You are spot on with the advantages of the battery illumination C_Does! I run the TA-110 with a an Aimpoint ACRO on top. It trades a bit of FOV and weight savings for eye relief and battery illumination. The advantage is, not only can I adjust the brightness to the lighting conditions of the target area, I can run it without any illumination at all. This eliminates reticle blowout in sunlight and the need for tape on the fiber optic. You get a crispy, dark reticle for bright conditions. The red dot is also mounted forward where the fiber optic would have been, making it much easier to use for passive aiming through an NVS.
@@christopherkey3488 The main difference is weight and eye relief between the two models. With the shorter eye relief of the TA-02, a lot of guys run them on raised mounts. The piggy-back acro is already higher than the tallest standalone mounts for chin weld and heads up position. With longer eye relief the TA-110 doesn't need a riser.
I love a specific ACOG (TA02) for multiple reasons 1) Mounting, no leveling ect. 2) Unbelievably durable and rugged compared to any optic. 3) Front mounting dot (led only) at 12 o'clock which is perfect for nods 4) BDC reticle that is accurate to 500 and beyond. 5) Lightweight compared too many options. Thanks for the review.
@ that’s like choosing which child. Both are exceptional with the glass clarity. I honestly think the acog. I have the ta02 model with battery illumination and it gets bright enough to combat the sun if you need it. Yes you loose 2 lvls of magnification, but the field of view makes up for that. The short eye relief is the down side for some but I don’t mind it. I ultimately got one because of the review down by delta34 (UA-camr). I see it as a life long investment. I have the acog on a 13.9” PWS alpha it’s perfect for my needs. The creedo is going to be on an 18” spr style rifle.
True growth is realizing the TA11 is the apex ACOG. I hope you can get your mitts on a red crosshair TA11. I’d send you one of mine but I’m too distrustful of mail services these days.
For me the trade offs of the Ta-31 is worth the light weight and durability. Even going to the battery powered model starts to put the weight in line with some lvpo's. The short eye relief just doesn't bother me, but I've seen other shooters struggle with it. I have 2 Ta-31's, 1 Ta-50, and 1 Ta-44. For speed and light weight, a Ta-44 is amazing. 2x does let you punch out a bit further but I can shoot it almost as fast as a red dot. The perfect middle ground is the TA-50 though, and I'd love to see you review one of those. It is lighter than the Ta-11 but has the long eye relief. It's 3x so it almost matches the Ta-11 and Ta-31. It's field of view is decent and not near as good as the TA-31 but much better than any smaller acog. I think a lot of people just don't know how good the Ta-50 is. They even have a 7.62x39 reticle in it for the AK with a low mounting option, and it can still mount a top dot if someone wants. It's half the length and size of a Ta-31. Might be the best acog for short to mid range.
I've witnessed a Kahles LPVO pop its nitrogen seal after a few hundred rounds of being on a 5.56 rifle. I have a really hard time trusting 90% of LPVOs on the market, though the Nightforce ones seem tempting. The ACOG has been the only optic that has never given me a single issue. Some tips to anyone considering an ACOG, If you can't get part the short eye relief or aren't sure if you could there's the 3.5x versions. The TA11 and TA110, that sacrifice a bit of field of view in favor of extra eye relief. That's what I've run for a while and what I personally suggest as the safe option if you're unsure if the short eye relief isn't for you. The LED models are also superior imo because you get a much better res dot mounting spot on it and have full illumination control. No issues of being in a dark area aiming into a light area. Honestly, I prefer a shorter eye relief so that my optic can be mounted further to the rear and thus shift the weight and balance rearward where I personally find that I feel it less. Just some thoughts. I've run it for over a year now with thousands of rounds on multiple guns with it on there and have almost no complaints.
