Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
ANOTHER THREAT APPROACHES... | STAR CITIZEN
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 тра 2024
- Join Algared and Execute for this weeks QNA as we take any and all your questions about Star Citizen.
You can find out GoFundMe for Citizencon 2024 here: gofund.me/1c32...
You can support us on Patreon, helps us with new Equipment Etc: / inforunners
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @inforunners
Use this referal code and join Star Citizen and earn 5,000 UEC STAR-JM66-LWRV
Inforunners discord for your suggestions or just ask questions! / discord
#StarCitizen #Inforunners #Squadron42 #NoBullShit #PC #videogame
I love how gently Algared just gently teacher speeches his way back into the conversation every time Execute interrupts him. Bless Algared for his limitless patience.
Algared is a genuine nice guy, very passionate for the game and the Christopher Lee of Star Citizen (CL read the LOTR once a year, Peter Jackson often sought CL advice on the Lore aspects of LOTR). Execute...would you go to CC with that needy child/
Algared is amazing, can't wait to meet him at Citizencon. Execute needs to learn some manners, can't blame it on X, Y, Z fella.
jeezzz execute stop interrupting Algared!!! Let the man speak. 😅 Else great show. Thank you guys.
Glad it wasn't just me thinking this
Just to add a note on Capital ships, CIG has recently been working to add a new classification of sub-capital ships for large ships, with capital components, which have smaller crew requirements. True capital ships are far fewer, the Polaris being the smallest of them. On Galactipedia, there are only 8 true capital ships now, Bengal, Endeavor, Idris-M, Javelin, Kraken, Pegasus, Polaris, and Vanduul Kingship. All others are sub-capital regardless of components.
Hull E, Pioneer?m, 890jump?
1:52:16 DAOC is truly a Masterpiece work of art of a MMO game.
YOU CANNOT Compare Star Citizen with a Game like Fort Night the reason for this is one is a Complete game in the hands of its community with the option to buy loot Crates and things, the other is a Test Bed that has still yet to release Pyro that was supposed to release 7 years ago out of the mouth of CIG themselves.
My largest Problem is with CIG is that they SILENCE PEOPLE in Forums sorry but if you have that much faith in your Project and you know your not going to Fail then why would it matter if someone says something Negative about a part of the Project but yet they do they continue to BAN people for asking Questions, their is no other GAMING Company out here who does this beside CIG!!!!
Again if you have so much faith in your Project then you wouldn't worry what people say on forums you wouldn't only delete post or ban people for community infractions but nope they are so SCARED they will fail they ban people 30days for asking about Pyro and why its took 7 years
''Sandie is my HERO'', equally a lot of people don't know that: ''Star Trek'' almost didn't make the network? After a failed pilot, Lucille Ball not only advocated for a second pilot but circumvented the board of her production company, putting up her own money to ensure that the show had another chance.
Great video as always guys it is always fun to tune in. Love the conversations and theory crafting you both bring. 45:55 I was just joshing with Algared love you both!
They have done a great job at one thing. They have created such low expectations in all of us backers that have been here for years that we all wheep and cheer and fall all over our selves just for a map update. Lol
I have followed development since the pitch, followed every detail i could, leading up to the kickstarter. The pitch was ALWAYS a singular game. Chris would specific refer to "the game", in singular form. Never ever once did he refer to "games". We agreed to the kickstarter, based on the pitch, and information that followed, regarding "A game". Every video, article etc of the pitch and following information from CR are all immortalized by the internet and all show Chris Roberts talking about a singular game he wanted to make. In 2010-2012 era had traditional, old school type games with a single player campaign that was basically a tutorial that prepared you for online mode. THAT is what SC eventually was supposed to be, based on the era, which was still one game, only later turned into 2 separate projects as gaming evolved.
I backed for a singular game. So did everyone else who was around since the pitch. Everyone who backed after the project was changed into 2 separate games backed 2 games.
I can tell you when it went to a LOCKDOWN was the day that Sandy left and the day Chris Roberts released that Letter from the Chairman when he talked about how the Developers were down hearted because the community were talking negative about a Issue that had took place and that's day lips got Locked and the Community got Screwed and the Forums become a Place of you can't discuss anything negative.
An your 100% right it was always about Squadron but the Promise of the PU was to be 100% made but we also have to look at people in my opinion 98% of use backed for the PU and not the Single Player but now we also had thousands of people back the game for just the single player because of all the old games that he produced, I also think it's Amazing thou that people seemed to have forgotten the old personal hangers and two years work of worth that was 100% deleted and never used again because they swapped Game Engines.
Ryzen Zen 5 release imminent this Sunday. Computex 2024. RTX 5000 release likely in a couple of months
a different episode, yet so nice :)
But... But in lore, isn't the Polaris designed YEARS are SQ42? And it takes another five years to actually deeply? How can it feature at all in the campaign?
Star Citizen will get the first playable lore that new people gonna experience from Squadron 42 and it’s 2 DLC’s 👍🏻 I am looking forward to it and will be an supporter for as long as possible 👌🏻😎
I like the armchair comments from Expat, as she is pulling at strings, in how SC is a scam, without saying its a scam. All you need to know is, if you build it, they will come. Just enjoy the ride and stop reading into things too much Expat. It's getting tiring.
