Analysis: Why do Chinese manufacturers dominate in so many sectors?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 кві 2024
  • China is providing nine times as much state aid for their manufacturers as developed economies in the OECD, who are lagging behind when it comes to spending on green tech and manufacturing.
    The data is a critical part of the explanation for Chinese dominance in certain fields, and part of the explanation for why the UK has seen its manufacturing base shrink so rapidly in recent years.
    Read more: news.sky.com/topic/china-5869
    #china #manufacturing #data #skynews
    SUBSCRIBE to our UA-cam channel for more videos: / skynews
    Follow us on Twitter: / skynews
    Like us on Facebook: / skynews
    Follow us on Instagram: / skynews
    Follow us on TikTok: / skynews
    For more content go to news.sky.com and download our apps: Apple itunes.apple.com/gb/app/sky-n... Android play.google.com/store/apps/de...
    Sky News Daily podcast is available for free here: podfollow.com/skynewsdaily/
    Sky News videos are now available in Spanish here/Los video de Sky News están disponibles en español aquí: / @skynewsespanol
    To enquire about licensing Sky News content, you can find more information here: news.sky.com/info/library-sales

КОМЕНТАРІ • 309

  • @user-cu2es6ok6j
    @user-cu2es6ok6j Місяць тому +142

    The US and the west unfairly dorminated the world economies and no one complained.
    Mind your business

    • @fidelcastro4960
      @fidelcastro4960 29 днів тому +1

      Absolutely

    • @123_1
      @123_1 29 днів тому +2

      When state subsidized Chinese comanies crush competitors with artificially low prices, and raise price when no competiotors left, it's your business too...

    • @user-cu2es6ok6j
      @user-cu2es6ok6j 29 днів тому +13

      @@123_1 tell your govt to subsidise too.
      I thought they subsidise all those companies by the wars they wage world over.
      Mind your business.

    • @user-cu2es6ok6j
      @user-cu2es6ok6j 29 днів тому +6

      @@123_1 am sure even slavary was subsidised by the western govts

    • @ahkoy973
      @ahkoy973 29 днів тому

      At least China competes without resorting to colonisation, slavery and looting other nations through invasion

  • @mewanrocks
    @mewanrocks Місяць тому +162

    This analysis shows that one should mind their own business without poking other people’s affairs.

    • @123_1
      @123_1 29 днів тому

      No, this analysis shows how some players are not playing according to rules.. They mind their own business, right... but then they should be kicked off our markets!

    • @mewanrocks
      @mewanrocks 29 днів тому +3

      As per my experience of what happened in the world so far, there were no rules for west. Only when ASIA started to develop, the “rules “ started to appear.

    • @123_1
      @123_1 29 днів тому

      @@mewanrocksWorld Trade Organization regulates government subsidies

    • @binghong9813
      @binghong9813 29 днів тому +2

      ​@mewanrocks . The "rules " were created by one side. When the other side, using these "rules" beat them in their game the first side cry foul. This is the western "rules based order ".

    • @123_1
      @123_1 29 днів тому

      Maybe the rules were created by the West, but China accepted that rules. China accepted that rules but violates them...

  • @qliu1998jp
    @qliu1998jp Місяць тому +158

    Doesn’t that mean Chinese government is more smarter than other governments?

    • @123_1
      @123_1 29 днів тому +2

      No, they are dependent on our markets... When all country do the same: subsidizing their own industry by tax payers money, to sell their products in other countries... where will they sell all these goods? Tax payers will not have engough money anymore... nowhere... It is a destructive competition...

    • @mariajiao4855
      @mariajiao4855 29 днів тому

      ​@@123_1 Hey, I don't hear Chinese people complaining. Also if Biden decides to subsidize Chinese people purchase with their government money, we Chinese have no problem with that. Why the hell haven't started doing that?

    • @johnc1873
      @johnc1873 29 днів тому

      @@123_1 nah chinese government far better and more qualified than anywhere in the world

    • @BruceJ999
      @BruceJ999 29 днів тому

      ​@@123_1That's called Capitalism and its highly encouraged by the West but it's not encouraged when someone beat their a**😂.

