REVEALED: INSIDE NEW AIR FORCE ONE That Flies at 5 Times Speed of Sound

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 23 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 593

  • @davidmccartney3433
    @davidmccartney3433 Рік тому +379

    NOT ONE WORD about a supersonic Airforce One. I really hate these UA-camrs that have grossly misleading titles.

    • @101bennyc
      @101bennyc Рік тому +19

      So much click bait, I’m blocking this channel

    • @jefife750
      @jefife750 Рік тому +24

      I knew it when I saw the title. I scrolled it quickly and dumped it in less than 20 seconds. I hate this about UA-cam. Whats the purpose? This violates my community standards! BANNED!

    • @overlord5580
      @overlord5580 Рік тому +20

      False and misleading

    • @gtbproductions1
      @gtbproductions1 Рік тому +13

      THATS WHY I GAVE HIM A THUMBS DOWN 👎

    • @ME-bw3rl
      @ME-bw3rl Рік тому

      grounds for murder

  • @arleighj7053
    @arleighj7053 10 місяців тому +45

    You would think that refueling in the air would be a MUST in case of emergency

  • @orlandocabrera2107
    @orlandocabrera2107 11 місяців тому +93

    Way too many inaccuracies in this video to count.

    • @wstowe747
      @wstowe747 10 місяців тому +5

      You are absolutely right.
      I have 31 years flying and another 5 years teaching it.
      Speed increased 5 times !?!
      Laughable…. how does this stuff get out there?

    • @CharlesMoore-x3o
      @CharlesMoore-x3o 8 місяців тому +4

      At 9 minutes, he is talking about FDR while showing a picture of Gerald Ford.

    • @larrybe2900
      @larrybe2900 8 місяців тому +3

      @@CharlesMoore-x3o
      And couldn't find a photo of Nixon either.

    • @joesmith1574
      @joesmith1574 19 годин тому +1

      That’s why I stopped watching it after thirty seconds.

  • @michaelkoscec4113
    @michaelkoscec4113 11 місяців тому +73

    Totally agree regarding bogus headlines that have nothing to do with the actual content.

  • @zxatl2003
    @zxatl2003 Рік тому +68

    Do you proofread these videos before uploading them? I think NOT ! You said the engines would cost 22 Billion dollars ??? The total for both jets is suggested to possibly run up to $5 Billion. I think you meant to say 22 Million. You also said the jet would be able to go up to 5 times faster. The air frame of the 747 will not support that kind of speed. I am not a expert but for me to notice such glaring errors on your part is just ridiculous! Read your material before posting!

    • @amurtigress_mobile365
      @amurtigress_mobile365 11 місяців тому +3

      Not much, if any, technical research is done here in this channel. A supersonic jet would most likely need to be a delta wing or similar, who would seriously rip apart a 747 for that? That's almost as good as a newly developed aircraft....and then piece it together with previously untested new parts for something as demanding and challenging as a president's airplane? And all of that with a fuselage never meant for supersonic flight. GOOD JOKE....

    • @jeffscott6656
      @jeffscott6656 11 місяців тому +3

      The picture looks like a modified L1011

    • @timvaldez6537
      @timvaldez6537 11 місяців тому

      They don't even proof their historical photos.

    • @jasoncentore1830
      @jasoncentore1830 7 місяців тому

      The 74 can break the sound barrier but I will shudder and things start to break

    • @Darrell-su2hr
      @Darrell-su2hr 5 місяців тому +1

      He called Ford, Nixon.

  • @dustinchase9187
    @dustinchase9187 Рік тому +62

    The title is a lie. Lies get thumbs down.

  • @jerrycallender-qm7zr
    @jerrycallender-qm7zr 11 місяців тому +49

    Mrs. Kennedy's color scheme is STILL an elegant design.

    • @itgoestoeleven
      @itgoestoeleven 8 місяців тому +2

      Mrs. Kennedy persueded her friend, Raymond Lowey, to design the livery for the Boeing 707 that was used to transport the president.

    • @jerrycallender-qm7zr
      @jerrycallender-qm7zr 8 місяців тому +2

      @@itgoestoeleven ...as mentioned above.

    • @normanklature6014
      @normanklature6014 25 днів тому

      She didn’t design it, she only “selected” the design & color.

