It rarely is this way. Innovation usually is the result of multiple persoms working and sharing on a direction for a long time with little baby steps. There are multiple "eureka" moments and lots of hard work. Regards
@@HowToAiNow So true !! but the little eureka moments feel so good !! Personally I feel I am the smartest man when I crack a hard one and everyone is like - "Why didn't I think of this"
@@HowToAiNow There are multiple different theories on how innovation works. Best as I can determine from practical experience, the team, a good team, can provide a fertile environment for insight to form - either by presenting different ways to look at a problem, or just by tearing down bad ideas. However 95% of the time the key insight comes from one mind over about 10 seconds (though it then takes 6 months to subsequently nail it all down). Rarely, it seems, does a ground breaking idea stem from two or more simultaneously. Indeed when the inspiration hits the individual usually needs stop engaging from the group whilst they explore the insight. If they then explain it, others can 'get it' and might feel that they were part of the inspiration - but the key insights seem to be personal, and necessary for progress.
I love watching these clips, I get so pumped to go to school on Monday and create some mind-blowing breakthrough to wow my professors and to cement myself in history books forever. Except my professor says "Steve, this is a drawing of a stick figure with the words 'Steve's theory of stick figures' written under it. And this isn't a school, it's a factory, and i'm not a professor i'm your boss and you're 15 minutes late and your fired."
I am currently writing my senior thesis in history. Even as a small child, this film encouraged me to dream academically. I am on the last chapter and am now watching this scene again. The diligence portrayed in this movie still motivates me as if I were still a little boy taking my first steps on this path.
@@EseEtiebet-rk8vm I am studying in Germany and the thesis has dealt with historical immigration after World War II and the economic boom of the 1950s in Germany. I put a focus on the relationship between the city and migration. This is because migration processes in the 50s, 60s and 70s were judged in an extremely racist and xenophobic way in the German majority society. This also had an impact on historical research and imposed blinkers on it. In more recent research, however, one suspects that migration was treated differently at the local level than in the nation-state framework. I have investigated this myself in my work, using a concrete example, and have come to some interesting conclusions. But I am glad that the work process is over now. I think motivation and discipline are both very important to stick with it. I am motivated by many things and people. Often it is certain songs, quotes, books, personalities that motivate me in the lowest moments. Just like this movie scene.
Takes a theory, applies it through competency and ownership of it, then runs with it by revising it into an unknown, evolved and "Equilibrium" state of a better theory. Truly a beautiful mind
@@T_U_Fbefore Nash, people believed Adam Smith's idea that competition leads to the best results; sort of like saying "let's race and may the best man win." To oversimplify, Nash's game theory states that if you only do what is in your selfish interest, you will create a situation in which both you and your competitors lose! Since most people's eyes glaze over when you show them graphs and statistics, this everyday example of asking girls out in a bar shows it better.
@@austinlongoria7901 Right, in a Nash equilibrium, everyone is playing their best strategy related to everyone else's best strategy and thus no incentive to change their strategy, unlike in this movie example.
Although in this situation, the Nash Equilibrium, is somewhat similar to the Prisoner's Dilemma. Yet, here if all the guys choose the blonde, as Nash noted, not one of the guys gets laid, no one wins.
@Soraplushie If no one wants to change their position to better themselves then it is a Nash Equalibrium. Isnt it. No one wants to go for the blond because they know that if they do they wont get laid. They go for her friends knowing that it will get them laid. They DONT want to change their position.
@Soraplushie The preference doesnt matter. Does it. What matters is their decisions to not go for the blonde because they know that it will get them laid. They are willing to not change their decision to not go for the blonde.
@Trites - Except you don't understand what their actual preferences are and trying to dictate or control it with government policy is a complete failure, so you're better off not trying that label. The complexity of the "human robot" is beyond your human intellect.
