Miles Davis Kind Of Blue: UHQR 45RPM Vs. MoFi 45RPM Vs. 33 UHQR + Unboxing
Вставка
- Опубліковано 1 вер 2022
- 33RPM Kind Of Blue UHQR Video: • UHQR Miles Davis Kind ...
If you want to support the Channel:
/ @michael45rpm
Miles Davis Kind of Blue meets Analogue Productions' UHQR, the pinnacle of high-quality vinyl!
Definitive limited run reissue Ultra High Quality Record!
45 RPM double LP release limited to 25,000 copies
Best-selling album in jazz history; mastered by Bernie Grundman from the original 3-track master tapes
Pressed at Quality Record Pressings using Clarity Vinyl®
Purest possible pressing and most visually stunning presentation and packaging!
Dream team of Davis, Adderley, Coltrane, Evans, Kelly, Chambers, Cobb make history
Legends have a way of sticking around. If there was ever an album awaiting a high-fidelity, custom-pressed vinyl treatment of the level you now hold in your hands, it is Miles Davis' Kind of Blue. The top-selling jazz album of all time, it has been lauded, entered into "Best Of" lists and Halls of Fame, and universally acknowledged as a landmark recording - a five-track masterpiece of melancholy mood and melody.
It continues to be one of the most listened-to and studied recordings of all time, a required primer for many young musicians, and one of the most transcendent pieces of music ever recorded. Davis played trumpet sublime with his ensemble sextet featuring pianist Bill Evans, drummer Jimmy Cobb, bassist Paul Chambers, and saxophonists John Coltrane and Julian "Cannonball" Adderley with Wynton Kelly playing piano on "Freddy the Freeloader."
Now Analogue Productions, the audiophile in-house reissue label of Acoustic Sounds, Inc., together with Quality Record Pressings, is putting Kind of Blue where it belongs: the Ultra High Quality Record (UHQR) pressed on Clarity Vinyl with attention paid to every single detail of every single record.
The 200-gram records will feature the same flat profile that helped to make the original UHQR so desirable. From the lead-in groove to the run-out groove, there is no pitch to the profile, allowing the customer's stylus to play truly perpendicular to the grooves from edge to center. Clarity Vinyl allows for the purest possible pressing and the most visually stunning presentation. Every UHQR will be hand inspected upon pressing completion, and only the truly flawless will be allowed to go to market. Each UHQR will be packaged in a deluxe box and will include a booklet detailing the entire process of making a UHQR along with a hand-signed certificate of inspection. This will be a truly deluxe, collectible product.
For this 45 RPM 2LP edition we've set the bar for excellence higher. Lifelike distinct detail that was palpable enough in 33 1/3 RPM is holographic at 45. Four glorious sides of 200-gram vinyl from QRP, the best presser in the business, reduces distortion and high frequency loss as the wider-spaced grooves let your stereo cartridge track more accurately. There's also a 20-page booklet with updated session photos and liner notes by Robert Palmer and Ashley Kahn. Plus, we've included photos of legendary mastering engineer Bernie Grundman's mastering notes from this release.
Kind of Blue is more than Miles Davis's most enduring recording, it's a testament to Miles' experimental approach, drastically simplifying modern jazz by returning to melody unlike the chord complexity more often heard at the time. "The music has gotten thick," Davis complained in a 1958 interview for The Jazz Review. "... There will be fewer chords but infinite possibilities as to what to do with them." Kind of Blue is, in a sense, all melody - and atmosphere.
None of the musicians had played any of the tunes before heading into the first of two recording sessions in early spring of 1959. In fact Miles had written out the settings for most of them only a few hours before the session. Miles also stuck to his old recording procedure of having virtually no rehearsal and only one take for each tune.
Miles remained proud of the album, performing at least two of its tracks - "So What" and "All Blues" - for years after, until his musical path took him in a different direction.
History was on the side of Kind of Blue; it was born in 1959, at the peak of the golden age of high-fidelity, featuring innovations in studio equipment (magnetic tape, high-quality condenser microphones), matched by advancements in home audio reproduction (long-player records - LPs; high-end turntables, and other stereo components). Kind of Blue also benefited from Miles' being signed to the leading major record company of the day - Columbia Records, a part of the CBS media conglomerate. Columbia had the means and wisdom to invest in cutting edge recording technology, and their own professional recording studio.
vinyl community chad kassem vinyl collection
The MoFI 45 Kind of Blue made my horn speakers play bass I never knew they had 😂 I moved on from it fast,
Great review - I’m so glad the difference is significant.
