Why on earth do you people keep calling Steven Anderson a Pastor?? Anderson is about as far as the east is from the west from qualifying as a pastor, biblically speaking.
@@wallyweaver2724 if he is not qualified to be a pastor then please we should not be referring to him as a pastor. He's not. I've known many pastors their Christ like, they're loving and compassionate they're caring and kind, they sacrifice their life for their sheep. That is the attributes of a true pastor not somebody who gets in the pulpit and screams and curses. Steve Anderson acts like a wolf.
@@mistiroberts1576 Thank you. That is exactly the point I was trying to make. He's not a plumber or mechanic. His occupation is that of a pastor. I also unequivocally stated in the video that he isn't biblically qualified to be a pastor, so I don't know why people are splitting hairs on this.
@@mistiroberts1576 Don't call anyone Pastor! "But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren." (Matthew 23:8) The Lord doesn't want us to addess each other by titles!
This whole situation makes me sad. I don't really know how someone can go THIS far off on the deep end and not think "wow, this isn't really working for me or for anyone else, maybe something should change." Something is very wrong for things to have ever gotten to this point, and it's been like this for a while. If we don't understand God's love, we have completely misunderstood God. It doesn't matter EVEN if we get everything else right. If we do it out of hate, we've completely missed it.
A plain reading of Romans 1 would show that that passage IN CONTEXT is talking about the downfall of mankind in general.. Not some special tier of sinners beyond salvation. Romans 2 literally confirms this. Romans 2:1-3 1 Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things. 2 But we are sure that the judgment of God is according to truth against them which commit such things. 3 And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them which do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God? The reader is reproved for potentially doing the same things as are listed in Romans 1.. including the sin of men with men and women with women.
@@dough3821 I should add to that that I can actually make concessions and perhaps be convinced to agree the reprobate doctrine HOWEVER you'll never convince me that being a rainbow person makes one irredeemable. Period. Until then I reject the reprobate doctrine
Don't get me wrong, what's going on with him is super weird and he's certainly disqualified as Pastor imo, but to be fair though, he never taught that "submitting to his Lordship" in your daily lifestyle or turning from homosexual behavior must be added onto faith in Christ in order to be saved. The teaching never says that a person who believes on Christ to be saved must turn from anything except from unbelief on Christ alone for it. The teaching just says that those willingly engaging in homosexual behavior have never believed and won't believe. Whether that's the case or not, that's the teaching. Maybe not a huge distinction but I think we should be accurate. I think the Bible is also super clear that Christ returns just as he left, that is, visibly and openly, "immediately after the tribulation of those days" (not "before") at which time he sends the angels out to gather his elect (Matthew 24), described as like "a thief" (the same word used in 1 Thess) - but that's another discussion. Nobody is all right and nobody is all wrong, I guess that's the point I'm trying to make :)
A plain reading of Romans 1 would show that that passage IN CONTEXT is talking about the downfall of mankind in general.. Not some special tier of sinners beyond salvation. Romans 2 literally confirms this. Romans 2:1-3 1 Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things. 2 But we are sure that the judgment of God is according to truth against them which commit such things. 3 And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them which do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God? The reader is reproved for potentially doing the same things as are listed in Romans 1.. including the sin of men with men and women with women.
@@harpsdesire4200 I'm not disagreeing with you bro, that's the way I read it in Romans 1 and 2 as well. I'm just telling you what that teaching from Anderson is, and what that teaching is not.
Thanks for clarifying his view of the "reprobate doctrine." I did not explain that as well as I should have. I still think it's completely unbiblical, but I should have been more accurate in explaining it. I will disagree with you on the post-trib rapture, but I wouldn't mark and avoid someone on that issue alone. Anderson's vehement antisemitism is much more problematic in my opinion. Thanks for commenting and clarifying those points:)
@@dough3821 It's all cool, I get where you're coming from. As far as the catching up/gathering together/rapture, I think most people at my church disagree with me anyway, so no worries :) I can't speak to everything Anderson thinks about the Jews, as for myself, based on scriptures like Galatians 3 etc I don't think people with physically Jewish genes or half Jewish genes or whatever are really anything special in the eyes of God, any more than anyone else. Like other ethnic groups, many/most people who are Jewish have rejected Christ and have been going to hell for 2000 years, I don't think their fleshly genetics have done anything at all for them. I think that what matters, what makes one an heir of the promise and Abraham's seed is being in Christ, that it is about faith and not flesh. That Jesus is the seed, and being the people of God, the children of God, is about getting into Christ by believing on him. I hope nobody feels that makes me anti-semetic, I don't have any particular ill will towards them, and I want to see them saved as much as anyone else. You may be on a different page than me on all of that, but hopefully you get where I'm coming from, and I wouldn't break fellowship with you or anyone else on that account. Not unless it was a gospel issue of saying this or that group of people at some point in time can somehow receive eternal life by works or law keeping, and not by faith in the Messiah Jesus as being the just justifier, the one sacrifice for sins forever, that would be a foundational gospel issue, you know what I mean? Anyway, thanks for reading all this! :)
If you could, would you please expand on your point with regard to the New IFB's interpretation of Romans 10:9-13. Specifically with the sinners prayer. Thank you.
