No matter what your answer is, whether Creator or Big Bang, at some point, it had to have came from nothing. Who created the Creator? If he was eternal and always just here, then why can't the "stuff" that made the big bang also be eternal and always just here, ready to make those interactions? And if it's a simulation, same answer, then the real universe still has to struggle with those answers.
Come on, everybody knows, it's the Christian God who did it. All the other endless Gods were/are fake. Only Jesus and his Dad and his uncle Allah... are real! It's gotta be those three Holy Trinities. They said so, too, in their HOLY BOOKS, the Bible and the Koran. And they also ask a very logical question, to those who don't believe them: If it's not WE --- Jesus, God, and All ---- then who? After all, SOMEBODY gotta do it. Everyone knows, for example --- a trivial example but a sound one nonetheless --- if you throw trash around, someone has got to clean it; trash don't disappear into thin air on their own. Someone has to pick up that trash & put it in the trash can! Everything works like that. Even 4 year-old's know that! Only very stupid Liberals, who are into Satan and his brothers, Lucifer and the Devil, would deny the fact that Jesus, his Dad/God, and his Uncle Allah --- who have ALWAYS EXISTED --- created everything, from virtual particles to galaxies and super clusters and sheets of billions of galaxies.... And, yes, HEAVEN, too, where Jesus, his holy Mother, the Jewish Virgin girl, all the angles and archangels and the thousands of European saints the Pope/Catholic Church has beatified over the last 2,000 years.... P.S., as I've said, all the other Gods by all the other stupid, primitive tribes from the beginning of time until today... they're all fakes. Jesus said, in the Bible, he came down to the Middle East, at the height of the Universe, sent by his Dad, God, which is Jesus himself in another form, in Heaven.... and that he's the ONLY REAL DEAL!
science is the route of matter being left for infinity which evenutallly leads to a random explosion called the big bang (this cycle will repeat forever). religion is the route that god forced that matter together and shaped it himself (this in theory only happens once).
@@stormryder4305 the cause is infinity. wait long enough and matter will take every form possible including the forms of bombs. eventually an explosion big enough to overcome gravity will take place and boom big bang. infinity is basically a cheat code.
we really can't understand quantum reality that we can actually study and measure, e.g. wave/particle natures, quantum entanglement etc. Yes we can predict and mathematically model it but there is no "real world" mapping or analogy to imagine what we are observing there. So the universe is orders of magnitude less intelligible.
Yes we can, that's what many people say about their God, and some say it about our universe, the reason we believe in the big bang is bc we've observed that everything is moving away from eachother and tracking back those trajectories through time results in a single point
@@watarimono17 None. Op just stated the principle of energy conservation, based on mathematics equation. And it is the first law of thermodynamics: Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. Like OP said, it just exists.
inifnite acceleration gives the brain the ability to grasp/fahom infinite space -infinite acceleration of space as opening sequence of an infinite universe where planets are fed with stellar wind and stars and galaxies are fed with cosmic radiation (cosmic radiation origin by entropy -as an infinete universe filled with cosmic radiation is of lower energy than an infinite vakuum)
The concept of before and after the Universe is beyond what our minds can conceive. We can only function within boundaries, be them physical, ethereal or other.
I don't know. I think my drawing of what I think is beyond the universe's expansion boundary is quite comprehensive. And I have plenty of hypothesis about before and after our universe. I don't think it's incomprehensible for our brains, but it does stretch our brains ability and most likely can't fathom it very well. Like I think before our universe there was a singularity in a sea of dark matter billions maybe even trillions of lightyears away from another sigularity or even another "universe". Time has always been a forward momentum even before the big bang. This singularity that would eventually become our universe would blink in and out of existence, like a quantum fluctuation, until it finally stabilized in spacetime and expanded into our universe.
Well, I don't think it is what our minds can't conceive a before and an after, neither we can only live with boundaries. Our species have thrived and still are thriving thinking beyond boundaries, imagine the unimaginable and make it happen... And that started with creating fire... Our mind (ego) is simply fouling itself by thinking everything has a beginning and an end. But simply put energy can't be created neither can be lost. Every single atom in yours or mine body is made out of stardust... What ever make us 'US' or our soul or consciousness, or whatever living creature we presume without, cannot be anything else than energy... Think about that... We're not just spectators to an unimaginable large maybe indefinite universe, we're a conscious living part of it. Hence I don't care in whatever god one believes in or philosophy one follows, because - one way or the other - they ALL tell the same story, that NEVER was disproven: Energy doesn't get lost... It's just transforms into something else... It's the commonly accepted understanding and concept of energy but whoever proves that wrong - aka energy does get lost at some point (even for a tiny bit) instead of being transformed into something else, not only wins a Nobel prize, but also proves every religion or philosophy to be wrong... Plus any interstellar traveling ;)
But that puts our universe within boundaries. Or our universe as part of a multiverse. The problem is trying to imagine why or how anything exists at all. @@InfiniteSkiegh
@ricf9592 Not really. The "sea of dark matter" is infinite and serves as a medium for the stabilization of singularities (formed in black holes [why it "blinks"... at least until the black hole is destroyed or evaporates. It's outside time until it's not being "fed". The infinite density of a singularity warps space time so drastically it's like it breaks it's tie to it. ] The absence of the black hole is what then allows the singularity to expand into a "universe". Watch Kurzgesagt's video"what happens if we destroyed a black hole?" For more info on black holes and their singularities. ) to appear and serves as a multiversal plane for the creation of "universes". It is within a brane (the higher dimensional plane that contains the multiversal plain of our universe (sea of dark matter) and particles probably are exchanged between them in a looping infinite system. They probably aren't even these domino shapes we imagine, but 4th or 5th dimensional objects which we have trouble perceiving. (Look up 4th dimensional object moving through 3rd dimensional space.) I don't think we need to have an explanation of an infinity complex that just is. It has no beginning or end, past and present are illusions. We are just traveling it moment by moment because this 3 dimensional form only allows us to experience it that way. Obviously we have no proof for any of this, but this is where my logic has brought me from the existential crisis I've been having since I was 10. 😅 I've put so much thought into this subject since I was a child and realized I was a projection of chemistry and 99.9999% empty space...you too...and the phone I'm typing on and you reading and the earth we're standing on...all 99.9999999999% empty space
science is about 'what we know so far', so to say something is impossible is saying that we have bypassed the future discoveries and reached absolute knowledge.
@@louseveryann2181 Apply scientific analysis and get your answer. I have a sinus headache and thus cannot answer from a scientific perspective right now but it can be deduced.
If E = MCxc , then matter = Energy/ CXC. So matter has to be generated by action of light, in particulate state interacting with energy can generate mass.
True, but that's not a problem to be solved in physics or any branch of science. All why questions still require how questions. Otherwise, they are only hypotheses still in search of greater understanding. You won't have all the modern discoveries and technology science offers. You will give up a lot.
@@kkap895 Maybe so, but maybe not. There's no proof either way. But space and time cannot exist without something in it to measure. If something was always there, that implies there was always time and something inside some volume of space. That also makes no sense. To have no beginning to everything we see. Nothing could be as logical an explanation as anything else, hard though it is to grasp the concept.
The answer is of itself - having a little light and dark - spinning slowly - while absorbing itself - within. It nothing but - an amazing anarchy of meaning. Maybe releasing - more salient questions - but without answers, of course. This has been - discussed before. There - chew gently - on that. (Pineapple and coconut flavour) Hee hee (Just having a bit of ) Like your answer, though) Fare thee well @@Anarchy-Is-Liberty
The big bang never happened... and as for your Question the beginning is never the end... the end is never the beginning... limitless the cosmos are... humanity is kentic and mathematics cannot fathom... humanity is adolescent.
Our understanding of physics is bound by the limits of our observations. As we push the limits of what we can observe, we might discover that the universe is fantastical, whimsical, and unpredictable beyond anything our understanding of science has so far constrained us to.
Bro, Universe is created by God ( creator ) . Now,some people question who created God . My answer is Creator ( God ) is self created i know it sound strange that how something is created without any creator . But Universe, Galaxies, solar systems, planets and Life forms and all other piece of creations is created by almighty God /King .On the other hand , Understanding The source of Creation is like Group of Ants solving maths Construction Practicle Geometry Chapter . If the Single piece of Creation is so Complex then just imagine the Creator ( God ) Who made Billion , trillions piece of those complex pieces of creation complexity . Single human is jigsaw puzzle of 7 octillion pieces 😅😂😂😂😂.
@@InfiniteSkiegh and even a vacuum is something, otherwise you wouldn’t call it a vacuum. See it as the number 0. It’s not nothing. It implies it is 1 or -1 or something in between. But it still is a zero.
The notion of infinity , and the older one- of eternity, features. Old beliefs morph into the obvious. The metals and chemicals in our earthly space can be wrought in a number of remarkable ways. {How else could I be talking to you right now!} There seems to be a purpose and a rationale for existence.
Ever wondered where all that material goes that black holes gobble up, the billions of planets stars and asteroids that get absorbed over billions of years, well it has to somewhere! perhaps it finally explodes creating a new universe in a different dimension.
That material is what makes up the black hole. Black holes are just very dense balls of matter, to which the sucked up matter is added. It's only a 'hole' in the sense that, since no light can escape, they seem like a dark area in the sky, only visible through the high energy activity that goes on near it's event horizon.
Something wouldn't be anything without nothing. Your so-called geniuses are all wrong. Everything you think you know is wrong also. For these reasons you will never figure it out nor will your precious AI. Good luck with all that.
I was an experimental quantum physicist back in the 70’s and studied atomic and molecular collisions. I would calculate the diffraction patterns produced by these collisions without Schrödinger wave equations using simple geometry and Stoke’s law with other fundamental physical laws with a calculator. Never was the wave function even part of the calculation. Remember I actually experimented with real particles interacting with each other. I wasn’t some theoretician locked up in a cubicle with a pencil and paper. I argued with every physicist that would dare challenge me since the best they could say was, well you just don’t understand the mathematical equations used in quantum physics. Needless to say I left physics and became a pilot and had loads of fun and made a lot of money for only working a fraction, a little fraction, of the time. Now I listen to these ridiculous theories that are unprovable and remember Ptolemy and the geocentric of solar system model which used elaborate gears and geometric contraptions to predict the positions of the planets. It didn’t do a bad job. Then came Copernicus, Kepler and Einstein. See where I am going. All these theories are about the same level of that geocentric model and that elaborate contraption. We have not got a clue and until we know what dark energy and dark mass is and some “Copernicus” like physicists comes around all we do is come up with these theories. Virtual universe? Seriously. Stop watching the Matrix and get into a lab and leave that pad of paper and pencil at home.
