I knew it when I saw the title. I scrolled it quickly and dumped it in less than 20 seconds. I hate this about UA-cam. Whats the purpose? This violates my community standards! BANNED!
You are absolutely right. I have 31 years flying and another 5 years teaching it. Speed increased 5 times !?! Laughable…. how does this stuff get out there?
Do you proofread these videos before uploading them? I think NOT ! You said the engines would cost 22 Billion dollars ??? The total for both jets is suggested to possibly run up to $5 Billion. I think you meant to say 22 Million. You also said the jet would be able to go up to 5 times faster. The air frame of the 747 will not support that kind of speed. I am not a expert but for me to notice such glaring errors on your part is just ridiculous! Read your material before posting!
Not much, if any, technical research is done here in this channel. A supersonic jet would most likely need to be a delta wing or similar, who would seriously rip apart a 747 for that? That's almost as good as a newly developed aircraft....and then piece it together with previously untested new parts for something as demanding and challenging as a president's airplane? And all of that with a fuselage never meant for supersonic flight. GOOD JOKE....
My son is lead Engr. for Boeing out of Portland, Oregon and his group is working on one part of this huge plane. No info given to mom but still proud of his work.
A plane that size and structure could never fly at 5 times the speed of sound , even at high altitude it would simply diintegrate unless it only flies in Unicornalnd
You want Mach 5, the aircraft would have to look like an oversized SR-71, Especially if your carrying the normal complement of people and extra news reporters that get to tag along.
Seems to me that when you're designing an improved (supposedly) Air Force One from the bottom up, you wouldn't leave out the air-to-air refueling feature, which seems like it could be a valuable feature to have when it might be needed. I mean, how hard could it have been to have included that capability in the initial design?
@@charlescarmichael1124 Perhaps but we never anticipated what happened that day either so what will happen next we never anticipated? We don't know what we don't know and to spend all this money leaving the president to a game of chance it stupid.
Yes and did you also know that there are not just two AF1’s? Speaking in terms of how they are outfitted technically yes, with all of the upgrades in security and updates in the interior layout there are only two planes manufactured and in perfect flying condition designated for the president’s use. Though any of the numerous airplanes that are in the Air Force’s flight arsenal have the call sign Air Force 1 when the president is on board.
It's Unconscable not to have the ability to refuel in mid air! It's imperative to give Airforce One the ability to fly longer and further than any other private jet, it's simply common sense, and the ability to refuel as needed!!👍👍👍
I worked at Boeing and it definitely can be refueled in flight! Why do you think that a refueling station flys in conjunction with AF1? Not only do they have these capabilities there is a cargo carrier that lands before the president does wherever he is going. It carries a limo, a Marine 1 copter, refueling stations for these additional transports, parts, mechanics, and other equipment and supplies. As well as multiple jets that fly at different compass points and varying altitudes from AF1.
@@LikeSpee, You beat me to it, @LikeSpee, It's funny how some people when trying to use 2 dollar words, they only use 1 dollar and twenty five cents in letters. Thanks, B.T.
@@BobbyTucker now guys, Apple’s spell correction can pick what word they want to use and the spelling at any time. I had an excellent English and Grammar teacher that was so good that I have to recheck everything I’ve typed before hitting send. All because Mrs Lowe tried to instill it in all of her students brains so that we wouldn’t sound like illiterate hillbillies. It certainly has stuck with me for well over 6 decades.
The narrator stated the four engines cost 22 Billion dollars, I believe four jet engines for the aircraft can cost 22 million bucks, plus tips & gratuities...
The narrator or the writer of the script for this video has embellished obviously. Though not by a whole lot. I believe that the script probably read close to 2 billion, not 22. Each VC 25 engine that GE will provide for the two new presidential aircraft’s are a cost of almost 325 million each. This would put the cost of the engines alone at 1.4 billion by today’s prices. If anything extra or improvements are required then this could push the cost very close to 2 billion. The balance of the cost for each aircraft, that will be manufactured to update and upgrade each to the specifications that are required to make it a presidential signified flying Oval Office, can be seen on the Boeing website. There are many technologies that are designed for these airplanes alone. So Boeing can not just take an already manufactured jet and upgrade it to meet the specifications for what is designated as a plane used by the president on a regular basis. It would cost much more to re-engineer a plane, by removing pretty much the guts of the previously manufactured aircraft. It takes a lot of classified, & patented technology as well as specialized components to be used in a military jet of this design.
