Deliciously evil film and Hitchcock at his most explicit. I love it for how... undisguised it is. He's not trying to hide behind mechanics here, as he does in, say, Psycho (part of reason why I find it so weak); he's expressing himself through his fetishism of all this film's aspects. I do think this wouldn't be as interesting if it wasn't Hitchcock directing it, in part because it feels to be so directly about him. That is what gives its intrigue.
Not really one of my favourites.Even though the actors are fine enough.Maybe because i think of Bond when i see Sean Connery.(who along with Roger Moore are my favourite Bonds).
Deliciously evil film and Hitchcock at his most explicit. I love it for how... undisguised it is. He's not trying to hide behind mechanics here, as he does in, say, Psycho (part of reason why I find it so weak); he's expressing himself through his fetishism of all this film's aspects. I do think this wouldn't be as interesting if it wasn't Hitchcock directing it, in part because it feels to be so directly about him. That is what gives its intrigue.
^This is an appraisal of Marnie which I can appreciate, thank you for sharing this!!
Not really one of my favourites.Even though the actors are fine enough.Maybe because i think of Bond when i see Sean Connery.(who along with Roger Moore are my favourite Bonds).