Sure! There are a few acceptable interpretations of Rom. 10:9-13 that do not contradict the gospel of grace. We know from many clear verses of Scripture, that one receives eternal life by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone. The first part of Rom. 10:10 affirms this: "For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness." Confessing Christ is not a requirement for receiving eternal life. The terms “saved” and “salvation” in this passage are not referring to eternal salvation, but to salvation from physical danger, trials, temptations, and/or divine discipline. Israel is primarily being addressed in the context, but the passage also certainly has relevance to believers living in the church age as well. I recently did a video on Romans 10:9-13 that I will post here: ua-cam.com/video/Ao0SVHrxgqY/v-deo.html Regardless of the view that one takes, there is no passage of Scripture where one is told that they must pray a particular prayer in order to be saved. I certainly have nothing against prayer, and it's okay to express one's faith to the Lord in prayer. However, it's not a necessary condition of salvation. I believe the NIFB is way off in making it a condition of receiving eternal life. As far as my understanding is concerned, they equate "confessing with the mouth" and "calling upon the Lord" with praying a sinner's prayer in order to "seal the deal" after one has believed. I don't want to misstate their view, but that is the best I can understand it. Thanks for the great question. God bless!
I have seen a lot of Steven Anderson related videos filling my algorythm lately and I would like to remind everyone that it is only by the grace of The Living God that it is not you in his place. Mathew 23 30-32 And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers. Some of you need to pause for a moment, examine your heart, and try to understand just what Jesus Christ was telling the Sanhedrin in that verse.
Jesus does not hate Israel, and God will never abandon the nation that He has chosen. "I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin" (Rom. 11:1).
@@dough3821 Nice, just stumbled on your channel. I agree with you on the crossless gospel issue, and still have respect for the brothers at GES . I had a debate on the crossless gospel (I think the first public formal debate on the issue) on Standing for Truth. I want to debate GES on the issue but they seem to not debate the topic. Also agree outer darkness is hell. I think GES and some brothers take certain passages too "experientially".
@biblelorax Are you by any chance Ditmar?? I watched a debate on the crossless gospel issue between Ditmar and Toronto Bible Study some weeks back. I thought Ditmar did an amazing job! I am with you on those issues you mentioned. I also have been helped a lot by GES in the past, but I have moved away from some of their views in more recent years.
@@dough3821 Yea that's me. I like GES because they stand for salvation being completely apart from our works, but I also can't get behind a lot of their doctrines.
@@biblelorax I am honored to have you comment on my channel. You did an amazing job in that debate! BTW, I read your book on the KJV and left a review on Amazon a while back. I also really appreciated that book! Keep up the great work! I hope to see you in more future debates :)
How did Jesus treat people who were committing sexual sin, i.e. the woman caught in adultery and the woman at the well? In the first case, he stated that he did not condemn her. For those who want to jump in and say "yeah, but he said go and sin no more", I assure you that he would say the same thing to you and to me. In the second case, he offered her living water. No condemnation, no judgment. Be like Jesus.
Right. No one must clean up their lives before trusting in Christ as Savior. After a person trusts in Christ, they become a child of God and can never go to hell. God becomes their Father, and He will discipline His children when they sin (Heb. 12:8). Homosexuality is a sin according to the plain teaching of Scripture, but it's not an unforgivable sin.
@tayzk5929 It's a figure of speech. I'll state it another way. Based on what we know about the Bible and about Jesus, we are all sinners. There's not a single human alive that Jesus would not look at and say "go and sin no more". The woman caught in adultery was not some kind of special sinner, she was just one of us.
