Salam! Before scrolling through the comments be sure to subscribe to our channel and hit the bell so you don't miss out any of our future content. Enjoy the video.
Galat, There was nothing called Mugal. Official name of so called Mugal Empire is "Riyasat E Hingdoostan ریاساتِ ہندوستان" in Persian and "Mamlakat Al Hindia مملكة الهندية" in Arabic. And From Arabic Hindia modern term "India" evolved via latin.. If modern Indians really hate Ghori to Bahadur Shah Jafar's rule then they have no right to claim over "Hingdoostan"
Waaswrwb! The glaring evidence of Aurangzeb's tolerance is standing right in the Capital city - Aurangabad (named after Aurangzeb) of the then Mughal empire as the "temple" of Khajuraho riddled with nude and vulgar sculptures in utterly inhumane and disgraceful sexual acts involving animals and orgies. Had Aurangzeb not been "exceptionally" tolerant, why would this thousands of years old temple survive in Aurangabad??? 🤔
I recall Aurangzeb subtly mentioned as the worst mughal emperor from history books whereas Akbar was mentioned as one of the greatest. I read Aurangzeb killed his brothers but the books choose to skip the mughal legacy of brothers fighting for the throne.
@@shazainbaloch2538 In lslamc world it is very very common, they kill each other, they marry there own sister, halala etc. Very very very common.... !!!!! But in Bharat it is brutal act even in ancient Bharat. It is land of God Ram.
Aurangzeb killed 3 of his brother Ultra right wing - he was evil Ashoka the great killed his 101 brothers Same people - what a humble and down to earth leader
he made the point that he is ruler not good or bad. A ruler who ruled to preserve his authority. If you can't get that then we know where the bigotry is
@@motei1853 he didn't talk about jizya tax which was a additional tax to be paid by Hindu if they didn't want to be converted he also didn't mention how he betrayed Shivaji and his son Sambhaji he forcefully killed Banda Bahadur and his 4 year old son. Did he mention any of this?he just mentioned the points where aurangzeb was portrayed as a grey character. This is a common fallacy called half truth half lie he is only telling points which fames him not the points which clearly mention him as a cruel unjust ruler
You mentioned Guru Teg bahadur only , why not his successor Guru Gobind Singh (his son ) and 4 of his sons ... Out of them 2 were teenagers who were murdered brutally by Aurangzeb ...
They where not killed by aurengzeb sab kuch Aurangzeb pe dal do sikhs se puri history distorted hai.aurengzeb ke under sikhs aur hindu b the unko convert nhi kiya usne kabhi forcefull tumhre guru ko kiya aur kashmiri brahmins ko mai khud kashmiri hu.history ko change karna brahmin ka he kaam hai.
I am from Punjab India after hearing your entire argument i feel that you had glorified him toooo much even from your argument it is proven he was an extremist person though I will say hindu vs muslim propoganda came way later in the conflict but he was no where perfect as u say why was so much revolt in his era ????? Why did so many revolt against him to the extent he had fled when had 25 percent of the world's wealth and large land under his rule??? Why sikh revolted and when the concept of military and rule did not exist in Sikhism when it started when up to five generations of Sikhs never touched a weapon in their life ??? Was it just to imprison two children not even 10 in the tower with their grandmother and then carving them in the wall alive so this was your just king just trying to rule ? What he was just a king blindly after more power no matter the cost It is not about hindu or muslim but there is no dout in my mind about the converges as other wise there is no explanation to large muslim population in India for centuries even before British came we to the date remeber those who were forced to convert but they never covered in our religion text now don't say there were changed by British To my conclusion most of hate between hindu and muslim today was due to British but this long you glorify was not as just as you say
veer ji 🙏, the comment you've written is very much correct... but my request to you is please give an extra space between the paragraphs so that it can be read easily 🙏. people often don't read long and congested comments that's why....I request whoever is reading my reply to this comment please read the full comment before coming to any conclusion to the video 🙏.
@@SourabhSharma4584 Half of Pakistan's population already lives in Britain. I am an ex-muslim from Afghanistan now a nomad in Europe. My Afghanistan is destroyed by extremism and Taliban but who destroyed Pakistan ?
Ashoka Shivaji Maharaj Chandragupta Maurya Raja Raja Chola Krishna Deva Raya Rejendar Chola Emperor Harsha Emperor Vikramaditya Kanishka I Samudragupta Kumargupta I could go on...
Pandya Empire (4th century BCE - 1345 CE) - over 1700 years Chola Empire (848 CE - 1279 CE) - 431 years Satavahana Empire (230 BCE - 220 CE) - 450 years Hoysala Empire (1026 CE - 1343 CE) - 317 years Vijayanagara Empire (1336 CE - 1646 CE) - 310 years Mughals around 200 years.. Understand before all the islamic invasions India had many kingdoms and empires.. Mughals were not so great, under Aurengzeb he and his kingdom were rich top in the world maybe, but all those welth were looted by Indian public, Under King Harsha people were rich, he use to donate gold and diamonds to people. (ref- Xuanzang ). That time period is known as "The Golden Age Of India".
Aurangzeb ordered to destroy every temple in chamba , himachal pradesh but brave king of chamba with some other kings opposed it and fought with Mughals and won. And people say Aurangzeb was good person
2:20 yeppp he's so right!!! Mumtaz was so beloved to Shah Jahan that he made her born 14 children and she didn't just "passed away" . She died during her 14th delivery. Man why this world always shows them as so innocent!!! And Shah Jahan was so great that after his so called beloved wife's death he married his own young daughter just because he was attracted towards her daughter's physique!!!!!! Such a great ruler he was right people??? He destroyed Hindu temples. And not only one or two or three ....many many many temples which were of very great importance to our culture. These people are just sitting out of India and talking about our history???? India's culture has always been the Sanatan Dharma and it always will be . The Mughals, the English all were just invaders . Our culture and our history would always be Sanatan that's it.
@@KidsGaming7787 your best reply was WhatsApp University..mate ur names Android gaming what's more cringe then that..always turning a blind eye to the atrocities lol
Opposing and criticising the Hinduism, is because of the insecurity of these people towards their religion. But it's the only religion which speaks of Vashudeva Kutumbakkam. Long live Sanatan Dharma.
You are the one that runs to Muslims in order to make your made up stories of a religion look superior, you guys have such an inferiority complex. The brother didn't even condemn Hindus and here you come blabbering. It's really pathetic and Shri ram is dead.
For someone who is interested in South Asian history, I find "India in the Persianate Age 1000-1765" by Richard Eaton a very good read. It gives historical unbiased accounts of what happened during these eras. People need to understand that the past were just turbulent times and people formed allies and enemies regardless of religion.We can't judge events based through modern context. Some rulers embraced the plurality of South Asia and others took advantage of it. It was Hindu against Hindu. Muslim against Muslim. Hindu and Muslim against Muslim to gain favour and to gain territorial expansion. The Jizya tax was most likely levied during the beginning stages of the decline of the empire since corruption was starting to become common. He was the first Mughal ruler to do so and maybe out of necessity. In another instant it was reported that he would execute non-muslims lest they convert. Other instances mention him patronizing Hindu Temples, providing land grants, monetary support. Non-Muslims either vilified him or called him benevolent. It was more about upholding treaties, stability, and territory than actual religion. That's what the book explains as the hybridization of both the Sanskrit and the Persianate world. If you play close attention to current North Indian/Pakistani cultures, you will exactly see those influences. Mughals both took part in Hindu traditions as Islamic. They celebrated Diwali, Norooz, Eid, and other local festivals that reflect their environment and their heritage. They consulted with both Hindu astrologers and Muslim Clerics. Sanskrit scriptures were translated to Persian to give wider access. Historic India, just as South Asia now is a mosaic and a hybrid of many cultures that passed through. If you're South Asian then understand that our societies aren't simply black or white.
Sir I have a 2 questions 1. Why didn't you explain about re-imposing of jizya tax and imposing extra taxes on non-muslim traders by Aurangzeb 2.If Aurangzed was that good administrator, A perfect statesmen, A great religious being (who liked replacing others religious sites with mosques by going against the quran)then why did his empire started to fall apart after his successfull tenure.
Q1. Aurangzeb imposed Jiziya because he was a fundamentalist Muslim. He also damaged temples of regions where kings confronted him and refused to accept his rule, like Gyanvapi. On other hand he also built temples in regions governed by him and where he did not face rebellion. Q2. How is Aurangzeb responsible for his successors turning out to be incompetent? When Alamgir himself ruled he expanded Hindostan's borders from Peshawar to Deccan. He was a conqueror and an abled administrator.
@@Kishori_Kripa not sure about the built part but his giving grants to temples and land for their construction is recorded in history. Aurangzeb’s orders to harm specific temples is seen as symptomatic of a larger vendetta against Hindus. I don't think Aurangzeb has gotten an honest scholarship, either side has highlighted the part which favors them for agenda.
Because the failed end that how he failed as sir said he fought for political power .So when guru gobind singh ji left their Qila why he still killed everyone of them and even his young sons what crime they committed .
@@zaid_wani Q1. -> So you say that non-muslim have to suffer and pay extra taxes only because their ruller is a muslim even if they serve in his army, Finance his invoasions and e.t.c. ->What part do I and other normal hindus have in the rebellion why did Aurangzed the secular distoryed my sacread sites in the name of crushing the rebellion ->And please don't cleansify him by saying that it was rule of law then .If 100 kings(Hindu, muslim,sikh and however) did these acts classify all of them as vicious, antagonistic,bigot and e.t.c in this perticular aspect. ->U say that akhbar is not a pious muslims because he removed the good jizya, was he an Anti-national (in right wing indian terminology). Q2. He has a part in the fall of mughal empire because *He wagged an unfruitfull war in the deccan for a quarter centuary(25years) and he has also failed at last in that war *He has not handdled a single major rebellion in an efficient manner .All of his actions were only fuelling those rebellions which at last overthrowed the mighty mughal empire. Note:-please don't cleansify him ,no one has a part in his actions (glorify other farsighted ,efficient rullers like akhbar, shah jahan(they were also muslims) and e.t.c to pramote religious harmony)
I thought there must be something in history about Aurangazeb that was intentionally skipped but after watching I am truly disappointed that whatever the Audrey gang claimed is nothing but the concoction of lies and misinterpretations. 1. Did Aurangazeb kill guru Teg bahadur? Ans- yes but they tried to whitewash it by making arguments like he just tried to destroy the armed rebellion. 2. Did he reimpose jizya on non-Muslims which was abolished by Akbar? Ans- still yes 3. Did he destroy Hindu mandirs ? Ans- still yes but they tried to find out the intention of alamgir who killed all his brothers and imprisoned his own father . Now let me tell u why the Muslim rulers destroyed Hindu and Jain temples again and again. Because temples are the centre of life of Hindus be it economic , educational or social everything revolved around temples. So they realised if they destroy temples normally whole system would eventually collapse.
How easily is he saying he destroyed a few thousand temples? Like that's a small number. Let me ask you how many mosques he destroyed? The whole video shows how all the bad things done by Aurangzeb were not that big deal, that's all. I can't believe he is even trying to justify killing of guru tegh bahadur, that is beyond shameful. You should be ashamed of yourself for glorifying such a monster.
Indian economy sbse peak pr thi uske kingdom mein or worldwide ameer country bhi . Infact use uski simplicity ke lie bhi jana jata hai ,use criticise krke kuch nai milna indian rich history ka part hai . I know hindu muslims ke beech mein differences the pr muslims ko blame krne se pehle indian kings ki history dekh lo itna class system caste system tha .
Ya its true what about destroying the tulja bhavani temple in Deccan by afzal khan one of his officers who then tore into pieces by chatrapati shivaji maharaj
@@kamnakanu505 Indian economy peak par thi kyunki akbar, jahangir, shah jahan jaise mahan emperors ne iske liye kaam kiya tha.. Bigoted aurnagzeb ne to poori economy aur military might khatm kar diya tha mughlas ka.. End me to uske paas apne soldiers ko salary dene tak ka paisa nhi bacha tha.. Ek aadmi jisne duniya ke sbse amir empire ko nanga kar diya deccan me fight krte krte usse bada chutiya badshah history me na huya.
@@pranavnishad4890 but yeh alegation ki sirf muslims ne hindu temple ko demolish kia yeh glt hai cholas pandyas ,rashtrkutas ka history bhi prhlo Shiv or vishnu disciples bhi aps mein ladte rhe hai unho ne bhi ek durse ke temples demolish kiye hai . Aristocracy ke time pr hrr raja ka vision tha ki vo apni superiority bnaye. So plzz bnd kro mughal hate n all.
Okay so u should also tell how Aurangzeeb killed and what offer he gave to Sambhaji Maharaj (king of maratha empire).Also he didn't distroyed any temples right ? So what about ajanta caves which was distroyed by Aurangzeeb he send over 1000 of men to distroy it still they failed to distroy it completely.U can't imagine how we hindus feel when we see our history and culture distroyed by mugal empires. Also tell the story of Moinuddin Chishti sofi saint who used to slaughter cows in temples just to humiliate hindus.
@@thauthentic pls i beg u to search i am not lying i have visted ajanta caves my self and it's clearly distroyed.I don't hate muslims i admire akbar and tipu sultan but glorfying any person just cause he is from your relgion is not fair.We forgive u but it's not like u can change history.