You’re right! Any of the 300+ jets that the Air Force has can be a presidential plane when pressed to get him in the air and out of danger. Unless it’s a helicopter, then it’s Marine 1.
Thanks@@BobbyTucker. Wonder if there is talk of manufacturing one to a smaller scale that could work as a glider upon deployment then convert to a jet engine as an escape pod? I know it gets weirder as we talk about what’s possible.
There is a need for red our flag is Red, White and Blue. Not white, blue and red. The red on the new plane is understated but very impressive. There is very little red color on the new planes. But like butt holes we all have our preferences.
Mach 5 Hypersonic Faster than SR-71 Fireball XL5 can attain Solar escape velocity with interstellar range -- must be F.T.L., which means "Back to the Future" capability
I'm sorry Mr. But I still don't see supersonic mentioned anywhere in the advertisement of this video, maybe you should use your nomenclature better next time,..... I'm just saying 🙏🤟
Why is there background :music" in this video. It is especially annoying while the narrator speaks. No one needs to be "entertained" with that "music."
Imagine the cost if they were new! Suppliers to the American government seem to get prices out their arses knowing that whatever they come up with, it'll be paid! (Much like the makers of this video with their "facts!"
Hey Nauctis, Why are you showing a photo of Gerald Ford and some reporter when you state immediately prior that Franklin D. Roosevelt was the first president to use Airforce one??? That makes no sense. You should have shown a photo of Roosevelt.
Hmmmm! So, they are going backwards, I see! The current Air Force One can refuel in mid air, but the new one won't be able to. How much sense does that make? How would the President be able to stay in the air for extended periods of time during a global attack, if it can't refuel in mid air? That's one option that sets Air Force one apart from other world leader's planes! Yeah, good luck with that silly reduced option.
Some of the Declassified info about the current AF1, it currently has mid air refueling capabilities, there are defensive capabilities (they won't disclose what those capabilities are, but it has some) and is nuclear strike proof. Also NO atmospheric aircraft has Mach 5 capabilities yet, even the SR71 has a record speed of Mach 3.4
and he ate a hell of a lot better than America ate. with all of our work, for nothing he capitalizes and makes bank on and always has.. But thank you for supporting the industry. it is appreciated.
How is possible for the engines to cost 22 billion dollars, meanwhile the estimated price of the entire aircraft could possibly cost approximately 5 billion dollars?
Let us not make the same mistake we did in all previous Airforce One. But lacking the very most important defense System: The Missile launchers, visible guns and rear-view system, to watch who is behind you.
Truth is Biden went back to the old livery from the one Trump had ordered as Biden simply undid everything thst he could do that Trump had made a decision on. Hopefully, it's not too late for Trump to order it changed back after he is re-elected.
I hope he DROPS the whole THING and DEMANDS what he demanded before , that was FAR more CAPABLE . NO in air Refueling ?? _SERIOUSLY_ ?? This is way more than being about "Livery" or *PAINT SCHEME* . Biden is so STUPID it takes on elements of CONSCIOUS _EVIL_ .
I imagine that Nancy pelosi is the one that went screaming through the Whitehouse sayinG UNDO EVERY SINGLE THING THAT MAN EVER TOUCHED OR SIGNED OR HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH!!!!! HE REBUFFED MY SMILE SO HE IS OFFICIALLY SMITTEN FROM THIS EARTH!!!!!!
Dont be so sure. I was 10 in 1969 when we put men on the moon. I remember thinking surly I would be abe to go in 20 or 30 more years......never happened.
Why take it down unless this is fake news as in other videos that are simulations from gameplay videos just so the video shows a false picture of a new military piece strictly for views. Is this real or made up for views only. Will there be no response as usual?
The second time you mention President Eisenhower you show a photo from October 16, 1958 - First Lady Mamie Eisenhower and Pan Am Chairman Juan Trippe. The Boeing 707-121, the plane that inaugurated the commercial jet age for the United States with its flight from New York to Paris. President Eisenhower is not in the photo.
