MOST EXPENSIVE NFTs EVER SOLD!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 тра 2024
- Sidemen React to The Most Expensive NFTs
ORIGINAL VIDEO: • The Most Expensive NFT...
🍗: Order food NOW at: www.eatsides.com/
🎥: Access exclusive content at: www.sideplus.com/
🍹: XIX Vodka: www.xixvodka.com/
👉🏻: Subscribe to our Reacts Channel: / sidemenreacts 👈🏻
👕: Sidemen Clothing: sidemenclothing.com
👉🏻 Subscribe to our 2nd Channel: / moresidemen 👈🏻
📸: Sidemen Instagram: / sidemen
🐤: Sidemen Twitter: / sidemen
#SidemenReacts #Reacts - Розваги
This is the first time i see jj bieng serious in a video 😂😂
*being
@M I A •© shut up
@@ranempel7164 shut up
@dream women❤ shut up
ua-cam.com/video/n72kkazUgAs/v-deo.html
TOTALLY EXPOSED..😅😅😅😅😅 Cult group ksi
This whole video sounded like JJ trying to convince himself NFTs are a good thing.
ppl are making millions of it lmao
@@nithinbiju938 people are also losing millions of it
The idea of actually own them and collect them is stupid, but the idea of making money out of it isn’t
REALLY
ua-cam.com/video/pFWy3o9TybY/v-deo.html
.q
A
the tech is cool but the current use is dogshit lmao
For those who wonders why NFT is a thing : Money Laundering.
COOLDEST SIDEMEN MOMENTS ua-cam.com/video/p5YFpv9ux7A/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/ikKMexzKrMo/v-deo.html
Wonder why this left hook is a thing
lol ok boomer
Exactly. Fuck NFTs
I'm not opposed to the whole NFT thing but there is no way on earth that the $69mil NFT wasn't some sort of money laundering or a scheme to get rid of some dirty money.
It was bought i think by an owner of a crypto exchange, so yeah it's a tax right off but I guess he bought it just to say he owns it
All nfts are money laundering. I thought everyone knew that. A digital picture is not worth 69 mil and never should. Who the fuck wants a digital image let's be real. There's alot of really really good digital art that was made before nfts and literally 0 people cared. But when a pixilated monkey comes along that's worth 10 mil now people care. It's just a money laundering scheme and it's a pretty obvious one.
@@Unknownz000 what a stupid and uneducated blanked statement that is lmao
@@connor7096 "uneducated". What are you? A nft crypto punk expert? Don't make me laugh. How the fuck can you be educated about shitty pixels that go for millions for no reason. You don't. All I said was 100% true. If you genuinely think that 8 pixels can be worth millions then you genuinely need to seek medical attention. No one casually pays 69 mil from their own pockets for an online picture. How the fuck will they make their money back? There's literally no one other than themselves that can pay and is willing to pay that much for a digital picture except the person who bought it. It's just stupid, it truly is.
@@Unknownz000 let the guy cope lol. He might have lost bucks over it lmao. 😂
The nft comparison with art and reprints isn't really analogous though:
For physical art, the replicas aren't hand painted in oil paints and are instead printed in ink on masss and resold at a tiny cost due to the loss of rarity.
Nft's are digital images where the copies are indistinguishable from the original. The only distinction is you have that image on the etherum block chain ( not sure if you can mint your own copies though). Owning an NFT also does not mean you own the image rights to that art/ design which i think some people assume.
What's the point of owning them?
Exactly. You summed it up pretty accurately.
I still can't fathom the idea of pixel art being a commodity
It is stupid most people compare it with just take a picture of painting or in front of some expensive house." But if u own an nft I can use it just like u so there is nothing else in it.
@@tyrant_hermit it's art, you resell it and make profit and the artist gets a certain percent off it lol
JJ WAS TRYING HIS HARD TO CONVINCE HIM SELF THAT NFTS ARE GOOD LMAO
really?? he isnt trying he knows its good
Probably hard invested in it probably not going to get his money unless some idiot waste money on it.
