Before she responded I said to myself. Gough is a typical Trumper. Causing the problem, then acting like he didn't beg for them to show up. Thank goodness Walmsley is not participating in Gough's BS.
Gosh had no evidence to start with in defence of his clients that's why he is creating evidence by filing these motions so he can use them later to appeal.
The shear gall of the defense to say "this is what a public lynching looks like" in reference to protest outside the courthouse over the murder of an unarmed black man is astounding.
After said defendants did a lynching on video. But honestly the lawyers have nothing. They are just doing everything somewhat plausible to try for their defendants, even if it is just Fox News talking points.
You saved me the trouble of typing the same thing. I'm guessing the prosecutor was biting her tongue because a lesser person would have pointed out that the entire case was about three white men lynching a black man. Maybe he was baiting her and she didn't take the bait.
As a divorce and defense lawyer, this lawyer is the type that even other lawyers don't like. Repeatedly making arguments without merit undermines a lawyers credibility severely. There's a fine line between zealous advocacy and being this guy.
It all smells of making a mockery of the judicial system. Throwing everything at the board and seeing what sticks is not the point of American law or the constitution. Just because you can doesn't mean you should
@@profribasmat217 I wasn’t the foreman, but was on a murder case a couple years ago. Felt the same way about the group of jurors I was in. Some wanted to convict, but it just wasn’t proven. I insisted that we need to follow the law and not our feelings. Still charged with some of the lesser charges, but I would have carried a burden on my shoulders if we put a guy in prison for life.
Why do people believe so easily the fake media narratives? Why is it so easy for the establishment media to take a random case and make it "high profile," then fundamentally distort or lie about every basic fact, and have millions who reflexively believe their lies. The simple facts are these: >Crimes of theft/robbery from various cars and from a construction site in the area. >Guy fitting the description, who was caught on video wandering through the construction site, is seen in the neighborhood >People living in the neighborhood call the cops, but knowing it takes some time for cops to arrive follow the suspect >The citizens do not attempt to hold the suspect by force but they are armed. They are NOT threatening anyone simply by carrying arms and they are NOT pointing any weapons at the suspect. (Good reason to believe a criminal may be violent- and yes, we have prior video of Ahmaud violently resisting arrest with cops. Look it up.) >The suspect (who IS the guy they're looking for) rushes one of the guys following him (probably doesn't want to deal with cops) and TRIES TO TAKE HIS SHOTGUN BY FORCE. >The suspect gets shot and dies. If the suspect was white we wouldn't hear about this case due to the controlled media ignoring the massively disproportionate level of black-on-white crime (doesn't fit the narrative). And if the suspect was a sensible person, of any race, the whole thing would have boiled down to "uh, I'm not the guy you're looking for. You called the cops? Whatever, that's fine. (Cops arrive.) I'm not the guy you're looking for, officer. Sorry about the thefts and stuff but here's my information and good luck finding your thief." A sensible person would not get shot because a sensible person wouldn't try to disarm by force a concerned citizen who suspects they are responsible for a crime!
@@curiaregis9479 the police already told them a white couple are the ones who stole something. The property owner told them a white couple stole items. A black man does not have to stop and listen because a white man tells him to. A white man has no right to hold a man at gun point because he's black. Whatever happened with the police BEFORE this has nothing to do with this because he wasn't committing a crime and they aren't his masters.....I mean the police.
@@ambercolbert What the fuck is wrong with you people? It doesn't matter if he actually stole anything. It matters that he was caught on film and hence they correctly identified someone who was a suspect. Also, THERE WAS NO STOPPING HIM OR HOLDING HIM AT GUNPOINT! Why are you people so ridiculous! You have every right to follow someone you think has committed a crime, tracking them until the police come. They never touched Ahmaud- it was Ahmaud who attacked the guy with the shot gun! Do you idiots have eyes? This is on video! Why do you leftie idiots always make up these narratives that are completely refuted by the evidence? Seriously, what is wrong with you? THE BOTTOM LINE: AHMAUD WAS NOT KILLED FOR STEALING OR JOGGING OR ANYTHING ELSE, HE WAS KILLED FOR ATTEMPTING TO TAKE A MAN'S GUN BY FORCE. Was the guy who shot him within his legal rights to have a gun and follow Ahmaud? You're damn straight he was.
@@curiaregis9479 again he never stole anything according to their own testimony. He hit him with his truck and had blood on the side of his truck from hitting him. Where exactly is that legal?
Did he seriously call the demonstration a public lynching of the 21st century while trying defend a real public lynching in the 21st century? I'm beyond words at this point. If anything "Roddie" should file for mistrial on incompetent defense.
The most ironic statement of this trial: "This is what a 21st century lynch mob looks like" -- referring not to the Black man who was murdered, but to the White men who killed him.
If they did their job during jury selection, they would be sure that the jury would not use prejudice to effect their decisions. This is a pathetic reach.
The DA is absolutely correct- Gough set up the demonstration by stating something controversial in court and the demonstrators played right into it by showing up to protest his comments so Gough could then request a mistrial because of the demonstrations he basically created!
right!? Love this judge. He waits patiently for Gough to repeat himself ad nauseum...blah blah blah for days and then denys the motion in about 4 seconds once he is given a chance to speak.
It is amazing to me that a defense lawyer has the ability to argue in court that they should have a mistrial because people disagree and think that their client should go to prison because they're guilty of a crime
I’m almost convinced that he is doing this on purpose so the codefendants can motion for a mistrial on grounds of how incompetent his council is and how it is affecting the case of the other defendants.
