Brilliant review. Just bought Aug 2023 and your video expanded my understanding greatly - features etc. Didn’t notice the safety whistle on pack that you mentioned? Little toggle with fastener under the water bag toggle handy for? Many thanks.
Good review. Thanks. Would be interested to see more about the security as it seems it can be opened even if the single top lock is padlocked. I am thinking about airport/checked scenarios.
I went with this pack for my check in / massive haul pack. Its so versatile because I can use its giant size to move all my stuff to my new home. I can also use it for going camping and live off of if I buy a small tent and sleeping bag. It's a lot more space and better carrying loads on long hikes than the Farpoint and most other bags and it also doesn't look out of place in the city or train stations like a traditional hiking pack and unlike hiking packs it opens like a luggage. Its a very unique Hybrid bag that its basically a jack of all trades for the long haul. I wonder why nobody talks about it.
@@trekitt Thank you, you have the best review on this pack that is so under appreciated. Also I would like to ask, is the color in person a bright blue like yours? because I see different images of the same color that goes from Dark turquoise blue that looks close to black, to Bright royal blue like yours. Are there two different shades of blue?
Can anyone help??? I have this bag but cannot seem to find a way to lock the bottom compartment. Surely this defeats the point of having lockable zips on the main compartment? Any advice would be greatly appreciated! Great review!
Hi would this pack be good for doing 60 miles over 5 days in Patagonia or should I opt for an Osprey pack with their anti-gravity system i.e. the Aether? My total trip length is 4 weeks and I will be doing some city travel as well as this 5 day trek. This pack seems more versatile than the Aether, but I also don't want to be stuck in the middle of a 4 day trek with an uncomfortable pack, since I am 53 years old! I suppose my question is how much comfort and body wear and tear would I sacrifice with this pack? Thanks and great video!
Hi Rob, I would personally take the Aether and be confident that I'd be comfortable and secure during the trek. Whilst the Aether may not be as "versatile" in the city, it'll work just fine, and more importantly, you'll enjoy your trek more and be more comfortable.
Thanks for the amazing and detailed review! I've just one question, it's possible to carry-on this backpack (75l) not fully loaded? I know it's possible with other models like (Stratos 50l), moreover the maximum dimensions are pretty the same.
We can't say for sure as each airline has different carry-on dimensions, but we'd air on the side of caution and say no. The largest we'd safely take on almost any airline is the Farpoint 40.
This will depend on your airline of choice, but in our experience most airlines will consider this too large for carry-on into the cabin and you would have to check it. But as always, your mileage may vary.
Hi Trekitt, I'm wondering if you could help me choose between two backpacks. I am going on a campsite hopping holiday in summer and I would prefer not having to buy a travel backpack for it and then a hiking backpack in the future for when I go hiking, I'd ideally want a backpack that could do both. The good things about Farpoint Trek 75 is it has compatibility with Osprey's daylite systems with female clips on the front etc, front access and is somewhat competent at hiking, not often the case of travel backpacks. The bad things about the Farpoint Trek 75 is that its suspension system is from a lower tier Osprey collection and it does not have top access which in cases where I don't want to open the whole bag up, eg when raining, is useful. The good things about the Aether AG 70 is it is more suited to carrying a tent and stove etc around in terms of packing space, it has top and front access even if the front is only a j format and it has one of the best suspension systems Osprey currently offer. The bad things about the Aether AG 70 are that it is not user friendly to strapping a day pack to it (useful for airports) and is currently, as the Farpoint is on sale, £100 more. Please could you advise?
Hi Isaac, choosing between the two is not easy as they are completely different packs, designed for completely different purposes. My only advice is that I'd much rather be more comfortable when hiking for hours with all my kit in the pack, than have a slightly more convenient travel bag. Think about when you'll be using the pack the most and buy the one that suits those times. If all your time is spent travelling, then go for the Farpoint, if most of your time is spent hiking, then go for the Aerther. Better still, save up for a bit longer and get both! Paul.