@@hardym9532 that's sadly the thing with this. 99% of idiots only invest in is as a speculative asset and nothing else. Made by rich people to gain money from idiots for nothing of actual value.
@@rikittu yeah at this point the people who think this is a good idea probably have money on it already and trying to scam people or are stupid
@@hardym9532 bro haven't you ever spent money on skins in a game? How hard is it to understand?
JJ trying to convince them nft's are good is so funny
REALLY
ua-cam.com/video/pFWy3o9TybY/v-deo.html
Q
Q
.
Try to convince them this left hook is bad
They spread wealth. Anything that spreads wealth is beneficial
convince me gokus gay
get out
JJ tries to convince himself that NFT's aren't dumb for 10 minutes straight
Not at all. They're not dumb. The system is currently flawed, but it works, makes sense and is in no way dumb. Screenshotting it is like taking the picture of painting. It's your proof of ownership that matters. It's all about the money.
@@deepaparakkal4241 okay but taking a picture of the mona lisa and taking a picture of a couple of pixels is different
Ik those pixels that took little time to make may mean a lot to some people but the peices of art from 100s of years ago mean much more
@@deepaparakkal4241 cannot compare nfts to the mona lisa one is a peice of art history the other is trash digital art with minimal effort
@@deepaparakkal4241 screenshot or original. It’s a jpeg. Photo or the Mona Lisa. Ones a jpeg the other is art. NFT are so stupid
@@deepaparakkal4241 lmao the whole concept of NFTs is dogshit and even NFT holders agree to this😂 they admit that they try to find someone dumber to sell it at a higher price 💀 there are many other ways to provide a proof of ownership and the blockchain technology is just one of them which is massively flawed
Didn't realise JJ was one of those people who get angry when you screenshot their NFT.
He doesn't 😂 he just thinks it's stupid, because it means nothing.
Jj crying about people screenshoting nfts is really funny to me
REALLY
ua-cam.com/video/pFWy3o9TybY/v-deo.html
Q
Q
ikr people just dont understand that its literally data. people keep comparing it to taking a picture of a painting, but i think its more accurate to think of it as pirating a game or movie
COOLDEST SIDEMEN MOMENTS ua-cam.com/video/p5YFpv9ux7A/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/ikKMexzKrMo/v-deo.html
Lmao the cope
Vikk keeping JJ in check was so good LMAO. "they only unrealized gains" HAHAHA
Vikk the real money man. might not be richer but he knows his finances better
He is richer lmao
Man just took all that out of one sentence. He's just letting his made money sit in USDC and could sell it anytime and make it realized gains. So he has made profits, but just hasn't converted them back into fiat money.
Especially here in Germany it's a thing to wait one year before selling ur crypto, because you'll have to pay taxes on it if you made more profits than 600€ in a year.
unrealized means that he hasn’t sold it yet, but he’s still made money on it, he still made the right investment
JJ being the exact stereotype of dumb NFT buyers is so funny
And he's the one making money off of it.
@@deepaparakkal4241 and?
Just say you’re broke
@@DylanDocker “subscribe with notifications on or you will have seven years of bad luck” clown ass
@@deepaparakkal4241 he literally said he hasn’t sold any yet
If Josh the finance man and vik the brain boy are arguing against jj you know who's wrong before knowing the topic
And they made 0. While JJ is is making millions. So who's really wrong?
@@haridaspalleeri6765 JJ can make millions because he has millions to waste. It's easy to make a dollar per dollar invested. If he was a normal man with a normal budget he would've been bankrupt 10 times over by now. For the amount of money JJ spent and wasted on imaginary things on the internet man could've bought property that will always have value.