I think you would mean a retrial on impotent lawyer, it’s actually too late to fire the lawyer or ask for a new one. So, if the defendant thinks his lawyer was terrible and is convicted, he can hire a new lawyer and submit a request for a retrial but the judge would have to accept
Haha... tick tock tick tock... i can't wait for the jury to find these thugs guilty... Rittenhouse Not Guilty - these guys guilty and all will be right with the world
@@BracaPhoto it must be something down south because this lawyer is pure trash trash I’m surprised the guilty idiots didn’t want to fight him after this clown show
From what I've heard so far in thistrial it's a clear of self defense, had Arbury not have attacked the man first he would not of shot him and he would still be alive, and it's also clear there is a witch hunt on any white man who kills a black man even when it's self defense
Too bad he doesn’t work this hard to defend his client like he does to keep black ppl away from the courthouse. If Roddie was smart he’d file a motion for ineffective counsel. What a 🤡🤡🤡 … poor judge I know he can’t wait for this trial to be over… defense are pushing their clients to the prison cell even faster than they’re going.
Their nothing he can do for his client because it all on tape. Bryan told cops he used his vehicle to Block Arbery. It doesn't come any clearer than that. So when the judge reads the definition of citizens arrest to the jurors Their goose is cook.
Oh, I think ineffective counsel is gonna be at the top of the list, when appeals roll around.. lol.. This guy Geogh released the video, which is legal malpractice, IMO..
Let me be clear, I know the defense really doesn’t have a case here but I watch a lot of trials and if the defense is a good team they will attempt loopholes every chance they can. This dude really has said nothing other than complaining about the black ppl at the courthouse. Honestly had he had his client testify, he may have been the only one that could sway the jury a little and get some sympathy for match the lesser charge. The other two POSs have zero chance. Just seems like they have no plan and aren’t even trying to me.
I assure you. This Brunswick bubba is no John Kennedy....not even close...either one of them. Cletus has provoked the very response he complained about. Gough is desperate for a mistrial & just running up a bill Roddy will NEVER pay back.
He's already lost. His method is now to rile up right leaning people to gain support on appeals. It's why he keeps using trigger words. It's been the plan the entire time.
Clearly people don’t understand what a public lynching is, UA-cam has documentaries on public lynching or should we use public execution, yet every person from Georgia in this area knows that area is racist, I haven’t been home in 12 years I’m here to say all these people in power in this area are related period and their in position to keep the ball rolling. Look up unsolve murders in that area and people will sing a different story
The judge really wants to tell this man off but he isn’t like the rottenhouse judge. He has patience and class and realizes this isn’t about him so he isn’t trying to be center stage, just trying to be a good judge. Thank you for that sir!
The prosecutor in the Rittenhouse case was making illegal moves so many times in the trial, that’s why the Judge got uptight with him. He literally told him he made a serious constitutional violation at one point and yet let him ultimately continue. You’re too libtarded to get it.
@@thegalacticprincess2322 What's HILARIOUS is the response somebody is for lack of a better word "retarded" for how they viewed a trial is being judged by an idiot who probably thinks the insurrection was a patriotic event with a just cause. Can we say "irony" people. 🤣🤣🤣
@@dissemination_1414 whats funny is how the judge wouldn't allow any character evidence in this case, to show what a like magatard rottenhouse was. He got his free kills, and im sure you'll worship a man so tough, he needed an AR to deal with a person that was 5 foot 3.
AMEN! Hes creating conflict by just opening his mouth! He indicated there is inherint predijuce, and He is the main source of it for thinking there is conspiracies in every corner, behind every door. wholly support he should be investigated for trying in any and every avenue to cause a mistrial!
If he doesn't like the people that show up to protest vigilante justice he shouldn't have taken this case. I'm sick of of this "mistrial" crap. The judge already ruled, reprimanded and warned council not to bring it up again...twice.
Love this Judge. Fair and righteous! No MISTRIAL. The State lawyer is brilliant and insightful. Justice is in progress. Get back to the facts of the case and thank God the Defense layer is denied the mistrial.
How is this fair though? Bringing in race baiters for an issue that wasn't racial is grounds for mistrial. Unless you got videos where either defendant said get that n***r or anything showing racial prejudice, than the prosecution sank their own case either here or on appeal.
@@dustinmooring698 Don't believe all the lies that Fox News tells you. He was wearing sneakers, Nike to be exact. That was discussed in this very trial. They were covered in blood.
@@dustinmooring698 so after Travis murders Ahmad he stands over his dead body and called him a fkn n word. Look at the video of the GBI agent giving his testimony.
Did he really just try to liken the crowd outside to a "public lynching" after what his client and his buddies did?!? Seriously?!? Man I swear there is zero insight or self-awareness in that "man"....
This man is killing his law firm and he doesn't even realize it even with the obvious lost he still would have gained business just because the case is high profile but at this point I'd be surprised if he ever gets another client.
@@bryonkidder6199 yeah but he's killing his business this isn't good lawyer work it's desperation look at Kyle Rittenhouse team they smoked the prosecution and got him a not guilty verdict
@@triple6698 Rottenhouse got a Grand Wizard for a Judge and got away with murdering two people. The kid that almost got his arm blown off should've used his gun and not just pointed it at that lil' POS! He'd still have his arm and Rottenhouse would be where he belongs...lol
There's black pastors in the courtroom, we motion for a mistrial. The printer ain't working, we motion for a mistrial There's people outside the courtroom, we motion for a mistrial The prosecution is destroying my case, we motion for a mistrial I forgot to eat breakfast, we motion for a mistrial
Her saying that was a master stroke ... Now she is a top lawyer but she don't need to be to out lawyer Mr Gough... He is a 🤡 he just needs the red nose and red make up on his cheeks.