If someone already has a fiber optic ACOG and wants the LED illumination control, Shaffer Machining makes an adjustable fiber optic cover that basically gives a it LED functionality. (At least during the day)
Everyone is always talking about the tritium eventually dying. With real world military usage, I can tell you it's not something to worry about. If the ambient lighting is low enough that you'd need tritium, you would also need white light. In dusky, low light conditions, the fiber optic still works perfectly to illuminate the reticle. In short, used ACOGs are still gtg
You talked about the tracking test of the other acog but didn't show how this one performed. Did it have any of the same issues or did it track normally?
You would benefit from checking out D34. He was mentioned in this video too. He'll tell you everything you wanted to know and has some of the best quality visual aides with graphics, charts, and camera shots that make his review videos more like training videos. My decision to go with the ta02 was largely influenced by his many acog videos. I like most always thought the acog was cool but man, you never realize what a magnificent optic it is until you look through and use one. I absolutely understand now why it was so preferred by many militaries with it's durability, stupid easy usability, simplicity, etc. It's perfect to put in the hands of an 18 year old who's never fired a gun and teach them to shoot. I was concerned about the eye relief but to me it isn't bad at all. It is closer than most any other scope you've probably used but it isn't "bad," especially once you learn where to place your face when drawing. I specifically wanted the top mounted dot opposed to canted. My mindset was that it'd be easier to use with increases capability in awkward positions. I can lay all the way to the left or right and be able to use it vs. only on which side a canted one is one. Plus it's such a small, miniscule movement of the head to go back and forth. I was concerned about it's height over bore but again, after using it its way more intuitive than I was expecting and not difficult at all, and it's FAST. Faster than using a throw lever to change magnification for sure. Never used any other acog but I really like being able to adjust the brightness to match any light level and like that I dont have to worry about tritium eventually dying. It's just a swap of a cheap lithium battery and it's good for another few years. I've really come to love the ta02 acog a lot, that rifle is becoming my favorite to shoot and use.
@@BarnDoor-won5ve Thank you for that summary! Whats most on my want list is the big field of view, and with crosshair. I have the Primary Arms 3x prism, realy like it but i hate the chevron reticle, just cant be friend with it. So a TA02 is the dream scope. Thanks again.
You are missing the final piece (IMO) for ACOG line review. A TA110 would let you review the last of the most common ACOG magnifications but with the battery. It gives you “most” of the eye relief of the TA33 and “most” of the FOV of the TA31. I have owned all 3 and the TA31 is my least favorite based on the tight eye relief. The TA11/TA110 is kind of a jack of all trades ACOG at the expense of added weight/size. I would be happy to loan a TA110, if you are interested let me know I have a TA110J new in the box. Your reviews have helped me immensely over the last couple of years and I would love to help out if I can.
TA11 is better if you want rapid engagement, eyebox is terrific. TA31 better for overwatch role. Both scopes are ideal for 5.56. I have RMR on top even though canted is better because I rarely ever use a RDS and want it out as out of the way as possible. I use my TA11 and GLx 2x more often than TA31. Sold all my LPVO but I might add a Trijicon 1-6x24 SFP based on your excellent review. I also bought the GLx 2x based on your review, which was spot on, love that thing! Thx for the great content!
BTW, D34 Acog reviews are the gold standard but you add an additional perspective that I (and probably many others) value just like Brass Facts and Hop do as well. More info the better. The one Acog for which no good info is available for is the 2x model with crosshair. That reticle is interesting to me because the black cross hair probably won't wash out if you are using bright light at night. Since Trijicon probably rarely sells that model I wonder if they have one they could dust one off and send it to you? Would love the see that before I drop $1000 on it.
I have a poor man’s Acog. A primary arms 3x macro. Not the micro. I feel this optic is slept on. But it’s built well and the eye relief is good enough, and the eye box is great. Have you ever reviewed one C? If not I’d like to see that
On the reticle always being on: you know those 5 diamond targets with moa squares, white background with red ink? That’s what I use to sight in everything. I also can’t have my offhand under the bump stock to help stabilize because it has to cover up the red reticle. Just a pain lmao.