@@thauthentic it's completely worthless to argue with u cause i am not talking here about relgion i am here talking about emperor who was not good.Also u have half knowledge 1.It was allaudin khilji to distroy nalanda university which stopped buddhism in India.Also nalanda university was made by hindu kind which was having holy text of all hinduism,buddhism and Jainism.So blaming hindus for it completely foolish thing.Also nepla has 81% hindu population 2.Zorastrian was also distroyed completely from Iran by muslim invader and hindu kings were the only one who gave them place as refugee.That's why India has largest population of Zorastrians. 3.Also u need to understand we live in moderm world with many relgions it's better to respect them.If u consider your relgion true it's good but u can't just throw on someones face cause it can lead your community bad impression,inharmony basically make u preachers. 4.I don't hate muslims it's just u can just make a ruler hero who distroyed many temples and was cruel.
@@thauthentic he was discussing about aurangzeb and you took this topic somewhere else. Whatever brahmins did to lower caste people or buddhist is not the topic. Aurangzeb destroyed temples and killed so many hindus. Imposed taxes on non muslim people. Converted so many hindus. Killed gurus. This all is not a lie ok. Don't just defend him.
@@thauthentic why are you changing the topic? We are talking about Aurangzeb why are you trying to point out faults in Hinduism? Should I also point out faults in your religion? You people follow a man who consummated his marriage with a 9 year old girl, you people perform jihad to have 72 prostitutes in heaven. Why are you pointing out Brahmins, first tell me about your community.
How violence against thousands of people who just wanted to practice there way of leaving on there land which they are doing since mankind evolve is being justified. Tribute to our Gurus (हिन्द दी चादर गुरु तेग बहादुर) who fought against the evil. Jai chatrapati shivaji maharaj ❤️
@@timrasulov5678 May I ask you how would you summarise the India after 2014? Probably that it has grown intolerant. Guess what, the mainstream media is full of lies, break you bubble kid
How was India under Muslim rule? "Until 1000 AD, India's economy was a subsistence economy with GDP per capita just above subsistence level, and with no GDP growth between 1 and 1000 AD (Hindu era)... By the late 17th century, most of the Indian subcontinent had been reunited under the Mughal (Islamic) Empire, which for a time became the largest economy and manufacturing power in the world, producing about a quarter of global GDP." - Historical Statistics by Professor Angus Maddison - How was India under British rule? How is it today under Hindu rule? ~Share if you like this :) 542
@@tvshowmemes-jt8eb just like any other empire the Mughals committed crimes but to say the Mughals were our to kill Hindus is a lie the Mughals made india rich and had no issue with Hindus they killed those who opposed the empire not targeting Hindus because they are Hindus!!!
okey before Mughals India was even more prosperous. they came India because India was a golden bird . they even don't know about anything about kala that's why they destroyed University and temple. those Indian temples were not only for worship but those were educational centers and Those were heritage of India . They were jihadi and converted Hindus forcefully. raped women that why Women did johar
What a just king, even though his brother was going to split Aurangya into parts he just cut off his head and sent it to his imprisoned father as a gift, truly humble👍🙏
@@musa7955 99 half brother and one more. but for indian pajet৳s Ashoka like their father 😂they dont know why they did this. even most of the Emperor did this thing.
@Gangeyan Stop being selective and bring full facts of destruction of Kashi temple. If it has ever been destroyed. In those times Kings were not bigots like Modi of today. They rewarded equally whether Hindus or Muslims for loyalty to King and punished indiscriminately whosoever rebelled against the King.
@Gangeyan A few month ago your Zealots burned Masjid and homes of thousands of Indian Muslims in capital Delhi. No sane person would like to visit a country where even Capital is engulfed in civil war and were Hindutva mobs can do anything with help of establishment and police. Propaganda of becoming so called Vishv Guru will not work longer. Hindutva mobs will expose Indian sooner than later. Its already Rapistan and lynching-Stan what next?
@@TajamalGhumman yaah bro you are correct You saw right how many temples he built We were wrong for just seeing the (physical evidences of domolished temples) And please can you name a bunch of temples built by great aurangzeb My memory is a bit cloudy
Yes read about how under his regime two young kids of 5 and 9 baba fateh singh and baba zorawar singh killed for not accepting islam . Nightmare it is to remember such a regime of islam
@@FaizanKhan-um6bn unlike how a prophet who married a girl of age 7 is Respected , baba fateh singh was actually stood up against islamic oppressors at a tender age .
India's "Golden Age" is generally considered to be the Gupta period, which lasted from around 320 CE to 550 CE. During this time, the Gupta Empire achieved unprecedented prosperity and cultural achievements. The Gupta era is often referred to as a high point in Indian civilization and is regarded as a time of peace, stability, and prosperity. Mughals were rich because of the same reason why British East India Company was a billion dollar company - LOOT. Both of them looted Indian people through different means. Under Guptas, cholas, Vijayanagar people were rich Under Aurengzeb- He was rich and some officials who worked for him, not General public.
India is having golden period before maughal Empire too..India and Africa were the having great resources.. Islamisation and colonisation was the problem that made India poor.. don't worry we will reclaim everything again soon..
He murdered his REAL Brother(but he was kind to hindus) He imprisoned his REAL Father (he had his own brand of justice) He slaughtered a peaceful protesting saint & destroyed 1000s of Temples (it was to preserve his understanding of mughal justice and extend control over India) But he was not a bigot May peace be upon him 😂😂😂😂😂 And they say people misunderstood islam
@@arqamhanfi5683 @Arqam Hanfi bhai agar ban jaata toh burhanpur bhi aagra hota aaj soch kitne tourist aate (ebony or ivory ho jaata) 7 wonders mein se 2 apne hote tu bs soch mere bhai
Ah yes. The Muslim Skeptic mentioned this woman in a short, and how Hindutva critics wanted to go after her for her publications. (BTW, share the Muslim Skeptic's "The Curse of Polytheism." It's a fantastic watch, and a potential weapon against the Hindutva.)
@@glarysouls1333 we Muslims do not create war, we react to what the world is trying to put upon us, ie Islamophobia. There is no cumpulsion in religion. But it's also said Fight those who fight you. So the dawah going across the globe is reactionary to the circumstances today. Anything wrong with that?
From Wikipedia - in November 1675, he was transferred to Delhi and asked to perform a miracle to prove his nearness to God or convert to Islam.[39] The Guru declined and three of his colleagues, who had been arrested with him, were tortured to death in front of him: Bhai Mati Das was sawn into pieces, Bhai Dayal Das was thrown into a cauldron of boiling water, and Bhai Sati Das was burned alive.[39] Thereafter, Tegh Bahadur was publicly beheaded in Chandni Chowk, a market square close to the Red Fort.[39][41] Aurangzeb, a man of justice.
this is just a lie thatw as told 120 yrs before teg bahadurs exercution in all sources even in persian sources says he was kiled due to his looting and mutiny in punjab
He killed Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur for stopping him from forcefully converting Kashmiri Hindus. There is a Gurudwara in Chandni Chowk. Anyone who wants to know how cruel Aurangzeb was must visit that place.
Bro im kashmiri I'm getting this news for the first time, Alhumdulillah we were brahmins & became muslim because Islam makes sense ask any kashmiri hindu how kashmiris majority became muslim.
@@harismushtaq7526 we don't need to ask them, we already know that those Kashmiri Pandits were forced to convert. All these are recorded in real Kashmir files. Alhamdulillah, Jai Matadi.
@@chiranjibihasnu4910 lmao, kashmiri files is an exaggeration, plus I'm talking when most of the kashmiris converted to islam about centuries ago. At that time we had a hindu raja.
@@siddhantpatil3578 leave it out the moghuls put india on the map and civilised the place prior to that people were running round naked and throwing widows on the funeral pyre of their husband burned to death alive.
@@siddhantpatil3578 humlog Marriage karte hain. Bina Marriage ke koi ladki ke paass nahi jaate. Tumlog to apni biwi ke alawa har jagah mu marte ho. Adultery or fornication is prohibited in Islam. Ye to hame poochna chahiye tujhse ke Tera baap kon hai. Saale tumlog to har jagah mu marte ho
@@jimmykahn5431 go and read about Ashoka the great kid than you will know. Islam is an ignorant religion. By invasions you spread your religion and still talks about peace ☮️😂. You guys are lucky that our faith tell us about to respect others religion or else there will no evidence of Islam left in the World
There's nothing radical about getting infuriated about true past. ua-cam.com/video/ohMw2oNTkMI/v-deo.html Above are the deeds of Aurangzeb and Mughal brothers
@@theforgottenhistory8450 but are hindus literally going to any video that praises Islam and make fun of it ok? Tell me and also more muslims are being killed my modi and yet people care about that part
Because indians , with majority Hindus, will twist the narrative to their advantage. Also, I don't think there's a law in India that says foreigners can't learn Indian history and comment about it.
@@unmouscat no, if that were the case, you wouldn't have been even allowed to set foot in India. I see you want to relate everything with your religion. That's not what actually Quran taught. Quran teaches to respect other's religion. It teaches to respect that person who has saved even 1 life, and despise that who has killed even 1, yet even as a Muslim yourself, you are forgetting the narrative. As time changed, your definitions of kafir also changed. I hope for the best and I also REALLY hope you stop glorifying hitler soon. You never know.... 😌
Well you shouldn’t but if that ideology still exists you have to resist it and fight against it. What Aurangzeb was a true Muslim nothing more nothing less. He considered his brother kafir, killed him not because he wanted to but because Islam says so. He killed many Hindus/Christians/Sikhs not because they were up in arms against him, but just because they practiced a different religion they were given an option either convert or pay a tax for protection and if you can’t do both, You DiE. Not because he liked it but because Islam says so. This ideology is still rampant in India.
In 1679 Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj protested against Jizya tax, Shivaji Maharaj in a letter to Aurangzeb wrote: I have learnt that because of your wars against me your treasury is exhausted So, you have decreed that Jizya be collected from the Hindus. Your ancestors Akbar, Jahangir and Shah Jehan could have also levied the Jizya but they rid their hearts of bigotry because they knew all men, high or low, were created by God and they represented various religions. Hence, their prosperity increased and they were successful. In your reign, the army is uneasy, traders unhappy, Muslims cry and Hindus seethe with anger. You have lost many forts and provinces Since I shall not desist from inflicting more devastation you will lose the rest, also!
Such insecure comments can only come from lindus 😂. Every Mughal Emperor faced resistance, be it from Hindus or Sikhs. No other Mughal Emperor managed to capture the vast land that Aurangzed Captured. Shivaji was defeated and had to escape with the help of locals 😂. Looser 😂
What made him Controversial ? For a start - he came to the throne after imprisoning his father and having his older brother assassinated. And in comparison with other Mughal rulers, he fared badly - his great-grandfather Akbar was described as the benign secular ruler, grandfather Jahangir was known for his love for art and architecture and father Shah Jahan was the great romantic who built the Taj Mahal. But Aurangzeb, the sixth emperor and a devout Muslim, was often described as a ruthless tyrant who was an expansionist, imposed tough Sharia laws and brought back the discriminatory "JIZYA TAX" that Kaafirs had to pay in return for protection. And the Poor Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Zoroastrians (Persians) who couldn't pay taxes converted to Islam just so they can stay safe. All the Muslims in India you see today have Non-Muslims Lineage. He was also described as someone who hated music and other fine arts, and ordered the destruction of several temples. What a Saint 🤡 Madrasachap Historians trying to Rewrite History LMFAO. Ever heard of Mauryan or Chola empire. What about Vikramaditya ? Your Islamic Poets mentioned him to have Ruled the whole Arabic Peninsula. A Whole Era was named after him. Battle of Haifa Go Brrrrrrrr....... This comment section remind me of a Rural WhatsApp Group. Cope Buslims.
@@danbar3440 what is so great that was achieved by Aurangzeb that was not achieved by Jahangir or Akbar? People did admire Sher Shah Suri the one who's currency rupiya is still in use in the Around Indian Subcontinent. Glorification can't happen just because he was Mughal emperor. Again invasions always result in destruction of details and who to know better than Mughal emperors who invaded and destroyed ancient temples and monasteries? Simple I don't emphatize with people who blindly beleive the stories on Hindu greatness but I reckon that's what is being done here too.
Well why do people in india hate aurangzeb but not other mughal emperor that much . Think of it there should be a reason right. It's because of aurangzeb cruelty towards hindu . I am not that of religious guy but it's a fact that he killed many hindu and destroyed temples .
@@iamuzumakianduchiha776 he caused a genocide of hindus in medieval India Up until the the rule of Chhatrapti Shivaji Maharaj, in the muslim ruled India, 437 hindus died every day due to the genocide Chhatrapati Shivaji Mahraj fought against this genocide Who's great now?
@@derkonig2292 👍 brainwashed muslims, he literally gave you guys wrong information, i am not surprised he is doing that , afterall this is a islamic channel
Very interesting video, I believe that Zafarnama written by Govind Singh was the pivotal moment of his reign ending, due to bricking alive the two songs of Govind.
here are some more information for you: Forced conversions: Aurangzeb was known for his religious zealotry and enforced Islamic law strictly. He imposed the jizya tax on non-Muslims and prohibited them from holding high offices in the government. He also ordered the destruction of Hindu and Sikh temples and forced many Hindus to convert to Islam. Execution of his own family members: Aurangzeb had his own brother Dara Shikoh executed, along with his sons and other family members, in a bid to claim the throne. He also imprisoned his father Shah Jahan for the last eight years of his life and did not allow him to see the outside world. Brutal treatment of Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur: Guru Tegh Bahadur, the ninth Sikh Guru, was executed by Aurangzeb in 1675 for refusing to convert to Islam. The Guru's followers were also brutally tortured and killed. Intolerance towards other religions: Aurangzeb was known for his intolerance towards other religions, including Hinduism, Sikhism, and Jainism. He ordered the destruction of many temples and persecuted religious leaders who did not conform to his strict interpretation of Islam. Economic policies: Aurangzeb's economic policies were also controversial. He raised taxes to finance his military campaigns, leading to widespread poverty and famine in some parts of the country.