Yes, the suitability of the bag is determined by your torso length and not your height. Have a look at this video to understand how to fit a rucksack..ua-cam.com/video/Sl1yJakKp-4/v-deo.html
Bought one of these for very cheap 130usd (used), probably overkill since I mainly do day hikes, but hard to pass on a good deal on a company with good warranty. will be my first fancy backpack. usually just go on day trips but since im carrying most of my girlfriends stuff im sure ill put it to good use lol. Maybe this will put me past my comfort zone to do multi day hikes.
Very nice review! I am interesting on buying this. I have seen lots of people saying it is for both mountaineering hiking and holidays. I want something for both. Would you recommend buying it or finding something smaller? I go multi days hiking and I carry all my equipment, food etc on my own. Also I want this for multi-days holidays. Is this a good choice or I should check something such as OSPREY RENN 65?
The pack works well for both travel and hiking. Ultimately the decision lies with you on the balance of features. Something like the Renn 65 is smaller, but is a more hiking focused pack, so maybe less suited to the holiday travel, but would still work in a travel environment. Working out how much you need to pack/carry and how you want to access the pack are important in making your decision between the two packs you mention.
Hey there. Thanks for the great videos. Wondering on the differences between womens and mens farpoint/fair view. Is it only the litre size, or are there build differences that mean men should only get the 55/75l versions? Thanks!
Hi. I am torn between buying the Trek55 or the Trek75. My partners view is buy the larger to sort of future proof it for longer trips. My view is we are usually only away for 2 week at a time and i dont want to be lugging a bigger pack than necessary. I guess if i can be convinced that the 75 compression straps will crush it down to a 55 like size then that might convince me. Thoughts on this please. Also should I assume that the 75 is simply larger in terms of length for the extra 20L? Thank you for a great video. PS. This is all about our intensions to move to trekking trips/holidays rather than our wheelie days!
Hi Betterdays123, Thanks for getting in touch. Yes, you will be able to take a lot of the extra volume out of the 75 by using the compression straps, however, we all know that the more space you have the more tempted you are to pack more. So, it depends on how strict you are with your kit choice, how small you kit packs down to already and if you want to keep it as lightweight as possible. The 75 is mainly longer but will slightly vary in all dimensions. I hope this helps, Will,
@@SamuelGarcia-rf4th Looking back at what our customers have chosen over the last few years, it looks like the 75 was the winner. Guess everyone wanted to carry more kit with them. We now only stock the 75, so today this debate would be a little different from us!
I see you clarified this is the Petrol Blue, does it look more royal or classic blue in person? The pictures on the Osprey site looks nothing like your video. Thanks in advance, and for the video!
Great review! I bought myself a Kestrel pack 2 months ago but this one will suite me much better to my needs. Unfortunately it’s out of the return period, this one launched just to late for me :)
It depends what you're doing with the bag. The Farpoint Trek is a trekking bag which also works for travel, whereas the Farpoint 70 is a travel bag which also works for a little trekking. If you're primarily travelling and only require the bag to go on your back for short periods of time (2 hours and under), then the Farpoint 70 is fine. If you're after a trekking bag which can also double up as your travel bag, go for the Trek.
Hello, i watch your film about the Osprey Farpoint and i bought one. You can also put a daylighttravel pack on it not only on the front, but also on the bagack itself and perhaps you can make a instyruction add on film. Gr.Ronald RoOnTheGo Globetrotter
Hi, Osprey give this pack a load range of 9 to 23kg. But I'd try to keep the weight as low as possible to make carrying the pack as comfortable and enjoyable as possible. Paul.
You're welcome. I'm afraid the Farpoint Trek doesn't have walking pole holders. You could pop them into the side mesh pockets and fasten to the pack with the side compression straps; you'd just have to make sure the poles had some protective tips on. Harry
Thank you for the review. Do you recommend this over the Osprey farpoint70? What are the differences? Can I attach Osprey 40 to it as a daily backpack!
The main difference is the Trek has a far more substantial backsystem, making it suitable for both travel and light trekking, whereas the standard Farpoint is more of a travel pack and not suitable for long distance walking. As far as I'm aware, there's no native way to attach the Farpoint 40, but you can attach a Daylight Travel. Regards, Harry.
May I ask how tall is Paul here? I'm 178cm and thinking of buying the Fairview Trek 70. Most people tell me it's a huge pack but I'm a tall woman and if it looks like it does on Paul, I think it wouldn't look that huge on me.
