USA Vs China: Comparison Of The Two Countries’ Military Might Amid Muscle Flexing Over Taiwan

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 лис 2021
  • China under Xi Jinping is now pouring resources into building its nuclear arsenal. Reports say President Xi Jinping has set a goal of 2049 for China to be able to "fight and win" a major war with the US. Both US & China regularly flex their military muscle to assert their superiority over contentious issues like Taiwan. However, while China is advancing its military technology, the US still seems to have an edge.
    #ChineseMilitary #USMilitary #USChinaTensions
    Crux is your daily dose of the big, viral and relevant news in a few minutes. It’s your ultimate guide to staying informed on the latest in politics, international relations, sports, entertainment and social media
    Follow CRUX on Instagram (@crux.india): bit.ly/3qSFx1K
    Follow CRUX on Facebook: bit.ly/2Lte7iF
    #GetCloserToTheNews with latest headlines on politics, sports and entertainment on news18.com bit.ly/2Y4QccL
    Also watch:
    Crux One Take: bit.ly/3oNaLWf
    Crux Files: bit.ly/3mnbnjW
    Crux BTS: bit.ly/3oCjbQE

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @aesthescape4815
    @aesthescape4815 2 роки тому +198

    Apart from everything, the music never fails to amaze me!

    • @sohamchoughule5314
      @sohamchoughule5314 2 роки тому +3

      @@childhoodnostalgia4504 Bro why you mean? not cool

    • @reardelt
      @reardelt 2 роки тому +3

      Hal Tejas is nothing compared to F-35. Indian engineers can't make such good stuff

    • @starbeard5538
      @starbeard5538 2 роки тому +1

      @@reardelt Why the F are u Comparing 4 gen aircraft to 5th gen aircraft? WTF!

    • @reardelt
      @reardelt 2 роки тому +1

      @@starbeard5538 india doesnt have 5th gen aircraft

    • @organicrobot4710
      @organicrobot4710 2 роки тому +2

      I love when he uses this instrumental...🤣

  • @noside8469
    @noside8469 2 роки тому +182

    No matter how we compare military power of each country and their allies... at the end we all lose
    chaos, deaths, famine, pandemic etc.. name it only evil wins

    • @mobiuszero2424
      @mobiuszero2424 2 роки тому +7

      more like it doesnt matter if both party have enough nukes, no one win

    • @Yawayyyyy
      @Yawayyyyy 2 роки тому +6

      Nah whoever last one standing

    • @mobiuszero2424
      @mobiuszero2424 2 роки тому +20

      @@Yawayyyyy no one standing in nuclear winter

    • @amrbinhishamabujahl2959
      @amrbinhishamabujahl2959 2 роки тому +3

      Cowards speaks these words.

    • @mobiuszero2424
      @mobiuszero2424 2 роки тому +1

      @@amrbinhishamabujahl2959 kinda ironic since WW3 is delayed because soviet and US know this, both have nukes so they know no one wins anyway

  • @teukurajahitam8225
    @teukurajahitam8225 2 роки тому +42

    making more friends much better than adding enemies

    • @SouthernHadoken
      @SouthernHadoken 2 роки тому +8

      With friends like China, who need enemies.

    • @bakerstreet101
      @bakerstreet101 2 роки тому

      @@SouthernHadoken exactly.

    • @michaelwang6125
      @michaelwang6125 2 роки тому

      somehow your word of wisdom was obviously missed by Beijing's Wolf warrior regime that wants to break up the existing global order =/ despite knowing how this pandemic from wuhan and follow up actions cause EU/America/etc to rethink of their relationship with Beijing.
      This being said; it is also forming an alliance with several dictator regimes and they are indeed expanding with a military coup in 2 of the country that borders China and even 1-2 in Africa (guess who sold them weapons).

    • @SouthernHadoken
      @SouthernHadoken 2 роки тому

      @@michaelwang6125 China == the new axis of evil. They are trying to reinterpret Democracy with Chinese characters.

    • @michaelwang6125
      @michaelwang6125 2 роки тому +1

      @@SouthernHadoken =P try call it the Beijing or Communist characteristic because Beijing's party consist of roughly less than 100 million members... and even within them, not all support the current regime (aka why PLA had the most defectors in history during the wars it fought /e.g Korea war).
      They do not represent the Chinese people =/ hence why media/etc is always censored there to block knowledge.
      They are one of the biggest victims, hostages, and tools being used by the communist regime.
      This being said; if the regime is allowed to continue which the US current administration isn't planning to do anything above maintain the stats quo while giving the regime time to increase nuclear arms..
      It might become harder for even the existing Chinese to think for themselves if another generation goes through Maoism education. History often makes people who they are.

  • @bikescarsandeverythinginbe7309
    @bikescarsandeverythinginbe7309 2 роки тому +38

    An extraterrestrial threat would shut all of this silliness down.

    • @scottyates5758
      @scottyates5758 2 роки тому +1

      Chuck Norris will sort them out and send the space ship packing

    • @dathip
      @dathip 2 роки тому

      doesnt exist. fairytales

    • @user-cf9np9cy8q
      @user-cf9np9cy8q Рік тому

      Good one 😆

  • @hanfucolorful9656
    @hanfucolorful9656 2 роки тому +10

    5:09 that's stupid, it is a windmill, nobody put nuclear arsenal in a fixed location.

    • @thomaszhang3101
      @thomaszhang3101 2 роки тому +1

      They do. They put hundreds of silos in the middle of nowhere so in a nuclear exchange, the enemy have to waste more nukes to take out these silos, and have less nuke left to attack cities.
      What’s better, most of these silos can be left empty, but since the enemy is not sure which silo has the real nuke, they just waste extra ammo to destroy each and very silo.

    • @thanmawiachhangte1544
      @thanmawiachhangte1544 2 роки тому +1

      @@thomaszhang3101 😂 Let me tell you, Every country knows this tactic. You can't fool us around, your Cunningness won't trick us. Our spies already informed our Government so we're fine by that, We Didn't even act on the Silos, You Chainese are clever but not Clever Enough to outsmart us.

    • @thomaszhang3101
      @thomaszhang3101 2 роки тому +3

      @@thanmawiachhangte1544 it’s not really a matter of who knows this tactic, everyone does. Still, it makes no difference, does it?
      For example, I can totally keep only 10 nukes inside 1000 silos and rotate them around monthly by random chance. All information from spies are either outdated on arrival or will be out of date within a month or less.

    • @hanfucolorful9656
      @hanfucolorful9656 2 роки тому +1

      @@thomaszhang3101 Don't be stupid, if there is a real nuke attack, one nuke can wipe out all those so-called 5:09 silos farm.

    • @hanfucolorful9656
      @hanfucolorful9656 2 роки тому

      @@thanmawiachhangte1544 us means who?

  • @henli-rw5dw
    @henli-rw5dw 2 роки тому +64

    When both countries start blockading each other, eventually it'll be stalemate, but this will be the first time in a hundred years that Americans will experience hardship as prices in the store will inflate rapidly. On the plus side, US will finally move manufacturing back homw.

    • @user-in5kc9eu8b
      @user-in5kc9eu8b 2 роки тому +3

      and it will take a long time....even succeed...the product will be so expensive only sell in USA...and make in china will stay cheap. and beat make in USA in international market.

    • @ohliza3312
      @ohliza3312 2 роки тому +11

      Americans have done it before. We need to do it again. We can. We will.

    • @user-in5kc9eu8b
      @user-in5kc9eu8b 2 роки тому +10

      @@ohliza3312 If there are no competitors, of course, you can。But when there are stronger competitors (China), you can't

    • @g.l.9517
      @g.l.9517 2 роки тому

      If the US decided to blockade China at China's doorsteps, own turf, best of luck to the US. China will bomb the hell of the US naval war ships ---- which only few hundred miles away from China mainland in a matter of few minutes.