@@Unknowndadofyou he isn’t talking about mugal conquest he is exposing the myths. Still mugals beat your kings that why he is controversial because you are jealous of aurengzeb he expanded his kingdom which no other kind did during his time gdp of his kindom was one third of whole world gdp. And your kings couldn’t evey do this
After using two of his brothers to sabotage Dara, he killed those two brothers too, you unknowingly missed to mention or was it strategically excluded in your video?
6:15 He placed his father under house incarceration because his father was lavishly spending the state’s treasury on The construction of extravagant monuments. 6:37 He banned music because it is Haraam in Islam.
I like the way you present, it was informative. But I see a sense of biased inclination and trying to justify some bad events doesn't help in seeing this in a neutral way. If you look at a question... Why Akbar was respected where as Aurangzeb hated? As per my view this video is incomplete!
@@sheiruto1058 Yeah and his purpose was to suppress Hindus..... 😎Now start saying,so what,we had given you 2 chances.. either pay Jizya tax or gets converted otherwise 🗡️⚔️
Yes we need to calm down he was a good man...who cares if he ordered genocide of Hindus...We Hindus exist to suffer. Now you will agree with me! And as a matter of fact Learn about Gupta Empire,Mauryan Empire and Chola empire, Mughals were no where close to them. And the original Indian architecture made by them is still un matchable.
He was a great king who lived simple life and never used a single rupee from the treasure or people's money for his daily bread instead he used to sew prayers mats, caps and used to write copies of Quran by his hand and sell them in the market and auction. Many people don't know that he was a first ever Mughal or Muslim king who had the largest number Hindus soldiers ever. Almost 35% of army was based on Hindu commanders and soldiers. 25% world's GDP and wealth was in the control of india, he created more than 135 temples for hindus. Some of them still have copy of his charity papers. As per the authentic historic references he demolished only 2 temples and 1 mosque because of thr solid reasons behind them. India was the richest and largest nation during his reign. But still many corrupt, communal amd extremist put false blames on him.
I strictly feel the need for Pakistan to arrange series on mughal empire to make people aware. It would be good if people knew the real story behind. I honestly hate people demonizing something rightful into a crime.
Everything you hear around you is a narrative influenced by knowledge, biases, perspective etc. The same is the case with this historian who has made hinduphobic comments in the past. History is written by victors and no king will agree to publish the negative side of his rule. Every human has a good and bad side to him, the balance decides your character. The author tries to just pick the good side. Accounts of atrocities have been termed as exaggerated by her as later addition. Then why can't the same logic be applied to the good part mentioned. She says her role is to not be perfect but get the ball rolling forward. That's the most absurd thing to say for a historian. The role of the historian is to try to be perfect by trying to find the absolute truth. If the ball is rolled towards a narrative instead of the truth then you cannot call yourself a historian. You are now a "STORY TELLER".. Hindus are now a much angrier bunch because they are tired of targeting and slandering done on their religion when on the contrary they have been accepting and tolerating for so many years. You will hardly find hindus meddling with the business of other religions or insulting them unless provoked. Hindus and India is the only country that had sheltered majority of the prosecuted religion in the past when Christians and muslims were converting and plundering people of other faith. Hindus don't hate Mughals except a few people with an agenda. We have made movies on them, it's just that the majority do not like aurangzeb for his atrocities on other faiths. We have the 3 famous khan movie stars in india belonging to the minority community. How many people in Muslim and Christian countries support in such a way their minorities. Hypocrisy at its peak. This is the irony.
@@rishiphadnis1 Sultan Aurangzeb gave a lashing to the Brits in Mughal-Anglo war (1686-1690). Remember, the colonialists (at the time, Portuguese) were already in India before Babur started his conquests.
You say that the "unjust killing of the ninth Sikh Guru" is often "exaggerated through conflicting reports" and therefore, imply, that the killing (Martyrdom in the Sikh tradition) was justified. Your claim is no better than your alleged conflicting reports. You say that the "earliest sources" don't even elaborate on the Ninth Guru's peaceful protest against the forceful conversion of Kashmiri Brahmins into Daruslam by Aurangzeb. Did you not read "Bhat Vahi Multani-Sindhi" or "Bhat Vahi Talauda Pargana Jind", some of the contemporary accounts in the form of Bhat Vahi (written scrolls still preserved at the Punjab University Patiala)? Go and check them out. Did you not read Hari Ram Gupta's extensive work on the “History of the Sikhs” where he enumerates multiple examples of forceful conversions and fanaticism of Aurangzeb from other original sources: "Akhbar-i-Darbar-i- Mualla (The Royal Mughal Court News)", and "Kalimat-e- Tayibat", and "Ahkam-e-Alamgiri". You say that Persian and the Sikh sources state that Aurangzeb had the Ninth Guru executed because of his "military opposition" to the Mughal interests that had caused civil unrest; and therefore his execution was justified. Would you justify the persecution and forceful removal of Prophet Muhammad from Medina by the powerful merchants because He was causing a civil unrest? I guess you don't. Similarly, what you call a civil unrest was the opposition by the Ninth Guru of the cruel fanaticism of a Mughal emperor by peaceful means. Secondly, this shows that you have not engaged with the original Sikh sources (some of them mentioned above). Did you not read the Pracheen Panth Prakash or Gurpartap Suraj Granth, two of the original Sikh sources, that clearly state the protection of humanity as the main reason why the Ninth Guru sacrificed Himself? Thirdly, there is nothing wrong with militarily opposing a tyrant. We, as Sikhs, are not only proud to have opposed the Mughal interests but to have eternally uprooted the largest Mughal dynasty South-Asia had ever seen; have you hear of Baba Banda Singh Bahadur (read Dr Ganda Singh’ “Life of Banda Singh Bahadur”, a work of monumental historical importance). Yes, Aurangzeb was not perfect. But so weren't the merchants of Medina who persecuted Prophet Muhammad or Hitler who persecuted Jews or the RSS who are now persecuting the minorities in India. All of the above shows that you are indeed a bigot who reads history selectively.
RSS is persecuting minorities? I think u have confused rss for bajrang dal which is an extremist organisation.RSS majorly focusses on cultural development and spread of knowledge about hinduism. RSS dosent even involve itself in political situations or displays of powers lol.
@@calamity3224Bajrang Dal, RSS or Shiv Sena or the current extremely intolerant government of India backed by the population with a majoritarian mindset. They all something in common: they all went to impose Hinduism on Sikhs, Muslims and Dalits just like Aurangzeb did back then. The proposition that RSS is cultural organisation spreading knowledge about Hinduism is laughable. That’s a highly dangerous organisation infiltrating the Sikh organisations under the patronage of the BJP in order to culturally assimilate them. Maybe that’s what you meant when you said that they spread knowledge about Hinduism .
@@money5434 The incidents u gave me about forced conversions have been clarified in the book i suggested you. Their isn't any convincing evidence for forced conversions during Aurangzeb regime.
He was a true Muslim. Merciful for the believers and mighty against the disbelievers. Sultan Salahuddin, Badshah Alamgir, Sultan Suleman they were the man, followers of the prophet Muhammad (sa). They established the Islamic law. We really miss them. O Allah have mercy on their soul. You are the most merciful.
By that logic anyone who doesn't follow hinduism is also disbeliever! and In a country like India which is Hindu majority country anyone who doesn't follow hinduism should be killed right? Well, since this is the islamic way it should also be the same for hinduism, from now on I will never question a hindu killing a muslim because muslims are disbeliever in India and they should be killed.
@@humblereactions2467 No but if he says that *and* decides to become a threat to the muslims, then it is permissible to kill him by law. This also goes for apostasy in Islam btw
Aurangzeb was so much coward that even sikh guru's children were threat to him and his religion. But children of guru Gobind and banda Singh bhadur were not coward like him. There were bricked alive but didn't converted to muslim. True Sikhs♥️
Statistics is the art of bending numbers for the result you want. This video reminds me of that. Well story telling is a story told by the teller. This was funny, and for that, I thank you.
actually I was thinking, why would this ruler, have hindus of the higher class, as his advisor even when he could just forcefully convert them,"hey you wanna be my advisor? be a Muslim or u be executed". or enticed them with luxury. doesn't make sense. that's why i believe he didn't.
Because they were the most educated ones with administrative skills. Even the British used Brahmins. Were they going to import tribesmen from Uzbekistan which is where the Mughals came from? They were essentially nomadic herders that conquered a weak but intellectual civilisation.
Because forcing people to Islam would be against the religion and that was one of the main things that Aurangzeb stood by. But you can try to convince and call to them but if they decline, they decline
@@faraz146 surely bro we would praise muslims like abdul kalam but if you are telling me aurangzeb was a good guy give me true facts for it this guy totally ignored the part were he killed sambhaji which such cruelty and this guy is praising him as a good muslim
Aurangzeb make subcontinent become superpower and also it was peak area was during Aurangzeb, he was tolerant to non muslim even they have hindu general in his mughal empire they demolished hindu temple for political because maratha rajput hindu revolt use hindu temple to against mughal, Don't forget he defeated british empire
@@criscrosxxx Indira gandhi killed many sikhs of Khalistan movement and even half destroyed sikhs golden temple.....so according to your theory she was killing those sikh people because they were non-hindus not because of joning Khalistan and protetsing with firearms?
@@JakirHossain-EEE lmao acc to my theory ? im presenting literal facts . comparing indira gandhi case , she made sant bhindranwale the image and he turned rogue , nothing to do with "sikhs"per se. unlike wazir khan who killed sahebzades for not accepting islam at the ages of 5 and 9 .
13:11 "Jain and Hindu temples were entitled to Mughal state protection..." You mean after they paid jiziya tax for refusing to convert? 13:45 "In actuality, Aurangzeb destroyed at most a dozen temples". You conveniently make that sound so cute. How would you react if just 2 muslim sites of worship at Mecca and Madina were destroyed because they don't fit someone's ideology?
Mughal invasions is huge tragedy of the subcontinent and glorification is even bigger tragedy. You are not understanding the pain of people who were killed enslaved and forcibly indoctrinated to their religion to avoid death. What is so great about their architecture? They built super expensive tombs just show off their brutal power. They destroyed temples which had records of history of this land. They destroyed the meaning of Valor in name of treacherous conquest. When you make a video glorifying an invader it means that you are endorsing a thug to break into your house and loot everything and on the top of that you are considered as a low life. So Mughals stole the freedom of choice to pursue the truth of exploration human existence which is the culture of this land by constraining it to borders of their politically motivated rigid religious doctrines. A day will come when this restriction will lifted and they would see themselves as any other human or life and start enmanicpating from there.
I am from Bangladesh. under Aurangzeb's rulership the subcontinent contained 25% of the world's GDP. He took Bengal from a swamp land into a rice exporting power and even today the exporting and logistics business of Bangladesh persists.
Thank your farmers not Aurangazeb.. your farmers mastered cultivating rice in rich delta's of padmavat River.. 25% percent of world's GDP!! How High are you bro!!
@freedom 4life What part of swamp do you not understand? YTes Chittagong already had ports and trade routs but he expanded it. And no, it was not the same. Before his time there was a decline. He helped bring India back to its height economically.
As a Muslim myself... i think i have to hear from both sides. I feel the hatred from some hindus to muslims, and I'm pretty sure it's happen for reason. I live in a country that used to be Hindu majority thousand years ago, now we're biggest muslim majority country.
It doesn't matter what he did how wealthy he was. The Sikhs have whole recorded history of Mughals. It's all about as emperor how he treated other people which was really cruel.
Thankfully, we don't have much of that narrative in Pakistan. I remember my nana (Maternal grandfather) telling me night stories of Aurangzeb and talk nicely of him.
No one in the world believes that Pakistan’s education system has a stance even remotely less biased than India’s. India’s schooling is a hundred times less biased than Pakistan’s. My evidence for this is that india survived for 75 years before being taken over by ret-arded religious fanatics, while Pakistan was always run by those people.
For those of u who don't know!lemme spill some facts! 1.he was a cruel ruler 2.he was forcing Islam on Hindus (when the Hindus started opposing his views he stared there execution (guru teg bahdur is the most prominent example)) 3.he destroyed temples and other non Islamic monuments. 4.he maybe a good warrior but was a Not at all a good diplomat that's why the Mughal empire started declining during his ruling period. 5.and this for all the Muslims out there who demands secularism in India! Wtf there is extremist mentality in the gulf region why don't u declare those country secular!!!? This channel is running an anti hindu agenda by not disclosing the whole fact! One more fun fact some so called Islam protector were saying that we love representing India through mughal architecture (lmfao)we weren't the one who destroyed the first ever university i.e nalanda (that was also a guy from ur peaceful religion) Go read some history first !
May Allah have mercy on all passed Muslims, I was interested about Aurangzeb Alamgirs' biography one fact is that he never ate beef and fasted most of his life time. He never used a luxury life style like other rulers he ate regular food saying " If my citizens eating bread and water why should I eat differently". He was a pias and strong religious leader. May Allah grant him with Jannatul Firdavs. People believe everything that they hear from media unfortunately. But I encourage people to do their own research from credible sources.