@@trekitt thank you for the reply. I might even go for the Farpoint Trek since the women's fit I tried with other Osprey models cut into my collarbones.
Hi Mattia, the size of bag really depends on how much stuff you usually pack. Personally, I can get away with a small bag as I travel light, but my wife always takes a bigger bag as she likes to take more stuff. The difference between the two sizes is only 15 litres, about the size of a small daysack. The danger with a bigger bag is that you will be tempted to pack more and the bag will be heavier.
thanks a lot for your video! I just bougth this bag a few days ago beacause i'm going on a trip for the next 6 month in south america and your video has confermed that it was a good choice. ^^ just a quick question, where do you think is the best place to attach the tent on this bag ? cheers from france
Hi there, thank you for the genuinely awesome and comprehensive review (best I've seen so far). I'm planning a 7 night camping trip in a couple months but have no idea whether I should get the 75 or 55 version of the Farpoint Trek and was wondering which you would recommend?
Personally I would opt for the 55 as I know my tent, stove, sleeping bag and mat are all relatively light and will pack down fairly small. It largely depends on the pack size of the four items above and whether you'll also be carrying water or whether you're able to stop and fill up regularly. Kind regards, Harry.
@@trekitt Excellent! Thank you so much! Just to clarify, are you able to fit everything you mentioned inside the 55L pack itself or are you strapping, the tent for example, to the outside?
I imagine it'll be fine. Generally we'd ask for your back length measurements and compare against the length of the pack, but Osprey don't seem to provide these details and we have none left in stock to measure. Paul is taller than you but has a comparatively short back length, so you won't be a million miles off.
Could FT 55 or even 75, be suitable for routes like Camino or some middle or light mountaineering? (Experience with Fairpoint 70 for Urban travelling )
For trail walking it'll be fine, but we wouldn't recommend it for mountaineering as it doesn't have a lot of essential features found in some of Osprey's more technical packs.
Nope, I'd look at a true trekking pack for DofE. The Farpoint is a travel pack that also works for a bit of hiking, so it's not the best option for multi-day trekking trips. Take a look at the Osprey Kestrel - it comes in a bunch of different sizes and is currently 25% off on our website: www.trekitt.co.uk/facetresults.aspx?Term=Kestrel
It'll definitely have enough space; possibly even too much depending on the size and weight of your tent, sleeping bag, sleeping mat and cook system. I'd recommend either ordering a few sizes and packing your kit into both to determine which is more suitable, or visit us for a wider range. Harry
@@trekittHi. Thanka for getting back. Tent is either my Zephyros 1 or my Helium 100 with footprint..sleeping bag is a megasleep 25/40 , mat is an exped megalite plus (outside strap on) with a lightweight inflateable not yet bought ,cook system is my Primus x lite with extra mug and plate. ( for P/W next year all this is) Trying to be weight coscious as i'm type 1 Diab. and taking the little dog so will have slightly more pack weight in food and medication..For that reason , i bought a E/hike trek 85 , as it was silly cheap at £30 quid and silly light at 1.3kg and if i just get the P/W out of it then ive had my moneys worth juat with that , but seeing the vid of the F/P 75 and the Rook 65 , i'm thinking get either and at only 30 £quid , keep the E/hike 85 as a good spare. The F/P 75 looks excellebt on the video but the 2.74 kg weight puts me off a bit ( This is what i mean about would be helpfull sayiing what the weights are when doing the videos) whereas the Rook 65 comes in at 1.7kg..which is still 400g more than my Trek 85 , but a lot more quality and features .Trying for a total of 12kg ish as a ballpark with 3-4 days of food , stocked up along the way (no frying stuff , to much extra weight unleas its a pub oe cafe ) So..(phew !) Would the Rook 65 be a better bet than the F/P 75 and would it be big enough ? No use asking Paul Messner he pulls his face if its under a Grand in price ! 😄
@@tomhamer7838 The Rook or Kestrel from Osprey will be a more suitable option for what you're doing. They're 'proper' trekking packs and not adapted from a travel pack, so they're lighter and arguably more comfortable when loaded up. Both the Kestrel 68 and Rook 65 will have enough space if packed correctly. The additional weight over your trek 85 will be largely down to the backsystem; something that you won't notice at all thanks to the additional comfort it'll offer. I used the Kestrel 68 for a three-day trek with tent, food, water, etc and it was more than large enough and far more comfortable than I expected, even after days of use. The Rook is just as comfortable (in my opinion) and will serve a similar purpose. Harry
@@weitao9244 The Aircover is lockable. Which model you go for depends mostly on your back length rather than your overall height, so we'd recommend either trying both on in person or ordering both and returning the one which doesn't fit.