In my opinion one of the best films ever made . The depictment of schizophrenia was spot on. Have lived with my mother suffering the same illness for 40 years and the sensitive script and unsurpassed acting is nothing short of genius. I hope this film gives people incite into mental illness
Like others have said here, this scene motivates for some reason. The music really stimulates that Eureka-feeling. Nash can't wait to work his theory out and talking softly to himself in mathematical language. Epic
The most mind blowing thing about the Nash Equilibrium to me, is the simple mathematical model that underpins it. The N.E. is the intersection between the Best-Response curves of every agent. *mindblown*
This isn't a Nash equilibrium tho. A Nash equilibrium would be a case where no agent (the guys in this scene) wishes to change their strategies (pursue any other girl in this case), given the strategy of the other agents. In this case, any guy can go pursue the blond woman (change strategy) given the others have already chosen a strategy (dancing with one of the other girls).
@@neelanshguptaa310 no you can't because 'nobody likes to be second choice' including the blond. This is a Nash equilibrium. Switching to blond last minute when you see the others go for brunettes is a losing strat
The theory at the time was that businesses work best when we all compete against each other because competition brings about the best economic results. This is what capitalism is about - the market forces determining the outcomes through competition. But Nash realises that there are situations where we need to work collectively in order for everyone to win.
I READ Adam Smith's 'Wealth of Nations". This is not what he says; and he excoriates businesses that are raping the nation and its citizens. Capitalism is not based on Smith's work. His work is misused as a shield for feral greed.
Exactly. We hang together or we hang separately. Team players. What benefits one, benefits all. That is why I am left scratching my head on why this is viewed as a revolutionary breakthrough in economics. Its been known forever.
John Nash's revision is how every community should work. What's best for yourself and the community. If everyone in the community only operates for self , the community fails.
But if ignoring others is bad for the self, you should recognize that considering others is good for the self, therefore the best thing for everyone is to be for themselves. The problem is a misunderstanding of what living for yourself means. Self-centredness isn't selfish.
@@thememaster7 Being self-centered is always great but the only way you build an organized, prosperous community is for everyone in the community to contribute to it. The proof is literally everywhere. All the messed up places in the world or even with a state or city, are places where people dont work together to make the place better
Nash was brilliant: after his friends took his advice and ignored the blonde girl, he puts his arm around her and proceeds to exit the bar, shouting, "So long, suckers!!"
a nash equilibrium is when given that no one changes there choices noone can do strictly better by changing their choices the most likely nash equilibrium in that situation would be whoever approaches the blonde first gets to try but afterwards given that they would block eachother it would be irrational for anyone else to approach her later and they should move on to another girl. No aggreement is required for an optimum outcome the nash equilibrium is the optimum outcome assuming all players are rational.
Matthew Balch Wrong. The Nash equilibrium is not necessarily the pareto optimal outcome (see the prisoners dilemma). That is the observation that contradicts Adam Smith's neoclassical position that self-interested actors achieve the best possible outcome. In this scene Nash is observing that the strategic equilibrium outcome (that everyone approaches the blonde) makes everyone worse-off compared to if all individuals coordinated not to go for the blonde. The notion that in certain situations the self-interested equilibrium is less preferable to the coordinated outcome contradicts neoclassical economic dogma.
aroyal641 But in this case, any of them has an incentive to defect, which contradicts the Nash Equilibrium Theory. (considering that getting the blonde worths 10 and getting the brunettes worths 5)
In this scenario one of the rules is the brunettes would reject a player that had chosen the blonde first... so wouldn't it be implied that it works both ways and that once a player has chosen a brunette, the blonde would reject them if they then go for her? In that case none of the players have incentive to deviate from the brunettes.
Nature is not without irony. Geniuses like these are less likely to get married or have children. But they live for eternity through their thoughts while rest of us live through our genes.
@@ritam8767 Na man we both got recommended the same video about the same time so was curious as to what you were watching just before this because we both landed up here. hahahahah
I love how they say 'If this is some way for you to get the blonde, you can go to hell.' If they believed him, he would'dve actually went for the blonde after all. Sneaky man
If this is all true and he did really run up to the blond woman say thank you and run off again then this has got to be one of the most priceless moment's in academic history.
This is so true. I work in the commerce. And I realized when we do only what is good for us without consider our rival companies we can't survive, we must have a good relationship with them 'cause' everyone needs everyone when our stock runs out and we need to refer someone to cover our temporary lack!
