As long as you know how to solve a 4x4, using basic logic, you can solve a 50x50, it'll just take multiple days if done straight. Look up a solve of the 33x33, which is currently the largest order cube in the world.
This is absolutely mesmerizing, and even though the way the ai is done is inefficient, I enjoyed it simply for the sake that you actually taught the A.I. how to solve it like a human being. Bravo good sir. Your work is simultaneously hilariously jank and overall impressive at the same time.
I couldn't agree more with you on this, I'm so glad that as stated in the title an artificial intelligence was trained to solve a gigantic rubiks cube, despite how one could simply implement an algorithm that solves rubiks cubes, I'm glad he didn't click bait with the title and went the extra mile to create an ai!
@@alternatingf42Neural network =/= AI. This is still an AI by the literal definition of the word that I was taught in my college AI class, even though it isn't a neural network
@@memediatek This video was not created before AI meant neural network to most people. Just because ChatGPT wasn't out doesn't mean we weren't doing this. Neural networks (and large language models, it's just that ChatGPT wasn't out) hit mainstream popularity in 2016, and the AI revolution where people started using deep learning started way back in 2012. EDIT: There was deep learning before this, but 2012 is when it took off in academia, and by 2016 everyone who wanted to train a neural network was doing it. Tensorflow released in 2015.
@@A_Bl4nk As much as r/woosh is a dead horse that has been beat repeatedly until it's entire body mass has turned into a gelatinous sludge, I do have to thank you for putting some thought into this one. It has improved the quality of woosh by 0.005%
Kinda offended by this comment, there are people that learn from tutorials that teach green and others red and a lot white but how does it even matter, a cross is a cross. Guys it's not that difficult to be colour neutral and the benefits are worth it.
That joke does not work. He knows how to solve a 55x55x55 because he explained the steps to solving it in the video and implemented the procedure in his code.
You ArE ONe StUpId MAN,, HoW Do yOU THiNk A 1 By 1 bY 1 cUbE wILl WoRK??!? It WiLL aLReaDy Be sOlVEd BeCaUsE THErE aRe No EdGes AnD CoRNeRs ?!? ArE YoU PERhaPs SoMeKinD oF IdIoT?!??! I aM A LEVeL 14 RUbIks WIzaRd , I HavE SolVed ThE CubEs FoR oVeR 27 YEArS NoW YoU PeAsANt. EaT a ShOe AnD DonT BOthEr pEoplE wIth A HiGhEr iQ ThAn 129 ., GoOdByE Edit: A lot of people didn’t understand that this was a joke too. I wOUldNt Be TyPinG LiKe ThIS if it weren’t a joke Also ua-cam.com/video/LVvUOI77EFs/v-deo.html
Have you heard about hypercubes? They're like Rubik's Cubes, but in more than three dimensions. It might be fun (for us) to watch you tackle solving those.
We're talking about solving, maybe, a 3x3x3x3 tesseract, a "cube" in four spatial dimensions. But, now, coming to think of it, would the 4x4x4x4 Rubik's tesseract the canonical object be?@@dragonseatcheese8727
"You can't just tell the AI to fiddle around until it figures it out" *A few months later* "This AI learned to drive cause I told it to fiddle around until car go broom broom"
Dude, didn't know the screen was doing freakin rubics cube while loading, dang now I understand why my ohone doesn't load. I guess it's kinda dumb and just gave up on solving the cube😂
interesting that you do green cross first. I don’t think it actually matters which color you choose but it’s still interesting to me cuz I’m used to doing white cross
This really reminded me of old school watching a defrag. Slowly mesmerizing yet totally incomprehensible what is actually happening. Also how many moves was the scramble, and how many was solve? 'cos I guess that would be the interesting numbers, if you don't mind.
55x55 solving process Green face (center): 11:10 Blue face ( center): 12:33 Red face(center): 13:09 Yellow face(center): 13:39 White face(center) 14:30 Edges: 15:36 Solved: 15:23
That is exactly what he did, (but he didn't program the computer to merely reverse the moves he converted algorithms used by humans to a form the computer could execute).
@@martiddy It's always been something in the back of my mind as a fun little project, but there are already a few Tetris AIs on UA-cam, the main thing holding me back is just wondering what would make mine unique and therefore worth doing. Any ideas?
There will probably be a problem with that, since it's very hard to decide how far away from a solved cube the AI got on its turn. The other option of optimizing for speed is incredibly time consuming, with the first generation needing someone to solve the cube with ONLY RANDOM MOVES. A rubriks cube just needs way too much foresight for a neural network to find the algorithms on its own.
