Just How Advanced Is Su-57 Stealth Fighter?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 бер 2023
  • The SU-57 is a highly advanced and capable fighter jet well-suited for a wide range of missions. Its stealth capabilities, advanced avionics, and high maneuverability make it a formidable opponent in air-to-air combat, while its ability to carry a wide range of weapons makes it highly effective in air-to-ground missions. Its modular design and ease of maintenance also make it a highly efficient and cost-effective aircraft.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 2,6 тис.

  • @davidfroehlich2702
    @davidfroehlich2702 Рік тому +3020

    So stealthy, nobody ever sees one

    • @marcusphilius1198
      @marcusphilius1198 Рік тому +1

      Jokes have been used the saim amount of time of you're mom pssy

    • @vladimiripotzky5392
      @vladimiripotzky5392 Рік тому +83

      Are you blind? I see them, they’re not stealthy now!🤪

    • @AccordGTR
      @AccordGTR Рік тому +176

      The punch you don't see is the one that knocks you out!

    • @synclabcreative2048
      @synclabcreative2048 Рік тому +52

      Ты поймёшь что это «стелс-истребитель», когда услышишь подлёт ракеты по характерному звуку, и за мгновение до взрыва, возможно, ты успеешь увидеть пролетающий силуэт истребителя СУ-57, но это редкость. Такой класс самолетов стреляет по противнику задолго до попадания в поле зрения😂

    • @zdol4635
      @zdol4635 Рік тому +43

      ​@@synclabcreative2048 такой класс псевдостелсов как су-57 светится на радарах, как новогодняя ёлка))

  • @trevorkeating229
    @trevorkeating229 Рік тому +531

    No matter what you say, that is one sexy plane!

    • @sunnex474
      @sunnex474 Рік тому +18

      As evidenced by people calling it “femboy”

    • @templarrising6299
      @templarrising6299 Рік тому +35

      ​@@sunnex474 Ukraine with USA weapons is losing

    • @sunnex474
      @sunnex474 Рік тому +14

      @@templarrising6299 I see your copium rehab did not work.

    • @Baronstone
      @Baronstone Рік тому +23

      @@sunnex474 Wrong aircraft, that would be the SU-75 Checkmate that is lovingly known as the SU-75 femboy.
      The Su-57 is absolutely a fantastic fighter aircraft, it just isn't the 5th generation fighter that Russia wanted it to be. Of course, the same is true of the Chinese J-20 and the various F-22 clones in design by many other nations right now.
      The problem all of those countries have is that all they have is the general shape of the F-22 without understanding why it works. What they don't understand is that it literally costs many tens of billions of dollars to figure out how to reduce Radar Cross Section (RCS) by the amount they did on the F-22

    • @Baronstone
      @Baronstone Рік тому

      @@templarrising6299 Not anytime in this century. Heck, they are literally rioting across Russia in protest of Putin's unwanted war. Russia has lost somewhere between 200,000-250,000 troops in the first year of its war with Ukraine. A war they should have won within a couple of weeks, instead Ukraine made Russia look like a horse's rear like they have no clue how to fight a war, and don't plan to learn anytime in the next decade!!

  • @genericamerican.
    @genericamerican. Рік тому +690

    Fun fact: It has the radar cross section of an F-18

    • @MrGriff305
      @MrGriff305 Рік тому +2

      ​@卐 Just trolling around dumb vegetables but you're just trolling around

    • @brak1296
      @brak1296 Рік тому +1

      ​​@卐 Just trolling around dumb vegetables either way, not good.

    • @bittemeinrammstein
      @bittemeinrammstein Рік тому +145

      According to who? I see people claim this all the time, but wheres the source?

    • @genericamerican.
      @genericamerican. Рік тому

      @@bittemeinrammstein War thunder forums leaks

    • @bittemeinrammstein
      @bittemeinrammstein Рік тому +7

      @@genericamerican. Lmao

  • @IamRichGuy1111
    @IamRichGuy1111 4 місяці тому +16

    This is a killer shark of the skies 🦈🦈 Su57

  • @pjp7259
    @pjp7259 Рік тому +334

    Let’s not forget about the state of the art Garmin navigation taped to the instrument cluster 😂

    • @patrickclay6375
      @patrickclay6375 Рік тому +5

      Broo 😂😂😂

    • @masakeris
      @masakeris Рік тому +3

      thats because you never flown navigational flight in army plane. i would use civil navigation even in US planes.

    • @pjp7259
      @pjp7259 Рік тому +17

      @@masakeris that’s fine, you did it by choice. Supposedly world class fighter jets from a supposed superpower should not rely on consumer grade navigation to strike military targets with civilian casualties as a consequence.

    • @pjp7259
      @pjp7259 Рік тому +3

      @@masakeris it’s funny how you assume to know what I have done. I am a 14 year army combat vet, got out in 2014 after my knee was blown up in an IED.

    • @masakeris
      @masakeris Рік тому +3

      @@pjp7259 "IAD" , with all the respect, you not a pilot. Joking about something you never tried. Even general aviation aircrafts are hard to fly vfr navigation. Military planes are hella faster and army placing orders by village names. So you would fly 1000nautical until you find village in avionics. Easiest way is to put that to civil navigation and acting like a flying car 😁

  • @faded6927
    @faded6927 Рік тому +1311

    The first stealth fighter that can be detected by radar

    • @keith8880
      @keith8880 Рік тому +273

      The F117 got shot detected and shot down by an old Soviet S125 air defense system

    • @hx20games77
      @hx20games77 Рік тому +55

      ​@@keith8880 ughh thats a bomber not fighter but yeah

    • @Typexviiib
      @Typexviiib Рік тому +107

      ​@@keith8880 when the f117 had a bomb bay door stuck open and flew within a couple miles of a sam launcher. You fail to mention the thousands of sortees with non malfunctioning f117 that were not shot down.

    • @dickmelsonlupot7697
      @dickmelsonlupot7697 Рік тому +21

      @@Typexviiib
      The F117 can actually still be seen.
      You're also not stating the fact that the only reason they timed it right is because if they turn on their radar and when they see the plane, the plane can also see them meaning they can be attacked before getting a lock-on and launching a missile.
      They are still visible by radar, they just have a smaller signature. This is why when the US illegally let 2 of them pass through Austrian air space and then bomb Iraq, they had to be very close to an American air tanker.