Big Bang doesn't SAY the Universe came from nothing. This is classic Creationist strawman argument. Big Bang says that all the energy that makes up the Universe was compressed into a tiny singularity which expanded, and is still expanding. There is nothing in Big Bang about where that energy came from. "Before the beginning" is a meaningless phrase. Time & space came into being WITH the big Bang. There is no such thing as "before time" Whether the Big Bang was a one-off or a repeated Big Bounce, there is no "before the Big Bang" What has a first man or woman got to do with Big Bang? There were certainly no humans at the time of the Big Bang. There weren't even atoms at that stage, let alone life.
The Big Bang doesn’t say something came from nothing. It states that the universe was in an incredibly hot and dense state and 13.7 billion years ago it began to expand. It makes no claims about what came before the expansion. Maybe before you post a video you should learn about your subject matter.
I am fairly certain at this point, that the universe, and everything in it, including all of the people, are just imagined by me, and I am totally alone. What makes me so sure is that I can close my eyes, fall asleep, and all of this is gone, and I can create any universe I want during this time. Explain that away, if you can.
@@rexreynolds9203I know. My point is, that we create alternate realities in the mind, and some people don't know the difference between imagined and real.
Listening to this video is a waste of your time. The only benefit to listening to it is that it will demonstrate in a very small way how much no one knows about the universe, multiiverse or basic existence aside from what some have seen and tried to explain, but have failed time after time. Our language of communication among humans is insufficient to describe the complexity of what, how, when, where and why anything and everything exixts or does not exist. By using simplistic names for things not understood (i.e., black holes, dark energy, dark matter, etc.) the people who are intellectually superior to most of us in a number of ways continue to try to describe the indescribable that they do not and cannot know. Most of us have at some time come into direct contact with the earth when losing our grip or balance. So we know that there is some kind of attraction between us and the ground we normally stand on. What we don't know is what that attraction is composed of even though we may be able to use a mathematical equation to approximate it in quantifiable terms. So it shouldn't surprise anyone that there are many other processes on a much grander scale that we cannot calculate or posit how and why they exist. While there will continue to be heroic attempts to explain "existence" of everything, our gray matter will continue to be inadequate to explain the what, where, when, why and how of everything, anything and nothing that we desire to KNOW. We are inadequately equipped to understand, communicate and demonstrate those basic concepts, partly because our brains are inadequate and all the theories that have and will exist from our birth to our death will NEVER explain them. We will continueto to remain ignorant because the "answer(s)" are "simply not" and are "not simply" available to us.
It seems more logical that "big bangs" are common and that there was not A (unique) big bang. In fact, big bangs could be a lot more common than super nova occurring in "our" universe. Imagine a giant bottle of cola (space) and each bubble (universe) that forms is from another "big bang". Any intelligence that forms inside that bubble(universe) deduces that they are the only universe as they can never detect any other bubble.
"A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing" The creator (of this video) just shows here that he doesn't understand scientific terms like he thinks he does. He gets a LOT wrong in just the first minute. Laughable.
Dear Physics, please stop trying to find a theory of everything, the micro is a different world with different rules from the macro. But if trying to mix oil with water is your thing, then by all means continue. But because scientist cannot grasp the fact that Zero does not exist then you'll never figure it out, here is a clue, zero is nothing more then a boundary and until is considered as such all your physics will remain incorrect, that's why you cant figure it out.
@eyeq7730 yes I can't imagine a limited universe. What is outside it I would ask. Also impossible to understand infinity. Both are equally impossible to understand
I never believed in the big bang theory and believe the Universe is much older then what the big bang could have created. If you take a drop of water from the Pacific Ocean, that might begin to compare to how much we know about the Universe in comparison.
I once had a discussion with a biology expert. I asked how did all this start ? His reply, In the beginning there was nothing. And then some dust formed. My next question. Where did this dust come from ? He had a perplexed look on his face and then took off. Never talked about it again. It's absolute madness to say the universe came from nothing! Why not admit some massively brilliant being started it all. Who made her or him is another question.
The dust was and is and will be always, what's make the difference is the Will which starts anything. It's like a light, you swicht on and you see, without your will to switch, the Nothing remain. The Light makes the difference bewteen Nothing and Thing. Well... many hebrew linguistics gems is genesis 1.1 and following, not revealed in the bible with their vulgare foreign translations.
Why not admit there's a god, is what you're saying. Because there's no proof. You can't just admit something without evidence. Her or Him? Thats a human label. You cannot label god male or female. Stop posting comments. It's for the best of everybody.
Your comment makes no sense. You criticize the dust coming from nothing, but you jump right to God existing and put off answering how God was created. The same logic can be used for the dust. Where did the dust come from? That's another question so let's just believe it for now. Do you see how ridiculous that is? Believe that which has evidence and dismiss the rest. "God" is easily dismissed as mere conjecture.
What is amazing is that aside from Lawrence Krause explanation of nothing, no one in astrophysics or physics claims the universe came from nothing so your argument is stopped at the starting line.
All things have neither beginning nor end. What exists today is the result of the movement and change of all things. This process goes on continuously and forever...
Great theories which no one alive today are perhaps in the infinite future will ever be able to prove are disapprove so it is very easy to make them up. So that is why they are theories and always will be.
"Where is it written in adamantine that semi-carnivorous monkeys can or should be capable of understanding reality? That seems to be one of the first delusions, and one of the more prideful illusions of human culture, that a final understanding is possible in the first place." Terence McKenna
Lol no. This is also complete garbage. Pretending like it will never be understood because humans are monkeys (which is also bullcrap) is tarded. Terrence McKenna is a bullshitting edgelord.
I will say No, because the question of "how the universe was created" is a bit like the Turing test for AI: every time the problem is solved it gets redefined. Suppose that science someday nails down all the phenomenological details of the Big Bang to everyone's satisfaction; the question then becomes, "Are/were there other universes?" (This is already an active topic!) If that question is answered, "Yes, there is a Multiverse in which our universe is just one instance!" then the question becomes, "How did the Multiverse come into being?" Then suppose we someday find the answer to that question. There's certain to be an even more ambitious question one can ask about How/Why/Who? It's Turtles all the way down
could another universe collapsing cause the big bang? i mean the energy had to have come from somewhere. i don’t know how something that big could collapse on itself or what could cause it. i remember seeing something about it but i wonder how other people who know more think about it.
If we embrace the idea of the Big Bang, we find ourselves contemplating the nature of time itself. Might time be an unending river, flowing both backward and forward without constraints? Does the universe's timeline extend infinitely, inviting us to traverse its currents in exploration of the past and the future?
@@danielhone9910 I believe our senses have evolved to help us determine our surroundings, not that they are arbitrary, this includes our sense of time. For me, time is a mechanism of the observable universe and beyond, but it is much more complex and dynamic than we can currently perceive. I believe there are parallel universes with differing arrows of time, and these universes interact with ours gravitationally; dark matter is the gravitational effect of matter in temporally adjacent universes and dark energy is the effect of matter in relatively temporally inverse universes. I believe that blackholes are portals that pair with whiteholes in these parallel universes, and the Big Bang was one such white hole. The "beginning" of our universe will have been the "end" of at least one of the temporally inverse universes.
@@danielhone9910 Well, with my proposed cosmological model, there is no beginning. It's a branching cycle; our "universe" came from a white hole and will eventually be eaten by blackholes, and some of those black holes lead to big bangs in branching timelines and some to big bangs in a looping timeline that "ends" with the blackhole that caused our big bang. I reckon a lot of the branches operate similarly and loop back on themselves, while some may loop back to our big bang, and some may extend infinitely without "destruction." As for before the big bang initiated and after the final blackhole collapses in our observable space-time, I reckon there were other branching cycles, unless space-time itself is thoroughly propelled and swallowed by these connecting singularities.
@@danielhone9910 Yet I am spiritual, and I believe such a universe was a choice we made as spirit. I think function comes before form. We were a floating consciousness or "source" or "God" or whatever, and we chose to entertain ourself by splitting into infinite lives throughout infinite times and spaces, interconnected through the thought-form of all that is, what we are. We made this playground in an instant, a creation that was never created, a blip of an experience in a world without end.
@@danielhone9910 Thank you :) The part about us being a floating consciousness that chose creation is just intuitive to me and cannot be proven so it doesn't belong anywhere near scientific research, the cosmological model part is also intuitive to me and it baffles me that noone seems to be researching it, maybe they'll catch up, maybe I'm crazy lol
So then it would never end? There can’t be one without the other. Over trillions of years black holes will swallow everything. Over another trillion years through radiation decay particles will be gone and it will be a completely cold empty universe.
I am pleased to have gotten so many comments to my statements about how and why. When I was going to college and studying physics I kept wondering about the same questions. I got my masters degree in physics and then a doctor of law and still could not find an answer. Einstein once said " God doesn't play dice with the universe" questioning Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. He spent much of his life trying to find a unified field theory but never succeeded and it is his 2 math theories on which all of modern physics is based. In the 1930s there was another good physicist, I can't remember his name at the moment and am to lazy at the moment to look it up, who was also a friend of Einstein and he wanted to know what was the foundation on which math and physics rested. That has actually nothing to do with the question of whether God, whatever that means, but actually is a scientific inquiry about whether there is something on which all of the laws of physics rest. You can either blindly just say what these laws are or you can ask his question about whether there is a foundation which actually also exists under these laws. Quantum mechanics actually is also based on mathematics as is all of modern science, but even math is based on basic assumptions without any explanation of why its rules work. I admit that even at my present age of 80 I still have no answer in my own mind. I am still in love with physics and have followed it most of my life. I was an ashiest in my teens and 20s, but as I got older became less certain about whether or not there is any meaning to life and wound up an agnostic admitting to myself that I just do not know whether there is or is not a creative force behind everything, but I keep studying and trying to find an answer that I can accept. I suggest that you all need to keep an open mind to the question of why because it is actually a major issue in physics today being considered by many physicists.
Mathematics, which I love, is simplified language by way of numbers and values. E=mc2 is a lot more than those if in an actual math problem and definitely more if made into a sentence. Mathematics which are symbols, based off hypothetical values we can’t truly measure, involving things we have never and will never see, experience or measure probably/ possibly.
The universe is binary. At it's core, everything is made of positives and negatives. Even the tiniest particle we can detect, is made up of something smaller. Small enough, I imagine, to be undetectable by any means. Imagine a quark has millions of parts to it, every one is made up of clusters of positives and negatives. The clue to everything is found within a magnetic field. Imagine the sensation of a solid object being created by nothing but energy. I'm telling you now, that matter is not real. It is a sensation, for lack of a better word.
@@ThisThing435a scientific theory must be able to make successful predictions. Something having a hypothetical value. Does in no way diminish it's value. An hypothesis is not just a wild guess.
@@timhallas4275currently in physics the Planck length is the smallest we can go. I'm sending you a link that explains why that is believed to be the case. It also opens up another can of worms. The simulation theory. In base reality. There shouldn't be a limit to something being made up of something. But physics tells us that the Planck length is the limit. Which would make sense in a simulated reality.