@@haridaspalleeri6765 in one of the moresidemen videos didn't we find out (indirect based on their reaction) that Vik had more money than jj, and he also bought a massive house as well
@@darklord279 no ones talking about the net worth. I'm talking about profit made from NFTs
@@ravemasterdbzwwe ofcourse. I agree hundred percent. Its a high roller game. If you got money, you can make more that's it
To me NFT's dont make sense because at least with real physical art, I feel like it takes more actual skill and on top of that, it can be used as home decor to add personality or make a certain real life space look nicer. Whereas NFT's its stuck on your phone and realistically you only truly own a link to a picture because people can screen shot and have a truly 100% identical picture. Real physical art cannot be copied, at least that easily. Physical art made by hand (painting drawing etc) is hard to copy without very apparent flaws.
well people want you to see private sex becoz you have too much knowledge bout nfts
This.
Beeple puts allot of skill into his art, check his website out. Those crypto punks though, I mean anyone can create that
Okay first of all just cause they're digital does not mean they're easy. You should try making actual good digital art. You'll see it requires a lot of skill.
A huge chunk of the value of NFTs come from the ability to verify the originals. When they mint or what normal people call "upload" they are uploaded with data verifiable on the blockchain. Even if you upload tens or thousands of the same image, people can easily look up the metadata of your NFT and identify that it's not the original. btw physical art can be copied.
Why are NFTs expensive? easy. cause people like to flex. a bag does not cost a lot but a gucci bag is worth a few months salary in some country.
A lot of things don't make sense but just cause you think that way doesn't mean the same for others. Money follows people. as long as there's demand people would continue buying.
how you be hanging physical art on the wall of your home in the Metaverse though?
Selling art NFTs I can understand. Those cryptopunk avatars: idiotic. Definitely used for money laundering.
@@calfr4231 crypto is untraceable, as opposed to going to an art show and paying cash lol
@@calfr4231 you're the one who don't know what you're talking about
@@calfr4231 dude If you don't go to art auctions then what are they for?
@@notjhoan yeah but ntfs are not art they are ret@rded pictures of monkeys
I use nft to sell my art as well. So thank you for understanding. 😊 I wish some people did understood it more 🙄
NFTs are not comparable to a physical painting, even if it's one of a kind it doesn't physically exist outside of a virtual environment. But it's a much easier and lowkey way to launder money which is why it's popping off, it is mostly launderers and people like JJ that are fooled by it having actual value beyond a medium for money creation.
You are so lost you’ll learn one day tho crypt and nfts are all connected we will be the rich you will not be unless you decide to learn watch Ellios trades and Alec Becker your welcome
I think they are comparable to a physical painting. The point is that they have "artificial" value. It's demand pricing, same as anything else
NFT’s are embarrassing and this is the first time in 10 years that I’ve cringed at JJ.
If it was just financial, then that would be fair enough but to try to explain why they are anything more than that is just so off…
You just don't understand them, when JJ's a billionaire from it you will regret cringing.
@@KentVigilante He just said he doesn’t mind financially dipshit. But NFT’s on their own are indeed embarrassing, like they have no tangible value to them, they are just rights to a digital image which you can just look at for free.
Fax
@@KentVigilante imagine protecting NFT just because someone you "idolized" really into it
It IS just financial. In fact, I'm impressed at JJ.
for anyone wondering about why they're so expensive;
Money laundering
i swear to god, nobody can actually explain what an nfts actual purpose is, they always say you get to own ur media as a token or some bs smh
@@ryanm4074 it basically a receipt showing proof of a purchase and ownership of something
also your comment got stolen by some next guy called pepper
verified guy robbed you lmao
@@ryanm4074 there arent a lot of purposes now but many people buy into nfts because they believe the team behind nft will create a utility like a game or access to an exclusive club or benifits that will provide value
@@christianhoy8447 I belive most people buy them in hope of great returns (like lotto ticket in a sence). They rarely look past that and see it as a potential way to get rich fast.