I think he is auditioning for Newsmax or OAN. Showing what a warrior he is against the "Woke Left" I think the problem is that he come off as a whiney complainer not a tough guy.
He will absolutely be on TV after this. This is all a performance. Because, honestly, the argument "the jury can see the gallery, therefore mistrial." is the most insane thing I've heard a lawyer argue in quite awhile.
Definitions are important. So are newly-invented words by THE RIGHT WING. WOKE: Defines “the person” who videotapes and posts racist behavior to social media (and cops/employers). Right Wing racists got away with their behavior for centuries until the advent of the “phone-video/camera.” CANCELLED: Re-defines the phrase, “Getting the consequences for one’s poor behavior.” Getting fired by your employer after they see deplorable and racist behavior is legal. But the far Right don’t abide. Before cell phone video cameras, White Supremacists (and Karens) were literally getting no consequences for their repeated deplorable and illegal behavior. Now, FOXNEWS and the Right are upset that the evidence of racist’s behavior is being posted and these evil people are losing their jobs.
This Judge has made it quite clear that NO ONE is in control of that court room but him and God PERIOD as he once again denied the request for a mistrial. The defense knows that a mistrial is the only way to try and get those disgusting murder's off the hook but the judge isn't having it.👨🏼⚖
Your honor my clients is guilty af and there is no evidence showing they are innocent, so I want a mistrial! Bc I never had a shot at winning!!! SMH these lawyers are trash🤣🤣🤣!
Is she anticipating an appeal based on ineffective assistance and trying to preemptively undermine it by calling him "brilliant"? That's the only reason I could think of to use that word in relation to this man.
He just tried the 1st ever "criminal defense filibuster". The only thing that's mistrial worthy is the fact that the defense is too business defending their clients image, instead of coming with an actual defense. Shameful
It's shocking in our society what people argue makes a trial unfair for people of means versus unfair to everyone else these criminals were a breath away from not being charged at all what's unfair is a black man in the middle of the day jogging in g clothes can immediately be assumed to be a criminal and a random person can deprive them of their civil rights thats unfair running down an innocent man with shotguns and the men with guns get the benefit of the doubt is unfair
"There are not people outside with pitchforks or baseball bats." = "Public, please come with baseball bats and maybe not pitchforks but AR-25's, so things will heat up so much that violence will erupt and I'll have better grounds for a mistrial or appeal."
Defense: we move for a motion for mistrial because blah blah blah blah blah blah……….Black people…blah…blah… Judge: Thinks about his lunch order or something else while defense is talking Defense: blah…blah…Thank you your honor Judge: Motion Denied!!
So, what did Ahmaud Arbery do illegal to warrant the death penalty? Why is the defense attorney talking about the environment surrounding the court? What relevance does that have with the men killing an unarmed jogger? The defense attorney seems to be intent on distracting the jury and the Court with outside factors rather than trying to defend the defendants actions. Did they kill that man? Why did they kill that man? Is there a law prohibiting men from shooting an unarmed man unprovoked?
This is wack lol “judge the jury is going to think my clients are guilty because of this mob and not because of the evidence that was given to them throughout the trial” 🤣🤣🤣
Idk what gets me the most the glare over the judges glasses or the look of pure desperation across Roddy’s face every time Gough stands up and asks for a mistrial 😩
‘Oh no there is a black pastor in the courtroom, that seriously affects my clients right to a fair trial.’ Meanwhile their clients were perfectly happy to gun down a black man who was never offered the opportunity to have a trial in the first place.
Amazing how these killers are being touted as the victims. Of a public lynching no less. Exactly what they really did to the actual victim. Guilty..or justice does not exist in America.
The defense attorney sees the writing on the wall for his client so he is bringing this to the court to put on the record to appeal the verdict! What a 🤡
Lawyer: Black people are scaring us. We motion for mistrial Judge: Denied. People can protest Lawyer: We have mobs of black people threatening to lynch us. We want mistrial Judge: Denied. You have not put evidence which suggest such Lawyer: We have black peoples in audience who could influence the court. We want mistrial Judge: Denied. People are allowed to sit in. Lawyer: We can’t prove these men not guilty. We want mistrial Judge: Denied. Lawyer: We saw black birds flying upside down. We demand mistrial Judge: Denied Lawyer: The black juror is biased. We move for mistrial Judge: Denied Lawyer: We think you’re biased for not agreeing with fellow whites. You are a traitor to your kind. Judge: Finally you say the truth. And? Lawyer: And we move for mistrial Judge: There it is, denied
Unless all those pastors kick the court room doors open and go in there and are trying to take over the court. I’m not trying to here any of the bs he’s spilling.
I said from the moment I heard Geoff spout off ab black pastors either he was a dufus or setting up for the current circumstance so he could use it for another mistrial effort or to be used in future appeals.
Every reason he has given for mistrial seems to be "I see black people."
He isn't used to seeing black people. He said it in the first mistrial request.
😆 right
lmaoooo literally!!!
😅🤣😂😅🤣😂
Black people watching is definitely grounds for mistrial. It is known.
There goes Kevin Gough again, begging for a mistrial, because he knows he is losing the case, and all three of these criminals, are going to prison.
Before she responded I said to myself. Gough is a typical Trumper. Causing the problem, then acting like he didn't beg for them to show up. Thank goodness Walmsley is not participating in Gough's BS.