If they're wrong about the plane being able to fly at an impossible 3500+ mph then they're likely wrong about many other things, like airborne refueling. The new Air Force One may not even be a Boeing. I hear Airbus can build a jet that doesn't have pieces fall off at 20,000 ft.
The title says that the new Air Force one will fly faster than five times the speed of sound. The speed of sound is 767.3 miles per hour. If the new Air Force one flew five times faster, it would be traveling at 3835 miles per hour. Not even the SR71 reconnaissance jet can fly that fast. Its top speed was 2193 miles per hour.
Not quite! If the President is flying in an aircraft from any branch of the military, then the call sign will be the service name One. Navy One was used when George Bush flew in a Lockheed S-3A Viking on and off of the USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72.
BRIEF BLOG: AS OF 3/26/2024, THE NEW AF-One is still being built at a few AF Presidential sites, one of which is in Texas. It is said to debut in the Spring of 2027. Stay tuned. It'll be the new Boeing 747-8 VIP Air Force One.
Franklin D. Roosevelt the presenter says while showing a picture of Pres. Gerald Ford. That should give some validity and credibility to the rest of the video.
There is no supersonic 747 but I do think Emerites is working on a supersonic A380.... That's what the leader of the free world should be in even if it's today's version.
No aerial refuelling could be a weak point, why is this feature not required in this new Air Force One. Since every option is a must for the President's survival.?.
Actually the first aircraft built for the US President was a C-82 Liberator Express named Guess Where II and I know that it was used to fly Franklin Delano Roosevelt at least a few times. The first aircraft to ever fly the US President white in office was a Pan American Airlines (commonly known as Pan Am) Boeing 314. SAM 26000 was used by Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. Why no Aerial refueling, that's kinda stupid?
The Boeing 747s that are in present day use and the ones being made for future use as Air Force One are highly specialized and highly customized aircraft for the primary use of transporting the president of the United States and designed to be a flying White House. So it is not surprising that these Boeing 747s are very expensive and no other aircraft is like these aircraft. I am sure there are various items about these aircraft that are classified top secret.
NOT ONE WORD about a supersonic Airforce One. I really hate these UA-camrs that have grossly misleading titles.
So much click bait, I’m blocking this channel
I knew it when I saw the title. I scrolled it quickly and dumped it in less than 20 seconds. I hate this about UA-cam. Whats the purpose? This violates my community standards! BANNED!
False and misleading
THATS WHY I GAVE HIM A THUMBS DOWN 👎
grounds for murder
You would think that refueling in the air would be a MUST in case of emergency
Way too many inaccuracies in this video to count.
You are absolutely right.
I have 31 years flying and another 5 years teaching it.
Speed increased 5 times !?!
Laughable…. how does this stuff get out there?
At 9 minutes, he is talking about FDR while showing a picture of Gerald Ford.
@@CharlesMoore-x3o
And couldn't find a photo of Nixon either.
That’s why I stopped watching it after thirty seconds.
Totally agree regarding bogus headlines that have nothing to do with the actual content.
Do you proofread these videos before uploading them? I think NOT ! You said the engines would cost 22 Billion dollars ??? The total for both jets is suggested to possibly run up to $5 Billion. I think you meant to say 22 Million. You also said the jet would be able to go up to 5 times faster. The air frame of the 747 will not support that kind of speed. I am not a expert but for me to notice such glaring errors on your part is just ridiculous! Read your material before posting!
Not much, if any, technical research is done here in this channel. A supersonic jet would most likely need to be a delta wing or similar, who would seriously rip apart a 747 for that? That's almost as good as a newly developed aircraft....and then piece it together with previously untested new parts for something as demanding and challenging as a president's airplane? And all of that with a fuselage never meant for supersonic flight. GOOD JOKE....
The picture looks like a modified L1011
They don't even proof their historical photos.
The 74 can break the sound barrier but I will shudder and things start to break
He called Ford, Nixon.
The title is a lie. Lies get thumbs down.
Mrs. Kennedy's color scheme is STILL an elegant design.
Mrs. Kennedy persueded her friend, Raymond Lowey, to design the livery for the Boeing 707 that was used to transport the president.
@@itgoestoeleven ...as mentioned above.
She didn’t design it, she only “selected” the design & color.
My Man,, When You Say The Colors Of Our Flag,, Never Say,, WHITE RED BLUE... IT'S. """RED WHITE BLUE """...YOU GOT THAT...PAL!!!