The director of the movie nailed it....its so difficult to portray n place before audience the story n how Nash equilibrium came into being... the Director as well as music director ..truely ..a beautiful mind..
@@ricsouza5011 Right, in a Nash equilibrium, everyone is playing their best strategy related to everyone else's best strategy and thus no incentive to change their strategy, unlike in this movie example. In the movie, each guy still has an incentive to deviate.
I adore the ending of this scene. While the review of his work wouldn't be so brief (I'd think they'd take weeks or even months to scrutinize and peer review it), what a feeling that must be to have your work so acknowledged in the height of worldwide academia. Hell, he's far ABOVE those who reviewed it. It's no wonder these guys are so often claimed arrogant and condescending. They could afford to be. Ah, I could only ever dream of being so intelligent...perhaps in my next life.
You'd almost certainly trade in valuable people's skills for that intelligence, and let's not forget a human life isn't all about doing what you're best at. Sometimes we just wanna chill and have fun, with other people.
Kale P That decision could lead to a level of loneliness to potentially create mental ilnesses (if it even were possible). My evidence is the amount of times geniuses have told us how much they wish they could be ordinary/mediocre, because the knowledge they acquire with their intelligence cannot be discarded anymore, especially not on purpose. However I agree with you on your first statement, this scene is one of the most enjoyable in the entire movie.
The last scene was not true. In reality the professors were not really impressed with the work and almost 20 years later the Nash-Equilibrium got the attention!
@@trevorochmonek9024 This is because scientists dont really sit around a camp fire and sing, as the right wing groups would suggest all scientists are lefty's. In reality peer review can be a "battle royale" as if your going to agree to some young up start with a new paper trashing the last 40 years of your work!!!
The greatest "shot" is when Nash lines his p.o.v. with the reflections, refractions, and shadows of a lemonade bowl (😉) and a hideous tie! Absolutely Adored this Art!
I ran into Adam Goldberg circa 1998 directly across the street from the Lee Strasberg theater and film institute on e15 st - he was in front of me getting coffe at a restaurant directly accross the street . He turned around and nervously sighted me in my construction workers clothes -and mumbled something as he moved pass me - he was great in Brighton Beach memoirs .
After just writing my final exam on game theory it’s ironic this would pop up in my recommended. If it’s wasn’t for this man I might not needed to study hundreds of hours of this stuff. Crazy to think about
I don't know if this is intentional, I'm confident it is, but I love the fact that the bar music that plays in the background ends just as Nash finishes his point. 2:12
how have I never seen this scene isolated before??? took economics first year uni, and knew about this film beforehand, then watched this film after learning about the Nash Equilibrium to see if I would get it...did not, half because economics killed me and half because I was too caught up in the story to pay any real attention to this scene...fast forward 2 years after, and my mind is getting friggen BLOWN...accuracy in portrayal aside, accuracy to the ACTUAL EQUILIBRIUM aside (there's some watering down, twisting, making fit to the scene, and in any case it's meant to be the spark of the idea not the actual, fully fleshed out theory after however long it was that it took to realise)...still an incredible, history-making breakthrough...
One of the main milestones within the leading path of the Theory of games: firstly-Cournot and his approaches on duopoly; secondly- Von Neumann, who settled down the framework for the analysis ( its fundamentals) thirdly - John Nass, whose insights gave proper form to the likelihood of one perfect equilibrium where after one "contract" the solution chosen would be the worst one, and then a bunch of names from which Joseph Stiglitz could be highlited for widening the framework to insurances and oportunistic behavior. Finally, the theory of games become one of the main tools of an spectrum of models and theories systemized whose name is the Theory of information.
It does illustrate though that adam Smith was wrong. That the maximum group utility is not achieved by each person acting in their best said interests..., that only gets you to the Nash equilibrium.
they could've all went after her and enjoyed her at the same time LOL, and then it comes down to who goes last and you face the law of diminishing returns.
Good ole nash adding an extra chapter to my intermediate microeconomics course...
feel ya bro, feel ya
Don’t worry brother, you’ll soon witness another chapter added by me in the future. I’m pursuing economics and mathematics. So,watch out brother
@@AC-ob3by If this is your plan to get the blonde, then you can go to hell, Hitler
@@DivineAtheistWannabe Underrated comment
wait till ya get to intermediary macro, makes micro look like a fucking walk in the park
This is the greatest thing about research and innovation. For a moment, you know something no one on earth does.