  • @Wayne-gb5pu
    @Wayne-gb5pu Рік тому +39

    My Man,, When You Say The Colors Of Our Flag,, Never Say,, WHITE RED BLUE... IT'S. """RED WHITE BLUE """...YOU GOT THAT...PAL!!!

    • @johnlicht9151
      @johnlicht9151 11 місяців тому +1

      Shifty Convict Clown 🤡 speech.

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 11 місяців тому +1

      Amen! Red is always on top!

    • @davidlauder-qi5zv
      @davidlauder-qi5zv 9 місяців тому

      And the colours of the British flag are also red, white and blue. You got that, pal?

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 9 місяців тому

      @@davidlauder-qi5zv 👏🏼

    • @davidlauder-qi5zv
      @davidlauder-qi5zv 9 місяців тому

      @@ebnolan3856 Meaning you didn't know?

  • @janetceniza8091
    @janetceniza8091 Рік тому +35

    My son is lead Engr. for Boeing out of Portland, Oregon and his group is working on one part of this huge plane.
    No info given to mom but still proud of his work.

    • @jeffscott6656
      @jeffscott6656 11 місяців тому +1

      😢

    • @LikeSpee
      @LikeSpee 11 місяців тому +3

      I hate to break this to you janet, but he's really a drug trafficker. Its hard to get out...

    • @paulfiore7083
      @paulfiore7083 11 місяців тому +3

      Please tell him to check the bolts

    • @janetceniza8091
      @janetceniza8091 11 місяців тому

      His job is quality control on the parts, works on the computer only as lead Engr. Only blisters on his finger tips.@@paulfiore7083

    • @brentbarnhart5827
      @brentbarnhart5827 11 місяців тому

      Congratulations Janet, that is quite something to be proud of. (I am an engineer, albeit, not an aircraft engineer.)

  • @Cazador60140
    @Cazador60140 Рік тому +56

    A plane that size and structure could never fly at 5 times the speed of sound , even at high altitude it would simply diintegrate unless it only flies in Unicornalnd

    • @mikelee7318
      @mikelee7318 Рік тому +4

      What I was thinking. No way it can fly that fast.

    • @tscotom
      @tscotom Рік тому +8

      clickbait !

    • @Eclipse-ss7ko
      @Eclipse-ss7ko Рік тому

      I think that the narrator said 5 X the old plane. No inflight refueling is BS I do not know how the air force could allow that.

    • @trains4one
      @trains4one Рік тому +2

      You want Mach 5, the aircraft would have to look like an oversized SR-71, Especially if your carrying the normal complement of people and extra news reporters that get to tag along.

    • @jaydee4009
      @jaydee4009 11 місяців тому +2

      I bet it won't even go 4 times the speed of sound!

  • @jaydee4009
    @jaydee4009 11 місяців тому +19

    Seems to me that when you're designing an improved (supposedly) Air Force One from the bottom up, you wouldn't leave out the air-to-air refueling feature, which seems like it could be a valuable feature to have when it might be needed. I mean, how hard could it have been to have included that capability in the initial design?

    • @charlescarmichael1124
      @charlescarmichael1124 11 місяців тому +1

      Apparently according to BETTER videos, it is pretty difficult to retrofit the 800's and they apparently have never used it. Even on 9/11.

    • @larrybe2900
      @larrybe2900 8 місяців тому

      @@charlescarmichael1124
      Perhaps but we never anticipated what happened that day either so what will happen next we never anticipated? We don't know what we don't know and to spend all this money leaving the president to a game of chance it stupid.

    • @RoseMarieComtois
      @RoseMarieComtois 2 дні тому

      THINK OUTSIDE THE BOX.
      IT WILL HAVE AN INFINITE FUEL SOURCE.
      WE ARE HEADED TO NON FOSSIL FUEL
      CONVEYANCES FROM PLANES TO LAWN MOWERS.

    • @jaydee4009
      @jaydee4009 2 дні тому

      @@RoseMarieComtois Not as long as Trump is President. "Fossil Fuel" is Trump's middle name.

  • @davescott7669
    @davescott7669 Рік тому +29

    The plane is only "air force one" when the President is on board

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 11 місяців тому +1

      Yes and did you also know that there are not just two AF1’s? Speaking in terms of how they are outfitted technically yes, with all of the upgrades in security and updates in the interior layout there are only two planes manufactured and in perfect flying condition designated for the president’s use.
      Though any of the numerous airplanes that are in the Air Force’s flight arsenal have the call sign Air Force 1 when the president is on board.

