Translating Sentences into Logical Expressions
Вставка
- Опубліковано 10 тра 2018
- Discrete Mathematics: Translating English Sentences into Logical Expressions
Topics discussed:
1. Need to convert English sentences to logical expressions.
2. Steps to convert a sentence to a logical expression.
Follow Neso Academy on Instagram: @nesoacademy(bit.ly/2XP63OE)
Follow me on Instagram: @jaspreetedu(bit.ly/2YX26E5)
Contribute: www.nesoacademy.org/donate
Memberships: bit.ly/2U7YSPI
Books: www.nesoacademy.org/recommende...
Website ► www.nesoacademy.org/
Forum ► forum.nesoacademy.org/
Facebook ► goo.gl/Nt0PmB
Twitter ► / nesoacademy
Music:
Axol x Alex Skrindo - You [NCS Release]
#DiscreteMathematicsByNeso #DiscreteMaths #LogicalExpressions
*struggles in class*
*goes to YT*
*hears Indian accent*
Me: THANK GOD
"Isn't that so" is legendary.
gets me every time
one of the legendary catchphrases
I think the good that this man has done to so many students is immesurable
please don't stop making videos....love you so much #neso for your help..!!😘 💖
You are a very smart man, and you explained this so simply, in a way my professor couldn't. Thank you
You're smarter than my professor
Sir, please make a video to explain this topic using predicate and quantifiers.
Thank you!
Thanks a lot i struggle with this subject in the exams🥺🥺😭😭thanks from the deep part of my heart
Great lectures my friend, thank you so much!
amazing explanation dude you are amazing man
I had a query. For the statements to be consistent - we don't need all the statements to be true. Just that there should be a set which allows for a situation where there is no inconsistency.
So in this case - why can't p be false. In that case p q will be satisfied.
p is already True, from specification 4. So, p can't be false from specification 1, otherwise it contradicts the fact that a proposition can't be both True and False.
p is already True, from specification 4. So, p can't be false from specification 1, otherwise it contradicts the fact that a proposition can't be both True and False.
why then r in ( botttom to up ) kernal is functioning false ?
Excellently briefed sir thnx
Thank you so much this really helped. Was having the hardest time in my spring philosophy class so happy I found your channel.
Great videos, really helpful in computer science
Amazing lecture
Wowwwww!!! I understood the exampe so well :) Thank youuuuuuu
Legendary Teacher thanks!!
Nice to see new lecture of Dm but why
C programming......is skipped
Love the first example 😂😂😂
"You are awsm"
It is a true proposition!
Great work....
In example 1 why we have to take in example 1:- statement 1 as q can't we take as p and we can do it asp->q
How i get this playlists video of this topic ??? I have searched it but i don't get it
Thanks sir
Thank you so much 👍👍👍👍
I love Neso Academy ❤️
Amazing I'm shocked for 10secs.
How good the teacher is.
Thank you🙏
What I don't understand is applying the truth value to the premise "S = F", when "~S" expresses falsity, because it is negating "S", which is true. Unless, you applied falsity to S, which makes the expression "~S = T". How come do we apply, if we can use numeric values, "S = 1", instead of "S = 0"?
Never mind. As stated in the video, in order to answer the primary question of consistency of system, to begin our induction, we must make the first proposition true. To accomplish this, as in to make "~S" true, we must apply the truth value of "false" onto preposition "S". Therefore, "~S --> T".
Sir Baki videos kb upload Kroge?? At least give us a specified time
Sir what is ur real name?
And from which state u are?
U are a genius sir ji......
awesome
Is it necessary to check consistency in the exact order that you did? I checked consistency in a different order and received the same “NOT consistent” answer.
No, it's neccesary but it is easy to do as sir do
What is ambiguity?
When is a propositional formula P valid? When is P satisfiable????.. please! answer this question. Thank you.
👍👍💓 nice Thanks!!
This one thing i have been learning like almost 3 months and already gave a exam on it but still couldn't get it and here I learned it in 10 minutes!
Why I didn't find it earlier 😭
mujhe toh yahan bhi samajh na aaya abb sirf pankha dikhra hai upar
sir i love you..you are superb
..hello sir.
Are brackets of much importance?
Forexample when writing p^q and (p^q)
As far as I can tell, you need brackets when the operators are not in order of precedence. For example (p->q)^p needs the brackets because ^ is a higher precedent than -> but p->(q^p) would not need brackets because ^ is already of higher precedent than ->. Brackets are like a precedent of 0, they are even higher precedent than negation. I thought I would respond because as far as I've seen he does not respond to comments. Hope this helps!
@@apollochickens ..thenx much. I get
It is possible for list of statement to be consistent and inconsistent..i know it might be a stupid question but
Let's say if i put s true instead of false and i am getting all statements true then won't it be consistent making the statements consistent and inconsistent at the same time
"The system is not Interrupted mode" is a solid facts knowing it then in truth table its negations is the opposite if in problem s is a solid facts then its true which its opposite is false that is why he put false in S.
11 minutes before the exam starts, thank god this video is only 10 minutes.
WTF you have done before exams 😒
I'm 22 yr old so, I can solve the first problem :) 😁 😆 😅 😂 🤣
WOW!!!WOW!!!WOW!!!WOW..........................until eternity
rely nice
If Christine is a lawyer then Pablos is a logician then Yukiko is a linguist .
Can you please help me?
Let p, q, and r be the following propositions:
p: Christine is a lawyer.
q: Pablo is a logician.
r: Yukiko is a linguist.
The given statement can be represented using the following proposition:
"If Christine is a lawyer, then Pablo is a logician, and Yukiko is a linguist."
This can be written as:
p → (q ∧ r)
How can we convert a story thirsty crow in this
code for IIF command if this or this
Why can't we make p as false?
Property of consistency
its have ppt please😥🥺
I`ve a question bro.Why "p" has to be true?If it`s false then the whole consistent would be true.So are there any obligation that the first statement must be true or like that?
PLz lemme know if you read my comments-.
you re right if p is false whole consistent would be true
Same question bro
Same question.. I think, it all depends on the way we rename the statements..
Sir I think p should be true check the 4th one since s is false and p is not p,p has to be true to satisfy not p implies s
Then the system specifications are consistent right?
Even i think p should be true in the 4th one
P is true bro in 4th. Check again properly.
None but the brave deserves the fair . How to change it to logical form can you help me
I am trying but not sure
Change the sentence to "If brave then deserves the fair"
brave = p
deserves the fair = q
So, p -> q
@@sweetjimmy haha leave it bruh I already passed the class 😆 thanks for your concern tho I really appreciate you . ❤️❤️❤️❤️. God bless 😉
I'm lost !
Your voice is like a badge 99😁
globalisation - learning math from indian guy speaking english
why P cant be false so that we can make the statement true
Because a biconditional statement is only true when both conditions are true or false. Since P has already been assigned as true, it can't be false. Therefore the system is inconsistent.
But, where is it specified that P is made true??
Translate the following English sentence into logical expression
"You can ride the roller coaster if you are under 4 ft tall and you are older than 16yr old."
p: you can ride the roller coaster
q: you are under 4ft tall
r: you are older than 16yr
"You can ride the roller coaster if you are under 4 ft tall and you are older than 16yr old."
~ "If you are under 4ft tall and you are older than 16yr, then you can ride the roller coaster"
~ "If q and r, then p"
~ "if q^r then p"
= (q^r) -> p
(q^r)-->p
I didn't buy a lottery ticket this week or I bought a lottery ticket and I won a million dollars on Friday.
Can anyone translate it into logical expression?
Time waste