A sleeper scope that doesnt have a lot of hype, reviews, information is the new Sig Sauer Tango DMR 3-18. Hopefully you review it. For everything it has, it weighs around 26oz.
THE ACOG WAS MY FIRST CHOICE A COUPLE MONTHS AGO WHEN BUYING A AE PRECISION.. I WENT WITH A HOLOSUN HS5IOC & HM3X COMBO. IT’S JUST NOT CUTTING IT FOR ME. I WAS WONDERING, IF THE HOLOSUN HS510C RED DOT OPTICAL WOULD FIT ON THE ACOG? I APPRECIATE YOUR HELP ANSWERING THIS QUESTION.. IF YOURE NOT SURE, ITS OK, ILL FIGURE IT OUT. THANKS FOR THE HELP AND GREAT VIDEO!
The TA02 is the best model. Forward mountable red dot, battery powered with off switches in between, same reliability and clarity you come to expect with trijicon. No brainer
This was actually my exact conundrum. I found a PLX-C with an open box deal for $1050. Couldn't pass that deal up. Acogs are old tech too which makes it a tough pill to swallow at $1100. Though I'm certainly happy with my choice, I don't think you'll be unhappy with either.
@korcla5668 $1050 is the dream. Wish I had expendable income as I would use acog on a short barrel mid-range 300yd setup and have a separate 16" for reaching out more like 600yd with a 1-8x...a man can dream
I have an extra sig sauer bravo 5 which I like, but as a poor it’s the only magnified optic I’ve really used. I’d love to send it to you to take a look at if your interested. I’d love to see what you think there isn’t all that much youtube press on it.
"This ACOG technically has three sighting systems in one." Perhaps, but it also has a single point of failure: If that mount breaks or merely comes loose, all those sighting systems riding on it go bye-bye together.
Are their any sites that sell used Military surplus ACOGS ? New flooring comes first after HurricNe clezn up. A surplus deal would not be a bad thing .
I dunno why you keep saying the 'eye relief' on the TA31 is soooo short, you can go between 1.5" and like 5" and still see through most of it. And imo, the actual 'eye relief' of the ACOG Ta31, to me, is closer to 3", with the ability to scoot in a lil closer if you wanna eek out just a lil bit more FOV. I get why Trijicon has 1.5" listed as the eye relief on the ACOG, since that is technically where you get the max FOV, but in practice, you usually use it from further back, and then you can tuck in when you really need to for those longer shots when you're prone or sitting or something
@@Ron-ni8uu I'm joking. The trS 25 is a very Good deal for its price range at one time but it's nowhere in the leauge of an ACOG. I like ACOGs so much I'm buying one even though I need corrective lenses so the reticle looks in focus. Eye pro is required at the range anyways.
I personally hate the ACOG for the insanely short eye relief. Throw on eye pro and you are damn near touching the optic. There are numerous other issues in practical use, but the eye relief is a hard stop.
@@Ron-ni8uu The eye relief is 1.5" in most models. It is absolutely a nightmare to use when moving between firing positions. You can very easily have it kiss your eye pro when shooting.
You are spot on with the advantages of the battery illumination C_Does! I run the TA-110 with a an Aimpoint ACRO on top. It trades a bit of FOV and weight savings for eye relief and battery illumination. The advantage is, not only can I adjust the brightness to the lighting conditions of the target area, I can run it without any illumination at all. This eliminates reticle blowout in sunlight and the need for tape on the fiber optic. You get a crispy, dark reticle for bright conditions. The red dot is also mounted forward where the fiber optic would have been, making it much easier to use for passive aiming through an NVS.
I’m deciding between this exact setup or a ta02 with acro on top
@@christopherkey3488 The main difference is weight and eye relief between the two models. With the shorter eye relief of the TA-02, a lot of guys run them on raised mounts. The piggy-back acro is already higher than the tallest standalone mounts for chin weld and heads up position. With longer eye relief the TA-110 doesn't need a riser.