I don't really understand these complaints about changing sides more often! To me it's a testament to how lazy our society has gotten because of technology ( not that I'm dissing tech)! Like I've explained to someone, I play side one of a record, make a beverage, then play the other side! And I'm even more excited about hearing the rest of it! I think in my opinion that's the perfect way to listen to music! Listen 15-20 minutes, then take a breath , and go the rest! To me that little break between sides is invaluable!
its not about being lazy for me its about the flow of the music it can ruin the experience to some to each their own though
My new copy played perfectly quite without cleaning. I'm so happy with this release and your review is right-on!! Thank you Michael and of course Chad!
I’ve ordered my copy, can’t wait! I watched your videos and interviews with chad, and it was a no brainer. I live in Brisbane, Australia, so it was expensive as you can imagine. But I know it will sound incredible. Thanks for the great reviews, please keep it up 👍
I’ve loved this channel for so long, it’s based on technical know how and an exceptionally deep love of music.
Bravo, my friend.
This is such a great comparison of an absolutely wonderful album. Thanks for taking the time to analyse both pressings, Michael. It’s great to have some insight around these pressings.
Got mine yesterday. Sounds fantastic. Waited for the 45 and it was well worth the wait.
Keep up the good work!
I have both the 33 and the 45 UHQRs from Acoustic sounds. The 45 sounds a tiny bit better, but the 33 is still excellent. I'm happy that I live only two hours away from Salina, which is home to Acoustic Sounds, Analog Productions and Quality Record Pressings. I can literally place the order, make the trip, and come home to listen to my LPs. It's a long round-way trip, but it's possible.
So excited to receive mine. Thank you Michael, watched some of your interviews for this release with Chad and the panel for the 33 release.
So happy for all the buyers and also so happy for Acoustic Sounds. Enjoy the 45rpm goodness and have a great weekend everyone!
Your thorough & detailed reviews of records is excellent. Glad I discovered you recently.
Great job Michael. Just got mine today. I'll be pouring myself a glass of bourbon after work and getting lost in this amazing album.
I can’t wait for my copy to arrive . I skipped the 33 and waited for the 45rpm. Now I’m even more excited. Keep up the amazing videos and honest reviews.
I'm like you , skipped the 33 and waited for the 45. I ordered before seeing this video...now I'm stoked haha. So can't wait !!!
I can always count on you to keep it real. I have the 33 1/3 now I have to make a decision, a hard decision on if I want to get to 45 RPM. This video did not make it easy😂 but I do appreciate it. Keep them coming homeboy.👊🏾👍🏾
important album. Great review. I'm waiting for my copy. Thanks Michael
It's funny Michael, how i come across so many albums (not Audiophile), where this kind of thoughtfulness is in place, when it comes to the "package". I bought many "regular" releases, that just is so delightful to open, see, feel and then of course listening. It's incredible how MOFI have missed out on that subject?
It do Matters for many of us. Otherwise we could settle with a soundbar, streaming digital or something.
So thx for keeping pointing these things out.
Art and records goes hand in hand (period)!
✌️❤️🇩🇰
I should receive my copy next week with help from my ordering group, which I found through this channel :). This video has made me even more excited about receiving it. This will be my first UHQR and after watching, it seems I have made a good choice picking KoB for my first UHQR as well as going for the 45rpm version. Thanks for the video
You're going to love it! I've listened to mine a few times already - it's outstanding!
Again I view the attention to detail as you Michael. Some may not appreciate all the extra attention spent, I see it as complete respect & appreciation to their customers, Chad is the man!
Been waiting for this video
Hello Henricus,
I also.
And I found my validation.
What makes me happy. :-)
❤️Heike
I`m buying it !
A fantastic video from a great channel…..love it….thank you
Great review. I ordered it in your store this morning! Can’t wait. 😊
Just ordered mine! This is arguably the last time we'll get a 45RPM AAA release of this title.
I'm all in...just subscribed...smart, attentive, intelligent perspective (the value of quiet space and a subtle tonal recognition of Chamber's bass as a "warm"...