Shifty Convict Clown 🤡 speech.
Amen! Red is always on top!
And the colours of the British flag are also red, white and blue. You got that, pal?
@@davidlauder-qi5zv 👏🏼
@@ebnolan3856 Meaning you didn't know?
My son is lead Engr. for Boeing out of Portland, Oregon and his group is working on one part of this huge plane.
No info given to mom but still proud of his work.
😢
I hate to break this to you janet, but he's really a drug trafficker. Its hard to get out...
Please tell him to check the bolts
His job is quality control on the parts, works on the computer only as lead Engr. Only blisters on his finger tips.@@paulfiore7083
Congratulations Janet, that is quite something to be proud of. (I am an engineer, albeit, not an aircraft engineer.)
A plane that size and structure could never fly at 5 times the speed of sound , even at high altitude it would simply diintegrate unless it only flies in Unicornalnd
What I was thinking. No way it can fly that fast.
clickbait !
I think that the narrator said 5 X the old plane. No inflight refueling is BS I do not know how the air force could allow that.
You want Mach 5, the aircraft would have to look like an oversized SR-71, Especially if your carrying the normal complement of people and extra news reporters that get to tag along.
I bet it won't even go 4 times the speed of sound!
Seems to me that when you're designing an improved (supposedly) Air Force One from the bottom up, you wouldn't leave out the air-to-air refueling feature, which seems like it could be a valuable feature to have when it might be needed. I mean, how hard could it have been to have included that capability in the initial design?
Apparently according to BETTER videos, it is pretty difficult to retrofit the 800's and they apparently have never used it. Even on 9/11.
@@charlescarmichael1124
Perhaps but we never anticipated what happened that day either so what will happen next we never anticipated? We don't know what we don't know and to spend all this money leaving the president to a game of chance it stupid.
THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX.
IT WILL HAVE AN INFINITE FUEL SOURCE.
WE ARE HEADED TO NON FOSSIL FUEL
CONVEYANCES FROM PLANES TO LAWN MOWERS.
@@RoseMarieComtois Not as long as Trump is President. "Fossil Fuel" is Trump's middle name.
The plane is only "air force one" when the President is on board
Yes and did you also know that there are not just two AF1’s? Speaking in terms of how they are outfitted technically yes, with all of the upgrades in security and updates in the interior layout there are only two planes manufactured and in perfect flying condition designated for the president’s use.
Though any of the numerous airplanes that are in the Air Force’s flight arsenal have the call sign Air Force 1 when the president is on board.
Correct
The president could be aboard a single engine piper cub and it would be designated as Air Force 1
Cool, did not know that.
B-747 beautiful plane ever !
The light blue and white, from the 60s is classic. Hope it remains
It's Unconscable not to have the ability to refuel in mid air! It's imperative to give Airforce One the ability to fly longer and further than any other private jet, it's simply common sense, and the ability to refuel as needed!!👍👍👍
The third AF one, the doomsday aircraft does have that feature. I’ve seen it at then Patrick AFB
I worked at Boeing and it definitely can be refueled in flight! Why do you think that a refueling station flys in conjunction with AF1? Not only do they have these capabilities there is a cargo carrier that lands before the president does wherever he is going. It carries a limo, a Marine 1 copter, refueling stations for these additional transports, parts, mechanics, and other equipment and supplies. As well as multiple jets that fly at different compass points and varying altitudes from AF1.
Unconscable huh 🤔Did you make that up on the fly 😂
@@LikeSpee,
You beat me to it, @LikeSpee, It's funny how some people when trying to use 2 dollar words, they only use 1 dollar and twenty five cents in letters. Thanks, B.T.
@@BobbyTucker now guys, Apple’s spell correction can pick what word they want to use and the spelling at any time. I had an excellent English and Grammar teacher that was so good that I have to recheck everything I’ve typed before hitting send. All because Mrs Lowe tried to instill it in all of her students brains so that we wouldn’t sound like illiterate hillbillies. It certainly has stuck with me for well over 6 decades.
This is a very worrying situation where it CANNOT BE REFUELLED IN MID AIR. This a DOWNGRADE.
The new AF1 is only going to cost 5.3 billion dollars, but the generator upgrade is 22 billion. Don't you mean 22 million, and not billion?
