Watch how hot gases expand inside a gun silencer

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 18 тра 2024
  • Look at a physics simulation of the expansion of hot gases inside different designs of gun silencers! Here you will understand which designs are more effective at keeping those gases the longest inside, which of course translates in a better suppression of sound.
    #guns #military #army #armylover #science #technology
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 125

  • @WretchedHobbit
    @WretchedHobbit 4 роки тому +57

    I'm so happy to see recent comments on here. The Powder Community lives!

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  4 роки тому +4

      Right on brother!

    • @anjalifarkase7591
      @anjalifarkase7591 3 роки тому +1

      @@KrissyNotty I thought you didn't know English.
      I also play Powder toy version 95.

    • @aurele2989
      @aurele2989 3 роки тому +1

      Long live!

    • @WretchedHobbit
      @WretchedHobbit 3 роки тому

      @@aurele2989 Agreed

    • @tenix6698
      @tenix6698 3 роки тому +1

      @@WretchedHobbit hi there! :3

  • @Hellkid13
    @Hellkid13 4 роки тому +14

    Love this I would also love to see it with an expansion chamber in the beginning

  • @ghsteele531
    @ghsteele531 7 років тому +12

    Most silencer designs leave the chamber volume ahead of the first baffle the same as that between the remaining baffles, as shown here; since pressure is highest at muzzle exit, it would seem logical to make that first chamber largest, in order to cool the gas rapidly and reduce the pressure proceeding through the remaining baffles/chambers.

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  7 років тому

      +George Steele that seems very reasonable 😐

    • @andrejochimsen6038
      @andrejochimsen6038 5 років тому +3

      A chamber can just take as much gas as it can...so it wil spread eventually through all chambers without affecting the bullets path...larger chambers hold bullet back when its filled before bullet exit.. rather make the last chamber bigger to prevent the gasses to exit in a straigth line..My opinion...

    • @cunnieseverywhere
      @cunnieseverywhere 2 роки тому +2

      @@andrejochimsen6038 stop with the...periods...please...

    • @bctpcp9546
      @bctpcp9546 Рік тому

      You are correct here. I just did a video on this recently. The physics will show that the larger the blast chamber the greater the decrease in initial pressure from the muzzle and thus the lower the velocity of the gas. A lot of good rifle silencers for hunting do in fact have larger blast chambers either via a bigger diameter or a longer silencer, before the actual baffles. For hunting purposes this is ok that it can be big. Of course this is only one of many designs.

    • @bctpcp9546
      @bctpcp9546 Рік тому

      @@andrejochimsen6038 One thing which has to always be taken into account unless the designer is simply designing something without a lot of modelling etc; is to avoid any unnecessary turbulence affecting the bullets trajectory, so the projectile must always be ahead of any gases.

  • @mengvaj87
    @mengvaj87 4 роки тому +3

    Love it... I have mine set up like number 3 & 4. This way it holds more gas and pressure and it stays near the barrel and the center/middle longer then near the exit. when it's on the other way around, it's going to keeps the gas pressure sounds less and it's a bit louder. again When you have it the other way around it's more louder than what I was saying. That why when you watch videos from UA-cam and you can still hear how loud it is when shooting from round to round. That's why they have dry and wet from that style. But the number 3 & 4 on your clip, I set up like that as stated above you don't have to run it wet because being dry the way it is, it's already quieter and no need for wet but you can still have it wet but it's not going to make much differences.

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  4 роки тому

      That's some cool insight, thanks for sharing! 😊

  • @KrissyNotty
    @KrissyNotty  7 років тому +13

    Thank you for watching this video! And hello to all Power Toy enthusiasts still going well into the 2020s!✌

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  7 років тому

      +SoulFul Diva gracias! ☺☺☺

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  4 роки тому

      Thanks! And I will check out your UA-cam channel 😊⭐

    • @user-pb4lz1gv6h
      @user-pb4lz1gv6h 3 роки тому

      @@KrissyNotty ยลยยลลลบบบบยยบบบบบบยบลบลลลลยลยฐบบบบบบบบบบบบนฐฐบบบบบบลลบบบฝฝ
      ฝฝ
      ขชขลบลบฃชชชลจบนนลลงลจฃจฅ๖ใ
      ลตงงจบคยฃฃยจฃลตจบฃฃฃฃ0

    • @galonsalsa2310
      @galonsalsa2310 3 роки тому

      bruh

  • @Comet-lv3nk
    @Comet-lv3nk 4 роки тому +5

    More like a flash hider but still awesome!