The main problem with explaining the "beginning of physical reality" is the fact that the explanation requires using words and sentences. Words have specific meanings and sentences are necessarily incomplete requiring multiple sentences. Therefore, trying to explain this using words can imply that there is definite separation between ideas. Words like "The" vs. "A" implies that "the" is absolute and objective while "a" is relative and subjective. These subtle words create a lot of friction and disagreements that may not be real. A metaphysical explanation of "The Big Bang" would be that "before the Big Bang", what exists (always exists) is just "energy". By "energy", I mean that which defines existence itself. I am not referring to the term used in physics. "Energy" could also be called "consciousness", which is also misinterpreted depending on the context it is used. "Consciousness" in this case is simply the awareness of existence and the ability to act. This ability to act is what is called "potential energy". "Kinetic energy" is what happens after an action, or the result of an action. So just based on "energy", you have 2 states that can be understood: "before" and "after", "cause" and "effect". This observed state of "energy" creates the perception that there is time. So questions such as "what was before" or "what is the cause" comes from observation. However, how are you observing these states? Shouldn't the ability to be aware be the true question asked, rather than what caused something? The other issue is of the term "observation". "To observe" is not an optical action. It is the ability to be aware in a specific way. When one physically observes something, they become aware of a specific state. But this is also done without visual representations. One can become aware of any type of information. This ability to be aware of something is what exists as "energy". Going back to the idea of "Big Bang", what is observed, or the "energy" that always exists, can be seen as parts within the whole no matter how small you go. Those parts are acting independently within the "singularity" energy of the whole. This differentiation of the whole into parts creates the concept of action. If the whole acted, it would not change because it remains the whole. But if the parts acted, then each part is acting independently of the other parts and the awareness of the whole changes. Thus, you have difference. This difference within the whole can be observed by what each individual part does and becomes. Again, this "observing" must occur somehow. If there is only "energy", then this "energy" must be the observer, and it is observing itself. Since there is only "energy", there is only "itself", and what "it" observes, is the parts of "itself". What each part does "creates" something new because the creation is change or "transforming" (in reality, it is becoming aware of something it was not aware of before). These parts can be considered the "particles" of physical reality. Those particles that came together to form larger particles is simply each part interacting and cooperating with other parts. These new parts are the result of cooperation between parts. From a metaphysical perspective, this is likened to growing in awareness or "consciousness". This growing of consciousness happens because something new is experienced. Having been a single part, now becoming a larger part is an experience of the individual parts. It was not, but now it is, before and after, cause and effect. All questions about matter and the observed form is merely a way to represent the parts. The more parts that cooperate to form a larger part changes the awareness of itself relative to the other parts. Transformation does not mean energy is ever lost or degraded except as the physically observed form of energy (heat, electromagnetic signatures, etc). You cannot see the true "energy" since it is what's doing the observing. The physically observed representation of energy implies linear time by the way change is represented. The visual representations create the perception of a continuous sequence, but what if the sequence isn't one change to another change, and instead is one state to another state, both states already existing in potential? The act of observing that state would "actualize" it into reality. So what changed isn't the whole or the parts as if they are physical things. Instead, the awareness changed and depending on what point of view you're talking about, it will appear as before and after. You can call this point of view as dimensions or levels of awareness. There are many new-age concepts that discuss this (this is not saying "new-age" information is infallable), but the general point is that the closer you get to the perspective from the whole "energy", the less you are aware of change since "everything" must include everything that can exist, and thus there cannot be anything that has not existed except through a lack of awareness. This is how "everything" can experience being "everything", by being the parts that represents every thing. But from the perspective of each thing, it cannot know every thing, thus the lack of awareness allows the "whole" to experience itself by experiencing itself from the point of view of each part. The "creator" concept, or "God", is no different to the singularity concept of the "Big Bang", except as people attribute a personality to the concept. "God" in religious terms has become "energy" personified because of the religious teachings, not because it is that way. The single undifferentiated "creator" is the whole energy that is existence itself, but there is no human point of view for "God" except from the parts within. Creation is not limited to just one perspective or experience. Therefore, infinite potential cannot be represented by any single personification because that would be creating "God" in the image of man. The idea that man is in the image of "God" is that humans have awareness and potential, just as every thing else in existence. The part of the whole that is also aware, can create as well, not in visual terms, but from its actions that can change the awareness of itself. Removing the personification, which is because of the lack of awareness, means there is no such thing as "creation". Rather, everything is an experience of becoming aware.
I'm going with Theory 4 . Every time I see one of those life after death stories they mostly say "They took me and shown me other worlds or parts of this world." Then they put them back on earth to live longer with these crazy thoughts. That's what a kid in his/her basement would do to punk people on their planet.
I go with theory 3, infinite multiverses. I have had intimations of this possibility, even of subtle changes within the reality such as we know it. The situation we are dealing with may also be being affected by the machinations at the Large Hadron Collider, down to and including newly defined and discovered quarks.
@@Geoplanetjane your comment about the large hadron collider indicates your lack of understanding of what they do there. They are recreating interactions that already occur constantly in our universe, just in a way where we can observe them. Believing that the "machination" of CERN's work causing structural changes in our universe is like believing that a black hole may form because you put electricity in a light bulb.
Which ever theory you consider, non of them explain why anything exists at all. By this I mean that theories all assume that some thing has always existed from which space and time operate but the real question is whether they have always existed for infinity. In the end it will all eventually come down to the question of not why any form of reality exists and instead it comes down to the issue of whether there is a beginning or there never was a beginning and that may be unanswerable no matter how much progress we make in physics.
It's beyond bizarre to think of a beginning and an end... The Big Bang probably was the beginning for us... But then scientist say both the Universe is expanding (even beyond light speed) and will - ultimately - collapse in itself again... And that - for me - sounds plausible, one big black hole that contains the entire universe, unable to contain itself and turns into one big white hole and that process repeating itself over and over again, infinitely... But because of whatever happens in a black hole, doesn't exclude a multiverse; instead this process would imo make it far more likely for those to exists...
In the vastness of infinity nothing or something is essentially the same thing. There's no reason to assume nothing should be the default state because you're applying our logical understanding of time and space when the properties of the vast state beyond our perspective could be completely inconceivable and something could have just always existed.
Very well done video. I have been interested in this things since shildhood, but still at62 its more and more fashinating for me. I have no degrees in psysics as a psycologist, and agnostic person. So i am still waiting for a video like this including the thougths of some kind of spiritual dimension, not yet discovered but maybe could explain more of these very complicated things. If there are some kind of dimensions with "spirits" that is not demanding a God, just a continue of Darwins evolution, that we dont need psycial bodies anymore, that could maybe?? be one more key to comming nearer the truth, but the whole truth is as i believe not possible for a very long time, or never??? Already at age 12 i start to think that something must exist, even emptyness is something like you say in the video with things sporadicly comes and then just disappapears! I live in sweden therefore my rather bad english. If i should guess, whice theory is right! I have no clue att al, but Einsteins famous " everything is realitive" is the king of al sayings. We are trapped in our dimension, but like radiowavawes "something" not found yet is surrounding us. Without our ability to notice it. Please do simular videoes and ad the spiritual things to the physics. Thanks for a very well done video 🥰
Wot~? A non-existing Nothing in the middle of nowhere suddenly explodes for no reason and creates the universe, and you can't understand that? Sheesh ... and they call ME dum ...
Great video, I love the way you ask the big, big questions but without asserting that science can provide the ultimate answers and leave room for doubt, even about the Big Bang itself. I don't believe science alone can provide the ultimate answers, the answers are probably bigger than the questions and to coin a phrase "passeth all understanding".
Because we say God did it. Doesn't make us liars or wrong. Because we truly do not know but I'd rather believe in something then nothing at all. And a God loving us is so bad? Like they say in the good book. Why is that such a bad thought or thing to believe?
@@JoshuaWilliams-dj2co So.."The Flying Spaghetti Monster did it" also fulfills your criteria. I would prefer to know the truth than believe in your nothing (god). A "loving god" would not have drowned humanity, would not torture people for eternity. Your god advocates for slavery. And the bible is a horrendous read, it is hardly the "good book".
Uau! Really good video!! 🙏🙏 The vacuum bubble idea is getting closer to the possible outcome of something out from nothing but to hold this negative pressure the universe needs a strong and robust "sphere" arround it self (not excluing other forms of containers) and it is hard to occur naturaly... but still, Nature overtakes its own limits!!
Questions do not transcend time. Time existed before human thought. Just because you claim not to know the answer does not mean no one knows the answer. There is no existence without time. We experienced time through our star the sun. Read more non-fiction. Take a break from the pseudoscience and study linguistics. Work on your syntax. Upgrade your dialect. Respect semantics. Your vocabulary is outdated. 0:45
Exactly, the super-massive black hole that is our universe decided to explode in this region thereby “creating” its own space/time bubble in which we exist today
Something cannot come out of nothing, except of course if there are various layers of reality, in which case it emerges from a another layer, one we cannot perceive. Regardless there are other theories that do address the holes in these theories, but science has blinded itself to their possibilities.
"Something cannot come out of nothing" How sure are you of this? It is not something that can be experimentally verified. You see, we have no "nothing" so we can not test it to see what it can or can not do.
Theory 5, God is the sum of all energy, conscious, and unified. He then alters His geometry creating the void, and encapsulates the vacuum He created, leaving a small fraction of His energy in the void to condense into matter, which is both energy, and quasi energy, a quantum conscious dualistic reality in which humans are engaged in a proof test, and God has allowed Himself to be extorted by the one who executed His will to extort. God has to allow experiential knowledge, and skin in the game to allow us free will to prove our allegiance, and, for God to prove His Love, by sacrificing Himself to fulfill the Divine Legal Contract of payment for the extortion where humans are pawns to the enemy. Is this so hard to believe?
The Big Bang doesn't say the universe came from nothing. It says everything that exists was densely compacted into a tiny space know as a singularity. Your thumbnail is misleading.
Another aimless video discussion about a pointless question. We will never know the answer. So just live with that and accept it. Endless regression leads nowhere.
The big bang theory never stated the universe came from nothing just at time dident know about anti mater or even quarks and higs bosons so couldn't say what could of started it but to day we can guess it was an interaction between matter and anti matter of some sorts that corsed basically a galactic static discharge wich set the hole thing in motion as anti matter turned into mater
What people don't grasp is When they say "big bang" that does not mean a fiery explosion, it means a very rapid expansion in space-time from a very tiny point, infinitely smaller than a pinhead. Many scientists have answered this subject many years ago and you can find a plethora of explanations from people who specialise in the subject of what basic elements are in that tiny pinhead.
