Kostya's Blueprint: Analytical Skill

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 30

  • @ajarnray4115
    @ajarnray4115 5 років тому +6

    Nice video and a great concept I"m looking forward towards the third part.

  • @stevewild374
    @stevewild374 4 роки тому +1

    Got to agree about Leko. Great commentator. Enjoyed Judit Polgar commentating recently. Full of ideas.

  • @stefanmitf739
    @stefanmitf739 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for all the great content, I appreciate it alot!

  • @PeterSodhi
    @PeterSodhi 3 роки тому +2

    Amazing content - maybe the best Chess Teacher out there...

    • @IMKostyaKavutskiy
      @IMKostyaKavutskiy  3 роки тому +4

      Thanks! Make sure to check out ua-cam.com/users/chessdojo

  • @zantafication
    @zantafication 5 років тому

    This series has terrific content and is very well produced. Thanks for the video!

  • @Extirpo
    @Extirpo 2 роки тому

    Thx my man. Much appreciated 👍

  • @MindManipulatorX
    @MindManipulatorX 5 років тому +2

    Thx, man. You are really helpful

  • @PaulHobbs23
    @PaulHobbs23 3 роки тому +1

    This video series is amazing

  • @josephwolensky2685
    @josephwolensky2685 3 роки тому +1

    Great video !

  • @tomekduresov706
    @tomekduresov706 5 років тому +5

    1200-1400 is an intermidiate player, damn, Im better that I thought..

  • @drpawnkwp
    @drpawnkwp 5 років тому +1

    Lovely

  • @yahya89able
    @yahya89able 5 років тому

    You are doing great job, thanks a lot

  • @vasilisvasilakopoulos2498
    @vasilisvasilakopoulos2498 5 років тому +1

    Yuri Averbakh and later Mark Dvoretsky , considered that analytical skill is actually the most important for novices to develop and the best way to do that is endgames.Averbakh and many other players and trainers(Vasily Smyslov and Aleksey Suetin were 2 of them) even believed that beginners must study endgames before anything else to first improve their analytical skill. What's your opinion on this?

  • @kavitanagar7208
    @kavitanagar7208 5 років тому +1

    Sir plz make video how to calculate combination

  • @Samw1seGamegee
    @Samw1seGamegee 5 років тому

    Loving the channel, Kostya. Do you have a video reviewing arves? I would like to utilize that website to work on some endgame studies, but I am unsure how best to go about using the site. It is frustrating since the solutions are not hidden on screen. Any advice for this 1704 provisional player?

  • @josephwolensky2685
    @josephwolensky2685 3 роки тому +1

    When you go thru a collection of annotated games, do you recommend playing thru all the presented alternative lines or do you tend to stay closer to the main moves played during the actual game? Im currently going thru Fischers 60 memorable games, and at times I sometimes find all the sub line exploration a little overwhelming. I however can see the benefit of being able to consider the pros and cons presented by various options at a given juncture in a game.

    • @IMKostyaKavutskiy
      @IMKostyaKavutskiy  3 роки тому +1

      I would try to understand the verbal annotations before delving into the variations. It's possible the book is too advanced for you, in which case there are many books geared for a lower level -- Chernev, Nunn, etc

  • @youngt2827
    @youngt2827 3 роки тому

    Good shit

  • @swaroop2518
    @swaroop2518 3 роки тому +2

    Hi kostya, I want to ask that at what strength a player should start studying annonated classical games?
    Like I am around 1100, so am I qualifued to study alekhine games? Will It help me in any way or will It be too advanced for me?

    • @IMKostyaKavutskiy
      @IMKostyaKavutskiy  3 роки тому +2

      It depends on the annotations, depending on the author they can be advanced. But I would try it and see how you feel. If you take your time you will certainly learn quite a bit

  • @MrBamshy
    @MrBamshy 5 років тому

    I use chesstempo.com for tactics too

  • @Paul-Feyerabend-C-Lévi-Strauss

    Kostya Kostenyvk

  • @jaylenlenear7850
    @jaylenlenear7850 5 років тому +1

    not mentioning Carlsen for strategic players is disrespectful lol jk

    • @jaylenlenear7850
      @jaylenlenear7850 5 років тому

      @@IMKostyaKavutskiy I figured. GM Serper said the same thing in one of his articles lol

  • @Yashisbetter
    @Yashisbetter 9 місяців тому

    Q1: I dont know my style yet, do i chose it or do i figure it out? if so then how do i figure it out?
    Q2: im going through a book you recommended jacob-aagaard-excelling-at-chess-calculation-capitalizing-on-tactical-chances. you said that you should only count the times on when you are calculating not reading a chess book or watching videos. How would i go through the book and start calculating while tracking the amount of time i only spent of calculating. What types of books do i read to only focus on calculating and critical positions? Can give me a selection of books that only have critical positions of bobby fisher or other great players.