Bunch of BS No Generator cost 22 million dollars .. maybe $200,000 at the most!! For a generator!!
The narrator stated the four engines cost 22 Billion dollars, I believe four jet engines for the aircraft can cost 22 million bucks, plus tips & gratuities...
The narrator or the writer of the script for this video has embellished obviously. Though not by a whole lot. I believe that the script probably read close to 2 billion, not 22. Each VC 25 engine that GE will provide for the two new presidential aircraft’s are a cost of almost 325 million each. This would put the cost of the engines alone at 1.4 billion by today’s prices. If anything extra or improvements are required then this could push the cost very close to 2 billion.
The balance of the cost for each aircraft, that will be manufactured to update and upgrade each to the specifications that are required to make it a presidential signified flying Oval Office, can be seen on the Boeing website.
There are many technologies that are designed for these airplanes alone. So Boeing can not just take an already manufactured jet and upgrade it to meet the specifications for what is designated as a plane used by the president on a regular basis.
It would cost much more to re-engineer a plane, by removing pretty much the guts of the previously manufactured aircraft. It takes a lot of classified, & patented technology as well as specialized components to be used in a military jet of this design.
Just a simple FYI....lol Technically, “Air Force One” is used to designate any Air Force aircraft carrying the President.
at the moment
You’re right! Any of the 300+ jets that the Air Force has can be a presidential plane when pressed to get him in the air and out of danger. Unless it’s a helicopter, then it’s Marine 1.
@@ebnolan3856,
There is an SR-71 that can handle two human beings also.
Thanks@@BobbyTucker. Wonder if there is talk of manufacturing one to a smaller scale that could work as a glider upon deployment then convert to a jet engine as an escape pod? I know it gets weirder as we talk about what’s possible.
I like the current paint job. Looks Presidential, but understated. No need for red. However, I am wondering about no air to air refueling.
There is a need for red our flag is Red, White and Blue. Not white, blue and red. The red on the new plane is understated but very impressive. There is very little red color on the new planes. But like butt holes we all have our preferences.
Great plane but as someone said already impossible to fly 5X the speed of sound.
Mach 5
Hypersonic
Faster than SR-71
Fireball XL5 can attain Solar escape velocity with interstellar range --
must be F.T.L., which means "Back to the Future" capability
Just wondering if that elevator and wheelchair is meant for JB..
love the new airplane for the presidential office and I love the old color scheme goes well with the plane
AtA refueling seems very significant to omit!
I'm sorry Mr. But I still don't see supersonic mentioned anywhere in the advertisement of this video, maybe you should use your nomenclature better next time,..... I'm just saying 🙏🤟
Why is there background :music" in this video. It is especially annoying while the narrator speaks. No one needs to be "entertained" with that "music."
Only one of dozens of bad editing screwups.
inside looks like Star Trek
I like the new Air Force One is really Cool. 😎 I’m not sure 🤔 why nobody like the new Air Force One plane. It’s more like a presidential aircraft.
Imagine the cost if they were new! Suppliers to the American government seem to get prices out their arses knowing that whatever they come up with, it'll be paid! (Much like the makers of this video with their "facts!"
MADE IN USA ALWAYS POWERFUL N BEAUTIFUL, ONLY MADE POSSIBLE IN USA AND THE ENTIRE WORLD
Everything on the internet is 100% true man! EVERYTHING! Even information about top secret airplanes man!
would love to get a tour one day
Wow, Super aircraft.
22 billion for the engines? Don't think so.
Hey Nauctis, Why are you showing a photo of Gerald Ford and some reporter when you state immediately prior that Franklin D. Roosevelt was the first president to use Airforce one??? That makes no sense. You should have shown a photo of Roosevelt.
Only one of dozens of bad editing screwups.
Now that is how the Prez is suppose to fly
Hmmmm! So, they are going backwards, I see! The current Air Force One can refuel in mid air, but the new one won't be able to. How much sense does that make? How would the President be able to stay in the air for extended periods of time during a global attack, if it can't refuel in mid air? That's one option that sets Air Force one apart from other world leader's planes! Yeah, good luck with that silly reduced option.
That is a stupid decision.
Very Good!
Hypersonic 747 that would be some feat 😂😂😂😂
If stuff becomes reality no one has any right to refuse it’s existence.