Paul your rucksack reviews are the best. But 3 things: 1. what are the weights empty and full? 2. How does it look on you?(you're getting there with other vids) 3. I don't want to be reminded of my tummy so don't show me yours.
The Trek weighs 2.1kg when empty; unfortunately we didn't weigh the bag when Paul had it packed, but obviously it depends where/how far you're going and if you're going to be packing sleeping equipment. We'll make a note to do a few shots of Paul wearing the pack next time; we remembered for the Farpoint Wheels but not the Trek.... Doh!
@@lilachu7654 I purchased this pack in an official Osprey store in Malaysia, and mine does have a lockable zipper. However, only the main zipper for the top compartment is lockable. The zipper on the lower compartment is not lockable.
The latest version of the Farpoint Trek: www.trekitt.co.uk/facetresults.aspx?Term=farpoint%20trek%2075
Hey Paul, thanks for this great review. You just did a perfect review of every aspect of the bag. Thanks a lot!
Brilliant review. Just bought Aug 2023 and your video expanded my understanding greatly - features etc. Didn’t notice the safety whistle on pack that you mentioned? Little toggle with fastener under the water bag toggle handy for? Many thanks.
Great review. I’m buying one 😀. Thanks for taking the time to post this, very useful. 👍
This is a really helpful review. Thanks
Good review. Thanks. Would be interested to see more about the security as it seems it can be opened even if the single top lock is padlocked. I am thinking about airport/checked scenarios.
I went with this pack for my check in / massive haul pack. Its so versatile because I can use its giant size to move all my stuff to my new home. I can also use it for going camping and live off of if I buy a small tent and sleeping bag.
It's a lot more space and better carrying loads on long hikes than the Farpoint and most other bags and it also doesn't look out of place in the city or train stations like a traditional hiking pack and unlike hiking packs it opens like a luggage.
Its a very unique Hybrid bag that its basically a jack of all trades for the long haul. I wonder why nobody talks about it.
All good points about a great pack! Thanks for watching. Paul.
@@trekitt Thank you, you have the best review on this pack that is so under appreciated. Also I would like to ask, is the color in person a bright blue like yours? because I see different images of the same color that goes from Dark turquoise blue that looks close to black, to Bright royal blue like yours. Are there two different shades of blue?
Thanks for the review. Could you do a size comparison with the 55l Trek please
Great video. Super helpful.
Can anyone help???
I have this bag but cannot seem to find a way to lock the bottom compartment.
Surely this defeats the point of having lockable zips on the main compartment?
Any advice would be greatly appreciated!
Great review!
Hi would this pack be good for doing 60 miles over 5 days in Patagonia or should I opt for an Osprey pack with their anti-gravity system i.e. the Aether? My total trip length is 4 weeks and I will be doing some city travel as well as this 5 day trek. This pack seems more versatile than the Aether, but I also don't want to be stuck in the middle of a 4 day trek with an uncomfortable pack, since I am 53 years old! I suppose my question is how much comfort and body wear and tear would I sacrifice with this pack? Thanks and great video!
Hi Rob, I would personally take the Aether and be confident that I'd be comfortable and secure during the trek. Whilst the Aether may not be as "versatile" in the city, it'll work just fine, and more importantly, you'll enjoy your trek more and be more comfortable.
Good point about the air cover to protect from baggage handlers.
Hi, thanks for watching and glad to hear that you found our tips useful. Paul.
Thanks for the amazing and detailed review!