    • @samuelhasudungan6476
      @samuelhasudungan6476 29 днів тому +3

      Yeah, at least their state (government) are doing the right good things, in this context

  • @chinpinhon
    @chinpinhon 29 днів тому +30

    In other words, what they are trying to say that China is so dominant because of aid from the state. If it is that simple, every country could replicate that and nullify China's dominance. Sour grapes in my opinion.

  • @dollgoo-jx8fv
    @dollgoo-jx8fv Місяць тому +105

    The British Empire began to discuss “fairness”

    • @LearningStuffRO
      @LearningStuffRO Місяць тому +8

      well said !

    • @leejo5160
      @leejo5160 29 днів тому +6

      there is no physical british empire anymore but there is a mental one in some people's head

    • @WalkOverHotCoal
      @WalkOverHotCoal 29 днів тому +1

      @@leejo5160 Try the G7.

    • @Toodyslexicforyou
      @Toodyslexicforyou 26 днів тому

      Or maybe thatcher sold of our country. Cope 😂😂😂

    • @WalkOverHotCoal
      @WalkOverHotCoal 25 днів тому +1

      @@Toodyslexicforyou And Boris Johnson shoveled the last shovelful of dirt over it !

  • @chdv5736
    @chdv5736 29 днів тому +30

    British still thinks it can dominate on the global stage is cute

    • @brianliew5901
      @brianliew5901 29 днів тому +1

      She still can if she started working on it instead of crying about it. 😭😭😭😭😭

  • @sonicmonkey888
    @sonicmonkey888 Місяць тому +95

    What's wrong with that😂

  • @Hypocrites-507
    @Hypocrites-507 Місяць тому +90

    China produces cheap n reliable goods for all people can afford to buy n enjoy

    • @123_1
      @123_1 28 днів тому +1

      ...and reliable propagandist trolls

    • @Hypocrites-507
      @Hypocrites-507 28 днів тому +4

      Truth hurt 80% of world population can’t afford to buy products from western countries 😂😂😂

    • @pccitizen1647
      @pccitizen1647 27 днів тому +3

      ​@@123_1yeah, the truths hurts. Go on, enjoy your cup of tea and your nap

  • @mikejohn2999
    @mikejohn2999 29 днів тому +28

    Is called focusing on your own country instead of looking for who to fight with

  • @petergreen5337
    @petergreen5337 Місяць тому +120

    1) The Chinese government has a STRATEGY : development.
    2) The Chinese government believes and invests in manufacturing.

    • @lofu32
      @lofu32 Місяць тому

      Sounds like rest of the world like Mexico, India and etc. So are we boycotting third worlds now

    • @LawrenceReitan
      @LawrenceReitan Місяць тому

      The Chinese government is a DICTATORSHIP: No thanks

    • @arreydharma5784
      @arreydharma5784 Місяць тому

      Sure. Cope hard, cope 😂

    • @yangray6400
      @yangray6400 Місяць тому

      yes, they are all on foodbank and don't have health care. 🤩🙃@@johnmarkrobinson2924

    • @boiscooka232
      @boiscooka232 29 днів тому +4

      ​@@arreydharma5784temu is how strong Chinese manufacturing products 😂

  • @ckwong1533
    @ckwong1533 29 днів тому +30

    The main role of government is to help the country to prosper isn't it.
    Why complain..

  • @isaactchingamzengereza9413
    @isaactchingamzengereza9413 Місяць тому +83

    What about fighting proxy wars? Who is spending more?

    • @straight_razor
      @straight_razor 28 днів тому

      What about giving tax payer’s money away to other countries when that money is needed here at home in the USA. We give billions to China then turn around and borrow it back with interest. Foreign aid is nothing more than theft by congress of US citizens so that the congressional members can get rich from the kickbacks. Hence, China is leading because the imperialist West, Including but not limited to the USA, is more corrupt.