If it's objective it ain't infinite. Only ñothing at all can be infinite and here is the rub, an infinity of ñothing by its nature can give rise to a finity of possibilities.
conceptually i like the idea that the cold empty universe is somehow equivalent to a hot dense one and find it not just intellectually elegant but also comforting; regards determinism and probabilism i'm not sure what the conflict is supposed to be; consider a radioactive nucleus, say 238-U, statistically we know what fraction of them will decay over a period of time, (roughly half will decay in 4.5 billion year period, which is the approximate age of the Earth) but if we keep inspecting one single 238-U atom we have no idea when it will decay; so at sub-atomic level everything is probabilistic; but when we look at the motion of atoms and molecules they appear well described by collision/ interaction with other molecules whose position and momenta are well above the Planck limit; finally when we reach the large scale macroscopic objects their behavior appears fully determined - we can absolutely know that andromeda and the milky way will 'collide' in around another 4.5 billion years - i bet the 238-U atoms can hardly wait!
The Universe Multiverse: is Omnipresent, Omnipotent, Omniscient, and just is. It has always been and always will be, but we will not. We always try and look and search for answers to our basic of questions… but we CANNOT perceive the unfathomable.
Seems true;because the Holy Qur'aan also mentions that there was Allah (God) and enormous amount of water upon which His Throne was laid. Also, the authentic Hadis(saying of Prophet Muhammad,peace be upon him) also mentions that everything is made out of water.So ,it could be that water was split and hydrogen and other elements were created afterwards , by Allah alone.
Interesting. Does the Qur'aan State all the Heavens and the Earth were created in 7 days and 7 nights. I ask because in studying Nature, most Animal Species on Earth love their brothers and sisters unconditionally. There are rare unnatural exceptions to this, such as Lions killing the children of other Lions. The same with Polar Bears?
If you can't show empirical evidence for something, any claim other than, there's not enough evidence to call judgment, or I don't know, is being dishonest. It's why I'm an agnostic atheist.
"hey nothing, what'cha doin'?" "oh, nothing much. just figured i would turn myself into a universe today. can i borrow a spark?" "well, i would let you borrow a spark, but a spark is something, and science says that the universe was created from nothing, remember?"
If it didn't come from nothing ..then where did the something come from and where did that come from .... then where did that come from. NOTHING. NOTHING IS SOMETHING... AND SOMETHING IS NOTHING. ... IM A GENIUS
No! Nothing is not a thing. There is no mistake. Your confusion is the results of indoctrination. Indoctrinated, assimilated education. Read more nonfiction. Dictionary. Encyclopedia. Study linguistics. Stop embarrassing yourself. In these comments. With your personal riddles. We can hear your mental illness. Embarrassing!
มันคือการชนกันอย่างต่อเนื่อง ของธาตุอิสระ จนเกิด เป็น ลักษณะเฉพาะของดาวที่ไม่เสถียรภาพ ชน ระเบิด รวมตัว ชน ระเบิด รวมตัวเรื่อยมา... จนเป็น DNA ดาวนั้นที่เสถียรขึ้น ...จนกว่าจะมีการกระตุ้นจากดาวห่าง หรือการเสื่อมสภาพของธาตุ...จนสมดุย ใน หรือ ระหว่างแกแลซี่ต่าง ไป จุดตั้งต้น ทั้งหมดคือ ก้อนของธาตุอิสระ..!!!! We just a developing of chemical compound!!born later and try to keep everything into a big cycle.. Universe in unlimited.
We live in a universe controlled by Time, Space and Matter. A God controlled by these cannot be a God, God has to work independently of these controls. Genesis 1:1 In the beginning (time) God created the heavens(space) and the earth(matter).
@@slipvskorn God created these constructs and abides by them. The earth as it is is 13,000 years old only. Its hard to say when the universe was created. That verse is not specific as to what in the beginning means. Ive thought about it before.
There is no such thing as "Nothing". As fun as it is to speculate we will never know the answers to our big questions, at least not in our temporal existence.
Yup evwn nothing is something. It all becomes semantics and filosofy at that point. Doesnt mean space is complex, it just means our words are not sufficient to describe reality, so we need better language
Well, you are almost there - just the part with "multiple" universes bothers me. There is one infinite universe with millions of big bangs and billions of solar systems in different phases of development. Congrats. I always said the BIG BANG is wrong. And there is the good news: If all is infinite, then it includes us - our spirits - we are indeed eternal in every aspect. We follow the eternal principles of this ONE universe: Being born, developing and living, being destroyed and reborn - some time, somehow, somewhere. We need no GOD and no threatening stories of hell. We are part of the universe.
I hear you but what we consider a "universe" is the resulting fallout from a "big bang" so you're just describing the infinite multiversal plain of dark matter or "the dark matter sea" as I've dubbed it. I agree with you otherwise, but a universe has a specific definition. And we are definitely our universe if not our brane experiencing itself through the projection of chemistry.
Also what we call a "spirit" is likely our 4th dimensional waveform. 🤔🤔 And when you think about it we're just a jumble of chemistry, specifically that of our brain, so surely out of the pure statistics of in infinite anomaly we reside in our specific brain reconstitutes somewhen/somewhere...
I always wondered that if God created the universe from nothing, then where did God come from? If the universe is finite, then what’s on the other side?
![Beyond the Observable Universe [4K]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/mty0srmLhTk/mqdefault.jpg)
No matter what your answer is, whether Creator or Big Bang, at some point, it had to have came from nothing. Who created the Creator? If he was eternal and always just here, then why can't the "stuff" that made the big bang also be eternal and always just here, ready to make those interactions? And if it's a simulation, same answer, then the real universe still has to struggle with those answers.
Come on, everybody knows, it's the Christian God who did it. All the other endless Gods were/are fake. Only Jesus and his Dad and his uncle Allah... are real! It's gotta be those three Holy Trinities. They said so, too, in their HOLY BOOKS, the Bible and the Koran. And they also ask a very logical question, to those who don't believe them: If it's not WE --- Jesus, God, and All ---- then who? After all, SOMEBODY gotta do it.
Everyone knows, for example --- a trivial example but a sound one nonetheless --- if you throw trash around, someone has got to clean it; trash don't disappear into thin air on their own. Someone has to pick up that trash & put it in the trash can! Everything works like that.
Even 4 year-old's know that!
Only very stupid Liberals, who are into Satan and his brothers, Lucifer and the Devil, would deny the fact that Jesus, his Dad/God, and his Uncle Allah --- who have ALWAYS EXISTED --- created everything, from virtual particles to galaxies and super clusters and sheets of billions of galaxies....
And, yes, HEAVEN, too, where Jesus, his holy Mother, the Jewish Virgin girl, all the angles and archangels and the thousands of European saints the Pope/Catholic Church has beatified over the last 2,000 years....
P.S., as I've said, all the other Gods by all the other stupid, primitive tribes from the beginning of time until today... they're all fakes. Jesus said, in the Bible, he came down to the Middle East, at the height of the Universe, sent by his Dad, God, which is Jesus himself in another form, in Heaven.... and that he's the ONLY REAL DEAL!
science is the route of matter being left for infinity which evenutallly leads to a random explosion called the big bang (this cycle will repeat forever). religion is the route that god forced that matter together and shaped it himself (this in theory only happens once).
Then that "stuff" can't be accident. It has to be intelligence to stay eternal. Because accident, or random events can't happens without cause.
@@stormryder4305 the cause is infinity. wait long enough and matter will take every form possible including the forms of bombs. eventually an explosion big enough to overcome gravity will take place and boom big bang. infinity is basically a cheat code.
Everything starts from understanding
I believe that we, as humans, simply cannot comprehend that something has existed forever.
we really can't understand quantum reality that we can actually study and measure, e.g. wave/particle natures, quantum entanglement etc. Yes we can predict and mathematically model it but there is no "real world" mapping or analogy to imagine what we are observing there. So the universe is orders of magnitude less intelligible.
Yes we can, that's what many people say about their God, and some say it about our universe, the reason we believe in the big bang is bc we've observed that everything is moving away from eachother and tracking back those trajectories through time results in a single point
Personally I believe in infinite directions of time not just one or two and they go on infinitely
What about hot & cold?...
We cannot but we try to apply our logic to any and everything. Just like some need the thought that god did it to appease their discomfort
Why is this a surprise, isn't it physics that say energy doesn't die, it remanifests? If energy can't die, it can't be born, it just exists.
correct
We are the energy itself. We just exist. Never born, just transform from one matter into the other.
What created energy, then?
@@watarimono17 None. Op just stated the principle of energy conservation, based on mathematics equation. And it is the first law of thermodynamics: Energy can neither be created nor destroyed. Like OP said, it just exists.
inifnite acceleration gives the brain the ability to grasp/fahom infinite space
-infinite acceleration of space as opening sequence of an infinite universe where planets are fed with stellar wind and stars and galaxies are fed with cosmic radiation
(cosmic radiation origin by entropy -as an infinete universe filled with cosmic radiation is of lower energy than an infinite vakuum)
The concept of before and after the Universe is beyond what our minds can conceive. We can only function within boundaries, be them physical, ethereal or other.
❤❤❤
I don't know. I think my drawing of what I think is beyond the universe's expansion boundary is quite comprehensive. And I have plenty of hypothesis about before and after our universe. I don't think it's incomprehensible for our brains, but it does stretch our brains ability and most likely can't fathom it very well.
Like I think before our universe there was a singularity in a sea of dark matter billions maybe even trillions of lightyears away from another sigularity or even another "universe". Time has always been a forward momentum even before the big bang. This singularity that would eventually become our universe would blink in and out of existence, like a quantum fluctuation, until it finally stabilized in spacetime and expanded into our universe.
Well, I don't think it is what our minds can't conceive a before and an after, neither we can only live with boundaries. Our species have thrived and still are thriving thinking beyond boundaries, imagine the unimaginable and make it happen... And that started with creating fire...
Our mind (ego) is simply fouling itself by thinking everything has a beginning and an end. But simply put energy can't be created neither can be lost. Every single atom in yours or mine body is made out of stardust... What ever make us 'US' or our soul or consciousness, or whatever living creature we presume without, cannot be anything else than energy...
Think about that... We're not just spectators to an unimaginable large maybe indefinite universe, we're a conscious living part of it. Hence I don't care in whatever god one believes in or philosophy one follows, because - one way or the other - they ALL tell the same story, that NEVER was disproven: Energy doesn't get lost... It's just transforms into something else...
It's the commonly accepted understanding and concept of energy but whoever proves that wrong - aka energy does get lost at some point (even for a tiny bit) instead of being transformed into something else, not only wins a Nobel prize, but also proves every religion or philosophy to be wrong... Plus any interstellar traveling ;)
But that puts our universe within boundaries. Or our universe as part of a multiverse. The problem is trying to imagine why or how anything exists at all. @@InfiniteSkiegh
@ricf9592 Not really. The "sea of dark matter" is infinite and serves as a medium for the stabilization of singularities (formed in black holes [why it "blinks"... at least until the black hole is destroyed or evaporates. It's outside time until it's not being "fed". The infinite density of a singularity warps space time so drastically it's like it breaks it's tie to it. ] The absence of the black hole is what then allows the singularity to expand into a "universe". Watch Kurzgesagt's video"what happens if we destroyed a black hole?" For more info on black holes and their singularities. ) to appear and serves as a multiversal plane for the creation of "universes". It is within a brane (the higher dimensional plane that contains the multiversal plain of our universe (sea of dark matter) and particles probably are exchanged between them in a looping infinite system. They probably aren't even these domino shapes we imagine, but 4th or 5th dimensional objects which we have trouble perceiving. (Look up 4th dimensional object moving through 3rd dimensional space.)