    • @andreyoung8732
      @andreyoung8732 Рік тому

      Bullshit

  • @akeeorakii2844
    @akeeorakii2844 4 місяці тому +31

    Forget about capabilities…
    How beautiful su57 is..❤
    It looks fuking extraordinary

  • @Meem1.
    @Meem1. Рік тому +102

    Average american( 99.9%):
    - "its so stealth that we don't even see one🤭🤡"

    • @cernst29
      @cernst29 6 місяців тому +11

      I'm an average American and even i thought that was a stupid comment.

    • @RohtoriGeePee
      @RohtoriGeePee 4 місяці тому +1

      still true tho

    • @digitaldruglord1815
      @digitaldruglord1815 4 місяці тому +1

      ​@@RohtoriGeePeenot really no

    • @beNETiq_ru
      @beNETiq_ru 4 місяці тому

      Yeah, muricans ☕ enjoying biden with guns at home and incappacity to ask referendum, masochists

    • @MrMTGPsycho
      @MrMTGPsycho 4 місяці тому

      ​@@digitaldruglord1815so it's seen air to air combat?

  • @powerhx3
    @powerhx3 Рік тому +303

    I’m sure that bare metal on the exhaust is super stealthy.

    • @parthaprotim5955
      @parthaprotim5955 Рік тому +55

      You know as many of these comments I have seen. I always wonder if they could not have easily covered the engines. The engineers must have had good reason not to. How many stealth aircraft projects have you worked on that makes you elligible to judge this aircraft ?

    • @powerhx3
      @powerhx3 Рік тому +27

      Most of the finest engineers in the Soviet Union were Ukrainian. The reason why is because it’s a retread of an old design with a new body kit. They cannot afford a real 5th gen design.

    • @Typexviiib
      @Typexviiib Рік тому +37

      ​@@parthaprotim5955 you don't think the fact that b2, f117, f22, f35, j20 all have their engine bodies covered by ram panels is a sign?
      There's a reason why experts in the field say su57 is only stealth in the straight on front aspect, and why india ran away from the project.

    • @MrCooper83
      @MrCooper83 Рік тому +6

      Yeah but stealth technology does not work that way... It can have metal parts on the aircraft as long as it is unable to reflect radar waves. Im pretty sure that they thought about it.

    • @Typexviiib
      @Typexviiib Рік тому +8

      @@MrCooper83 metals are highly reflective to radar. They did think about it. They decided that putting ram over inefficient russian engines would just cause the ram to burn off. They decided to run it bare and only focus on frontal aspect stealth.
      F35 has a somewhat similar issue with the ram on the tail fins. Under after burner use the ram will overheat after a minute or two. The us chose to ask it's pilots not to use their afterburners, Russia chose to leave the engines exposed. Different design philosophies based of the relative ability of the countries to do maintenance.

  • @GokageBlack
    @GokageBlack Рік тому +196

    But can it dogfight 1 Tom Cruise?

    • @02suraditpengsaeng41
      @02suraditpengsaeng41 Рік тому +11

      Nah, totally it's not a plane, it's pilot
      Rogue pilot get several skill issues

    • @02suraditpengsaeng41
      @02suraditpengsaeng41 Рік тому +6

      @arek Jowo Fun fact is Russia aircraft functional way better in Movie, Game, etc
      IRL love to smash to the earth more than F-35

    • @dennismull147
      @dennismull147 Рік тому

      Tom Stole& bag of ass,and we are having a great timewiththeseGals.

    • @rebuskecebong
      @rebuskecebong Рік тому +11

      It can if it was not Hollywood

    • @JohnAkaSB
      @JohnAkaSB Рік тому +4

      @@02suraditpengsaeng41 F35 like to go swimming though

  • @bill9540
    @bill9540 Рік тому +8

    That was 3 of their entire fleet of 10 right there 🥳

  • @julio7099
    @julio7099 Рік тому +28

    It's a beautiful jet.

  • @_XPXI
    @_XPXI Рік тому +938

    Whatever you say, the thing looks beautiful.
    Edit: Yeah, whatever you say, it looks beautiful. I don’t care if there hasn’t been many made, or they’re not the best at stealth, the thing looks good.

    • @turkishmaid
      @turkishmaid Рік тому +8

      Your chances to see one are remote, just because there aren’t many.

    • @ulrichkristensen4087
      @ulrichkristensen4087 Рік тому +5

      So does Batgirl, she does not exist either

    • @ishikaorimura6803
      @ishikaorimura6803 Рік тому +7

      Beautiful enough to be shut down beautifully 😂

    • @lyric-992
      @lyric-992 Рік тому +47

      ​@@ishikaorimura6803blah blah. But if someone will send you this as a gift. I bet you will be Crying for your mom to keep it

    • @ishikaorimura6803
      @ishikaorimura6803 Рік тому +4

      @@lyric-992 well someone is butt hurt

  • @venox3811
    @venox3811 Рік тому +225

    I wonder how stealthy is the plane with those huge exposed engines.

    • @oscarperez4435
      @oscarperez4435 Рік тому +35

      It’s got a higher rcs than the hornet. Not very stealthy

    • @f-16viper99
      @f-16viper99 Рік тому +58

      ​@@oscarperez4435 incorrect. carrying weapons externally increases your RCS. carrying them internally doesnt. then, f18 relies on pods for IRST and external fuel tanks to achieve the same combat range a su57 can achieve without them. this is where the RCS of a hornet and a felon gets very different. also, the estimated RCS of a clean hornet is 1-3m^2. the estimated RCS of the felon is 0.1-1m^2, 0.01m^2 frontal RCS. y'all took the lowest estimate of the hornet and the highest estimate of the felon. this is unfair. quit recyling the overused f18=su57 yt argument that got debunked many times already

    • @kevinmonahan2820
      @kevinmonahan2820 Рік тому +9

      ​@@f-16viper99 su57 still isn't s true 5th gen yet cause of its engines. Great it has good stealth characteristics from a certain angle but in real combat vs us we will smoke them

