More on Nash equilibrium | Game theory and Nash equilibrium | Microeconomics | Khan Academy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 січ 2012
  • Looking more closely at the definition of Nash Equilibrium
    Watch the next lesson: www.khanacademy.org/economics...
    Missed the previous lesson? www.khanacademy.org/economics...
    Microeconomics on Khan Academy: Topics covered in a traditional college level introductory microeconomics course
    About Khan Academy: Khan Academy offers practice exercises, instructional videos, and a personalized learning dashboard that empower learners to study at their own pace in and outside of the classroom. We tackle math, science, computer programming, history, art history, economics, and more. Our math missions guide learners from kindergarten to calculus using state-of-the-art, adaptive technology that identifies strengths and learning gaps. We've also partnered with institutions like NASA, The Museum of Modern Art, The California Academy of Sciences, and MIT to offer specialized content.
    For free. For everyone. Forever. #YouCanLearnAnything
    Subscribe to Khan Academy's Microeconomics channel: / channel
    Subscribe to Khan Academy: ua-cam.com/users/subscription_...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 50

  • @realloc24
    @realloc24 10 років тому +82

    The best explanation i have ever heard about the the Nash Equilibrium, Thank you.

  • @monyreaseyoung5955
    @monyreaseyoung5955 6 років тому +16

    yayyy I understood just now! the yale video didn't help but you always did. Thanks Salman for always helping me from high school to college!

  • @roseyhuang5096
    @roseyhuang5096 4 роки тому +2

    the best explanation on this topic! thank you

  • @jasonshi8315
    @jasonshi8315 10 років тому +1

    Thank you so much for making this video!

  • @aravbehl5166
    @aravbehl5166 11 місяців тому +1

    solved the question and this really helps to find the Nash Eqbm quickly!

  • @sanjeevshukla2826
    @sanjeevshukla2826 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you so much, sir! Huge Respect!

  • @shiza223
    @shiza223 12 років тому +4

    Khan you are a real hero!

  • @vishnusreddy
    @vishnusreddy 4 роки тому +2

    Very well explained, thank you.

  • @lyudong9276
    @lyudong9276 Рік тому +2

    I always can understand confusing concepts after watching Khan's video.

  • @dogeeternally9683
    @dogeeternally9683 2 роки тому

    love to hear someone else explain this

  • @sarrae100
    @sarrae100 Рік тому

    Amazing Sal as always!!

  • @stamaxo
    @stamaxo 12 років тому +1

    Thanks, can you do more videos, really interesting stuff.

  • @thomasbates9189
    @thomasbates9189 2 роки тому

    Great video! Thanks

  • @nornasution
    @nornasution 3 роки тому

    Thanks for the great explanation

  • @wardamalik9341
    @wardamalik9341 5 років тому

    Thanks for best explanation

  • @samdeen95
    @samdeen95 5 років тому

    THANK YOU~!

  • @LanRous
    @LanRous 12 років тому +1

    Sal what is the next subject you are about to deal with after these?
    And when you are gonna start the new subject?

  • @Yano5151
    @Yano5151 6 років тому +2

    I get it now

  • @valbrazilval
    @valbrazilval 12 років тому +1

    I feel the Nash Equilibrium...Ninguém é tão importante assim...Somos iguais!

  • @jamesjosephclarke
    @jamesjosephclarke 12 років тому +3

    @ElectroMagneticWeak Well, he did say that it has to do with the movie, "A Beautiful Mind".

  • @catching45
    @catching45 12 років тому

    More Nash Equilibrium, Please.

  • @TheBackyardBeaver
    @TheBackyardBeaver 12 років тому

    Yes KA has game theory!

  • @catouncormery2995
    @catouncormery2995 5 років тому

    thank u

  • @vladsafronov7642
    @vladsafronov7642 5 років тому +2

    I wonder how would it be applied to the game of chicken.
    There won't be an undebatable Nash equilibrium since if both of them drive "straight" (similar to prisoner's dilemma's "confess"), they crash-which is an infinite loss for both of them.

  • @AnthonyVoutas
    @AnthonyVoutas 12 років тому +3

    @khanacademy Are there any interesting games with multiple Nash Equilibriums?