“Karen” Gough is more like it.
not losing, LOST
@@KT-bd5ym Right On!!👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾👍🏾
Gosh had no evidence to start with in defence of his clients that's why he is creating evidence by filing these motions so he can use them later to appeal.
The shear gall of the defense to say "this is what a public lynching looks like" in reference to protest outside the courthouse over the murder of an unarmed black man is astounding.
After said defendants did a lynching on video. But honestly the lawyers have nothing. They are just doing everything somewhat plausible to try for their defendants, even if it is just Fox News talking points.
The utter irony is just insane. Of all cases, you use the term “public lynching” for THIS case? My jaw dropped.
He wants Blacks to be seen as aggressive agyer white people have gotten away with lynching
ASTOUNDING.
You saved me the trouble of typing the same thing. I'm guessing the prosecutor was biting her tongue because a lesser person would have pointed out that the entire case was about three white men lynching a black man.
Maybe he was baiting her and she didn't take the bait.
As a divorce and defense lawyer, this lawyer is the type that even other lawyers don't like. Repeatedly making arguments without merit undermines a lawyers credibility severely. There's a fine line between zealous advocacy and being this guy.
I was wondering what other attorneys might be thinking about Gough and his tactics.
Yes, I agree. but he is so quirky and annoying, he just may succeed by confusing the jury and getting on the nerves of the judge.
as a law student i don’t want to be a prosecutor but i would rather be a lawyer like her than a lawyer like goff
It all smells of making a mockery of the judicial system. Throwing everything at the board and seeing what sticks is not the point of American law or the constitution. Just because you can doesn't mean you should
If he is going for complete Dick, he is nailing it!
He was so busy keeping up with outside the courthouse that he totally forgot his job inside the courtroom. Bye roddy. 👋
Correct!!😯🥺🥺 I saw his Attorney behavior before, and immediately knew.. 😳😳😳⛈️⛈️⛈️
Exactly 💯
lol
My Cousin Vinnie!
LOL
Why does he think a demonstration means a mistrial? Those people have nothing to do with the evidence or what’s happening inside the courtroom.
C'mon now!!!
He doesnt hes pissing in the wind.
@@profribasmat217 thanks for your good service! (not sarcasm fyi)
@@profribasmat217 I wasn’t the foreman, but was on a murder case a couple years ago. Felt the same way about the group of jurors I was in. Some wanted to convict, but it just wasn’t proven. I insisted that we need to follow the law and not our feelings. Still charged with some of the lesser charges, but I would have carried a burden on my shoulders if we put a guy in prison for life.
They had no case there defense witnesses were Travis and then like 4 strangers from a Facebook group.
if his clients didn't want to feel prejudiced against, they might want to try not filming themselves lynching a black man for the crime of jogging
Why do people believe so easily the fake media narratives? Why is it so easy for the establishment media to take a random case and make it "high profile," then fundamentally distort or lie about every basic fact, and have millions who reflexively believe their lies. The simple facts are these:
>Crimes of theft/robbery from various cars and from a construction site in the area.
>Guy fitting the description, who was caught on video wandering through the construction site, is seen in the neighborhood
>People living in the neighborhood call the cops, but knowing it takes some time for cops to arrive follow the suspect
>The citizens do not attempt to hold the suspect by force but they are armed. They are NOT threatening anyone simply by carrying arms and they are NOT pointing any weapons at the suspect. (Good reason to believe a criminal may be violent- and yes, we have prior video of Ahmaud violently resisting arrest with cops. Look it up.)
>The suspect (who IS the guy they're looking for) rushes one of the guys following him (probably doesn't want to deal with cops) and TRIES TO TAKE HIS SHOTGUN BY FORCE.
>The suspect gets shot and dies.
If the suspect was white we wouldn't hear about this case due to the controlled media ignoring the massively disproportionate level of black-on-white crime (doesn't fit the narrative). And if the suspect was a sensible person, of any race, the whole thing would have boiled down to "uh, I'm not the guy you're looking for. You called the cops? Whatever, that's fine. (Cops arrive.) I'm not the guy you're looking for, officer. Sorry about the thefts and stuff but here's my information and good luck finding your thief." A sensible person would not get shot because a sensible person wouldn't try to disarm by force a concerned citizen who suspects they are responsible for a crime!
@@curiaregis9479 the police already told them a white couple are the ones who stole something. The property owner told them a white couple stole items. A black man does not have to stop and listen because a white man tells him to. A white man has no right to hold a man at gun point because he's black. Whatever happened with the police BEFORE this has nothing to do with this because he wasn't committing a crime and they aren't his masters.....I mean the police.
@@curiaregis9479 Nice story
@@ambercolbert What the fuck is wrong with you people? It doesn't matter if he actually stole anything. It matters that he was caught on film and hence they correctly identified someone who was a suspect.
Also, THERE WAS NO STOPPING HIM OR HOLDING HIM AT GUNPOINT!
Why are you people so ridiculous! You have every right to follow someone you think has committed a crime, tracking them until the police come. They never touched Ahmaud- it was Ahmaud who attacked the guy with the shot gun!
Do you idiots have eyes? This is on video!
Why do you leftie idiots always make up these narratives that are completely refuted by the evidence? Seriously, what is wrong with you?
THE BOTTOM LINE: AHMAUD WAS NOT KILLED FOR STEALING OR JOGGING OR ANYTHING ELSE, HE WAS KILLED FOR ATTEMPTING TO TAKE A MAN'S GUN BY FORCE.
Was the guy who shot him within his legal rights to have a gun and follow Ahmaud? You're damn straight he was.
@@curiaregis9479 again he never stole anything according to their own testimony. He hit him with his truck and had blood on the side of his truck from hitting him. Where exactly is that legal?
