Watching this on Disney+, seeing the gritty vibe being overly joyfully colored, i remember a much and much darker colorgrading. Maybe it was just that old tv of us 😅
@@Oliver-sb1tf The laserdisc is actually 1.85:1, which is the original and intended ratio. The original negative was 1.66:1, which is more of an open matte.
I don't know what the best is. In some scenes the Dvd looks better, in others maybe the Bluray is better. What is the best in your opinion? Finally I apologize for my bad English, but I am Italian and I can not speak this language very well
The DVD is made from a print and has more accurate colors. The BD looks entirely re-colored. Movies from the 90s have vibrant realistic colors. This tendency to dull and tint is a recent trend
That's a great point. I think that the Blu Ray version is mostly likely sourced from the original files, since alot of the film was inked and painted on the computer. It's also worth noting that at 3:34, the end credit layout has slightly been adjusted and the Walt Disney Records section is retyped. Sorry to be a nerd, but I find opinions on Blu Rays and DVDs interesting.....
@@katethemikufan9109 don't apologize for being a nerd man. (or woman) Only nerds would watch this. (no offense to who made this) There's a reason i'm reading your comment.
The Blu-ray has the better aspect ratio but that about it, watch Disney sell you another Blu-ray of this film in few years time with more accurate colors and another ratio more close to the actual filmed frame.
Watching this on Disney+, seeing the gritty vibe being overly joyfully colored, i remember a much and much darker colorgrading. Maybe it was just that old tv of us 😅
DVD color is much better and natural.
I prefer the DVD version because of the film grain and it looks just like 1996.
The DVD looks more close to the original print, and the Blu-Ray is not only a mediocre transfer, it’s also cropped
@@Oliver-sb1tf The laserdisc is actually 1.85:1, which is the original and intended ratio. The original negative was 1.66:1, which is more of an open matte.
Thank you for posting this on UA-cam. It's really good to see the differences between the Dvd and blu ray for, you know, reviewing sake.
I don't know what the best is. In some scenes the Dvd looks better, in others maybe the Bluray is better. What is the best in your opinion? Finally I apologize for my bad English, but I am Italian and I can not speak this language very well
The DVD is made from a print and has more accurate colors. The BD looks entirely re-colored. Movies from the 90s have vibrant realistic colors. This tendency to dull and tint is a recent trend
That's a great point. I think that the Blu Ray version is mostly likely sourced from the original files, since alot of the film was inked and painted on the computer. It's also worth noting that at 3:34, the end credit layout has slightly been adjusted and the Walt Disney Records section is retyped. Sorry to be a nerd, but I find opinions on Blu Rays and DVDs interesting.....
Honestly my main beef with this Blu Ray is that it has to share a disc with its piece of shit sequel.
Dvd is better and has the original colors.
@@katethemikufan9109 don't apologize for being a nerd man. (or woman) Only nerds would watch this. (no offense to who made this) There's a reason i'm reading your comment.
The Blu-ray has the better aspect ratio but that about it, watch Disney sell you another Blu-ray of this film in few years time with more accurate colors and another ratio more close to the actual filmed frame.
4k UHD Bluray will do it.
Do more, please?