  • @B61Mod12
    @B61Mod12 7 років тому +4

    nice. is there some kind of value that you can come up with for the rate and temperature at which the exhaust gasses exit the muzzle of the suppressor for each design? It would be good to see a quantitative figure of which is most effective.

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  7 років тому

      +JonDavid Hi! That's a brilliant idea... let's see: perhaps if you changed the composition of the initial reaction. The materials, I mean. That would change the temperature of the gases, and yes, you could tell the temperature by hovering the cursor over different areas. Also: using the "Heat Display Mode" would allow you to visualize the temperature of the entire simulation (a lot less accurate, but useful if you want to see the big picture --literally) :)

  • @SMRE1
    @SMRE1 5 років тому +5

    Very best animation i found. Thanks

  • @blacksabbath5300
    @blacksabbath5300 2 роки тому +1

    I don’t know as much about tactical attachments as the guns themselves and I’m not criticizing because again I don’t know, but wouldn’t this be a flash guard?

  • @stevemccull9699
    @stevemccull9699 2 роки тому +1

    I really like this visual modeling. Well done!

  • @wwv
    @wwv 4 роки тому +4

    what did you use for the explosive and the walls to hold it in, also the ignitor? used gun powder and fire but not getting the same power.

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  4 роки тому +3

      Man, it was so long ago, I really don't remember... But I think the yellow part might be gas. But I can't recall exactly what it was. Sorry 😢

    • @wwv
      @wwv 4 роки тому +2

      @@KrissyNotty no worry cool video!

    • @ElectricGun100
      @ElectricGun100 4 роки тому +3

      Gas and tnt, fire for igniter

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  4 роки тому +3

      Nice, yeah, I think that's right!

    • @Cokardo
      @Cokardo 3 роки тому

      @@ElectricGun100 i thought it was termite

  • @marianoridella
    @marianoridella 7 років тому +2

    Te hago una consulta: Para un silenciador calibre .22, cual es el diametro minimo interno que debe tener el silenciador para no interferir con la municion? Y en el caso del .308?
    Gracias

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  7 років тому

      +ALBERTO EMILIO Ridella me gustaría ayudarte pero no dispongo de esa información 😐😯

  • @marinoproton3066
    @marinoproton3066 4 роки тому +6

    Try the same with Tesla's valve.

  • @ExohrEcho
    @ExohrEcho 3 роки тому +3

    Damn, always wanted to make a silencer in TPT. Thanks!

  • @DANTHETUBEMAN
    @DANTHETUBEMAN 2 роки тому +1

    Angle the virtual walls on the last design, make it harder for the gas to reflect out. Great video.

  • @tacomas9602
    @tacomas9602 6 років тому +2

    HEY! what material is used to block the explosion, which breaks soon after?

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  6 років тому +1

      +Vincent Sluga sorry, I can't recall exactly what I used, but I believe it was a thin layer of TNT. Good luck! ☺

    • @Comet-lv3nk
      @Comet-lv3nk 4 роки тому

      @@KrissyNotty yes it was as it made embers

  • @jimjakosh2506
    @jimjakosh2506 3 роки тому

    So what design reduced the db the best??

  • @mychevysparkevdidntcatchfi1489
    @mychevysparkevdidntcatchfi1489 3 роки тому

    What happens if you put shape of a car in front? It seems you can analyze car's aerodynamics without going through OpenFOAM.

  • @nyuztr
    @nyuztr 5 років тому +1

    Qual superior o modelo é o melhor???

  • @jaydup6342
    @jaydup6342 6 років тому +2

    could you run a simulation with a tesla valve. Very curious as to what would happen.

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  6 років тому +3

      +Jay Dup thank you for the suggestion. I just looked up what a Tesla Valve is and I believe I can do recreate that. Stay tuned to my channel for that video ☺

    • @jaydup6342
      @jaydup6342 6 років тому +1

      Awsome...

  • @artashesharutyunyan3693
    @artashesharutyunyan3693 3 роки тому +2

    This is really cool. What soft did you use?