This is like the 10th mistrial that he's asked for during the course of this trial.
He is clutching at straws. They are guilty as f..k.
this is what defense attorneys do. when they're all found guilty he'll ask for another mistrial then
They demonstrating.... file a mistrial 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏼♂️🤦♂️🤦♀️...I dropped my sandwich...file a mistrial 🤦🏻♂️🤦🏼♂️😂😁😂
@@georgebusybee1497 🤣🤣🤣
slimer was NOT in the new Ghostbusters movie... mistrial!!!
Did he seriously call the demonstration a public lynching of the 21st century while trying defend a real public lynching in the 21st century? I'm beyond words at this point. If anything "Roddie" should file for mistrial on incompetent defense.
Best comment so far. 🥂
That's he helped him loose.
The most ironic statement of this trial: "This is what a 21st century lynch mob looks like" -- referring not to the Black man who was murdered, but to the White men who killed him.
If they did their job during jury selection, they would be sure that the jury would not use prejudice to effect their decisions. This is a pathetic reach.
Correct. The jury isn't stupid.
I just don't understand why the prosecutor don't say, "You have a lot of nerve you stacked the jury."
@Owen wow. Do u know what day that was said . I missed that. I believe it
They are just trying to throw anything they can against the wall because the guilty verdict is all but certain
@@Dianne615 She doesn't even have to say that. Everyone knows it.
This is the verbal flailing of a lawyer who knows he can't defend his client. Sad
Exactly 💯
Agreed lol 😂
Kind of ironic that a guy who said “we can’t have anymore BLACK pastors in here” is worried about prejudice.
That ain't same thing to him lol he thinks that's being "truthful "
Good point!
Trying to use prejudice to protect his clients from the consequences of their prejudice, it's a pathetic reach.
Can racism be more obvious?
As long as it is and stays OUTSIDE - it has nothing to do with INSIDE the Courtroom. People have a 1st Amendment Right to assemble.
@Owen WI?
Gogh doesn't think black people also have the 1st amendment rights. That's why he is quoting cases from 1852.
@Owen Don’t be so dramatic. I live in WI. It’s fine here.
@@marcilk7534 "It's fine here." You say that now ....... WI is going to be TEEMING with terrorists in 2022 and 2024. So will all purple states.
@@audreymuzingo933 I’m not worried. People in WI are generally more interested in sports, festivals, outdoor/nature activities than politics.
The DA is absolutely correct- Gough set up the demonstration by stating something controversial in court and the demonstrators played right into it by showing up to protest his comments so Gough could then request a mistrial because of the demonstrations he basically created!
He tried 😆 his own plan backfired in his face
On January 6th, congress did the right thing. Doesn't matter what's going on out there.
Maybe it was his strategy so a demonstration grants him a mistrial, but it is backfiring, lol.
And they fell for it hook, line and sinker for it (black pastor)
@Ken Swift the Messenger Oh good grief. All whites don't think that.
The defense lead attorney is a used car salesman, actually, that’s disrespectful to used car salesman.
gough is not the lead attorney….
Probably cause no one else would take the case lol 😂
"Perception is reality" that's what got these defendants in trouble
THAT’S A BINGGGGG-GGGOOOO!!
Facts!!!!!
@sandradube4456, interesting take.
Judge is thinking, if Gough would just shut up, and stop running his mouth just to hear himself, this trial would be over by now. Motion denied!
😁
He is trying to stop the flow of the evidence being put forth!
right!?
Love this judge. He waits patiently for Gough to repeat himself ad nauseum...blah blah blah for days and then denys the motion in about 4 seconds once he is given a chance to speak.
Oh, the friggin' IRONY that this lawyer files the mistrial based on "prejudice"
It is amazing to me that a defense lawyer has the ability to argue in court that they should have a mistrial because people disagree and think that their client should go to prison because they're guilty of a crime
It’s like a kid getting mad other kids are picking on them except a million times worse 💀
Very Trumpian of them. Typical
The emphasis he puts on the word black... Just wow 😳😳😳
I just said that… omG why does he keep saying BLACK like that 🤦🏾♀️😒🤣🤣🤣
Bingo. It’s very telling.
You talk about fairness what about the fairness for Ahmaud Aubrey's life
It’s almost embarrassing how he won’t let it go
I’m almost convinced that he is doing this on purpose so the codefendants can motion for a mistrial on grounds of how incompetent his council is and how it is affecting the case of the other defendants.
I think you would mean a retrial on impotent lawyer, it’s actually too late to fire the lawyer or ask for a new one. So, if the defendant thinks his lawyer was terrible and is convicted, he can hire a new lawyer and submit a request for a retrial but the judge would have to accept
@@yolandapaulino5952 Yup, and they could be in prison a year, two years, etc. before that would happen.
In other words, Gough doesn’t want to be bothered with developing closing arguments for his client who is clearly guilty.
Haha... tick tock tick tock... i can't wait for the jury to find these thugs guilty...
Rittenhouse Not Guilty - these guys guilty and all will be right with the world
@@BracaPhoto it must be something down south because this lawyer is pure trash trash I’m surprised the guilty idiots didn’t want to fight him after this clown show
From what I've heard so far in thistrial it's a clear of self defense, had Arbury not have attacked the man first he would not of shot him and he would still be alive, and it's also clear there is a witch hunt on any white man who kills a black man even when it's self defense
@@rd9669 you might be right about lawyers here in the South...
I thought that Kurt Nurmy fellow was a complete idiot but he got Casey Anthony off...