I've just one question, it's possible to carry-on this backpack (75l) not fully loaded? I know it's possible with other models like (Stratos 50l), moreover the maximum dimensions are pretty the same.
We can't say for sure as each airline has different carry-on dimensions, but we'd air on the side of caution and say no. The largest we'd safely take on almost any airline is the Farpoint 40.
Hi Paul, great review. I was wondering if this Farpoint 75L fits as a cabin bag for travel. Tranks
This will depend on your airline of choice, but in our experience most airlines will consider this too large for carry-on into the cabin and you would have to check it. But as always, your mileage may vary.
Merci beaucoup pour ta vidéo. Very rich in informations ! Salutations from France
Hi Trekitt, I'm wondering if you could help me choose between two backpacks.
I am going on a campsite hopping holiday in summer and I would prefer not having to buy a travel backpack for it and then a hiking backpack in the future for when I go hiking, I'd ideally want a backpack that could do both.
The good things about Farpoint Trek 75 is it has compatibility with Osprey's daylite systems with female clips on the front etc, front access and is somewhat competent at hiking, not often the case of travel backpacks.
The bad things about the Farpoint Trek 75 is that its suspension system is from a lower tier Osprey collection and it does not have top access which in cases where I don't want to open the whole bag up, eg when raining, is useful.
The good things about the Aether AG 70 is it is more suited to carrying a tent and stove etc around in terms of packing space, it has top and front access even if the front is only a j format and it has one of the best suspension systems Osprey currently offer.
The bad things about the Aether AG 70 are that it is not user friendly to strapping a day pack to it (useful for airports) and is currently, as the Farpoint is on sale, £100 more.
Please could you advise?
Hi Isaac, choosing between the two is not easy as they are completely different packs, designed for completely different purposes. My only advice is that I'd much rather be more comfortable when hiking for hours with all my kit in the pack, than have a slightly more convenient travel bag.
Think about when you'll be using the pack the most and buy the one that suits those times. If all your time is spent travelling, then go for the Farpoint, if most of your time is spent hiking, then go for the Aerther. Better still, save up for a bit longer and get both! Paul.
How much does the top squish down when it's not full? If I packed it 60% full, could it squeeze into the overhead bin on a plane?
It doesn't really squish down at all unfortunately as it has a stiff frame and suspended backpanel, so we wouldn't take it as carry-on.
Hi.. For 163cm & 64kg weight its suitable for me or not? Thanks..
Yes, the suitability of the bag is determined by your torso length and not your height. Have a look at this video to understand how to fit a rucksack..ua-cam.com/video/Sl1yJakKp-4/v-deo.html
Bought one of these for very cheap 130usd (used), probably overkill since I mainly do day hikes, but hard to pass on a good deal on a company with good warranty. will be my first fancy backpack. usually just go on day trips but since im carrying most of my girlfriends stuff im sure ill put it to good use lol. Maybe this will put me past my comfort zone to do multi day hikes.
Very nice review! I am interesting on buying this. I have seen lots of people saying it is for both mountaineering hiking and holidays. I want something for both. Would you recommend buying it or finding something smaller? I go multi days hiking and I carry all my equipment, food etc on my own. Also I want this for multi-days holidays. Is this a good choice or I should check something such as OSPREY RENN 65?
The pack works well for both travel and hiking. Ultimately the decision lies with you on the balance of features. Something like the Renn 65 is smaller, but is a more hiking focused pack, so maybe less suited to the holiday travel, but would still work in a travel environment. Working out how much you need to pack/carry and how you want to access the pack are important in making your decision between the two packs you mention.
Hey there. Thanks for the great videos. Wondering on the differences between womens and mens farpoint/fair view. Is it only the litre size, or are there build differences that mean men should only get the 55/75l versions? Thanks!
Just sizing, most notably the back length. The length is shorter for the women's packs to suit an average shorter back length.
This is great! I hope this is available in Philippines soon
Hi. I am torn between buying the Trek55 or the Trek75. My partners view is buy the larger to sort of future proof it for longer trips. My view is we are usually only away for 2 week at a time and i dont want to be lugging a bigger pack than necessary. I guess if i can be convinced that the 75 compression straps will crush it down to a 55 like size then that might convince me.