    • @PatLyons88
      @PatLyons88 2 місяці тому

      Correct

    • @LV2XPLR
      @LV2XPLR Місяць тому +1

      The president could be aboard a single engine piper cub and it would be designated as Air Force 1

    • @kellyw6652
      @kellyw6652 12 днів тому

      Cool, did not know that.

  • @slobodanfemic4481
    @slobodanfemic4481 10 місяців тому +15

    B-747 beautiful plane ever !

  • @1aikane
    @1aikane Місяць тому +5

    The light blue and white, from the 60s is classic. Hope it remains

  • @exposingthedarknesswiththe9190
    @exposingthedarknesswiththe9190 11 місяців тому +36

    It's Unconscable not to have the ability to refuel in mid air! It's imperative to give Airforce One the ability to fly longer and further than any other private jet, it's simply common sense, and the ability to refuel as needed!!👍👍👍

    • @oldchuckie1874
      @oldchuckie1874 11 місяців тому +1

      The third AF one, the doomsday aircraft does have that feature. I’ve seen it at then Patrick AFB

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 11 місяців тому +2

      I worked at Boeing and it definitely can be refueled in flight! Why do you think that a refueling station flys in conjunction with AF1? Not only do they have these capabilities there is a cargo carrier that lands before the president does wherever he is going. It carries a limo, a Marine 1 copter, refueling stations for these additional transports, parts, mechanics, and other equipment and supplies. As well as multiple jets that fly at different compass points and varying altitudes from AF1.

    • @LikeSpee
      @LikeSpee 11 місяців тому +4

      Unconscable huh 🤔Did you make that up on the fly 😂

    • @BobbyTucker
      @BobbyTucker 11 місяців тому

      @@LikeSpee,
      You beat me to it, @LikeSpee, It's funny how some people when trying to use 2 dollar words, they only use 1 dollar and twenty five cents in letters. Thanks, B.T.

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 11 місяців тому +1

      @@BobbyTucker now guys, Apple’s spell correction can pick what word they want to use and the spelling at any time. I had an excellent English and Grammar teacher that was so good that I have to recheck everything I’ve typed before hitting send. All because Mrs Lowe tried to instill it in all of her students brains so that we wouldn’t sound like illiterate hillbillies. It certainly has stuck with me for well over 6 decades.

  • @mohammedali808
    @mohammedali808 Рік тому +17

    This is a very worrying situation where it CANNOT BE REFUELLED IN MID AIR. This a DOWNGRADE.

  • @michaelcolley1324
    @michaelcolley1324 Рік тому +24

    The new AF1 is only going to cost 5.3 billion dollars, but the generator upgrade is 22 billion. Don't you mean 22 million, and not billion?

    • @michaelloder5150
      @michaelloder5150 11 місяців тому +1

      Bunch of BS No Generator cost 22 million dollars .. maybe $200,000 at the most!! For a generator!!

    • @BobbyTucker
      @BobbyTucker 11 місяців тому

      The narrator stated the four engines cost 22 Billion dollars, I believe four jet engines for the aircraft can cost 22 million bucks, plus tips & gratuities...

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 11 місяців тому

      The narrator or the writer of the script for this video has embellished obviously. Though not by a whole lot. I believe that the script probably read close to 2 billion, not 22. Each VC 25 engine that GE will provide for the two new presidential aircraft’s are a cost of almost 325 million each. This would put the cost of the engines alone at 1.4 billion by today’s prices. If anything extra or improvements are required then this could push the cost very close to 2 billion.
      The balance of the cost for each aircraft, that will be manufactured to update and upgrade each to the specifications that are required to make it a presidential signified flying Oval Office, can be seen on the Boeing website.
      There are many technologies that are designed for these airplanes alone. So Boeing can not just take an already manufactured jet and upgrade it to meet the specifications for what is designated as a plane used by the president on a regular basis.
      It would cost much more to re-engineer a plane, by removing pretty much the guts of the previously manufactured aircraft. It takes a lot of classified, & patented technology as well as specialized components to be used in a military jet of this design.

  • @marvinisit
    @marvinisit Рік тому +22

    Just a simple FYI....lol Technically, “Air Force One” is used to designate any Air Force aircraft carrying the President.