Indeed. He also needs to be in jail. I honestly don't think a 3 day Psych will help this man. No amount of medication or therapy can help a person so far gone in their pride and arrogance. And right now he's extremely dangerous.
@@Bear-9558 there are 4 testimonials that he beats his children and wife with an electrical cord. That is very credible evidence and should be criminally looked into
Thanks for your encouraging comment! I don't usually get this many comments on full-length videos, and a lot of the comments are negative. Your comment really means a lot.
The reprobate doctrine is not about lordship salvation or that the sin is unforgivable. It is that the reprobate does not want to be saved in the first place. If someone actually wants saved they are not a reprobate
I probably should have explained that part more clearly. Nevertheless, it doesn't change the fact that homosexuals can be cleansed from their sins by simply trusting in Jesus Christ as Savior. God loves homosexuals, even though He hates their sin. He shed His blood on the cross as the payment for all sins, and anyone who simply believes in Him has everlasting life (John 3:16).
@@PB_324 You want to say Anderson isnt even saved? You can literally use that crappy logic on anyone you dont like who happens to know the bible. Maybe Satan is your father? Or maybe it's this YT creator's father? Witchhunt Christian commence. Gimme a break
I watched only the first 30 sec of the video and read some of the comments below. Clearly you are involved in some kind of cult group. I pray that you will come out of it and place your faith in the Lord Jesus Christ alone as your Savior.
@@dough3821 Matthew 12:36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. 37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned. Shalom.
If you're pre-tribulatuon, then I definitely question your judgment on Anderson's teachings. I'm not trying to totally absolve Steven Anderson either, sometimes he speaks too abrasively and vulgar, but we should view the sin he's condemning as even more vulgar. Can you be a saved Christian and live your whole life as a proud LGBT person? It's not for me to judge, but I would say that the Bible suggests that the answer is no. We are told that the path to Heaven is narrow, and none shall inherit it who are fornicators or effeminate. If you struggle with the sin of same sex desires and you accept that it's a sin and try to abstain from it, then I can see it being the same as other sins... but if the foundation of your life is built on being unapologetically LGBT, and especially if you defile Biblical marriage and raise children in an LGBT relationship, I think that Jesus would say " away from me you who work in lawlessness, I never knew you".
Pre-trib is a biblical doctrine. Matt. 7:21-23 has nothing to do with individual sins like LGBT. The unsaved people in that passage are condemned to hell because they never did the will of the Father; Instead, they were trusting in their works for kingdom entrance. John 6:39-40 shows us what the will of the Father is as it pertains to salvation. We are to simply believe on the Lord Jesus Christ for His free gift of eternal life.
You're video is as bad as he is. You constantly claiming 'homosexuality' is a sin is dangerous and harmful also. The bible itself has harmful doctrines and they are thrown out to/at others and causes harm. Problem is christians who even read the bible and that is rare but you and they do not read scholarship and just stick to apologetic crap 'arguments'
@@gmac6503 Thanks for your comment. The Bible is the inerrant Word of God, and it is absolutely perfect. It is the standard by which all human beings will be judged - whether you believe it to be true or not.
Sodomy causes the epitheal tissue in the area to tear and bleed and before AIDS and regular use of condoms, it was common for sodomites to have tapeworms front fecal matter that was exchanged. It is harmful; the Bible does nor hold any harmful doctrine but just out of curiosity name some of them
@@dough3821 yeah, it's inerrant because you say it is. Inerrancy is a very modern concept and it's really quite stupid. I know the Bible better than you do and as most Christians you obviously haven't read it either. Nothing new in the Evangelical world. This unlearned one says, 'The Bible is the standard by which all human beings will be judged' lol but the Jews know their Hebrew Bible better than you and the Christians who reinterpreted it According to this crappy fundamentalist here they're going to hell because you have to have the correct doctrine like this clown thinks he has who has no idea what the bible even "says!" This person doesn't study so this person doesn't know all the errors in the Bible. There are many, many Christians who know there are errors in the Bible and they don't believe in infallible nor the inerrant Bible because for one thing it has plenty of errors in it and they've studied it and they know better. Go away for a couple years and read and study your Bible.