Welcome to the channel Norman
Looks amazing. Congratulations
Great Video! Awesome Job Michael!!! I like and Love 45RPM! 45RPM ALL DAY
wow thx :-)
Acoustic Sounds are knocking it out of the park. I think it’s great as I am sure MOFI will up their game. I am awaiting this pressing and watch this label with baited breath. 👍
Last year when I got my 33 it came with the jacket damaged at the inner fold or seam. I spoke to AS return person and said they should ship this box set with the disc outside the jacket. She said I needed to tell that to Chad. I left a message on his VM. So, you’re all welcome! 😉
Thanks Michael, looking forward to my UHQR 45rpm. Already have the UHQR 33rpn and the Original. Your videos are so eloquent.
I have: the original Classic LP, MoFi, 6-Eye; Mosaic LP; RSD RTI mono; and a UK pressing. A few months ago my group did our own blind listening session. We all agreed, in this order: 1) First Classic LP; 2) second Classic LP; 3) 33 1/3 UHQR; 4) MoFi. While our assessments of the first three were close, the MoFi was a distant fourth. BTW, one member of our group is a jazz bassist. Got the 45 UHQR yesterday, looking forward to it.
Amos, Are you saying the original Classic LP beats the original 6-Eye pressing in the blind test?
It's funny...the first three in the results all come from the same Bernie Grundman mastertape....and I also have the first, 2LP Classic Records pressing and love the alternate take at 45RPM as well !
I think you are right. In my opinion.
@@TL3721 Yes it is better than the original
Hi Michael... A great video sir many thanks and....... Good luck with your great channel 👍👍👍👍👍
I have an original pressing of Kind Of Blue ... which I bought in the early seventies ... YES! ... you correctly identify the "issues" with it ... But ... I have learned to live with it, and love it!
I also have a number of "better" versions ... But I still love the sound of the original ( probably for nostalgic reasons! )
Nice video Michael. Is nice you received yours. This time I am buying through a brick & mortar store and the retail channels receive it less faster as I understood. 🤷🏻♂️ Can’t wait to make my own conparison between the two. 👍
I'll receive my copy next week. I have the 33 rpm UHQR and it sounds great. I'm so looking forward to the 45 rpm.
Hi Michael, I love your informative and entertaining videos. I also appreciate how you encourage polite feedback. In that spirit I would like to respectfully suggest that presenting the choice between the new 45rpm and 33rpm UHQR versions of KOB as coming down to *sound quality* versus *convenience* is misleading. I generally prefer 33rpm versions of classic albums not because of *convenience* but because they offer a listening experience consistent with what the artist had in mind when they created the album. When Miles recorded KOB and decided on the track sequencing for it he did this based on a single album in the 33rpm format not as a double album in the 45rpm format. I want to hear KOB as Miles intended it to be heard and in the format that established its reputation as one of the greatest albums of all time. I respect your opinion that the UHQR 45rpm version sounds better and I am planning to buy that as well but for me it is not just about sound quality. I think the choice should be presented as the 45rpm UHQR offers the *ultimate in sound quality* versus the 33rpm UHQR KOB offering *a listening experience consistent with what the artist intended whilst still sounding great* Best wishes to you and keep up the good work!
another GREAT video. thanks mike45. looking forward to more EXCELLENT content in the near future.
I'm glad AP put out the KOB 45rpm because my 33 1/3 version got scratched. I don't know how it happened, maybe during cleaning.
I bought the 33rpm UHQR but I knew if the 45rpm came out I will also get it. I received my copy yesterday afternoon.
How does the 45 rpm compare? Do you agree with Michael on his assessment of the 45 rpm over the 33 1/3 rpm?
Hi Michael - In 2013, after Mofi announced the upcoming release of the SACD and 45 of KOB I wrote them and asked about the source tape for the release. Surprisingly I got a personal response from Rob LoVerde. His exact words (copied from the email) were: "We are utilizing Mark Wilder's excellent 3-track to 2-track analog mix for our transfers." I have no idea if he neglected to mention the 4XDSD step or they weren't doing it yet. If they made a DSD copy of Wilder's analog copy then, aside from the presence of a digital step, it's two generations removed from the 3-track master that Grundman used for the Classic and Acoustic Sounds reissues.
!! bad ....
The biggest difference is they are two different mixes. The MoFi has one audible added step in that the three track tapes were mixed to analog tape. The Classics had the three track mixed directly to the cutting lathe. The differences are mostly in the mix and the mastering.
Am filled with joy. :-)
Now I an breathe.