I don't think we need to have an explanation of an infinity complex that just is. It has no beginning or end, past and present are illusions. We are just traveling it moment by moment because this 3 dimensional form only allows us to experience it that way.
Obviously we have no proof for any of this, but this is where my logic has brought me from the existential crisis I've been having since I was 10. 😅 I've put so much thought into this subject since I was a child and realized I was a projection of chemistry and 99.9999% empty space...you too...and the phone I'm typing on and you reading and the earth we're standing on...all 99.9999999999% empty space
I've got a headache.
😂
That sucks 😢 hope it's gone by now lol
Got just a knot Onkel my brain
😂😂
science is about 'what we know so far', so to say something is impossible is saying that we have bypassed the future discoveries and reached absolute knowledge.
Yes 👏🏽
Can you freeze fire?
Can you turn time back,, you" no other or someother,, na forget it,,,
@@paullynch7672 No, you cannot turn back. Everything is forward moving.
@@louseveryann2181 Apply scientific analysis and get your answer. I have a sinus headache and thus cannot answer from a scientific perspective right now but it can be deduced.
If E = MCxc , then matter = Energy/ CXC. So matter has to be generated by action of light, in particulate state interacting with energy can generate mass.
Nope
Physics can only answer the questions of how, but never answer the question of why.
True, but that's not a problem to be solved in physics or any branch of science. All why questions still require how questions. Otherwise, they are only hypotheses still in search of greater understanding. You won't have all the modern discoveries and technology science offers. You will give up a lot.
Physics can’t tell us how either, unless naturalism is the answer and even then some parts of nature seem to be out of reach.
That’s not true at all😂😂😂😂
it can't explain how something came from nothing
@@kkap895 Maybe so, but maybe not. There's no proof either way. But space and time cannot exist without something in it to measure. If something was always there, that implies there was always time and something inside some volume of space. That also makes no sense. To have no beginning to everything we see. Nothing could be as logical an explanation as anything else, hard though it is to grasp the concept.
A riddle shrouded in an enigma wrapped in a puzzle
Beyond any human understanding of existence
None of the questions asked can ever be snswered
Yes, because "snswered" is meaningless!!
@@Anarchy-Is-Liberty With your Anarchyisfreedom, you must be a loon
The answer is of itself - having a little light and dark - spinning slowly - while absorbing itself - within.
It nothing but - an amazing anarchy of meaning.
Maybe releasing - more salient questions - but without answers, of course.
This has been - discussed before.
There - chew gently - on that. (Pineapple and coconut flavour) Hee hee
(Just having a bit of ) Like your answer, though) Fare thee well @@Anarchy-Is-Liberty
If I wanted to listen to a complete ration of bullschitt... I would go find a Biden Speech !
For the next universe I vote for no commercials
The big bang never happened... and as for your Question the beginning is never the end... the end is never the beginning... limitless the cosmos are... humanity is kentic and mathematics cannot fathom... humanity is adolescent.
Our understanding of physics is bound by the limits of our observations. As we push the limits of what we can observe, we might discover that the universe is fantastical, whimsical, and unpredictable beyond anything our understanding of science has so far constrained us to.
With trillions and billions everything exists . People don’t get that
Bro, Universe is created by God ( creator ) . Now,some people question who created God . My answer is Creator ( God ) is self created i know it sound strange that how something is created without any creator . But Universe, Galaxies, solar systems, planets and Life forms and all other piece of creations is created by almighty God /King .On the other hand , Understanding The source of Creation is like Group of Ants solving maths Construction Practicle Geometry Chapter . If the Single piece of Creation is so Complex then just imagine the Creator ( God ) Who made Billion , trillions piece of those complex pieces of creation complexity . Single human is jigsaw puzzle of 7 octillion pieces 😅😂😂😂😂.
I think if we can begin to understand what nothing is..... We might be on the trail to something
Saying something came from nothing is another way of saying "I don't know what came/happened before that"
Y is there something rather than nothing? Because nothing doesn’t exist....try to imagine ‘nothing’, it’s impossible.
Impossible is possible.
@@sonny5069 then imagine how nothingness looks like.🙂
The closest to nothing we can get is a vacuum state and even then there's still quantum particles blinking in and out of existence. 😅
@@InfiniteSkiegh and even a vacuum is something, otherwise you wouldn’t call it a vacuum. See it as the number 0. It’s not nothing. It implies it is 1 or -1 or something in between. But it still is a zero.
Correction; It implies it isn’t 1 or -1
The notion of infinity , and the older one- of eternity, features. Old beliefs morph into the obvious. The metals and chemicals in our earthly space can be wrought in a number of remarkable ways. {How else could I be talking to you right now!} There seems to be a purpose and a rationale for existence.
Ever wondered where all that material goes that black holes gobble up, the billions of planets stars and asteroids that get absorbed over billions of years, well it has to somewhere! perhaps it finally explodes creating a new universe in a different dimension.
Black holes aren't empty spaces. They are dense beyond imagination.
That material is what makes up the black hole. Black holes are just very dense balls of matter, to which the sucked up matter is added. It's only a 'hole' in the sense that, since no light can escape, they seem like a dark area in the sky, only visible through the high energy activity that goes on near it's event horizon.
Something wouldn't be anything without nothing. Your so-called geniuses are all wrong. Everything you think you know is wrong also. For these reasons you will never figure it out nor will your precious AI. Good luck with all that.
I was an experimental quantum physicist back in the 70’s and studied atomic and molecular collisions. I would calculate the diffraction patterns produced by these collisions without Schrödinger wave equations using simple geometry and Stoke’s law with other fundamental physical laws with a calculator. Never was the wave function even part of the calculation. Remember I actually experimented with real particles interacting with each other. I wasn’t some theoretician locked up in a cubicle with a pencil and paper. I argued with every physicist that would dare challenge me since the best they could say was, well you just don’t understand the mathematical equations used in quantum physics. Needless to say I left physics and became a pilot and had loads of fun and made a lot of money for only working a fraction, a little fraction, of the time.
Now I listen to these ridiculous theories that are unprovable and remember Ptolemy and the geocentric of solar system model which used elaborate gears and geometric contraptions to predict the positions of the planets. It didn’t do a bad job. Then came Copernicus, Kepler and Einstein. See where I am going.
All these theories are about the same level of that geocentric model and that elaborate contraption. We have not got a clue and until we know what dark energy and dark mass is and some “Copernicus” like physicists comes around all we do is come up with these theories. Virtual universe? Seriously. Stop watching the Matrix and get into a lab and leave that pad of paper and pencil at home.
ua-cam.com/video/Or7pwR60ilE/v-deo.htmlsi=ZJ6DKDB1CaIm-T3_
Unprovable is very different than unfalsifiable and you should know the difference
k boomer. none of what you said is even true and you have a 2 inch d
maths are human made . useless in the big scale of the universe but makes sense for dumb humans
An "experimental quantum physicist" who doesn't know the science jargon meaning of "theory." I didn't think that possible. But, here you are.
Big Bang doesn't SAY the Universe came from nothing. This is classic Creationist strawman argument.
Big Bang says that all the energy that makes up the Universe was compressed into a tiny singularity which expanded, and is still expanding. There is nothing in Big Bang about where that energy came from.
"Before the beginning" is a meaningless phrase. Time & space came into being WITH the big Bang. There is no such thing as "before time" Whether the Big Bang was a one-off or a repeated Big Bounce, there is no "before the Big Bang"
What has a first man or woman got to do with Big Bang? There were certainly no humans at the time of the Big Bang. There weren't even atoms at that stage, let alone life.
I don't know anybody who thinks the universes came from nothing, and nor has that ever been taught to me ??
grow up.
@@ethomson201 - I am grown up and I stand by what I said
The Big Bang doesn’t say something came from nothing. It states that the universe was in an incredibly hot and dense state and 13.7 billion years ago it began to expand. It makes no claims about what came before the expansion. Maybe before you post a video you should learn about your subject matter.
I am fairly certain at this point, that the universe, and everything in it, including all of the people, are just imagined by me, and I am totally alone. What makes me so sure is that I can close my eyes, fall asleep, and all of this is gone, and I can create any universe I want during this time. Explain that away, if you can.
I can assure you this is not the case.
@@rexreynolds9203I know. My point is, that we create alternate realities in the mind, and some people don't know the difference between imagined and real.
Yes, it's either mental illness, or an overactive imagination. Get help.
Protagonist syndrome
Listening to this video is a waste of your time. The only benefit to listening to it is that it will demonstrate in a very small way how much no one knows about the universe, multiiverse or basic existence aside from what some have seen and tried to explain, but have failed time after time. Our language of communication among humans is insufficient to describe the complexity of what, how, when, where and why anything and everything exixts or does not exist. By using simplistic names for things not understood (i.e., black holes, dark energy, dark matter, etc.) the people who are intellectually superior to most of us in a number of ways continue to try to describe the indescribable that they do not and cannot know. Most of us have at some time come into direct contact with the earth when losing our grip or balance. So we know that there is some kind of attraction between us and the ground we normally stand on. What we don't know is what that attraction is composed of even though we may be able to use a mathematical equation to approximate it in quantifiable terms. So it shouldn't surprise anyone that there are many other processes on a much grander scale that we cannot calculate or posit how and why they exist. While there will continue to be heroic attempts to explain "existence" of everything, our gray matter will continue to be inadequate to explain the what, where, when, why and how of everything, anything and nothing that we desire to KNOW. We are inadequately equipped to understand, communicate and demonstrate those basic concepts, partly because our brains are inadequate and all the theories that have and will exist from our birth to our death will NEVER explain them.
We will continueto to remain ignorant because the "answer(s)" are "simply not" and are "not simply" available to us.
It seems more logical that "big bangs" are common and that there was not A (unique) big bang. In fact, big bangs could be a lot more common than super nova occurring in "our" universe. Imagine a giant bottle of cola (space) and each bubble (universe) that forms is from another "big bang". Any intelligence that forms inside that bubble(universe) deduces that they are the only universe as they can never detect any other bubble.
It's something that I already told. Nice to meet you brother of ideas.
Yup!!! I'm right there with you guys! I've been lumped in with Flat Earthers until now! Hahaha!
"A little bit of knowledge is a dangerous thing"
The creator (of this video) just shows here that he doesn't understand scientific terms like he thinks he does.
He gets a LOT wrong in just the first minute.
