Traditional Anglican Mass - Demonstrated Ceremonial (No Commentary)
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 лют 2025
- A demonstration of the rite of Mass for the Feast of St Michael and All Angels using traditional western ceremonial, adapted to the 2019 Book of Common Prayer. This is a low Mass, presented without commentary or interruption. A tutorial version with instructive commentary is also available.
Link to the 2019 Prayer Book: bcp2019.anglic...
Link to a 2019 BCP Anglican Missal insert for the altar: drive.google.c...
Link to 'Ritual Notes': ia802801.us.ar...
Link to 'Anglican Services': anglicanhistory...
Link to the Parish Press (liturgical resources): theparishpress...
www.stfrancisda...
Are you blessed by this ministry? Consider blessing us with your financial support.
www.stfrancisda...
It's like roman latin mass but reformed and in english. Very beautiful. I am a lutheran myself and I admire liturgical beauty and traditions. God bless! I wish that every service, both in anglican and lutheran churches, would look like that.
I wonder why you refer to is as "reformed". It doesn't seem to have anything that is distinctively reformed in character.
@@erc9468 I'm not a theologian but I think it might somehow differ doctrinaly from the roman latin mass. That's what I meant by saying that this liturgy is 'reformed'.
There’s the ordinariate who is exactly like this church but it’s Catholic
Old catholic priest here i absolutely love the beauty of this mass. God bless you Father
Lovely presentation. I loved my time as a server in traditional Anglican churches, including an English Missal one, and another with a full High Mass using a modification of the Scottish Liturgy. I appreciate your channel. Best wishes from Scotland.
Thank you for this, Father. God bless your ministry.
As a Latin Rite Catholic I was able to recegnize some of the words. God bless.
I'm not sure how this is traditional Anglicanism. Traditional Anglicanism would be a Priest vested in Cassock, Surplice, and Cope, celebrating from the north end, and reading the 1662 BCP service.
Low Church Anglicanism was a postreformation aberration that thrived only a good 200 years. This is way older and more glorious.
In the US, we can’t use the 1662. The king is not prayed for.
@pipsheppard6747 Yes you can. You just change "save the king" to "save the state" and then omit the prayers for royal family. But also nobody is gonna come in and stop you if you pray for them anyway
@@sameash3153 I love the 1662, a beautiful liturgy. However, if the CoE, after the Revolution, had been so kind as to consecrate bishops for the US, then Seabury would not have had to run off to Scotland for such, having then to agree with the modification of the liturgy.
@@pipsheppard6747 Still, there’s nothing 18th century about this ceremony. Even with the Scottish Communion, the service was conducted in surplice and black scarf, and at the northside (or “right side” as the 1892 has it) of the Table. I have an Anglo-Catholic background, but when this is called a “traditional” Anglican service, with no caveats, they’re trying to erase the history of the church.
Perfection.
There is no "was" (Thanks be to God!) A resounding "IS"...every day. We add lotsa servers, vestments, linens, incense, choirs and organ for High Masses and Solemn High Masses! Our Sacrifice from which Blessings flow
When was this liturgy and all his trappings the standard practice within Anglicanism?
Before and after reformation.
Sarum Rite, don't you know that it's English? This liturgy developed mostly from the Sarum Rite therefore it's before Reformation on that basis.
@@scripturetraditionandreaso1132 Pre-Reformation was Roman Catholic.
It has never been the standard practice within Anglicanism. It is an accepted practice
Never.
More Catholic than most Romans!
As a catholic I find it beautiful and agree that we have a lot of modernized novus ordos, but we also have many traditional masses and churches.
Having traditional aesthetics doesn't make something Catholic. Anglican liturgy is schismatic as best, heretical at worst, and always illicit
@@DoctorDewgonghahaha!!! … wrong.
@@DoctorDewgong And invalid.
@@emmanuelsantanna204 it can be valid on rare occasions. Some Anglican priests do actually have valid orders, so their Mass would be valid but illicit
as a catholic this sounds like a regular mass but with a funny layout
And different wording
Great rector
Cual es el nombre de la melodía con órgano al principio?
Traditional Anglicans use the 1928
BCP, some of whose versicles and responses taken from the Psalms go back to the earliest celebrations of the Christian Community. This doesn't even touch the antiquity of many of the Collects and prayers. See Shepherd's commentary for proof.
"IS" still never a "WAS" in my parish my 60 years and counting
apart from the eucharistic prayer this is word for word identical to the Ordinariate Liturgy
Not exactly. The prayers at the foot of the altar have slightly different wording as well as other prayers, the Kyrie is tripled, the introduction to the Gospel is different, and the propers may be different. The "Cannon Missae" also has a lot of the traditional gestures, and it seems like a rewording of the actual Roman Cannon.
What year Prayer Book was this liturgy taken from?
2019 book in traditional language
Yes, beautiful. But really traditional. The rite of Sarum would be more "traditional".
There exist about 30+ rites (including the Eastern and Oriental Orthodox). Each serves a purpose for a local church.
The important matter is the Eucharist, not the form or rubrics.
Don't get caught up with form over substance.
Among other things- Anglican services don't have deliberately inaudible prayers by the priest/presbyter. True Anglicans don't worship the elements.
If they're inaudible, how do you know?
@@TimothyMatkin I know they are inaudible because I couldn't hear them.
My second sentence was based on the way the celebrant bows before the bread and wine, elevates the bread with bells ringing, using the sign of the cross over the elements and so on on. My main objection to all this is that use of the word "Anglican". True Anglicans do not regard the eucharist as a sacrifice nor do we believe in the real presence. We have communion tables, not altars.
The Anglican Catholic rites are more Catholic then the Roman Catholic rites, I left the Roman Catholic church because of where that church was heading. No we are not part of the Church of England.
Coptic catholic who was a woman catholic are y'all catholics but a little diffren
Ad Orientum
Ad orientem
B.C.P
Cranmer would turn in his grave (and that’s a good thing !!!)
Based