Who wins? 1000 Marines vs 20 Siege Tanks
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 лют 2024
- Professional StarCraft 2 Tournament: • MASS ZERGLING Floods! ...
Starcraft 2 is a Science Fiction Real Time Strategy & Tactics game by Blizzard Entertainment. Download and play free at www.starcraft2.com
--
Gaming, Starcraft 2, SC2
#Starcraft2 #SC2 #RTS - Ігри
World War 1 tactics be like:
Or more like the war in Ukraine currently 🤣 Cannon fodder
@@donovanvansenus1968ДА БЛЯДЬ, ДАЖЕ ТУТ УКРАИНА!!!
@@donovanvansenus1968 and each side represents one or another of these on different front directions 😅
@@Garviel_Loken.Surely the marines aren't representing a military so incompetent and disorganized that they used the cell phone towers in said country leading to multiple 3 star generals getting sniped within weeks lmfao
@@donovanvansenus1968 это точно. Ваши хозяева отправили сотни тысяч украинцев в могилы...
I like watching the marines turn into significantly more pieces of marines.
It is Food for the Ground
Something brenda would say
@@osa236harca6 BRENDA BRENDA hello time for bed.. I tell you about the Fable when you could Fly
This is why we need to nerf protoss
Protoss is the weakest race already. Never win tournaments.
@@CMDR_BirbThat's the joke.
@@CMDR_Birb no way bro said that
are you a bot?
Yes more nerfs for protoss. Remember that one time MC won a tournament? Never again.
@@CMDR_Birbpeople like you make us want to leave protoss intact. It's good we have a race for intellectually weak people to win with 😅
this clip embodies two things winter says all the time, "more stuff counters less stuff" and, "but at what cost?"
This is definitely one of the "At what cost?" moments of all time.
@@elgar7252 In this case we can be sure. The cost of 903 marines.
I wonder how many marines Clem or Byun would have lost if they controlled the 1000 marines.
I mean, let's remember this has no micro and that any attempt to micro the tanks would end up in negative micro.
Anyone with at least plat level micro should be able to take out those tanks with probably less than 200 marines with decent pre-splits and a bit of stutter-stepping. The cost would go way down.
@ar218 i agree except for the specific league, I have 100% seen even diamond players a-move into a tank line and then decide now is the perfect time to look at their base and build a few more buildings
“The right thing will beat the wrong thing, unless you have enough of the wrong thing”
Blue lost infinitely more gas in this exchange
You want the pieces left of me boy?
Knowing their weakness, I sent wave after wave of my own men at them until they reached their limit and shut down." - Captain Zap Brannigan, of the good ship Stormwalker
*And that was without a single drop of micro*
Now run it back with the marines running all the way up to the sieges hahaha, cool video!
"By the numbers Boys!"
The marine is such a microable unit though. I known it's not the point of these shorts but if the marines stimed at the first tank fire and didn't start attacking until they touched the tanks. Well the short would have been a hell of a lot shorter
Studder walked n thos tanks would have been toast instantly
To be fair, the tanks could've been setup in a concave
The marines are without any upgrades. On the other hand, the tanks are in an open field.
Now I know that marines beat tanks!
You'd be surprised with proper splits and movement... I think it was Byun that I saw demolish an opposing pro terran with pure marines vs. tanks and a few other things.
i don't know if your commentary is ironical, but the video shows the reverse :
if you want to beat 60 supply of siege tanks with a suicide assault of marines, you need 1000 supply of marines
@@neojack333 *if you want to beat 3/3, siege tanks with 0/0 no stom marines and refuse to micro, you need 1000 supply of marines.
I think it doesn't matter if the tanks won that or not. The cost and supply difference between the two is staggeringly wide that it shows how cost efficient tanks are against clumped up infantry.
Any player with half a brain would have stimmed and run up next to them. I doubt Red would have lost 200 in that scenario.
When it’s 0/0 marines with no stim combat sure.
You can show the same story with fully upgraded hellbats against 0/0 zerglings.
Or 0/0/0 carriers against 3/3 thors.
Upgrades are highly impactful for low damage high attack rate units.
Killing more than 900 marines with 20 tanks is indeed a big win. Even if the tanks 'lost' this one.
@@bobvandeurzen869 u blind? if marines came close to the tanks, they would have been destroyed in 10 seconds, losing at best 200. And with steampacks and grades tanks wouldn’t have fired 4 shots
All I've learned from this is to stim up ramps more voluminously
SCL glazing: "That's a great trade for Maru! His bio army just rolled through those defenses. He started when he was 13 you know?"
"If we have more soldiers than the enemy has bullets, we win"
I think if the tanks weren't in line it would go better for them since the marines would spread less and there would be more splash damage
Or if the ai just made the tanks attack a row or two back into the crowd--- would have turned this around completely... But this way we get a longer confetti party...
@@ObsidianShade If tanks were more intelligent, their damage would be decreased to keep the balance, They have their current damage values to make their current targeting AI work.