Thoughts on this please.
Also should I assume that the 75 is simply larger in terms of length for the extra 20L?
Thank you for a great video.
PS. This is all about our intensions to move to trekking trips/holidays rather than our wheelie days!
Hi Betterdays123,
Thanks for getting in touch. Yes, you will be able to take a lot of the extra volume out of the 75 by using the compression straps, however, we all know that the more space you have the more tempted you are to pack more. So, it depends on how strict you are with your kit choice, how small you kit packs down to already and if you want to keep it as lightweight as possible. The 75 is mainly longer but will slightly vary in all dimensions.
I hope this helps,
Will,
Did you end up getting either backpack? I’m in the same situation.
@@trekittcurious your same question 4 years later. Lol. Did you go for the larger 75l?
@@SamuelGarcia-rf4th Looking back at what our customers have chosen over the last few years, it looks like the 75 was the winner. Guess everyone wanted to carry more kit with them.
We now only stock the 75, so today this debate would be a little different from us!
Would you recommend this for a 3 week bus and hike trip to Peru/Machu Picchu?
I'd choose a proper trekking pack. Something like the Kestrel 68 would be a better option. Harry
Which is better backpack between Osprey Atmos 50 AG vs Osprey Farpoint Trek 55 for trekking???
Atmos!
I see you clarified this is the Petrol Blue, does it look more royal or classic blue in person? The pictures on the Osprey site looks nothing like your video. Thanks in advance, and for the video!
Hi, the Farpoint Trek is certainly blue, more of a classic blue. Different lighting and screen resolutions etc can distort colours. Paul.
Great review! I bought myself a Kestrel pack 2 months ago but this one will suite me much better to my needs. Unfortunately it’s out of the return period, this one launched just to late for me :)
Grear informative videos that you do , vut would be helpful to say what the weight of the packs are as you describe them.
Fair point!
Thanks for the great review!
Hi, I have just ordered the Farpoint 80 as it was in the sale. Is it worth spending the extra and getting the new trek 75? Thanks.
It depends what you're doing with the bag. The Farpoint Trek is a trekking bag which also works for travel, whereas the Farpoint 70 is a travel bag which also works for a little trekking. If you're primarily travelling and only require the bag to go on your back for short periods of time (2 hours and under), then the Farpoint 70 is fine. If you're after a trekking bag which can also double up as your travel bag, go for the Trek.
Thanks for the great review!
Could you attach the raptor 10/14 hydration pack instead of the daylite?
Thanks!
Afraid not as it has no upper compression straps.
Hello, i watch your film about the Osprey Farpoint and i bought one. You can also put a daylighttravel pack on it not only on the front, but also on the bagack itself and perhaps you can make a instyruction add on film. Gr.Ronald RoOnTheGo Globetrotter
Thanks for your comments.
I would like to know how much weight it can carry? Thanks!
Hi, Osprey give this pack a load range of 9 to 23kg. But I'd try to keep the weight as low as possible to make carrying the pack as comfortable and enjoyable as possible. Paul.
Thanks for such informative review. I have one question, is there any kind f loop or another thing for attaching hiking sticks and ice axe?
You're welcome. I'm afraid the Farpoint Trek doesn't have walking pole holders. You could pop them into the side mesh pockets and fasten to the pack with the side compression straps; you'd just have to make sure the poles had some protective tips on. Harry
Thank you for the review. Do you recommend this over the Osprey farpoint70? What are the differences? Can I attach Osprey 40 to it as a daily backpack!
The main difference is the Trek has a far more substantial backsystem, making it suitable for both travel and light trekking, whereas the standard Farpoint is more of a travel pack and not suitable for long distance walking. As far as I'm aware, there's no native way to attach the Farpoint 40, but you can attach a Daylight Travel. Regards, Harry.
@@trekitt thank you very much. I am about to order mine, how is the petrol blue color in person? Is it a nice blue or would you say black is nicer?
@@thaerwazani I'm a fan of the blue!
May I ask how tall is Paul here? I'm 178cm and thinking of buying the Fairview Trek 70. Most people tell me it's a huge pack but I'm a tall woman and if it looks like it does on Paul, I think it wouldn't look that huge on me.