@@dough3821 so this clown totally disregards what my comment was and goes on with some BS like they all do. He totally ignores my whole point that he's just as bad as Anderson and I gave the reasons why. It's like talking to dog poop
@@dough3821 OK, I'll see you in hell then. Problem is a lot of Christians believe in annihilationism and some even believe in universalism and Edward Fudge is the cause of all that because he knew his Bible better than eternal conscious torment people. But nevertheless, if you believe in hell you'll be there. I don't though. I was just kidding you about seeing you there. I won't be there. Don't forget the sunscreen.
Why on earth do you people keep calling Steven Anderson a Pastor?? Anderson is about as far as the east is from the west from qualifying as a pastor, biblically speaking.
@@wallyweaver2724 True. I said in the video that he isn't qualified to be a pastor.
@@wallyweaver2724 if he is not qualified to be a pastor then please we should not be referring to him as a pastor.
He's not.
I've known many pastors their Christ like, they're loving and compassionate they're caring and kind, they sacrifice their life for their sheep. That is the attributes of a true pastor not somebody who gets in the pulpit and screams and curses. Steve Anderson acts like a wolf.
He runs a church so even though he is grossly unqualified he is still technically a pastor
@@mistiroberts1576 Thank you. That is exactly the point I was trying to make. He's not a plumber or mechanic. His occupation is that of a pastor. I also unequivocally stated in the video that he isn't biblically qualified to be a pastor, so I don't know why people are splitting hairs on this.
@@mistiroberts1576 Don't call anyone Pastor! "But be not ye called Rabbi: for one is your Master, even Christ; and all ye are brethren." (Matthew 23:8) The Lord doesn't want us to addess each other by titles!
His son Isaac said today on Facebook that Anderson was involuntarily taken to a psyche ward yesterday.
What did the Facebook post say exactly? I am curious. Could you post it word-for-word?
@@christiangrowth6947 "I have it on good authority that my father was picked up yesterday afternoon and taken involuntarily to the psyche ward."
@@christiangrowth6947 Then when asked if he was joking, he said no.
He needs an exorcism
ua-cam.com/video/vW-Cs1Hh4ZQ/v-deo.htmlsi=HbRwgMscPY3p05pU
This whole situation makes me sad. I don't really know how someone can go THIS far off on the deep end and not think "wow, this isn't really working for me or for anyone else, maybe something should change." Something is very wrong for things to have ever gotten to this point, and it's been like this for a while.
If we don't understand God's love, we have completely misunderstood God. It doesn't matter EVEN if we get everything else right. If we do it out of hate, we've completely missed it.
why why do you keep calling him Pastor
he's not a pastor.
He's evil
he's not a pastor
his name is just Stephen Anderson
Thank you!
@@LornaBates-n8d Good point!
Romans says exactly the opposite from steven if one reads it carefully
A plain reading of Romans 1 would show that that passage IN CONTEXT is talking about the downfall of mankind in general.. Not some special tier of sinners beyond salvation. Romans 2 literally confirms this.
Romans 2:1-3
1 Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.
2 But we are sure that the judgment of God is according to truth against them which commit such things.
3 And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them which do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God?
The reader is reproved for potentially doing the same things as are listed in Romans 1.. including the sin of men with men and women with women.
Well stated. I completely agree!
@@dough3821 I should add to that that I can actually make concessions and perhaps be convinced to agree the reprobate doctrine HOWEVER you'll never convince me that being a rainbow person makes one irredeemable. Period.
Until then I reject the reprobate doctrine
Don't get me wrong, what's going on with him is super weird and he's certainly disqualified as Pastor imo, but to be fair though, he never taught that "submitting to his Lordship" in your daily lifestyle or turning from homosexual behavior must be added onto faith in Christ in order to be saved. The teaching never says that a person who believes on Christ to be saved must turn from anything except from unbelief on Christ alone for it. The teaching just says that those willingly engaging in homosexual behavior have never believed and won't believe. Whether that's the case or not, that's the teaching. Maybe not a huge distinction but I think we should be accurate.
I think the Bible is also super clear that Christ returns just as he left, that is, visibly and openly, "immediately after the tribulation of those days" (not "before") at which time he sends the angels out to gather his elect (Matthew 24), described as like "a thief" (the same word used in 1 Thess) - but that's another discussion.
Nobody is all right and nobody is all wrong, I guess that's the point I'm trying to make :)
Amen!!!
A plain reading of Romans 1 would show that that passage IN CONTEXT is talking about the downfall of mankind in general.. Not some special tier of sinners beyond salvation. Romans 2 literally confirms this.
