I do maven, betrayal and alva all in once lol. Sound so stupid but actually kinda fun and good profit, catarina is sleeper op each veiled orb is 14div and it drop per 5-6 attempts, the maven chisels are also very good money, and alva just because its fast
so update... i am enjoying this more than i should :) best thing is that i do not run mindlessly one map again and again. And for some reason, over 20 invitations in, one orb for 1D and thats all.. she really hates me
" With the two sets I ran, I think you can safely expect between 0.6 and 0.7 divines of profit per map." Your mean per map or per invitation? I'd like to test this strat now
Thanks. Will have to watch again. In his provided tree, it doesn’t take the Huck node which seems like something you’d want, so I figured the whole tree might be in error.
@@spt2527 hmmm, interesting. I just checked the tree again and Huck's node is selected. It's the bottom left bunch of heist nodes (inbetween Ritual and Delirum) right? It's selected when I take a look at it.
I doubled checked the link. It is correct. In the second half of the video I talked about some changes to the tree. The linked tree is what I am using now
I do maven, betrayal and alva all in once lol. Sound so stupid but actually kinda fun and good profit, catarina is sleeper op each veiled orb is 14div and it drop per 5-6 attempts, the maven chisels are also very good money, and alva just because its fast
so update... i am enjoying this more than i should :) best thing is that i do not run mindlessly one map again and again. And for some reason, over 20 invitations in, one orb for 1D and thats all.. she really hates me
Hey that's awesome! Glad you are enjoying it. The special chisels and maven writs are where a lot of money comes from too!
" With the two sets I ran, I think you can safely expect between 0.6 and 0.7 divines of profit per map." Your mean per map or per invitation? I'd like to test this strat now
i got 30 divines in 12 rotations, or 48 maps and 12 invitations. So that is 0.625 divines per map ran. Give it a shot!
Cool idea. Linked passive tree is different from the one shown in the video.
About half way through he says that he wanted to try it again because the first batch felt a bit too lucky and decided to min-max away from Betrayal.
Thanks. Will have to watch again. In his provided tree, it doesn’t take the Huck node which seems like something you’d want, so I figured the whole tree might be in error.
@@spt2527 hmmm, interesting. I just checked the tree again and Huck's node is selected. It's the bottom left bunch of heist nodes (inbetween Ritual and Delirum) right? It's selected when I take a look at it.
I doubled checked the link. It is correct. In the second half of the video I talked about some changes to the tree. The linked tree is what I am using now
linked tree is different
In the second half of the video I talk about revisions to the tree. Tree in description s what I am using now