JJ is trying his hardest to defend nfts and it's hilarious
JJ's owning the Mona Lisa with a pic analogy is really interesting. If NFTs are so valuable, the Louvre should just make a certified digital rendition of the Mona Lisa and start an online gallery. People fly all over the world to see the real thing but how many would pay a tenner to watch it's 'million dollar' NFT version?
Exactly, and the digital version will stay the same throughout all devices when bought or screenshotted, whereas the photograph/printed version of the Mona Lisa will never be the same as seeing the real oil painting with your own eyes
That's not the point. It's that screenshotting NFTs is like printing an artwork. In the end you'll just have a fake version you won't be able to sell. If you just want it for the art, go for it and screenshot or print every artwork. But if you wanna make money, that screenshot ain't nothing but taking up ur phone's storage.
And tbh, NFTs are less about art and more about supply and demand. There's many lit and bad NFTs, but in the end I won't buy the lit one if there's no demand and will buy the bad one if there is demand.
@@talldado449 That's just brokering. And that's what makes these million dollar NFTs a joke. Because people believe their value would only increase in the future. But the problem is it's being valued by brokers like you whose only intention is to sell as quickly as possible. A Monet in a private collection only becomes rarer after being out of the public eye for few years. Museums would pay a lot for it to exhibit it. There is no intrinsic value to NFTs, just piled-on broker fees. Even a bling guy wouldn't showcase NFT art on a digital display.
@@SlashyClapton Yeah, most of the million dollar NFTs are pointless tbh. But there's many NFTs with utility now.
NFTs is just buying (mostly) Ethereum, with a picture as bonus and being able to spot trade that Ethereum with the art often deciding the demand.
People in the NFT space always say art is secondary, if the demand is there go try to flip it. It all sounded dumb to me at first, but if it brings me money I don't care.
I'll probably buy my first NFT soon (Hapebeast) if I get pre access. I'll maybe update y'all on how much I made.
KSI looks like he is trying to persuade everyone that he is the NFT master
NFTs are good for copyrighted material, buying a photo of a ‘crypto punk’ is fucking retarded. We are in the equivalent of a .com boom. Stay safe.
JJ NFT NEEK OLATUNJI
@@alexfx7500 i agree, nfts that are worth less than hundreds is understandable.
JJ about to spend a couple million on Keemstar nude NFTs n hope that eventually he can sell a pic of a gnomes junk for a profit but admit in a future video that he lost 10 mil on those NFTs
The NFT market will decline when most people realise that they don't need to purchase an NFT to have it. Yes, the whole screenshot argument has become an overused joke at this point but its point somehow still stands. Physical art is a tangible piece that gains value because of its actual presence and history behind it. We know about all the expensive paintings mainly because there's history attached to them that might not even be related directly to the art itself. But there are so many paintings in the market that are sold at a regular price that we don't hear about. NFTs on the other hand are all valued absurdly with little to no benefits. Its bought by the super rich who can use it to build connections and will exit out after the whole wave has died out.
People were saying the same about Crypto when it started. You'll see. NFTs are all about ownership and money, not the art. People need to realise that.
@@deepaparakkal4241 doesnt change anything lol, nfts are going to fall off like how vine was - remember when some thought vine might genuinely overthrow youtube?
@@deepaparakkal4241 "nft is about the money" thats the problem
@@deepaparakkal4241 and you'll notice that those crypto currencies whjch don't have any signs of utility in the future have all died down. The market eventually corrects itself and it will happen to the nft market as well.
you are so stupid... 2.0 already in the work and be ready for next year... NFT is the future
5:55 Tobi is me when I keep getting talked over 😭😂
Idk if I’m just a regular peasant but I think NFTs are just one of the most dumbest things to spend money on. It’s just a picture on your computer that anyone can screenshot and it’s not like you can like hold and feel the difference.