    • @harrisng3041
      @harrisng3041 2 роки тому +4

      🇨🇳 GOOD COMPARISON OF CHINA AND USA 🇱🇷
      🎵 China has a 4000 years history of nation building and was a nation called home to heaven long before the USA, before Jesus was borned, before the existence of the USA
      ⚘ China had have gone through many types of governmental systems and survived all of them: tribal system, dynasty system , democratic system, authocratic system , communist system and neo-capitalist system.
      The USA has only gone through one system: democratic imperialism and it is for only 300 yeats.
      ⚘💲💲💲The USA is the richest country in the world, but now it has a $33 trillion debt. China was the richest country in the world during the Ming and Tang Dynasty.
      China was never in debt...
      Unlije the US DOLLAR, the Yuan is monitored closely by the President.
      ⚘Both China and USA are bi-lingual
      ⚘ Both are good sportsmen and take the First and Second Position in the Olympics.
      ⚘Both lead the UN with remarkable responsibilty
      ⚘🎵Both are musical and the people sing a lot of songs and had written a lot of poetry
      😀⚘
      ...Harris Ng NYM
      New York Men

  • @beercan4835
    @beercan4835 2 роки тому +34

    Before it reaches the USA, it will first pass through Japan, Taiwan, South Korea, the Philippines, Guam, Hawaii and some other bases in the Pacific Ocean

    • @RashmiSingh-iw7my
      @RashmiSingh-iw7my 2 роки тому +10

      India too

    • @wildwildwest9588
      @wildwildwest9588 2 роки тому +21

      those countries you mentioned will become battle ground of china and US, they are the real losers here if they allow US to use them as their bases,

    • @beercan4835
      @beercan4835 2 роки тому +1

      @@wildwildwest9588 so before he reaches america he must first cover south korea, japan, taiwan, the philippines, guam, hawaii and other small countries in the pacific war with america is not easy because of the allies only nuclear can reach america that .is the reality of war

    • @wildwildwest9588
      @wildwildwest9588 2 роки тому +2

      @@beercan4835 its to easy for china to destroy america, no need to focus on those countries you mentioned. they are not treat to china. china just send them one nuclear and its over.

    • @beercan4835
      @beercan4835 2 роки тому +1

      @@wildwildwest9588 yup the war is only 30 mins. only america used atomic bombs in the war and everyone was afraid of its bad effects so it would be good if it was a nuclear war so that china would know the bad effects of nuclear bombs on its country .

  • @blackgod4794
    @blackgod4794 2 роки тому +65

    China has never waged wars against other countries. In contrast, everyone in the Wrolds understands what the US has done in other countries.

    • @californiausa7622
      @californiausa7622 2 роки тому +2

      The U
      USA has helped alot of country's monetarily etc ' Maybe you would prefer the NAZIs be in charge '' Go talk shit about China while in the country you will disappear''

    • @ex0duzz
      @ex0duzz 2 роки тому +13

      Like how USA makes people disappear anywhere in the world and then reappear in Guantanamo for free swimming lessoms?

    • @stewartbeche686
      @stewartbeche686 2 роки тому +6

      Yòu mean helping china fight japan in ww2 is meddling?

    • @zakariyyaumar7977
      @zakariyyaumar7977 2 роки тому +4

      @@californiausa7622 just like Julius assange and Edward snowden?

    • @Snowwie88
      @Snowwie88 2 роки тому +15

      Tell that to the people of Tibet

  • @evergrandebestrealestate4854
    @evergrandebestrealestate4854 2 роки тому +31

    Raytheon already has build Hypersonic missiles for The US Army. Get your facts straight.

    • @nikhilreddy8744
      @nikhilreddy8744 2 роки тому +5

      Building concerns visual but trail run and sucess defines the play

    • @VenturesAdventure
      @VenturesAdventure 2 роки тому +6

      And the last test that which miserably failed. Right? :D

    • @mralchemist3976
      @mralchemist3976 2 роки тому +1

      China already successful hit the target...btw

    • @nikhilreddy8744
      @nikhilreddy8744 2 роки тому +2

      @@mralchemist3976 noo it tested but it failed by missing target

    • @mralchemist3976
      @mralchemist3976 2 роки тому +1

      @@nikhilreddy8744 it's successful hit the target..

  • @jackytang3683
    @jackytang3683 2 роки тому +12

    The latest reference is the Korea war

  • @terencechaiwat6750
    @terencechaiwat6750 2 роки тому +51

    Comparisons of military hardware and software do not show the actual results on the ground.
    Many other factors come into play...like when we compare the military of America and its Allies with that of the Taliban.

    • @adrianleader784
      @adrianleader784 2 роки тому +12

      And with the might of the U.S and Co, the Taliban won the country in the end.

    • @bigfig5219
      @bigfig5219 2 роки тому +7

      Do you guys remember 9/11? America was never in Afghanistan to get rid of the Taliban, it was to deprive Al-Qaeda a base of operations to attack America from.

    • @joecater894
      @joecater894 2 роки тому +12

      @@adrianleader784 not really... the US just politically lost due to corrupt officals in afghan... and the fall of afghan from the importance list on americans priorities.. Militarily.. the US and alliance melted away the Talibs in an instant.... but the US is historically awful at holding territory for long term... it would have been better off handing that task over to someone else and then just supplying the resources... and maybe that is what they have done with the Taliban when they reliased the Afgan gov were corrupt and not viable. The US main priority wasn't to defeat the Taliban ; it was to keep out the Jihand networks... if the Talibs made a peace deal with the US.. its possible, they might have been handed that role.

    • @orecreeper2128
      @orecreeper2128 2 роки тому +3

      China has a traditional army and if it went to war with the US, it would be an actual war and not a weird 20 year semi-war like Afghanistan. Remember that the US removed the taliban from power in mere days. If the US wanted, it can return to Afghanistan anytime and kick the taliban back into the mountains. It’s only a matter of for how long.

    • @hiihienghui1086
      @hiihienghui1086 2 роки тому

      Korea wars

  • @RC-ev8wp
    @RC-ev8wp 2 роки тому +44

    Even if china overtakes usa in military power, China should understand that usa is not alone.

    • @anshajaysrivastava352
      @anshajaysrivastava352 2 роки тому +15

      That's the biggest difference and more importantly in a war china would be hurt more economically

    • @mobiuszero2424
      @mobiuszero2424 2 роки тому +21

      China also not alone, Russia is also backing China, so dont worry about china

    • @RC-ev8wp
      @RC-ev8wp 2 роки тому +21

      @@mobiuszero2424 in which case did russia supported china??? Even Russia afraid of China's expansionism, you know what? china claims russian territory Vladivostok. 🥴

    • @chillax9184
      @chillax9184 2 роки тому +7

      North Korea might step up for China because it's been long due that they want to take revenge on Americans while Russia might prefer to be on sideline and just watch. While other American allies will also be on sidelined except those who they have strong ties with and have the capabilities to fight

    • @themacso4157
      @themacso4157 2 роки тому +5

      Neither China is alone

  • @anonymouscitizen115
    @anonymouscitizen115 2 роки тому +189

    No doubt USA is still the most dominant and powerful nation militarily in the world but one can't deny the fact that the Chinese is catching up quickly with the USA both in terms of economy and military

    • @BeardedVikinG75
      @BeardedVikinG75 2 роки тому +4

      Poseidon and Christ sometimes Moses but most of the time a little b!tch

    • @desolateones
      @desolateones 2 роки тому +16

      China would destroy the pathetic woke US... They are mighty self proclaimed ffs

    • @Zakaius
      @Zakaius 2 роки тому +6

      THAT'S about the ONLY Teeth, (military) left the US have & it's getting blunt by the day.
      The rest of the other teeth are either Broken, lost or ineffective. The Balding Eagle is losing its grip on realities & STILL uses Old tricks. 😂😂

    • @silveriver9
      @silveriver9 2 роки тому +32

      The US has 800+ military bases around the world. It is the US we should be worried about. The US has been at war 93% of the time - 227 out of 245 years - since its founding in 1776. i.e. the U.S. has only been at peace for less than 20 years total since its birth.

    • @TimmyTheTimeTraveler
      @TimmyTheTimeTraveler 2 роки тому +6

      @@Zakaius Yet when other countries like Russia uses "Old tricks" you probably wouldn't say shit like that now would you?

  • @pjnelson6246
    @pjnelson6246 2 роки тому +10

    The present situation is alarming and the countries in coalition against China should be careful in controlling the aggressive and harmful attitude of China without escalating the situation
    leading to global war.

    • @semiramisubw4864
      @semiramisubw4864 2 роки тому +7

      lol. the only aggressive attidude i see since decades came from the US.

    • @user-lt3kv6rp9v
      @user-lt3kv6rp9v 2 роки тому

      美国侵略伊拉克,侵略阿富汗的事一字不提?况且台湾本来就是中国领土

    • @ex0duzz
      @ex0duzz 10 місяців тому

      That is why they accept. They've been crushed and colonized by force by the biggest bully lol.

  • @knighthammer7495
    @knighthammer7495 2 роки тому +27

    The Chinese army was built around counter-intervention capabilities (only for the US). Advancing rapidly over the years, they are yet to be powerful enough to take on the US on a full-scale conventional conflict. However, the PLA has what it takes to deter other factions from interfering in a regional war like an assault on Taiwan, and it already has a crushing advantage over ROC military forces. As long as the cost outweighs the gain the US will not attempt to intervene in the war on Taiwan.

    • @user-in5kc9eu8b
      @user-in5kc9eu8b 2 роки тому +2

      @Leon if usa fight and lost...the cost would even higher...if usa lost and use nuclear weapons...then the earth is doom and cost more higher.
      if usa win....it is not going to happen...because taiwan is part of china . china will try again and again until success.