It rarely is this way. Innovation usually is the result of multiple persoms working and sharing on a direction for a long time with little baby steps.
There are multiple "eureka" moments and lots of hard work.
Regards
@@HowToAiNow So true !! but the little eureka moments feel so good !! Personally I feel I am the smartest man when I crack a hard one and everyone is like - "Why didn't I think of this"
i have this sensation often.
far more often than anyone else i imagine.
@@sharpnova2 Frisson???
@@HowToAiNow There are multiple different theories on how innovation works. Best as I can determine from practical experience, the team, a good team, can provide a fertile environment for insight to form - either by presenting different ways to look at a problem, or just by tearing down bad ideas. However 95% of the time the key insight comes from one mind over about 10 seconds (though it then takes 6 months to subsequently nail it all down). Rarely, it seems, does a ground breaking idea stem from two or more simultaneously. Indeed when the inspiration hits the individual usually needs stop engaging from the group whilst they explore the insight. If they then explain it, others can 'get it' and might feel that they were part of the inspiration - but the key insights seem to be personal, and necessary for progress.
The way he explains gives deep chills, it conveys perfectly what it feels like to be hit by an original idea.
Exactly
A feeling that is totally unfamiliar to me as yet.
@@3dbadboy1 Ah, as you said as yet. You will get there. These breakthroughs don’t happen many times in a lifetime.
you fellas having those all the time are ya
I love watching these clips, I get so pumped to go to school on Monday and create some mind-blowing breakthrough to wow my professors and to cement myself in history books forever. Except my professor says "Steve, this is a drawing of a stick figure with the words 'Steve's theory of stick figures' written under it. And this isn't a school, it's a factory, and i'm not a professor i'm your boss and you're 15 minutes late and your fired."
It's never late mate. Just go out there and do it.
ahahahahahahaaaa
it is my dream too. we'll make it come true. it's not late
IQ is hereditary qq
That was so funny it was sad
I am currently writing my senior thesis in history. Even as a small child, this film encouraged me to dream academically. I am on the last chapter and am now watching this scene again. The diligence portrayed in this movie still motivates me as if I were still a little boy taking my first steps on this path.
@@EseEtiebet-rk8vm I am studying in Germany and the thesis has dealt with historical immigration after World War II and the economic boom of the 1950s in Germany. I put a focus on the relationship between the city and migration. This is because migration processes in the 50s, 60s and 70s were judged in an extremely racist and xenophobic way in the German majority society. This also had an impact on historical research and imposed blinkers on it. In more recent research, however, one suspects that migration was treated differently at the local level than in the nation-state framework. I have investigated this myself in my work, using a concrete example, and have come to some interesting conclusions.
But I am glad that the work process is over now. I think motivation and discipline are both very important to stick with it. I am motivated by many things and people. Often it is certain songs, quotes, books, personalities that motivate me in the lowest moments. Just like this movie scene.
Rest In Peace, John Nash :-(
Zurassh Unbelieveable the way he and his wife died, completely unfitting for a person like him.
Ascenec James It's tragic. Though, it makes you wonder, why weren't they wearing seat belts?
Zurassh you think it might have been suicide ?
yvan1401 No. It was a tragic accident. If they wanted to commit suicide, why take a taxi cab?
when the hell did this happen?!
Takes a theory, applies it through competency and ownership of it, then runs with it by revising it into an unknown, evolved and "Equilibrium" state of a better theory. Truly a beautiful mind
This has got to be one of the most epic scenes that explains game theory in its simplest form.
Could u explain this
@@T_U_Fbefore Nash, people believed Adam Smith's idea that competition leads to the best results; sort of like saying "let's race and may the best man win." To oversimplify, Nash's game theory states that if you only do what is in your selfish interest, you will create a situation in which both you and your competitors lose! Since most people's eyes glaze over when you show them graphs and statistics, this everyday example of asking girls out in a bar shows it better.