    • @stuuuporman
      @stuuuporman Рік тому +2

      at the moment

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 11 місяців тому +2

      You’re right! Any of the 300+ jets that the Air Force has can be a presidential plane when pressed to get him in the air and out of danger. Unless it’s a helicopter, then it’s Marine 1.

    • @BobbyTucker
      @BobbyTucker 11 місяців тому +1

      @@ebnolan3856,
      There is an SR-71 that can handle two human beings also.

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 11 місяців тому

      Thanks@@BobbyTucker. Wonder if there is talk of manufacturing one to a smaller scale that could work as a glider upon deployment then convert to a jet engine as an escape pod? I know it gets weirder as we talk about what’s possible.

  • @stuuuporman
    @stuuuporman Рік тому +14

    I like the current paint job. Looks Presidential, but understated. No need for red. However, I am wondering about no air to air refueling.

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 11 місяців тому +1

      There is a need for red our flag is Red, White and Blue. Not white, blue and red. The red on the new plane is understated but very impressive. There is very little red color on the new planes. But like butt holes we all have our preferences.

  • @gjurczyc
    @gjurczyc Рік тому +12

    Great plane but as someone said already impossible to fly 5X the speed of sound.

    • @2hcobda2
      @2hcobda2 Рік тому +2

      Mach 5
      Hypersonic
      Faster than SR-71
      Fireball XL5 can attain Solar escape velocity with interstellar range --
      must be F.T.L., which means "Back to the Future" capability

  • @carlmassey8837
    @carlmassey8837 11 місяців тому +8

    Just wondering if that elevator and wheelchair is meant for JB..

  • @samuelrodriguez9673
    @samuelrodriguez9673 7 місяців тому +2

    love the new airplane for the presidential office and I love the old color scheme goes well with the plane

  • @kyosanim9581
    @kyosanim9581 Рік тому +15

    AtA refueling seems very significant to omit!

  • @PedroG-xh6lh
    @PedroG-xh6lh 11 місяців тому +4

    I'm sorry Mr. But I still don't see supersonic mentioned anywhere in the advertisement of this video, maybe you should use your nomenclature better next time,..... I'm just saying 🙏🤟

  • @craigr.h.laurent240
    @craigr.h.laurent240 11 місяців тому +4

    Why is there background :music" in this video. It is especially annoying while the narrator speaks. No one needs to be "entertained" with that "music."

    • @MomolosZtips
      @MomolosZtips 5 місяців тому

      Only one of dozens of bad editing screwups.

  • @thomw4434
    @thomw4434 11 місяців тому +5

    inside looks like Star Trek

  • @CoolDave-tc7hb
    @CoolDave-tc7hb 8 місяців тому +3

    I like the new Air Force One is really Cool. 😎 I’m not sure 🤔 why nobody like the new Air Force One plane. It’s more like a presidential aircraft.

  • @oxcart4172
    @oxcart4172 Рік тому +8

    Imagine the cost if they were new! Suppliers to the American government seem to get prices out their arses knowing that whatever they come up with, it'll be paid! (Much like the makers of this video with their "facts!"

  • @tanpengjoo7205
    @tanpengjoo7205 4 дні тому +1

    MADE IN USA ALWAYS POWERFUL N BEAUTIFUL, ONLY MADE POSSIBLE IN USA AND THE ENTIRE WORLD

  • @brandonspaulding8097
    @brandonspaulding8097 8 місяців тому +1

    Everything on the internet is 100% true man! EVERYTHING! Even information about top secret airplanes man!

  • @TKO67
    @TKO67 Рік тому +3

    would love to get a tour one day

  • @klassyedward9718
    @klassyedward9718 11 місяців тому +1

    Wow, Super aircraft.

  • @curtc4918
    @curtc4918 Рік тому +6

    22 billion for the engines? Don't think so.

  • @timvaldez6537
    @timvaldez6537 11 місяців тому +2

    Hey Nauctis, Why are you showing a photo of Gerald Ford and some reporter when you state immediately prior that Franklin D. Roosevelt was the first president to use Airforce one??? That makes no sense. You should have shown a photo of Roosevelt.

    • @MomolosZtips
      @MomolosZtips 5 місяців тому

      Only one of dozens of bad editing screwups.