Boeing loses money on every sale, but they make it up in volume.
Some of the Declassified info about the current AF1, it currently has mid air refueling capabilities, there are defensive capabilities (they won't disclose what those capabilities are, but it has some) and is nuclear strike proof. Also NO atmospheric aircraft has Mach 5 capabilities yet, even the SR71 has a record speed of Mach 3.4
Air force One needs to be small with scram jets and full stealth tech. All it has to do is make it to Antarctica, where they have extensive support.
With the 2 new advanced 'Air Force One' aircraft to be put into operation, what is to be done with the 2 old AF1 planes ???
$22 Billion for the engines alone???? How does that square with $5 Billion price-tag each for AF-1 and AF-2? Stopped watching at 4:58
OK, where is the Air Force One that flies at Mach 5??????? This is just click bait. Pathetic.
Perfect ❤
Gonna Need It😂
JRB needs a wheel chair ramp but at this stage of the game maybe just shove him out and before it lands.
ROTFLMAO!!! Go fer' it!
There is one bozo every day and today you are the one.
No 747 flying is capable of flying even close to Mach1 , this statement is BS
and he ate a hell of a lot better than America ate. with all of our work, for nothing he capitalizes and makes bank on and always has.. But thank you for supporting the industry. it is appreciated.
Make sure to brief Harrison Ford, you know, just in case.😂
How is possible for the engines to cost 22 billion dollars, meanwhile the estimated price of the entire aircraft could possibly cost approximately 5 billion dollars?
Given recent events, does Boeing guaranty the doors and wheels will stay on?
I don't understand why these kind of fake stuff isn't simply banned by UA-cam.
I love how Donald Trump is updating the color scheme a reflection of JFK
God Bless America
You showed a picture of Gerald R. Ford when talking about 1st president to fly on Air Force 1 was FDR.
Let us not make the same mistake we did in all previous Airforce One. But lacking the very most important defense System: The Missile launchers, visible guns and rear-view system, to
watch who is behind you.
Shame on your fake headlines and bogus report. NB: Get lost. Amen & Amen
Truth is Biden went back to the old livery from the one Trump had ordered as Biden simply undid everything thst he could do that Trump had made a decision on. Hopefully, it's not too late for Trump to order it changed back after he is re-elected.
I hope he DROPS the whole THING and DEMANDS what he demanded before , that was FAR more CAPABLE . NO in air Refueling ?? _SERIOUSLY_ ?? This is way more than being about "Livery" or *PAINT SCHEME* . Biden is so STUPID it takes on elements of CONSCIOUS _EVIL_ .
I imagine that Nancy pelosi is the one that went screaming through the Whitehouse sayinG UNDO EVERY SINGLE THING THAT MAN EVER TOUCHED OR SIGNED OR HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH!!!!! HE REBUFFED MY SMILE SO HE IS OFFICIALLY SMITTEN FROM THIS EARTH!!!!!!
Trump can't change a damned thing from prison.
@@denniss1044 dream on.
The damn ring looks like a fighter jet.
WE WILL JUST VOTE TO CHANGE THE COLOR BACK THE WAY PRESIDENT TRUMP WANTS IT HECK WITH THEM DEMOCRATS BEING CHARGED ANYWAY IN 2024 OH YEAH OH YEAH
Why will not include the air-to-air refueling capability? I would think that function would be a given.
I know later in the future there’s going to be a supersonic Air Force 1 because the future is coming!!!
Dont be so sure. I was 10 in 1969 when we put men on the moon. I remember thinking surly I would be abe to go in 20 or 30 more years......never happened.
I got to fly one time on a 747 across the Atlantic it was amazing I understand why it's called dreamliner
787 is dreamliner!
Several delays,that Secenario sounds familiar.the speaker sounds like he might have came from an actor contract company. 😮
Why take it down unless this is fake news as in other videos that are simulations from gameplay videos just so the video shows a false picture of a new military piece strictly for views.
Is this real or made up for views only. Will there be no response as usual?
Its called Bait and Switch
I would really like to see how the landing gear on the illustration works. 😂
Just when i thought i have seen everything.
Nice Video.