Don't understand how you tell aurajzeb so good he killed his own brother own father and he killed shivaji maharajah brother Sambhaji Raje was mercilessly killed, reportedly by tearing him apart from the front and back with 'Wagh Nakhe' ('Tiger claws). His eyes were gauged out as he kept on praising Lord Shiva. He was beheaded with an axe.
I love how he conveniently dismissed everything even slightly bad about aurangzeb: He killed all his brothers (it was a big harem) including Dara Sikho who was choosen as heir apparent by the King himself. This was horrifying to the normal folks, this Persian concepts of Barbarity are not native to the Indian mindset. He killed a lot of Hindus but that alright because they were of different castes? Is that an excuse for manslaughter? He killed a Sikh Guru but thats also a fake account. He keeps talking about sources. What sources, the ones employed to be written by the Mughal dynasty's patronage itself. Please stop this comparison. Being a good muslim and a good ruler is not the same.
Bruh according to them every muslim person is pure there will be no wonder if some muslim preacher came on utube and say Osama bin laden was a good person cause he used to read namaz 5 times and had beard live simple life.😂
He is the only emperor who is present in current affairs more than history. He ruled akhand bharat(undivided India wet dream of hindu nationalist😂) for 50 years n kicked their so called district rulers like anything n fun fact is they also know it thats why they are so enraged. He'll go down as a GOAT EMPEROR ❤️ in the history subcontinent ever. JazakAllah khair from Hind 🇮🇳
How was India under Muslim rule? "Until 1000 AD, India's economy was a subsistence economy with GDP per capita just above subsistence level, and with no GDP growth between 1 and 1000 AD (Hindu era)... By the late 17th century, most of the Indian subcontinent had been reunited under the Mughal (Islamic) Empire, which for a time became the largest economy and manufacturing power in the world, producing about a quarter of global GDP." - Historical Statistics by Professor Angus Maddison >India was the world's superpower under Muslim rule. How was India under British rule? How is it today under Hindu rule? ~Share if you like this :) - 341
0:53 he's Arnab...most corrupt journalist... people here in india mock him as "GULLU" He doesn't even deserve to be quoted here...No one believes him.... Anyways lots of respect for you from 🇮🇳
Aurangzeb introduced jizya which was abolished by his father. I am sure Aurdrey didn't mention this in her book and so many other points because she was busy white washing his characters
jizya is a tax required by every nation with a ruling muslim majority. There's nothing wrong with jizya because in the exchange of service to the muslim army, non muslims just have to pay a tax. Just like how modern countries do today with their populations.
@@zarwa6725 first of all India is not a muslim majority yet so even then India was not a muslim majority. Definitely it is right from the perspective of a muslim . The point is Audrey tuskey is a hinduphobic women . She didn't mentioned jizya bcoz she didn't wanted to show that aurangzeb was discriminating b/w Hindus and Muslims. Even Allah descriminate b/w muslim and non muslim why won't his followers do.
@@theyoungwolf4381 india was not muslim majority yes but the country's rulers were. every country taxes people who dont serve in the army. muslims were forced to be drafted, non muslims werent. hence the tax, thats what jizya essentially is. tax to the military. not unfair, many countries do the same today
@@zarwa6725 who told there were no non muslim in Aurangzeb army. Check who was commander of Aurangzeb Army. All I am saying is he was disciminatiory ruler. It is justified for him to be discriminating as he was a muslim and even Allah is discriminating towards muslims and non muslim so it was expected from him.
Forget how cruelly he killed non-Muslims who refused to accept Islam or Jizya. He was the one who imprisoned his own father and did not provide him with adequate water and food, not to mention that he killed and served his own brother's beheaded head to his father lol. To be honest, I am not even an Indian, but please stop glorifying his tyrant.
Salam! Before scrolling through the comments be sure to subscribe to our channel and hit the bell so you don't miss out any of our future content. Enjoy the video.
Galat, There was nothing called Mugal.
Official name of so called Mugal Empire is "Riyasat E Hingdoostan ریاساتِ ہندوستان" in Persian and "Mamlakat Al Hindia مملكة الهندية" in Arabic.
And From Arabic Hindia modern term "India" evolved via latin..
If modern Indians really hate Ghori to Bahadur Shah Jafar's rule then they have no right to claim over "Hingdoostan"
@@penonnew8753 I just searched “Mamlakat Al Hindia” but I don't see anything you claimed
Waaswrwb! The glaring evidence of Aurangzeb's tolerance is standing right in the Capital city - Aurangabad (named after Aurangzeb) of the then Mughal empire as the "temple" of Khajuraho riddled with nude and vulgar sculptures in utterly inhumane and disgraceful sexual acts involving animals and orgies.
Had Aurangzeb not been "exceptionally" tolerant, why would this thousands of years old temple survive in Aurangabad??? 🤔
Please make part 2 as well
@@penonnew8753 source : from outside milkyway galaxy
"No one is more hated than he who speaks the truth"
- Plato
When Truth is twisted then that’s another matter altogether
True
@@mentor24x7 only one name Salman rushdie
Yeah this guy knows more truth then the people lived in the place where the incident happened ryt?.... idiots
Hitler is pretty hated. He must have been speaking truth through his ass.
I recall Aurangzeb subtly mentioned as the worst mughal emperor from history books whereas Akbar was mentioned as one of the greatest. I read Aurangzeb killed his brothers but the books choose to skip the mughal legacy of brothers fighting for the throne.
Bro,I've read about it in my history books 😑
Do pay atention
Thier is Common thing to killing own Brothers For Throne in Every Empire, in hindu Raj too.
@@shazainbaloch2538 may be yes, but we don't praise them as aurangzeb..
@@shazainbaloch2538
In lslamc world it is very very common, they kill each other, they marry there own sister, halala etc. Very very very common.... !!!!!
But in Bharat it is brutal act even in
ancient Bharat.
It is land of God Ram.
@@jakejohn1256 he is invader for us same as Britisher. He is outsider for us. can you do our hindu king praise in your land...
Aurangzeb killed 3 of his brother
Ultra right wing - he was evil
Ashoka the great killed his 101 brothers
Same people - what a humble and down to earth leader
It is fake propaganda spread by left-wing historians like Narul Hasan, Maulana Abul Kalam Azad.
Madrasachaap ashoka have only two brothers 😂
@@ChanchalOjha-ym5io according to Mauryan records he had dozens of brothers,most of whom were killed by himself
@@BarlasofIndus again madrasa knowledge 🤣
@@ChanchalOjha-ym5ioso where is your knowledge 😂
I love the fact that he picked specific portions and made him seem like a good ruler
he made the point that he is ruler not good or bad. A ruler who ruled to preserve his authority. If you can't get that then we know where the bigotry is
@@motei1853 he didn't talk about jizya tax which was a additional tax to be paid by Hindu if they didn't want to be converted he also didn't mention how he betrayed Shivaji and his son Sambhaji he forcefully killed Banda Bahadur and his 4 year old son.
Did he mention any of this?he just mentioned the points where aurangzeb was portrayed as a grey character. This is a common fallacy called half truth half lie he is only telling points which fames him not the points which clearly mention him as a cruel unjust ruler
@@motei1853why didn't he mention about the massacres mass r*pes and s*x slavery of non Muslim women during aurengzrb's rule.
Jizya tax is equal to zakaat that Muslims pay in Islamic state ,you can call it Muslims jizya
@@MohammadIzhaanKhan jizya tax isn't equal to zakat.but greater and arbitrary
You mentioned Guru Teg bahadur only , why not his successor Guru Gobind Singh (his son ) and 4 of his sons ... Out of them 2 were teenagers who were murdered brutally by Aurangzeb ...
Good,for comments 👍 against this false propaganda
Yeahhhh ..... Videos like these are nothing but shun with use of half knowledge
They where not killed by aurengzeb sab kuch Aurangzeb pe dal do sikhs se puri history distorted hai.aurengzeb ke under sikhs aur hindu b the unko convert nhi kiya usne kabhi forcefull tumhre guru ko kiya aur kashmiri brahmins ko mai khud kashmiri hu.history ko change karna brahmin ka he kaam hai.
@@victor4002 agar history change karna BRAHMIN ka kam hota toh beta
Aaj AKBAR aur AURANGZEB Brahmin hote.
@@victor4002 demographic change religion ke naam pe katle aam karna jhooth bolna tumhara kam hai.😜
I am from Punjab India after hearing your entire argument i feel that you had glorified him toooo much even from your argument it is proven he was an extremist person though I will say hindu vs muslim propoganda came way later in the conflict but he was no where perfect as u say why was so much revolt in his era ?????
Why did so many revolt against him to the extent he had fled when had 25 percent of the world's wealth and large land under his rule???
Why sikh revolted and when the concept of military and rule did not exist in Sikhism when it started when up to five generations of Sikhs never touched a weapon in their life ???
Was it just to imprison two children not even 10 in the tower with their grandmother and then carving them in the wall alive so this was your just king just trying to rule ?
What he was just a king blindly after more power no matter the cost
It is not about hindu or muslim but there is no dout in my mind about the converges as other wise there is no explanation to large muslim population in India for centuries even before British came we to the date remeber those who were forced to convert but they never covered in our religion text now don't say there were changed by British
To my conclusion most of hate between hindu and muslim today was due to British but this long you glorify was not as just as you say
If a Muslim speaks with British accent he/she is most probably a pakistani and most of them are jobless that's why they open Dawah channels on UA-cam.
Excellent
veer ji 🙏, the comment you've written is very much correct... but my request to you is please give an extra space between the paragraphs so that it can be read easily 🙏. people often don't read long and congested comments that's why....I request whoever is reading my reply to this comment please read the full comment before coming to any conclusion to the video 🙏.
@@saadbinrehman8186 hahaha 😂😂😂
@@SourabhSharma4584 Half of Pakistan's population already lives in Britain. I am an ex-muslim from Afghanistan now a nomad in Europe. My Afghanistan is destroyed by extremism and Taliban but who destroyed Pakistan ?
Let them try to change history in books, but they cannot change the reality which already took place.
Oh yes everyone in India knows the reality 😂
Cope pajeeeeet
@@proudchamp9865 abdul got triggered 😂
Where are you spreading your Peace today 💣💥 ? Go get your 72 hOOrs Abdul
@@glarysouls1333 they know about reality but they are changing it for next generation because they cannot potray a good Muslim.
pajeettttt
In our india many Indian politicians use he’s name for gain vote 🗳️
Yes, but they dont lie about Aurengzeb, he was a terrible person...
Ashoka
Shivaji Maharaj
Chandragupta Maurya
Raja Raja Chola
Krishna Deva Raya
Rejendar Chola
Emperor Harsha
Emperor Vikramaditya
Kanishka I
Samudragupta
Kumargupta
I could go on...
Pandya Empire (4th century BCE - 1345 CE) - over 1700 years
Chola Empire (848 CE - 1279 CE) - 431 years
Satavahana Empire (230 BCE - 220 CE) - 450 years
Hoysala Empire (1026 CE - 1343 CE) - 317 years
Vijayanagara Empire (1336 CE - 1646 CE) - 310 years
Mughals around 200 years..
Understand before all the islamic invasions India had many kingdoms and empires.. Mughals were not so great, under Aurengzeb he and his kingdom were rich top in the world maybe, but all those welth were looted by Indian public, Under King Harsha people were rich, he use to donate gold and diamonds to people. (ref- Xuanzang ). That time period is known as "The Golden Age Of India".
@@kuruvansh8431 would you tell that present pm of india is looting India's people?
@@kuruvansh8431 true
Destroying one’s culture just to impose another is not right
Right this is a truly propaganda channel
Yeah u Indians should hear it now and stop supporting BJP in its Islamic culture destruction and genocide
Aurangzeb ordered to destroy every temple in chamba , himachal pradesh but brave king of chamba with some other kings opposed it and fought with Mughals and won. And people say Aurangzeb was good person
True
What happens if the culture is wrong?
2:20 yeppp he's so right!!! Mumtaz was so beloved to Shah Jahan that he made her born 14 children and she didn't just "passed away" . She died during her 14th delivery. Man why this world always shows them as so innocent!!! And Shah Jahan was so great that after his so called beloved wife's death he married his own young daughter just because he was attracted towards her daughter's physique!!!!!! Such a great ruler he was right people??? He destroyed Hindu temples. And not only one or two or three ....many many many temples which were of very great importance to our culture. These people are just sitting out of India and talking about our history???? India's culture has always been the Sanatan Dharma and it always will be . The Mughals, the English all were just invaders . Our culture and our history would always be Sanatan that's it.
@@KidsGaming7787 your best reply was WhatsApp University..mate ur names Android gaming what's more cringe then that..always turning a blind eye to the atrocities lol
@@user-hv6dw1ux9o These guys are so sick
@@KidsGaming7787 go deep inside the history history was not available on youtube go and read book written by historicans who described his cruelty
Kuch bhi bol rhe ho..🤣🤣 apni beti se kab shadi kiya wo ....jo muh me aaya bak diya 🤣
Or tumko bta du angrez divide and rule karne ke liye ye sara raita failaye the
Opposing and criticising the Hinduism, is
because of the insecurity of these people
towards their religion. But it's the only religion
which speaks of Vashudeva Kutumbakkam. Long
live Sanatan Dharma.
Jai Shri Ram❤️
Jai Shree Ram
Jai Sree Ram 😊
No one is criticizing Hinduism in this video. Kuch bhi.