Romans 2:1-3
1 Therefore thou art inexcusable, O man, whosoever thou art that judgest: for wherein thou judgest another, thou condemnest thyself; for thou that judgest doest the same things.
2 But we are sure that the judgment of God is according to truth against them which commit such things.
3 And thinkest thou this, O man, that judgest them which do such things, and doest the same, that thou shalt escape the judgment of God?
The reader is reproved for potentially doing the same things as are listed in Romans 1.. including the sin of men with men and women with women.
@@harpsdesire4200 I'm not disagreeing with you bro, that's the way I read it in Romans 1 and 2 as well. I'm just telling you what that teaching from Anderson is, and what that teaching is not.
Thanks for clarifying his view of the "reprobate doctrine." I did not explain that as well as I should have. I still think it's completely unbiblical, but I should have been more accurate in explaining it.
I will disagree with you on the post-trib rapture, but I wouldn't mark and avoid someone on that issue alone. Anderson's vehement antisemitism is much more problematic in my opinion.
Thanks for commenting and clarifying those points:)
@@dough3821 It's all cool, I get where you're coming from. As far as the catching up/gathering together/rapture, I think most people at my church disagree with me anyway, so no worries :)
I can't speak to everything Anderson thinks about the Jews, as for myself, based on scriptures like Galatians 3 etc I don't think people with physically Jewish genes or half Jewish genes or whatever are really anything special in the eyes of God, any more than anyone else. Like other ethnic groups, many/most people who are Jewish have rejected Christ and have been going to hell for 2000 years, I don't think their fleshly genetics have done anything at all for them.
I think that what matters, what makes one an heir of the promise and Abraham's seed is being in Christ, that it is about faith and not flesh. That Jesus is the seed, and being the people of God, the children of God, is about getting into Christ by believing on him.
I hope nobody feels that makes me anti-semetic, I don't have any particular ill will towards them, and I want to see them saved as much as anyone else. You may be on a different page than me on all of that, but hopefully you get where I'm coming from, and I wouldn't break fellowship with you or anyone else on that account. Not unless it was a gospel issue of saying this or that group of people at some point in time can somehow receive eternal life by works or law keeping, and not by faith in the Messiah Jesus as being the just justifier, the one sacrifice for sins forever, that would be a foundational gospel issue, you know what I mean?
Anyway, thanks for reading all this! :)
If you could, would you please expand on your point with regard to the New IFB's interpretation of Romans 10:9-13. Specifically with the sinners prayer.
Thank you.
Sure! There are a few acceptable interpretations of Rom. 10:9-13 that do not contradict the gospel of grace. We know from many clear verses of Scripture, that one receives eternal life by grace alone through faith alone in Christ alone. The first part of Rom. 10:10 affirms this: "For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness."
Confessing Christ is not a requirement for receiving eternal life. The terms “saved” and “salvation” in this passage are not referring to eternal salvation, but to salvation from physical danger, trials, temptations, and/or divine discipline. Israel is primarily being addressed in the context, but the passage also certainly has relevance to believers living in the church age as well. I recently did a video on Romans 10:9-13 that I will post here: ua-cam.com/video/Ao0SVHrxgqY/v-deo.html
Regardless of the view that one takes, there is no passage of Scripture where one is told that they must pray a particular prayer in order to be saved. I certainly have nothing against prayer, and it's okay to express one's faith to the Lord in prayer. However, it's not a necessary condition of salvation. I believe the NIFB is way off in making it a condition of receiving eternal life. As far as my understanding is concerned, they equate "confessing with the mouth" and "calling upon the Lord" with praying a sinner's prayer in order to "seal the deal" after one has believed. I don't want to misstate their view, but that is the best I can understand it.
Thanks for the great question. God bless!
I have seen a lot of Steven Anderson related videos filling my algorythm lately and I would like to remind everyone that it is only by the grace of The Living God that it is not you in his place.
Mathew 23 30-32
And say, If we had been in the days of our fathers, we would not have been partakers with them in the blood of the prophets. Wherefore ye be witnesses unto yourselves, that ye are the children of them which killed the prophets. Fill ye up then the measure of your fathers.
Some of you need to pause for a moment, examine your heart, and try to understand just what Jesus Christ was telling the Sanhedrin in that verse.
Wait, you still think Jesus hating israel is Gods elect?