Chat can be so cruel, and I have seen the same in PU general chat. I have the bet that some folks are just trying to start something by being unconstructive (destructive)
Only the 890j and the Reclaimer are actually in-game, player flyable. (Soon the Idris) ALL of the rest are just wishful thinking.
Three out of thirteen capital ships, in twelve years, is NOT praise worthy. We are easily looking at another five to seven years!
Not taking into account the many, many other ships, that are not capital, and also not in-game, player flyable ships. Ten years?
I was a teenager when development started and will be 30 in August (2 months lol). It is crazy to think development will be ongoing when I am nearly 40 years old, but I know CIG intends to play for as much time as possible, so I do not doubt it.
Polaris will be arriving hopefully before the end of the year. I think the Javelin is supposed to be close, as well. While CIG hasn't said anything about it, video from players breaking into the ones that show up in-game suggest that it's getting close to completion.
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong, but by and large the non-capitol ships are largely in the game unless they're missing play loops (such as the Expanse), or were recently added as concepts (Ironclad). There are a couple of exceptions - specifically, the Hull B (reconcepted, causing problems with the landing struts) and the Liberator (no explanation provided by CIG). Doesn't mean that all of the existing ships are in good shape, though. *cough*Starfarer*cough*
I do feel kinda weird that I've spent over $1000 on Star Citizen, and a lot of that went into developing Squadron, and i don't even get a copy of it lol
i'll never understand this chronic need to interrupt other people 🤔
Thanks for the stream, here's hoping Crucible has to get bigger enough to be capital repair. If there is. Since it was sold as the best repair option.
o7 - btw, was going to get the same case but the order delay at the time was too long ;)
My only quarrel with your guys talk is you talk like we are getting near release and we are not. We don’t even have half the gameplay in at tier 0 much less in a final form for release. And that “rapid” increase in production of backlogged big ships ain’t happening. 18-24 months for over half an entire London team to make 1 big ship from 1 company. We are still at least another 10 years till we get to release. At a minimum. It definitely is not a scam. It is just a really poorly planned development that they still don’t have a clear picture of what they need to do.
I still love to do bunkers, and wish there was more enemies now and more creds per mission. Also Star Citizen PU has been more stable in the last 2 years than most AAA games at release.
Bunkers! there's nothing to do in bunkers, the NPC's stand with their backs to you, walk past, vanish and jitter through the floor, there's no challenge, its dire
Algared - Please list the specs of your new build. Just curious and thank!
''Earn Down'' makes common sense, its how ive now structured my current fleet, equally, there needs to be a group/org ethic to fully enjoy all of the game loops, you then don't need to waste good money on trinkets like FIGHTERS, you have the 3 core cheap fighters: Gladius/Buccaneer and Arrow, that's all you need to fly solo, which can be earned in a couple of hours in a crewed Mole.
Execute has been preaching his "earn down" gospel since before CIG unveiled plans for engineering, and he did not bother to revise, tweak or alter the already incorrect very poor advice to account for engineering. We have gameplay proof that crewed ships are the fastest money earners. Plus the economy will be scaled to make that even more so, in the future. Describe this "earn down structure" you use, please lol. No solo player in an Orion will be doing anything but spending several hours just running place to place around the ship, will Arrastra crews mine circles around you laughing all the way to the refinery over and over lol.
Nobody should buy buying expensive capitals unless they have a massive community to play with. And NOBODY should be telling solo players to go out and by the most expensive capital ship to solo. That is terrible advice, not founded on anything but personal biased.
@@lunamaria1048 Well if you in for the long haul then ''Earn Down'' makes good common sense, doing the opposite just creates a rod for your back. CCU's will cease at some point, BETA im told, all ships will be brought in game, and you'll most definitely need to earn down with $ ships/Vehicles, otherwise you'll be the perpetual grind monkey. Solo gameplay has now been relegated to a cute pass time with CIG's emphasis on highlighting ''Group/org gameplay'', engineering/fire management/master modes and the wonderful rebalancing are realigning ships and gameplay, and realising CR's original vision for SC. Good times
guys you seriouslly need ramp up sound. It is too quiet.
How does execute get invited to all these other events? OAIE, AIE….. I only get to go to IAE😢
Loved this whole conversation, and proud of Ex for cutting things short at the end to prioritize mental health. You two are an inspiration and I enjoy the countless hours I spend listening to your videos and voicing my opinion out loud along with y’all. 😂
Thanks for doing what you do!
They left out Perseus also large guns don't count lol, And Crucible is a Capital in my opinion just for the so fact its the only ship able to repair Capitals just putting that out their.
What about the vulcan?
These streams have become progressively harder to watch. I use to love this channel and expected you guys to blow up to the biggest SC channel ever. Now I'm just saddened when I see the same weekly complaints about 1 person not letting others speak.
Also, stop always blaming the marketing team. Chris Roberts is the CEO, he can tell the marketing people “no” anytime he wants to, so please stop,saying it’s marketing. It Chris’s company it’s his responsibility.
size 6 ships are sub cap