they may *actually* have fought in a dignified way under the extreme circumstances of warfare - ua-cam.com/video/pV4yAluHLE8/v-deo.html. Even if they did not and are guilty of crimes the only acceptable response for them is *Compassion.* Either for the suffering they are *already* experiencing as a result of that, or the suffering they will *have* to experience in subsequent lives if they fail to achieve a Genuine Spiritual Transformation. So too for those whose corrupted ideas result in these crimes being committed. Especially if they do not understand the *terrible* consequences of their evil ways.
The Vietnam War is yet another conflict rooted in the divisive policies of the corrupt foreigners who occupied that land some 20 years earlier. That was the vesting of military-political power in a religious-minority government that subsequently persecuted the majority. Which particular religions is irrelevant because history proves you’ll find the best of the best and the worst of the worst in any of them. What is relevant is the presence of corrupted beings on either side of these conflicts, with the harmless People caught in the middle, suffering at the hands of either or both. *This is why you should never be allied with corrupt forces to battle against other corrupt forces.* You should find another way to achieve your goals.
Ultimately, the only way to win ideological wars is to avoid using extreme destructive force that will harm the harmless *or* impede their lives in a way that feeds that ideology. Because that will increase the power of its military-political base to recruit new fighters. For example, if that ideology is religious extremism their places of worship should not be bombed, if it is uplifting the Working-class their crops should not be destroyed. Instead their military power should be *accurately* reduced to zero all the way up to their political leadership. Whilst removing the ideological basis for them fighting by protecting those places of worship, helping improve crop-yields etc.
Also, it is critically important to avoid engaging in any action that may *combine opposing identity factors,* which has the potential to expand a conflict to no end. For example - if an individual will fight for an ideology that supposedly uplifts their social-class, care must be taken not to attack their religion also because that gives them another reason to fight. Realising that, their military-political base will successfully expand their method of recruiting others to fight for their ideology on the basis of religion also, *even if* that ideology is fundamentally anti-spiritual. Other major identity factors include ethnicity & nationality.
All of the above was far easier to manage in ancient times when it was just armies and their ideological leaders meeting on open battlefields.
It is infinitesimally more simple than that.. The reason the Vietnam War strategy was carried out the way it was, was simply in direct result of the aftermath of the Korean War years prior.
The American people and those in government did not wanted to endure the prospects of another Chinese invasion and ultimate conflict escalation. It is for that very reason that the they used the (understandably very flawed in hindsight) approach of not moving North of the 17th parallel, and instead fought a protracted defensive ground-war and offensive air-war, in which incursions of the NVA past the southern-point of the 17th parallel and NLF/Vietcong infiltration of the South were to be fought within specified bounds.
Which of course, ultimately failed because fighting a war where one belligerent is denied the capability of pursuing its enemy is a failing strategy. But the reasoning for it really is that simple. The American people would not accept an escalation akin to the war in Korea so the US fought with one hand tied behind its back.
Russia - "We're the Marxists"
China - "No we're the Marxists!"
North Korea - no! we are longer lasting “cult of personality” Marxism
Marx
" And this is why we can't have nice things "
Got chills on the rail move. Fuck nothing wrong here
33:27 poor soviet diplomats who were based in beijing.
British embassy staff was even beaten and killed.
The Great Leap Forward...into the grave
Mao,s voice is ashaming
and if you carrying pictures of chairman Mao '' you ain't gonna make it with anyone any how ,,
The message during this era is Mao's determination of a pathway, that the residency had to swallow for terms of getting rid of the undesirable using an undesirable force. But he is more l:obe siding"in his thinking, all it did is retaliated against themselves....
Why no mention of Sino-India war?
Shashank Trivedi That was after Mao
@@suppandi1000 no it did not
Mike tyson has a mao tattoo on his arm . True story.
f course cnn gives Nixon credit for Kruschevs failure he just didnt f up a hand shake
This was one of the main mistakes of USSR. They should have kept good relationship with their main ally in China. While at the same time maintaining their superiority among allies.
sounds like Kruchev lost the cold war when he went with destalinization. A strong Aliance between USSR and CHina would have been pretty unstoppable as CHinas pop grew the USSR economicallywould have done alot better i assume
If USSR was dependent on China to fulfill its food needs instead of the USA everyone would have starved again in the 10s of millions in the 60s
Read Frank Dikotters devastating trilogy on Maos China
I call it the great backwards flip instead
3) Do those pictures of the American table-tennis team in China look like amateur 'home movies' to you? Especially the giant Maoist placard (40:13) that is strangely written in English!