Jesus does not hate Israel, and God will never abandon the nation that He has chosen. "I say then, Hath God cast away his people? God forbid. For I also am an Israelite, of the seed of Abraham, of the tribe of Benjamin" (Rom. 11:1).
Amen, you're free grace in terms of soteriology it sounds like, correct?
edit: saw your channel and seems like you are, cool. God bless brother.
@@biblelorax Yes, I hold to classic FG theology. Thanks for your kind words! God bless you :)
@@dough3821 Nice, just stumbled on your channel. I agree with you on the crossless gospel issue, and still have respect for the brothers at GES .
I had a debate on the crossless gospel (I think the first public formal debate on the issue) on Standing for Truth.
I want to debate GES on the issue but they seem to not debate the topic.
Also agree outer darkness is hell. I think GES and some brothers take certain passages too "experientially".
@biblelorax Are you by any chance Ditmar??
I watched a debate on the crossless gospel issue between Ditmar and Toronto Bible Study some weeks back. I thought Ditmar did an amazing job!
I am with you on those issues you mentioned. I also have been helped a lot by GES in the past, but I have moved away from some of their views in more recent years.
@@dough3821 Yea that's me.
I like GES because they stand for salvation being completely apart from our works, but I also can't get behind a lot of their doctrines.
@@biblelorax I am honored to have you comment on my channel. You did an amazing job in that debate!
BTW, I read your book on the KJV and left a review on Amazon a while back. I also really appreciated that book!
Keep up the great work! I hope to see you in more future debates :)
No control of his mouth!
How did Jesus treat people who were committing sexual sin, i.e. the woman caught in adultery and the woman at the well? In the first case, he stated that he did not condemn her. For those who want to jump in and say "yeah, but he said go and sin no more", I assure you that he would say the same thing to you and to me. In the second case, he offered her living water. No condemnation, no judgment. Be like Jesus.
Right. No one must clean up their lives before trusting in Christ as Savior. After a person trusts in Christ, they become a child of God and can never go to hell. God becomes their Father, and He will discipline His children when they sin (Heb. 12:8). Homosexuality is a sin according to the plain teaching of Scripture, but it's not an unforgivable sin.
Go and sin no more would be considered "judging "
Your "assurances" are meaningless, what the Bible says should matter to Christians not what you say.
@tayzk5929 It's a figure of speech. I'll state it another way. Based on what we know about the Bible and about Jesus, we are all sinners. There's not a single human alive that Jesus would not look at and say "go and sin no more". The woman caught in adultery was not some kind of special sinner, she was just one of us.
@@juliachildress2943 That's not true, all sin is not equally bad.
dude needs to step down!
Indeed. He also needs to be in jail. I honestly don't think a 3 day Psych will help this man. No amount of medication or therapy can help a person so far gone in their pride and arrogance. And right now he's extremely dangerous.
@Bear-9558 Child abuse and torture. Also for leaving sex toys around their young children.
@Bear-9558 he at the very least needs to be criminally investigated
@@Bear-9558 there are 4 testimonials that he beats his children and wife with an electrical cord. That is very credible evidence and should be criminally looked into
@@Bear-9558 but you as a good Christian want to ignore all this because he suits your hate mongering
Thank you for this video. 🎉
Thanks for your encouraging comment! I don't usually get this many comments on full-length videos, and a lot of the comments are negative. Your comment really means a lot.
Excellent job at misunderstanding the reprobate doctrine. You should listen to more of his preaching on the matter.
Thanks, but no thanks. I can't stand to listen to more than 30 sec of his ranting.
@@dough3821 Then dont comment on his preaching if you aren't man enough to listen, you limp wristed doughboy.
@@dough3821 Then you shouldn't make videos about him you silly goose.
The reprobate doctrine is not about lordship salvation or that the sin is unforgivable. It is that the reprobate does not want to be saved in the first place. If someone actually wants saved they are not a reprobate
I probably should have explained that part more clearly. Nevertheless, it doesn't change the fact that homosexuals can be cleansed from their sins by simply trusting in Jesus Christ as Savior. God loves homosexuals, even though He hates their sin. He shed His blood on the cross as the payment for all sins, and anyone who simply believes in Him has everlasting life (John 3:16).
Tell me what he said that is unbiblical
Even satan quotes the bible quite well.
Anderson is just like his father.
