It is interesting to note that, when receiving chemotherapy, patients are advised to not drive for 4 days, minimum, as the drug test is not able to discern between the illegal drugs, and those administered in a medical setting. This, is a problem. @ Danny Weldon: I get nervous around enforcement officers. This is due to the fact that I have 'dirt' on all of them. Police, Transport Inspectors for the heavy vehicle fleet, and, Magistrates' Courts, Australia wide. This is despite the fact that I have protection under 'Parliamentary Privilige' of the Senate. Many years ago, I had a crew of Transport Inspectors stop me on the side of the road, accusing me of being overloaded on the truck that I was operating. A weighnote from a public weighbridge, showing my axle weights was rejected, and was weighed on the portable scales. The Inspectors had 4 tries to book / report me for offences. I managed to talk my way out of each offence, and ended up getting my notebook out, and writing the Inspectors up for 6 offences! I also went to the head office, 2 weeks later, and blasted the Chief Inspector about hiring "Keystone Cops" to represent the Department! Further to insult the department was they had told me twice in that year that I was not suitable to join them as an Inspector! Sadly, society penalizes people who know too much. Has recently cost me a great job.
Had to deal with the rivo cops in schofields, was pretty surprised by that tbh (and a few run of the mill suvs)..... thought blacktown cops would look after schofields area....
We don’t see the face of the driver or the plates on the car. What are the odds of Highway Patrol and a television crew randomly pulling over some guy with a stash of illegal weapons ?
Propaganda to justify treating everyone like criminals. Apparently, three state supreme courts have ruled that RBTs are illegal, which to hazzard a guess would be because they don't have reasonable articulable suspicion of you having committed a crime. Like when they ask, have you been drinking tonight, I don't answer the question. That would be like asking, have you been speeding at all today, sir? You have the right to remain silent; you don't have to self incriminate yourself
You would only further incriminate yourself by behaving like that. It would be pretty god damn obvious that you have something to hide if you acted so suspiciously.
@@allstarwatt7246 I'm not talking about trying to hide something illegal. What I am saying is that the video is propaganda because it is subtly saying, "we found a dangerous criminal at an RBT, therefore it's good that we have RBTs", which treat everyone like they are a potential criminal. The logic behind RBTs would be like doorknocking everyone and asking them to submit to a drug test, just in case. Please understand that the police do not have the power to do that because they need to have reasonable suspicion, otherwise they could go rogue and harass anyone they like. IMHO, RBTs are the same thing. They shouldn't pull people over and test them unless they have reasonable suspicion, which, as an example, might be if they saw you driving erratically. We have been conditioned in Australia just to accept police overreach. Search UA-cam for "dui refusal" to see examples of brave people successfully pushing back in the USA. Although our laws and constitution is different, I believe many of the same principles apply. Personally, I wouldn't yet refuse a breath test in Australia unless I had good legal defence and was prepared to take it to court. That's a battle for someone else to fight. But I would voice that I would only comply under threat of arrest.
@@dannyweldon3100: Take that one step further, the same could be said about the heavy vehicle "inspection" stations. They are opened at random times, and pull all vehicles in over 4.5 tonne G.V.M. There is enough evidence in the public domain to sink all enforcement agencies, and many Courts, back to 1948. In many jurisdictions, where they do not have the secondary test as N.S.W. does, they are using the preliminary test to suspend your driving privilige for 24 hours. The preliminary tests are not 100% accurate, nor are they approved for use, under Commonwealth law. I have no objections to the law being enforced, as long as it is equally enforced across the board, and at this time, it is not happening. I just wonder how the "Serious and Organized Crime Gang" legislation works in reverse...
You got bright lights behind you and three cops and a camera crew in ya face
‘What’s he so nervous about?’
Amazing find !
Serious potential.
Only lessened by Cops without seatbelts driving back to the station...
Fucking idiots.
5.20-5.40 talking about law breaking while both not wearing seatbelts
Even the police have to wear seat belts??
"random" testing ha ha ha
It is so annoying having to watch snippets again and again!
Just play the 'expletive' things straight through!
Totally agree
It is interesting to note that, when receiving chemotherapy, patients are advised to not drive for 4 days, minimum, as the drug test is not able to discern between the illegal drugs, and those administered in a medical setting. This, is a problem.