How many times have you said 45RPM is better?
What have I done?
Of course I stuck to it!
And I'm happy with the 45UHQR.
And once again confirmed by you.
"GORGEOUS" and a killer. :-)
❤️Heike
Your good hearing and the additional information are also a killer.
So, I like to 😍🎼 watch your videos and also to the rear. :-)
Just starting the video now. My copy came in yesterday. I’ll listen today. I’m definitely interested in comparing it to the 33rpm. I’m probably going to keep both copies either way. Nice to have the option of not having to change the record as often when you have company over, eating dinner, etc.
I own 33 1/3 version's UHQR and Classic Record version. I can see that they've used the same metal master from the matrix numbers. For example CS8163-C on the second vinyl (side C) of the Classic Record, that became the side A of the UHQR version, The last "C" of CS8163-C was crossed out and "A" is engraved on the side A of UHQR disc.
What I don't know is how Analog Production created the 45rpm version from the 33 1/3 metal? Do they also have the 45 RPM metal too? I know they don't have the tape.
Nice one, Michael. Mine is arriving today.
great review as always i have the same experience i have all of those. That Eq bass hmmmm
I have the 33 and i’m happy with it.
Due To the high prices of living I have To make choises and skip on this 45rpm release.
Does the increase in fidelity and detail make up for not being able to listen to the album as originally pressed, as in not having to turn the record over every 12-15 minutes? Awaiting answer to place my order. I'm happy to do business with Analog Productions/AcousticSounds after your interview the other day. Thanks :)
1995 pressing is done from the same plate that the UHQR uses
Mine is still on a FedEx truck out for delivery😊
Nice comparison Michael. Glad to hear the POV on the 45 which is super cool. Always great to hear that there is a real value add of the 45 over the 33! While the UHQR IS tempting, I am on the lookout for a 1971 KoB on the Columbia "360" label since it combines the tube recording and fresher tape with solid state mastering....Maybe soon I will find a bargain copy when hunting for records. I hope you get the chance to compare this UHQR against the OG at some point. Take care!
I very much appreciate this review. I also learned a new German word: Rillen! (grooves!)
I am very excited about the 45rpm UHQR, should receive it in a few days.
Really nice and concise review of Kind of Blue! I love your ranking w/ MOFI being 7.5 and the UHQR 45rpm 10.5! That makes my mind up for sure!!!
His final number was 8… he also has it out for MoFi so take that as you will. Can’t we all just like what we like without bringing agendas? MoFi has a digital fingerprint on many albums post 2015. So what? (No pun intended). Move on. The same albums that sounded great FOR YEARS before June 2022 still sound great today. I’m not holding any grudges based on a company not being fully transparent with me. If I did, I wouldn’t be able to use most things because that’s what companies do. Anyway, this whole thing has gotten so old.
@@Groover71 I get that! If you watch my MOV video you’ll hear me talking about Mofi as well as the beautiful albums I’ve been getting from Music On Vinyl! They do it wonderful from the record to labels and packaging and no one will dissuade me from my ears and belief! I just made a “principle” decision that I won’t spend $150 for an album that has so many variants out there! Whether or not digital isn’t my make or break! I want the artist vision and that’s why I always seek out OG’s when they are available! I also believe everyone has gotten so bent out of shape they are taking the fun out of the hobby! I refuse to be like that as I still buy new albums for color variants to add some spice to my collection! Of course I have my “critical listening” records too but also enjoy my fun albums as well!
I'm a music first person as well. I love it all, but I don't put all my stock in sound quality, though it's nice. A revealing system makes all records pretty damn enjoyable, especially original pressings.
@@recordmanjohn I’m with you! I’m no “purist” so I have a few processors like DBX3BX and an really nice equalizer! I can shape the music I want to hear and add dynamic range in a relatively flat recording! After all isn’t it all about personal listening enjoyment?