  • @ElectroMagneticWeak
    @ElectroMagneticWeak 12 років тому +3

    Reminds me of A Beautiful Mind...

  • @vladimirmisin1876
    @vladimirmisin1876 7 років тому +5

    Why is a state of non cooperation called Nash Equilibrium, when Nash was all about cooperation ? Please

  • @nitishkumarjurel241
    @nitishkumarjurel241 2 місяці тому

    What do you mean by a "stable state'? What would be a stable state vs an unstable state in this scenario?

  • @fjgozell
    @fjgozell 5 років тому

    What is he using to do the video? :D

  • @lindad8661
    @lindad8661 6 років тому +1

    How does Sal know so much about so many topics HOW

  • @amesea
    @amesea 9 років тому

    guys, watch nice guys last irst by richard dawkins.

  • @moxy82
    @moxy82 9 років тому +5

    While I understand the concept and can definitely appreciate the sociological stability of case 4, it's still sad that integrity is so quickly sacrificed and we're debating someone lying to reduce jail time... but then I guess we are talking about hypothetical, convicted drug dealers...

  • @mookosh
    @mookosh 12 років тому

    neat o.o

  • @effortless35
    @effortless35 12 років тому

    @voutasaurus Google Stag Hunt or Dating Game + Game Theory.

  • @infinitedonuts
    @infinitedonuts Рік тому +1

    Is there always a nash equilibrium? I wouldn’t think so.

  • @Ratchetreviews
    @Ratchetreviews 12 років тому

    Nash is my name!

  • @Djc99120
    @Djc99120 5 років тому +2

    🤗🤗👨‍🏫👍👍

  • @laurenaggie
    @laurenaggie 9 місяців тому

    yet another khan academy dub

  • @somberlight
    @somberlight 12 років тому

    @ElectroMagneticWeak as it should. the movie IS about the same guy.

  • @trotskyeraumpicareta4178
    @trotskyeraumpicareta4178 7 років тому +12

    "BUT WAIT! This is just a theory! The GAME THEORY! thanks for watching."

  • @Schindlabua
    @Schindlabua 12 років тому

    @voutasaurus If you're into that stuff, check out JimBobJenkins. He devoted his entire channel to explaining game theory.

  • @ilmniezozlang397
    @ilmniezozlang397 3 роки тому

    Assalomu aleykum

  • @tribudeuno
    @tribudeuno 6 років тому

    So why is it that the law enforcement officials are not considered participants in the game - and it is indeed their game, their attempt to control - in that they can receive a conviction if even one confesses or rule out culpability if none confesses?
    And a Taoist would not see the game in terms of gain being gain and loss being loss...
    "When you gain, you lose. When you lose, you gain"...
    "Bad fortune is what good fortune leans on. Good fortune is what bad fortune hides in"...
    Tao Te Ching
    If one of the people confesses, and so receives the short sentence, he may be stabbed to death by the other when he gets out after 10 years for telling authorities, so his gain turns to loss. That loss would not take place if he intentionally takes the risk of loss upfront by not confessing. So that loss would turn to gain in that there would be no reason for reprisals...

    • @ashishjha7361
      @ashishjha7361 2 роки тому

      In that you forget the basic nature of humans, that they always put self preservation first before any honor code.

  • @dravidr007
    @dravidr007 12 років тому

    kai bath hai!?

  • @lilperv
    @lilperv 11 років тому +2

    this is not nuanced enough. Need to say that for the nonstable state, if they can play the game again, they will eventually get to the Nash eq. That's pretty important to mention

    • @nirajrajai3116
      @nirajrajai3116 4 роки тому

      Given the expected reward(individually) isn't their goal state nash eq state only. Why would they need multiple iterations of game?

  • @valbrazilval
    @valbrazilval 12 років тому

    @123MrBee what do you think of my comment?

  • @genesisdotre
    @genesisdotre 7 років тому

    4:20 why not just say 2) and 3) symmetrical? (no need to explain any further)

  • @zes7215
    @zes7215 5 років тому

    not important, useless