    • @user-in5kc9eu8b
      @user-in5kc9eu8b 2 роки тому

      @Leon Neither Pearl Harbor nor 9 / 11 against the enemy of China.. So there is no comparability. So let's see how the United States behaved when the enemy was China (Korean War)?
      At that time, the United States had far better equipment and logistics than China, but it was defeated by China.... Maybe you think it was a draw, but careful analysis: when the first fight between China and the United States was on the Chinese border, the endwar was on the 38th line. Look, China pushed the us back, so of course it was China that defeated the United States!
      Now, China's equipment is much better than that in 1950. There is only dead way for the United States to go to war with China

    • @wangeliswangelis1464
      @wangeliswangelis1464 2 роки тому +3

      @Leon Most Americans like yourself rightly believe that the U.S. military is the best and most formidable in the world. If that is correct, why, since the end of World War II, has the United States lost every war it started and failed every time it used force without just cause? Indeed, if the U.S. military was a sports team, it would land in the bottom divisions.

    • @g.l.9517
      @g.l.9517 2 роки тому +3

      In the modern naval warfare, all aircraft carriers no matter how large or small are sitting ducks --- all you need is one or two surface-to-surface (anti-ship) guided missiles hit the top deck, that aircraft carrier is useless.
      As in the old saying, the 門口狗 不能 输 的, (in any dog fight, the dog at front of his own front door step will protect his turf by all means; and it will not loss the fight until his dead). If any foreign war ships (including the aircraft carrier) thousand miles away from their home base come right at the front door of China, I don't think China can afford to loss that fight. If China ever loss that fight right at the front of its own door step, its own turf, China might as well pack up, close the door, kiss this World good-bye, and will not able face any countries in the World. I don’t think China will willing to do that.
      I believe, the best and most effective naval warfare strategy to fight with a country whose war ships with bigger aircraft carriers but they are thousand miles away from their home base, is to use the strategy called the "蚁多咬死象" (says that enough ants may bite an elephant to death) --- Every enemy ship no matter how large or small will be escort, shadow, by ten small low cost and fast built speedboats. Each speedboat will be equipped with:
      1. Two rows of vertical launch missiles tubes --- the first row of tube consisting of four medium range surface-to-air guided missiles (anti-aircraft heat seeking missile); the second row of tube consisting of four medium range surface-to-surface guided missiles (anti-ship ballistic missile, ASBM) --- to turn the aircraft carrier into a sitting duck.
      2. 2. Each side of the boat equip with two torpedoes tubes with guided torpedoes.
      3. 3. In the rear, equip with two depth-charge launchers or vertical launch anti-submarine rocket.
      4. 4. One self-defense short-range cannon.
      5. 5. With a six men crew.
      6. During the attack, all ten speedboats will coordinate their firepower to just one ship they escort, and/or shadow.
      Ten speedboats with the total firepower of 40 anti-aircraft missiles and 40 anti-ship missiles. 20 torpedoes or 20 anti-submarine rockets. All you need is one or two missiles hit the target.
      In additional, all those speedboats will be backup by:
      A. On shore “aircraft-carrier killer” missile such as the Chinese DF-21D.
      B. Aircraft carriers
      C. Destroyers
      D. Frigates
      E. Corvettes
      F. Submarines

    • @shafthespaceegg
      @shafthespaceegg 2 роки тому

      Taiwan manufactures most of the US’s computer chips so the US has a reason to fight

  • @julicomo9815
    @julicomo9815 2 роки тому +6

    One country has been perptually at war since 1941.

  • @ForBetterWorld
    @ForBetterWorld 2 роки тому +52

    It's not about how much strength you have. You must have the capability to use it

    • @prateek2645
      @prateek2645 2 роки тому +1

      Its not called capability its strategy

    • @thomasdevos2220
      @thomasdevos2220 2 роки тому +10

      US has the experience to use it for sure

    • @mrcool2107
      @mrcool2107 2 роки тому

      China has used this for centuries

    • @user1qaz2wsx3edc
      @user1qaz2wsx3edc 2 роки тому

      It's all about numbers..China 1.5billion..

    • @theilluminati4406
      @theilluminati4406 2 роки тому +4

      @@user1qaz2wsx3edc and we have a nuke that can minus that number

  • @chrisetzkorn3861
    @chrisetzkorn3861 2 роки тому +24

    Doesn't matter how good equipment or personal is if u got shit for leadership your gona get your ass kicked

    • @matthewvarnam4302
      @matthewvarnam4302 2 роки тому +3

      The U.S.A just might have a (POS) in office right now but it doesn't make our U.S Military weak. The Military of the U.S.A will forever be Strong Mighty and Great and a God fearing country...🇺🇸💯

    • @user1qaz2wsx3edc
      @user1qaz2wsx3edc 2 роки тому

      Is that why you eliminated 4 of your leaders in the past?

  • @sanjeetdalal3053
    @sanjeetdalal3053 2 роки тому +18

    The real question here is whether America is willing to defend taiwan

    • @globalgkbyspmohanty7248
      @globalgkbyspmohanty7248 2 роки тому +2

      Sure.... Bcoz of its intrest... Taiwan is the biggest semiconductor industry

    • @ex0duzz
      @ex0duzz 2 роки тому +8

      China bombs tsmc with the first missile strikes. Nothing left to defend.
      So USA won't enter the war then you're saying?

    • @cedriceric9730
      @cedriceric9730 2 роки тому +1

      Judging by the past absolutely :)
      China defended northkorea and offered it's very existance to defend it
      America repaid the same favour with Taiwan and offered up the entire global chip industry to lock the deal.
      Come what may china just cannot be allowed to land on Taiwan😉

    • @cedriceric9730
      @cedriceric9730 2 роки тому

      @@ex0duzz
      Almost every product now days needs chips ,lol
      And most of them like freaking half come from Taiwan
      unlike COVID which china pushed the blame off itself
      No excuses will be accepted from china

    • @user-dt2lk7bx1q
      @user-dt2lk7bx1q 2 роки тому +1

      @@cedriceric9730 but would America ecer have the gut to consider Taiwan as a nation?Pretty sure Bidens administration did not say a word about that.

  • @agentstevehaines9164
    @agentstevehaines9164 2 роки тому +1

    Lets have our dictators fight:
    Winnie the pooh VS oops i pooped my pants.

  • @himanshubachchan4361
    @himanshubachchan4361 2 роки тому +14

    Chinese army is on papers but US is tested & tried in many armed combats

    • @josh6567
      @josh6567 2 роки тому +3

      Facts.

    • @AnujKumar-pv7ci
      @AnujKumar-pv7ci 2 роки тому +1

      Example Afghanistan

    • @Hmonks
      @Hmonks 2 роки тому +2

      @@AnujKumar-pv7ci you mean US force have made the Taliban hide behind women and cave for the last 20 years.

    • @sanelezama3846
      @sanelezama3846 2 роки тому +1

      @@Hmonks America never gone to war alone and you are talking about minor wars with small countries

    • @Jewel_Screaming_Chango8387
      @Jewel_Screaming_Chango8387 2 роки тому

      On satan 🙏🏾

  • @juanmontoya6622
    @juanmontoya6622 2 роки тому +11

    Sounds like the time period prior to Dec 7th, 1941. Japan had an impressive
    military might with several aircraft carriers, naval vessels, and even military
    campaign experience in various regions in Asia. Like Japan, China is resources
    poor, and unlikely to withstand a long term attrition war with the US.

    • @user-zs9ek1bx5z
      @user-zs9ek1bx5z 2 роки тому +1

      *Like the empire of Japan before... "the many" against one powerful nation...*

    • @juanmontoya6622
      @juanmontoya6622 2 роки тому +1

      @@user-zs9ek1bx5z In Naval battles, it was essentially Japan against the US. The US clearly won that confrontation. Without a Navy, Japan was a second rate power.

  • @petersinclair3997
    @petersinclair3997 2 роки тому +8

    Unless, the parade weapons are props, its pretty dumb, to place so much key materiel in one place.