@@s.soderqvist3501 It might works if you first try to let it learn each small step of some algorithm, and once it learns that algorith, let it improve from there on it's own.
I’d definitely like to see a neural network attack this. Maybe if you gave each ‘step’ x moves to then decide if it was getting closer. (In other words don’t try to evaluate if the cube is more or less solved until you’ve done 3 (or some other number of) moves)
@@naso4265 ah! the nostalgia homie! I've never met anyone who looks into a disk that is being defragged and says that's interesting, in fact, most people defrag disk when they can go off the screen because it is annoying and boring to watch and wait.
I remember seeing the 1000x1000x1000 solve a long time ago but I was too young to know what algorithms or reverse scrambles were. Really cool that you spent 40 hours programming a legitimate NxNxN Rubik's cube solver.
I believe its just as easy to do that as normal. You just have to recode what a solved cube looks like and reassign the nerd values to the makemesoundsmart squares in the configuration of what the art look like.
@@alexvisan7622 It doesn't have to be, just look at some of the fastest machine cube solvers, they do a very efficient method and calculate it in a time that is extremely fast if you compare it to this
@@cofromdiscord118 Near optimal algorithms are very fast, but only solve the cube in 22-23 moves. Most cubes can be solved in 18 moves or less though, and some very slow algorithms are dedicated to solving cubes in the shortest number of moves, guarenteed.
@@cofromdiscord118 you could bruteforce the cube until you get the required pattern. So,while following the steps (white cross etc) you would get optimal transitions between the steps
I believe some people at google already tried this, and I don't know how successful they were, but you definitely need a supercomputer to even attempt it.
The most successful algorithms would be using only the “next block” preview window to inform their move decision above a certain speed. It could make for an interesting project.
Without loosing what? Seriously though it’s actually kind of interesting the algorithms that were designed to not lose at Tetris in that one of them I saw would pause the game when it was about to lose and never unpause it.
@@kriegenjoyer6913 sort of.. like nobody cares about some donkey kong trash or his 16th revisit to AI learning to walk.. I mean when he actually made *content* it was so good. I wish he'd come back and make some more. I miss him.
Imagine being stuck in an empty room and being told you can't leave until you solve 50x50x50 Rubik's Cube
Thats scary
As long as you know how to solve a 4x4, using basic logic, you can solve a 50x50, it'll just take multiple days if done straight.
Look up a solve of the 33x33, which is currently the largest order cube in the world.
I can’t even solve a 3x3 lol
I’d say something along the lines of
“IMMM SORRY!!!?” On a loudspeaker
*- Anxiety noises -*
I love how the scrambled cube looks like my Lego house as a kid
IKR I LITERALLY THOUGHT THE SAME THING 😂
I never had normal legos
The legos I grew up with were either the girly legos or halo legos
And I chose halo legos!
You know that this video was made 1 year ago nobody is gonna see it dumbass
@@xenithx2958 apparently 190 peeps have seen it.
@@diamondtk287 dood I had both, I loved building multicoloured bunkers and vehicles for my Halo minis
"we do smart stuff in the stupidest way possible" You should trademark that
lmol
A dually I think we do dumb things in the worst way
I would like. But it’s at 666 likes
Stolen
liʊm YeEEeeSSssssSs
This is absolutely mesmerizing, and even though the way the ai is done is inefficient, I enjoyed it simply for the sake that you actually taught the A.I. how to solve it like a human being. Bravo good sir. Your work is simultaneously hilariously jank and overall impressive at the same time.
I couldn't agree more with you on this, I'm so glad that as stated in the title an artificial intelligence was trained to solve a gigantic rubiks cube, despite how one could simply implement an algorithm that solves rubiks cubes, I'm glad he didn't click bait with the title and went the extra mile to create an ai!
@@alternatingf42Neural network =/= AI. This is still an AI by the literal definition of the word that I was taught in my college AI class, even though it isn't a neural network
@@alternatingf42maam this video was created before ai meant we jammed a llm into your start menu
@@memediatek This video was not created before AI meant neural network to most people. Just because ChatGPT wasn't out doesn't mean we weren't doing this. Neural networks (and large language models, it's just that ChatGPT wasn't out) hit mainstream popularity in 2016, and the AI revolution where people started using deep learning started way back in 2012.
EDIT: There was deep learning before this, but 2012 is when it took off in academia, and by 2016 everyone who wanted to train a neural network was doing it. Tensorflow released in 2015.