If you think nfts are dumb then you just don't worship money the way those people do
JJ being so close by so far to summing up these big NFT purchases are just tax evasion/laundering
Just because you can't wrap your head round why some people would spend so much on them, doesn't mean that they're money laundering schemes.
@@JYGtube It also doesn’t mean they arnt. Wrap your head around this: normally the rich (like most recently Ken Griffen who bid the US constitution for 50-something million dollars and then immediately “donated” it to a museum), don’t do it out of the goodness of their hearts. But of course, this is tax evasion and not money laundering. So where does crypto come in? Well first off crypto is decentralized (or centralized but that defeats the whole point of its existence) and damn near impossible to track. Oh, and when you create an NFT you can make it any price you want. No auction. No appraisal. No witnesses. No nothing. You can one man clean your money. Its almost too easy. Of course to piece this together you need not to be so naive. Yes NFT’s have a future, because it allows for making pretty much anything unique. But the current jpegs selling for 1-500 million dollars are not for art appreciation. Hell, even the Mona Lisa is appraised near the same price of these 5 minute jpegs.
Are NFT’s revolutionary?
Maybe.
Are these JPEG prices natural?
No.
@@muzafferozen1887 I never said they are or aren't, you're the one that made the claim that they're all money laundering schemes. I ain't reading that essay either, don't know who you typed that shit for 😂
@@JYGtube >I ain't reading that essay either
average crypto bro
JJ crying about people screenshoting nfts is really funny to me 😂😂💙
Poor person mindset
@@uatom Cope
JJ trying to persuade Vik and Josh like he's the wolf of Wall street
The problem with NFT I see is that its all subjective like all art, but they are all digital. And if a person is looking at it as an investment with patterns and quick sure money then they are wrong. It all depends on the mood of the billionaires and what they think is worth investing. Its like the big bets table in a casino. Totally outta the reach of the 99%
All NFT’s aren’t worth millions. What warped perception do you have
I can understand like an online card trading game because you still get value from being able to use those cards(or whatever game pieces) in the game. NFTs just seems very strange to me
REALLY
ua-cam.com/video/pFWy3o9TybY/v-deo.html
.....
Bruh and people comparing it to real world item are actually dumb it not even close to it first off nft is digital that a huge difference and card game are different from nft cause of the branding of the card like pokemon, baseball card, basketball card, they’re based off something people enjoy and have a huge brand behind unlike these random 2d avatars
You can use nfts in games where the cards are nfts
It's funny because there are actually nft trading card games already.
nfts that are worth 10-100$ i understand, but the rest is just....
This is the first sidemen reacts where JJ was actually being serious
REALLY
ua-cam.com/video/pFWy3o9TybY/v-deo.html
A
A
A.
I still can't wrap my head around how NFTs have such high value, I can understand how gold and diamonds are worth alot. If the hype of NFTs died, would the NFT values drop?
Obviously
If the demand dies, of course value drops.
diamonds and gold are valuable because there is a finite amount of them, NFTs are "valuable" cuz rich people wanted to launder their money.
You’re acting that question as if you’re Einstein trying to figure out the wonders of the world, no shit Sherlock.
Nothing because it’s all nonsense. A fad but for crypto investors it’s good for them to stimulate demand lol
lol I use to think NFTs were just stupid jpegs, but then I joined the Bangsta Bear discord and fell in love with the amount of free knowledge they have in there and the community. Have come to learn that its much more then a jpeg haha.
I don't disagree that they're not stupid but taking a picture of a NFT and a picture of art are two very different things
Oh look a pro-NFT comment on a 2 day old video, that mysteriously has over 700 likes in under 2 hours. But only one reply. That's not suspicious at all.