The second time you mention President Eisenhower you show a photo from October 16, 1958 - First Lady Mamie Eisenhower and Pan Am Chairman Juan Trippe. The Boeing 707-121, the plane that inaugurated the commercial jet age for the United States with its flight from New York to Paris. President Eisenhower is not in the photo.
If they're wrong about the plane being able to fly at an impossible 3500+ mph then they're likely wrong about many other things, like airborne refueling.
The new Air Force One may not even be a Boeing. I hear Airbus can build a jet that doesn't have pieces fall off at 20,000 ft.
OMG! If Biden had one of those planes he'd be taking 3 day weekends on the beaches of Italy and Greece instead of Delaware😂
And I wouldn't blame him...
That motor on the left sure is moving a lot.. @7:33
The title says that the new Air Force one will fly faster than five times the speed of sound. The speed of sound is 767.3 miles per hour. If the new Air Force one flew five times faster, it would be traveling at 3835 miles per hour. Not even the SR71 reconnaissance jet can fly that fast. Its top speed was 2193 miles per hour.
Can't refuel? Will the doors stay on?
Trump gets this new AF1 in 24,go Trump ❤❤❤❤❤
Apparently u weren't listening lol. Said it wouldn't be ready until 2027 and trump will be in prison anyways 🤷♂️
Long live America 🇺🇸🌍🐘🦄🦅🦁🐯👌💐✌👈👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍
DJT's private jet is so gangster.
Is their provision for extra pilots and their comfort, or are the two pilots suppose to pilot the aircraft for days in a cramped space.
Autopilots from the movie "Airplane" earned their "Stripes" there.
A 747 is shown crashing into the airport terminal near the end of
the movie.
Air Force One designation is ANY airplane when the US President is onboard.
Not quite! If the President is flying in an aircraft from any branch of the military, then the call sign will be the service name One. Navy One was used when George Bush flew in a Lockheed S-3A Viking on and off of the USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72.
Well, it definitely looks like something presidential. Or at least suitable for a dictator for a day.😅
Its RED WHITE and BLUE. In that order only. Thank you! USA!
BRIEF BLOG: AS OF 3/26/2024, THE NEW AF-One is still being built at a few AF Presidential sites, one of which is in Texas. It is said to debut in the Spring of 2027. Stay tuned. It'll be the new Boeing 747-8 VIP Air Force One.
What happens to them when they are replaced? Scrapped?
I stopped watching after hearing "turbine engine propellers" and 5X speed increase...
It is important to have intercept missiles with the air plane in case enemy launches missile to the plane.
$22 BILLION DOLLAR ENGINES???😂😂😂
But no $1K "turlet" seats, because gold plating costs more than that
The plane should reflect the colors of the flag. The blue should be darker like on the flag.
Click Bait...
I didn't get the memo, but we telling our kids that Roosevelt and Nixon were different people now?
Franklin D. Roosevelt the presenter says while showing a picture of Pres. Gerald Ford. That should give some validity and credibility to the rest of the video.
I bet it would be 5 times as expensive as any Air Force One before too.
I need not see the video to understand it is a hoax! If THAT structure is hypersonic, then the Ford model T is a race car!
No mid air refueling? What are they thinking ? That’s absolutely foolish ! They have to have refueling in flight. That’s a cover your butt maneuver !
There is no supersonic 747 but I do think Emerites is working on a supersonic A380.... That's what the leader of the free world should be in even if it's today's version.
No aerial refuelling could be a weak point, why is this feature not required in this new Air Force One. Since every option is a must for the President's survival.?.
Actually the first aircraft built for the US President was a C-82 Liberator Express named Guess Where II and I know that it was used to fly Franklin Delano Roosevelt at least a few times. The first aircraft to ever fly the US President white in office was a Pan American Airlines (commonly known as Pan Am) Boeing 314. SAM 26000 was used by Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. Why no Aerial refueling, that's kinda stupid?
The Boeing 747s that are in present day use and the ones being made for future use as Air Force One are highly specialized and highly customized aircraft for the primary use of transporting the president of the United States and designed to be a flying White House. So it is not surprising that these Boeing 747s are very expensive and no other aircraft is like these aircraft. I am sure there are various items about these aircraft that are classified top secret.
what a strange title???
The closest we have to a supersonic passenger jet is from Gulfstream, and even then it's not designed for it.
Another few hundred million for all the solid gold toilets.