Laughable.
Life process in our stomach is likely similar in life process inside infinite Space,in tree,in creature,inside soil,under water etc
Dear Physics, please stop trying to find a theory of everything, the micro is a different world with different rules from the macro. But if trying to mix oil with water is your thing, then by all means continue. But because scientist cannot grasp the fact that Zero does not exist then you'll never figure it out, here is a clue, zero is nothing more then a boundary and until is considered as such all your physics will remain incorrect, that's why you cant figure it out.
Our minds cannot comprehend the fact the the universe is endless and alot more to it than what we know.
I disagree. Depends on the person.
Or that it's finite and there is no way to explain or comprehend no space outside of what is...
@eyeq7730 yes I can't imagine a limited universe. What is outside it I would ask. Also impossible to understand infinity. Both are equally impossible to understand
i can comprehend the fact that we know nothing of what everything is and we will probably never know. maybe we get answers when we die?
@@MrElias1998 lol, probably more questions honestly...
I never believed in the big bang theory and believe the Universe is much older then what the big bang could have created. If you take a drop of water from the Pacific Ocean, that might begin to compare to how much we know about the Universe in comparison.
I once had a discussion with a biology expert.
I asked how did all this start ?
His reply, In the beginning there was nothing. And then some dust formed.
My next question.
Where did this dust come from ?
He had a perplexed look on his face and then took off. Never talked about it again.
It's absolute madness to say the universe came from nothing! Why not admit some massively brilliant being started it all. Who made her or him is another question.
The dust was and is and will be always, what's make the difference is the Will which starts anything. It's like a light, you swicht on and you see, without your will to switch, the Nothing remain. The Light makes the difference bewteen Nothing and Thing. Well... many hebrew linguistics gems is genesis 1.1 and following, not revealed in the bible with their vulgare foreign translations.
Why not admit there's a god, is what you're saying. Because there's no proof. You can't just admit something without evidence. Her or Him? Thats a human label. You cannot label god male or female. Stop posting comments. It's for the best of everybody.
Your comment makes no sense. You criticize the dust coming from nothing, but you jump right to God existing and put off answering how God was created.
The same logic can be used for the dust. Where did the dust come from? That's another question so let's just believe it for now. Do you see how ridiculous that is?
Believe that which has evidence and dismiss the rest. "God" is easily dismissed as mere conjecture.
Should have asked a cosmologist (and the Biology guy seems really dumb) or you invented him like humans invent gods.
My reply, I only know what I know, and I know bullshit when I hear it.
What is amazing is that aside from Lawrence Krause explanation of nothing, no one in astrophysics or physics claims the universe came from nothing so your argument is stopped at the starting line.
The cosmos was created by an eternal God...and He created an infinite universe.
All things have neither beginning nor end. What exists today is the result of the movement and change of all things. This process goes on continuously and forever...
Great theories which no one alive today are perhaps in the infinite future will ever be able to prove are disapprove so it is very easy to make them up. So that is why they are theories and always will be.
"Where is it written in adamantine that semi-carnivorous monkeys can or should be capable of understanding reality? That seems to be one of the first delusions, and one of the more prideful illusions of human culture, that a final understanding is possible in the first place." Terence McKenna
Lol no. This is also complete garbage. Pretending like it will never be understood because humans are monkeys (which is also bullcrap) is tarded. Terrence McKenna is a bullshitting edgelord.
another delusion is that these same monkeys cause or prevent climate change!
I don't know anybody who thinks the universes came from nothing, and nor has that ever been taught to me ??
I will say No, because the question of "how the universe was created" is a bit like the Turing test for AI: every time the problem is solved it gets redefined.
Suppose that science someday nails down all the phenomenological details of the Big Bang to everyone's satisfaction; the question then becomes, "Are/were there other universes?" (This is already an active topic!)
If that question is answered, "Yes, there is a Multiverse in which our universe is just one instance!" then the question becomes, "How did the Multiverse come into being?"
Then suppose we someday find the answer to that question. There's certain to be an even more ambitious question one can ask about How/Why/Who?
It's Turtles all the way down
Indeed, turtles all the way down. Turtles within turtles within turtles. Now that's my kind of reality.
could another universe collapsing cause the big bang? i mean the energy had to have come from somewhere. i don’t know how something that big could collapse on itself or what could cause it. i remember seeing something about it but i wonder how other people who know more think about it.
I don't know anybody who thinks the universes came from nothing, and nor has that ever been taught to me ??
If we embrace the idea of the Big Bang, we find ourselves contemplating the nature of time itself. Might time be an unending river, flowing both backward and forward without constraints? Does the universe's timeline extend infinitely, inviting us to traverse its currents in exploration of the past and the future?
I believe time flows in infinite directions
@@danielhone9910
I believe our senses have evolved to help us determine our surroundings, not that they are arbitrary, this includes our sense of time. For me, time is a mechanism of the observable universe and beyond, but it is much more complex and dynamic than we can currently perceive.
I believe there are parallel universes with differing arrows of time, and these universes interact with ours gravitationally; dark matter is the gravitational effect of matter in temporally adjacent universes and dark energy is the effect of matter in relatively temporally inverse universes. I believe that blackholes are portals that pair with whiteholes in these parallel universes, and the Big Bang was one such white hole. The "beginning" of our universe will have been the "end" of at least one of the temporally inverse universes.
@@danielhone9910 Well, with my proposed cosmological model, there is no beginning. It's a branching cycle; our "universe" came from a white hole and will eventually be eaten by blackholes, and some of those black holes lead to big bangs in branching timelines and some to big bangs in a looping timeline that "ends" with the blackhole that caused our big bang. I reckon a lot of the branches operate similarly and loop back on themselves, while some may loop back to our big bang, and some may extend infinitely without "destruction." As for before the big bang initiated and after the final blackhole collapses in our observable space-time, I reckon there were other branching cycles, unless space-time itself is thoroughly propelled and swallowed by these connecting singularities.
@@danielhone9910
Yet I am spiritual, and I believe such a universe was a choice we made as spirit. I think function comes before form. We were a floating consciousness or "source" or "God" or whatever, and we chose to entertain ourself by splitting into infinite lives throughout infinite times and spaces, interconnected through the thought-form of all that is, what we are. We made this playground in an instant, a creation that was never created, a blip of an experience in a world without end.
@@danielhone9910
Thank you :)
The part about us being a floating consciousness that chose creation is just intuitive to me and cannot be proven so it doesn't belong anywhere near scientific research, the cosmological model part is also intuitive to me and it baffles me that noone seems to be researching it, maybe they'll catch up, maybe I'm crazy lol
Nothing is the absence of something, so either way, we get a universe. Erroneous math does not equal erroneous theories.
The universe never had a beginning , it always has been there
So then it would never end? There can’t be one without the other. Over trillions of years black holes will swallow everything. Over another trillion years through radiation decay particles will be gone and it will be a completely cold empty universe.
Exactly how I feel about it
relative potential difference is everything. -1 ~ 0 ~ +1
I am pleased to have gotten so many comments to my statements about how and why. When I was going to college and studying physics I kept wondering about the same questions. I got my masters degree in physics and then a doctor of law and still could not find an answer. Einstein once said " God doesn't play dice with the universe" questioning Heisenberg's uncertainty principle. He spent much of his life trying to find a unified field theory but never succeeded and it is his 2 math theories on which all of modern physics is based. In the 1930s there was another good physicist, I can't remember his name at the moment and am to lazy at the moment to look it up, who was also a friend of Einstein and he wanted to know what was the foundation on which math and physics rested. That has actually nothing to do with the question of whether God, whatever that means, but actually is a scientific inquiry about whether there is something on which all of the laws of physics rest. You can either blindly just say what these laws are or you can ask his question about whether there is a foundation which actually also exists under these laws. Quantum mechanics actually is also based on mathematics as is all of modern science, but even math is based on basic assumptions without any explanation of why its rules work. I admit that even at my present age of 80 I still have no answer in my own mind. I am still in love with physics and have followed it most of my life. I was an ashiest in my teens and 20s, but as I got older became less certain about whether or not there is any meaning to life and wound up an agnostic admitting to myself that I just do not know whether there is or is not a creative force behind everything, but I keep studying and trying to find an answer that I can accept. I suggest that you all need to keep an open mind to the question of why because it is actually a major issue in physics today being considered by many physicists.
Mathematics, which I love, is simplified language by way of numbers and values. E=mc2 is a lot more than those if in an actual math problem and definitely more if made into a sentence. Mathematics which are symbols, based off hypothetical values we can’t truly measure, involving things we have never and will never see, experience or measure probably/ possibly.
The universe is binary. At it's core, everything is made of positives and negatives. Even the tiniest particle we can detect, is made up of something smaller. Small enough, I imagine, to be undetectable by any means. Imagine a quark has millions of parts to it, every one is made up of clusters of positives and negatives. The clue to everything is found within a magnetic field. Imagine the sensation of a solid object being created by nothing but energy. I'm telling you now, that matter is not real. It is a sensation, for lack of a better word.
@@ThisThing435a scientific theory must be able to make successful predictions. Something having a hypothetical value. Does in no way diminish it's value. An hypothesis is not just a wild guess.
@@timhallas4275currently in physics the Planck length is the smallest we can go. I'm sending you a link that explains why that is believed to be the case.
It also opens up another can of worms. The simulation theory. In base reality. There shouldn't be a limit to something being made up of something. But physics tells us that the Planck length is the limit. Which would make sense in a simulated reality.
@@rationald6799Simulated reality is an oxymoron.
You better try to tell us how it got its start.... I'm pretty sure it's way beyond our understanding
The main problem with explaining the "beginning of physical reality" is the fact that the explanation requires using words and sentences. Words have specific meanings and sentences are necessarily incomplete requiring multiple sentences. Therefore, trying to explain this using words can imply that there is definite separation between ideas. Words like "The" vs. "A" implies that "the" is absolute and objective while "a" is relative and subjective. These subtle words create a lot of friction and disagreements that may not be real.
A metaphysical explanation of "The Big Bang" would be that "before the Big Bang", what exists (always exists) is just "energy". By "energy", I mean that which defines existence itself. I am not referring to the term used in physics. "Energy" could also be called "consciousness", which is also misinterpreted depending on the context it is used. "Consciousness" in this case is simply the awareness of existence and the ability to act. This ability to act is what is called "potential energy". "Kinetic energy" is what happens after an action, or the result of an action. So just based on "energy", you have 2 states that can be understood: "before" and "after", "cause" and "effect". This observed state of "energy" creates the perception that there is time. So questions such as "what was before" or "what is the cause" comes from observation. However, how are you observing these states? Shouldn't the ability to be aware be the true question asked, rather than what caused something? The other issue is of the term "observation". "To observe" is not an optical action. It is the ability to be aware in a specific way. When one physically observes something, they become aware of a specific state. But this is also done without visual representations. One can become aware of any type of information. This ability to be aware of something is what exists as "energy".