You are the one that runs to Muslims in order to make your made up stories of a religion look superior, you guys have such an inferiority complex. The brother didn't even condemn Hindus and here you come blabbering. It's really pathetic and Shri ram is dead.
For someone who is interested in South Asian history, I find "India in the Persianate Age 1000-1765" by Richard Eaton a very good read. It gives historical unbiased accounts of what happened during these eras. People need to understand that the past were just turbulent times and people formed allies and enemies regardless of religion.We can't judge events based through modern context.
Some rulers embraced the plurality of South Asia and others took advantage of it. It was Hindu against Hindu. Muslim against Muslim. Hindu and Muslim against Muslim to gain favour and to gain territorial expansion. The Jizya tax was most likely levied during the beginning stages of the decline of the empire since corruption was starting to become common. He was the first Mughal ruler to do so and maybe out of necessity.
In another instant it was reported that he would execute non-muslims lest they convert. Other instances mention him patronizing Hindu Temples, providing land grants, monetary support. Non-Muslims either vilified him or called him benevolent. It was more about upholding treaties, stability, and territory than actual religion. That's what the book explains as the hybridization of both the Sanskrit and the Persianate world. If you play close attention to current North Indian/Pakistani cultures, you will exactly see those influences.
Mughals both took part in Hindu traditions as Islamic. They celebrated Diwali, Norooz, Eid, and other local festivals that reflect their environment and their heritage. They consulted with both Hindu astrologers and Muslim Clerics. Sanskrit scriptures were translated to Persian to give wider access. Historic India, just as South Asia now is a mosaic and a hybrid of many cultures that passed through. If you're South Asian then understand that our societies aren't simply black or white.
Sir I have a 2 questions
1. Why didn't you explain about re-imposing of jizya tax and imposing extra taxes on non-muslim traders by Aurangzeb
2.If Aurangzed was that good administrator, A perfect statesmen, A great religious being (who liked replacing others religious sites with mosques by going against the quran)then why did his empire started to fall apart after his successfull tenure.
Q1. Aurangzeb imposed Jiziya because he was a fundamentalist Muslim. He also damaged temples of regions where kings confronted him and refused to accept his rule, like Gyanvapi. On other hand he also built temples in regions governed by him and where he did not face rebellion.
Q2. How is Aurangzeb responsible for his successors turning out to be incompetent? When Alamgir himself ruled he expanded Hindostan's borders from Peshawar to Deccan. He was a conqueror and an abled administrator.
@@Kishori_Kripa not sure about the built part but his giving grants to temples and land for their construction is recorded in history.
Aurangzeb’s orders to harm specific temples is seen as symptomatic of a larger vendetta against Hindus. I don't think Aurangzeb has gotten an honest scholarship, either side has highlighted the part which favors them for agenda.
Because the failed end that how he failed as sir said he fought for political power .So when guru gobind singh ji left their Qila why he still killed everyone of them and even his young sons what crime they committed .
@@zaid_wani Q1.
-> So you say that non-muslim have to suffer and pay extra taxes only because their ruller is a muslim even if they serve in his army, Finance his invoasions and e.t.c.
->What part do I and other normal hindus have in the rebellion why did Aurangzed the secular distoryed my sacread sites in the name of crushing the rebellion
->And please don't cleansify him by saying that it was rule of law then .If 100 kings(Hindu, muslim,sikh and however) did these acts classify all of them as vicious, antagonistic,bigot and e.t.c in this perticular aspect.
->U say that akhbar is not a pious muslims because he removed the good jizya, was he an Anti-national (in right wing indian terminology).
Q2. He has a part in the fall of mughal empire because
*He wagged an unfruitfull war in the deccan for a quarter centuary(25years) and he has also failed at last in that war
*He has not handdled a single major rebellion in an efficient manner .All of his actions were only fuelling those rebellions which at last overthrowed the mighty mughal empire.
Note:-please don't cleansify him ,no one has a part in his actions (glorify other farsighted ,efficient rullers like akhbar, shah jahan(they were also muslims) and e.t.c to pramote religious harmony)
I thought there must be something in history about Aurangazeb that was intentionally skipped but after watching I am truly disappointed that whatever the Audrey gang claimed is nothing but the concoction of lies and misinterpretations.
1. Did Aurangazeb kill guru Teg bahadur? Ans- yes but they tried to whitewash it by making arguments like he just tried to destroy the armed rebellion.
2. Did he reimpose jizya on non-Muslims which was abolished by Akbar? Ans- still yes
3. Did he destroy Hindu mandirs ?
Ans- still yes but they tried to find out the intention of alamgir who killed all his brothers and imprisoned his own father .
Now let me tell u why the Muslim rulers destroyed Hindu and Jain temples again and again. Because temples are the centre of life of Hindus be it economic , educational or social everything revolved around temples. So they realised if they destroy temples normally whole system would eventually collapse.
How easily is he saying he destroyed a few thousand temples? Like that's a small number. Let me ask you how many mosques he destroyed? The whole video shows how all the bad things done by Aurangzeb were not that big deal, that's all. I can't believe he is even trying to justify killing of guru tegh bahadur, that is beyond shameful. You should be ashamed of yourself for glorifying such a monster.
Indian economy sbse peak pr thi uske kingdom mein or worldwide ameer country bhi . Infact use uski simplicity ke lie bhi jana jata hai ,use criticise krke kuch nai milna indian rich history ka part hai . I know hindu muslims ke beech mein differences the pr muslims ko blame krne se pehle indian kings ki history dekh lo itna class system caste system tha .
Ya its true what about destroying the tulja bhavani temple in Deccan by afzal khan one of his officers who then tore into pieces by chatrapati shivaji maharaj
@@kamnakanu505 Indian economy peak par thi kyunki akbar, jahangir, shah jahan jaise mahan emperors ne iske liye kaam kiya tha.. Bigoted aurnagzeb ne to poori economy aur military might khatm kar diya tha mughlas ka.. End me to uske paas apne soldiers ko salary dene tak ka paisa nhi bacha tha.. Ek aadmi jisne duniya ke sbse amir empire ko nanga kar diya deccan me fight krte krte usse bada chutiya badshah history me na huya.
@@kamnakanu505 india was also rich before muslim rule so that doesn't add up
@@pranavnishad4890 but yeh alegation ki sirf muslims ne hindu temple ko demolish kia yeh glt hai cholas pandyas ,rashtrkutas ka history bhi prhlo
Shiv or vishnu disciples bhi aps mein ladte rhe hai unho ne bhi ek durse ke temples demolish kiye hai . Aristocracy ke time pr hrr raja ka vision tha ki vo apni superiority bnaye. So plzz bnd kro mughal hate n all.
Okay so u should also tell how Aurangzeeb killed and what offer he gave to Sambhaji Maharaj (king of maratha empire).Also he didn't distroyed any temples right ?
So what about ajanta caves which was distroyed by Aurangzeeb he send over 1000 of men to distroy it still they failed to distroy it completely.U can't imagine how we hindus feel when we see our history and culture distroyed by mugal empires.
Also tell the story of Moinuddin Chishti sofi saint who used to slaughter cows in temples just to humiliate hindus.
@@thauthentic ofc isn't that obvious he conquered many parts of India which contain large amount of hindu population so having any hindu is no wonder.
@@thauthentic pls i beg u to search i am not lying i have visted ajanta caves my self and it's clearly distroyed.I don't hate muslims i admire akbar and tipu sultan but glorfying any person just cause he is from your relgion is not fair.We forgive u but it's not like u can change history.
@@thauthentic it's completely worthless to argue with u cause i am not talking here about relgion i am here talking about emperor who was not good.Also u have half knowledge
1.It was allaudin khilji to distroy nalanda university which stopped buddhism in India.Also nalanda university was made by hindu kind which was having holy text of all hinduism,buddhism and Jainism.So blaming hindus for it completely foolish thing.Also nepla has 81% hindu population
2.Zorastrian was also distroyed completely from Iran by muslim invader and hindu kings were the only one who gave them place as refugee.That's why India has largest population of Zorastrians.
3.Also u need to understand we live in moderm world with many relgions it's better to respect them.If u consider your relgion true it's good but u can't just throw on someones face cause it can lead your community bad impression,inharmony basically make u preachers.
4.I don't hate muslims it's just u can just make a ruler hero who distroyed many temples and was cruel.
@@thauthentic he was discussing about aurangzeb and you took this topic somewhere else. Whatever brahmins did to lower caste people or buddhist is not the topic. Aurangzeb destroyed temples and killed so many hindus. Imposed taxes on non muslim people. Converted so many hindus. Killed gurus. This all is not a lie ok. Don't just defend him.
@@thauthentic why are you changing the topic? We are talking about Aurangzeb why are you trying to point out faults in Hinduism? Should I also point out faults in your religion? You people follow a man who consummated his marriage with a 9 year old girl, you people perform jihad to have 72 prostitutes in heaven. Why are you pointing out Brahmins, first tell me about your community.
This is untrue ....what is unjust ....a leader is responsible for all the atrocities......
He did damaged a lot of people lives.....
British Empire???
How violence against thousands of people who just wanted to practice there way of leaving on there land which they are doing since mankind evolve is being justified.
Tribute to our Gurus
(हिन्द दी चादर गुरु तेग बहादुर) who fought against the evil.
Jai chatrapati shivaji maharaj ❤️
Jay bhavani jay shivaji 🚩🚩
How about Modi? He's the cause why many muslims are suffering in india
@@timrasulov5678 May I ask you how would you summarise the India after 2014? Probably that it has grown intolerant. Guess what, the mainstream media is full of lies, break you bubble kid
@@timrasulov5678 Muslims are not getting hurt. Extremist are
Vai Shivaji to Alamgir se dar ta tha is liya Alamgir rehte maratha unpe hamla nahi kar paye.
I live in Aurangabad city which is named after Aurangzeb... But, the Hindu right wing govt changed the name of city recently
What is the new name
@@AbdurRashidRaskin from Aurangabad to sambhaji nagar who was a maratha ruler
Its a good thing . Imagine having a city named after hitler or churchill in india .
Good to see they changed it
@@glarysouls1333 another islamophobe great just please start to learn islam an then talk… please
How was India under Muslim rule? "Until 1000 AD, India's economy was a subsistence economy with GDP per capita just above subsistence level, and with no GDP growth between 1 and 1000 AD (Hindu era)... By the late 17th century, most of the Indian subcontinent had been reunited under the Mughal (Islamic) Empire, which for a time became the largest economy and manufacturing power in the world, producing about a quarter of global GDP." - Historical Statistics by Professor Angus Maddison
- How was India under British rule? How is it today under Hindu rule?
~Share if you like this :)
542
Mughal apologist. That doesn’t justify the atrocities committed by the Mughals
Btw, you forgot why buslamic invaders came to india in the first place .
It was the riches. Lol 😂
@@tvshowmemes-jt8eb just like any other empire the Mughals committed crimes but to say the Mughals were our to kill Hindus is a lie the Mughals made india rich and had no issue with Hindus they killed those who opposed the empire not targeting Hindus because they are Hindus!!!
okey before Mughals India was even more prosperous.
they came India because India was a golden bird .
they even don't know about anything about kala that's why they destroyed University and temple.
those Indian temples were not only for worship but those were educational centers and Those were heritage of India .
They were jihadi and converted Hindus forcefully.
raped women that why Women did johar
@@tvshowmemes-jt8eb there where few bad Apple but not All of them where bad many ancient temple remain to this day though it was under there rule
It's unreal to see a foreigner explaining stuffs about our history better than most Indian explainers could ever. He deserves a raise ❤
What a just king, even though his brother was going to split Aurangya into parts he just cut off his head and sent it to his imprisoned father as a gift, truly humble👍🙏
😂😂😂
Yeah now some mf will comment here sayind prajett
How many brothers did ashoka killed ??
@@musa7955 yeah one is here!
@@musa7955 99 half brother and one more. but for indian pajet৳s Ashoka like their father 😂they dont know why they did this. even most of the Emperor did this thing.
Jazakallahu Khairan for this video, really important this☺️ as an Indian muslim 🇮🇳
@Gangeyan Stop being selective and bring full facts of destruction of Kashi temple. If it has ever been destroyed. In those times Kings were not bigots like Modi of today. They rewarded equally whether Hindus or Muslims for loyalty to King and punished indiscriminately whosoever rebelled against the King.
@Gangeyan There are 7.7 millions Hindus in Pakistan and they love Pakistan. Only in Indian Media they want to leave Pakistan
@@TajamalGhumman yeah yeah...! all those dead Hindus in Pakistan are watching u stating this.
@Gangeyan A few month ago your Zealots burned Masjid and homes of thousands of Indian Muslims in capital Delhi. No sane person would like to visit a country where even Capital is engulfed in civil war and were Hindutva mobs can do anything with help of establishment and police. Propaganda of becoming so called Vishv Guru will not work longer. Hindutva mobs will expose Indian sooner than later. Its already Rapistan and lynching-Stan what next?
@@TajamalGhumman yaah bro you are correct
You saw right how many temples he built
We were wrong for just seeing the (physical evidences of domolished temples)
And please can you name a bunch of temples built by great aurangzeb
My memory is a bit cloudy
"Aurangzeb" a name that is still nightmare to saffron terrorists.
Yes read about how under his regime two young kids of 5 and 9 baba fateh singh and baba zorawar singh killed for not accepting islam . Nightmare it is to remember such a regime of islam
@@criscrosxxx source--?? republic TV??