    • @PrimalDesign
      @PrimalDesign 28 днів тому +6

      If they make a chart in "wars involved", then that chart will very well look very much like that with US ahead of everyone else. Lol

    • @StrataVision
      @StrataVision 28 днів тому

      Russia doesnt count, because it's normal war, not some proxy weak sh*t.

  • @blakewang9295
    @blakewang9295 29 днів тому +17

    I thought they didn’t have a lot of money to support their industry. This means their government works more efficiently. All other governments are just wasting their taxpayer’s money.

    • @brianliew5901
      @brianliew5901 29 днів тому

      Most other governments' taxpayers money are in the pockets of their beloved politicians. 🤑🤑🤑🤑

  • @willeisinga2089
    @willeisinga2089 Місяць тому +58

    Nothing wrong with that. China helps Companies to Prosper. UK economy is sooo small.

    • @noke258
      @noke258 Місяць тому +1

      UK gdp per capita is 10x that of china and is the 6th largest in the world.

    • @boiscooka232
      @boiscooka232 29 днів тому

      ​@@noke258OMG 😱

    • @boiscooka232
      @boiscooka232 29 днів тому

      ​@@noke258I don't know British GDP per Capita is 100k 😮 because China GDP per Capita now 13k

    • @willeisinga2089
      @willeisinga2089 29 днів тому +2

      @@noke258 UK gdp per capita. Now comes the difference. Capita UK is 66 million. Capita China is 1400 million. Makes UK very Small. UK is 240.000 square km. China is 9.600.000 square km. Makes again UK very small.

    • @rwjh3698
      @rwjh3698 29 днів тому +2

      ​@@noke258 Nah, the GDP per capita PPP that reflects real price is 3X

  • @Dungshoveleux
    @Dungshoveleux Місяць тому +109

    China has greater economies of scale and less regulation. They have all that cheap Russian energy we refused to buy.

    • @kierano8390
      @kierano8390 Місяць тому +2

      of course, why would we buy it and fund the russian war against ukraine? jesus, think and breath at the same time please

    • @Dungshoveleux
      @Dungshoveleux Місяць тому

      Because its none of our business ​@@kierano8390

    • @Dungshoveleux
      @Dungshoveleux Місяць тому +32

      ​@@kierano8390So in order to support our own governments foreign policy, we destroy our own economy. What was that about thinking and breathing? Cutting off your nose to spite your face?

    • @kierano8390
      @kierano8390 Місяць тому +2

      @@Dungshoveleux policy* and sorry i dont speak to russian bots

    • @ShadowPhoenixMaximus
      @ShadowPhoenixMaximus Місяць тому

      Translation: We produce a lot of unregulated crap that not even Chinese people want to buy (because they know its unsafe) and then the CCP tries to export it. We also get cheap Russian oil, but we don't have the infrastructure required to make any meaningful use of it - instead we have to rely on oversea imports and more coal factories than the rest of the world combined.

  • @marcs5117
    @marcs5117 Місяць тому +49

    Dont see anything wrong.

  • @bobdoe38
    @bobdoe38 Місяць тому +22

    Because the Chinese are smarter and they work harder 😂

  • @HighDef69
    @HighDef69 29 днів тому +10

    Dude said “It’s not an even playing field”. Really!? Chinese Government working for its people whilst the USA Government working for the 1%. Everything is “For Profit”. FYI - the USA Government gives billions of Grants each year to Pharmaceutical Companies who then create medicines and then sell it at exorbitant prices. Capitalism gone mad. We need a correction.

  • @you6338
    @you6338 29 днів тому +12

    Its simple.China is subsidizing companies ,west is subsidizing wars and proxy wars😂😂

  • @michaelchua3942
    @michaelchua3942 29 днів тому +14

    Why not western govts do the same? Illuminate me pls. Thanks

    • @anon.6678
      @anon.6678 23 дні тому

      They're trying - the Inflation Reduction Act for example - but Western political systems are inferior to the Chinese political system in some key aspects (definitely not all).

  • @mhz90718
    @mhz90718 29 днів тому +13

    Is there a chart for weapon manufacturing?

