Hi Jordan! By building worlds, you eliminate the need to write out the rules. Instead, you build the rules directly into your worlds so you can forget about them. If you were to do worlds and write out the rules, you would be doing the same work twice.
@@LSATDemon Thank you. So if it is a game that only has about 6 possible worlds, would you recommend me solving the entire game with worlds before going to the questions, or is that too time-consuming? If so, where is the cut-off? Should I not solve the entire game if there are more than eight possible worlds? 9? 10? 11?
@@jordanrattanavong2655 There is no cutoff. Being concerned with how many worlds you make is like being concerned with the time spent per question. We don't care about how much time it takes. we care about you getting it right. If you split it 8 times and get it right? Congrats, you did it right. 10 times? Congrats. If you could have split it more, and miss even one question because of it? That's such a damn shame. Do you want to be as concise as you can be? Sure. But it's always going to be best to err on the side of splitting more to make it easier for myself, rather than some arbitrary cutoff.
@@LSATDemon This is great, thanks for this advice. I began subscribing to the Demon a month ago and the circle-slash method for making worlds has made previously difficult and even impenetrable games easy. The one about food at a luncheon would’ve given me such a hard time last year, but I just tried it again using circle-slash and made six different worlds and the questions were suddenly a breeze. If you’d told me before that it could ever be this easy I wouldn’t have believed you.
My favorite thing about the lsat demon crew is their passion, it really sets them apart
This dude is right up my alley, No BS.
I enjoy Matt being so matter-of-fact. He is a great teacher as well for these games.
I like the direct straightforwardness.
Should have gone to more of Matt's classes when I had a demon subscription.
This is fantastic, thank you so much for uploading.
Yayyyy!! Thank you for uploading! I loved this! Matt you’re great
Excellent. In worlds you can have a definite yes and no.
54:00 brilliant.
You rock! Thank you for the lessons
My only question is: how do I get my hands on one of these sick demon cardigans?
You can check out all Demon swag at lsat.link/merch and send your request, along with your mailing address, to help@lsatdemon.com
Why can’t the floater go to yandal because w could have 3 and y could have 2 and the rule that w has more than y would still be true.
I can’t read your white board on my phone. Would help if you didn’t use a fine point marker.
Never write rules though? Is that just for simple games? Shouldn’t we be writing the conditionals chains and all the jazz?
Hi Jordan! By building worlds, you eliminate the need to write out the rules. Instead, you build the rules directly into your worlds so you can forget about them. If you were to do worlds and write out the rules, you would be doing the same work twice.
@@LSATDemon Thank you. So if it is a game that only has about 6 possible worlds, would you recommend me solving the entire game with worlds before going to the questions, or is that too time-consuming? If so, where is the cut-off? Should I not solve the entire game if there are more than eight possible worlds? 9? 10? 11?
@@jordanrattanavong2655 There is no cutoff. Being concerned with how many worlds you make is like being concerned with the time spent per question. We don't care about how much time it takes. we care about you getting it right. If you split it 8 times and get it right? Congrats, you did it right. 10 times? Congrats. If you could have split it more, and miss even one question because of it? That's such a damn shame.
Do you want to be as concise as you can be? Sure. But it's always going to be best to err on the side of splitting more to make it easier for myself, rather than some arbitrary cutoff.
@@LSATDemon This is great, thanks for this advice. I began subscribing to the Demon a month ago and the circle-slash method for making worlds has made previously difficult and even impenetrable games easy. The one about food at a luncheon would’ve given me such a hard time last year, but I just tried it again using circle-slash and made six different worlds and the questions were suddenly a breeze. If you’d told me before that it could ever be this easy I wouldn’t have believed you.
Oh wait I see it! Sorry!