@@sahil-yf4bs 😂😂😂
@Shiv Inder Singh
5 years old named as "baba" ? 😂🤣😂
@@FaizanKhan-um6bn unlike how a prophet who married a girl of age 7 is Respected , baba fateh singh was actually stood up against islamic oppressors at a tender age .
The FACT that it was under a Muslim King that India was at its peak really annoys these Hindus 😂
India's "Golden Age" is generally considered to be the Gupta period, which lasted from around 320 CE to 550 CE. During this time, the Gupta Empire achieved unprecedented prosperity and cultural achievements. The Gupta era is often referred to as a high point in Indian civilization and is regarded as a time of peace, stability, and prosperity.
Mughals were rich because of the same reason why British East India Company was a billion dollar company - LOOT. Both of them looted Indian people through different means.
Under Guptas, cholas, Vijayanagar people were rich
Under Aurengzeb- He was rich and some officials who worked for him, not General public.
☪️huslim talking about prosperity after having 10 kids and failed states like afghanistan syria iraq pakistan niger somalia🤡🤡🤡
Muslims are also very annoyed that Iraq was more free under usa than islamic dictatorship
Peak for what lol
India is no 1 country in gdp from 1 to 15 century.
Ohh.. where is mughal empire
Ohh it's in 16th century lol
India is having golden period before maughal Empire too..India and Africa were the having great resources.. Islamisation and colonisation was the problem that made India poor.. don't worry we will reclaim everything again soon..
They may spread propaganda and enforce their bigoted laws but Allah has separated truth from falsehood. May Allah guide the truth seekers.
Could not agree on that more
Ameen
Abe allah dekha bhi hai kisi ne aaj tak 😂😂😂
@@thenomadindian4145ofo I've never seen you but I think you exist, right?
@@makkialqaosain8872 i have never seen pedophile prophet , but i think he exists , isnt it ? 😂😂😂
He murdered his REAL Brother(but he was kind to hindus)
He imprisoned his REAL Father (he had his own brand of justice)
He slaughtered a peaceful protesting saint & destroyed 1000s of Temples (it was to preserve his understanding of mughal justice and extend control over India)
But he was not a bigot
May peace be upon him 😂😂😂😂😂
And they say people misunderstood islam
😂😂👍
Jisko mara wo uska saga bhai nhi tha
Apne baap ko jail me is liye dala kyuki wo 1 black taj mahel banwane ja rha tha or jiski wajah se india ki economy pe bht asar padta ..
King ashoka ne apne 99 bhai ko mara raja banne ke liye ja ke history utha pahle
@@arqamhanfi5683 @Arqam Hanfi bhai agar ban jaata toh burhanpur bhi aagra hota aaj soch kitne tourist aate (ebony or ivory ho jaata) 7 wonders mein se 2 apne hote tu bs soch mere bhai
Ah yes. The Muslim Skeptic mentioned this woman in a short, and how Hindutva critics wanted to go after her for her publications. (BTW, share the Muslim Skeptic's "The Curse of Polytheism." It's a fantastic watch, and a potential weapon against the Hindutva.)
and a potential weapon against the Hindutva.)......"
You Won't Succeed No Matter How Hard You Try. btw , Days of Islam Are Almost Over.
Weapon??...arab is destroying your own jihadism.. slowly and steadily.
yeah curse of polytheism video is a must watch for every sane hindu if there are any
@@glarysouls1333 cry more
@@glarysouls1333 we Muslims do not create war, we react to what the world is trying to put upon us, ie Islamophobia. There is no cumpulsion in religion. But it's also said Fight those who fight you. So the dawah going across the globe is reactionary to the circumstances today.
Anything wrong with that?
From Wikipedia - in November 1675, he was transferred to Delhi and asked to perform a miracle to prove his nearness to God or convert to Islam.[39] The Guru declined and three of his colleagues, who had been arrested with him, were tortured to death in front of him: Bhai Mati Das was sawn into pieces, Bhai Dayal Das was thrown into a cauldron of boiling water, and Bhai Sati Das was burned alive.[39] Thereafter, Tegh Bahadur was publicly beheaded in Chandni Chowk, a market square close to the Red Fort.[39][41]
Aurangzeb, a man of justice.
this is just a lie thatw as told 120 yrs before teg bahadurs exercution in all sources even in persian sources says he was kiled due to his looting and mutiny in punjab
stop lieing the world knwos teg bahdur never saved hindu kashmrii pundits this is just later properganda from hindus and sikhs
@@kazirahman-bw7cn so aurangzeb was right in forcefully coverting hindus to muslims
if they resisted, just kill them right ?
@@kazirahman-bw7cnblud triggered. Stop disrespecting our guru. What if we called ur prophet a child raper
@@kazirahman-bw7cn You do your research properly bigot
He killed Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur for stopping him from forcefully converting Kashmiri Hindus. There is a Gurudwara in Chandni Chowk. Anyone who wants to know how cruel Aurangzeb was must visit that place.
wrong madeup story that is was forcefuly converting hindus for todays political narrative
@sohel shaikh u are not even Indian 😂🤣 forget about judging.
Bro im kashmiri I'm getting this news for the first time, Alhumdulillah we were brahmins & became muslim because Islam makes sense ask any kashmiri hindu how kashmiris majority became muslim.
@@harismushtaq7526 we don't need to ask them, we already know that those Kashmiri Pandits were forced to convert. All these are recorded in real Kashmir files. Alhamdulillah, Jai Matadi.
@@chiranjibihasnu4910 lmao, kashmiri files is an exaggeration, plus I'm talking when most of the kashmiris converted to islam about centuries ago. At that time we had a hindu raja.
India was the most prosperous under moghul rule. Even now moghul history brings in billions in tourism and merchandise.
Tumhe tunhra baap kon hain pata nahi or bate history ki kr rahe ho
@@siddhantpatil3578 leave it out the moghuls put india on the map and civilised the place prior to that people were running round naked and throwing widows on the funeral pyre of their husband burned to death alive.
@@jimmykahn5431 mughal are tha chutiya log who thaught because of them india was civilized .
@@siddhantpatil3578 humlog Marriage karte hain. Bina Marriage ke koi ladki ke paass nahi jaate. Tumlog to apni biwi ke alawa har jagah mu marte ho.
Adultery or fornication is prohibited in Islam.
Ye to hame poochna chahiye tujhse ke Tera baap kon hai.
Saale tumlog to har jagah mu marte ho
@@jimmykahn5431 go and read about Ashoka the great kid than you will know. Islam is an ignorant religion. By invasions you spread your religion and still talks about peace ☮️😂. You guys are lucky that our faith tell us about to respect others religion or else there will no evidence of Islam left in the World
Aurangzeb rahimahullah was a great king.. Love to him from Kashmir
Salaam brother
@@tabindawaheed2643 wa alaikum salam sister .. Aes che preth jaayi.
@@Saarimul_masloolUnapologetic mai nai expect hi nahi kya tha ki bai vuchowe tohi bayi brother
@@tabindawaheed2643 Chalo coincidence.... Az che dohas aasaan sirf ye mai dawah video wuchaan neet exam maklov otre.... Be osus nimazi wa aai orai..
@@Saarimul_masloolUnapologetic chalo Rabb karnew kamyaab, dua karzew sister ke liye
I saw all the Hindutva radicals getting triggered in the shorts version so it made me want to check this video out. Nice work .👍
They are so icky omg 😂😂
There's nothing radical about getting infuriated about true past.
ua-cam.com/video/ohMw2oNTkMI/v-deo.html
Above are the deeds of Aurangzeb and Mughal brothers
Lol. I saw the names of the first few angry comments and instantly knew it was a bunch of triggered hindus.
@@Zzucia That's like telling Jews they weren't killed by the Nazis and expecting them to be cool about it.
@@theforgottenhistory8450 but are hindus literally going to any video that praises Islam and make fun of it ok? Tell me and also more muslims are being killed my modi and yet people care about that part
Now the foreigners gonna teach/tell what we (indian) have been through, that's great 🙏...
Because indians , with majority Hindus, will twist the narrative to their advantage. Also, I don't think there's a law in India that says foreigners can't learn Indian history and comment about it.
@@unmouscat no, if that were the case, you wouldn't have been even allowed to set foot in India. I see you want to relate everything with your religion. That's not what actually Quran taught. Quran teaches to respect other's religion. It teaches to respect that person who has saved even 1 life, and despise that who has killed even 1, yet even as a Muslim yourself, you are forgetting the narrative. As time changed, your definitions of kafir also changed. I hope for the best and I also REALLY hope you stop glorifying hitler soon. You never know.... 😌
twisting is pakistani habit not indias@@unmouscat
Whatever the case maybe, you can't torture and subjugate the people of today based on centuries old issues.
As a Hindu I cant agree more
Killing people will be bad thougout world timeline
Well you shouldn’t but if that ideology still exists you have to resist it and fight against it.
What Aurangzeb was a true Muslim nothing more nothing less.
He considered his brother kafir, killed him not because he wanted to but because Islam says so.
He killed many Hindus/Christians/Sikhs not because they were up in arms against him, but just because they practiced a different religion they were given an option either convert or pay a tax for protection and if you can’t do both, You DiE.
Not because he liked it but because Islam says so.
This ideology is still rampant in India.
Many are bruised and extinct
And we Hindu will not go silently into the night
He is heroes of Muslims, Muslims still follow this fanatics.
I'm from Aurangabad, the place where aurangzeb's tomb is located
In 1679 Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj protested against Jizya tax, Shivaji Maharaj in a letter to Aurangzeb wrote: I have learnt that because of your wars against me your treasury is exhausted So, you have decreed that Jizya be collected from the Hindus. Your ancestors Akbar, Jahangir and Shah Jehan could have also levied the Jizya but they rid their hearts of bigotry because they knew all men, high or low, were created by God and they represented various religions. Hence, their prosperity increased and they were successful. In your reign, the army is uneasy, traders unhappy, Muslims cry and Hindus seethe with anger. You have lost many forts and provinces Since I shall not desist from inflicting more devastation you will lose the rest, also!
Such insecure comments can only come from lindus 😂. Every Mughal Emperor faced resistance, be it from Hindus or Sikhs. No other Mughal Emperor managed to capture the vast land that Aurangzed Captured. Shivaji was defeated and had to escape with the help of locals 😂. Looser 😂
Muslims also have JAKAT that time
Read :-(Aurangzeb the Myth)
It's like resisting paying gst today,, no government or rule can run without tax money,, Muslims had to pay zakaat and non Muslims jizya
Nothing to do with bigotry. Previous Mughal kings not following correctly. Emp. Aurangzeb was following rules in this case.
So you want depend on only muslim tax(zakat)?
Instead of memorising whole Qur'an
He should have thought not to destroy others temples and sentiments
What made him Controversial ?
For a start - he came to the throne after imprisoning his father and having his older brother assassinated.
And in comparison with other Mughal rulers, he fared badly - his great-grandfather Akbar was described as the benign secular ruler, grandfather Jahangir was known for his love for art and architecture and father Shah Jahan was the great romantic who built the Taj Mahal.
But Aurangzeb, the sixth emperor and a devout Muslim, was often described as a ruthless tyrant who was an expansionist, imposed tough Sharia laws and brought back the discriminatory "JIZYA TAX" that Kaafirs had to pay in return for protection. And the Poor Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, and Zoroastrians (Persians) who couldn't pay taxes converted to Islam just so they can stay safe. All the Muslims in India you see today have Non-Muslims Lineage.
He was also described as someone who hated music and other fine arts, and ordered the destruction of several temples. What a Saint 🤡
Madrasachap Historians trying to Rewrite History LMFAO. Ever heard of Mauryan or Chola empire. What about Vikramaditya ? Your Islamic Poets mentioned him to have Ruled the whole Arabic Peninsula. A Whole Era was named after him. Battle of Haifa Go Brrrrrrrr.......
This comment section remind me of a Rural WhatsApp Group.
Cope Buslims.
Lol vikramaditya? When you lindus didn't achive something great you create an imaginary history 😂😂😂
@@danbar3440 Only one invalid Counter
what about others ?
🤡
Mald Seethe Cope Harder Average Labrahamic Mleecha Existential Crisis Larper🤲
@@danbar3440 what is so great that was achieved by Aurangzeb that was not achieved by Jahangir or Akbar? People did admire Sher Shah Suri the one who's currency rupiya is still in use in the Around Indian Subcontinent. Glorification can't happen just because he was Mughal emperor. Again invasions always result in destruction of details and who to know better than Mughal emperors who invaded and destroyed ancient temples and monasteries? Simple I don't emphatize with people who blindly beleive the stories on Hindu greatness but I reckon that's what is being done here too.
Source?
@@farheenafroz1028 Unbiased History (Definitely not Madrasachap) 🤡🤲
What is this Videos Source ? 😂
Bunch of Buslims trying to Rewrite History LMFAO
I loved the ignorance in comments without knowing the history ....
Keep it up you guys have long way to go
Well why do people in india hate aurangzeb but not other mughal emperor that much . Think of it there should be a reason right. It's because of aurangzeb cruelty towards hindu . I am not that of religious guy but it's a fact that he killed many hindu and destroyed temples .
2:28 bro literally said Aurangzeb made Taj Mahal
@@agentpoindexter3383 so what
Many people don't even care abt it tbh
@@iamuzumakianduchiha776 he caused a genocide of hindus in medieval India
Up until the the rule of Chhatrapti Shivaji Maharaj, in the muslim ruled India, 437 hindus died every day due to the genocide
Chhatrapati Shivaji Mahraj fought against this genocide
Who's great now?