When someone says "ACOG" they're talking about the TA31 99% of the time
.99
@@justcallmejoeable rightfully so
This is wild. Just last week I was wishing so badly that YT had a comparison video of an ACOG and a P4XI. Thank you sir.
I keep experiencing this I wonder if it's because of the culture shift from Boomers to more actual gun people
So what’s your conclusion? What you getting?
You hear that kids? Brown!!!
Baby poop brown!
My first comment to Hop is going to be, 💩
Wish it had a forward mount for the dot 🫤
@@christopherkey3488 TA02
I love a specific ACOG (TA02) for multiple reasons 1) Mounting, no leveling ect. 2) Unbelievably durable and rugged compared to any optic. 3) Front mounting dot (led only) at 12 o'clock which is perfect for nods 4) BDC reticle that is accurate to 500 and beyond. 5) Lightweight compared too many options.
Thanks for the review.
TA-110 for me. Mid mount top dot
I bought an ACOG even though I have a 1-6 trijicon creedo FFP. It was something I have always wanted as a kid and I love it.
If you had to choose between the ACOG and the Credo which would you choose?
@ that’s like choosing which child. Both are exceptional with the glass clarity. I honestly think the acog. I have the ta02 model with battery illumination and it gets bright enough to combat the sun if you need it. Yes you loose 2 lvls of magnification, but the field of view makes up for that. The short eye relief is the down side for some but I don’t mind it. I ultimately got one because of the review down by delta34 (UA-camr). I see it as a life long investment. I have the acog on a 13.9” PWS alpha it’s perfect for my needs. The creedo is going to be on an 18” spr style rifle.
@ I’m really having a hard time deciding between the 1-6 credo SFP or the TA02. Thanks for your suggestion
@@roymercer1417 I feel you man. It’s a hard choice. I’m glad to have helped
@@roymercer1417right there with you. C_Does gives huge props to the credo spf. Tough decision man.
Best optic channel on YT! Keep up the good work
True growth is realizing the TA11 is the apex ACOG. I hope you can get your mitts on a red crosshair TA11.
I’d send you one of mine but I’m too distrustful of mail services these days.
*TA44
A 1.5x that makes moving to and hitting multiple targets at 300 yards seem easy.
Nah, that’s theTA02
Also voting the ta11 and its longer eye relief.
@ My favorite part about it.
@@andrewfolk5283I wish these were cheap priced like primary arms 😂
The veterans day gift we all deserved.
You should review the ta110 next. It’s the best combination of eye relief and field of view + it has battery powered illumination.
Ahhh sheeeiiittt c_does dropped the acog review
Trijcon is my goto optics. 🎉🎉. Great video🎉🎉
For me the trade offs of the Ta-31 is worth the light weight and durability. Even going to the battery powered model starts to put the weight in line with some lvpo's. The short eye relief just doesn't bother me, but I've seen other shooters struggle with it. I have 2 Ta-31's, 1 Ta-50, and 1 Ta-44. For speed and light weight, a Ta-44 is amazing. 2x does let you punch out a bit further but I can shoot it almost as fast as a red dot. The perfect middle ground is the TA-50 though, and I'd love to see you review one of those. It is lighter than the Ta-11 but has the long eye relief. It's 3x so it almost matches the Ta-11 and Ta-31. It's field of view is decent and not near as good as the TA-31 but much better than any smaller acog. I think a lot of people just don't know how good the Ta-50 is. They even have a 7.62x39 reticle in it for the AK with a low mounting option, and it can still mount a top dot if someone wants. It's half the length and size of a Ta-31. Might be the best acog for short to mid range.
I've witnessed a Kahles LPVO pop its nitrogen seal after a few hundred rounds of being on a 5.56 rifle. I have a really hard time trusting 90% of LPVOs on the market, though the Nightforce ones seem tempting. The ACOG has been the only optic that has never given me a single issue.