    • @f-16viper99
      @f-16viper99 Рік тому +34

      @@kevinmonahan2820 only our f22 and f35 smoke the su57 anytime, not our 4th gens. and yes, su57 isnt a true stealth, but for anyone to believe the yt argument that an f18 has more stealth capabilities than su57 is just absurdly stupid

    • @f-16viper99
      @f-16viper99 Рік тому +14

      @@amazin7006 you might wanna read again about how the US Navy gave up on the stealth conformal fuel tank (CFT) for the Block III super hornet as they found problems in 2020 related to cost, performace, and schedule
      for the stealth paint of the hornet, it is still undergoing in development stage. to be fair, su57 is also in the same stage. soon the felon will get both new Izdeliye 30 engines and stealth coating, finally making it a true 5th gen fighter, significantly reducing its RCS
      lastly, a clean hornet is similar to a felon. this means it is a hornet without fuel tanks, IRST pods, and no weapons at all. 1 unit of aim120 being carried externally will significantly increase a fighter's total RCS. this is not the same case for the su57

  • @rifmaffia
    @rifmaffia 2 місяці тому +2

    Everyone talking stealth until encounter this beast and starts flying donuts around you💫

  • @TheHalcyonAnon
    @TheHalcyonAnon Рік тому +3

    Radar may be able to see it from Mars but damn is that a gorgeous plane

  • @critical890208
    @critical890208 Рік тому +64

    Haters cant appreciate the beauty of Engineering and argue on the production capability

    • @f-16viper99
      @f-16viper99 Рік тому +12

      its their pathetic way of coping. same thing to russian bots trying to hate on the f35 not being able to dogfight

    • @Mandingo_
      @Mandingo_ Рік тому +7

      production capability 😂

    • @critical890208
      @critical890208 Рік тому +1

      @@Mandingo_ what? U prefer capacity ha genius?

    • @f-16viper99
      @f-16viper99 Рік тому +3

      @arek Jowo they look good on chinese sea too, dont they?

    • @02suraditpengsaeng41
      @02suraditpengsaeng41 Рік тому

      Btw I love big symmetry wing two engine gonna be SU-57 and SU-37
      F-35 definitely my hate but man, SU-57 not fine work compare that thing

  • @iCANT_BELIEVE_YOU_SAID_THAT
    @iCANT_BELIEVE_YOU_SAID_THAT Рік тому +72

    It's so stealthy, you can't even see it on the battlefield.

    • @houndschlitz763
      @houndschlitz763 Рік тому +1

      On the airport.

    • @Astrashastra
      @Astrashastra Рік тому +5

      So is the case with the infamous baloon bomber f22. Spent billions to be kept at home.

    • @ddarkon1223
      @ddarkon1223 Рік тому +2

      That's the whole point

    • @gerrychartrand360
      @gerrychartrand360 Рік тому +2

      Exactly why go near, when you can do damage from 4 to 5 hundred km's

    • @user-kg2om4cy2b
      @user-kg2om4cy2b Рік тому +5

      Who can see 20 years old f22 on battlefield? Answer- no one😂
      The west has only show-offs and hollywood with maverick 😅

  • @polarking888
    @polarking888 Рік тому +6

    "The high performance ,stealthy aircraft" part almost got me

    • @Kontro_7
      @Kontro_7 9 місяців тому

      "the big fucking su-57 is a 1st gen fighter with no stealth at all it's so little advanced that it might if been made in the stone age"

    • @FaridunKamarov
      @FaridunKamarov 5 місяців тому

      ​@@Kontro_7wowww you are so original 😵😵😵

    • @Kontro_7
      @Kontro_7 5 місяців тому

      @@FaridunKamarov russian spy 🚨🚨🚨

  • @Migos-DG
    @Migos-DG Рік тому +2

    The stealth is Soo good no one has ever seen it before, a phantom on the battle field

  • @kk83512
    @kk83512 Рік тому +92

    No matter how capable it is, it won’t matter if it cannot be mass produced.

    • @TEMPLAR_10
      @TEMPLAR_10 Рік тому

      Ahh unlike America,russia dont dominate other country and steal resources 😂

    • @badbadbadcat
      @badbadbadcat Рік тому +7

      1) If it's capable it's good
      2) You've no idea about the mass production capabilities of any country on earth lol

    • @zero-su3un
      @zero-su3un Рік тому

      ​​​@@badbadbadcat This plane is so bad that ur country literally ran away from the program with russia why bother defending it

    • @ddarkon1223
      @ddarkon1223 Рік тому +3

      It was produced in 2019
      11 are in service
      I'd say it will be

    • @knight1706
      @knight1706 Рік тому +8

      @@ddarkon1223out of those 11 5 are prototypes, only 3 are combat capable right now

  • @oohhsedagod6183
    @oohhsedagod6183 Рік тому +58

    News flash the Su-57 is only frontal stealth, it's not fully stealth it can still be detected by radar💯

    • @Aerial_Imaging
      @Aerial_Imaging Рік тому +13

      This video is very low quality, no stealth fighter 'avoids radar detection' 😂 Just prevents a missile lock.

    • @kevinmonahan2820
      @kevinmonahan2820 Рік тому +3

      Correct, the su57 doesn't have stealth engines yet but also correct that stealth aircraft can be detected by low frequency radars but that type of radar isn't reliable enough to guide a weapon successfully

    • @kevinmonahan2820
      @kevinmonahan2820 Рік тому +2

      Su57 is really 4.5 until it gets the new engines they are supposedly getting

    • @TwixSvK
      @TwixSvK Рік тому

      It has an internal weapons bay which alone makes a big difference in stealth.

    • @dickmelsonlupot7697
      @dickmelsonlupot7697 Рік тому +5

      No "stealth" aircraft is invisible by radar.
      All of them can still be seen.
      The only difference is that their "signature" i.e. the blip you'll see on a radar screen is smaller.
      Hell, you can still get a missile lock but you need to somewhat be close so that your sensors can properly detect it if it's using a jet fighter's sensors alone.
      If there's an AEW&C plane, it increases the likelihood of being spotted as well.
      "Stealth" is more of a misnomer that regular people tend to get misconceptions of and where the military is too dumbbb and prideful to actually state the truth.
      No stealth aircraft is really "invisible" or "stealthy".
      They're just hard to see especially if you're not expecting them to be there.
      But if you are, you can actually see them but like I said, they just have a smaller signature.