@@CalebTerryRED No... it's not. No offense to whatever college you went to. This is just a computer program.
"The first step is to solve the green cross"
Wait... the GREEN cross?
Yeah, had the same reaction
It hurt my soul a little bit
*Angry noises*
I had a cube that came with instructions, so I learned to solve beginning with the green cross
Any one else solve the white corse and not the green cros
"Alright too easy..!" "Aaaand it's fucked." Me when I try and do anything
Same
That's my mom's name lol
#relatable
Y - S ame
Me when I put a computer together for the first time.
"I did try a 1000 x 1000 but my computer had a Stroke"
damn u lmao
Warlock I just r/wooshed the r/woosher that r/wooshed the r/wooshed
Ar Nas No one cares.
Ar Nas ok lol
@@A_Bl4nk As much as r/woosh is a dead horse that has been beat repeatedly until it's entire body mass has turned into a gelatinous sludge, I do have to thank you for putting some thought into this one. It has improved the quality of woosh by 0.005%
Pretty sure his computer said that too
Hats off bro , you really deserve it
Claps for the level of coding involved
I can Solve That With Paint in 1 minute
You want a cookie einstein?
iSkyro -X r/woooosh
@@gabegamearcade5353 double r/woosh
@Lucas L Quad r/woosh you thought it was fake
wow your so original
"man complains a video doesn't have good resolution, spends 40 hours writing code to make it himself"
Be the 1080p60 pixel change you want to see in the world
Start every video with "this is code bullet, where we do smart stuff in the dumbest way posible."
That's a good intro
Yes. I vote yes.
PLEASE
That should be on a shirt
"we do smart stuff in the dumbest way possible"
-Code Bullet
yea!!!
code bullet: I don't make a habit of copying other people
The rest of his channel: Hi
Me: hey! im a pretty good programmer, ima do something like that.
My computer: *don't*
Imagine using a potato computer
This post was made by potato laptop gang
Intel HD gang
lol
Softly
killing me
I love how 16 million people sat through this to see a giant rubix cube get solved, that's an extra lvl of procrastination
Why are you calling me out like that
why dont you MIND YO DAMN BUSINESS lmao
@@-mako-6018 okay, damn, I mean, I'm one of them people soo
@@loggingfire1 same bruther/ma'am
shhh-
"'You just have to try not to fuck up the shit you've already done"
Sun Tzu, The Art Of War
Great words but not the stupid peoples last words: “I mean it’s rat poison not human poison right”
I saw "sun tzu, art of war" and thought of techno
@@Reeces_piece same
that's every day of my life
@@Reeces_piece saw?
"green cross"
literally every cuber in existence is killing themselves at this monstrosity you shared upon this world
how
Why why why it white cross lol
Yea, normally either white or most solved(color neutral)
Kinda offended by this comment, there are people that learn from tutorials that teach green and others red and a lot white but how does it even matter, a cross is a cross. Guys it's not that difficult to be colour neutral and the benefits are worth it.
@@iusegnulinuxbtw this guy really talking like this is as bad as racism
Ah yes, the epileptic seizure method my favorite way to solve a cube.
Lol
Lmao
*SEIZURE PROCEDURE!!*
2x speed activated
Lol
The last cube isn't solving... it's RENDERING. ;.;
no need for for lying codde bullet never do that
minecraft Başkut get the joke
Hahaha yes, being a 3d modeler, I found it awfully similar to rendering.
Omg, that is so tru XD, love your channel by the way, and code bullets.
More like... it's solving... but not rendering ;.;
This is the most aggressive way someone has ever shoved interesting content down my throat
and the best
Lol
Welcome to code bullet content
Interesting ...
@@saddestdrag0n842 i think his best creation was the one were you could make Donald trump run for his life from a death lazer
plot twist: he can't code and he just spent months learning how to solve a 55 x 55
That joke does not work. He knows how to solve a 55x55x55 because he explained the steps to solving it in the video and implemented the procedure in his code.
where’s the godly 1x1x1?
You ArE ONe StUpId MAN,, HoW Do yOU THiNk A 1 By 1 bY 1 cUbE wILl WoRK??!? It WiLL aLReaDy Be sOlVEd BeCaUsE THErE aRe No EdGes AnD CoRNeRs ?!? ArE YoU PERhaPs SoMeKinD oF IdIoT?!??! I aM A LEVeL 14 RUbIks WIzaRd , I HavE SolVed ThE CubEs FoR oVeR 27 YEArS NoW YoU PeAsANt. EaT a ShOe AnD DonT BOthEr pEoplE wIth A HiGhEr iQ ThAn 129 ., GoOdByE
Edit:
A lot of people didn’t understand that this was a joke too. I wOUldNt Be TyPinG LiKe ThIS if it weren’t a joke
Also
ua-cam.com/video/LVvUOI77EFs/v-deo.html
plox best comment ever
His computer couldn't handle the god cube xD and watching someone solve the 1x1x1 is always funny
@@crowokatagi4547 lol
@@ploxman just some emo kid
Cubers: Alright a cube video!