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  3 роки тому

      Hi! It's called Powder Toy and it's free 😊

  • @someonerandom9939
    @someonerandom9939 6 років тому +2

    The main problem is getting most of those gasses into the chambers and cooling before it gets sucked out

  • @ivannagamine3055
    @ivannagamine3055 4 роки тому +1

    Hola que programa usaste para el simulador por favor

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  4 роки тому

      Hola! Se llama Powder Toy (puedes googlearlo y descargarlo gratis 😊)

  • @ismailbol
    @ismailbol 3 роки тому +2

    Hey man what did you use as explosion?

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  3 роки тому +1

      I can't recall... Gas, I think, with a spark in the rear of the chamber (but I honestly can't tell you for sure) :(

    • @ismailbol
      @ismailbol 3 роки тому

      @@KrissyNotty thanks

  • @irwankamil5767
    @irwankamil5767 4 роки тому

    Where of disig is the best. Pleas coment

  • @mememan4705
    @mememan4705 3 роки тому +2

    Now i wonder how many people have ever played tpt before getting this in recommended

  • @mny-patentcatalog681
    @mny-patentcatalog681 6 років тому

    Interesting ,entertaining

  • @MarceloPereira-ll4go
    @MarceloPereira-ll4go 3 роки тому +2

    👏👏👏top

  • @VladVortal
    @VladVortal 6 місяців тому +1

    Super.Thx from Ukraine

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  6 місяців тому

      Thank you for commenting ☺️

  • @michaelcollier2352
    @michaelcollier2352 3 роки тому +1

    Nice

  • @MotivatedMetalworks
    @MotivatedMetalworks 5 років тому +1

    Your model doesn't account for the bullet obstruction as the gasses are released or as the bullet passes the baffles.

    • @aurele2989
      @aurele2989 3 роки тому

      True, although TPT isn't the best program to test this stuff with moving objects. Because, you see, no physics objects, like bullets.

  • @JKOC59
    @JKOC59 3 роки тому

    wich of this system is more eficient to .380 pistol?

    • @aurele2989
      @aurele2989 3 роки тому

      System 3 was most effective, so I'd guess that's the case for most firearms.
      Including the .380, of course.

  • @theunipadyunipader2090
    @theunipadyunipader2090 7 років тому +1

    IMMA SHUT MAH LAZER!

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  7 років тому

      +The Unipady Unipader lol 😂

  • @rakszy
    @rakszy 3 роки тому +1

    If you have bad fps on tpt, install the lua script loader and get max FPS, it is soo good, I from 60/70 got 300fps

    • @titaniummech9156
      @titaniummech9156 3 роки тому

      can you explain how i install it and where i can find it

    • @rakszy
      @rakszy 3 роки тому

      @@titaniummech9156 just type
      tpt.getscript(1, "autorun.lua", 1)
      into the console, does not work for mobile, after u type that I think you have to restart the app and a new box at the right should appear with the word lua on it, if it is there that means it worked

  • @ninorata9711
    @ninorata9711 2 роки тому +2

    Watafak apenas vuelvo a tu canal como desde hace 3 años atras y noto que ya no tienes la misma cantidad de videos como las comparaciones militares de paises, videos de bombas nucleares etc. Ni la cantidad de seguidores, que paso
    :,( youtube te metio una restriccion por tu contenido o algo parecido?

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  2 роки тому

      Algo parecido 🥲

    • @ninorata9711
      @ninorata9711 2 роки тому

      @@KrissyNotty Chale 😔

    • @ninorata9711
      @ninorata9711 2 роки тому +1

      @@KrissyNotty Nimodo pues a seguir verdad? He visto lo que han hecho con los shorts y me parece una idea increible y innovador por que nunca habia visto algo similar, espero que les de frutos la idea y que logren volver a poner de pie al canal

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  2 роки тому

      Si, muchas gracias, estoy tratando de revivir el canal y tu comentario es muy valioso para saber que sí vale la pena 😺

  • @yuribarn8919
    @yuribarn8919 3 роки тому

    But what is it better?

  • @PimpinArianto
    @PimpinArianto 4 роки тому

    Good

  • @druttenpv
    @druttenpv 8 років тому +2

    WoW!