Anderson is uninterested in what the Bible says. He's got the gospel according to Steven and that's what he goes by.
Did you even watch the video?
@@PB_324 You want to say Anderson isnt even saved? You can literally use that crappy logic on anyone you dont like who happens to know the bible. Maybe Satan is your father? Or maybe it's this YT creator's father? Witchhunt Christian commence. Gimme a break
Anger , hate, bitterness and slander aaaaaall the time are unbiblical.
Re read Johns epistles and the whole jesus character until you get it.
Anderson is right about the homosexuals... He's just wrong about spousal discipline.
He's right that homosexuality is a sin. He's wrong to say they should put a bullet in their heads and that they are beyond God's forgiveness.
Romans 1 explained:
"Apostle to the homosexual and the transsexual": ua-cam.com/video/oMCcMX-rApM/v-deo.html
I watched only the first 30 sec of the video and read some of the comments below. Clearly you are involved in some kind of cult group. I pray that you will come out of it and place your faith in the Lord Jesus Christ alone as your Savior.
@@dough3821
Matthew 12:36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment.
37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.
Shalom.
If you're pre-tribulatuon, then I definitely question your judgment on Anderson's teachings. I'm not trying to totally absolve Steven Anderson either, sometimes he speaks too abrasively and vulgar, but we should view the sin he's condemning as even more vulgar.
Can you be a saved Christian and live your whole life as a proud LGBT person? It's not for me to judge, but I would say that the Bible suggests that the answer is no. We are told that the path to Heaven is narrow, and none shall inherit it who are fornicators or effeminate.
If you struggle with the sin of same sex desires and you accept that it's a sin and try to abstain from it, then I can see it being the same as other sins... but if the foundation of your life is built on being unapologetically LGBT, and especially if you defile Biblical marriage and raise children in an LGBT relationship, I think that Jesus would say " away from me you who work in lawlessness, I never knew you".
Pre-trib is a biblical doctrine. Matt. 7:21-23 has nothing to do with individual sins like LGBT. The unsaved people in that passage are condemned to hell because they never did the will of the Father; Instead, they were trusting in their works for kingdom entrance. John 6:39-40 shows us what the will of the Father is as it pertains to salvation. We are to simply believe on the Lord Jesus Christ for His free gift of eternal life.
@dough3821 I think you're wrong, but we can agree to disagree.
You're video is as bad as he is. You constantly claiming 'homosexuality' is a sin is dangerous and harmful also. The bible itself has harmful doctrines and they are thrown out to/at others and causes harm. Problem is christians who even read the bible and that is rare but you and they do not read scholarship and just stick to apologetic crap 'arguments'
@@gmac6503 Thanks for your comment. The Bible is the inerrant Word of God, and it is absolutely perfect. It is the standard by which all human beings will be judged - whether you believe it to be true or not.
Sodomy causes the epitheal tissue in the area to tear and bleed and before AIDS and regular use of condoms, it was common for sodomites to have tapeworms front fecal matter that was exchanged. It is harmful; the Bible does nor hold any harmful doctrine but just out of curiosity name some of them
@@dough3821 yeah, it's inerrant because you say it is. Inerrancy is a very modern concept and it's really quite stupid.
I know the Bible better than you do and as most Christians you obviously haven't read it either. Nothing new in the Evangelical world. This unlearned one says, 'The Bible is the standard by which all human beings will be judged' lol but the Jews know their Hebrew Bible better than you and the Christians who reinterpreted it According to this crappy fundamentalist here they're going to hell because you have to have the correct doctrine like this clown thinks he has who has no idea what the bible even "says!"
This person doesn't study so this person doesn't know all the errors in the Bible.
There are many, many Christians who know there are errors in the Bible and they don't believe in infallible nor the inerrant Bible because for one thing it has plenty of errors in it and they've studied it and they know better.
Go away for a couple years and read and study your Bible.
@@dough3821 so this clown totally disregards what my comment was and goes on with some BS like they all do. He totally ignores my whole point that he's just as bad as Anderson and I gave the reasons why. It's like talking to dog poop
@@dough3821 OK, I'll see you in hell then. Problem is a lot of Christians believe in annihilationism and some even believe in universalism and Edward Fudge is the cause of all that because he knew his Bible better than eternal conscious torment people. But nevertheless, if you believe in hell you'll be there. I don't though. I was just kidding you about seeing you there. I won't be there. Don't forget the sunscreen.