CodeBullet: Solves using the Green Cross
Cubers: Oh no, that's not okay
Dylan Ford me exactly lol I solve the white side
Guys, solving green cross is okay. You should be color neutral :)
Dylan Ford it's ok for me since I’m color neutral lol
@@kaktus2514 yeah don't be a colorphobe
@@matacoyo white is all colors together, can you be colorphobe when you hate basically nothing ?
*just take the stickers off and put them back on*
Lol
But it appears to be a stickerless cube
*_w o w_*
Ack
But why it it's a effortless cube? (Illusion 100)
I’m a huge fan of this guy, Rubik’s cubes, and algorithms. It’s like this video was plucked from my dreams
"Welcome to Code Bullet where we do smart stuff in the stupidest way possible."
Me: "MY PEOPLE!!!!"
Oh I just do stupidest stuff in the stupidest way possible
feline fox codx same
i don't do stuff
Daniel Smith finally, something that I can relate to
I do stupid stuff in the smartest way possible.
Me: I SOLVED THE 3x3! FINALLY
Code Bullet: *hold my keyboard*
(Bashes face at touchscreen computer and finish)
Code Bullet: Actually hand me that back I need that
I haven't even solved the 3x3 LOL!!!
I can’t even solve a 2x2
This shit is why skynet is going to turn us into more awful terminator movies
You know your in corona isolation when you spend 16 minutes watching AI solve a giant Rubix cuble
@chanel • 69 years ago lmao
The struggle is REAL my friend.
Hi I in future
You know you're in isolation when you watch every single codebullet video for 6th time.
Adushi
LIKE COMMENT SUBSCRIBE TO MY CHANNEL JFAM! ua-cam.com/channels/zntfc9wfPj2FZWSRCzALsQ.html
Dude this is by far my favorite coding channel thanks for the f---ing amazing work and vids!
This video does look like an actual solve; the other video looks so random. That other video really looks like a reverse-scramble.
the guy knew he'd be called out on it, too, probably
*"We do Smart stuff in the stupidest ways."*
This should be in every description at the end.
As the channel motto, if you will.
Sound like Aperture Science "Science isn't about why, It's about why not !"
That's what I do except its just the other way around
I read that just as he said it... wow.
Weird flex but ok
Still working on my 3x3 here...
BootlessDave same
I can solve mine 24 sec and above
im still trying to do my 1x1
Haven’t even tried to solve my 0x0, it’s too hard
I tried to think of doing a 0x0 but I cant think about rubix cubes.. it's smarter than me...and my head would blow up
I love how, when the orange and white faces get solved, the yellow looks like a scan line moving through the face, checking its state.
"We do smart stuff in the stupidest way possible."
That's by far the most accurate description of humanity that I've ever heard.
Humanity also does supid stuff in the smartest way possible
kingofgar101 that’s actually lot more accurate😂
you mustve forgotten to include twitter in the statistic, thats like 90% stupid stuff in the stupidest way possible
In the video: AI solving a 55x55x55 Rubik's cube!!
What I see: *A colorful cube twitching and twerking*
And glitching
@PlayerOneStudios No you see your computer screen i see my tablet screen
*mm sexy algorithms*
What
@Bahman Altamash but you used an emoji ur on a mobile device 😎
It's so satisfying just seeing the colour of the face it's making drain out of the other sides gradually
I thought you were talking about a human for a second.
@@AceTechn0 LOL
I love seeing the lines shutter in a row going down too
Have you heard about hypercubes? They're like Rubik's Cubes, but in more than three dimensions. It might be fun (for us) to watch you tackle solving those.
they’re a myth
There are 3 spatial and one temporal dimensions in our universe. How do you involve 4 dimensions into a 3 dimensional puzzle? That makes no sense.
We're talking about solving, maybe, a 3x3x3x3 tesseract, a "cube" in four spatial dimensions. But, now, coming to think of it, would the 4x4x4x4 Rubik's tesseract the canonical object be?@@dragonseatcheese8727
@@dragonseatcheese8727we solve the cube in the future and past too
What? No. A hypercube isn't a Rubik's Cube. A hypercube is a 4-dimensional version of a cube.