Even though it’s poorly explained in this movie. All the guys have an incentive to deviate in this example.
@@austinlongoria7901 Right, in a Nash equilibrium, everyone is playing their best strategy related to everyone else's best strategy and thus no incentive to change their strategy, unlike in this movie example.
Although in this situation, the Nash Equilibrium, is somewhat similar to the Prisoner's Dilemma. Yet, here if all the guys choose the blonde, as Nash noted, not one of the guys gets laid, no one wins.
John Nash. A man with a mission, a drive, and a purpose. Respect well deserved.
The piano in the score ❤️ such a beautiful music by james horner
This is such an amazing scene.
I’m in my senior year of studying economics, and Nash Equilibrium has been in every textbook I’ve had to buy.
"buy"????
@@studybooks3395 yes? How else would I get them?
@@gabe2349 are you fucking kidding me, right?
@@studybooks3395 I mean, I suppose I could rent them but I prefer to buy them
If a book is worth reading, it’s worth owning.
it's not just economy, he is mathematician, he just provides tools for everyone to apply... even evolutionary biology or game theory
other than not being a nash equilibrium, this is a great scene
What is it?
@Soraplushie If no one wants to change their position to better themselves then it is a Nash Equalibrium. Isnt it. No one wants to go for the blond because they know that if they do they wont get laid. They go for her friends knowing that it will get them laid. They DONT want to change their position.
@Soraplushie The preference doesnt matter. Does it. What matters is their decisions to not go for the blonde because they know that it will get them laid. They are willing to not change their decision to not go for the blonde.
@Soraplushie
Simply put. People are robotic preferences.
@Trites - Except you don't understand what their actual preferences are and trying to dictate or control it with government policy is a complete failure, so you're better off not trying that label. The complexity of the "human robot" is beyond your human intellect.
In my opinion one of the best films ever made . The depictment of schizophrenia was spot on. Have lived with my mother suffering the same illness for 40 years and the sensitive script and unsurpassed acting is nothing short of genius. I hope this film gives people incite into mental illness
Nash had only auditory hallucinations, he didn't see an imaginary friend.
Erm no one said he did, you realise that still schizophrenia lool
Insight vs incite. 😂
@@LuisFernando-yd3mx 😂😂😂 sorry luis a slip of the brain cells. But it incited you into a reply 🤪
Like others have said here, this scene motivates for some reason. The music really stimulates that Eureka-feeling. Nash can't wait to work his theory out and talking softly to himself in mathematical language. Epic
yeah but thats not a scene about nash equilibrium, its pareto.
john nash: the inventor of wingmaning
This particular clip watched right before my exam awarded me 15 marks !
I love this scene a lot.. Especially bg by James horner completely tooks me to other world lv u JH we gona miss ur music...
The most mind blowing thing about the Nash Equilibrium to me, is the simple mathematical model that underpins it. The N.E. is the intersection between the Best-Response curves of every agent. *mindblown*
This scene was the best theoretical illustration of the Nash equilibrium I have seen.
Much better understood then my university courses..😂
The only problem is is that it isn't a Nash equilibrium.
This isn't a Nash equilibrium tho. A Nash equilibrium would be a case where no agent (the guys in this scene) wishes to change their strategies (pursue any other girl in this case), given the strategy of the other agents. In this case, any guy can go pursue the blond woman (change strategy) given the others have already chosen a strategy (dancing with one of the other girls).
@@neelanshguptaa310 no you can't because 'nobody likes to be second choice' including the blond. This is a Nash equilibrium. Switching to blond last minute when you see the others go for brunettes is a losing strat
The theory at the time was that businesses work best when we all compete against each other because competition brings about the best economic results. This is what capitalism is about - the market forces determining the outcomes through competition. But Nash realises that there are situations where we need to work collectively in order for everyone to win.
I READ Adam Smith's 'Wealth of Nations".
This is not what he says; and he excoriates businesses that are raping the nation and its citizens.
Capitalism is not based on Smith's work. His work is misused as a shield for feral greed.
@@veramae4098 this. He is used as a poster child for negligent capitalistic practices.
There’s a lot more to this discovery than the movie shows. If it were that simple, he wouldn’t have gotten a Nobel award.