  • @onlinebuy
    @onlinebuy Рік тому +2

    Calling that a stealth aircraft is me calling myself an NFL linebacker.

    • @Idiot72
      @Idiot72 2 місяці тому

      Ah a american
      accept the fact that russia is better

  • @liamw3153
    @liamw3153 Рік тому +1

    With a radar cross section that big I thought I was looking at a bomber not a stealth fighter

  • @averyharris9949
    @averyharris9949 Рік тому +285

    Too bad there isn’t enough to make a squadron

    • @anonymous4955
      @anonymous4955 Рік тому +36

      Su 57 was launched 2019 which is roughly 3 years and has over 74 units 65 operational so it is impressive that over 3 year 2 were built each month that is quite impressive for a country who's main Focus is anti air.

    • @averyharris9949
      @averyharris9949 Рік тому +55

      My eyes have started glowing… I have awakened another pro Russian bot. Oh boy! Russias main focus in terms of battle tactics is actually land-based combat, such as tanks, artillery, infantry, and the like. Second of all, those are rookie production numbers, the US produces on average about 10-12 F-35s a month, far outfacing your basic production numbers. Third of all, use punctuation, because much like your war in Ukraine, that sentence went on way longer than it had to.

    • @callsignsealt5340
      @callsignsealt5340 Рік тому +34

      @@anonymous4955 Russia has 3, 2 operational and 1 not even ready to fly.

    • @anonymous4955
      @anonymous4955 Рік тому +17

      @@callsignsealt5340 they have 74 currently in service and it launched 2019 so at least two every month, which is pretty good for a country that focuses more on missile defense system, so do you research so as not to make a fool of yourself.

    • @Voys0
      @Voys0 Рік тому +38

      @@anonymous4955 they don't even have 12 working ones idk where you got 74 from

  • @steve4158
    @steve4158 Рік тому +98

    In "Top Gun Maverick," they had to CGI the plane into the movie, as so many have correctly commented, they exist mainly on paper.

    • @user-gi5el4sc3t
      @user-gi5el4sc3t Рік тому +31

      I'm sorry, but do you really think that F-22s that you see in most american movies are real ones?
      Noone would ever give 5th gen fighter for a fancy film...

    • @doge3169
      @doge3169 Рік тому +4

      @@user-gi5el4sc3t f18 in top gun is real so yeah…

    • @user-gi5el4sc3t
      @user-gi5el4sc3t Рік тому +21

      @@doge3169 Don't you see the difference in how much information is classified for 4th gen F-18 and 5th gen F-22?
      That would be absurdly stupid to give away any information about this thing. Even flight perfomance is still classified and publicly known information is highly inaccurate.

    • @steve4158
      @steve4158 Рік тому +2

      @@user-gi5el4sc3t You're probably 100% right. At least we have them, albeit not in large numbers.

    • @steve4158
      @steve4158 Рік тому +3

      @@mfxkarma No kidding. I wasn't suggesting they did. I was trying to say Russia can't produce more than a few of these planes. But you're the expert.

  • @DontWorryAboutIt00
    @DontWorryAboutIt00 4 місяці тому +1

    You can find these things on Google Earth. They’re not even parked in hangars.

  • @nicolo6222
    @nicolo6222 Місяць тому

    If there is only one, the radar sees five

  • @ricksgrandauditorium8790
    @ricksgrandauditorium8790 Рік тому +228

    What uses 20 liters of fuel an hour, puts out a shit ton of smoke and noise and cuts an apple in 3 pieces? Russian machine designed to cut apples in 4 pieces.

  • @dreemeagle
    @dreemeagle Рік тому +53

    with that big goiter outside the cockpit?
    looks about stealthy as a Stuka;

    • @_sausageman_
      @_sausageman_ Рік тому +9

      Wait until you see the rivets

    • @henryairconcepts2999
      @henryairconcepts2999 Рік тому +5

      If Stuka didn't whistle... it was pretty stealthy 😁

    • @KatariaGujjar
      @KatariaGujjar Рік тому +2

      F-35 got a bigger goiter on its chin.

    • @user-lz8qo2ie7s
      @user-lz8qo2ie7s Рік тому +2

      This is an optical location system. Thanks to this thing, the plane can be called "stealth" since this system does not disturb the warning system. (I do not know why it was not installed on the Raptor, although such a system appeared already on the MiG-23)

  • @DS-ep9pp
    @DS-ep9pp Рік тому

    Every American and nato fighter pilot: hold my beer

  • @marktwain2053
    @marktwain2053 2 місяці тому

    It makes a howl so loud that it can be heard from miles away, but it's main stealthyness is from the fact that it's almost non-existent.

  • @speedy0231
    @speedy0231 Рік тому +33

    “It’s not the plane. It’s the pilot.” Maverick

    • @Across_Media
      @Across_Media  Рік тому +3

      Haahahaa.

    • @gerrychartrand360
      @gerrychartrand360 Рік тому +5

      Yes it is, and Mig 29 pilots were the best.

    • @apocsoviet3813
      @apocsoviet3813 Рік тому

      whoever came up with that line is a total idi.ot
      The US to spent hundreds of billions of dollars of tax money trying to build the best planes.

    • @brianforrester9670
      @brianforrester9670 Рік тому +6

      @@gerrychartrand360 lol. U.S. pilots get more than 2x the air time and training as Russian pilots.