    • @user-in5kc9eu8b
      @user-in5kc9eu8b 2 роки тому +2

      @@larry6601 How do you explain that China's 0 case policy has effectively protected people's lives. On the other hand, 780000 people died in the United States, right?
      As a Chinese, I obviously see that the Chinese government cares more about human life than the United States

    • @user-in5kc9eu8b
      @user-in5kc9eu8b 2 роки тому +2

      @@larry6601 1.4 billion people, 20% the world's population, yet only accounting for less than 0.01% of the global new cases. It's not efficiency, it's blatant manipulation of the numbers.
      -----------------------------------
      This is not evidence... According to your logic, the population of the United States only accounts for 5% of the world's total population. How can its economy account for 30% of the world economy? It must be fake...
      The United States said that China was evil and funny. The United States blew so many countries back to the stone age.. This is not a massacre? Isn't this evil?
      The United States eliminated terrorists by killing. As a result, terrorists not only did not eliminate, but aroused hatred, making more and more terrorists emerge Isis..
      China uses education to teach people not to be terrorists, and provides skills education so that people can have a good job.. then.. Terrorism disappeared in Xinjiang..
      So the problem of the United States is that it thinks it is the best of everything and is unwilling to learn from others. It is the same with terrorism and the fight against epidemic.. Therefore, the United States failed in anti-terrorism and anti epidemic... Then the United States became angry and began to discredit China... But the fact is the fact. Smearing does not turn the fact into a virtual reality

    • @user-in5kc9eu8b
      @user-in5kc9eu8b 2 роки тому +4

      @@larry6601 full of shit!
      shit 1:this is evidence? No wonder the United States is still discussing whether to wear masks. No wonder 780000 people died in the United States... Poor American dead, you are just data, no one cares about your life and death..
      shit 2:far to han dynsty,xinjiang already part of china .that time your Jesus Not yet born. yes .china lost it for a long time. but when china take it back in Qing dynasty. USA didn't exist....so if china give up xinjiang .then USA need to disappear. right?
      shit 3:you completely ignored the bombing of other countries back to the stone age, you think it's not a big deal? shame on you
      shit 4:if USA is best at everything ,why cant deal with convid19 and cost 780000 death? you are very funny

    • @g.l.9517
      @g.l.9517 2 роки тому

      @@larry6601 You are one of those people who got a complete brain washed by the western news medias.

    • @user-in5kc9eu8b
      @user-in5kc9eu8b 2 роки тому

      @@larry6601 too long .no time to read them all.
      In the convid19 data, China is very transparent. If you choose not to believe it, it does not mean that it is opaque.
      I also don't believe that only 780000 people died in the United States, because you don't have mess test. As long as China finds cases, it will test the whole region and even the whole city to ensure that all cases finded. Has the United States done so? No!
      nah,han Chinese population are bigger than Uighur in Xinjiang now.
      I have no time to read the rest

  • @crizeric5265
    @crizeric5265 2 роки тому +7

    US hundreds of years ahead, but failed the Korean Peninsula war,Vietnam war and Afghan war. Face solid Chinese army and consolidated Chinese people, can they win for sure?

    • @stewartbeche686
      @stewartbeche686 2 роки тому +4

      AMERICA WON IN KOREA :FORCED CHINA BACK TO ORIGINAL BORDER. AMERICA PULLED OUT OF S. VIETNAM IN 1973......N.VIETNAM TOOK SOUTH 1975...NO AMERICANS THERE.

    • @cedriceric9730
      @cedriceric9730 2 роки тому +1

      @@stewartbeche686 even Vietnam wasn't lost , local pressure over the meaningless war was what ended it.
      If you consider vietnamese casualties , it doesnt bear measuring....
      The USA was too high on excess redundant military stores and WW2 victory over japan they used brute force instead of brains in vietnam !!!
      But they learnt extremely valuable lessons from that war:
      Lessons which every country is now copying
      1. Body armour- the USA underestimated the imapct of assault weapons after Vietnam they didn't.
      2. Close air support.
      Every military world wide is building close air support against guerilla insurgents
      3.helicopters, before the war helicopters were toys after they developed to what they are now.
      4. Medical and psychological lessons are too many to list.
      Basically the entire us military is a product of Vietnam and it's a world beating army with only a few chance casualties since then.

    • @Snowwie88
      @Snowwie88 2 роки тому +1

      Yeah, but the issue that is always is forgotten in these two wars, both Korea and Vietnam, it was not a war to the 'death', like in World War 2, the United States had no choice after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. Only after that the mighty war machine of the United States went into full strength and that war was conquer or be conquered. This was never the case in Vietnam or Korea, so naturally the US did not gave it all. Otherwise they could have simply nuked both North Vietnam and North Korea to a big parking lot.

    • @g.l.9517
      @g.l.9517 2 роки тому

      Actually the US already way behind in the military weapon development such as the hypersonic missiles. The US has yet to test one successfully as recent as last month.
      Besides, Big different between the China's and the US military personnel is that the China's military personnel are pledged to serve the country and is willing to die for it. Where the US military personnel is all volunteers and paid for with a sign up bonus approximately of US $10,000. They will not consider to die in the battlefield as a option; especially the battlefield is at a foreign soil. That is why the US loss all those wars they started in the foreign soil.

    • @user1qaz2wsx3edc
      @user1qaz2wsx3edc 2 роки тому

      @@cedriceric9730 lol,the US lost all these wars against soldiers ill equipped with Ak's wearing sandals&turbans..

  • @randomwot3858
    @randomwot3858 2 роки тому +54

    The US military should just stop building stuff because China just copy’s everything they build. 😂😂

    • @mrsmith3403
      @mrsmith3403 2 роки тому +12

      just love the INDIAN they like to stand behind the US and boast.

    • @the123arjun
      @the123arjun 2 роки тому +10

      @ typical human,What would you say about 5G and hypersonic missiles? May be you might say they copied America's future technologies, ever dreamed of yet.

    • @unconscious1076
      @unconscious1076 2 роки тому +14

      If copying is so easy why third worlds cannot copy it and become rich powerful independent simply? Hun because they simply can't
      Even most American and Russian millitary technologies are copied or inspired by Germans
      Why superpower 2020 still buy weapons and can't even make a paracetamol without Chinese raw material (Forget about millitary technologies)

    • @mrsmith3403
      @mrsmith3403 2 роки тому +2

      @hehe boi GO INDIA GO , the whole WORLD will support INDIA, together we will stand on TOP of you.
      💪💪💪💪💪💪💪

    • @kaustubhraizada
      @kaustubhraizada 2 роки тому

      @@unconscious1076 raw material is cheap In china 😂😂

  • @sess678
    @sess678 2 роки тому +6

    I hope the US never goes to war against China but if they do the sooner the better for the US because China gets stronger every year and while the US still leads China in overall military technology.

    • @LONEWOLF-rq5tl
      @LONEWOLF-rq5tl 2 роки тому +1

      So do you think the US military doesn't and just sits idle? That's the thing about us in the US,we don't announce everything like everyone else does and everything we tell you is on a "what we want you to know basis"!!!☠☠

    • @jiangnorman
      @jiangnorman 2 роки тому

      "Never" might not be appropriate here. US actually went to war with China in Korean peninsula in the 1950s. US did not won that war, but did got some achievement elsewhere. The 7th fleet stopped Chinese PLA to end Chinese civil war, and let the ROC regime remain in the Taiwan Island till today.

  • @Absolut531kmh
    @Absolut531kmh 2 роки тому +6

    as of me, i don't think we all want war do we.

    • @Megalodon64
      @Megalodon64 2 роки тому +1

      I do, I wanna see the F-35 kick the living fuel out of those crappy J-20s.

    • @Absolut531kmh
      @Absolut531kmh 2 роки тому

      @@Megalodon64 smh anti air could just eliminate everything in the air

  • @AB-fi5jt
    @AB-fi5jt 2 роки тому +14

    Imagining what’s in the minds of Chinese and US soldiers when they are on their way to fight for Taiwan, you’ll see who will win the war.

    • @raivisaudjukevics6682
      @raivisaudjukevics6682 2 роки тому

      Taiwan will be with knife in her back

    • @jeremyharris2980
      @jeremyharris2980 2 роки тому +4

      Honestly I have a good idea Chinese soldiers will think it's for the reunification of China because they are taught it is their right to do so and anyone not supporting it is by definition immoral. The US soldiers will be told and for the most part thinking they March in defense of freedom and democracy of the tiawanese people which is partially true and in defense of Japan and our homeland from the undoubted progression of Chinese expansion but the real reason will be for $$ and power as all wars in human history

    • @suvch5842
      @suvch5842 2 роки тому

      @@jeremyharris2980 But BET US will Loose for Sure this time Taiwan should be prepared to fight against China ......

    • @suvch5842
      @suvch5842 2 роки тому

      @@jeremyharris2980 I think It's necessary for US to fall For India's rise cause China's rise is enivitable and so is America's fall

    • @nicholas2129
      @nicholas2129 2 роки тому +1

      In a fight for Taiwan, China would 100% win, america and china’s target is not to invade each other, it’s for Taiwan, geologically China has a HUGE edge over America

  • @kentriat2426
    @kentriat2426 2 роки тому +29

    What a lot of commentators leave out when talking about the US military budget is how much is spend on overseas bases and advance placement of equipment around the world. These bases strip billion upon billions out of the budget with some estimates of just under half goes to these bases.
    The other key feature is US military equipment on average cost up to three times that of Russian or China so the high expenditure doesn’t actually provide greater purchase power in numbers delivered.
    The other point on the experience held by the US military is a bit mute as it has been gained in one sided wars against lower equiped enemies. No country has fought and equal in over 60 years since the Korean War. The turn over in military personnel in the US military is of concern as many NCO’s and junior officers with combat experience are leaving the services

    • @briansale5619
      @briansale5619 2 роки тому +10

      You missed one or two, the cost of buying the media, the politicians, the courts. The cost of buying NATO, the UN, and assorted allies. Leased we forget the cost of running the military complex. The most sad cost is to the American people weather they realize it or not.