  • @badbadbadcat
    @badbadbadcat 29 днів тому +17

    In the US, IRA (Inflation Reduction Act) is giving away $2 trillion as subsidies

  • @jogo798
    @jogo798 Місяць тому +30

    1. Industrial policy
    2. Large no of stem grad
    3. Economy of scale

  • @stephanmbenti2855
    @stephanmbenti2855 Місяць тому +26

    This shows that power is not in military but your economy. The UK is bleeding money in military and defence instead of investing on it economy 🤦🏽‍♂️

    • @BatCountryAdventures
      @BatCountryAdventures 29 днів тому +5

      And the scary thing is that the military and defence is struggling even after billions were dump on them.
      It wouldn't surprise me one bit if China is posturing with Taiwan and South China Sea to slow drain the coffers of AUKUS. Proportionally, it's an incredible amount of money for AUKUS to spend on "Freedom of Navigation" missions so far away from home.

    • @stephanmbenti2855
      @stephanmbenti2855 29 днів тому

      @@BatCountryAdventures oh wow that’s a great point. I didn’t look at it from that angle.
      Hmm that could be true. If that so then it’s brilliant let the west waste their money on military whilst the Chinese go ahead and conquer the world without firing a single shot. They are playing Go whilst we in the west are playing chess.

    • @binghong9813
      @binghong9813 29 днів тому

      ​@@BatCountryAdventures. The US has a ring of military bases facing China, from Korea/Japan to the north to the Philippines in the south. And now they are talking about war with China. China wants trade around the world. America wants war, all fueled by its MIC

  • @tompell3032
    @tompell3032 29 днів тому +16

    why? because they worked their assoff, and they are smart.

    • @brianliew5901
      @brianliew5901 29 днів тому +2

      Don't say that they're smarter 'cuz Uncle Sam doesn't like it so just say the Chinese are lucky. 😂😂😂😂

  • @ze9947
    @ze9947 Місяць тому +27

    Today, the Western world should appreciate the Chinese government's consistent promotion of peace. With the Chinese government holding the largest industrial capacity in human history, once this capacity transforms into military strength, the West will witness unimaginable military figures, with all equipment counted in millions.

    • @nicholasdewhirst-kl1eq
      @nicholasdewhirst-kl1eq 28 днів тому

      The government is not promoting any peace in the South China Sea where they illegally occupy large swaths of the ocean.

  • @johnwe4431
    @johnwe4431 29 днів тому +6

    Chinese are smart and hard working people, they never leave the center of the world for thousands of years.

    • @binghong9813
      @binghong9813 29 днів тому

      China and India dominated the world economy before the west started their intrusion into the two countries and destroyed their lives. Now that China has got back its own footing the west cry foul.

  • @kaizen960
    @kaizen960 Місяць тому +12

    How about the Chips Act in the us?

  • @mikejohn2999
    @mikejohn2999 29 днів тому +12

    Chinese government are always very strategic and are not dummies

  • @ghteo9766
    @ghteo9766 Місяць тому +22

    1, their technologies have broke through, which make their products with reasonable quality. 2, they have cheaper label, cheaper materials, cheaper logistics, cheaper energy. it turns their cost much lower than their competitors. So, they dominate.

  • @marcionphilologos5367
    @marcionphilologos5367 Місяць тому +22

    The grafics show that STATE AID IS MINIMAL IN CHINA. THE WEST KEEPS BORROWING RATES EXTREMELY LOW AND CHINA GIVES FACTORIES LOANS WITH REDUCED RATES (STIIL HIGHER AS IN THE WEST). So, the conclusion is that CHINESE PEOPLE are better fit for capitalism, working, socialism, as Westerners are egocentric and want to become rich in the easy way.

  • @nmew6926
    @nmew6926 29 днів тому +9

    What about US dollar printing machines

  • @kelvinking4022
    @kelvinking4022 29 днів тому +6

    No wars, cheap energy Europe refused, economy of scale, better infrastructure facilatates transportation etc

  • @huanghermann5207
    @huanghermann5207 Місяць тому +13

    I don't think that government support is the most important factor. If it is, it will be easy for its competitors to copy. Besides where can the Chinese government got so much money to subsidise its industries?