I'm on the fence! 33 1/3 vs 45 I love the sound of 45rpm records when done right it will always sound better, but a good 33 1/3rpm has that convenience factor. I purchased the Kind of Blue 33 1/3 UHQR and told myself I didn't need the 45 so I didn't pre-order it. I found myself ordering the 45rpm version yesterday anyway. No self control 😂
Hello hatfieldow,
passion is the origin of every collection. :-)
❤️Heike
I just received my 45rpm Kind of Blue: Great Review Always M45: The 45rpm does sound good as the 33rpm. It sounds as what a 45rpm should. Not better than the 33.3 rpm, but as it should sound as a 45rpm. The 33.3 rpm sounds really good and I think that is the marketing genius? Of Chad K. at AcousticSounds. The 33.3rpm sounds so good that people were anticipating the 45rpm to sound even stellar and that, that was the best marketing genius of Chad K. Great job Chad! Kudos to you! The 45rpm does sound very good as it is an analogue production standard of excellence. Does it beat the 33.3rpm? NO it doesn’t. Should a 33.3rpm owner buy the 45rpm? Hell ya! A true audiophile must own the best! But the 33.3rpm is as good as it gets. They are both standards of excellence of their rpm. If I owned the 45rpm, I don’t think I would need to own the 33.3rpm. And vice versa. They both sound excellent! Great review again!
Honest review. That's what counts.
Great video!! Respectfully, wouldn't the most interesting 45 comparison for KOB be Classic's 4x1 sided set vs AP's 2 LP set? As they are from the same Grundman plates? Although I don't know if you have the Classic set..... I'm holding back buying as I have the Classic set.... Thank you.
Go all the way as with "A Love Supreme"; 1/4-inch 15 i.p.s. reel-to-reel. I agree with Chris Carson. I have the "Classic Records'" 'KOB' 45 r.p.m. (which I purchased from Acoustic Sounds back in the late 90's). The Sony Mastersound gold-CD has been replaced by MOFI's sacd. The vinyl is purely an investment. Bring on the SACD! (including the Steely Dan "Katy Lied"). Cheers.
One more thing, Michael. I'm looking forward to any UHQR "Steely Dan" albums (SACD also). I am still paying for my new 'Rhodes-mk8' electric piano. Steely Dan, (DoobieDan), Herbie Hancock, and Chick Corea are the reasons why I play the 'Rhodes'. Also, John Coltrane is why I play sax; Selmer (Paris) should be issuing the 'Model-22 Supreme' Tenor Sax this year. I'd prefer this horn over a "Mark-6" from 'Reverb. It is my opinion that audiophiles can afford their hobby. We are also musicians as well as nerds (and hoarders). I am proud of my Miles Davis SACD collection from "MOFI", but that did not stop me from collecting the Miles Davis SACDs from "Esoteric". Only the AP 'KOB' SACD could trump the MoFi. thanks
I'm still holding out for the 78rpm... 😁
I have the 33 UHQR and the 45 UHQR on the way... Happy days!
Sum them up. Becomes 78 rpm🤣
Hello Michael.
It would be interesting if you could graphically express your reflections on the sound quality of the different versions. That is to say, amplitude of sound, placement of the instruments... it would be a didactic complement to value.
It's just my humble contribution.
Greetings to the community!
I got the mofi KOB early on. I’m extremely familiar with KOB, and 2 things struck me about the mofi KOB. First, as michael suggests, the bass is overblown. Second KOB has never been the quietest album around, yet the mofi was notable for its quietness and I always wondered how they cut the noise level. Now I can attribute it to some digital manipulation.
Great video, really good review on a subject many are curious about: the battling UHQR pressings!
I'm thinking I might get the 33rpm on sale right now and not shell out the $150 for the 45RPM. The 33 is selling for $100 at the moment.
I have the mono 2013 cut at Sterling Sound, and pressed at RTI. Any thoughts about this one?
Just received mine today and I’m looking forward to giving it a listen. It’s only my 2nd (and likely last) copy of the record as I have the Kevin Gray mono version from a few years ago.
Ryan K Smith did the mono in 2013. Kevin did the 2010 stereo reissue.
@@AeroModule Yes, you are correct. It’s the 2013 RKS/Sterling Mono version I’m referring to. Thanks!
I agree wholeheartedly, 45 rpm in a much better sound. When I purchased my first 45 and put it on I was blown away at the difference! There were notes I didn’t hear on the 33. Totally worth the price.
Just a fantastic record.
Hello,
Please do a shoot-put with the original if you can, also, do you hear any distortion on Blue in Green? The third track? I do on this and the 33, but not on the MoFi, which has a bass-boost which is very unfortunate.
Another great video, thank you,
Nice one. I do have the Classic Records edition from 2001, 33 1/3 rpm, remastering by Bernie Grundman Mastering. It's new, never heard it. Just looked it up in my collection and didn't remember that I have got this version. Nice surprise! It will get an ultrasonic wash soon :-)
I have the UHQR 33 RPM version. I sold my old Mofi 45 version as soon as I heard the UHQR 33. I don't have the shelf space to keep records I know I won't play anymore.