Some tips to anyone considering an ACOG, If you can't get part the short eye relief or aren't sure if you could there's the 3.5x versions. The TA11 and TA110, that sacrifice a bit of field of view in favor of extra eye relief. That's what I've run for a while and what I personally suggest as the safe option if you're unsure if the short eye relief isn't for you. The LED models are also superior imo because you get a much better res dot mounting spot on it and have full illumination control. No issues of being in a dark area aiming into a light area.
Honestly, I prefer a shorter eye relief so that my optic can be mounted further to the rear and thus shift the weight and balance rearward where I personally find that I feel it less.
Just some thoughts. I've run it for over a year now with thousands of rounds on multiple guns with it on there and have almost no complaints.
Hell yeah. Been waiting for this one
Just bought one of these like a month ago for my AUG. Exact one lol. Works really well for the AUG.
If someone already has a fiber optic ACOG and wants the LED illumination control, Shaffer Machining makes an adjustable fiber optic cover that basically gives a it LED functionality. (At least during the day)
They actually emailed me when the version for the 3.5x acog came out!
The browe bto would also be interesting to look at
The not-COG of choice
Interested to hear if they fulfill orders as ordered now, or wait til they have a contract still
Everyone is always talking about the tritium eventually dying. With real world military usage, I can tell you it's not something to worry about. If the ambient lighting is low enough that you'd need tritium, you would also need white light. In dusky, low light conditions, the fiber optic still works perfectly to illuminate the reticle. In short, used ACOGs are still gtg
So is it worth buying a 15 year old Acog TA 01 jp800 Reticle knowing the tridium is dead. What price would one pay?
@ I don’t know what reticle that is. But yes, a used acog is worth buying. The price is up to you to decide
I use a dot on a TA31 as well. I find it easier to use a chinweld instead of canting the rifle. Especially using it in closer ranges.
Man I really wanna buy a TA02 and send it to you. When I grab one I’ll reach out.
Solid review again!! Is this one of the Blue Mountain Sportsman Center shooting ranges?? Sure looks like the large bore range in a few shots lol. 🇺🇸
My beloved TA31
Best gpr optic
Sorry your experience with Trijicon was bad they have taken care of me on multiple occasions
You talked about the tracking test of the other acog but didn't show how this one performed. Did it have any of the same issues or did it track normally?
Please do a review on the ACOG TA02. Where i live i cant even go to a store to check it out, and order it are 2200 dollar. Thanks in advance!
It will just be this with battery illumination and a forward mounted dot. Also add about 4 oz for a battery and the electronics
@ghijkl Thank you for info!
You would benefit from checking out D34. He was mentioned in this video too.
He'll tell you everything you wanted to know and has some of the best quality visual aides with graphics, charts, and camera shots that make his review videos more like training videos.
My decision to go with the ta02 was largely influenced by his many acog videos.
I like most always thought the acog was cool but man, you never realize what a magnificent optic it is until you look through and use one. I absolutely understand now why it was so preferred by many militaries with it's durability, stupid easy usability, simplicity, etc. It's perfect to put in the hands of an 18 year old who's never fired a gun and teach them to shoot.
I was concerned about the eye relief but to me it isn't bad at all. It is closer than most any other scope you've probably used but it isn't "bad," especially once you learn where to place your face when drawing.
I specifically wanted the top mounted dot opposed to canted. My mindset was that it'd be easier to use with increases capability in awkward positions. I can lay all the way to the left or right and be able to use it vs. only on which side a canted one is one. Plus it's such a small, miniscule movement of the head to go back and forth. I was concerned about it's height over bore but again, after using it its way more intuitive than I was expecting and not difficult at all, and it's FAST. Faster than using a throw lever to change magnification for sure.