  • @Gemini22-v4w
    @Gemini22-v4w Рік тому +1

    Now that is how the Prez is suppose to fly

  • @IndigenousAmericanTrucker
    @IndigenousAmericanTrucker 10 місяців тому +4

    Hmmmm! So, they are going backwards, I see! The current Air Force One can refuel in mid air, but the new one won't be able to. How much sense does that make? How would the President be able to stay in the air for extended periods of time during a global attack, if it can't refuel in mid air? That's one option that sets Air Force one apart from other world leader's planes! Yeah, good luck with that silly reduced option.

  • @carlthornton3076
    @carlthornton3076 6 днів тому

    Very Good!

  • @jackmeriustacktheritrix1114
    @jackmeriustacktheritrix1114 10 місяців тому +3

    Hypersonic 747 that would be some feat 😂😂😂😂

  • @Jaystarzgaming
    @Jaystarzgaming 11 місяців тому +1

    If stuff becomes reality no one has any right to refuse it’s existence.

  • @antonnym214
    @antonnym214 День тому +1

    Boeing loses money on every sale, but they make it up in volume.

  • @forestsantos9828
    @forestsantos9828 10 місяців тому

    Some of the Declassified info about the current AF1, it currently has mid air refueling capabilities, there are defensive capabilities (they won't disclose what those capabilities are, but it has some) and is nuclear strike proof. Also NO atmospheric aircraft has Mach 5 capabilities yet, even the SR71 has a record speed of Mach 3.4

  • @rbohun1
    @rbohun1 3 дні тому

    Air force One needs to be small with scram jets and full stealth tech. All it has to do is make it to Antarctica, where they have extensive support.

  • @johnrday2023
    @johnrday2023 20 днів тому

    With the 2 new advanced 'Air Force One' aircraft to be put into operation, what is to be done with the 2 old AF1 planes ???

  • @skentmar105
    @skentmar105 9 місяців тому +1

    $22 Billion for the engines alone???? How does that square with $5 Billion price-tag each for AF-1 and AF-2? Stopped watching at 4:58

  • @Dennis0824
    @Dennis0824 Рік тому +3

    OK, where is the Air Force One that flies at Mach 5??????? This is just click bait. Pathetic.

  • @jeremyreynolds1642
    @jeremyreynolds1642 2 місяці тому

    Perfect ❤

  • @Sauce-Money19
    @Sauce-Money19 11 місяців тому +1

    Gonna Need It😂

  • @butchs6099
    @butchs6099 11 місяців тому +11

    JRB needs a wheel chair ramp but at this stage of the game maybe just shove him out and before it lands.

    • @BobbyTucker
      @BobbyTucker 11 місяців тому

      ROTFLMAO!!! Go fer' it!

    • @perryfarmer3280
      @perryfarmer3280 8 місяців тому +2

      There is one bozo every day and today you are the one.

  • @orvjudd1383
    @orvjudd1383 Рік тому +2

    No 747 flying is capable of flying even close to Mach1 , this statement is BS

  • @marionwilson2521
    @marionwilson2521 7 місяців тому

    and he ate a hell of a lot better than America ate. with all of our work, for nothing he capitalizes and makes bank on and always has.. But thank you for supporting the industry. it is appreciated.

  • @jamesroe4968
    @jamesroe4968 11 місяців тому +1

    Make sure to brief Harrison Ford, you know, just in case.😂

  • @raymondharris900
    @raymondharris900 9 місяців тому

    How is possible for the engines to cost 22 billion dollars, meanwhile the estimated price of the entire aircraft could possibly cost approximately 5 billion dollars?

  • @timstewart9026
    @timstewart9026 9 місяців тому

    Given recent events, does Boeing guaranty the doors and wheels will stay on?

  • @CarlosSilva-ti5ib
    @CarlosSilva-ti5ib Рік тому +1

    I don't understand why these kind of fake stuff isn't simply banned by UA-cam.

  • @davedunn4285
    @davedunn4285 Рік тому +6

    I love how Donald Trump is updating the color scheme a reflection of JFK
    God Bless America

  • @ronniepowell3000
    @ronniepowell3000 9 місяців тому

    You showed a picture of Gerald R. Ford when talking about 1st president to fly on Air Force 1 was FDR.

  • @eliofernandez8448
    @eliofernandez8448 2 місяці тому

    Let us not make the same mistake we did in all previous Airforce One. But lacking the very most important defense System: The Missile launchers, visible guns and rear-view system, to
    watch who is behind you.