My 33rpm UHQR came package outside of the sleeve so not sure this is a new thing with the 45rpm. Run Out Groove also package their releases this way, having learned from the amount of returned seem splits they ended up with.
I am a happy Miles Davis-fan for over half a century. I have been listening and buying his music in all physical forms, reading books and magazines and went to 11 of his performances: in 1984 saw him 3 times in one week. At that La Vilette-Paris concert the bell of his trumpet came to within 1/2 meter of me (there is a picture of that sublime moment, published in the French magazine Actuel). I am puzzled by your extensive interest in all this sonic detail. To me, it's like being interested in the brushes, cloth and the dyes that Picasso used. I am not, but if that's your thing, be my guest. Anyway, I've always wondered about is this: whatever vinyl-edition you have, inevitably, as there is physical contact between the diamond stylus and the plastic groove (that's the word ...) the more you play it, the more wear is caused. I can hear, pretty soon, the difference between a unplayed record and one that's been through the process, say, 20 times. I don't really care about that, but what are your thoughts on this ?
According to a post I read, "if you look at the Mofi info says they used "Dolby SR analog remix master" because that is only what was allowed by Sony to be available to them and this has everything to do with how the Mofi sounded and had nothing to do with EQ choices. Bernie Grundman with Classic records was allowed and able to get the actual analogue 3-track master tape in 1995 which Chad Kassem is using the metal parts as he says to make the Analogue Productions version. Bernie Grundman's equipment back then was able to take the 3-track feed directly to be remixed down to stereo at the lathe I believe because he had it modified to be able to do this. I believe it was Mark Wilder at Sony who created this "Dolby SR analog remix master" which Mofi was forced to use. So the real issue is Mofi is not just a copy but their version is totally affected by this Dolby SR technology."
I waited for the 45rpm. It was well worth the wait. I got number 473. Before this was not one of my favorite Miles Davis albums. I liked it and recommended it to many when I worked at a record store in the early 90’s. But I was attracted to Sketches of Spain and his dive into the late 60’s and early 70’s music. Bitches Brew was fantastic! Wow! I still haven’t cancelled my MOFI of the new up-coming Bitches Brew. I am sad though, because the lies and now knowing about the digital step. But man, I’m still curious to hear that. It’s such an iconic album. But anyways, it will probably be my last MOFI. This 45rpm UHQR Kind of Blue has made me dive in and become a fly in the original sessions. It’s now, my favorite Miles Davis record. What Bernie and Chad (and his wonderful employees) did was move it from a legendary performance to a spiritual journey. I’ve never heard an album like this before. I know my ears and my mind has grown since I started to listen to Kind of Blue. This time it was such a fresh experience. I can only imagine what these two could do to Jimi Hendrix’s “Electric Ladyland”. Yes, the price was more for this UHQR, but man the quality was unbelievable! This experience is the closest thing to time travel that I know. Chad has the market of time travel cornered. There is no one even close!
I understand the technical aspect and the "maybe better sound" of a 45rpm groove, but if you turn the record over every 10/15 minutes, the mood of listening goes down the drain. I would like to see Michael do a blind test between 33 and 45rpm! I love my 33 1/3. Gute Arbeit Michael
Not if your not lazy! I mean how long does it take to flip? 4, 5, 6 seconds? Small price to pay for added fidelity! I've played side 1 of 33 albums and took time to make coffee ☕, then played side 2! And I was even MORE charged up to finish it! But to each his/her own! P.S. not that I'm calling you lazy, my apologies if it sounds that way!
@@analoguecity3454 you are welcome!
I’m sticking with the 33 for this reason.
I look forward to hearing this version. The 1995 Classics had the 1. Original LP 2nd LP Side 1 corrected Speed and Alternative take Flamenco Sketches @45rpm
Discogs date is wrong, Bernie didn't cut the KOB lacquers until January of 1997, all the versions came after that.
@@derosa1989 right. I bought the Classics when it came out and couldn't remember the year. 1995 seemed early but thats what Discogs listed as release date.
Hello Michael,
thank you for this post. I have both UHQR versions and can only agree with you absolutely.