These people surely did not speak English at this time.
From what I see, what seems to be the best position to take is to be pro socialist in speech and sympathize with with communist promise of equality while maintaining a good and comfortable healthy life within a capitalist and corporate society, and denigrating capitalism at every opportunity and ignoring the history of communism inevitable outcome, but staying loyal to the fantasy. This way you may have your cake and eat it too.
Obama ? Ha ha !
Murder make History
Is it me who always think that USA criticizes other countries in do doing the crimes it itself exactly does?
well, no
most of the rest of the world has noticed
too
it will just take a while for the people,
not the politicians
of the US
to admit their hypocrisy
don't hold your breath
bear in mind tho
that the problem as I see it is
that the rich are trying to maintain
their control
by dividing us
I know that sounds naive, but it is true
Yeah it’s you. If you think every country ever hasn’t projected their own shit on everyone else to varying degrees, maybe you need to actually learn history.
39:09 murderous thug
I like how most media at that time shamelessly presented facts : “the gate to friendly contact” - I see the hand of advisers behind literally handing a script. Not a conspiracy theorist myself but there was no friendship between China and US at that time. Only 2 rivals teaming up against the USSR .. Soviet Media were even worst of course.
And although I find today’s media mostly pathetic, at the very least we can hear different opinion with indie ones. We just have to find them and make them live.
Khrushchev’s timely decision after Stalin’s death to Destalinize The old USSR from Stalins influence even after his passing was the true turning point in Sino-Soviet relations years later imo. In Mao’s view this action by Khrushchev weakened Communist world unity and solidarity and It’s likely that Mao feared/respected Khrushchev less than he did Stalin and gradually thought less of him with the succeeding years. In addition, Mao quite possibly hinted that the Soviets wanted to control China they way they controlled Eastern European members of Warsaw pact and refused to partake in aiding to strengthen Soviet Geopolitics at the time and went in another direction which years later led to the opening of U.S.-Chinese relations with Kissinger and Nixon.
Just shows us that 2 people can believe in the exact same thing for completely different reasons.
Hey china seeing as your man won I can help you with information to block communications from Alaska Air Force radar sites. I also can give you real time info of aircraft type and direction of anything launching from JBER Like the big guy I expect compensation for this. We can talk more about other things to help you quest
Who's here from Mr. Chase's history class? @
Seems like a documentary on Black Lives Matter
?
who in the world is disliking this, but more importantly why? idk why but it seems funny to me to show dislike to something trying to document history. You may have disliked what happened but its not the documentary's fault. Makes me laugh.
why the hell would China seek aid from a country like Russia that needs aid themselves!?? Russians are starving, how are they going to aid anyone
TTstone616 lol you should not buy into the propaganda russia has been the number 2 superpower since ww2... (fellow american)
Dustin Smith that is true. I guess i was referring to the headlines lately... back in the cold war they were a lot bigger than they "SEEM".
what the fuck are you talking about tt?
@@felixphilippe7224 he obviously has a poor grasp of Cold War history
@@dsmith977 there was literally a famine in the USSR from 1946-47
Let's Go Brandon
I hope trump drops the soap in prison. Traitor repugniqunts
33:00
Anyone here from ovitt
LMao Zedong
How loud was that
A few famous war criminals in this documentary, Kissinger, Ford, Nixon, Mao etc . Today’s episode would have, ZELENSKY, BIDEN, SUNAK, TRUDEAU.
What a reversal of fortune! Look at the manner of speech and arrogant body language of Yankees during that era. Thank goodness these yankees are no longer a super power.
We could annihilate you in seconds.
Look everyone, I'm Agtsmirnoff, I'm a deeply frustrated person!
Agtsmirnoff sound like a nazi lol (fellow american)
to everyone outside of america and many of those inside it seems like the us is an increasingly nazi country. not dealing with your relative decline too well.
And thank goodness 'arshad afzai' isn't an arrogant racist!!