    • @gerrychartrand360
      @gerrychartrand360 Рік тому +2

      @@brianforrester9670 cause they need the practice

  • @TaitLawrence-xl2xb
    @TaitLawrence-xl2xb Рік тому +129

    It's so stealthy you don't even see it over the skies of Ukraine!
    Edit: To all you people in the replies. I was making a joke that the Russians didn't really use the SU-57 and hence you couldn't see them over Ukraine they were "So stealthy" I know they have been seen doing missions in Ukraine I was simply making a joke. Can't believe I have to write this

    • @BadBoiFX
      @BadBoiFX Рік тому +21

      Cope harder ‘merica

    • @IDK-mh3ur
      @IDK-mh3ur Рік тому

      NATO supporters bots

    • @justsomerandomguy5346
      @justsomerandomguy5346 Рік тому +14

      Because they only have a few of this jet, they cannot even make a squadron of SU-57, and of course they don't want to really use it in ukraine since the chance of losing it is high

    • @TaitLawrence-xl2xb
      @TaitLawrence-xl2xb Рік тому +3

      @@IDK-mh3ur If you are reffering to me being a NATO bot no, I was just cracking a joke.

    • @anonymous4955
      @anonymous4955 Рік тому +2

      ​@@justsomerandomguy5346 actually they have 74 units 56 operational do maybe to you 100 makes a squadron, plus you didn't mock it when it was used in Iraq, you Americans are just double sided.

  • @anaheimca8127
    @anaheimca8127 Рік тому +3

    Even those screws and rivets are stealthy😅😅

  • @jefflee4527
    @jefflee4527 Рік тому +18

    The su-57 uses the most stealthy wood screws Russia has to offer to hold the aircraft together

  • @gravyd316
    @gravyd316 Рік тому +5

    4.5 but she's a looker. I'll give it that.

  • @racerx700
    @racerx700 Рік тому +23

    Its so advanced, Russia is afraid to use it against Ukraine

    • @f-16viper99
      @f-16viper99 Рік тому

      please tell me youre just making a joke... or are you actually this delusional?

    • @rauldario9203
      @rauldario9203 Рік тому +8

      They are using in Ukraine already

    • @fluffymuffin9089
      @fluffymuffin9089 Рік тому +4

      ​@@rauldario9203 false

    • @gerrychartrand360
      @gerrychartrand360 Рік тому +7

      They use it. Look at weapon range. They fire from safe point and return. Look up its weapon range. Educate youself before posting nonsense.

    • @gerrychartrand360
      @gerrychartrand360 Рік тому +2

      ​@@rauldario9203 yes they are.

  • @jsldj
    @jsldj Рік тому +1

    "It's not the plane......... it's the pilot!"

  • @ArsenicShooter
    @ArsenicShooter 2 місяці тому +1

    So stealthy, Sukhoy only found 17 of them

  • @ivangere4933
    @ivangere4933 Рік тому +42

    I'd love to see Ukraine sneak into the air base and steel one. Lol

    • @nhatpham2206
      @nhatpham2206 Рік тому +9

      keep imagining

    • @gatfsp4523
      @gatfsp4523 Рік тому +4

      OH THAT WOULD BE SOOOO 😎!! SLAVA UKRAINE 🇺🇦!!

    • @nhatpham2206
      @nhatpham2206 Рік тому +6

      @@gatfsp4523 haha, then they don't know how to use it and just like Taliban who try flying the UH-60

    • @rickylistman8279
      @rickylistman8279 Рік тому

      The west already has quite a few Felons, that were purchased through shell companies.
      Russia cannot support paying for new R&D projects. While filling their ranks for conflict.
      So Russians rely on selling there defense weapons to other counties in hopes they can make enough money to build their own fleets. The problem is all there recent designs are shit and no one wants them. Sure they can fly and shoot like their western counterparts. But no ground breaking tech has ever evolved to secure those contracts.
      Hence, they have only 15-20 felons which suck.
      And the T -14 even less.
      Russia sucks at life and they just proved it to the world by getting there ass kicked in Ukraine

    • @gatfsp4523
      @gatfsp4523 Рік тому +2

      @@nhatpham2206 WANNA BET, BOTH COUNTRIES USE ABOUT THE SAME EQUIPMENT BEFORE THE WAR WITH THE EXCEPTION OF RUSSIA'S THERMOBARIC WEAPONS AND THEY ALMOST SPEAK THE SAME LANGUAGE!!🤨

  • @CarnorJast1138
    @CarnorJast1138 Рік тому +1

    Despite all its shortcomings, and obvious flaws, i really like the "look" of the SU-57. One beautiful jet fighter. Just not what it says it can do.

  • @RedLP5000S
    @RedLP5000S 2 місяці тому

    Love the Banshee sound she makes.

  • @nitrocatofficial6939
    @nitrocatofficial6939 Рік тому +4

    I want to see a Deadliest Warrior episode with this vs other 5th generation jets

    • @gerrychartrand360
      @gerrychartrand360 Рік тому

      Their old might is only jet in world that can compete with modern jets. Educate yourself their old Mig I meant.

  • @harvzpanganiban5386
    @harvzpanganiban5386 Рік тому +64

    On paper maybe.. 🤣🤣🤣

    • @nhatpham2206
      @nhatpham2206 Рік тому

      yeah, good luck your UA bud getting shot by Kinzhal from the older Mig-31K

    • @carlambroson8872
      @carlambroson8872 Рік тому +7

      Right? I’d like to see 1 try to intercept a F-22 or F-35, then we’ll see how steathy it is. My money is on an F-22/35 turning the SU into flaming/falling scrap! 😂

    • @anonymous4955
      @anonymous4955 Рік тому +24

      ​@@carlambroson8872 su 27s regularly intercept f22 raptors, none of either the f22 nor f35 have seen any air combat, so you could consider it as over hype overconfidence kills and that is what you Americans are full of.

    • @carlambroson8872
      @carlambroson8872 Рік тому +9

      @@anonymous4955 this video wasn’t about 27s, it was about 57s. And let’s talk about false overconfidence, the entire force of 22s is air worthy, and at least 50-60% of the force of 35s is also airworthy. Which is FAR more than the % of 20 or so 57s Russia has, (most of which are prototypes)!
      So call it what you like, a 22 would not lose to a 57. In stealthiness or otherwise.

    • @aydenlessels5550
      @aydenlessels5550 Рік тому +6

      ​@@carlambroson8872I'd even have my money on the F-35, I mean, seriously, that's not even mentioning how far they would outnumber the Russian aircraft, it'd just be a slaughter.