First, it solve the cube
Next, it'll solve the world's over population problem
Feminismo.
Hunger games
villager #2 if ur first how come there is 3 comments on top.
@@hexvitaminddeficiency9690 that is not what he means tho?
villager #2 .. ah shit
pfffffft....was I supposed to be impressed? I've successfully assembled IKEA furniture.
This is great
Tackz One how?
Praise the actual Jesus
Damn YOU LEGEND
Tackz One you know lying isn’t a god thing.
"Welcome to code bullet, wjere we do the smartest stuff in the dumbest way possible." I want this on a shirt
I'm with ya on this one. That would be awesome!
I'd buy that shirt
Only if it had the typo
Isn't that supposed to be the other way around? Doing the dumbest stuff in the smartest way possible.
Yeah
2:18 "Alright, too easy! Here we go! Yep, that's lookin' gre- And it's fucked."
My favourite quote ever
AI: solves 55 x 55 x 55
Me: How do I turn it again?
OptimalOptimus50 wait you don’t?
OptimalOptimus50 No shit
OptimalOptimus50 no shit Sherlock
OptimalOptimus50 no shit Sherlock Holmes
CinnamonRoll Haru you are stupid
“I basically shot myself in the foot with a cannon...”
-Code Bullet 2018
*with a cannon*
*In the foot*
Code: points gun at head instead of foot
Timestamp?
3:32
Rubik's cube world record holder: (Exists)
AI: *You're not the only one cursed with knowledge.*
Gawd, I love these memes
lol whats up zeref
But this… does put a smile on my face.
Felix... or has that changed lol
last I checked (for 3x3) the record was at 5.25 seconds, right?
Jacob Charo 3.5 seconds
How did I get this recommended in 2025 😅
Same
Same
Same
"You can't just tell the AI to fiddle around until it figures it out"
*A few months later*
"This AI learned to drive cause I told it to fiddle around until car go broom broom"
Sorry you did that wrong you ment boom boom
@@TheRocketTurtle bitch you can't spell
that youtube channel actually i think its vroom vroom
@@microbenggu Nah
ua-cam.com/video/ub0S3gajaj0/v-deo.html
But can it solve the *captcha I’m not a bot test?*
That's actually pretty hard to do
Way harder than figuring out the letters in normal capcha.
Just saying. Byyyyeeee
@@bsae54 shit.
Why tho?
@@bibuserafim4670 no idea, people just whoosh for no reason now
@@RubySapior there was an obvious reason, dont be dumb. The op was making a joke, but bibu clearly fell for it.
Cuz CB's head is a computer?
Petition to make this video a standard loading screen.
Mateusz Gajewski i vote for petition
You have my vote.
Yes
Signed by me
Yes
“We do smart stuff in the stupidest way possible”
Me: no that is Michal Reeves
this is just more software-focused Michael Reeves
The green side of the larger cube being solved was like a loading screen
shadow4f341 silver Thorn green layer*
@@joechristo2 its still a side lol
Dude, didn't know the screen was doing freakin rubics cube while loading, dang now I understand why my ohone doesn't load. I guess it's kinda dumb and just gave up on solving the cube😂
@@joechristo2 not layer, side. you only solve the center pieces, which only have one color, and you don't mess with the edges and corners.
I swear. "We do smart stuff in the stupidest way possible" is my new favorite quote.
I relate to it so well.
"We do smart stuff in the stupidest way possible."
That could be the motto for Australia as a whole. Emu war anyone?
Skitty It That was a stupid thing in the stupidest way possible
@@SirTell Yes it was "smart" to stop animals from eating farmland, but it was incredibley stupid to
1) Declare war on emus
2) Pretty much lose
@@SirTell why are you arguing about the emu war
ENDK Lightslayer oh shit gottem dude wow
@@SirTell What did you correct about me?
interesting that you do green cross first. I don’t think it actually matters which color you choose but it’s still interesting to me cuz I’m used to doing white cross
This really reminded me of old school watching a defrag. Slowly mesmerizing yet totally incomprehensible what is actually happening.
Also how many moves was the scramble, and how many was solve? 'cos I guess that would be the interesting numbers, if you don't mind.
Joe Parker Gotta love the ol defrag.
I GOT ALL THE UA-cam PINK PANTHER MOVIES AS RECOMMENDED.
@David MacRoberts youtube is glitching, i didnt mean to reply lol, i meant to click comment
Ausologics defrag is what you are looking for.
