I've been so frustrated trying to achieve this crisp look, but everytime i end up increasing the sharpness or the practical contrast of the lighting setup, but never really achieve that crisp and clear look... You're a legend
That sharpness tip is great! I did have a video or two where I looked too sharp but I didn't know what to do with it. I'll try filming with my sharpness at a lower number :D
Hi there! Great video and content! I have a question? What settings you use for clear background. No blurry background! I from shutter speed? At 6:58 , I need to know the settings from right side! That with no blurred background! Thank you very much! 🤗
That specific clip is shot with a gopro. I you want to achieve that with a mirrorless camera or dslr, you have to stop down the aperture all the way to f/22 or even more if you can. But even then it will be difficult to get a completely sharp background when your shooting very close to your subject. Not to mention you'll lose a lot of light...
So I have the 22mm f2.0 canon lens. I bought it because it has f2.0 whereas the kit lens for the m50 has f3.5 But now you say f3.5 for the 22mm lens is sharper than f2.0 I'm confused. I thought the lower the number (2.0) the better?
I think that what he meant is the entire image and the background separation. The higher the f-stop the more things in the image are visible, making the bokeh effect less significant. So f2.0 would have you in focus while your background is blurred, but the higher you put the f-stop the less blurred your background will be. The kit lens has an f-stop of 3.5 to begin with, so it is 'sharper', although you can easily put your 22mm at f3.5.
@@ElusiveFrame so f3.5 would produce sharper image for the 22m. but are we talking about the image in focus (talking head) cause that's what has to be sharp. i still don't get it if f3.5 would result in sharper image why would you use f2.0? yes to have the background more blurry but if that results in less sharp image in focus than who wants that?
Hey Gert, check out this article: petapixel.com/2018/06/15/the-best-aperture-for-landscape-photography/ It's about landscape photography but that doesn't matter. Any lens has its sharpness & detail rendering sweet spot around 3 stops from the widest aperture but that doesn't mean the widest aperture is unusable. But in this video, I talk specifically about getting a crisp image with lots of detail. So, in that case it's best not to shoot at the widest aperture but stop down a bit. But I do use the widest aperture a lot too, specifically in low light situations where I don't want to increase the ISO because it would cause noise. And finally, some lenses don't have that much difference in softness between the apertures.It depends on design and construction quality.
Lovely tips! What would be the Canon M50 aperture sweet spot (on the kit lens ) when filming 2-3 people or more,in order everyone to be in focus plus to have crisp video at the end ? I believe all should be done with MF ? Thank you beginner here
Thank you for a very informative video, especially useful for us beginners! One thing though, I´ve been told it is better with slight underexposed video as you can always lift up the shadows in post, but not highlights to the same degree?
When shooting in a Log profile, it's always better to over-expose to avoid noise in the shadows. How much you should overexpose depends on the profile and camera. Sony S-Log 3 for example should be overexposed by 1.7 stops more or less for the best results. These video profiles don't behave like RAW photo files.
Just get rid of sharpness and noise reduction and it will be a banger. I hate that old sony handycam processing because I can't simply turn it off or even adjust it, and footage becomes very eye bleeding sometimes
I shot 2 clips on 2 different Canon cameras in slow motion and they look so soft as if someone put noise reduction on it. The common thing of both clips is that it was shot in slow motion (high fps) and I believe the highlights were blown out. I don’t know why they’re not sharp, what am I doing wrong
@@JorisHermans Iso was between 100-500, shutter speed was double my fps (so first clip was 120 because it was 60fps and the second clip was 250 for 120fps), and my aperture was about f/1.8. I can show you the clips, they look as if someone put noise reduction on it, it's not sharp for some reason
@@robertdora7026 ha, I know some people wanna go straight to the important stuff! 😊 These days I always try not to forget to add chapters so you can skip parts 👌🏻
@@JorisHermans true. I very happily viewed your fun intro ☺️ I just posted the start time of your analysis both for some others and also for myself if in the future I come back to it and quickly want to view the first point or 2 of yours. Thanks again 🙏🙏
It really depends on what you do, but usually the 22mm f2.0 is a great recommendation to get after the kit lens. I've been using mine for a while and it's amazing as a 2nd lens :)
Damn he called my camera out Sony a7iii 😢😅 yeah I just shot a video, park setting, there was a lot of sun, I didn’t have an ND filter, ANYWAYS. I hate how the quality came out. I look a little blurry. Mind you, I’m shooting with a sigma 28-70. What gives. It’s pretty frustrating.