@@smellypatel5272 What a snowflake! And a stinky Punjabber to boot...
for example?
the simplicity of complexity. Genius.
Thinking of a original idea is the greatest feeling ever, no matter how stupid or ill relevant it is it’s still the greatest high
Perfect explanation for united we stand. Divided we fall.
Exactly. We hang together or we hang separately. Team players. What benefits one, benefits all.
That is why I am left scratching my head on why this is viewed as a revolutionary breakthrough in economics. Its been known forever.
This was a great film. Both Russell Crowe and Jennifer Connelly's performances were excellent.
Paul Bettany was the better option if you ask me
One of my most favorite movies and favorite scenes of it
one of my favorite movies ever
One of the greatest scenes ever
Just spent the last week studying this at school👏🙌
John Nash's revision is how every community should work. What's best for yourself and the community. If everyone in the community only operates for self , the community fails.
Sensible. 🤔
But if ignoring others is bad for the self, you should recognize that considering others is good for the self, therefore the best thing for everyone is to be for themselves. The problem is a misunderstanding of what living for yourself means. Self-centredness isn't selfish.
That's what it's like when you're a republican.
@@modelleg thats a complement to republicans , lol
@@thememaster7 Being self-centered is always great but the only way you build an organized, prosperous community is for everyone in the community to contribute to it. The proof is literally everywhere. All the messed up places in the world or even with a state or city, are places where people dont work together to make the place better
One of the best scenes in the history of cinema. Acting, script, photography, sfx, editing - everything superlative
Nash was brilliant: after his friends took his advice and ignored the blonde girl, he puts his arm around her and proceeds to exit the bar, shouting, "So long, suckers!!"
ua-cam.com/video/sVzvRsl4rEM/v-deo.html
@@SNKE ?
but that didnt happen so wtf are you talking about?
@@zada4a it's humour.
PMSL!! Well done!
this situation although interesting actually isn't a nash equilibrium.
explain why, I don't agree.
a nash equilibrium is when given that no one changes there choices noone can do strictly better by changing their choices the most likely nash equilibrium in that situation would be whoever approaches the blonde first gets to try but afterwards given that they would block eachother it would be irrational for anyone else to approach her later and they should move on to another girl. No aggreement is required for an optimum outcome the nash equilibrium is the optimum outcome assuming all players are rational.
Matthew Balch Wrong. The Nash equilibrium is not necessarily the pareto optimal outcome (see the prisoners dilemma). That is the observation that contradicts Adam Smith's neoclassical position that self-interested actors achieve the best possible outcome. In this scene Nash is observing that the strategic equilibrium outcome (that everyone approaches the blonde) makes everyone worse-off compared to if all individuals coordinated not to go for the blonde. The notion that in certain situations the self-interested equilibrium is less preferable to the coordinated outcome contradicts neoclassical economic dogma.
aroyal641 But in this case, any of them has an incentive to defect, which contradicts the Nash Equilibrium Theory. (considering that getting the blonde worths 10 and getting the brunettes worths 5)
In this scenario one of the rules is the brunettes would reject a player that had chosen the blonde first... so wouldn't it be implied that it works both ways and that once a player has chosen a brunette, the blonde would reject them if they then go for her? In that case none of the players have incentive to deviate from the brunettes.
Nature is not without irony. Geniuses like these are less likely to get married or have children. But they live for eternity through their thoughts while rest of us live through our genes.
... or 'jeans' for that matter.
Lmao, John Nash had a wife and 2 kids. That's 2 more than you.
@@ritam8767 Hey observer , we got recommended the same video at the same time. Cheers !!!
@@nerdyguy7270 have we met before here? I'm sorry, can't seem to remember.
@@ritam8767 Na man we both got recommended the same video about the same time so was curious as to what you were watching just before this because we both landed up here. hahahahah
One of my all-time favorite movies.
Alternative title: Nerd creates complex rationalization for his fear to approach a woman
Never thought in my wildest dream, Economics can be so much FUN!
This is a beautiful depiction of schizophrenia.
Nah that’s called imagination.... granted he did have it. This is just imagination I think schizo is a lot weirder than that lol.
lol
lol
True.