Going back to the idea of "Big Bang", what is observed, or the "energy" that always exists, can be seen as parts within the whole no matter how small you go. Those parts are acting independently within the "singularity" energy of the whole. This differentiation of the whole into parts creates the concept of action. If the whole acted, it would not change because it remains the whole. But if the parts acted, then each part is acting independently of the other parts and the awareness of the whole changes. Thus, you have difference. This difference within the whole can be observed by what each individual part does and becomes. Again, this "observing" must occur somehow. If there is only "energy", then this "energy" must be the observer, and it is observing itself. Since there is only "energy", there is only "itself", and what "it" observes, is the parts of "itself". What each part does "creates" something new because the creation is change or "transforming" (in reality, it is becoming aware of something it was not aware of before). These parts can be considered the "particles" of physical reality. Those particles that came together to form larger particles is simply each part interacting and cooperating with other parts. These new parts are the result of cooperation between parts. From a metaphysical perspective, this is likened to growing in awareness or "consciousness". This growing of consciousness happens because something new is experienced. Having been a single part, now becoming a larger part is an experience of the individual parts. It was not, but now it is, before and after, cause and effect.
All questions about matter and the observed form is merely a way to represent the parts. The more parts that cooperate to form a larger part changes the awareness of itself relative to the other parts. Transformation does not mean energy is ever lost or degraded except as the physically observed form of energy (heat, electromagnetic signatures, etc). You cannot see the true "energy" since it is what's doing the observing.
The physically observed representation of energy implies linear time by the way change is represented. The visual representations create the perception of a continuous sequence, but what if the sequence isn't one change to another change, and instead is one state to another state, both states already existing in potential? The act of observing that state would "actualize" it into reality. So what changed isn't the whole or the parts as if they are physical things. Instead, the awareness changed and depending on what point of view you're talking about, it will appear as before and after. You can call this point of view as dimensions or levels of awareness. There are many new-age concepts that discuss this (this is not saying "new-age" information is infallable), but the general point is that the closer you get to the perspective from the whole "energy", the less you are aware of change since "everything" must include everything that can exist, and thus there cannot be anything that has not existed except through a lack of awareness. This is how "everything" can experience being "everything", by being the parts that represents every thing. But from the perspective of each thing, it cannot know every thing, thus the lack of awareness allows the "whole" to experience itself by experiencing itself from the point of view of each part.
The "creator" concept, or "God", is no different to the singularity concept of the "Big Bang", except as people attribute a personality to the concept. "God" in religious terms has become "energy" personified because of the religious teachings, not because it is that way. The single undifferentiated "creator" is the whole energy that is existence itself, but there is no human point of view for "God" except from the parts within. Creation is not limited to just one perspective or experience. Therefore, infinite potential cannot be represented by any single personification because that would be creating "God" in the image of man. The idea that man is in the image of "God" is that humans have awareness and potential, just as every thing else in existence. The part of the whole that is also aware, can create as well, not in visual terms, but from its actions that can change the awareness of itself. Removing the personification, which is because of the lack of awareness, means there is no such thing as "creation". Rather, everything is an experience of becoming aware.
People will belive in everything except for a creator. So ignorant
I'm going with Theory 4 . Every time I see one of those life after death stories they mostly say "They took me and shown me other worlds or parts of this world." Then they put them back on earth to live longer with these crazy thoughts. That's what a kid in his/her basement would do to punk people on their planet.
I go with theory 3, infinite multiverses. I have had intimations of this possibility, even of subtle changes within the reality such as we know it. The situation we are dealing with may also be being affected by the machinations at the Large Hadron Collider, down to and including newly defined and discovered quarks.
@@Geoplanetjane your comment about the large hadron collider indicates your lack of understanding of what they do there. They are recreating interactions that already occur constantly in our universe, just in a way where we can observe them. Believing that the "machination" of CERN's work causing structural changes in our universe is like believing that a black hole may form because you put electricity in a light bulb.
@@Geoplanetjaneyou have had nothing, lay of the drugs
Don't need a why.😊
OUTSTANDING documentary!!!!
Which ever theory you consider, non of them explain why anything exists at all. By this I mean that theories all assume that some thing has always existed from which space and time operate but the real question is whether they have always existed for infinity. In the end it will all eventually come down to the question of not why any form of reality exists and instead it comes down to the issue of whether there is a beginning or there never was a beginning and that may be unanswerable no matter how much progress we make in physics.
ua-cam.com/video/Or7pwR60ilE/v-deo.htmlsi=ZJ6DKDB1CaIm-T3_
Space has no requirements. Including a beginning or a limit to its size.
It's beyond bizarre to think of a beginning and an end... The Big Bang probably was the beginning for us... But then scientist say both the Universe is expanding (even beyond light speed) and will - ultimately - collapse in itself again...
And that - for me - sounds plausible, one big black hole that contains the entire universe, unable to contain itself and turns into one big white hole and that process repeating itself over and over again, infinitely... But because of whatever happens in a black hole, doesn't exclude a multiverse; instead this process would imo make it far more likely for those to exists...
In the vastness of infinity nothing or something is essentially the same thing. There's no reason to assume nothing should be the default state because you're applying our logical understanding of time and space when the properties of the vast state beyond our perspective could be completely inconceivable and something could have just always existed.
Light is God...that's your answer...Light is DNA. God said let there be light...there is no riddle...you can't see God.
I have never heard somebody struggle so hard with the word, epoch.
Very well done video. I have been interested in this things since shildhood, but still at62 its more and more fashinating for me. I have no degrees in psysics as a psycologist, and agnostic person. So i am still waiting for a video like this including the thougths of some kind of spiritual dimension, not yet discovered but maybe could explain more of these very complicated things. If there are some kind of dimensions with "spirits" that is not demanding a God, just a continue of Darwins evolution, that we dont need psycial bodies anymore, that could maybe?? be one more key to comming nearer the truth, but the whole truth is as i believe not possible for a very long time, or never??? Already at age 12 i start to think that something must exist, even emptyness is something like you say in the video with things sporadicly comes and then just disappapears! I live in sweden therefore my rather bad english. If i should guess, whice theory is right! I have no clue att al, but Einsteins famous " everything is realitive" is the king of al sayings. We are trapped in our dimension, but like radiowavawes "something" not found yet is surrounding us. Without our ability to notice it. Please do simular videoes and ad the spiritual things to the physics. Thanks for a very well done video 🥰
Too many questions with no answers! Why bother?
I remember the first time I was taught the Big Bang in elementary school and I remember thinking that it made absolutely zero sense.
Wot~? A non-existing Nothing in the middle of nowhere suddenly explodes for no reason and creates the universe, and you can't understand that? Sheesh ... and they call ME dum ...
Funny how science advances when you are a science denier. #FJT #FJB
Great video, I love the way you ask the big, big questions but without asserting that science can provide the ultimate answers and leave room for doubt, even about the Big Bang itself. I don't believe science alone can provide the ultimate answers, the answers are probably bigger than the questions and to coin a phrase "passeth all understanding".
Where honest people say "I dont know" others choose the dishonest route of "God did it"
Because we say God did it. Doesn't make us liars or wrong. Because we truly do not know but I'd rather believe in something then nothing at all. And a God loving us is so bad? Like they say in the good book. Why is that such a bad thought or thing to believe?
@@JoshuaWilliams-dj2co So.."The Flying Spaghetti Monster did it" also fulfills your criteria.
I would prefer to know the truth than believe in your nothing (god).
A "loving god" would not have drowned humanity, would not torture people for eternity. Your god advocates for slavery.
And the bible is a horrendous read, it is hardly the "good book".
nothing new --except minor glitches we knew all this 50 or more years ago as explained in high school
Uau! Really good video!! 🙏🙏
The vacuum bubble idea is getting closer to the possible outcome of something out from nothing but to hold this negative pressure the universe needs a strong and robust "sphere" arround it self (not excluing other forms of containers) and it is hard to occur naturaly... but still, Nature overtakes its own limits!!
No evidence.
@@rogerphelps9939
Can you be more specific? What exactly has no evidence?
The vacuum bubble idea.@@pr_esponjadelik
Nothing from nothing leaves nothing.
Nothing makes sense unless you calculate a creator into the calculations.
And who created the creator? The devil... 👹
@@thekingofmojacar5333Him.
A creator does not make any sense until you first explain the creator.
Questions do not transcend time. Time existed before human thought. Just because you claim not to know the answer does not mean no one knows the answer. There is no existence without time. We experienced time through our star the sun. Read more non-fiction. Take a break from the pseudoscience and study linguistics. Work on your syntax. Upgrade your dialect. Respect semantics. Your vocabulary is outdated. 0:45
You're a hypocrite when you don't even know yourself, time is only a man made perspective
THE BIG BANG is/was a local occurance in our part of the universe.
Exactly, the super-massive black hole that is our universe decided to explode in this region thereby “creating” its own space/time bubble in which we exist today
Don't follow the Science, follow the $$$.
Something cannot come out of nothing, except of course if there are various layers of reality, in which case it emerges from a another layer, one we cannot perceive. Regardless there are other theories that do address the holes in these theories, but science has blinded itself to their possibilities.
What theories are those?
Unfortunately something did come from sperm to egg to human.
"Something cannot come out of nothing" How sure are you of this? It is not something that can be experimentally verified. You see, we have no "nothing" so we can not test it to see what it can or can not do.
Nothing is a form of something, its just called nothing , but absokute nothing doesnt excist, because to excist, it has to be something, checkmate
@@SWOTHDRA You must have an IQ over 300.
Nothing doesn't exist and will never be
This has got to be the most word salad video I have ever watched on UA-cam.
Theory 5, God is the sum of all energy, conscious, and unified. He then alters His geometry creating the void, and encapsulates the vacuum He created, leaving a small fraction of His
energy in the void to condense into matter, which is both energy, and quasi energy, a quantum conscious dualistic reality in which humans are engaged in a proof test, and God has
allowed Himself to be extorted by the one who executed His will to extort. God has to allow experiential knowledge, and skin in the game to allow us free will to prove our allegiance,
and, for God to prove His Love, by sacrificing Himself to fulfill the Divine Legal Contract of payment for the extortion where humans are pawns to the enemy. Is this so hard to believe?
Amen
The Big Bang doesn't say the universe came from nothing. It says everything that exists was densely compacted into a tiny space know as a singularity. Your thumbnail is misleading.
It's bullshit~
hydrogen is the simplest element of only 1 atom.
Another aimless video discussion about a pointless question.
We will never know the answer. So just live with that and accept it.
Endless regression leads nowhere.
Agreed,. They just come up with more mind-boggling nonsense that confuses the issue even further~
Multi verse is funny, we still don't know what a universe is.
Nebuli? Lol ai textspeech???
What pseudo scientist are calling dark matter and dark energy is time. 4:43
There is only one answer GOD ?