    • @waiz0231
      @waiz0231 2 роки тому +1

      Must be why you have so many homeless people in the US

    • @robertlangley687
      @robertlangley687 2 роки тому

      @@waiz0231 in a way just has bad as NK.

    • @ex0duzz
      @ex0duzz 2 роки тому +1

      Korean War was not an equal fight, china had backwards army and zero tech, no nukes and in crippling poverty. USA was superpower with nukes and air and sea dominance.
      USA was Goliath and china was David. China won by defending North Korea.

    • @orecreeper2128
      @orecreeper2128 2 роки тому

      @@ex0duzz numerical superiority matters too (unless you’re the soviets)

  • @beppeadr
    @beppeadr 2 роки тому +5

    China has 2.2 million active units with more than 1 bln reserve, ahahahaha...

    • @daveershumluc781
      @daveershumluc781 2 роки тому +1

      most of those are old people that can't lift a a water bottle let alone a rifle

  • @atari8gen947
    @atari8gen947 2 роки тому

    Meanwhile Taiwan -*hehe* I'm in danger

  • @donsise1126
    @donsise1126 2 роки тому +6

    Pray for peace everyone, every day!...as these leaders are going insane on nukes count...deja-vu of the Cold War hike?!

  • @thebackbencherschannel5623
    @thebackbencherschannel5623 2 роки тому +4

    China... We hqve the biggest navy comprises of 385 warships........mean a while United' states which made and operated 6700 warships in just 4 years during ww2 🥴

    • @user-rq9xi1se8v
      @user-rq9xi1se8v 2 роки тому

      二战的军舰要求并不高商船就能改

  • @rolandogallardo395
    @rolandogallardo395 2 роки тому +11

    It's not about numbers but performance surely China has twice as much warship, jets , missiles and manpower but

    • @user-ls5tg8ec9m
      @user-ls5tg8ec9m 2 роки тому +6

      The Koreans have pulled off victories when they were outnumbered like 1:10 for each Battle of Salsu, or Battle of Myeongnyang, and many more battles. Obviously the Koreans also lost some battles in there history just like others, but what can you say. The Koreans have always been outnumbered.

    • @jigolocana7492
      @jigolocana7492 2 роки тому

      US has more fighter jets than China.

    • @user1qaz2wsx3edc
      @user1qaz2wsx3edc 2 роки тому +1

      Lmao,numbers??well1.5 billion can produce much more...

  • @yin8838
    @yin8838 2 роки тому +2

    No one would win, a nuke war would be the end of mankind. Pointless to say who has the biggest military.

  • @faheemmubarak890
    @faheemmubarak890 2 роки тому +2

    I really liked this video.

  • @ramakurunaathanveeraian2520
    @ramakurunaathanveeraian2520 2 роки тому +4

    What Gandhi said ....with war u go no where ...this simple idea also the world leaders do not understand

  • @kamwaichan8048
    @kamwaichan8048 2 роки тому +3

    The US army has many experience in war conflict, but the Chinese army will fight for their nation with heart and mind.
    Nuclear weapons will only destroy all mainkind, up to date only the US has used nuclear weapons on Japanese people.
    The US is more aggressive than the Chinese government, China only want to unify Taiwan. As it was once occupied by the Japanese government, after the surrendered of the Japanese government. The US was supposed to discuss the return of Taiwan back to China, they kept it on the intention for the future to keep a close eye on China and able to launch attack on China easily should it requires.
    Future war will involve AI ....

  • @user-zf8es3jd3r
    @user-zf8es3jd3r 2 роки тому +1

    In terms of hypersonic missiles and aircraft, US is not really lagging behind China and Russia. See X-37B spacecraft that NASA previously developed. X-37B was believed by the Russians aviation experts to be a space hypersonic bomber and spy plane . But it was denied by US officials. NASA said the aircraft was intended to carry satellites to space, due to its low cost delivery compare to the space shuttle. This spacecraft has a speed of Mach 24 in orbit, and was believed that the spacecraft is able to carry 6 nuclear warheads, and yes, this spacecraft is unmanned. So technically, US hypersonic capabilities are not really lagging behind, it is Russia and China who are catching up. Some US news headlines are often misleading, maybe just to prompt up US military effort to develop something China and Russia not able to catch up with.

  • @christopherbong6639
    @christopherbong6639 2 роки тому +2

    One thing to keep in mind os that the American naval and air power has to be spread throughout the world where as the Chinese can throw all their resources to defend their country.

  • @linhai69
    @linhai69 2 роки тому +4

    Why doesn't China support the human rights of BLM and Native America the way US supports Taiwan and Uighurs?

  • @louisianapatriot5818
    @louisianapatriot5818 2 роки тому +8

    Actually there are several other countries making a stand in support of independence. They deserve to be acknowledged also.

    • @mrsmith3403
      @mrsmith3403 2 роки тому +2

      yes, for example KALISTAN , Kashmir .

    • @anormalhuman2071
      @anormalhuman2071 2 роки тому +2

      @@mrsmith3403 yes like Tibet and Hong Kong.

    • @krishivagarwal5189
      @krishivagarwal5189 2 роки тому

      @@anormalhuman2071 Hong kong is a part of china and tibet has been china controlled for a long long time

  • @ramakurunaathanveeraian2520
    @ramakurunaathanveeraian2520 2 роки тому +1

    Well China has the guts

  • @anjanikumar8792
    @anjanikumar8792 2 роки тому +1

    Background music name please🙏

  • @alphacentauri7381
    @alphacentauri7381 2 роки тому +11

    Let the world be with no major wars please. If it's comes to war, humanity will stand by the greatest country on earth -USA.

    • @thejassunil4127
      @thejassunil4127 2 роки тому +5

      No country is the greatest .
      Every country is great by its own ways.

    • @diollinebranderson6553
      @diollinebranderson6553 2 роки тому +2

      @@thejassunil4127 USA is not greatest by morals, but certainly by job opporrunities and able to become rich. like the US alone has 21,000,000 people that are millionares. for comparision, China only has 5,000,000 people who are millionares.

    • @hanfucolorful9656
      @hanfucolorful9656 2 роки тому +3

      @@diollinebranderson6553 You should compare how many homeless people in Los Angeles and how many in Shanghai.

  • @muanafanai4723
    @muanafanai4723 2 роки тому +30

    China became so powerful but USA is still far more powerful can't deny that America is still da boss..

    • @kooyansen3933
      @kooyansen3933 2 роки тому +5

      Indian is not on this league..no others nation better no comparison..before talk better see them in mirror..

    • @arunks8778
      @arunks8778 2 роки тому +1

      @@kooyansen3933 Bruh It will China Vs USA. For Now USA will have The Upper hand.

    • @josh6567
      @josh6567 2 роки тому +1

      Of course. And will always be. Especially when many countries in the world already hates xinnie the pooh.

    • @foodforthoughtinslo-mo4158
      @foodforthoughtinslo-mo4158 2 роки тому +4

      @Muana Fanai clearly you are living in a fantasy, USA couldn't beat the taliban for over 20 years fighting an unprofessional army, with no firearm power yet USA failed miserably, so chill China is the new boss

    • @silveriver9
      @silveriver9 2 роки тому +2

      The US has 800+ military bases around the world. It is the US we should be worried about. The US has been at war 93% of the time - 227 out of 245 years - since its founding in 1776. i.e. the U.S. has only been at peace for less than 20 years total since its birth.

  • @PrinceKumar-cf7ek
    @PrinceKumar-cf7ek 2 роки тому +2

    God bless🙏💐💐💐🙏🇺🇸 USA China🇨🇳

  • @ankitkhadka26
    @ankitkhadka26 2 роки тому

    the china ladakh new law video's music was awesome.Name please?

  • @ramakurunaathanveeraian2520
    @ramakurunaathanveeraian2520 2 роки тому +5

    Well everyone and every animal has the right to live on earth

  • @henli-rw5dw
    @henli-rw5dw 2 роки тому +3

    The question is what kind of war a war in the pacific will be. I contend that troops doesn't really matter. It's ship and anti-ship missiles and drones. It's about how can blockade each other and who can survive a blockade longer. With today's technology all cargo ships are sitting duck and all shipping lanes will essentially shut down in the pacific. Thus, it's a war of economic attrition. He who can survive without shipping, wins.