  • @user-ef6be8jd4u
    @user-ef6be8jd4u 6 місяців тому

    Always waiting for punching then talk😅

  • @mathm7401
    @mathm7401 4 місяці тому +1

    "Stealth Capable", lmao the SU-57 has a radar signature of an SU-57

  • @uio890138
    @uio890138 Рік тому +46

    Proven to have nearly zero stealth ability

    • @anonymous4955
      @anonymous4955 Рік тому +12

      Where, did you fight against it?? None of your 5th Gen has seen air to air combat so keep listening to your leaders propaganda until it's too late

    • @carlambroson8872
      @carlambroson8872 Рік тому +1

      Not too surprising if true… the is bigger than a CAT mining dump truck. 🤭😂🤣

    • @uio890138
      @uio890138 Рік тому +2

      @@carlambroson8872 The Russian claim to fame is it's stealth.

    • @uio890138
      @uio890138 Рік тому +2

      @@anonymous4955 So you are saying our's are ineffective?......

    • @aydenlessels5550
      @aydenlessels5550 Рік тому

      ​@@uio890138I've seen this dude post on several sections, he seems like a pro-russian bot, or person, not worth arguing him.

  • @WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot3267
    @WhiskeyTangoFoxtrot3267 Рік тому

    The only time it’s ever flown was in Top Gun Maverick lol.

  • @alexconn7473
    @alexconn7473 2 місяці тому

    F-22: I hate cheap knockoffs

  • @klt479
    @klt479 Рік тому +7

    It's a shame no one wants to purchase nor employ the SU-57 in contested airspace (not even the Russians). Russian doesn't even operate a squadron of them. Doesn't appear you are aware 195 have been manufactured and put in service.

    • @mysteriousera1527
      @mysteriousera1527 Рік тому

      Like f22 raptor

    • @klt479
      @klt479 Рік тому +2

      @Mysterious Era 15 LOL, you should get your facts straight before posting. The list of countries that have attempted to purchase the F22 Raptor includes Israel, Japan, and Australia . 195 have also been manufactured and placed in operational service. The F22 also created and is the definition of an entirely new generation of fighter aircraft.

    • @Eradicator-jv9xr
      @Eradicator-jv9xr Рік тому

      ​@@klt479 uhhh you do realise the f22 is technically outdated by the F35. Not saying the f35 is better but the f35 has more advanced avionics along with cheaper costs allowing more to be made.

    • @klt479
      @klt479 Рік тому +3

      @Eradicator 5000 You do realize the F22 and F35 have been designed for two completely different purposes, correct? One is an air superiority fighter and the other is a multi-role fighter. For instance, the radar returns and signatures, armaments, electronic counter measures, electronic engagement, eletronic networking, super cruise, among a host of other capabilities are completely different.These fighters in no way are considered a replacement for each other. Anyone making this argument does not remotely understand their very unique combat elvelopes and roles. While the F22 is by far the most superior over the horizon air superiority platform without any real near pier, its replacements are already flying.

  • @feliscorax
    @feliscorax Рік тому +17

    “Sir, I think there’s an issue with our radar tracking”
    “What seems to be the problem?”
    “It keeps telling me a sparrow’s gone supersonic.”

  • @sheikhsubeh1003
    @sheikhsubeh1003 23 дні тому

    I see people complaining that- it's so stealthy that nobody sees one.
    I say pray to God that you never see one.

  • @neuman115
    @neuman115 Рік тому +10

    Laughs in F-22 raptor

    • @kris8165
      @kris8165 6 місяців тому

      And probably crashes immediately 😂

    • @FaridunKamarov
      @FaridunKamarov 5 місяців тому +3

      The f22 has only had 1 kill ever, a balloon 😂

    • @kris8165
      @kris8165 5 місяців тому

      @@FaridunKamarov Balloon 🎈 kill
      Lool😆

    • @RohtoriGeePee
      @RohtoriGeePee 4 місяці тому

      How many does the SU-57 have? And so what if the raptor has no air to air kills? it has many A2G kills due to it being used as an attack aircraft@@FaridunKamarov

  • @Captain_Mace
    @Captain_Mace Рік тому +5

    It's a solid aircraft, just not very stealthy. Much like the J-20, both aircraft focus on having the front of the aircraft reflect and absorb radar, but not the rest of the aircraft. It's why Russia is not taking the risk of having the jet in Ukraine, as it would easily be shot down.

    • @englishparcc1989
      @englishparcc1989 Рік тому +2

      The problem is, with its large takeoff weight and internal fuel storage, it’s clear the J20 was made to rush into the area undetected and fire off missiles at assets like AWACS and refuelers, for which frontal stealth is most important. Cant say the same for the Su 57 which just seems like a show off dogfighter

    • @deven6518
      @deven6518 Рік тому

      Well it has been in Ukraine and the funny thing is, from the side, it's more stealthy than the f35. So is the j20 and f22. People don't even know what's done to give stealth but they're commenting

    • @Captain_Mace
      @Captain_Mace Рік тому

      @@deven6518 Yes the F35 is the least stealthy but that is a by-product of it being cost effective. The J-20 and SU-57 though just simply have poor stealth qualities compared to the old B-2 and F-22. You are 100% right that most people have no idea what they're talking about.

    • @deven6518
      @deven6518 Рік тому +1

      @@Captain_Mace the f35 is not cost effective. The bare aircraft is as expensive as a fully kitted 4++ gen and it's more expensive than all except the f22, when kitted out.
      They do not have poor stealth qualities. My point about most people not knowing about stealth is that looking at both aircraft, you can see stealth everywhere. If you're just looking at the aircraft and making comparisons off head then that's an issue.
      The old b-2 is more stealthy than the f22 as well. Highly angular airframes is not the optimal design for stealth, especially since it's highly dependent on receiver vector and panel length. You would observe that the su57 and j20 employ curves in many places, to increase continuous panel length and reduce the effects of off angle reflections. Coupled with their relatively flat bodies it makes for quite a hard to detect platform. It also makes them more resistant to detection by longer wavelengths, the true challenge for a stealth aircraft. There are things like this everywhere, but people don't care. They know f22 and f35, they believe it's the best and that's all they want to hear.