Never used any other acog but I really like being able to adjust the brightness to match any light level and like that I dont have to worry about tritium eventually dying. It's just a swap of a cheap lithium battery and it's good for another few years.
I've really come to love the ta02 acog a lot, that rifle is becoming my favorite to shoot and use.
@@BarnDoor-won5ve Thank you for that summary! Whats most on my want list is the big field of view, and with crosshair. I have the Primary Arms 3x prism, realy like it but i hate the chevron reticle, just cant be friend with it. So a TA02 is the dream scope. Thanks again.
Man of culture @@BarnDoor-won5ve
Perfect, down to miniscule, minute details.
Can you ask your friend where did he find those scope covers?
@@ridnthawave708 onehundred concepts. I have the same one’s and they are great.
One hundred concepts
Thank you
What are those lens caps, where do I get one?
One hundred concepts
@@nathoniel01 Appreciate that.
You are missing the final piece (IMO) for ACOG line review. A TA110 would let you review the last of the most common ACOG magnifications but with the battery.
It gives you “most” of the eye relief of the TA33 and “most” of the FOV of the TA31. I have owned all 3 and the TA31 is my least favorite based on the tight eye relief. The TA11/TA110 is kind of a jack of all trades ACOG at the expense of added weight/size.
I would be happy to loan a TA110, if you are interested let me know I have a TA110J new in the box. Your reviews have helped me immensely over the last couple of years and I would love to help out if I can.
TA11 is better if you want rapid engagement, eyebox is terrific. TA31 better for overwatch role. Both scopes are ideal for 5.56. I have RMR on top even though canted is better because I rarely ever use a RDS and want it out as out of the way as possible.
I use my TA11 and GLx 2x more often than TA31. Sold all my LPVO but I might add a Trijicon 1-6x24 SFP based on your excellent review. I also bought the GLx 2x based on your review, which was spot on, love that thing!
Thx for the great content!
BTW, D34 Acog reviews are the gold standard but you add an additional perspective that I (and probably many others) value just like Brass Facts and Hop do as well. More info the better.
The one Acog for which no good info is available for is the 2x model with crosshair. That reticle is interesting to me because the black cross hair probably won't wash out if you are using bright light at night. Since Trijicon probably rarely sells that model I wonder if they have one they could dust one off and send it to you? Would love the see that before I drop $1000 on it.
@c_does what do you think of the Steiner H6Xi 2-12x42mm STR-MIL compared to the Athlon 2x12?
Ta31 definitely still has a place in the current world of optics. I love my ta31rcoa4.
I have a poor man’s Acog. A primary arms 3x macro. Not the micro. I feel this optic is slept on. But it’s built well and the eye relief is good enough, and the eye box is great. Have you ever reviewed one C? If not I’d like to see that
On the reticle always being on: you know those 5 diamond targets with moa squares, white background with red ink? That’s what I use to sight in everything. I also can’t have my offhand under the bump stock to help stabilize because it has to cover up the red reticle. Just a pain lmao.
A sleeper scope that doesnt have a lot of hype, reviews, information is the new Sig Sauer Tango DMR 3-18. Hopefully you review it. For everything it has, it weighs around 26oz.
THE ACOG WAS MY FIRST CHOICE A COUPLE MONTHS AGO WHEN BUYING A AE PRECISION.. I WENT WITH A HOLOSUN HS5IOC & HM3X COMBO. IT’S JUST NOT CUTTING IT FOR ME. I WAS WONDERING, IF THE HOLOSUN HS510C RED DOT OPTICAL WOULD FIT ON THE ACOG? I APPRECIATE YOUR HELP ANSWERING THIS QUESTION.. IF YOURE NOT SURE, ITS OK, ILL FIGURE IT OUT. THANKS FOR THE HELP AND GREAT VIDEO!
