Great examples applying pricing as payoffs! My game theory course don’t apply prices, as they usually use examples to acknowledge the fundamentals in payoff differences and combinations.
Question 2. You can also think of dominant strategies as: for player 2(quicklunch) strategy H is dominated by strategy L. For player 1 (BB) strategy H is dominated by strategy L.
Can you please Explain Strain proportional to stress, Young's constant , strain, stress , elongated length, initial length, tension, piston's maths , Young's modulus , buoyant force , magnitism and electromagnetism , how electric motor work , Boyles law , density and pressure , pressure difference.............😃😃😃
please solve it Vedios .Word Problem/Case: There are two firms, firm I and firm II, each examining the feasibility of a particular market. Each has to decide to produce and sell either chocolate or chewing gum. If both firms choose to produce and sell chocolate, the firms will incur losses amounting to 180 million and 200 million Birr, respectively. If firm I decide to produce and sell chocolate while firm II chooses to produce and sell chewing gum, their returns will be 120 million and 220 million Birr profits, respectively. However, if both of them decide to produce and sell chewing gum, they will incur losses of 160 million and 200 million Birr, respectively. And finally, if firm I produce and sells chewing gum while firm II produces and sells chocolate, their profits will be 160 million and 180 million Birr, respectively. Based on this information, answer the following questions. A. Write the payoff of matrix for this game. B. Does firm I have a dominant strategy? What about firm II? C. What is the pure strategy Nash equilibrium of the game if the firms decide their strategy simultaneously?
It's not dead when the channel is pushing 8000 videos spanning across tons of subjects and topics. People watch what they need to watch. The same person who subscribed because they found a helpful Pre-Calculus video, isn't going to be watching a Microeconomics game theory video and vice versa.
Good exercise but useless in real life. You can never now what profits your competitor is earning on specific product. At best you could compare shelf prices and make rough assumptions. Also its not a single product, usually there are range of products and product families involved. Demand for products also varies. You could never fill this matrix with correct data.
how does it feels being the goat and saving me before an exam?
Great examples applying pricing as payoffs! My game theory course don’t apply prices, as they usually use examples to acknowledge the fundamentals in payoff differences and combinations.
well explain with good example for me to understand game theory. thank you
Nice way to analyse & interpreate, Thanks.
“Game Theory” the channel that makes theories
Great explanations, really helped. Thanks
Question 2.
You can also think of dominant strategies as: for player 2(quicklunch) strategy H is dominated by strategy L. For player 1 (BB) strategy H is dominated by strategy L.
Can you please Explain Strain proportional to stress, Young's constant , strain, stress , elongated length, initial length, tension, piston's maths , Young's modulus , buoyant force , magnitism and electromagnetism , how electric motor work , Boyles law , density and pressure , pressure difference.............😃😃😃
The only thing I hate about microeconomics is, those damned numbers are so small.
really helpful
What about the payoff to the government official?
That's just a theory...
A Game Theory!
Aaaaaaaaand, Cut!
Yeah, it's "just" a theory which won its brainchild a nobel prize!
please
solve it Vedios .Word Problem/Case:
There are two firms, firm I and firm II, each examining the feasibility of a particular market. Each has to decide to produce and sell either chocolate or chewing gum. If both firms choose to produce and sell chocolate, the firms will incur losses amounting to 180 million and 200 million Birr, respectively. If firm I decide to produce and sell chocolate while firm II chooses to produce and sell chewing gum, their returns will be 120 million and 220 million Birr profits, respectively. However, if both of them decide to produce and sell chewing gum, they will incur losses of 160 million and 200 million Birr, respectively. And finally, if firm I produce and sells chewing gum while firm II produces and sells chocolate, their profits will be 160 million and 180 million Birr, respectively. Based on this information, answer the following questions.
A. Write the payoff of matrix for this game.
B. Does firm I have a dominant strategy? What about firm II?
C. What is the pure strategy Nash equilibrium of the game if the firms decide their strategy simultaneously?
a regular squre pyramid has a slant height of 25m and lateral area of 350m which of these closet to the volume of the pyramid
Did anyone else come here through a link on the 7/11 app lol
Great
Did anybody else think it was Game Theroy
this is game theory
Anime Withered Toy Freddy 1987 I thought it was Game Theory, not Game Theroy.
It was about game theory
thanks a millliooon
please solve this quesion
4.7 million subs, 1k views. Alright, this is officialy the most dead channel I have EVER seen.
It's not dead when the channel is pushing 8000 videos spanning across tons of subjects and topics. People watch what they need to watch. The same person who subscribed because they found a helpful Pre-Calculus video, isn't going to be watching a Microeconomics game theory video and vice versa.
Good exercise but useless in real life. You can never now what profits your competitor is earning on specific product. At best you could compare shelf prices and make rough assumptions. Also its not a single product, usually there are range of products and product families involved. Demand for products also varies. You could never fill this matrix with correct data.