    • @Captain_Mace
      @Captain_Mace Рік тому +1

      @@deven6518 F-35 is cost effective for what it can do. Too many people think RCS is the only factor when these 5th generation aircraft have much more to them. I work on LO coatings for the 5th generation aircraft and I can tell you, they're worth the cost. Russia and China are trying their best to catch up and they just might with time.. The Ukraine war proved that the SU-57 isn't good enough to even stand up to Ukraine as the aircraft has had to be extremely limited to its role in the war, knowing that is a fairly easy aircraft to shoot down.

  • @donlovato2067
    @donlovato2067 Рік тому +7

    American Jets have been doing that since 1980

  • @ANONYMOUS-yk2qf
    @ANONYMOUS-yk2qf 25 днів тому +1

    All that just to get destroyed by an F-14 Tomcat

  • @Chimpunk729
    @Chimpunk729 Рік тому +1

    Fact : uses the same engines of Su 35.
    Not stealthy enough so India rejected the joint development project.
    Recent war shows Russia has problem on high tech electronics such as chip.
    Unproven Radar, will it be AESA? or just PESA like Su 35?

  • @josetejeda301
    @josetejeda301 Рік тому +7

    it's a limited edition model, only 2 in existence. Probably the 2 you see on the video.

    • @thejourney7395
      @thejourney7395 Рік тому

      Being limited edition may make it worth a lot someday. 😂😂

    • @ddarkon1223
      @ddarkon1223 Рік тому

      Outdated joke
      There are 11 in service and 10 prototypes

  • @Rajath_2001
    @Rajath_2001 Рік тому +4

    It's good to have stealth capable aircrafts to carry out anti terror missions. The Indian government should invest in a squadron of these aircrafts until AMCA enters batch production.

    • @L8ugh1ngm8n1
      @L8ugh1ngm8n1 Рік тому +14

      India WAS looking at these and rejected them because they didn't come anywhere near what Russia was claiming they could achieve.

    • @CestSam
      @CestSam Рік тому +4

      These jets are just really good 4th gen dogfighters. Also Russia csnt afford them at all, I believe they only have about a dozen, while the US has hundreds of 5th gen fighters

    • @jonathanpfeffer3716
      @jonathanpfeffer3716 Рік тому

      The Indian government literally pulled out of the SU-57 program (after investing a considerable amount into it) because it was underperforming so badly. They aren’t ever gonna buy them.

    • @vitonff
      @vitonff Рік тому +1

      ​​@@L8ugh1ngm8n1 Нет Индия от них отказались потому что Индия вседа хочет получить не тольку саму военную технику, но и технологии их производства, но мало кто на это согласится, по очевидным причинам.

    • @VIDEOVISTAVIEW2020
      @VIDEOVISTAVIEW2020 Рік тому +3

      They did but backed out at the last minute after finding out some issues of this plane

  • @gd2438
    @gd2438 22 дні тому

    It has a vodka dispenser right in the cockpit.

  • @_maul_001
    @_maul_001 7 місяців тому

    This thing literally has a camo skin like games

  • @ukdesigner
    @ukdesigner Рік тому +5

    We just need Clint Eastwood to go and Pinch one.

  • @ALEXANDER_XI
    @ALEXANDER_XI Рік тому +7

    This Jet is going Crazy 🔥

    • @BNK2006
      @BNK2006 Рік тому

      What does that even mean?

    • @ALEXANDER_XI
      @ALEXANDER_XI Рік тому

      ​@@BNK2006 can you hear that sound of Su-57
      Suuuuuu........

  • @spontaneouslord3756
    @spontaneouslord3756 3 місяці тому +1

    So bad india missed opportunity to own some of these beautiful aircrafts.

  • @World_Analysis-
    @World_Analysis- Рік тому +2

    Imagine going against an entire fleet of Su-57’s…. Oh wait, there only 12 of them.

    • @shallowdarkness5626
      @shallowdarkness5626 Рік тому

      You really think the Russians would report on the actual number of Su-57's they have. Don't be naive!

    • @p_filippouz
      @p_filippouz 5 місяців тому

      There are actually around 40 right now

    • @pappagone6066
      @pappagone6066 15 днів тому

      imagine all the F35 one day when will be capable to fly and do something good..... imagine in that 30 years with same money spent what is capable to do Russia or China in front of the exploitation of trillions dollars the West did and are doing.... Then now finally we have many hundreds of F35 (in various models), but.... the many issues there are in f35 mantaining the quasi totality of them stopped into hangars. Then we are seeing IDF (despite genocidal habitude) with part of software and solutions developed by their industries flying and going quite well. In Usa "au contraire" we see f35 going down and many Nato partner obliged to use Eurofighter tornado old harriers and many other aircraft (old by time) making what f35 isn t able to do...... when this disgrace and eat money machine will be have the real worth that deserve?

  • @spontaneouslord3756
    @spontaneouslord3756 Рік тому +3

    Most beautiful jet on the planet.

  • @bernardwilson9387
    @bernardwilson9387 Рік тому +3

    Pretty cool jet the su-57

  • @juliorodriguez4954
    @juliorodriguez4954 18 днів тому

    We don’t need radar to find it. Its noise alone makes it easy to find!

  • @sulemanshamshuddin7077
    @sulemanshamshuddin7077 Місяць тому

    King of fighter jets.

  • @abhinandanyadav6831
    @abhinandanyadav6831 Рік тому +6

    And two of them got bucked by a F - 14 🦫

    • @LUCIFERO_23
      @LUCIFERO_23 Рік тому

      Yeah in Hollywood where they edited both the f14 and su57 overlay on top of f16....happens only in hollywood

  • @reyajalisha3268
    @reyajalisha3268 Рік тому +7

    Most beautiful or powerful jet!! ❤

  • @josesantizo4432
    @josesantizo4432 6 місяців тому

    Okay okay besides the f-22 and the b2 Bomber this is my third favorite

  • @kenz5469
    @kenz5469 8 місяців тому

    This guy must be a Sukhoi salesman

  • @mohammadbino2333
    @mohammadbino2333 Рік тому +3

    The most beautiful aircraft i have ever seen .