But what is god
God is a pretend answer.
If you're ignorant, and want an easy answer and you think a bogus fictional man made contrivance called a bible is the solution to your delusion
Thank you
God bless you 🙏
No kidding! Nothing is still something!
Exactly
could this Universe be a new Universe pushed out from older 1?
Pushed out of a full Black Hole
The big bang theory never stated the universe came from nothing just at time dident know about anti mater or even quarks and higs bosons so couldn't say what could of started it but to day we can guess it was an interaction between matter and anti matter of some sorts that corsed basically a galactic static discharge wich set the hole thing in motion as anti matter turned into mater
in other words, no one has a clue!!!
What people don't grasp is When they say "big bang" that does not mean a fiery explosion, it means a very rapid expansion in space-time from a very tiny point, infinitely smaller than a pinhead. Many scientists have answered this subject many years ago and you can find a plethora of explanations from people who specialise in the subject of what basic elements are in that tiny pinhead.
If it's objective it ain't infinite.
Only ñothing at all can be infinite and here is the rub, an infinity of ñothing by its nature can give rise to a finity of possibilities.
conceptually i like the idea that the cold empty universe is somehow equivalent to a hot dense one and find it not just intellectually elegant but also comforting; regards determinism and probabilism i'm not sure what the conflict is supposed to be; consider a radioactive nucleus, say 238-U, statistically we know what fraction of them will decay over a period of time, (roughly half will decay in 4.5 billion year period, which is the approximate age of the Earth) but if we keep inspecting one single 238-U atom we have no idea when it will decay; so at sub-atomic level everything is probabilistic; but when we look at the motion of atoms and molecules they appear well described by collision/ interaction with other molecules whose position and momenta are well above the Planck limit; finally when we reach the large scale macroscopic objects their behavior appears fully determined - we can absolutely know that andromeda and the milky way will 'collide' in around another 4.5 billion years - i bet the 238-U atoms can hardly wait!
Maybe there is no "why".
The Universe Multiverse: is Omnipresent, Omnipotent, Omniscient, and just is.
It has always been and always will be, but we will not.
We always try and look and search for answers to our basic of questions… but we CANNOT perceive the unfathomable.
Spot on
Seems true;because the Holy Qur'aan also mentions that there was Allah (God) and enormous amount of water upon which His Throne was laid. Also, the authentic Hadis(saying of Prophet Muhammad,peace be upon him) also mentions that everything is made out of water.So ,it could be that water was split and hydrogen and other elements were created afterwards , by Allah alone.
Interesting. Does the Qur'aan State all the Heavens and the Earth were created in 7 days and 7 nights. I ask because in studying Nature, most Animal Species on Earth love their brothers and sisters unconditionally. There are rare unnatural exceptions to this, such as Lions killing the children of other Lions. The same with Polar Bears?
If you can't show empirical evidence for something, any claim other than, there's not enough evidence to call judgment, or I don't know, is being dishonest. It's why I'm an agnostic atheist.
It cannot come from SOMETHING either.......but it can from NOTHINGNESS... Creator CREATES always; nothing is the same as it was a millisecond ago....
宇宙是由空間與能量兩者共同構成的，能量則是從宇宙零度到大霹靂的10^23°C，在此相對大的能量差異造成了在不同溫度下形成了不同的物象！
本宇宙是在大霹靂的高溫下百億度形成了物質世界，所以宇宙零度是在地球溫度下10^22°C，在宇宙零度的原始宇宙中只要10^-27焦耳的能量就可以凝結成一顆光粒子質量的能質粒子，因為是自然產生的所以能質粒子的能階不會完全一樣，在過飽和狀態下能質粒子會尋找最大能階差者結合成無動能無距離的密度無限大的能質粒子個體，這個個體就是黑洞的最小組成單位，結合後的能質粒子個體的能階依舊是獨一無二的，彼此再尋找能階差異大的能質粒子個體作結合，這就是重力的原理，能階差依熱力學高能階向低能階流動以求能量的平衡，這個過程就有了相對運動，當踫撞結合時動能轉化為熱能提升了合體後的能階，隨著黑洞質量的增加其體內的能階也同樣往上增長，當黑洞體能的能階已達極限，再一次的踫撞的能量無法再容納就發生爆炸，所以黑洞的質量是有其上限，而爆炸所產生的能量也差異不大！
在大霹靂發生前的宇宙最大質量的黑洞其周圍有最密集的黑洞系統繞其運行，而能質粒子也遍佈整個原始宇宙，當大霹靂發生時失去了引力源的黑洞系統就以切線方向離心速度飛離中心點，大霹靂的高溫與能質粒子以質能轉換產生了電磁輻射（宇宙背景輻射）、光粒子、原始粒子與暗物質（能質粒子提升能階約-20億度），赤熱的原始粒子以球狀向外擴張，最外圍的原始粒子與能質粒子接觸動能急劇下降，使原始粒子間的極性發揮效應結合成較大的原始粒子個體，這個個體就是夸克的組成單位，經長時期的冷熱交替（+-20億度）原始粒子濃湯中充滿夸克、質子與中子，黑洞系統的離心速度遠小於原始粒子濃湯的擴張速度，被追過時也以自身質量截取適量的原始粒子濃湯於身上並同時也繼續往外飛行，這時裹著赤熱原始粒子濃湯的黑洞系統就轉成了星雲體，星雲體的飛行軌跡就是紅移現象，所以宇宙擴張是離心力造成的，無需加入暗能量項次！
萬有理論中的重力也是由能階差異而形成的，只是與其他的電磁力、強作用力與弱作用力的能階差異達22個數量級別，致令人產生了不能融合的錯誤印象！
黑洞系統中的所有成員均攜帶著原始粒子濃湯，所以衡星系統中的成員都是同時出現的，其運行系統在原始宇宙中就已穩定運行，太陽的中心是有縮小的黑洞將原始粒子濃湯給吸引住，在最靠近中心處形成了高密度與高能量的硬殼，因為要向核心輸送能量，這就導致硬殼的不穩定，在推擠中有部分被噴出，這碎片隨壓力的減少體積逐漸地膨漲，到了表面就爆發形成了日冕，爆炸中含有夸克、質子、中子與原始粒子，因太陽表面溫度太高，導致原始粒子的動能過大，無法形成氫原子，但在較遠處原始粒子處於較低溫度下就有可能與質子以極性結合成繞其運行的模式，這就是星際間也有稀疏的氫原子存在的原因！
行星中心的黑洞質量小所以攜帶的原始粒子濃湯也少，能量釋放的速度較太陽為快，當表面降至600°C時，上空數百公里處濃稠的原始粒子濃湯的動能已減少了，當表面下的熱能攪動導致噴發時，質子在數百公里處與原始粒子以極性結合形成了氫原子，其他在表面下的質子與中子以高速互相衝撞結合成較大的個體，隨噴發到高空與原始粒子作結合形成了較重原子，行星的地殼構成就是如此形成，無需核融合的過程自然界就可以形成物質！
這個邏輯同樣可以解釋類星體的存在與宇宙邊緣的大尺度光絲體結構等！
"hey nothing, what'cha doin'?"
"oh, nothing much. just figured i would turn myself into a universe today. can i borrow a spark?"
"well, i would let you borrow a spark, but a spark is something, and science says that the universe was created from nothing, remember?"
If it didn't come from nothing ..then where did the something come from and where did that come from .... then where did that come from. NOTHING. NOTHING IS SOMETHING... AND SOMETHING IS NOTHING. ... IM A GENIUS
Our mistake continues to be thinking that, because we can’t see it or measure it, it’s nothing.
Is nothing something we mistake for nothing?
No! Nothing is not a thing. There is no mistake. Your confusion is the results of indoctrination. Indoctrinated, assimilated education. Read more nonfiction. Dictionary. Encyclopedia. Study linguistics. Stop embarrassing yourself. In these comments. With your personal riddles. We can hear your mental illness. Embarrassing!
มันคือการชนกันอย่างต่อเนื่อง ของธาตุอิสระ จนเกิด เป็น ลักษณะเฉพาะของดาวที่ไม่เสถียรภาพ ชน ระเบิด รวมตัว ชน ระเบิด รวมตัวเรื่อยมา...
จนเป็น DNA ดาวนั้นที่เสถียรขึ้น ...จนกว่าจะมีการกระตุ้นจากดาวห่าง หรือการเสื่อมสภาพของธาตุ...จนสมดุย ใน หรือ ระหว่างแกแลซี่ต่าง ไป
จุดตั้งต้น ทั้งหมดคือ ก้อนของธาตุอิสระ..!!!!
We just a developing of chemical compound!!born later and try to keep everything into a big cycle..
Universe in unlimited.
The matrix 101.
Its always been a ridiculous theory. The universe was created by God who has always existed case closed.
We live in a universe controlled by Time, Space and Matter. A God controlled by these cannot be a God, God has to work independently of these controls.
Genesis 1:1 In the beginning (time) God created the heavens(space) and the earth(matter).
@@slipvskorn God created these constructs and abides by them. The earth as it is is 13,000 years old only. Its hard to say when the universe was created. That verse is not specific as to what in the beginning means. Ive thought about it before.
There is no such thing as "Nothing". As fun as it is to speculate we will never know the answers to our big questions, at least not in our temporal existence.
Yup evwn nothing is something. It all becomes semantics and filosofy at that point. Doesnt mean space is complex, it just means our words are not sufficient to describe reality, so we need better language
Well, you are almost there - just the part with "multiple" universes bothers me. There is one infinite universe with millions of big bangs and billions of solar systems in different phases of development. Congrats. I always said the BIG BANG is wrong. And there is the good news: If all is infinite, then it includes us - our spirits - we are indeed eternal in every aspect. We follow the eternal principles of this ONE universe: Being born, developing and living, being destroyed and reborn - some time, somehow, somewhere. We need no GOD and no threatening stories of hell. We are part of the universe.
I hear you but what we consider a "universe" is the resulting fallout from a "big bang" so you're just describing the infinite multiversal plain of dark matter or "the dark matter sea" as I've dubbed it. I agree with you otherwise, but a universe has a specific definition. And we are definitely our universe if not our brane experiencing itself through the projection of chemistry.
Billions? I’d say trillions! Trillions times ten to the 7th power. Our own Milky Way galaxy has 500 billion stars!
Also what we call a "spirit" is likely our 4th dimensional waveform. 🤔🤔
And when you think about it we're just a jumble of chemistry, specifically that of our brain, so surely out of the pure statistics of in infinite anomaly we reside in our specific brain reconstitutes somewhen/somewhere...
*This Universe is created from Nothing by the Creator.*
*Khun Faya Khun...Be And It is...*
*Dont waste time...Come to Islam.*
I always wondered that if God created the universe from nothing, then where did God come from? If the universe is finite, then what’s on the other side?
@TheCreaturesHM All metaphysics is, in October 2023, untestable and unfalsifiable.