@@BracaPhoto now she was clearly guilty
These defense attorneys are grasping at straws at this point. The desperation is obvious.
There house of cards fell down
Too bad he doesn’t work this hard to defend his client like he does to keep black ppl away from the courthouse. If Roddie was smart he’d file a motion for ineffective counsel. What a 🤡🤡🤡 … poor judge I know he can’t wait for this trial to be over… defense are pushing their clients to the prison cell even faster than they’re going.
It's all he's got...can't defend his client's actions, so...
@@chrisn8809 i believe his client is the only one that may have a chance but he sure isnt helping him
Their nothing he can do for his client because it all on tape. Bryan told cops he used his vehicle to Block Arbery. It doesn't come any clearer than that. So when the judge reads the definition of citizens arrest to the jurors Their goose is cook.
Oh, I think ineffective counsel is gonna be at the top of the list, when appeals roll around.. lol.. This guy Geogh released the video, which is legal malpractice, IMO..
Let me be clear, I know the defense really doesn’t have a case here but I watch a lot of trials and if the defense is a good team they will attempt loopholes every chance they can. This dude really has said nothing other than complaining about the black ppl at the courthouse. Honestly had he had his client testify, he may have been the only one that could sway the jury a little and get some sympathy for match the lesser charge. The other two POSs have zero chance. Just seems like they have no plan and aren’t even trying to me.
My prayer is Judge Walmsley is trusted by the jury.
Did he have the guts to call this a "public lynching" after what his clients did?
Yes. Yes he did. He is a lawyer. And a racist. He has no shame.
This guy is a joke. He probably thinks he's channeling LA senator kennedy.
I assure you. This Brunswick bubba is no John Kennedy....not even close...either one of them. Cletus has provoked the very response he complained about. Gough is desperate for a mistrial & just running up a bill Roddy will NEVER pay back.
He's already lost. His method is now to rile up right leaning people to gain support on appeals. It's why he keeps using trigger words. It's been the plan the entire time.
THIS!! All of this, it's so obvious.
Absolutley
A public lynching looks like what the defendants did to Arbrey and how they selected the jurors.
Was not a public lynching. Quit assuming the worst in people.
@@theropesofrenovation it was
Clearly people don’t understand what a public lynching is, UA-cam has documentaries on public lynching or should we use public execution, yet every person from Georgia in this area knows that area is racist, I haven’t been home in 12 years I’m here to say all these people in power in this area are related period and their in position to keep the ball rolling. Look up unsolve murders in that area and people will sing a different story
@@theropesofrenovation I am sure he just called AA "fucking nigger" out of companionship then?
The judge really wants to tell this man off but he isn’t like the rottenhouse judge. He has patience and class and realizes this isn’t about him so he isn’t trying to be center stage, just trying to be a good judge. Thank you for that sir!
The prosecutor in the Rittenhouse case was making illegal moves so many times in the trial, that’s why the Judge got uptight with him. He literally told him he made a serious constitutional violation at one point and yet let him ultimately continue.
You’re too libtarded to get it.
@@dissemination_1414 “libertarded” that’s the first lol. And it cringed me out
@@thegalacticprincess2322 What's HILARIOUS is the response somebody is for lack of a better word "retarded" for how they viewed a trial is being judged by an idiot who probably thinks the insurrection was a patriotic event with a just cause. Can we say "irony" people. 🤣🤣🤣
@@dissemination_1414 you're so lame
@@dissemination_1414 whats funny is how the judge wouldn't allow any character evidence in this case, to show what a like magatard rottenhouse was. He got his free kills, and im sure you'll worship a man so tough, he needed an AR to deal with a person that was 5 foot 3.
Tell me you don't have a case without telling me you don't have a case.
The ppl outside are praying for justice, like everyone in the country. 🙏
It would be better to do something based on actual reality.
Lawyer sees the guilty verdict already and wants a do over...lmao!
BAR Association needs to investigate this lawyer!
AMEN! Hes creating conflict by just opening his mouth! He indicated there is inherint predijuce, and He is the main source of it for thinking there is conspiracies in every corner, behind every door. wholly support he should be investigated for trying in any and every avenue to cause a mistrial!
that’s his job as a defense lawyer. even the prosecutor acknowledges it because she knows that that’s the job of a defense lawyer.
It's time to hold these Devils accountable, since the judicial system is broken
They going to jail
How would you hold these Devils accountable?
@Mikal Lowe do not respond to nine fifteen.
If he doesn't like the people that show up to protest vigilante justice he shouldn't have taken this case. I'm sick of of this "mistrial" crap. The judge already ruled, reprimanded and warned council not to bring it up again...twice.
The judge is really patient and I appreciate that he helped work through the non-sense and got a clear verdict.
Love this Judge. Fair and righteous! No MISTRIAL. The State lawyer is brilliant and insightful. Justice is in progress. Get back to the facts of the case and thank God the Defense layer is denied the mistrial.
How is this fair though? Bringing in race baiters for an issue that wasn't racial is grounds for mistrial. Unless you got videos where either defendant said get that n***r or anything showing racial prejudice, than the prosecution sank their own case either here or on appeal.
@@dustinmooring698 By race baiters you of course mean the three murderers who lynched a black man for running down the road, and their lawyers?
@@boskee I've never met anyone that jogs in tims though 🤔
@@dustinmooring698 Don't believe all the lies that Fox News tells you. He was wearing sneakers, Nike to be exact. That was discussed in this very trial. They were covered in blood.
@@dustinmooring698 so after Travis murders Ahmad he stands over his dead body and called him a fkn n word. Look at the video of the GBI agent giving his testimony.