@@derkonig2292 👍 brainwashed muslims, he literally gave you guys wrong information, i am not surprised he is doing that , afterall this is a islamic channel
Very interesting video, I believe that Zafarnama written by Govind Singh was the pivotal moment of his reign ending, due to bricking alive the two songs of Govind.
Mughlas were mad that's why Aurangzeb bricked to children
Can you please explain what you want to say because
What else can we expect from a channel like yours
AND also from gobar bhakt like you
This is the real history and biter truth that many of them couldn't able to accept...
here are some more information for you:
Forced conversions: Aurangzeb was known for his religious zealotry and enforced Islamic law strictly. He imposed the jizya tax on non-Muslims and prohibited them from holding high offices in the government. He also ordered the destruction of Hindu and Sikh temples and forced many Hindus to convert to Islam.
Execution of his own family members: Aurangzeb had his own brother Dara Shikoh executed, along with his sons and other family members, in a bid to claim the throne. He also imprisoned his father Shah Jahan for the last eight years of his life and did not allow him to see the outside world.
Brutal treatment of Sikh Guru Tegh Bahadur: Guru Tegh Bahadur, the ninth Sikh Guru, was executed by Aurangzeb in 1675 for refusing to convert to Islam. The Guru's followers were also brutally tortured and killed.
Intolerance towards other religions: Aurangzeb was known for his intolerance towards other religions, including Hinduism, Sikhism, and Jainism. He ordered the destruction of many temples and persecuted religious leaders who did not conform to his strict interpretation of Islam.
Economic policies: Aurangzeb's economic policies were also controversial. He raised taxes to finance his military campaigns, leading to widespread poverty and famine in some parts of the country.
Then how Hindu warriors conquer And beat mughals this history should Alps be taught in Islamic countries right ?
@@Unknowndadofyou islamic studies focus on the prophets mainly. Not what happened in other countries
@@Unknowndadofyou he isn’t talking about mugal conquest he is exposing the myths. Still mugals beat your kings that why he is controversial because you are jealous of aurengzeb he expanded his kingdom which no other kind did during his time gdp of his kindom was one third of whole world gdp. And your kings couldn’t evey do this
@@victor4002 before the mughals came we had bigger gdp
After using two of his brothers to sabotage Dara, he killed those two brothers too, you unknowingly missed to mention or was it strategically excluded in your video?
If he was so great why did he charge jaziya from non muslims and intentionaly demolished thousands of hindu temples.😅
6:15 He placed his father under house incarceration because his father was lavishly spending the state’s treasury on The construction of extravagant monuments.
6:37 He banned music because it is Haraam in Islam.
May Allāh forgive and reward him
I like the way you present, it was informative. But I see a sense of biased inclination and trying to justify some bad events doesn't help in seeing this in a neutral way.
If you look at a question... Why Akbar was respected where as Aurangzeb hated?
As per my view this video is incomplete!
Well Akbar was a people pleaser and aurangzeb was a purpose driven Nan
@@sheiruto1058 Yeah and his purpose was to suppress Hindus.....
😎Now start saying,so what,we had given you 2 chances.. either pay Jizya tax or gets converted otherwise 🗡️⚔️
He's a blind proud muslim, devoutly following the al-taqiya concept of Islam, what else did you expect?
Because Akbar was a hypocrite and from Muslims perspective, an enemy of Islam
Exactly
Jai Chatrapati Shivaji Maharaj 🚩🚩🚩🚩
Shut up
Chapathi taste nice with beef gravy.
@@temasek65 eat with pork
Koi kuta bhi nahi puchata tara jhatpupati ko
Masha Allah ❤️
May Allah bless you ,love from India 🇮🇳.
May Allah's piece and blessings be upon Aurangzeb Alamgir Rahimahumullah.
Yes we need to calm down he was a good man...who cares if he ordered genocide of Hindus...We Hindus exist to suffer. Now you will agree with me! And as a matter of fact Learn about Gupta Empire,Mauryan Empire and Chola empire, Mughals were no where close to them. And the original Indian architecture made by them is still un matchable.
not only that but he also oppresed sikhs tooo. they never mention that and how he gave orders to kill chote sahibzaade who were 5 and 7
Know That Pain Bhakt
U always 'Taj Mahal' to the entire world though.
When did he said he was good?
He said he wasn’t perfect at all
The mugals did not even dare to fight with Cheras,cholas and pandias that is why his map does not included tamil Nadu and kerala
The Most controversial and Best Indian Ruler Till Date.
Nice joke 😂
Joke
@@glarysouls1333 keep crying
@@gaggii8078 keep crying
@@rashidsalis619 triggered ? 😂
No wonder people from peaceful community are so misguided
He was a great king who lived simple life and never used a single rupee from the treasure or people's money for his daily bread instead he used to sew prayers mats, caps and used to write copies of Quran by his hand and sell them in the market and auction. Many people don't know that he was a first ever Mughal or Muslim king who had the largest number Hindus soldiers ever. Almost 35% of army was based on Hindu commanders and soldiers. 25% world's GDP and wealth was in the control of india, he created more than 135 temples for hindus. Some of them still have copy of his charity papers. As per the authentic historic references he demolished only 2 temples and 1 mosque because of thr solid reasons behind them. India was the richest and largest nation during his reign. But still many corrupt, communal amd extremist put false blames on him.
jizya tax says hi
The amount of misinformation
Was the Nation Begging before Mughals came in?
No it wasn't It was the richest during chola's reign get u r bloody fact checked
Charity paper to muslim community
I strictly feel the need for Pakistan to arrange series on mughal empire to make people aware. It would be good if people knew the real story behind. I honestly hate people demonizing something rightful into a crime.
This is what I exactly thought and say all the time.
Everything you hear around you is a narrative influenced by knowledge, biases, perspective etc. The same is the case with this historian who has made hinduphobic comments in the past.
History is written by victors and no king will agree to publish the negative side of his rule. Every human has a good and bad side to him, the balance decides your character.
The author tries to just pick the good side. Accounts of atrocities have been termed as exaggerated by her as later addition. Then why can't the same logic be applied to the good part mentioned.
She says her role is to not be perfect but get the ball rolling forward. That's the most absurd thing to say for a historian. The role of the historian is to try to be perfect by trying to find the absolute truth. If the ball is rolled towards a narrative instead of the truth then you cannot call yourself a historian. You are now a "STORY TELLER"..
Hindus are now a much angrier bunch because they are tired of targeting and slandering done on their religion when on the contrary they have been accepting and tolerating for so many years. You will hardly find hindus meddling with the business of other religions or insulting them unless provoked.
Hindus and India is the only country that had sheltered majority of the prosecuted religion in the past when Christians and muslims were converting and plundering people of other faith.
Hindus don't hate Mughals except a few people with an agenda. We have made movies on them, it's just that the majority do not like aurangzeb for his atrocities on other faiths.
We have the 3 famous khan movie stars in india belonging to the minority community. How many people in Muslim and Christian countries support in such a way their minorities. Hypocrisy at its peak.
This is the irony.
Bro these guys think they know everything maybe they went into past and learned about it .
Yes
Correctly described...
Tell,these haters that how Mughals protected India subcontinent from Mongol invasion and Britishers.
Mughal empire was already dead by that time. It was the Marathas before the British
@@rishiphadnis1 Sultan Aurangzeb gave a lashing to the Brits in Mughal-Anglo war (1686-1690).
Remember, the colonialists (at the time, Portuguese) were already in India before Babur started his conquests.
@@the-wanderer-01 extremely common Aurangzeb W 💪😎☪
🤦🏻🤦🏻🤦🏻
lol mughal literally means mongol wtf do u smoke bro??
Q1 Did he destroy the temple? If he protected pls name it with reference
ua-cam.com/video/Ct8b6jOxYoc/v-deo.html
Rip logical and critical thinking
🙏🙏🙏🙏
🤓
@@ahmedaziz8660 💐💐💐 rip
@@prasadrakshe6309 ???
Average extremist
You didn't watch this video with a open mind and a open heart
May allah forgive you and may he take you to the right path
Stating facts has nothing to with critical thinking 🤦♂
You say that the "unjust killing of the ninth Sikh Guru" is often "exaggerated through conflicting reports" and therefore, imply, that the killing (Martyrdom in the Sikh tradition) was justified. Your claim is no better than your alleged conflicting reports.
You say that the "earliest sources" don't even elaborate on the Ninth Guru's peaceful protest against the forceful conversion of Kashmiri Brahmins into Daruslam by Aurangzeb. Did you not read "Bhat Vahi Multani-Sindhi" or "Bhat Vahi Talauda Pargana Jind", some of the contemporary accounts in the form of Bhat Vahi (written scrolls still preserved at the Punjab University Patiala)? Go and check them out. Did you not read Hari Ram Gupta's extensive work on the “History of the Sikhs” where he enumerates multiple examples of forceful conversions and fanaticism of Aurangzeb from other original sources: "Akhbar-i-Darbar-i- Mualla (The Royal Mughal Court News)", and "Kalimat-e- Tayibat", and "Ahkam-e-Alamgiri".
You say that Persian and the Sikh sources state that Aurangzeb had the Ninth Guru executed because of his "military opposition" to the Mughal interests that had caused civil unrest; and therefore his execution was justified. Would you justify the persecution and forceful removal of Prophet Muhammad from Medina by the powerful merchants because He was causing a civil unrest? I guess you don't. Similarly, what you call a civil unrest was the opposition by the Ninth Guru of the cruel fanaticism of a Mughal emperor by peaceful means. Secondly, this shows that you have not engaged with the original Sikh sources (some of them mentioned above). Did you not read the Pracheen Panth Prakash or Gurpartap Suraj Granth, two of the original Sikh sources, that clearly state the protection of humanity as the main reason why the Ninth Guru sacrificed Himself? Thirdly, there is nothing wrong with militarily opposing a tyrant. We, as Sikhs, are not only proud to have opposed the Mughal interests but to have eternally uprooted the largest Mughal dynasty South-Asia had ever seen; have you hear of Baba Banda Singh Bahadur (read Dr Ganda Singh’ “Life of Banda Singh Bahadur”, a work of monumental historical importance).
Yes, Aurangzeb was not perfect. But so weren't the merchants of Medina who persecuted Prophet Muhammad or Hitler who persecuted Jews or the RSS who are now persecuting the minorities in India.
All of the above shows that you are indeed a bigot who reads history selectively.
RSS is persecuting minorities? I think u have confused rss for bajrang dal which is an extremist organisation.RSS majorly focusses on cultural development and spread of knowledge about hinduism. RSS dosent even involve itself in political situations or displays of powers lol.
@@calamity3224Bajrang Dal, RSS or Shiv Sena or the current extremely intolerant government of India backed by the population with a majoritarian mindset. They all something in common: they all went to impose Hinduism on Sikhs, Muslims and Dalits just like Aurangzeb did back then. The proposition that RSS is cultural organisation spreading knowledge about Hinduism is laughable. That’s a highly dangerous organisation infiltrating the Sikh organisations under the patronage of the BJP in order to culturally assimilate them. Maybe that’s what you meant when you said that they spread knowledge about Hinduism .
All of your questions will be answers if you actually read and verify the facts given in the book Aurangzeb: The Man and The Myth.
@@FahadRather I’ll surely read that. But do read the original sources I have cited above. Far more comprehensive than the book you have suggested.
@@money5434 The incidents u gave me about forced conversions have been clarified in the book i suggested you. Their isn't any convincing evidence for forced conversions during Aurangzeb regime.
He was a true Muslim. Merciful for the believers and mighty against the disbelievers.
Sultan Salahuddin, Badshah Alamgir, Sultan Suleman they were the man, followers of the prophet Muhammad (sa). They established the Islamic law. We really miss them.
O Allah have mercy on their soul. You are the most merciful.
he was a bhikari and jahil who killed his own brother and jailed his father.
So u mean that If anyone says that i don't want to follow islam, that human should be cut in half thats a duty of a true muslim ? 🤔
@@humblereactions2467 no way
By that logic anyone who doesn't follow hinduism is also disbeliever! and In a country like India which is Hindu majority country anyone who doesn't follow hinduism should be killed right? Well, since this is the islamic way it should also be the same for hinduism, from now on I will never question a hindu killing a muslim because muslims are disbeliever in India and they should be killed.
@@humblereactions2467 No but if he says that *and* decides to become a threat to the muslims, then it is permissible to kill him by law.
This also goes for apostasy in Islam btw
Aurangzeb was so much coward that even sikh guru's children were threat to him and his religion. But children of guru Gobind and banda Singh bhadur were not coward like him. There were bricked alive but didn't converted to muslim. True Sikhs♥️
Statistics is the art of bending numbers for the result you want. This video reminds me of that. Well story telling is a story told by the teller. This was funny, and for that, I thank you.
One who killed his own brothers and father, destroyed n-number of temples.
the temples is devil worshipping bud .
British puppet spotted
Yesss, thank you for this ❤️❤️❤️
Aurenzaeb was one of the greatest leaders of India
💪🏻
🤣🤣🤣
I pray that you should get an great son,brother,life partner like Aurangzeb.
😂
Aurangzeb killed his brothers and father
Trueee
@@aryanminati so did Ashoka he killed hundreds
@Justtostudy lol we don't respect ashoka.... Buddhists respect him
actually I was thinking, why would this ruler, have hindus of the higher class, as his advisor even when he could just forcefully convert them,"hey you wanna be my advisor? be a Muslim or u be executed". or enticed them with luxury. doesn't make sense. that's why i believe he didn't.