You know, now that big say that... I miss defragging my hard drive, just because I enjoyed watching that :P
AI learns to defeat captcha please!
Lol
It's impossible
Not an AI but close enough
ua-cam.com/video/fsF7enQY8uI/v-deo.html
@@faisalalnasri7762 Sorry to say that, but AI is already better at it than humans!
would be awesome
Mom: go to bed already
Me: *I must not sleep unless this AI finishes this cube of rubiks*
55x55 solving process
Green face (center): 11:10
Blue face ( center): 12:33
Red face(center): 13:09
Yellow face(center): 13:39
White face(center) 14:30
Edges: 15:36
Solved: 15:23
I wonder how many moves were required to solve the 15 side and 55 side cubes.
*plot twist: Code bullet is just good at solving rubiks cubes*
JUST TELL ME WHAT IS UR PROFILE PIC... i see it so often on so many accounts
@@pyketrick9848 After doing a reverse image search: it's a main character from Deus Ex (A pc game).
Karama a UA-camr told all his followers to change their pfp to it and go raiding
Karama maxmilluinmus’ picture
This is the most popular profile pic now😂
Every single non-cuber: *i JuSt PeEl ThE sTiCkErS oFf*
AI: How about no
every single cuber is like oh well you have to use the comutators and by the way your ai is stupid its uses the complete wrong alogorithm
and also most cubes dont have stickers anymore
@@unspecablecuber1244 exept rubix brands but rubix brand stupid
unspecable123 imagine making fun of people that don’t have the same hobby as you
@@flazerrazer2992 no i dont think rubix brand has stickers just tiles
Jokes on you, my internet is awful so this is at 144p.
Ouch...
MinusGix yeah it’s called Australian internet
Indian on 2g spotted
lol same except my maximum is 240
MinusGix relatable
The real hero is the computer handling that much
All i did was watching a rubik's cube glitching for 16 minutes
*16 minutes
Rubix*
@@blacker4404 it's rubik's
@@linggastratomen r/woooosh.
Lol.
@@blacker4404 it is Rubik's based from the one who invented it Erno Rubik
ur embarrassing urself
“I ain’t teaching you shit”
I like this guy. *subscribed
E N I G M A M A C H I N E P A R T 2
Too hard, turns out Alan Turing was a genius.
Ligma machine
@@Recabilly Turing*
@@Recabilly But nowadays we have way faster computers which could crack it easily with the right brute force.
@@sadhlife
Corrected, thank you
Code bullet: **screams**
The viewers: that’s why we love code bullet
Why didn't you just code it to peel off the stickers?
@@youhavefoundit then tear it apart and rebuild
Stickerless cubes just look better and less of a hassle in my opinion.
lucax tshotting ............
r/wooosh
Jeez kid, calm down. It's the internet, none of this matters.
@@Irrational34 you just wooshed your self. gg
let's be real for a second... what maniac starts with the green side?!
white side or yellow side is way better
Those that come from Dan Brown’s school of Cubes. What a classic UA-cam video. I Never learned other superior methods and I still solve green first
Ur mom
I got slightly triggered when he used green to make the cross, I've always started with white whenever I cube.
all colors are fine
People: *Doesn't care AI takeover*
Meanwhile
AI:
Lol...
Nice meanwhile...
This isn't AI
( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°) what do you mean
@@MidnightBloomDev i like how the title literally says "AI"
the fact that we have a 49x49 is insane, we are getting close to this irl
Bet it can't delete Internet history as quick as I can though.
RTSchofield Use incognito mode.
Pff, idiot.
Awesome Donut r/wooooosh
SolapureNZ Oh, don’t you woosh me, young man, I’ve been doing this for ages, it’s you who doesn’t understand my joke.
Plz don’t call me young man..
Also don’t call people idiots even if it’s “a joke”
@@SolapureNZ nice one lol
*Tell it to scramble then unscramble.*
Demonetized
Scramble and then unscramble
There you go i did it
can you monetize my cat
@@bruhsauce644 nah he can only demonetize
Rubik's cube, transform and roll out.
That is exactly what he did, (but he didn't program the computer to merely reverse the moves he converted algorithms used by humans to a form the computer could execute).
That one kid that is a red stone engineer: ha I’m the best!
Code Bullet: Are you challenging me?