All the tanks needed was more vision to change the outcome, do it again but with a scan for blue
Watching these videos has really made me realize how inefficient the siege tank AI is. The tanks always target the CLOSEST enemy, rather than targeting with the goal of causing the most damage. If these tanks were landing their shots on the second marine back, they'd be wrecking significantly more havoc than they already are. Would that be OP? Maybe. But just an interesting thought and something perhaps one of those enhanced AI could factor into their micro.
So 50k minerals 1k supply defeat 3k minerals 60 supply. That's impressive
I always use marines in bunkers and siege tanks at the back in case some zerg unit try to put it out. marines gives protections while siege tanks give firepower for defenses.
Someone teach these marines to stutter step.
Stalingrad.
That was closer than I thought it would be.
Got it. So what you're saying is that when my opponent is turtling on 2 base with a ton of tanks I just need more marines!
the emperor conquering the galaxy:
"Its not about how many marines you have but how many marine u have to replace them with."
this must be Death Korps of Krieg
for the emperor
Its not about how many men you lose, it's about how many you have to replace them!!
Now that's what I call cost efficiency.
Now imagine how much faster this would have been if the ai knew how to stutter step.
We are outnumbered boys , there's nothing we can do
The shadow of them flying 😂
The marines crushed face!
I think the results may have been different if the tanks were in a ball rather than a line.
Korea has a lot of excellent self-propelled guns like the K9 because there are so many marines on the continent.
I was rooting for the tanks 😂
That one seemed obvious from the beginning... Would need more strategic siege tank line to have a chance
closer than you'd think lol
"For the Emperor!" - Kreig army.
Well considering 20 tanks is possible in a match and 1k marines isnt... even though the marines needed about all of those 1k to win 😂
You should make videos like this, put with coop commander units like Tya used to do. I would watch EVERY single one of em
I don't realize how 50k minerals defeated 3k minerals 2k gas
as the russians would say "acceptable losses"
"who wins? 1000 marines..." MARINES
efficient way to go down for the tanks!
Woo, we only lost most of us!
I'd like to think those were clones or bio droids :)
the armor on tank seemed to really help
Now pop a couple science vessels or something to give those tanks their full vision range
903 marines later: victory!
Would the result be different with another formation in the tanks????
If you force move the Marines closer they can all shoot. They would win harder. If the tanks didn't focus on the front line the splash damage would be greater. Hitting the front line only splashes one half the direction of the battle line
Tank all in a line come on where the 3 by 3 square formation
How do you get a larger map
The eternal question
You should demo this with army that almost same cost(with reasonable time play)...the results of that is much useful to player who watched your video...
What mod is this?
Advanced Unit Tester
this really shows just how important stepping forward and ensuring as many units as possible are in range. this fight would have been over significantly faster and at much less of loss of Marines. if you are going to commit to this attack, *do this.*
Интересно,если приделать пулемёт или миниган к танкам,то танки бы робедили!?
50k minerals for 1,000 marines
3k minerals and 2500 has for twenty tanks
Each tank killed an average of 46 Marines before dying. RIP
Same thing but with a concave in favor of the siege tanks
What kind of arcade is?
that was unfair because the top tanks were not fighting for most of the video
40K Imperium Tactics
903 marines for 20 siege tanks? Worth /s
If you macroed the marines it would be an easy W
50,000 minerals for 1,000 marines
3,000 minerals and 2500 gas or 20 tanks.
The deadliest weapon on this planet is a marine with his rifle. ~
thanks
97/1000 Survivours, DAMN!
Put the tanks on a triangle formation
we won
But at what cost
The marines were transported away from the sector, away from this war they were fighting.
Unfortunately for the marines, they found themselves in the far future of the 41st millennium.
I'm going to say that the red lost.
Very close though
I think life would be different if the thanks were more boxy, less line
Оно выглядит так будто марины с 0/0 а у танков как минимум броня +3
сам маршал жуков командовал этими маринами!
You know how scuffed this is because upgrades matter, formations matter
Was intentionally asymetrical
so satisfying
Nothing beats marines huh
That was a 91% loss of marines. Def not worth it. 45,150 minerals and 903 supply.
Seems pretty cost effective to me
Pretty much proves you aren't getting up the ramp with that poorly timed rush when siege tanks are out.
yo pensando que la poblacion de los terran eran gracias a los depositos de suministros y no a los amos supremos
In Soviet Russia, infantry tanks you.
*I expect limited casualties*
if the tanks were in a better formation they would've taken it easily
1000 supply vs 60 supply this is nonsense, at least you need 40 tanks😂
If they tanks were cluster then might of won
Ww1 battle of Gallipoli colorized
This was already tested back in June 6, 1944.
I like how not OP tanks are compared to SC1, no insane range, no cool lines, no cool sound while deploying, no cool sound while attacking. Just a generic unit.
I love SC but it has some terrible lack of options with pathing & combat engagement
This looks like Russian tactics in Ukraine😂
Ban😊
For what, speaking the truth?@@alexpuzerev
20 tanks still killed more than 900 marines. W tanks
FOR THE MOTHERLAND COMRADES!!!
so what youre saying is terran op?🤔
Yes we need Terran buf