Because they were the most educated ones with administrative skills. Even the British used Brahmins. Were they going to import tribesmen from Uzbekistan which is where the Mughals came from? They were essentially nomadic herders that conquered a weak but intellectual civilisation.
Because forcing people to Islam would be against the religion and that was one of the main things that Aurangzeb stood by. But you can try to convince and call to them but if they decline, they decline
Aragzaib alamgir May Allah have mercy upon him..
Why You praise Him?
I love Islamic history videos like this. Please make more.
Yaa videos based on half knowledge
@@sancharichakraborty7749 you Hindus get burned whenever history glorifies muslims😂
@@faraz146 if only they could speak the truth😂
@@faraz146 surely bro we would praise muslims like abdul kalam but if you are telling me aurangzeb was a good guy give me true facts for it this guy totally ignored the part were he killed sambhaji which such cruelty and this guy is praising him as a good muslim
His most trusted mility general was hindu king Maan Singh!
He was akbar's general not aurangzeb's
Most educated muslim on this topic be like:
@@thomaskennedy5728 bhakts ancestors on battle field in past - 🤡🤡🤡🤡
What Bhakts shows online what their ancestors were like - ☠️☠️☠️☠️.
😂😂😂😂
@@ACE-dc3yjOk pakistani we are gonna ignore what ur ancestors were in 1971 war
The only king of Mughal Empire who implemented Sharia Law ...❤❤🔥☝☝
Aurangzeb make subcontinent become superpower and also it was peak area was during Aurangzeb, he was tolerant to non muslim even they have hindu general in his mughal empire they demolished hindu temple for political because maratha rajput hindu revolt use hindu temple to against mughal, Don't forget he defeated british empire
And he caused the deaths of baba zorawar singh and fateh singh ji young kids of ages 9 and 5
@@criscrosxxx they killed for political use and he against mughal
@@criscrosxxx Indira gandhi killed many sikhs of Khalistan movement and even half destroyed sikhs golden temple.....so according to your theory she was killing those sikh people because they were non-hindus not because of joning Khalistan and protetsing with firearms?
@@JakirHossain-EEE lmao acc to my theory ? im presenting literal facts . comparing indira gandhi case , she made sant bhindranwale the image and he turned rogue , nothing to do with "sikhs"per se. unlike wazir khan who killed sahebzades for not accepting islam at the ages of 5 and 9 .
Ungrateful Lindu insects forgot it
13:11 "Jain and Hindu temples were entitled to Mughal state protection..." You mean after they paid jiziya tax for refusing to convert?
13:45 "In actuality, Aurangzeb destroyed at most a dozen temples". You conveniently make that sound so cute. How would you react if just 2 muslim sites of worship at Mecca and Madina were destroyed because they don't fit someone's ideology?
People criticized him for destroying Temples. What about those hindu kings who has destroyed 84000 buddist monestry?
Mughal invasions is huge tragedy of the subcontinent and glorification is even bigger tragedy. You are not understanding the pain of people who were killed enslaved and forcibly indoctrinated to their religion to avoid death.
What is so great about their architecture? They built super expensive tombs just show off their brutal power.
They destroyed temples which had records of history of this land.
They destroyed the meaning of Valor in name of treacherous conquest.
When you make a video glorifying an invader it means that you are endorsing a thug to break into your house and loot everything and on the top of that you are considered as a low life.
So Mughals stole the freedom of choice to pursue the truth of exploration human existence which is the culture of this land by constraining it to borders of their politically motivated rigid religious doctrines.
A day will come when this restriction will lifted and they would see themselves as any other human or life and start enmanicpating from there.
We need more history like this ,
history with no proof
History twisted for covering the sins
This history belongs to Indian people. Who are you guys to forgive him?
May a thousand more Aurangzeb be born again in Hind.
All of them will go straight to Pork Slaughter house if they do.
Unbelievable!!! People are admiring the most cruel Mughal emperor of all.
@Mughal Nationalist you probably have Mughal DNA in your blood after all your ancestors were probably rewarded with one night stands
@Mughal Nationalist so what??
I am from Bangladesh. under Aurangzeb's rulership the subcontinent contained 25% of the world's GDP. He took Bengal from a swamp land into a rice exporting power and even today the exporting and logistics business of Bangladesh persists.
Thank your farmers not Aurangazeb.. your farmers mastered cultivating rice in rich delta's of padmavat River.. 25% percent of world's GDP!! How High are you bro!!
@freedom 4life Before him their ancestors ate sandwiches later switched to rice 😄😁😆😀
@freedom 4life What part of swamp do you not understand? YTes Chittagong already had ports and trade routs but he expanded it. And no, it was not the same. Before his time there was a decline. He helped bring India back to its height economically.
" Either the throne or the grave " is in pashtun language
It’s the same exact meaning in Arabic too, a lot of Pashtun words adopted direct vocabulary from Arabic
@@alkha4711 yep
@@alkha4711 typical Pashtun slavish sidekick trait
As a Muslim myself... i think i have to hear from both sides.
I feel the hatred from some hindus to muslims, and I'm pretty sure it's happen for reason.
I live in a country that used to be Hindu majority thousand years ago, now we're biggest muslim majority country.
Any data regarding that...please justify your statements..Hindus are still in majority with a big margin..
Pakistan?
Pakistanis,not 1000 years only 75 years,come to real history 😂😂
Indonesia?
@@sumitmaran4858 Indeed
We completely agree with you..We are very much inspired by his simple life.
May you be blessed with a son like Aurungzeb.
@@kuruvansh8431 like chuhaji
@@MUSLIM.BOSS69this shows your upbringing. Desert filth
It doesn't matter what he did how wealthy he was. The Sikhs have whole recorded history of Mughals.
It's all about as emperor how he treated other people which was really cruel.
Mashallah may Allah give Sultan Aurangzeb the highest ranks in Jannah. ❤️💯
He is in hell bro
@@factual598 if he is you’ll be joining him soon son. 😂
Ameen
A man that imprisoned his old sick father and killed his brother should be given Jannah?
@@ZaheerAbbasKhan Allah is all forgiving mate 🤔
Thankfully, we don't have much of that narrative in Pakistan. I remember my nana (Maternal grandfather) telling me night stories of Aurangzeb and talk nicely of him.
No one in the world believes that Pakistan’s education system has a stance even remotely less biased than India’s. India’s schooling is a hundred times less biased than Pakistan’s. My evidence for this is that india survived for 75 years before being taken over by ret-arded religious fanatics, while Pakistan was always run by those people.
Terrorist likes terrorist
🤣🤣🤣 Pakistanis not living in a delusional world ..... impossible
You guys always take violence as a good thing. So no surprise here.
@@g.garg26 that's how they see the world
Can you name the sources used in this video?
His source: trust me bro😂
@@Agastyasharma9796Search it up. You can even find it on wikipedia. Lindus Sources for information shall always remain the Whatsapp University
For those of u who don't know!lemme spill some facts!
1.he was a cruel ruler
2.he was forcing Islam on Hindus (when the Hindus started opposing his views he stared there execution (guru teg bahdur is the most prominent example))
3.he destroyed temples and other non Islamic monuments.
4.he maybe a good warrior but was a
Not at all a good diplomat that's why the Mughal empire started declining during his ruling period.
5.and this for all the Muslims out there who demands secularism in India! Wtf there is extremist mentality in the gulf region why don't u declare those country secular!!!?
This channel is running an anti hindu agenda by not disclosing the whole fact!
One more fun fact some so called Islam protector were saying that we love representing India through mughal architecture (lmfao)we weren't the one who destroyed the first ever university i.e nalanda (that was also a guy from ur peaceful religion)
Go read some history first !
Pov:- you are hindu
*fake comment rejected*
ua-cam.com/video/9yARPq35lBw/v-deo.html
He killed anyone who rebelled against him . Muslims as well as Hindus. If he had hate against Hindus...he would not have Hindus in his court.
For anyone who doesn't know what "Deccan" is; it is the name denoted to the Indian peninsula, just like Apennine peninsula for Italy.
May Allah have mercy on all passed Muslims, I was interested about Aurangzeb Alamgirs' biography one fact is that he never ate beef and fasted most of his life time. He never used a luxury life style like other rulers he ate regular food saying " If my citizens eating bread and water why should I eat differently". He was a pias and strong religious leader. May Allah grant him with Jannatul Firdavs. People believe everything that they hear from media unfortunately. But I encourage people to do their own research from credible sources.
Hey Allah please leave earth so we can live peacefully
@@kamalnegi6663 people look at the mirror and hate the mirror interesting.
@@vaish5125 are you converted or real btw?
@@kamalnegi6663 I am a human being not Allah. You gotta contact him directly.
@@vaish5125 give his phone number
True 🎉🎉🎉❤❤❤
Love from BANGLADESH
Thank you for sharing this important information. It clears up a mess of confusion about what happened in islam in india.
its fake ok
There were wery less muslims before mughals . They converted peoples religion to islam.
Bro it is propoganda video not a single thing in the is true
@@animeboy4144 You are telling it to a Muslim 👹
Don't believe in influencer too much specially if they speaking only there own thoughts not history
Hazrat Aurangzeb Alamgir R.A 👑
Don't understand how you tell aurajzeb so good he killed his own brother own father and he killed shivaji maharajah brother Sambhaji Raje was mercilessly killed, reportedly by tearing him apart from the front and back with 'Wagh Nakhe' ('Tiger claws). His eyes were gauged out as he kept on praising Lord Shiva. He was beheaded with an axe.
Quran says to kill who worships idols
Many temples were destroyed by Muslim kings
And some Indian Muslim brothers say that aurangzeb is great
I love how he conveniently dismissed everything even slightly bad about aurangzeb: He killed all his brothers (it was a big harem) including Dara Sikho who was choosen as heir apparent by the King himself. This was horrifying to the normal folks, this Persian concepts of Barbarity are not native to the Indian mindset. He killed a lot of Hindus but that alright because they were of different castes? Is that an excuse for manslaughter? He killed a Sikh Guru but thats also a fake account. He keeps talking about sources. What sources, the ones employed to be written by the Mughal dynasty's patronage itself.
Please stop this comparison. Being a good muslim and a good ruler is not the same.
@@internet8080 which empires???
You should come and see destroyed temple and how maratha warriors battle to Aurangzeb 😡😡😡
Bruh according to them every muslim person is pure there will be no wonder if some muslim preacher came on utube and say Osama bin laden was a good person cause he used to read namaz 5 times and had beard live simple life.😂
Your P**isless Army Can't Protect Temple
Truth hurts 😂 .....love seeing these bakts getting offended 👏😂😂.... good job brother 👏
lol ur muslim bf waiting for u with a fridge
He is the only emperor who is present in current affairs more than history.
He ruled akhand bharat(undivided India wet dream of hindu nationalist😂)
for 50 years n kicked their so called district rulers like anything n fun fact is they also know it thats why they are so enraged.
He'll go down as a GOAT EMPEROR ❤️ in the history subcontinent ever.
JazakAllah khair from Hind 🇮🇳
How was India under Muslim rule? "Until 1000 AD, India's economy was a subsistence economy with GDP per capita just above subsistence level, and with no GDP growth between 1 and 1000 AD (Hindu era)... By the late 17th century, most of the Indian subcontinent had been reunited under the Mughal (Islamic) Empire, which for a time became the largest economy and manufacturing power in the world, producing about a quarter of global GDP." - Historical Statistics by Professor Angus Maddison
>India was the world's superpower under Muslim rule. How was India under British rule? How is it today under Hindu rule?
~Share if you like this :)
-
341
Alhamdullilah praises to god from India ☪️🇮🇳
0:53 he's Arnab...most corrupt journalist... people here in india mock him as "GULLU"
He doesn't even deserve to be quoted here...No one believes him....
Anyways lots of respect for you from 🇮🇳
Alhamdullilah for Islam
Aurangzeb introduced jizya which was abolished by his father. I am sure Aurdrey didn't mention this in her book and so many other points because she was busy white washing his characters
jizya is a tax required by every nation with a ruling muslim majority. There's nothing wrong with jizya because in the exchange of service to the muslim army, non muslims just have to pay a tax. Just like how modern countries do today with their populations.
@@zarwa6725 first of all India is not a muslim majority yet so even then India was not a muslim majority. Definitely it is right from the perspective of a muslim . The point is Audrey tuskey is a hinduphobic women . She didn't mentioned jizya bcoz she didn't wanted to show that aurangzeb was discriminating b/w Hindus and Muslims.
Even Allah descriminate b/w muslim and non muslim why won't his followers do.
@@theyoungwolf4381 india was not muslim majority yes but the country's rulers were. every country taxes people who dont serve in the army. muslims were forced to be drafted, non muslims werent. hence the tax, thats what jizya essentially is. tax to the military. not unfair, many countries do the same today
@@zarwa6725 who told there were no non muslim in Aurangzeb army. Check who was commander of Aurangzeb Army.
All I am saying is he was disciminatiory ruler.
It is justified for him to be discriminating as he was a muslim and even Allah is discriminating towards muslims and non muslim so it was expected from him.
Forget how cruelly he killed non-Muslims who refused to accept Islam or Jizya. He was the one who imprisoned his own father and did not provide him with adequate water and food, not to mention that he killed and served his own brother's beheaded head to his father lol. To be honest, I am not even an Indian, but please stop glorifying his tyrant.
It's just myth😂😂😂 it's not true brother you have been brain wash by some one
Yeah and he abolish 52 non jizya taxes
You shuld learn about hindu also. How they destroy buddhas and 84000 buddh temple
Jazakallahu khayr for the video