VietnamThotPatrol Officer Long Wong I'm that red stone engineer UwU
Red stone engineers don’t say “UwU” that shit Is annoying
VietnamThotPatrol Officer Long Wong >:(
VietnamThotPatrol Officer Long Wong 𝙏𝙃𝙊𝙐 𝘼𝙍𝙏 𝙀𝙑𝙄𝙇
VietnamThotPatrol Officer Long Wong you’re cringe, the other person is cringe, I’m cringe for saying cringe.
This is the first code bullet video I've watched, immediately liked and subbed. Good job man!
"Welcome to Code Bullet!
Where we do the smartest stuff in the stupidest way possible"
I read that then it played in the vid
Kaden Roraback OMG WAS JUST ABOUT TO WRITE THAT. SAME HAPPENED TO ME
Is making a human a smart idea and if so how stupid could it get
*Next: **_creating an AI to code an AI that is used to create an automated AI creations automatically with a simple AI._*
Kowalski Analysis
Factorio ai
Do you want to end the world? Because that's how you end the world!
AIception
@@paradoxine6287
*AIception
When your PC can handle Minecraft but not a 100 x 100 x 100 cube model.
OOF!
bruh no r/wooosh
@@AbdullahB17 what
TheSourCitrus even i dont know what i replied lol
Umm Minecraft is made of bigger cubes duh!
Nitro Invert r/ihavereddit
Therapist: Pre-glowup Code Bullet isn’t real, he can’t hurt you
Pre-glowup Code Bullet:
If you keep this up you'll end up programming skynet.
Justin Y. found em with 5 likes
Hi justin, lont time no see
Justin Y. Are you on EVERY video? I just want to know and sorry if you take this as offensive
24 10hr
Yo. Yo, yo , yo. This dude's retired, right?
The scrambled 55x55x55 looks like a broken minecraft texture
It reminds me of the multicolor wool rooms noobs make on creative servers.
Yep. But mc textures are 16x16. So 16x16x16 cube will be more like mc then 55x55x55.
@@python_b like HD minecraft Hmmmm
Anamo has
It’s how Notch attempted to make the pig
Code Bullet, you cured my depression that I acquired from studying programming in the first place
Same brother
Lol
NewAri i think you’re confusing depression with clinical depression...
@@jenthefoxgirl1170 Its a joke. Programming can be very frustrating.
@@jenthefoxgirl1170 You do know he was joking, right?
Me who can’t solve a 3x3x3: …I HATE THIS
Robot who solved a 55x55x55:
Dude, you have to make either:
A) ai learns how to solve a megaminx
B) ai learns how to play tetris
Tetris, huh? I could do that. Interesting problem, it's np-complete. Maybe I will.
@@ConsciousExpression Just leaving a comment here to know when you finished your tetris project
I saw an AI playing tetris and right as it was about to lose it paused the game so it wouldnt lose xD
@@martiddy
It's always been something in the back of my mind as a fun little project, but there are already a few Tetris AIs on UA-cam, the main thing holding me back is just wondering what would make mine unique and therefore worth doing. Any ideas?
@@ConsciousExpression Maybe you could make an AI to play 3d tetris. That would be more difficult to the AI to learn instead of the regular 2d tetris.
Use a neural network and see if the computer can learn the algorithms on its own!!
NN would create some weird ass algorithms, I guarantee it
There will probably be a problem with that, since it's very hard to decide how far away from a solved cube the AI got on its turn. The other option of optimizing for speed is incredibly time consuming, with the first generation needing someone to solve the cube with ONLY RANDOM MOVES. A rubriks cube just needs way too much foresight for a neural network to find the algorithms on its own.
@@s.soderqvist3501 It might works if you first try to let it learn each small step of some algorithm, and once it learns that algorith, let it improve from there on it's own.
I mean it's kinda hard to come up with a heuristic (loss function) for such a problem....
I’d definitely like to see a neural network attack this. Maybe if you gave each ‘step’ x moves to then decide if it was getting closer. (In other words don’t try to evaluate if the cube is more or less solved until you’ve done 3 (or some other number of) moves)
I want a neural network to solve it!! There's no way a computer could learn to solve it on its own....
Yes, make it NEAT.
People have taught neural nets to solve cubes already. Here is a paper written about it:
arxiv.org/pdf/1805.07470.pdf
@@atticusbeachy3707 Yeah but CB didn't do it, so it isn't a REAL neural network.
DeepMind has done it! It's fantastic.
Brad Smith but how about on a 55x55?
I love how the scrambled cube looks like the tv static
That last round with the big cube felt super familiar. Then I realized what it was. It reminds me of the old Windows defrag visualization.
@@naso4265 YES!