    • @FabioCapela
      @FabioCapela 29 днів тому +3

      By spending 3.5% of GDP on subsidies instead of wasting it on its military like the US does.

  • @txmao
    @txmao 29 днів тому +8

    US had industry overcapacity and it led to 1929 Great Depression. To keep the industry capacity , US supplied Japan’s war machine during its invasion to China until Japan embargo all the imports into China including US supplies which stopped US supplying to Japan’s war machine and triggered pearl harbor attacks. Now, let’s see where Russian war machine goes with the unlimited supply from China.

  • @Great515
    @Great515 Місяць тому +13

    China bisa semaju sekarang ini karena tidak ikut campur masalah negara lain, China fokus mengurusi diri nya sendiri, fokus mengembangkan potensi ekonomi dan teknologi nya, saya rasa negara barat harus belajar banyak dari kemajuan China saat ini.

    • @arik2216
      @arik2216 18 днів тому

      Bukan. Tapi sistem pemerintah yang efisien yaitu hanya satu partai dengan otorisasi yg kuat untuk bekerja membangun negara. Barat menyebutnya otoriter, totaliter, ccp namun semuanya karena bentuk iri dari kemajuan China yg efisien dibandingkan suara demokrasi yg terlalu banyak kepentingan dan berisik.
      Tapi ingat dibalik kemajuan china ada banyak hal yg menjadi isu sosial baru. Yaitu tingkat kelahiran rendah, kehilangan identitas budaya, generasi muda yg kehilangan arah untuk berkeluarga karena gak ada lapangan perkerjaan digantikan ai dan automitasi.

  • @goolooggg9005
    @goolooggg9005 Місяць тому +8

    China have come so far, give them credit.
    Back in the 90s, made in China products already selling in Australia...

  • @subasthapa4839
    @subasthapa4839 29 днів тому +9

    I don't see anything wrong here, please help me

  • @wynetsang
    @wynetsang 29 днів тому +7

    Science and Civilisation in China (1954-present) is an ongoing series of books about the history of science and technology in China published by Cambridge University Press. It was initiated and edited by British historian Joseph Needham (1900-1995). China has several thousand years of tech experience while the West only has several hundred years since the Dark Age.

  • @samanthajones4877
    @samanthajones4877 29 днів тому +6

    Why doesn’t any western countries complain about the US’s dominating in weapons manufacturing?

    • @herrwolf5184
      @herrwolf5184 28 днів тому +2

      They should call it weapons overcapacity.

  • @luihinwai1
    @luihinwai1 Місяць тому +16

    This technique is called micro-managing the macro free market. The government sets an industrial direction of what area to invest in, make credit cheap in those areas, and allow the free market to compete in this area. This is better than direct subsidy because there is still a risk to be taken even with free credit, it's just the risk is lowered. This is like a farmer deciding where to point the water at to decide which crop to grow.

    • @WalkOverHotCoal
      @WalkOverHotCoal 29 днів тому +1

      I second that. But I would also suggest that it is intelligent farming.

  • @freddieventura4382
    @freddieventura4382 Місяць тому +19

    State driven market economy for the win. New paradigm while neoliberal market economies are stagnatinf

  • @OnMy1s
    @OnMy1s Місяць тому +24

    Cos all the manufacturing was shut down years ago and gifted to china every thing made in china whats with all the redundent questions lol

    • @ShadowPhoenixMaximus
      @ShadowPhoenixMaximus Місяць тому

      It is slowly being shifted away from China and into other South-East Asian countries like India and Vietnam. The problem was that the West thought they could change China by exposing it to Western markets, but they didn't count on the level of control the CCP would place on its citizens.

    • @BatCountryAdventures
      @BatCountryAdventures 29 днів тому

      "Gifted"? I think the Chinese work very hard to get to where they are now. That's like saying Apple if successful because they were gifted revenues.
      This kind of "saviour" mentality is literally what's corrupting the West World.