    • @ryanvaldez9292
      @ryanvaldez9292 2 роки тому

      Well china will lose because no oil will coming in.us bomb will bomb all railways connecting china and blocked malacca strait.us is free in atlantic ocean

    • @henli-rw5dw
      @henli-rw5dw 2 роки тому +1

      @@ryanvaldez9292 They have the russian oil.

    • @henli-rw5dw
      @henli-rw5dw 2 роки тому +1

      @@ryanvaldez9292 It's not that easy bombing railroad between Russia and China. Very far away and protect obviously by both countries.

    • @henli-rw5dw
      @henli-rw5dw 2 роки тому +3

      @@ryanvaldez9292 The bigger issue is the energy supply to Korea, Japan and Taiwan as the shipping lane shutdown will immediately cripple them.

    • @henli-rw5dw
      @henli-rw5dw 2 роки тому +1

      @@ryanvaldez9292 And even if you bomb the railroad, if need be they'll just truck it over at a higher cost. Whereas it's much easier for their satellite to locate oil tankers almost anywhere in the pacific and take them out with a $50 sub drone.

  • @bingus8135
    @bingus8135 2 роки тому +1

    Meanwhile world temperature go brr...

  • @mohammedabdullahiattah6803
    @mohammedabdullahiattah6803 2 роки тому +2

    U.S. nuclear weapons is just over 3000 not 5.5000

  • @user-dm4gs1ig7r
    @user-dm4gs1ig7r 2 роки тому +3

    USA much more experience ,better equipment ,better research, better organized. Not using kids forced to join the military or using copycat equipment.

    • @anthonycastaneda6939
      @anthonycastaneda6939 2 роки тому

      Not to mention numerous other countries with big time assets in the sea waiting to pounce, hopefully cooler heads will prevail..But we can’t just give in.. These guys are poaching everywhere…Seems like he wants to own all the surrounding smaller island countries..Its unbelievable that this is actually going down. Hopefully our president who has unfairly been maligned will, along with his advisers will find a way through this mess

    • @anthonycastaneda6939
      @anthonycastaneda6939 2 роки тому

      I ordered a cool pair of Rayban Ferrari sunglasses….took four months to get them…And what I got was 4 random knock offs…Lol..I should have known better…Place was called Sunglass Hut USA….Beware!

    • @nicholas2129
      @nicholas2129 2 роки тому

      USA having more experience makes it sound like it’s just far more bloodthirsty than China, since america has been released by Britain 90% of the time until now it was at war

  • @nsng1298
    @nsng1298 2 роки тому +8

    General MacArthur warned JFK to avoid a land war in Asia. JFK, based on this warning of General MacArthur said, "Anyone wanting to commit ground troops to Asia, should have his
    head examined".
    MacArthur saw what happened in Korea when the poorly armed Chinese troops with no heavy weapons, tanks and air support drove the combined armed forces of the U.S. and the
    U.N. back to the south and fought to a stalemate.
    MacArthur was so arrogant and cocky as to say, "We will be home by Christmas". He even said the U.S. should use nuclear bombs on China.
    The U.S. did not dare to cross the 17th parallel to invade North Vietnam for fear the Chinese would intervene just like what had happened in Korea.

    • @g.l.9517
      @g.l.9517 2 роки тому +3

      Big different between the China's and the US military personnel is that the China's military personnel are pledged to serve the country and is willing to die for it. Where the US military personnel is all volunteers and paid for with a sign up bonus approximately of US $10,000. They will not consider to die in the battlefield as a option; especially the battlefield is at a foreign soil. That is why the US loss all those wars they started in the foreign soil.

    • @idontcareanymore2754
      @idontcareanymore2754 2 роки тому +5

      The Chinese had nothing to do with the US/ ROK forces being overwhelmed and pushed to Pusan. That was all North Korea. China only intervened whenUS led Allied forces broke out and pushed into North Korea.
      And what happened when the Vietnam War ended, right, China and Vietnam went to war.
      So learn history before you spout Chinese propaganda.DB.

    • @suvch5842
      @suvch5842 2 роки тому +1

      @@g.l.9517 That's why they want to use my nation India is a pawn see none of my Army is going there to fight for becoming a pawn of US sorry to say this But India should rise and US should fall because world has enough of US

    • @user-cf9np9cy8q
      @user-cf9np9cy8q Рік тому

      @@suvch5842 Lucky for India. If not for the US India would still be eating dirt

    • @suvch5842
      @suvch5842 Рік тому

      @@user-cf9np9cy8q lol nice joke

  • @moisesfuentes2090
    @moisesfuentes2090 2 роки тому +1

    China & Mao Tse Tung did it in 1953; the first defeat to the champion of the WWII

  • @vanle974
    @vanle974 2 роки тому +1

    hello Taiwan, hello tsai ing wen...don't worry about biden's speech...we don't want war in east sea..we don't want Taiwan to declare independence..we don't want to hurt china..but we will support taiwan as a sovereign country..a really democratic country which will be supported to the fullest to join international organizations, to have strong military power , to gain international recognition as a free n democratic country...good luck

  • @tushar6767
    @tushar6767 2 роки тому +3

    Everything aside when it comes to Experience US & their Army's have more experience than china ,so US is far far ahed from china

  • @warbeast894
    @warbeast894 2 роки тому +8

    US has upper hand because F16, and 35 show grear performance in Syria and Libya war.
    Mean while
    Chinese J20 has not fought a single war.
    Because in war experienced and test weapons are preferred more than newly weapons.

    • @themacso4157
      @themacso4157 2 роки тому +4

      F35 are useless and have limited capabilities. Spain has recently refused to buy them. No one wants the american f35, sorry.

    • @josh6567
      @josh6567 2 роки тому +1

      @@themacso4157 yeah sure keep that to yourself. 😂😂

    • @andropovyuri7859
      @andropovyuri7859 2 роки тому +1

      F16 + f35 vs ak47 🤕🤕🤕 experience?

    • @nicholas2129
      @nicholas2129 2 роки тому

      Isn’t that a good thing? America is far more bloodthirsty than China

  • @247zzzzzZZ
    @247zzzzzZZ 2 роки тому +1

    how does taliban stacks up against US and still kicked their bums?

    • @patrioticsammy6454
      @patrioticsammy6454 2 роки тому +1

      no one can end jihad....so be it America or any other country ....they cannot be wiped out....and Afghanistan geography is like that which makes it hard to fight and spot them....other wars which they lost...idk

    • @247zzzzzZZ
      @247zzzzzZZ 2 роки тому +1

      @@patrioticsammy6454 same excuse they had why they lost in Vietnam. im just saying all these muscle flexing doesn't really translate to the results we expected. im not singling out US, same thing applies to China with their recent boasting.

    • @patrioticsammy6454
      @patrioticsammy6454 2 роки тому

      @@247zzzzzZZ hmm...yeah ig didnt research muc abt American history so idk...but ur right

  • @cortezdaslayer4347
    @cortezdaslayer4347 2 роки тому

    Why is no one taking into consideration what the people would do during the war?

  • @user-nj6vp1hg5r
    @user-nj6vp1hg5r 2 роки тому +54

    I prefer blue white💙 stars' over red ⭐yellow

  • @mahiii7723
    @mahiii7723 2 роки тому +3

    China military is like big balloon, they never faught any war, they are just broilers and chickens. The reality always fears china
    However it's not about number, it's about courage and technology.
    There can be 100 pigs they can never equals to a lion 🦁🦁🦁🦁😂😂😂😂

    • @user-in5kc9eu8b
      @user-in5kc9eu8b 2 роки тому +1

      that shows China is a peaceful country and USA isn't

    • @noahb5334
      @noahb5334 2 роки тому

      @@user-in5kc9eu8b Xi jinping is gay and looks like winnie the pooh, Communism sucks ass

    • @user-in5kc9eu8b
      @user-in5kc9eu8b 2 роки тому

      @@noahb5334 so you vote a useless pretty boy-- Trump as president? interesting

  • @ramakurunaathanveeraian2520
    @ramakurunaathanveeraian2520 2 роки тому +1

    All countries must give up on weapons ...this is really stupidity ...building more and more powerful weapons ...

  • @omalyathirasari
    @omalyathirasari 2 роки тому

    factors that can make a war win
    experience
    military power
    military budget

  • @lahaes
    @lahaes 2 роки тому +17

    Difference is China's military is for defensive purposes and the U.S mostly offensive.

    • @guillermoelenes4310
      @guillermoelenes4310 2 роки тому

      Yes Koko i agree and the yanks mostly suck their most recent victory was in grenada pop 175,000 in the 80’s the army its only good at making money lots of money have you ever sow a defense contractor Poor? Jajajajajajaj this yanks and their sisi korean boys jajajajajaja

    • @Liboch
      @Liboch 2 роки тому +1

      This video says China has the home advantage, meaning the US intends to attack China.