@@pismodude2 lol mans suddenly dedicated his acc to nfts
It’s probably one of the stupidest things I have ever found out about.
i didnt actually think ppl like u were real ngl
This was actually really great video listening to you guys talking about this you should make a podcast on side+ or youtube for this
Surprised no one brought up how insanely bad the effect nfts have on the environment is. Everytime one is sold it takes a massive amount of computing power in systems all across the world. Using up as much energy in each sale as some small towns use in weeks or months
That's not the NFTs fault tho. It's the fault of the token. And that's only if the token is proof of work (mining). Most token are proof of stake, with Ethereum (most NFTs are on Ethereum) going over to proof of stake too.
So NFTs on Solana or Polygon are definitely not insanely bad for the environment.
@@talldado449 yes yes kill the planet for a ms paint monkey, sounds good.
@@halcyoned Proof of stake is eco friendly, proof of work (Bitcoin) is not and is requiring a lot of computing power and all that hardware. There's no NFTs on the Bitcoin blockchain.
There are blockchains such as WAX apparently where you can mint nfts super cheap or even with ETH it may be possible with MATIC or Loopring etc
@@talldado449 there's no point arguing with these idiots. They just read something on twitter and know absolutely nothing about the technology
As a poor person seeing how rich people spend their money at times makes me glad I'm poor.
Yes 😂
Lmao fr
If you invested into NFT’s you wouldn’t be poor.
Sir Tim Berners-Lee is not a billionaire from his creation despite its impact on society because he gave it to the world for free, with no patent and no royalties due. Just makes him even more of a legend!
luckily not American or else it would’ve been way different
the fact that there is a market for nft's, despite their obvious downsides when compared to physical art, is the point they are making in this video.
why allow these things to be used when you could sell them for money?
i still dont understand them though.
Money Laundering babyy, thats how the world for the rich works, we might call them dumb for spending millions on KBs of data but they r the ones having the last laugh
Also this isnt just limited to digital art, ever wondered why artists like Damien Hirst r able to sell their lame art pieces in millions? Same reason, money laundering
New video title : JJ waffling for 11 minutes straight
Lmao I actually enjoyed Josh's little talks
"Literally three pixels of gold" 5:15 😂😂😂
NFT’s are a way to launder money
And avoid tax
So is art, the entire high end art world is a scam for laundering money and has been for years, children on the Internet have only just found out nfts are the same and think this is something to be mad about, it's not, your own government launder money on a daily basis and you pay no mind
Yep but wait for the fans to raid this comment and tell you they’re a smart investment 🤣
@@michaelhamilton4133 my friend literally made $100 profit flipping an nft today lmao, ignorance is bliss
@@DankSwegSkuxxXhayel u mean scammed someone?
Vik is absolutely right at the end.
One of my top sidemen reacts video, so good😂😂
Someone screenshot nfts and post it on jjs reddit
Well the physical Art Market is the most favorite target for money laundering so you can see why art works have so much value. Crptyocurrency is already a unregulated market, NFTs are just making a volatile market even more volatile and nothing else.
Beeple is very talented and you can appreciate his art and the work and emotions he put in to it, but a fucking Minecraft zombie ain't it
69 Mill for that tho?
@@luan4753 yeah I guess your kinda right, but any body can make a 16x16 pixel zombie, but not everyone can make a collage of amazing artworks
Loving the return of sidemen debates
Sir Tim Berners Lee, is a legend. He may only be worth $10M, but that's just because of how generous and how visionary this man is. The NFT's profits went to charity. He also made sure his creation the World Wide Web remained free for all instead of monetising on it. Just be glad he was British and not American.
I think that's a crazy story, my dad tells me about it a lot. How he made and kept the WWW free. Imagine if he did Monetise it
It’s sad how rare this is
bruh why you gotta find a way to insult americans man? Just leave the last sentence out.
@@user-hq1pz9pc6u No
@@user-hq1pz9pc6u no
JJ” One of us will be buying an NFT soon”
In JJ mind “pls pls buy me crypto bunk”
English?