  • @Jamie-nt3eh
    @Jamie-nt3eh Місяць тому +13

    uk government focus on getting re-elected by making noises with headlines like "stop the boat", "reduce nhs waiting times", "half inflation", etc when knowing full well that can't do what they promise because so much control has been given away.

  • @ItsJefin
    @ItsJefin 29 днів тому +7

    Nothing wrong with this

  • @gokulvaradan8781
    @gokulvaradan8781 28 днів тому +3

    And in spite of that their government isnt crippled by debt. Maybe these rich OECD countries should fix their priorities if they want to compete.

  • @Peter-ox8lj
    @Peter-ox8lj Місяць тому +11

    because we are too busy being racist without knowing it

  • @joshau2346
    @joshau2346 26 днів тому +3

    Simple. China invests money in its infrastructures, US invests money into its tanks and missles.

  • @oscartur3747
    @oscartur3747 Місяць тому +5

    Those numbers about gov aid are per capita or in total?

  • @glenndouglas.T
    @glenndouglas.T Місяць тому +6

    Make hay while the sun shines - because it will eventually rain. Nothing lasts forever.

  • @redtree2242
    @redtree2242 29 днів тому +4

    China has the biggest population its very normal to become a big manufacturer.

  • @user-uz5df3ky2m
    @user-uz5df3ky2m Місяць тому +15

    And where are the mines located to produce the materials. Is uk government going to let companies dig the country up to mine the materials in our backyards

  • @andrewgreen5892
    @andrewgreen5892 Місяць тому +6

    Well if it isn't the inevitable consequence of decades of neoliberal stagnation

  • @TheKkpop1
    @TheKkpop1 Місяць тому +4

    Can blame China which is the world largest manufacturing hub.

  • @Milanesium
    @Milanesium 29 днів тому +3

    I always thought labor is more expensive in OECD countries.

  • @pleongv1
    @pleongv1 28 днів тому +3

    What is wrong with state aid .. USA aided military equipment industry

  • @yeejlilys9742
    @yeejlilys9742 Місяць тому +4

    British? British Empire is no gone.

  • @ysbh228
    @ysbh228 28 днів тому +3

    西方國家向來都認為中國的數字造假,不可信,選擇繼續抹黑,妖化中國,并陶醉在過去的光環中。殊不知,中國人的毅力是堅韌耐磨的,外部壓力越大就越鋼強,堅信眾志成城。西方國家對中國重返世界舞台,適應不良。只怪他們自大,不屑中國歷史文化! 過去40年,中國積累人才多様,他們不靠社會救濟金,靠著✋刻苦勤奮,積累財富。他們的使命,除了為家人創造幸福,同時也為民族雪恥,更為中華民族偉大復興作貢獻!👍👍👍

  • @Justone-vl7ji
    @Justone-vl7ji Місяць тому +7

    West not having it

  • @monarchnoo8561
    @monarchnoo8561 Місяць тому +4

    well great, all gov should support their local industries and jobs... what's new? where's the news?

  • @255kessy5
    @255kessy5 Місяць тому +7

    What about production per population?

  • @michaelkoh2280
    @michaelkoh2280 29 днів тому +2

    Everyone subsidises and what wrong with that? Go ahead everyone, go ahead and also subsidize.

  • @BslmUSA
    @BslmUSA Місяць тому +8

    Devils numbers , misleading! Where does money come from? Printing it?

  • @WalkOverHotCoal
    @WalkOverHotCoal 29 днів тому +2

    It would be really helpful if a similar tea leave reading is done on the wastefulness of weapons systems and wars, Sure, China is helping "meaningful" activities such as industrial manufacturing, but that is being productive as opposed to the futile act of helping the US to fight losing wars. Can Sky News find out why the UK is at the back of the industry productivity queue, while it is right at the forefront when it comes to being a soldier boy?

  • @05nautilus
    @05nautilus Місяць тому +5

    They have smart decent working cheap labor

  • @MS113MS
    @MS113MS 29 днів тому +2

    It was never an even playing field for China when China was poor anyway.