@@michaelw234 While you are right it's weird, this is just a single scene of the whole film. There are a lot of weird things happening later on.
I get goosebumps whenever I watch this scene. A beautiful mind at work!
I love how they say 'If this is some way for you to get the blonde, you can go to hell.'
If they believed him, he would'dve actually went for the blonde after all. Sneaky man
The best film and the best scene ever!
If this is all true and he did really run up to the blond woman say thank you and run off again then this has got to be one of the most priceless moment's in academic history.
Hi.. & Thank You.. ☺I love this film. GREAT !! ❤💋
This is so true. I work in the commerce. And I realized when we do only what is good for us without consider our rival companies we can't survive, we must have a good relationship with them 'cause' everyone needs everyone when our stock runs out and we need to refer someone to cover our temporary lack!
James Horner's glorious music!
The director of the movie nailed it....its so difficult to portray n place before audience the story n how Nash equilibrium came into being... the Director as well as music director ..truely ..a beautiful mind..
Yep, can even order a book on it if you’re interested. It’s an interesting subject to read along with chaos theory for math majors.
thats not nash equilibrium though.
@@ricsouza5011 Right, in a Nash equilibrium, everyone is playing their best strategy related to everyone else's best strategy and thus no incentive to change their strategy, unlike in this movie example. In the movie, each guy still has an incentive to deviate.
The only problem is is that it isn't a Nash equilibrium.
Awesome movie...
I learned alot from it.
That movie was great!
I think his story of triumph over his schizophrenia is the most inspiring aspect of his achievements...........
2:40 she hadn't realized that she just revolutionized the theory of economics
I was a neuroscience pre-med and supply chain minor in undergrad, and my maco-Econ class was still the hardest class I've ever had to take.
Just incredible!!!
I adore the ending of this scene. While the review of his work wouldn't be so brief (I'd think they'd take weeks or even months to scrutinize and peer review it), what a feeling that must be to have your work so acknowledged in the height of worldwide academia. Hell, he's far ABOVE those who reviewed it.
It's no wonder these guys are so often claimed arrogant and condescending. They could afford to be. Ah, I could only ever dream of being so intelligent...perhaps in my next life.
You'd almost certainly trade in valuable people's skills for that intelligence, and let's not forget a human life isn't all about doing what you're best at. Sometimes we just wanna chill and have fun, with other people.
BusaLova I believe I'd trade in nearly anything for that degree of intelligence.
Kale P That decision could lead to a level of loneliness to potentially create mental ilnesses (if it even were possible). My evidence is the amount of times geniuses have told us how much they wish they could be ordinary/mediocre, because the knowledge they acquire with their intelligence cannot be discarded anymore, especially not on purpose.
However I agree with you on your first statement, this scene is one of the most enjoyable in the entire movie.
The last scene was not true. In reality the professors were not really impressed with the work and almost 20 years later the Nash-Equilibrium got the attention!
@@trevorochmonek9024 This is because scientists dont really sit around a camp fire and sing, as the right wing groups would suggest all scientists are lefty's. In reality peer review can be a "battle royale" as if your going to agree to some young up start with a new paper trashing the last 40 years of your work!!!
How did he not win an Oscar for this??
14yrs ago??? Good God, UA-cam was in its infancy
puuure genius...love dis film...its a bit sad when he gets sick but it really makes you think hard about everything
He should have an Oscar for this.
"you'd be surpsired to know how many MIT chicks are smokin' hot,"
Yes, I would be surprised by that.
The greatest "shot" is when Nash lines his p.o.v. with the reflections, refractions, and shadows of a lemonade bowl (😉) and a hideous tie!
Absolutely Adored this Art!
I always dreamt of a similar breakthrough...I even joined as a janitor at the local patent office...as they say..progress begins with a single step 😬
Which country brother
We need more geniuses like Adam Smith, Adam Carolla, Joe Rogen and John Nash .
And me
Thank you, professor Nash.
🤓
You can thank this Man for your cable bills being so high, they don't compete so they don't get in each others way.
Looks like im gonna have to watch this masterpiece again.
This is actually Divine. Reality works that way since the many are really the One.