  • @AngelRodriguez-zt6nv
    @AngelRodriguez-zt6nv Рік тому +4

    One beautiful bird 👍

  • @Chaos8282
    @Chaos8282 Рік тому +1

    It's as scary as the T-14 Armata. Meaning it's not.

  • @sagargaikwad7276
    @sagargaikwad7276 9 днів тому

    Plane design is superb ❤

  • @magtovi
    @magtovi 6 місяців тому +3

    The American salt in these comments sections is delicious 😂😂😂

  • @ayericky6688
    @ayericky6688 Рік тому +3

    Remember the story of the Mig-25? Just a thought

    • @deven6518
      @deven6518 Рік тому

      Remember the botched teardown of the mig 25 in which most of the known ' facts ' about the aircraft are actually false?
      Just a thought.

    • @ayericky6688
      @ayericky6688 Рік тому

      @@deven6518 yeah thats the same story im talking about 😂

    • @deven6518
      @deven6518 Рік тому +1

      @@ayericky6688 yeah, I know. I'm saying that much of what was found out about the aircraft was false. Things like the aircraft redline, low g rating, poor supersonic range, lack of ejection seats etc....false. They literally said it had no ejection seats, while it had one of the best for its time and, quite frankly, one of the best ever

  • @imadefectivehuman
    @imadefectivehuman Рік тому +1

    I'll be scared when they have more than 10 in active service

  • @BO._oDEeE
    @BO._oDEeE Рік тому

    While the f-35 has a full 360° view from the visor that alone is incredibly OP

  • @jgregor3338
    @jgregor3338 Рік тому +62

    The most advanced system of the fighter is its GPS by far.A Garmin device sticked to dash by a tape 😂😂🤣

    • @nhatpham2206
      @nhatpham2206 Рік тому +1

      how bout UA air force? P-51 Mustang?

    • @dan4500
      @dan4500 Рік тому +7

      ​@@nhatpham2206 yes a P51 could probably shoot this Russian junk down, thanks for asking.😊

    • @nhatpham2206
      @nhatpham2206 Рік тому +9

      @@dan4500 ah ok, then why I see no jets got down these days? those "junk" still flying and bombarding

    • @JuanVargas-jv5ts
      @JuanVargas-jv5ts Рік тому +5

      ​@@nhatpham2206 yes cause the crappy U.S fighter jets fall to the ocean once they take off from the aircraft carriers.

    • @hugoespinoza3675
      @hugoespinoza3675 Рік тому +7

      ​@@JuanVargas-jv5tsyeah what 1 out of over 800 active f35, how many felons out there lol..

  • @lecoccslayer
    @lecoccslayer Рік тому +6

    first time seeing an unbiased review of the su57, and it is amazing. keep up the good work!

    • @isaacjensen
      @isaacjensen Рік тому

      Lol there’s a reason the Indian Air Force rejected their order of su57’s. They found out it wasn’t capable of half the thing Russia claimed it was capable of 😂

  • @sweatybotfn9982
    @sweatybotfn9982 Рік тому +3

    Finally a non biased vid on su-57, great job

  • @itsfoxxi6620
    @itsfoxxi6620 Рік тому

    So stealthy that its only been seen in videogames and movies

  • @kd7bwb12
    @kd7bwb12 Рік тому +1

    Let’s keep in mind, that until 90-days ago, the SU-57 was being powered with engines from the SU-30 jet fighter aircraft.
    The SU-57 engines were finally completed and the plane now works at its stated performance parameters.

  • @robertclements4865
    @robertclements4865 Рік тому +3

    I'd like to know how they got the stealth tech.😡

    • @ahinomas2805
      @ahinomas2805 Рік тому +7

      Pyotr Yakovlevich Ufimtsev (sometimes also Petr; Russian: Пётр Я́ковлевич Уфи́мцев) (born 1931 in Ust-Charyshskaya Pristan, West Siberian Krai, now Altai Krai) is a Soviet/Russian physicist and mathematician, considered the seminal force behind modern stealth aircraft technology. In the 1960s he began developing equations for predicting the reflection of electromagnetic waves from simple two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects.[1] 😎🇷🇺

    • @02suraditpengsaeng41
      @02suraditpengsaeng41 Рік тому

      I guess same way china got

    • @ddarkon1223
      @ddarkon1223 Рік тому +1

      A russian guy invented stealth, yall are just lucky soviet leadership rejected him

  • @manuel969
    @manuel969 11 місяців тому +1

    For me the BEST FIGHTER JET in the WORLD🔥🔥🔥

  • @user-qy8mj3ur4w
    @user-qy8mj3ur4w 3 місяці тому

    Как Русский заявляю: это мой самый любимый самолëт из всех самолëтов этой компании!

  • @mohammadfarid9712
    @mohammadfarid9712 Рік тому +2

    Greatest fighter jet ever❤❤❤

  • @obALlhashmi
    @obALlhashmi 9 місяців тому

    it's screech is enough to ive you goosebumps

  • @maxdoom3521
    @maxdoom3521 5 місяців тому

    Man, sure is a lot of military espionage experts in here considering they’re all 100% positive on the exact numbers and capabilities of all these foreign aircraft.

  • @goobytron2888
    @goobytron2888 Рік тому +1

    The Russian designers don’t seem to want the pilots to be able to see what’s behind them.

  • @vilhokunttu2977
    @vilhokunttu2977 Рік тому

    Rooster: What the f*uck

  • @mazuro-ni
    @mazuro-ni 4 місяці тому

    Why are civillians debating about military aircrafts? It's a killing machine, nothing to scoff at.

  • @blackcat.19
    @blackcat.19 Рік тому

    So stealthy that not even Russian army can’t see it. Lol 😂

  • @javierdelosandes
    @javierdelosandes 3 місяці тому

    Su 57 eats F planes as snacks!

  • @H.Y1986
    @H.Y1986 2 місяці тому

    Regardless, it is a masterpiece that has beautiful and fierce eyes

  • @rascal.elder6594
    @rascal.elder6594 Рік тому

    SU-57 equipped with Brahmos
    SU-57: let's play hide and seek❤