  • @teoweingee6142
    @teoweingee6142 Місяць тому +11

    State would have gone bankrupt long ago if it subsides so many business & industries. Must be joking 😁

    • @FabioCapela
      @FabioCapela 29 днів тому +1

      It's called industrial policy. China does offer subsidies and support to that many businesses and industries - but at a level that won't bankrupt it.
      As I said in another post, China just chooses to spend on subsidies what the US spends on its military as a percentage of GDP. Which is a much better way of spending that money.

  • @wildandbarefoot
    @wildandbarefoot Місяць тому +6

    A planned economy is beyter than free market, obviously.
    Ideology rules politically and were stuck in a loop.

    • @ShadowPhoenixMaximus
      @ShadowPhoenixMaximus Місяць тому

      It isn't. Our democratic system in the West may not be perfect, but it does deliver results.
      The CCP says much, but does little. We're talking about a "long term" "by the science" system of governance that has more coal factories than the rest of the world combined, despite being the leading manufacture of green technology. This is also the country that has some of the worst air, water and land pollution on the planet.
      They were also lying to the public about the origins to the virus (essentially saying its anywhere but not China) to the extent that it caused mass panic (people were literally throwing their pets out of windows out of fear they could be covid carriers) and racism against non-Chinese.
      A lot of "leading" Chinese technology is derived from Western technology which was stolen by agents working on behalf of the CCP.

  • @123_1
    @123_1 29 днів тому +2

    State subsidized Chinese companies destroy competitors with artificially low prices, then raise price when no competiotors left

    • @garysetiadi366
      @garysetiadi366 28 днів тому +1

      😱 they have already destroyed all competitors. When are they going to raise prices?

    • @123_1
      @123_1 27 днів тому

      @@garysetiadi366Fortunatelly, not yet!

  • @daadirabbi
    @daadirabbi 29 днів тому +1

    Certainly, China supports businesses that contribute to societal well-being and job creation. This approach aligns with the principles of socialism, whereas the Western approach tends to favor a select group of wealthy individuals.

  • @kitcarpo4745
    @kitcarpo4745 Місяць тому +1

    I question the data in the charts although mostly accurate to point. Did he look at capacity?

  • @Hifeh1
    @Hifeh1 28 днів тому +1

    Where is India in all these? Similar to China in population, land mass and geography.

  • @eclipse680605
    @eclipse680605 27 днів тому +2

    Focus is what they do..

  • @OdongoFredrick
    @OdongoFredrick 21 день тому +1

    In Africa it was hard to have smartphone, like poor people but China helped us and we can get everything at lw price

  • @vicentevaldez1696
    @vicentevaldez1696 29 днів тому +1

    They own the supply line ...simple

  • @Fightback2023
    @Fightback2023 29 днів тому +2

    People should youtube a video about "American vs China" rap... it's coming true in all sectors.

  • @Justmyopinionlol
    @Justmyopinionlol 28 днів тому +1

    European dominance is an anomaly in world history.

  • @kenbehrens5778
    @kenbehrens5778 11 днів тому

    I remember the US government bailing out the banks in the GFC. Australia and other countries provided State support to businesses during Covid. It is not surprising that governments do that. The US currently gives financial incentives for green production in the US (almost $1 Trillion) in support. What seems to be the problem with China doing similar?

  • @gandaasolomon6140
    @gandaasolomon6140 29 днів тому +1

    What do the other governments use their monies for.
    China supports its own...
    What about the others..

  • @BatCountryAdventures
    @BatCountryAdventures 10 днів тому

    People in Britain really should be asking why the British government isn't doing the same thing. In fact, since it's a democracy, the Brits should be DEMANDING better!
    Why were the bankers bailed out in 2008?
    Why were so much spaffed away during the 20 years in Afghanistan?
    Years of austerity!
    The Royal weddings and funeral!
    Hotels rented out to house migrants!
    The list goes on and on and the good British people don't deserve this!

  • @jackjhmc820
    @jackjhmc820 28 днів тому

    Chinese urbanisation required HUGE amounts of steel and cement. it was already like this in 2006, let alone 2024.

  • @xgguo3531
    @xgguo3531 22 дні тому

    If comparing financial sector or military weapon sector, US , UK should be in much better position than manuafactering.