Many years ago I started collecting different versions/pressings from many countries. In the meantime there have actually been 117 different releases on vinyl. Yes, that seems crazy, pointless and/or exaggerated to many collectors. But so what! ;-) I have always enjoyed comparing and owning the issues. But maybe more on that later...
The 45 rpm pressing from Analogue Productions showed me once again how decisive the pressing at 45 rpm is for the sound. As you have already explained, the 45 rpm pressings simply have more space in the groove to store the so-called sound signals and pass them on to the needle of the pickup system.
I was pleasantly surprised by the first track "So What". I honestly said I didn't expect to hear such a significant difference. But that's how it is. I own a few 45 rpm pressings but have rarely heard such a big difference from the 33. The music is much more "airy" and has a lot of space. Miles' trumpet playing literally touched me. The two saxes play even more clearly and impressively than on the already very good 33 rpm pressing.
The 45 in connection with the clear vinyl and the really very (!) good press quality puts the 33 in the shade a bit. The better is just the enemy of the good.
I am glad that I own and can enjoy the 45s. Very good job Chad Kassem!
Best wishes for you and your shop. Stay healthy and happy!
Thomas from Hamburg
What I would be interested in is a comparison between the Classic Records 45 rpm version and the new UHQR 45 rpm version. We know that Classic Records had it's own proprietary vinyl formula and that the Analogue Productions releases use the same metal parts created by RTI. I have observed that when RTI pressings are compared to QRP pressings, the RTI pressings are better. Because the CR and AP 45 rpm versions use the same metal parts, the difference is who pressed them.
As a side note, I have the UHQR-0004 "Kind Of Blue" version already. As with many records pressed by QRP, I have to exchange them due to poor quality or return them altogether. I did have to exchange the UHQR-0004 record I originally received because of typical QRP problems like being off-center pressings, warped records and excess surface noise. It had all these issues. The replacement record I received had no problems. Because of my personal experience with QRP pressings, I know what to look out for.
I agree with you about the heavy handedness of the bass in the MOFI 45rpm Michael. It's simply out of control.
I can't wait to get my 45 rpm UHQR KOB to compare against my Classic Records 45 rpm - which I should add IS a 4 single-sided product and *THE BEST* I've heard to date! Even better than Chad’s previous and very fine sounding 33 1/3 rpm UHQR version which clearly had to be dropped to the #2 slot.
So I wonder if at the end this 4 single-sided / 45 rpm Classic Records edition will still beat the Analogue Productions UHQR edition?
Hmmm to be continued...
I have the 33 as UHQR and this one is wonderful. I like 33 releases, because you have time to fall in music before you awake for the next LP side. And the Artists once said, that it’s great to have so much time for a production on a 33 LP side. I own other pressings of Kind of blue, so the japanese Stereo from 2019? All of them have mistakes, witch I know since hearing the UHQR release. And all have a digital step, except the Classic Records.Get it and let it work for your ears and soul.
Hello Jörg,
you have a strong argument. :-)
❤️Heike
@@rastheike4329 ♥️
Can’t move from the 33 1/3 . It’s a matter of being extremely happy with it and funds need to be directed to other reissues . I have the mofi and the 33 definitely beat it on the natural aspects as you pointed out. Good review with that honesty that comes with your reviews.
I got my 2 copies of the record yesterday. 3 out of the 4 discs were warped. I emailed Acoustic Sounds and they will promptly send me replacements. 1st class service from Bud the manager. Do not worry if your copies are not perfect they will handle everything with great customer service.
sorry to hear that Peter ..
@@Michael45RPM thanks Michael, I just have to wait until next week to hear Flamenco Sketches and All Blues!
Unless you live overseas, then you have buy something else before a replacement is shipped.
@@jonathanmackenzie2570 no that’s not true. I had to show a picture of the destroyed discs and they shipped me new replacement discs.
@@Pinoynoir7 ah okay, I didn’t need to send my 33 back but I was meaning other AP albums that I have had issues with.
Michael.. I just posted a new video and linked this video of yours to the description. Since I could have added nothing to your evaluation here( really perfect), I will leave this to you!. Nobody has covered this more complete than you.. so why try?