2:15 Me when I figure out basic supply and demand
Supply and demand; I came up with that! Turns out it already existed, but I arrived at it independently
I ran into Adam Goldberg circa 1998 directly across the street from the Lee Strasberg theater and film institute on e15 st - he was in front of me getting coffe at a restaurant directly accross the street . He turned around and nervously sighted me in my construction workers clothes -and mumbled something as he moved pass me - he was great in Brighton Beach memoirs .
Best scene in entire movie...the rigor working throughout night ..till morning breaks ....geniously portrayed by the Director n the music Director
After just writing my final exam on game theory it’s ironic this would pop up in my recommended. If it’s wasn’t for this man I might not needed to study hundreds of hours of this stuff. Crazy to think about
Lol, I am taking Game Theory right now and this popped up in my recommended. I was like wtheck? LOL
This is what goes through my head when I am at a bar staring into the abyss
Good ole Nash always solving puzzles and cracking codes. What a G!
Almost forgot to watch this scene this week
My man. I'm still a legend at math conferences.
I have 3 exams I have to cram for, all involve math. Now I'm gonna wind down by watching a clip about even more math
Putting a maths problem on screen for all moviegoers to understand deserves an applause to the Director.
An yet Afew of us sees u lost that warm chicks in such a snowy night!
R.I.P our great and only J. Nash!
That was probably the best scene in the movie.
I put this scene on replay on my DVD player. 📀😊❤️
Favorite scene, ..wish they’d start teaching this in combinatorics class 🤓
I love love love this movie ❤️
I don't know if this is intentional, I'm confident it is, but I love the fact that the bar music that plays in the background ends just as Nash finishes his point. 2:12
It's a Dazed and Confused reunion.
Reminds me of something cool I did the other day.
In her eyes
nash is absolutely amazing
Jhon Nash : Behind every successful event(Nobel prize), there is a lady behind.
And then the blonde is so pissed and curious at being ignored by Nash that she inquires about him and pursues him.
Mhm. And he gets the BJ of his life. 😅
🤣🤣🤣
With a deathly smirk on her face like she knew
takes a real genius to figure that one out
The first MGTOW. 😉
how have I never seen this scene isolated before??? took economics first year uni, and knew about this film beforehand, then watched this film after learning about the Nash Equilibrium to see if I would get it...did not, half because economics killed me and half because I was too caught up in the story to pay any real attention to this scene...fast forward 2 years after, and my mind is getting friggen BLOWN...accuracy in portrayal aside, accuracy to the ACTUAL EQUILIBRIUM aside (there's some watering down, twisting, making fit to the scene, and in any case it's meant to be the spark of the idea not the actual, fully fleshed out theory after however long it was that it took to realise)...still an incredible, history-making breakthrough...
One of the main milestones within the leading path of the Theory of games: firstly-Cournot and his approaches on duopoly; secondly- Von Neumann, who settled down the framework for the analysis ( its fundamentals) thirdly - John Nass, whose insights gave proper form to the likelihood of one perfect equilibrium where after one "contract" the solution chosen would be the worst one, and then a bunch of names from which Joseph Stiglitz could be highlited for widening the framework to insurances and oportunistic behavior. Finally, the theory of games become one of the main tools of an spectrum of models and theories systemized whose name is the Theory of information.
The blonde was intending to show him her breakthrough in unified field theory too. Oh well...
If only Nash had listened.. Damn!!
There are millions of blonds. Only one Nash
great motivation scene
Nash is a genius!
Seems to be a cool man!
The best in the world ,its really inspire story ,i hope to be like him in the next years
It does illustrate though that adam Smith was wrong. That the maximum group utility is not achieved by each person acting in their best said interests..., that only gets you to the Nash equilibrium.
they could've all went after her and enjoyed her at the same time LOL, and then it comes down to who goes last and you face the law of diminishing returns.
Great Video! Love it!
THIS, is my favorite scene
Nash just happened to be the first to scientifically explain and systematize those principles.
Who else has Good Will Hunting "My Boy's Wicked Smart" scene on their next to play?
Great movie direction and Russel crowe performance and the greatest others
One of my favourite scenes in this movie