@ Danny Weldon: I get nervous around enforcement officers. This is due to the fact that I have 'dirt' on all of them. Police, Transport Inspectors for the heavy vehicle fleet, and, Magistrates' Courts, Australia wide. This is despite the fact that I have protection under 'Parliamentary Privilige' of the Senate. Many years ago, I had a crew of Transport Inspectors stop me on the side of the road, accusing me of being overloaded on the truck that I was operating. A weighnote from a public weighbridge, showing my axle weights was rejected, and was weighed on the portable scales. The Inspectors had 4 tries to book / report me for offences. I managed to talk my way out of each offence, and ended up getting my notebook out, and writing the Inspectors up for 6 offences! I also went to the head office, 2 weeks later, and blasted the Chief Inspector about hiring "Keystone Cops" to represent the Department! Further to insult the department was they had told me twice in that year that I was not suitable to join them as an Inspector!
Sadly, society penalizes people who know too much. Has recently cost me a great job.
Had to deal with the rivo cops in schofields, was pretty surprised by that tbh (and a few run of the mill suvs)..... thought blacktown cops would look after schofields area....
Better get a lawyer son and a real good one …
I feel for him though not just the cancer he could have some heavy dudes after him and be using those weapons for protection and so young
This isn't America mate.
@@ethansNZtrainsthe fuck does america have to do with anything?
We don’t see the face of the driver or the plates on the car. What are the odds of Highway Patrol and a television crew randomly pulling over some guy with a stash of illegal weapons ?
There’s been a ton of of episodes of this show so it is possible
How about a policeman wearing a seatbelt the POICE have to wear seat-belt as well
He used a knife because he assaulted someone with it
What about the solid red line for cannabis
You might find the solid line for cannabis would be the control line for the kit.
I’m on my way to the shithouse pub up the road
& the pigs squeak all the way back to the bus.
Police are just angry with this guy because hes got the same weapons they do and they dont like that
Propaganda to justify treating everyone like criminals. Apparently, three state supreme courts have ruled that RBTs are illegal, which to hazzard a guess would be because they don't have reasonable articulable suspicion of you having committed a crime. Like when they ask, have you been drinking tonight, I don't answer the question. That would be like asking, have you been speeding at all today, sir? You have the right to remain silent; you don't have to self incriminate yourself
Best comment yet! 👍
You would only further incriminate yourself by behaving like that. It would be pretty god damn obvious that you have something to hide if you acted so suspiciously.
Any cop would easily be able to see right through your BS.
@@allstarwatt7246 I'm not talking about trying to hide something illegal. What I am saying is that the video is propaganda because it is subtly saying, "we found a dangerous criminal at an RBT, therefore it's good that we have RBTs", which treat everyone like they are a potential criminal. The logic behind RBTs would be like doorknocking everyone and asking them to submit to a drug test, just in case. Please understand that the police do not have the power to do that because they need to have reasonable suspicion, otherwise they could go rogue and harass anyone they like. IMHO, RBTs are the same thing. They shouldn't pull people over and test them unless they have reasonable suspicion, which, as an example, might be if they saw you driving erratically. We have been conditioned in Australia just to accept police overreach. Search UA-cam for "dui refusal" to see examples of brave people successfully pushing back in the USA. Although our laws and constitution is different, I believe many of the same principles apply. Personally, I wouldn't yet refuse a breath test in Australia unless I had good legal defence and was prepared to take it to court. That's a battle for someone else to fight. But I would voice that I would only comply under threat of arrest.
@@dannyweldon3100: Take that one step further, the same could be said about the heavy vehicle "inspection" stations. They are opened at random times, and pull all vehicles in over 4.5 tonne G.V.M. There is enough evidence in the public domain to sink all enforcement agencies, and many Courts, back to 1948. In many jurisdictions, where they do not have the secondary test as N.S.W. does, they are using the preliminary test to suspend your driving privilige for 24 hours. The preliminary tests are not 100% accurate, nor are they approved for use, under Commonwealth law. I have no objections to the law being enforced, as long as it is equally enforced across the board, and at this time, it is not happening.
I just wonder how the "Serious and Organized Crime Gang" legislation works in reverse...
Its a tiny little .22. Wouldnt even mark your vests