We want sharp video not bokeh...help stamp out bokeh...how many photos or videos do you see with sharp background? Hardly any...eveyone is tied to bokeh for some reason...probably copying what they think is acceptable video by a famous UA-cam creator.
![Get SHARP videos on SONY Alpha [a6000 Settings, Lenses, Export Settings]](/img/n.gif)
Who likes it CRISP!? 💥
Thanks for watching. Love you all! 🙏🏻❤️
CRISP = Cool Really Interesting Super Professional
I've been so frustrated trying to achieve this crisp look, but everytime i end up increasing the sharpness or the practical contrast of the lighting setup, but never really achieve that crisp and clear look... You're a legend
That sharpness tip is great!
I did have a video or two where I looked too sharp but I didn't know what to do with it. I'll try filming with my sharpness at a lower number :D
Yeah, in camera sharpening usually looks a lot harsher than if you do it in Premiere or something like that...
Thanks so for the detailed explanation. Please this setting can I also apply it on canon m6 MarkII?
Yes! Most of this you can apply to most cameras.
Super informational video. Thanks. By the way on a Sony camera what dial do you shoot on personally the M dail or the movie dial?
I love it 😍 You have an *AWESOME* way of editing your footage together! I love the *cinematography* of it 😯 Awesome work! _-Felix_
Your video is so great helped for my filming...THANKS..!!!
Crisp 🔥 Thanks 👍🏼 This video was nice and crisp 👌🏼
Hi there! Great video and content! I have a question? What settings you use for clear background. No blurry background! I from shutter speed? At 6:58 , I need to know the settings from right side! That with no blurred background! Thank you very much! 🤗
That specific clip is shot with a gopro. I you want to achieve that with a mirrorless camera or dslr, you have to stop down the aperture all the way to f/22 or even more if you can. But even then it will be difficult to get a completely sharp background when your shooting very close to your subject. Not to mention you'll lose a lot of light...
Great explanation and examples! Just found your channel and immediately subbed ;)
Thanks and welcome! 😊🙏🏻
So I have the 22mm f2.0 canon lens. I bought it because it has f2.0 whereas the kit lens for the m50 has f3.5 But now you say f3.5 for the 22mm lens is sharper than f2.0 I'm confused. I thought the lower the number (2.0) the better?
I think that what he meant is the entire image and the background separation. The higher the f-stop the more things in the image are visible, making the bokeh effect less significant.
So f2.0 would have you in focus while your background is blurred, but the higher you put the f-stop the less blurred your background will be. The kit lens has an f-stop of 3.5 to begin with, so it is 'sharper', although you can easily put your 22mm at f3.5.
@@ElusiveFrame so f3.5 would produce sharper image for the 22m. but are we talking about the image in focus (talking head) cause that's what has to be sharp. i still don't get it if f3.5 would result in sharper image why would you use f2.0? yes to have the background more blurry but if that results in less sharp image in focus than who wants that?
@@gertleroy The sharpness he mentioned applies only to the background blur.
Regarding the entire image, the 22mm is sharper than the kit lebs overall.
@@ElusiveFrame thanks
Hey Gert, check out this article: petapixel.com/2018/06/15/the-best-aperture-for-landscape-photography/
It's about landscape photography but that doesn't matter. Any lens has its sharpness & detail rendering sweet spot around 3 stops from the widest aperture but that doesn't mean the widest aperture is unusable. But in this video, I talk specifically about getting a crisp image with lots of detail. So, in that case it's best not to shoot at the widest aperture but stop down a bit. But I do use the widest aperture a lot too, specifically in low light situations where I don't want to increase the ISO because it would cause noise. And finally, some lenses don't have that much difference in softness between the apertures.It depends on design and construction quality.