I tried getting into NFTs but then saw how toxic the communities are with tons of scam NFT projects.
and the people that send hate to the person into nfts like ksi.. All I see is fucking social rejects hating him for something he didn't know.. he doesn't know that NFT's are money laundering schemes
This was the most passionate I've ever seen JJ in a Reacts video 😂😂
Thank you sideman for posting after work. Hits the spot mate
Imagine getting arrested for robbery for taking a screenshot
KSI going down the NFT elitist road is so sad
COOLDEST SIDEMEN MOMENTS ua-cam.com/video/p5YFpv9ux7A/v-deo.html
Right??
Is so happy*
I mean if you were early, you could of bought a beeple for $1, or $900 and re sold for around $200,000. There's stil artists you can do this with today, just have to be there at the right time
he is an intellectual. u should try
bro 2 sidemen videos and 1 sidemen reacts all in 24hours life is good
I love how proud JJ looked at the end for getting the price right
@Pined° by SidemenRea.. shut up scammer
the sidemen should create nft’s, maybe 50-100 to sell off and each person that owns one are able to get full access to side+, a bottle of sidemen vodka, and whatever else.
either way you guys will make a profit for your pockets and you’ll have more traction as a whole. it’s a win win for the fans and yourselves.
COOLDEST SIDEMEN MOMENTS ua-cam.com/video/p5YFpv9ux7A/v-deo.html
NFT
NEVER
FELT
A TOUCH
You know JJ is so interested in the video when he doesn't yawn or fall asleep
The only video ever JJ is serious and not falling asleep
Bro JJ comparing an digital zombie that took probably 3 minutes to make to Mona Lisa created by Leonard da Vinci that took 4 years to make, a fucking artist and a believed scientific genius is so funny to me 😂😂😂
Why have i been watching so long these guys feel like family ?
i've been watching ksi for 10 years i feel super old
They just gettin straight to the videos from now on I like it
Wow nice to see a sidemenreacts video in which JJ is genuinely interested and partcipating
JJ always participates
jjs take about taking a picture of the mona lisa and owning it makes no sense. The mona lisa is a physical object and NFTs are virtual. If i were to screenshot your NFT that u own, i get all the benefits of having the image as you do. only thing i cant do is sell it.
I agree. What's the benefit of owning a wierd ass JPEG file spending thousands and millions on it. Its just for monetary gain cuz the art itself is trash.
But you dont get the benifits, there are many nfts that you have to own that give you access to games or exclusive discords and giveaways so just screenshotting it wont give you those benifits
@@christianhoy8447 but these benifits are not worth millions of dollars though.
@@GoodGuyBolt Exactly.
People don't buy NFTs to use them. It's an asset, a virtual one. So the only real benefit you get from them is that you can sell for a higher amount. And you can't, because yours isn't an original. So you lose the only one benefit that they have. Therefore screenshoting it does nothing other than if you wanna use the actual art itself
NFT being compared to art is not correct, lets you replicate the mona lisa, what you can't replicate is the brush strokes used by da vinci or the actual brush or oils used and the age of the canvas.
It's not about how you replicate them, it's about how you won't be able to sell them.
Screenshotting an NFT and thinking you'll make money is like printing the Mona Lisa and thinking you'll get rich.
Both are dumb.
I liked Josh's conversation and questions more than the video itself :D
The movement from cars to art probably has more to do with acquiring depreciating to appreciating assets.
NFTS is really showing us how Human Society is evolving backwards, they're only good if you're making a financial investment 💀💀💀💀
Aren’t stocks, Bonds, and Index funds also for investments? Lmao acting as if making money is wrong
But how is that evolving backwards? making investments for future digital valued art is risky but well paid off if succeded. If you already have bank, i suggest taking the risk.