  • @musafawundu6718
    @musafawundu6718 24 дні тому

    That is called the state performing its duties and responsibilities and being regarded as the prime actual driver of the economy. People have been sold the neo liberal nonsense of laissez fairisim and the state just merely providing the enabling environment, when even in the West it does much more than that, even though much less than is the case of China. The state and the government are not demonized in China as they are in the UK and US, and especially the latter. In mainland Europe, the state isn't demonized either.

  • @nickolasbochkarev9624
    @nickolasbochkarev9624 Місяць тому +1

    They would probably still dominate without those subsidies because they are productive people. Those subsidies are often go to the least productive government linked sectors and subsidies do not come at not cost and come back to burden business in other ways such as taxes on workers, imports, etc. People often talk about how the chinese government does so much to help its business sector and how its unfair, I think that chinses business would even be more competitive if the government got out of the way.

  • @edheng01able
    @edheng01able 26 днів тому

    then other countries can also provide aid to their manufacturers? Why do they complain instead of doing that?

  • @MohammadMustafaBaghaei
    @MohammadMustafaBaghaei 29 днів тому +1

    Bring on the tariffs and qoutas now!!

  • @UltraPerception
    @UltraPerception Місяць тому +1

    Because it is the Lush environments and less restrictions on peoples ability to secure themselves.
    So once secure money collected can be spent more wisely.
    Here there is always been long historical struggle to secure oneself food water and shelter
    are in the way.
    Not so much in China.
    Sol then the population flower as it were
    into capable inventors, researchers and manufactures.

  • @UltraPerception
    @UltraPerception Місяць тому +1

    Tends to be bafflement for the yr generations because of their Credit card opportunity, unqualified jobs, low competition and cheaper housing

  • @tondematongo32
    @tondematongo32 26 днів тому

    The secret is simple: "mind your own business"

  • @TheKatiokung
    @TheKatiokung Місяць тому

    Who is holding the 2nd industry lv., Nëw Sövïët: Hello

  • @noorijanze
    @noorijanze 22 дні тому

    Everyone does that so it's beneficial for their people

  • @shencheanglow3726
    @shencheanglow3726 27 днів тому

    Nobody stop anyone from subsidizing one's key industries. It is up to each country to focus on what they do best, to benefit everyone and the environment. I will blame china if they subsidize their luxurious products instead of solar panel, battery, EV, wind farms. It seemed UK and many other sleep in their cosy sofa for too long.
    By the way, India with the same 1.4 billion population will be next to overwhelm the world market if the west continue to waste time in blaming other, instead of getting up to produce something good for everyone.

  • @seanlcs
    @seanlcs 28 днів тому

    At 2:06, the chart shows almost 66% of the aid is below market rate borrowing. which means the companies need to repay and the lender earn less profit. Win-win less. To me it is a good strategy. Isn't it a good thing also when your government spends tax-payer money on tax and grant to help tax-payers?

  • @aungaisum8654
    @aungaisum8654 26 днів тому

    Because they are very intelligent.

  • @xgguo3531
    @xgguo3531 22 дні тому

    China government provides support for its companies and builds up competitive strength global wide.
    Is it what government supposed to do , and do better?
    UK , or US cannnot copy what China government did , because China has different system, for example, major China banks are state owned.

  • @anthonydawson9700
    @anthonydawson9700 28 днів тому

    Per capita would be more interesting however I think it might still be the same

    • @musafawundu6718
      @musafawundu6718 24 дні тому

      Per capita China is far more in the production of all those goods than any Western country listed...

  • @waynegardner2495
    @waynegardner2495 29 днів тому +1

    It’s because we choose to give it all away to cheap labour

  • @chris_20048
    @chris_20048 Місяць тому +4

    Indeed china is soo dominant 😮

  • @user-tl4ly1fk2p
    @user-tl4ly1fk2p 29 днів тому +2

    Good , west cant expect to be lord forever

  • @Kevin-kd6hf
    @Kevin-kd6hf 4 дні тому

    is that your analysis? really? go back to primary school