I just talked about some stories about the recording.... Great job as always!--JG
Maybe I’m alone in this, sometimes I think my rig needs something; then I put a well recorded well mastered piece on and just grin like an idiot😊 I’m grinning
Well done that man, however, a Kind of Blue is such a good recording it will sound good no matter what the recording is. The 24 bit CD version sounds spectacular and it would sound good on the Flintstones turntable!🙂 Let's just enjoy it for what it is!😃
I received mine today! Didn’t Bernie also say he didn’t have to do a lot with the EQ with the Led Zeppelin tapes? You really don’t have to do much when it’s done right.
Thank you
Wasn't the uhqr a different master found in erourpe? I like it, but I compared 2 both Reel versions. The earlier 1959 7.5 sounds dark and natural and the 1962 repress on Reel 7.5ips sounds light and airy, also good. I compare the uhqr 33 more to the 2nd version of the Reel. Someone told me Reel formulas changed by the early 60s giving it a different sound.
The only real advantage of a 45 RPM is it’s ability to lessen inner groove distortion, that’s it. You gain that but also add louder surface noise because of the speed. Luckily the Clarity vinyl has very little surface noise nowadays.
You are wrong. You store more information within the groove independent of the location of the groove at 45 rpm vs 33 rpm. It’s simple physics.
I have the 7.5ips reel. kills both records.
For sure.Stoked for you. I almost had my hands on one for reasonable price but last second out bid. Maybe someday?
@@s.t.e.r.e.o. Try for a clean 1959 Reel than the later 62 reel press. Both reels sound different.
You could get an original mono which is at the correct speed. Alas a shootout still wouldn’t be possible because a new analogue mono redo isn’t possible as the tape is “gone”. Sony had to reconstruct it for the mono RSD
I have the UHQR 331/3 and the MoFi 45, also a late 70's very clean copy on the CBS label, which is actually very good. The 331/3 UHQR is so much better than the MoFi 45. I didn't intend to buy the 45 UHQR, but i've seen so many good reviews, i could not resist, so I ordered my copy on Sunday, can't wait to give it a spin.
Hello Michael man I’m very tempted to buy the 45rpm UHQR I have the 33 version I might pull the trigger I dig 45rpm records I have a nice amount like Kevin Gray45rpm ALS and Org Ballads 45 by Bernie and some Music Matters this was a great review the UHqr have been simply amazing the price is my only gripe you got really thinking brother loved it take care 🥁🥂.Lovellandrew
As Chad says…..”Buy now or cry later.”
@@mikewish19 yes that is true 😊
I believe on this very channel I've seen a video about "Fear of missing out." The 33.33 UHQR is fantastic. It's more important to enjoy the music than fret about degrees of perfection. I believe that, 100%, but I won't judge if you buy both. I did :).
„My sense is I will be able to pull out some audiophile talk (presence, air, space, soundstage) to justify the 45rpm experience, but at the end of the day in most situations I will be reaching for the Tidal file…“
My UHQR 33 came with the disc outside the jacket also.
Hello Michael!
Thanks for your videos: very informative!
I guess you ordered these from Analogue produtions. I can see that they charge almost $60 for shipping to France (similar as for Germany I suppose): is that including importation taxes or will these extra charges are coming on top of the total (in your experience)? Thank you!
Michael the speed difference on the original is very slight, I don’t think that’s a reason to not do a shootout with the original. The real reason is that this would be insanely expensive - this by itself is a very valid and legitimate reason!
Personally, the first thing I do with my UHQRs is stick the LP into the jacket where it belongs; I fix seam splits with packing tape, the jacket doesn't matter to me.
They will be announcing the 78 rpm 4 record set shortly! 😂
Thanks Michael. I know you're not attempting to push product, but your take on this made it easier to do what I wanted to do anyway. I slept on the 33, and now Discogs sellers are asking more than the MSRP of the new 45 for the sold out 33. So 45 it is.
yes it is
I have the 33 1/3 UHQR and the MOFI 45 and the UHQR is extremely better.
I did not buy the UHQR 45 yet. Oops $150.
A lot of MOFI/MFSL LPs have a lot of bass and I think that's a trademark.
For example, old MFSL AAA vinyls like Aja and Sticky Fingers have a lot of bass.
The recent AAA David Crosby If I Could Just Remember My Name has a lot of bass too.
Personally I think it depends on which album this extra bass is present on.
Kind of blue should certainly not have this extra bass and that is, in addition to the much better separation, one of the reasons why the UHQR is much better.
Your not the only mad one , I have mine on order 😬
Thank you for another "excellent" review.
Mr. Pete----------->
aging hippie