@@naso4265 ah! the nostalgia homie! I've never met anyone who looks into a disk that is being defragged and says that's interesting, in fact, most people defrag disk when they can go off the screen because it is annoying and boring to watch and wait.
Big brain time
that's not an AI, but rather an algorithm? right?
Its to make views
These algorithms have always been considered part of the field of artificial intelligence. Machine learning is also algorithms.
AI and algorithms are not disjoint. If an algorithm processes some kind of environment to achive a goal, it's pretty much an AI.
AI and algorithms are completely synonymous, if you mean it doesnt use machine learning, then that's a completely different point.
@@bjordsvennson2726 A.I and algorithm are not synomous, but is true that all A.I are algorithms, but not all algorithms are A.I.
Imagine if your about to finish this and it pops
That hurts my feelings
I can’t, it’s to painful 😣
*In The End by Linkin Park starts playing*
*cries in nerd*
Fuck you
Jimmy Hill I wasn’t talking to you
Love it love it love it. Always a fun ride with you man!
Lol that footage at the end with the giant cube being solved kinda looks like a broken texture in a game slowly trying to render XD
Hahah yeah
Yeah it looks like a bug in minecraft.
@@lesom06 that would be 16x16x16
Rend isnt a word
@@Patchess The dictionary disagrees :-D
I remember seeing the 1000x1000x1000 solve a long time ago but I was too young to know what algorithms or reverse scrambles were. Really cool that you spent 40 hours programming a legitimate NxNxN Rubik's cube solver.
You spelled your profile name wrong
Man am I having SiIvaGunner flashbacks
it appears to be a (2N-1)x(2N-1)x(2N-1) cube solver, but yeah it is pretty neat.
You should do a video where an A.I. makes pixel art with the 55x55x55 rubik's cube
Good practice run to make skynet
I believe its just as easy to do that as normal. You just have to recode what a solved cube looks like and reassign the nerd values to the makemesoundsmart squares in the configuration of what the art look like.
Dracibatic got em, right bro?
7:46 raise the editor's salary he wont do that again
That's cool but can you make rubiks cube where every block is a rubiks cube?
Basically the infinity's cube.
rubikstesseract solving AI when?
That would still be a huge ass rubicks cube.
That would be easy to solve because u have to solve every rubicks cube for only 1 colour
@@korosensei2841 two for edge pieces, three for corners.
A 3x3 can always be solved in 20 moves or less. Could you create an AI that does this? That would be *extra* cool.
yea,bruteforcing it. Its pretty slow
@@alexvisan7622 It doesn't have to be, just look at some of the fastest machine cube solvers, they do a very efficient method and calculate it in a time that is extremely fast if you compare it to this
@@cofromdiscord118 Near optimal algorithms are very fast, but only solve the cube in 22-23 moves. Most cubes can be solved in 18 moves or less though, and some very slow algorithms are dedicated to solving cubes in the shortest number of moves, guarenteed.
@@cofromdiscord118 you could bruteforce the cube until you get the required pattern. So,while following the steps (white cross etc) you would get optimal transitions between the steps
I believe some people at google already tried this, and I don't know how successful they were, but you definitely need a supercomputer to even attempt it.
What about an AI that plays tetris without loosing and you could slowly ramp up speed the blocks drop at to see at which point the ai can't keep up.
The AI doesn't care about how fast it's moving
The most successful algorithms would be using only the “next block” preview window to inform their move decision above a certain speed. It could make for an interesting project.
or which point his pc can't keep up
Without loosing what? Seriously though it’s actually kind of interesting the algorithms that were designed to not lose at Tetris in that one of them I saw would pause the game when it was about to lose and never unpause it.
@@jbarr5880 When your AI rage quits😂
" My computer had a *stroke* "
First video of theirs I've watched and I already love it.
"I did try a 1000 by 1000 but my computer had a stroke"
Code Bullet-2018
Nobody:
Ur legs after sitting in the toilet for too long: 11:00
Very underrated comment.
Tru
Or when i crossed my legs for too long
So you guys need to re-read the comment he wrote unless you guys actually sit in the toilet...
Tru
feels like I'm defragging my hard drive in 3d
Dang. I wish this fella still made content.
These videos were so good.
he does make content
@@kriegenjoyer6913 I wish - That would be amazing. I loved this guy.
@@WV-HillBilly His last video was like a few weeks ago
@@kriegenjoyer6913 sort of.. like nobody cares about some donkey kong trash or his 16th revisit to AI learning to walk..
I mean when he actually made *content* it was so good. I wish he'd come back and make some more. I miss him.