6ft 3"/190cm. Definitely worth trying on. Worst case scenario you can always send it back. Harry
@@trekitt thank you for the reply. I might even go for the Farpoint Trek since the women's fit I tried with other Osprey models cut into my collarbones.
great vid! thanks!
Is better the 55 or 75 for a long travel? There is much difference of space? Thanks and nice video
Hi Mattia, the size of bag really depends on how much stuff you usually pack. Personally, I can get away with a small bag as I travel light, but my wife always takes a bigger bag as she likes to take more stuff. The difference between the two sizes is only 15 litres, about the size of a small daysack. The danger with a bigger bag is that you will be tempted to pack more and the bag will be heavier.
@@trekitt ok thanks for the answer.you think is better travel always with the hand luggage
thanks a lot for your video! I just bougth this bag a few days ago beacause i'm going on a trip for the next 6 month in south america and your video has confermed that it was a good choice. ^^
just a quick question, where do you think is the best place to attach the tent on this bag ? cheers from france
We'd always recommend storing the tent inside the bag nearest to your back as it'll be one of the heavier items in your pack. Kind regards, Harry.
An excellent review. Subscribed.
Hello guys, does the aircover/rain cover have zippers that can be locked?
It does indeed.
Hi there, thank you for the genuinely awesome and comprehensive review (best I've seen so far).
I'm planning a 7 night camping trip in a couple months but have no idea whether I should get the 75 or 55 version of the Farpoint Trek and was wondering which you would recommend?
Personally I would opt for the 55 as I know my tent, stove, sleeping bag and mat are all relatively light and will pack down fairly small. It largely depends on the pack size of the four items above and whether you'll also be carrying water or whether you're able to stop and fill up regularly. Kind regards, Harry.
@@trekitt Excellent! Thank you so much! Just to clarify, are you able to fit everything you mentioned inside the 55L pack itself or are you strapping, the tent for example, to the outside?
@@gegedah Everything would be inside.
Excelente explicacion.estoy convencido de comprar esta mochila.gracias
Just got one. Excellent bit of kit.
Hi, thanks for watching and thanks for your comments, we think it's a great bit of kit too. Paul.
Hi I'm 6ft 1 ,17 stone. Will these bag fit me?
I imagine it'll be fine. Generally we'd ask for your back length measurements and compare against the length of the pack, but Osprey don't seem to provide these details and we have none left in stock to measure. Paul is taller than you but has a comparatively short back length, so you won't be a million miles off.
@@trekitt thankyou for the reply
What colour is the bag in the Video ? Because it doesn t look like petrol blue
It is Petrol Blue, it just looks lighter as it was in direct sunlight. Kind regards, Harry.
Could FT 55 or even 75, be suitable for routes like Camino or some middle or light mountaineering? (Experience with Fairpoint 70 for Urban travelling )
For trail walking it'll be fine, but we wouldn't recommend it for mountaineering as it doesn't have a lot of essential features found in some of Osprey's more technical packs.
@@trekitt such as?
Would have been helpful to have also seen the smaller pack which attaches to this pack.
That's fair enough - good point.
Hi, would you recommend for Gold DofE?
Nope, I'd look at a true trekking pack for DofE. The Farpoint is a travel pack that also works for a bit of hiking, so it's not the best option for multi-day trekking trips. Take a look at the Osprey Kestrel - it comes in a bunch of different sizes and is currently 25% off on our website: www.trekitt.co.uk/facetresults.aspx?Term=Kestrel
Would the F/P 75 be a good choice for something like the Pennine Way ?