This is the most I’ve ever learned in a Sidemen video
COOLDEST SIDEMEN MOMENTS ua-cam.com/video/p5YFpv9ux7A/v-deo.html
KSI goes hard this video, feel free to screen record
It's about power, we stay hungry
I love tobi's background setup
big up Vik bro he's been killing it lately
I agree but you haven't even seen the video
REALLY
ua-cam.com/video/pFWy3o9TybY/v-deo.html
Q
Q
nah hes a nerd
NFTs probably wouldn't be such a big issue if
1. They weren't mostly ran through Ethereum, which is the most energy-costly cryptocurrency available (I believe it uses more power than the average American household in a year? Correct me if I'm wrong, but, regardless. Dogecoin can run on some triple-A batteries for crying out loud.)
2. There was actual art involved. Like, seriously, there's nothing appealing about an ugly-looking monkey in a style that can only be described as a 12 year-old drawing in the Gorillaz style from memory.
3. Cryptobros like JJ weren't so damn annoying
and 4. People understood the freedoms of the internet. Yes, if you post your NFT in a public space where people can, in-fact, right-click > save as, then yes, people have every right in the world to right-click > save as and you can't complain because it was your own irresponsibility. Imagine getting upset about your house being robbed when you leave the keys in the open on the doorstep with a UA-cam thumbnail-esque arrow on a sign pointed at them saying "Free keys!"
nah the last point is dumb... you still hold the chain.. you can right click all you want
5:57 when the homies don't let you speak so you give up
I can never get home fast enough to watch these tysm
This is where the "KNOWLEDGE" comes into play...
c'mon just leave him alone.. He doesn't know yet about the flaws of nfts..
Spent my whole day upset but I knew the sidemen would make me feel better
ignore these fkn bots hope you feeling better bro
First time in a long time a thumbnail wasn't misleading...the amount shown in it was actually mentioned in the video...thank goodness
I watched the corridor video about nft's where they spoke with beeple and apparently they are really bad for the environment
i have never had less hope in humanity
Jj was going on the whole video showing how much he knows about NFT s and blockchain, but I am 100% sure that if you asked him what blockchain is or to simply explain it he would have a panic attack.....
11:00 JJ casually snorting some glue
NFTs be making round the headlines! A video on Boxmining gave a detailed explanations about NFTs.
Being raging about the screenshot joke is so funny, because it’s the realisation that there is no real world value and your just waiting for the next sucker to buy it off you 😭
‘Real world value’ in the next 20 years we’ll be living in the internet.
Conclusion from this video : NFTs are really stupid and pointless.
The banter that goes on in these video is entertaining to watch. Pls dont stop the banter randomly. Like this comment so that they can see this
I love how little time Toby is giving this!!
Vik's energy in these recent videos are great.
I'm fully with Josh here. I still don't understand what and why 😂
Love it when sidemen reacting video like this👍
7:52 Tobi just turned into a country boy for a sec
KSI tryna convince himself NFTs are good
JJ is the worst financial advisor I swear, NFTs and Crypto is a myth for money laundering
Nfts maybe, crypto no. Not if you know your shit
In this video JJ sounds like someone in a pyramid scheme trying to convince his friends to get in under him
Vik has gotten so much funnier in some of the latest video
I can’t wait till people figure out the carbon neutral use cases of NFT tech that doesn’t involve useless art
The fact that JJ knows how big NFTs are going to get and everybody is trolling him I find halrious he’s gotta come back to this video one year later and show them🤣
Just like he did when he lost 8 Million in crypto
@@jakub9640 you lose some, you win some. Just as you're gaining nothing but a few pennies on interest, by keeping your money sat in a bank which is owned by the government :) KSI is the winner in the end.
@@ayshabee8603 cuz hes already rich he has the moeny and time to spend on NFTs. for people who are not rich it is a dumb idea. NFTs is a way for rich people to get richer.
@@prathvk6266 yup, just the gas fee is high enough to make me hesitant in going to the nft market.
@@yashburman7640 if you wanna sell as an artist go for tezos or any other platform, gas fees is a matter of cents
i actually really liked Josh and JJ discussing about NFTs, more so than the video
Id like to hear a podcast about this