Brother if you compare the TA31 to the TA11 it would settle an age old argument. That video would be legendary
would have loved to see it compared to the HAMR 4x scope. At one time, they were competitors and both used on mil rifles
You didn't discuss the parallax 5:56 that reticle distortion is quite pronounced
The TA02 is the best model. Forward mountable red dot, battery powered with off switches in between, same reliability and clarity you come to expect with trijicon. No brainer
How does the Field of View compare to an 1-6 or higher LPVO set to a mid-level 4x magnification?
So hard deciding between PA PLX- C 1-8X and ACOG.
This was actually my exact conundrum. I found a PLX-C with an open box deal for $1050. Couldn't pass that deal up. Acogs are old tech too which makes it a tough pill to swallow at $1100. Though I'm certainly happy with my choice, I don't think you'll be unhappy with either.
@korcla5668 $1050 is the dream. Wish I had expendable income as I would use acog on a short barrel mid-range 300yd setup and have a separate 16" for reaching out more like 600yd with a 1-8x...a man can dream
Hey, I’d like to send in one of my prism optics in for you to review!
I have an extra sig sauer bravo 5 which I like, but as a poor it’s the only magnified optic I’ve really used. I’d love to send it to you to take a look at if your interested. I’d love to see what you think there isn’t all that much youtube press on it.
Good or bad. Its comfy.
I know my way around an ACOG
i like the reticle...
Plz plz review the ta11 3.5x and compare it. It's a bit heavier but has a much better eye relief and eye box. Would love to get you comparison
Hello！ How to work together please ?
Anyone know who makes the scope covers?
One hundred concepts
Really want to see him review a TA02 red or green horseshoe model
"This ACOG technically has three sighting systems in one."
Perhaps, but it also has a single point of failure: If that mount breaks or merely comes loose, all those sighting systems riding on it go bye-bye together.
Well no shit lol
TA02 led solves all the issue of ta31 with just. Abit more weight
Are their any sites that sell used Military surplus ACOGS ? New flooring comes first after HurricNe clezn up. A surplus deal would not be a bad thing .
I have one, its awsome
I like the ta-33 😢
I dunno why you keep saying the 'eye relief' on the TA31 is soooo short, you can go between 1.5" and like 5" and still see through most of it. And imo, the actual 'eye relief' of the ACOG Ta31, to me, is closer to 3", with the ability to scoot in a lil closer if you wanna eek out just a lil bit more FOV. I get why Trijicon has 1.5" listed as the eye relief on the ACOG, since that is technically where you get the max FOV, but in practice, you usually use it from further back, and then you can tuck in when you really need to for those longer shots when you're prone or sitting or something
The favorite color of Chris Barnes from six feet under.
Ha. Face reveal!
Still not as good as my Bushnell TRS-25
No finer optic in existence.
Such glass. Truly an optical solution that exists.
Is the Bushnell good or are you joking tell me about the good stuff the Bushnell has I am interested
@@Ron-ni8uu I'm joking. The trS 25 is a very Good deal for its price range at one time but it's nowhere in the leauge of an ACOG. I like ACOGs so much I'm buying one even though I need corrective lenses so the reticle looks in focus. Eye pro is required at the range anyways.
Change your logo back!
Bought my first acog yesterday (TA31-CH) to hopefully replace my budget lpvo
+
I'll pay you 50$ for it 🤣😎
I personally hate the ACOG for the insanely short eye relief. Throw on eye pro and you are damn near touching the optic. There are numerous other issues in practical use, but the eye relief is a hard stop.
I never used one just fantasizing one does the eye relief super suck. Let me know very interesting
Looks like the steiner s432 destroys everything for eye relief 3.5 inches thanks for bringing this eye relief issue up. You are right
Im 5'10" and didnt have any issues with one mounted on an M16A4. The issue is overstated imo
@@Ron-ni8uu The eye relief is 1.5" in most models. It is absolutely a nightmare to use when moving between firing positions. You can very easily have it kiss your eye pro when shooting.
@LtLemontwist that eye relief destroys it against primary arms acss.that reticle is perfect