Did he really just try to liken the crowd outside to a "public lynching" after what his client and his buddies did?!? Seriously?!? Man I swear there is zero insight or self-awareness in that "man"....
Your honor, my printer is brand new, but still prints like shit. I move for a mistrial.
This man is killing his law firm and he doesn't even realize it even with the obvious lost he still would have gained business just because the case is high profile but at this point I'd be surprised if he ever gets another client.
Criminals love lawyers that will say and do anything to get them off...lol
@@bryonkidder6199 yeah but he's killing his business this isn't good lawyer work it's desperation look at Kyle Rittenhouse team they smoked the prosecution and got him a not guilty verdict
@@triple6698 Rottenhouse got a Grand Wizard for a Judge and got away with murdering two people. The kid that almost got his arm blown off should've used his gun and not just pointed it at that lil' POS! He'd still have his arm and Rottenhouse would be where he belongs...lol
Lord infamous!!
He is trying to get a mistrial bc there is no defense for the deeds of his client/clients.
There's black pastors in the courtroom, we motion for a mistrial.
The printer ain't working, we motion for a mistrial
There's people outside the courtroom, we motion for a mistrial
The prosecution is destroying my case, we motion for a mistrial
I forgot to eat breakfast, we motion for a mistrial
Public lynching? That's what your clients perpetrated.
Hardly.
“Mr. Gough is a brilliant lawyer”.
No he isn’t!
I am brilliant. (nope)
@@lostpony4885 😂😂
HE IS A MASTERFUL "MANIPULATOR"!
He’s not even a master at manipulating 🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️🤦🏾♀️
Her saying that was a master stroke ... Now she is a top lawyer but she don't need to be to out lawyer Mr Gough... He is a 🤡 he just needs the red nose and red make up on his cheeks.
I think he is auditioning for Newsmax or OAN. Showing what a warrior he is against the "Woke Left" I think the problem is that he come off as a whiney complainer not a tough guy.
He will absolutely be on TV after this. This is all a performance. Because, honestly, the argument "the jury can see the gallery, therefore mistrial." is the most insane thing I've heard a lawyer argue in quite awhile.
Definitions are important. So are newly-invented words by THE RIGHT WING.
WOKE: Defines “the person” who videotapes and posts racist behavior to social media (and cops/employers). Right Wing racists got away with their behavior for centuries until the advent of the “phone-video/camera.”
CANCELLED: Re-defines the phrase, “Getting the consequences for one’s poor behavior.” Getting fired by your employer after they see deplorable and racist behavior is legal. But the far Right don’t abide. Before cell phone video cameras, White Supremacists (and Karens) were literally getting no consequences for their repeated deplorable and illegal behavior. Now, FOXNEWS and the Right are upset that the evidence of racist’s behavior is being posted and these evil people are losing their jobs.
@@fredchester921 preach girl
This Judge has made it quite clear that NO ONE is in control of that court room but him and God PERIOD as he once again denied the request for a mistrial. The defense knows that a mistrial is the only way to try and get those disgusting murder's off the hook but the judge isn't having it.👨🏼⚖
Say That .... well said..!!! Thank you
Shut the hell up you and your fucking God
Yeah I don't see what imaginary sky daddy has to do with with this.
inherent prejudice is right… all three defendents and defendents attorneys are guilty as hell of that… but that is not cause for a mistrial
Defence lawyer included? Lol
Gough: "Your Honor..."
Everyone and Everything: "WTF NOW!!! 😤"
Was the picking of the jury prejudice? So we worried about prejudice now? Too funny.
@Jo Ol No body believes you, because you are trying to bait.
@@kenisgreen1 I believe
@Jo Ol you might be right 👌
@@kenisgreen1 probably the truth, this dudes only defense has been racist
Couldn't pick many blacks, I imagine, because you all have already made up your mind. You aren't or won't listen to the evidence.
Your honor my clients is guilty af and there is no evidence showing they are innocent, so I want a mistrial! Bc I never had a shot at winning!!! SMH these lawyers are trash🤣🤣🤣!
"We've got a t-shirt I can't read but I'm sure it's not flattering"
Where did this guy obtain his law degree?
Gough: And as for you, I don't know who you are but I'm sure you're a jerk.
Random person: Hey I just got here a few minutes ago, what's going on?
Walmart U
The most wicked defense lawyer I have ever come across
He's a bubbling fool‼️🙄
I think the Central Park 5 witch, Linda Farstein, might have him beat
Is she anticipating an appeal based on ineffective assistance and trying to preemptively undermine it by calling him "brilliant"? That's the only reason I could think of to use that word in relation to this man.
Then when he responded by saying out of all my years of being, an attorney, I've never once been called brilliant. I was like you don't say? 🤣
@@Catnipfumar right!! 😂🤣😂🤣
She is the one who is brilliant. That was a perfect example of a backhanded compliment. 😂😂😂
@@Catnipfumar 🤣🤣🤣🤣😂😂😂🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
The problem is an innocent man died for running in a neighborhood
He just tried the 1st ever "criminal defense filibuster". The only thing that's mistrial worthy is the fact that the defense is too business defending their clients image, instead of coming with an actual defense. Shameful
🤣
Judge Walsmley looks like he's thinking "dear god what other crap is he gonna try to use for a mistrial next?" 😂
Gough went off for 10 minutes; The Judge responded in 30 seconds...Thank you Judge!
The fact that these murderers did a modern day lynching of Arbury, for the lawyer to use that type of language is fucking disgusting.