    • @human-bt1iz
      @human-bt1iz 2 роки тому +2

      Because the US doesn't need to defend its borders

    • @jaythomas3224
      @jaythomas3224 2 роки тому

      Offense: imagine that

    • @Jewel_Screaming_Chango8387
      @Jewel_Screaming_Chango8387 2 роки тому

      As a mma and Bjj coach
      A great offense Is the best defense so
      USA isn’t wrong

  • @Kaxcer
    @Kaxcer 2 роки тому +14

    Hypersonic weapons are overrated.
    They are good to counter US missile defences.
    Hovewer chinese missile defences are pathetic so US doesnt need them.

    • @mobiuszero2424
      @mobiuszero2424 2 роки тому +1

      yeah sure, but both party have enough nukes to destroy each other, thats enough reason to not start a war

    • @themacso4157
      @themacso4157 2 роки тому +3

      One hipersonic missile can take down a carrier. Beware of your hybris

    • @Kaxcer
      @Kaxcer 2 роки тому

      @@mobiuszero2424 Same was true during Cold war, and there were many proxy wars. Vietnam, Korea and many others.

    • @thanmawiachhangte1544
      @thanmawiachhangte1544 2 роки тому

      Another Proxy war here we go

    • @Kaxcer
      @Kaxcer 2 роки тому +4

      @@themacso4157 you believe its that easy ? Just one missile and carrier is dead ?
      Carrier can take pounding. You will need multiple hits to sink a carrier.

  • @Anomize23
    @Anomize23 2 роки тому

    Doesn’t matter who has the most. Strategy always wins.

    • @Harrizist
      @Harrizist 2 роки тому

      🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

  • @hermanrogers1325
    @hermanrogers1325 2 роки тому

    As long as they don’t fight it here in America

  • @silveriver9
    @silveriver9 2 роки тому +6

    The US has 800+ military bases around the world. It is the US we should be worried about. The US has been at war 93% of the time - 227 out of 245 years - since its founding in 1776. i.e. the U.S. has only been at peace for less than 20 years total since its birth.

  • @southbisikmixtv5015
    @southbisikmixtv5015 2 роки тому +5

    Long live USA we love USA n Taiwan from the Indian 🇮🇳 God bless USA and ezrel from the Indian 🇮🇳 we fully support

  • @zch7345
    @zch7345 2 роки тому

    Indeed "experience" is a critical core element for a successful campaign at such level. Numbers is merely a tool of intimidaton. Super Power status has to be earned via rigorous campaigns time & again. America is the great general of the trade.
    However, landscape have changed. Tremendous leap is brought about by Technology and its evolutionary pace is astounding. One can operate his programmed Supersonic cocktails from the comfort of his own little rest room than traditional blood sweating battle field.

  • @regard2826
    @regard2826 2 роки тому

    are you able to reverse this inflation situation or is there politics about this

    • @schleybailey
      @schleybailey 2 роки тому

      Inflation causes a different problem: malinvestment. Due to inflationary currency investor behavior changes and a crash is required to correct those changes (put money/effort where it needs to go). All this because happened because we listened to Keynes and were taught to idolize FDR in school.

  • @user-cp4jb5oz4c
    @user-cp4jb5oz4c 2 роки тому +15

    The U.S. has already lost.
    Those of you that don't realize this, just wait .
    🇷🇺🇨🇳 coalition 👍
    Plus more allies than the U.S.ever had.
    It'll be quik.

    • @joecater894
      @joecater894 2 роки тому

      no one wins a nuclear war. ... just remember that... it might be quick.. but there won't be much left.

    • @cedriceric9730
      @cedriceric9730 2 роки тому

      China Russia coalition is fake 😂.
      They don't need each other in the least .
      Russia is a rogue state tired of super powers interfering in it's bullying and China is seriously aspiring to be a " global leader which enevitably means it will have to put Russia in it's place sooner or later.
      They may unite against the likes of Japan but nothing more

    • @user-cp4jb5oz4c
      @user-cp4jb5oz4c 2 роки тому

      @@cedriceric9730 you are deranged!!

    • @user-rq9xi1se8v
      @user-rq9xi1se8v 2 роки тому +1

      @@cedriceric9730 我是一名中国人 我们国家的民意就是护卫领土 无心做世界第一领导者 但是也绝对不会被所谓的世界第一去支配

    • @phantless2203
      @phantless2203 2 роки тому

      Yea has half the world as allies lol ru dum

  • @huwantamad343
    @huwantamad343 2 роки тому +6

    I thought india is the second from usa ,india is the most advanced and powerfull in military than China as you read the comments of indian key warriors and their channel .

    • @g.l.9517
      @g.l.9517 2 роки тому +10

      If that is true, how India loss the first and the only war with China decade's ago at the border. Few months ago India could not even put it own satellite into orbit. The rocket went up few feet than dropped back to the launch pad. Furthermore, India's first home built aircraft carrier during its maiden overage was leaking oil and needed to be towed back to the shipyard for repair.
      The most recent war, the India army trying to invade China border again and China army captured quite a few India soldiers and blind fold them then paraded they and put the video in the new media; that really disturbing PM Midi.

    • @user-cf9np9cy8q
      @user-cf9np9cy8q Рік тому +1

      No 😆😁

  • @gerritfourie2239
    @gerritfourie2239 2 роки тому

    ,,,, being OUTCLASSED is INEXCUSABLE

  • @chee-liekho5860
    @chee-liekho5860 2 роки тому +2

    Comparing hard ware is irrelevant. The Talibans, with no airforce nor Navy and not even have boots and helmets, can beat the US. In the previous Korean war and Vietnam war US lost to ill equipped armies.

    • @g.l.9517
      @g.l.9517 2 роки тому

      Big different between the China's and the US military personnel is that the China's military personnel are pledged to serve the country and is willing to die for it. Where the US military personnel is all volunteers and paid for with a sign up bonus approximately of US $10,000. They will not consider to die in the battlefield as a option; especially the battlefield is at a foreign soil. That is why the US loss all those wars they started in the foreign soil.

    • @xxfrosty609xx3
      @xxfrosty609xx3 2 роки тому

      Tbf, no other country can fight a war on the other side of the planet for 20 years.

  • @willrobinson9767
    @willrobinson9767 2 роки тому +6

    As expected you know absolutely nothing about either country.....

  • @xiaomingguo6826
    @xiaomingguo6826 2 роки тому +49

    When the US constantly keeps a carrier fleet in the South China Sea, it is imaginable that China will increase its arsenal to a level comparable to that of the US. This is common sense. The US has a nuclear arsenal ten times that of China. China never invades the US but the US has invaded China in 1900 and had its navy in Shanghai until 1949. The US lost China in 1949 and has never won a war with China since then, not in the Korea War nor the Vietnam War.

    • @stewartbeche686
      @stewartbeche686 2 роки тому +14

      America beat china in korea and if wanted to could have nuked china. Vietnam an american victory.....1973 america stopped helping s.vietnam in war. 1975 n.vietnam took the south: AMERICA NOT THERE.....AMERICA DID NOT INVADE CHINA..IN 1900 WHAT ARE YOU DOING ON YOU TUBE ? COMMUNIST GOVERNMENT DONT WANT PEOPLE KNOW THE TRUTH. TROLL!!!!

    • @stewartbeche686
      @stewartbeche686 2 роки тому +4

      @Soshan Ihsan-Otty yes vietnam and japan once enemies of America........now united against imperialist China.

    • @thelastpetrolbender2744
      @thelastpetrolbender2744 2 роки тому +7

      @@stewartbeche686 What did USA achieve in the Korea war? Nothing really, to have a stalemate when USA has bombers ,artillery and 100 times better weapon than China, and Chinese forces didn’t even have enough machine gun. USA also has support from 12 other countries so is 12 countries forces VS China, still a stalemate. That is one lost war for USA. USA didn’t nuke China because China also have invented their own nuke. San Francisco go boom boom if USA nuke China, because soviet and China will nuke Americas pants off:)

    • @thelastpetrolbender2744
      @thelastpetrolbender2744 2 роки тому +4

      @@stewartbeche686 Chinese military ship sailing around Japan recently and USA or Japan didn’t do shit, they are smarter than you knows not to provoke China

    • @stewartbeche686
      @stewartbeche686 2 роки тому +1

      @@thelastpetrolbender2744 japan sent out planes and ships......we will fight china and win

  • @arnster1499
    @arnster1499 2 роки тому +2

    Americas military is full of strange people? China to win😎

    • @g.l.9517
      @g.l.9517 2 роки тому +1

      Big different between the China's and the US military personnel is that the China's military personnel are pledged to serve the country and is willing to die for it. Where the US military personnel is all volunteers and paid for with a sign up bonus approximately of US $10,000. They will not consider to die in the battlefield as a option; especially the battlefield is at a foreign soil. That is why the US loss all those wars they started in the foreign soil.