  • @md.rokibulislam7707
    @md.rokibulislam7707 3 роки тому

    Which one is better silencer?

    • @aurele2989
      @aurele2989 3 роки тому

      3 has proven best in this scenario.

  • @mostlymessingabout
    @mostlymessingabout 3 роки тому

    Where can I find the software?

    • @ryanzhu6533
      @ryanzhu6533 3 роки тому

      Powdertoy.uk.co i think

    • @aurele2989
      @aurele2989 3 роки тому +1

      I don't know if you've managed to find it after two months, but the site is powdertoy.co.uk/
      You'll find the download somewhere there.

    • @pablocastro_
      @pablocastro_ 3 роки тому

      It's called the powder toy, just Google it, it's free to download

  • @RobertSmith-hr6cr
    @RobertSmith-hr6cr 11 місяців тому +1

    Adding a large blast chamber before the start of the baffle stack would greatly improve the performance of the suppressor. A large blast chamber allows for the rapid cooling of the gases which allows maximum performance of the baffle stack. The suppressors main purpose is to slow a bullet causing it to go from super sonic to sub sonic. You'll find Integrally suppressed firearms with the barrel inside the suppressor with ports just past the chamber to be more effective. Being Integrally suppressed allows more of the high pressure gas to cool and dissipate before ever reaching the baffle stack making the firearm much much more quieter. Cool video it's actually really kinda interesting to see the process in action.

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  11 місяців тому +1

      Well that's a very detailed explanation! I would love to make an experiment to try that. Unfortunately I don't have the resources right now, but I have an idea on how to make it happen irl. I would just need to buy or lend the right equipment 😬

    • @RobertSmith-hr6cr
      @RobertSmith-hr6cr 11 місяців тому +1

      @@KrissyNotty
      I'm Retired Marine Corps Force Recon my mos was 0326 (Recon Man Parachute and Combatant Driver Qualified) i Retired as a Gysgt. I'm also a 100% Disabled OIF/OEF Veteran I served 2 deployments in Iraq and 3 in Afghanistan. The MP5SD was my first introduction to the wonderful world of suppressed firearms. When i first disassembled it I was surprised by how simple the suppressor design was. After that i decided to learn everything possible about suppressors how they worked how they were made. The ability to make a firearm that's by design loud quiet by adding a tube with multiple chambers made by adding angled washers or individual baffles fascinating. I actually have recently submitted the paperwork for a Class 2 SOT as well as submitted my ATF Form 7 i am starting my own Company to manufacture and sell Suppressors. I already have a building and all necessary equipment needed to begin Manufacturing suppressors soon approval of my Class 2 SOT and FFL Form 7. Let me know if you are interested in staying in touch.

    • @gbone7581
      @gbone7581 11 місяців тому +2

      A suppressor doesn't slow a bullet down!

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  3 місяці тому

      Wow, I'm honestly impressed about your qualifications and your project! I hope you have your manufacturing company up and running by now 😊 And sure, if you'd like to make a collaboration or showcase your suppressors on this channel, let me know (you can contact me by going to my channel info > view email on a desktop device) 😊

  • @victorvanraaij8532
    @victorvanraaij8532 5 років тому +2

    0:40 pure satisfaction

  • @user-bf9vq8by9o
    @user-bf9vq8by9o 6 років тому

    Ok. Who's more efective?

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  6 років тому +2

      +SS 88 which design is more effective? You'd have to test each one, measuring the sound produced by each. That's the only way to know for sure.

  • @bigblack7797
    @bigblack7797 2 роки тому +1

    Это разве глушители? У нас их называют банками, или ПСБ.

    • @KrissyNotty
      @KrissyNotty  2 роки тому

      In English please, so I can answer 😭

  • @user-re1ro1ct2h
    @user-re1ro1ct2h 3 роки тому

    Ok

  • @vuphi4495
    @vuphi4495 Рік тому

    Mô tả cho luồng âm thanh thì ok. Luồng khí thì vl

  • @VideoTvorec
    @VideoTvorec 3 роки тому

    softWare?

  • @magnesium3273
    @magnesium3273 4 роки тому

    That's not a silencer that's a compressor and no fire exists it so...

  • @MoxxMix
    @MoxxMix 4 роки тому +1

    All are bad designs.