Awesome tips!
Lovely tips!
What would be the Canon M50 aperture sweet spot (on the kit lens ) when filming 2-3 people or more,in order everyone to be in focus plus to have crisp video at the end ? I believe all should be done with MF ? Thank you beginner here
Amazing!
Great video.
Can you adjust sharpness when filming in log?
Hey! When i film with my canon 1200d, it always ends up being a bit blurry and not Sharp, even if I set the focus on my face, it still is blurry!?
Cheers so much 😊 I still hate too soft watching some of my video now to see if I like it or not ❤
You are very good man
Thanks, man! And thanks for watching 🙏🏻💥
Thank you for a very informative video, especially useful for us beginners! One thing though, I´ve been told it is better with slight underexposed video as you can always lift up the shadows in post, but not highlights to the same degree?
When shooting in a Log profile, it's always better to over-expose to avoid noise in the shadows. How much you should overexpose depends on the profile and camera. Sony S-Log 3 for example should be overexposed by 1.7 stops more or less for the best results. These video profiles don't behave like RAW photo files.
@@JorisHermans What about video shot in standard profiles? Thank you for your answer!
I LOVE CRISP!
Yes! Crisp is the best!😊🙏🏻
My videos aren't smooth when I'm panning. What am I doing wrong? 30 FPS, 1/80 shutter speed, IBIS and vibration compensation on.
Just get rid of sharpness and noise reduction and it will be a banger. I hate that old sony handycam processing because I can't simply turn it off or even adjust it, and footage becomes very eye bleeding sometimes
I shot 2 clips on 2 different Canon cameras in slow motion and they look so soft as if someone put noise reduction on it. The common thing of both clips is that it was shot in slow motion (high fps) and I believe the highlights were blown out. I don’t know why they’re not sharp, what am I doing wrong
What settings are you using? ISO, shutter, aperture, framerate?
@@JorisHermans Iso was between 100-500, shutter speed was double my fps (so first clip was 120 because it was 60fps and the second clip was 250 for 120fps), and my aperture was about f/1.8. I can show you the clips, they look as if someone put noise reduction on it, it's not sharp for some reason
1:45 Tips begin
But what about my super interesting small talk 🤔😎
@@JorisHermans I liked it too 😎 Thanks for the Greta video 🙏
@@robertdora7026 ha, I know some people wanna go straight to the important stuff! 😊 These days I always try not to forget to add chapters so you can skip parts 👌🏻
@@JorisHermans true. I very happily viewed your fun intro ☺️ I just posted the start time of your analysis both for some others and also for myself if in the future I come back to it and quickly want to view the first point or 2 of yours. Thanks again 🙏🙏
in the last video I asked you what lens should I get you didn't answer
i have only the m50 kit lens
It really depends on what you do, but usually the 22mm f2.0 is a great recommendation to get after the kit lens. I've been using mine for a while and it's amazing as a 2nd lens :)
Damn he called my camera out Sony a7iii 😢😅 yeah I just shot a video, park setting, there was a lot of sun, I didn’t have an ND filter, ANYWAYS. I hate how the quality came out. I look a little blurry. Mind you, I’m shooting with a sigma 28-70. What gives. It’s pretty frustrating.
We want sharp video not bokeh...help stamp out bokeh...how many photos or videos do you see with sharp background? Hardly any...eveyone is tied to bokeh for some reason...probably copying what they think is acceptable video by a famous UA-cam creator.
I think you're confused about what bokeh is. Bokeh doesn't mean not sharp... 🤔
Speak for yourself.
... omg
😱
DUDE U DRAGE A LOT TO START
YESS!! 👍🏻😘