It's shocking in our society what people argue makes a trial unfair for people of means versus unfair to everyone else these criminals were a breath away from not being charged at all what's unfair is a black man in the middle of the day jogging in g clothes can immediately be assumed to be a criminal and a random person can deprive them of their civil rights thats unfair running down an innocent man with shotguns and the men with guns get the benefit of the doubt is unfair
13:32 She read him like a book. 😂
What is Roddy Bryant taking notes for? His memoir?
Lmaooo I’ve been wondering the same exact thing. Probably playing Tic Tac Toe 🤦
Lol...
🤣🤣🤣🤣
I second Tic tac toe
Wondering the same thing 🤔
He asks for a mistrial daily
And don’t forget every hour of every day 😐🤦🏽♀️
"There are not people outside with pitchforks or baseball bats." = "Public, please come with baseball bats and maybe not pitchforks but AR-25's, so things will heat up so much that violence will erupt and I'll have better grounds for a mistrial or appeal."
Isn't that pressure always being attempted? How in the world can you completely rid that out of any trial
This case has been a wonderful study of Critical Race Theory.
Facts
Forbes is reporting Kevin Gough attempted to negotiate a last minute plea deal with prosecution & they told Cletus NO DEAL.
Grasping at straws again.
Defense: we move for a motion for mistrial because blah blah blah blah blah blah……….Black people…blah…blah…
Judge: Thinks about his lunch order or something else while defense is talking
Defense: blah…blah…Thank you your honor
Judge: Motion Denied!!
So, what did Ahmaud Arbery do illegal to warrant the death penalty? Why is the defense attorney talking about the environment surrounding the court? What relevance does that have with the men killing an unarmed jogger? The defense attorney seems to be intent on distracting the jury and the Court with outside factors rather than trying to defend the defendants actions. Did they kill that man? Why did they kill that man? Is there a law prohibiting men from shooting an unarmed man unprovoked?
This is wack lol “judge the jury is going to think my clients are guilty because of this mob and not because of the evidence that was given to them throughout the trial” 🤣🤣🤣
When he mentioned about the printer not being better I'm sure that he wanted to blame it on the BLACK ink on the white paper.
That judge let him run on and get it all out then said one sentence to include 'no mistrial' Lol
If this lawyer keep writing up papers for mistrial these men will been done served 5 yrs alone just sitting in those chairs
🤣
What the hell is he talkin bout Willis 🤦🏾♂️
Idk what gets me the most the glare over the judges glasses or the look of pure desperation across Roddy’s face every time Gough stands up and asks for a mistrial 😩
😅🤣😂😅🤣😂
Did he object to people having a "prayer wall against racism?" 🤣😂
The prosecutor nailed it!! There is a definite attempt on the part of that defence lawyer to anger people and stir up trouble. And it may work!!
This, this is what a public lynching looks like in the 21st-century? You have got to be kidding me!! 🤦🏾♀️
HE CALLED THE PASTORS A MOB HE WILL CALL THEM A GANG NEXT MAKES ME SICK
‘Oh no there is a black pastor in the courtroom, that seriously affects my clients right to a fair trial.’ Meanwhile their clients were perfectly happy to gun down a black man who was never offered the opportunity to have a trial in the first place.
I'm confused. Are the Black Pastors and other supporters of the family of Amaud Arbery on trial?
18:10 Look at both the state and the judges reaction to this particular statement, even they are embarrassed by what is being said there.
2:55 "more people than i can count ". So what we talking, 20, 25 people tops?
I am so embarrassed for the lawyer.
This guy is more focused on getting a mistrial rather than defending his client! He's gonna be the end of that man!
And so he was
Why does he think he is entitled to the last word.
Damn this man loves the sound of his own damn voice.
He really said “A motion a day “😂😂😂
thinking the judge would laugh or something 😂
Putting Travis McMichels on the stand was THE worst decision his attorney could make and begging for a mistrial ain't gonna work! #Stupid
Agreed. Dumb and Dumber.
Amazing how these killers are being touted as the victims. Of a public lynching no less. Exactly what they really did to the actual victim. Guilty..or justice does not exist in America.
The defense attorney sees the writing on the wall for his client so he is bringing this to the court to put on the record to appeal the verdict! What a 🤡
This might be the worst lawyer in America
Lawyer: Black people are scaring us. We motion for mistrial
Judge: Denied. People can protest
Lawyer: We have mobs of black people threatening to lynch us. We want mistrial
Judge: Denied. You have not put evidence which suggest such
Lawyer: We have black peoples in audience who could influence the court. We want mistrial
Judge: Denied. People are allowed to sit in.
Lawyer: We can’t prove these men not guilty. We want mistrial
Judge: Denied.
Lawyer: We saw black birds flying upside down. We demand mistrial
Judge: Denied
Lawyer: The black juror is biased. We move for mistrial
Judge: Denied
Lawyer: We think you’re biased for not agreeing with fellow whites. You are a traitor to your kind.
Judge: Finally you say the truth. And?
Lawyer: And we move for mistrial
Judge: There it is, denied
Lmaoooo this is genius
Unless all those pastors kick the court room doors open and go in there and are trying to take over the court. I’m not trying to here any of the bs he’s spilling.
Exactly
I said from the moment I heard Geoff spout off ab black pastors either he was a dufus or setting up for the current circumstance so he could use it for another mistrial effort or to be used in future appeals.
Exactly….and they fell right into his easily set trap!!! They should have stayed home to avoid all of this calling for a mistrial
I thought the same.. he's not a dumb man and said it for a reason so I'm thinking so there's a reason for appeal
This defense Lawyer is the Shining Example of why People Just Despise Most lawyers.