It'll definitely have enough space; possibly even too much depending on the size and weight of your tent, sleeping bag, sleeping mat and cook system. I'd recommend either ordering a few sizes and packing your kit into both to determine which is more suitable, or visit us for a wider range. Harry
@@trekittHi. Thanka for getting back. Tent is either my Zephyros 1 or my Helium 100 with footprint..sleeping bag is a megasleep 25/40 , mat is an exped megalite plus (outside strap on) with a lightweight inflateable not yet bought ,cook system is my Primus x lite with extra mug and plate. ( for P/W next year all this is) Trying to be weight coscious as i'm type 1 Diab. and taking the little dog so will have slightly more pack weight in food and medication..For that reason , i bought a E/hike trek 85 , as it was silly cheap at £30 quid and silly light at 1.3kg and if i just get the P/W out of it then ive had my moneys worth juat with that , but seeing the vid of the F/P 75 and the Rook 65 , i'm thinking get either and at only 30 £quid , keep the E/hike 85 as a good spare. The F/P 75 looks excellebt on the video but the 2.74 kg weight puts me off a bit ( This is what i mean about would be helpfull sayiing what the weights are when doing the videos) whereas the Rook 65 comes in at 1.7kg..which is still 400g more than my Trek 85 , but a lot more quality and features .Trying for a total of 12kg ish as a ballpark with 3-4 days of food , stocked up along the way (no frying stuff , to much extra weight unleas its a pub oe cafe ) So..(phew !) Would the Rook 65 be a better bet than the F/P 75 and would it be big enough ? No use asking Paul Messner he pulls his face if its under a Grand in price ! 😄
@@tomhamer7838 The Rook or Kestrel from Osprey will be a more suitable option for what you're doing. They're 'proper' trekking packs and not adapted from a travel pack, so they're lighter and arguably more comfortable when loaded up. Both the Kestrel 68 and Rook 65 will have enough space if packed correctly. The additional weight over your trek 85 will be largely down to the backsystem; something that you won't notice at all thanks to the additional comfort it'll offer. I used the Kestrel 68 for a three-day trek with tent, food, water, etc and it was more than large enough and far more comfortable than I expected, even after days of use. The Rook is just as comfortable (in my opinion) and will serve a similar purpose. Harry
Great video mate!
Cheers! Paul.
Awesome review as always
very nice review. one question: where to carry trek poles for this one? thanks
As far as we could tell, there weren't any specifically designed locations for trekking poles.
Thanks for answer. What is cimfortable weight region for this bag?
@@weitao9244 Osprey don't provide these details unfortunately, but as a guess we'd say anywhere between 10 - 25kg would be absolutely fine.
@@trekitt OK. Thanks a lot! is aircover zipper lockable? I am 170cm tall, does farpoint trek 75 fit fine ? or fairview 70 fit better?
@@weitao9244 The Aircover is lockable. Which model you go for depends mostly on your back length rather than your overall height, so we'd recommend either trying both on in person or ordering both and returning the one which doesn't fit.
Great video!
Do you know when this backpack is going to available to purchase?
Very shortly! We can't give an exact date as it's in the hands of Osprey, but we're expecting deliveries by the end of next week at the latest.
@@trekitt I actually found it on the osprey website already released.
ltcomment 6:29 1 pair of zipper for the whole bag , 9:25 cover covers the zippered area (no stealing)
Thanks for your comments.
does it have an Ice Axe loop?
Afraid not.
may I ask you how tall are you?
Hannah's 5ft 1". Harry
What's the color of the bag here ? is it the petrol blue one ?
Correct!
looks like I found my next pack.
Good choice! Thanks for watching.
Paul your rucksack reviews are the best. But 3 things: 1. what are the weights empty and full? 2. How does it look on you?(you're getting there with other vids) 3. I don't want to be reminded of my tummy so don't show me yours.
The Trek weighs 2.1kg when empty; unfortunately we didn't weigh the bag when Paul had it packed, but obviously it depends where/how far you're going and if you're going to be packing sleeping equipment. We'll make a note to do a few shots of Paul wearing the pack next time; we remembered for the Farpoint Wheels but not the Trek.... Doh!
Are the zipper lockable like the farpoint and Fairview for safety in hostel
@@lilachu7654 Unfortunately not. The Farpoint Wheels has lockable zips, but not the Trek.
@@lilachu7654 I purchased this pack in an official Osprey store in Malaysia, and mine does have a lockable zipper. However, only the main zipper for the top compartment is lockable. The zipper on the lower compartment is not lockable.
@@PlanetDoug that's the only real flaw of this bag apparently
what about putting your computer?
There isn't a dedicated laptop sleeve, but as long as your laptop is in a case it'll fit in the front zipped pocket (15" or smaller).