  • @nrao8977
    @nrao8977 2 роки тому +1

    Since when did CRUX and WOIN become experts yo comment on such topics?

    • @howelau1123
      @howelau1123 2 роки тому

      They are U S. Funded site and Ametican arse kisser.

  • @ramakurunaathanveeraian2520
    @ramakurunaathanveeraian2520 2 роки тому +7

    Well I respect China

    • @g.l.9517
      @g.l.9517 2 роки тому +1

      For all those past decades, China has NOT start any war to any nations in the World. Where the US had started many war in the name of democracy then killed million of unarmed, innocent human being and never get blame as war criminals. what a shame !!!!!

  • @btingey
    @btingey 2 роки тому +10

    At any given time the US has at least four ICBM submarines, undetected, off the coast of China. Each carries 24 Trident missiles and each of those can carry 8 high yield nuclear warheads. Those missiles can travel 7500 miles at 18,000 miles per hour (that’s 300 miles a minute). If the decision was made, in 15 minutes all 127 Chinese military bases as well as their 500 largest cities including 87% of their population could be vaporized. If you don’t want to use nucs... a couple cruise missiles hitting the three gorges dam would wipe out the 400,000,000 people living below and the majority of China’s industrial base. China is the most vulnerable country on earth and is surrounded by enemies...

    • @finddeniro
      @finddeniro 2 роки тому

      True...QT..quiet knowledge...

    • @Zakaius
      @Zakaius 2 роки тому +1

      One of the 4 knocked into a fixed undersea object & needed towing back to base. 😂😂
      Your assumption is of the Vietnam War era & the results is known. Underestimating your enemy is the first flaw in warfare.

    • @user-rq9xi1se8v
      @user-rq9xi1se8v 2 роки тому

      @@Zakaius 潜艇互撞

    • @ex0duzz
      @ex0duzz 2 роки тому +1

      Lol no, a few conventional cruise missile at 3 gorges is not going to kill 400,000,000 Chinese. Are you dumb? Even nukes wouldn't. You would kill more launching nukes directly at the cities.
      But after that be prepared for Chinese nuclear subs to also be nuking American cities, along with road mobile ICBM and also hypersonic orbital bombardment from space.

  • @bugstomper4670
    @bugstomper4670 2 роки тому +1

    3:11 That's not very stealthy.

  • @SebastianSanchez-sb6vz
    @SebastianSanchez-sb6vz 2 роки тому

    Videos about army strength comparison are completely pointless when a single pressing of a button can decide the fate of humankind.

  • @supermansg1
    @supermansg1 2 роки тому +5

    Ok. OK. USA very powerful and have very advanced weapons etc. But who won the Korean War & Vietnam War?? Who get the US to retreat to 38 line and 17 line?? Ha Ha....

    • @goda7137
      @goda7137 2 роки тому +1

      The Korean war was a draw. Vietnam was can be winable is just the US hit by political swift. The best option for us to not let these country to have actual war "All-Out War" just like World War I & II. It will be devastating for all of us much nuke is involve to matter. And recently the Afghan war, the Taliban was hiding for 20 years in the mountains and Pakistan. It only take US 2 weeks to destroy the Taliban in 2001. You understand the situation, look right now Taliban government is asking for recognition of the US. But the US is evil also they are no saint.

    • @user-in5kc9eu8b
      @user-in5kc9eu8b 2 роки тому +1

      @@goda7137 nah ..to china is a clear win . because when china army frist meet us army. is at China's border. when the war end ,it is at 38 line....that means china army push us army from border to 38line.... clear win!

    • @goda7137
      @goda7137 2 роки тому

      @@user-in5kc9eu8b 😉

  • @kedaklungnewme1692
    @kedaklungnewme1692 2 роки тому +3

    U S A has more experience in war.They have been using middle East as thier trianing ground for the past 20 years .

    • @andrewc3551
      @andrewc3551 2 роки тому +4

      and they lost to tribal Taliban

    • @Hmonks
      @Hmonks 2 роки тому

      @@andrewc3551 politically see the difference.

    • @g.l.9517
      @g.l.9517 2 роки тому +1

      If the US is so much more experience in war, then how the hell the US could loss all those wars in the foreign soil ?? The Korea war, the Vietnam War, the middle east wars, and the recent 20 year war in Afghanistan. US military personnel could not fight even with all those high tech weapons. When a person is dumb, no matter how much training, they would still remain dumb.

    • @nekopop8159
      @nekopop8159 Рік тому

      @@andrewc3551 No it was the Afghanistan army that lost, USA left but the Afghanistan army couldn’t fight back

  • @daveandbambifans6920
    @daveandbambifans6920 2 роки тому

    This is how military danger works

  • @socalfishing3121
    @socalfishing3121 2 роки тому

    has anyone else noticed at the 1:41 mark that all of the solders are fake in the tanks they are almost like dummy's with heads that turn all at once

  • @samad3251
    @samad3251 2 роки тому +4

    China is atleast 40 years behind USA in terms of military technology.

    • @wildwildwest9588
      @wildwildwest9588 2 роки тому +2

      where is that 40years advance technology when taliban vs america war? lol china has the most advance weapons today,

    • @fortunapalace6653
      @fortunapalace6653 2 роки тому +1

      You must have your head in the sand in the last 10 yrs China & USA one on one conventional war, no western gangs, you be surprised.

  • @thorodinson8755
    @thorodinson8755 2 роки тому +4

    what happened to ussr will also happen to china sooner or later mark my words😒

    • @mrsmith3403
      @mrsmith3403 2 роки тому +3

      INDIA will spilt first , it made up of 500 countries and with so many different languages cant even communicate with each others.

    • @regularhuman95
      @regularhuman95 2 роки тому +1

      @@mrsmith3403 But we Indians have sense of belonging, we are very different from each other true, but we are united because of our culture and history.

    • @josh6567
      @josh6567 2 роки тому

      @@mrsmith3403 im no indian but i know for that the country of India and its people are far better than that fcking xinnie the pooh! That china will get decimated by the world and thats for sure. Its only a matter of time!

    • @mrsmith3403
      @mrsmith3403 2 роки тому +2

      @@regularhuman95
      UNITED? The CASTE SYSTEM? You can even share the same toilet.

    • @regularhuman95
      @regularhuman95 2 роки тому +1

      @@mrsmith3403 Dude do you really think 1.4 billion people are all casteist??? It exists but not everyone hates low caste people. Its like saying everyone in America is dumb and racist, because of the few who actually are. Casteist problem exists in backward areas and villages, just like Southern part of US is pretty racist and dumb.

  • @silentwatcher1455
    @silentwatcher1455 2 роки тому +2

    Can US last 25 years of protracted war? Can US afford to lose 300,000 men?You can only compare but can't guarantee who will be the winner.

    • @jamessmaby8758
      @jamessmaby8758 2 роки тому +1

      The Free people of the US have more weapons than the US Army and Chinese army combined !

    • @g.l.9517
      @g.l.9517 2 роки тому

      Big different between the China's and the US military personnel is that the China's military personnel are pledged to serve the country and is willing to die for it. Where the US military personnel is all volunteers and paid for with a sign up bonus approximately of US $10,000. They will not consider to die in the battlefield as a option; especially the battlefield is at a foreign soil. That is why the US loss all those wars they started in the foreign soil.

  • @codewalters
    @codewalters 2 роки тому

    Interested to know how China and India stack up.

  • @keqing311
    @keqing311 2 роки тому +3

    No matter which side u taking on
    Everyone will suffer

  • @bhupinderbangabanga4047
    @bhupinderbangabanga4047 2 роки тому +5

    Its American quality vs Chinese quantity.Quality always win.support from india

  • @kamalchakraborty6026
    @kamalchakraborty6026 2 роки тому

    War is not a solution peace is.

  • @gcavinashthakur3973
    @gcavinashthakur3973 2 роки тому

    music name please

  • @TimmyTheTimeTraveler
    @TimmyTheTimeTraveler 2 роки тому +3

    The US will have a better edge if they had a president with working brain cells.

  • @shreyambhattacharjee998
    @shreyambhattacharjee998 2 роки тому +7

    Anyone can hardly ever match the military might of Uncle Sam!

  • @britishbatman8598
    @britishbatman8598 2 роки тому

    🔥Mankind will end this world & nothing else, if we scrap every weapon in our time,our planet would be a much better place for our future 🙏🏾

  • @karyhenderson1938
    @karyhenderson1938 2 роки тому

    Same old adage that all things are made to be understood,no matter how the argument goes.