  • @felixniederhauser7799
    @felixniederhauser7799 9 місяців тому +1

    Shame on your fake headlines and bogus report. NB: Get lost. Amen & Amen

  • @rentechpad
    @rentechpad 11 місяців тому +7

    Truth is Biden went back to the old livery from the one Trump had ordered as Biden simply undid everything thst he could do that Trump had made a decision on. Hopefully, it's not too late for Trump to order it changed back after he is re-elected.

    • @chuckintexas
      @chuckintexas 11 місяців тому

      I hope he DROPS the whole THING and DEMANDS what he demanded before , that was FAR more CAPABLE . NO in air Refueling ?? _SERIOUSLY_ ?? This is way more than being about "Livery" or *PAINT SCHEME* . Biden is so STUPID it takes on elements of CONSCIOUS _EVIL_ .

    • @sharcrum
      @sharcrum 10 місяців тому

      I imagine that Nancy pelosi is the one that went screaming through the Whitehouse sayinG UNDO EVERY SINGLE THING THAT MAN EVER TOUCHED OR SIGNED OR HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH!!!!! HE REBUFFED MY SMILE SO HE IS OFFICIALLY SMITTEN FROM THIS EARTH!!!!!!

    • @denniss1044
      @denniss1044 9 місяців тому

      Trump can't change a damned thing from prison.

    • @sharcrum
      @sharcrum 9 місяців тому

      @@denniss1044 dream on.

  • @dalesaylors9251
    @dalesaylors9251 11 місяців тому

    The damn ring looks like a fighter jet.

  • @cindytaber7476
    @cindytaber7476 8 місяців тому +1

    WE WILL JUST VOTE TO CHANGE THE COLOR BACK THE WAY PRESIDENT TRUMP WANTS IT HECK WITH THEM DEMOCRATS BEING CHARGED ANYWAY IN 2024 OH YEAH OH YEAH

  • @themister3865
    @themister3865 9 місяців тому

    Why will not include the air-to-air refueling capability? I would think that function would be a given.

  • @topgunfurry
    @topgunfurry Рік тому +2

    I know later in the future there’s going to be a supersonic Air Force 1 because the future is coming!!!

    • @johnfranklin5277
      @johnfranklin5277 11 місяців тому

      Dont be so sure. I was 10 in 1969 when we put men on the moon. I remember thinking surly I would be abe to go in 20 or 30 more years......never happened.

  • @jimjohnson2190
    @jimjohnson2190 5 місяців тому

    I got to fly one time on a 747 across the Atlantic it was amazing I understand why it's called dreamliner

  • @waynewilson5700
    @waynewilson5700 3 місяці тому

    Several delays,that Secenario sounds familiar.the speaker sounds like he might have came from an actor contract company. 😮

  • @charlesjohnson4492
    @charlesjohnson4492 Рік тому +2

    Why take it down unless this is fake news as in other videos that are simulations from gameplay videos just so the video shows a false picture of a new military piece strictly for views.
    Is this real or made up for views only. Will there be no response as usual?

  • @B-rian937
    @B-rian937 Рік тому +5

    I would really like to see how the landing gear on the illustration works. 😂

  • @johnwoodall3791
    @johnwoodall3791 Рік тому

    Just when i thought i have seen everything.
    Nice Video.

  • @timvaldez6537
    @timvaldez6537 11 місяців тому

    The second time you mention President Eisenhower you show a photo from October 16, 1958 - First Lady Mamie Eisenhower and Pan Am Chairman Juan Trippe. The Boeing 707-121, the plane that inaugurated the commercial jet age for the United States with its flight from New York to Paris. President Eisenhower is not in the photo.

  • @RWGish
    @RWGish 8 місяців тому

    If they're wrong about the plane being able to fly at an impossible 3500+ mph then they're likely wrong about many other things, like airborne refueling.
    The new Air Force One may not even be a Boeing. I hear Airbus can build a jet that doesn't have pieces fall off at 20,000 ft.

  • @brentsummers7377
    @brentsummers7377 Рік тому +8

    OMG! If Biden had one of those planes he'd be taking 3 day weekends on the beaches of Italy and Greece instead of Delaware😂

  • @mikebergman1817
    @mikebergman1817 5 місяців тому

    That motor on the left sure is moving a lot.. @7:33

  • @joesmith1574
    @joesmith1574 19 годин тому

    The title says that the new Air Force one will fly faster than five times the speed of sound. The speed of sound is 767.3 miles per hour. If the new Air Force one flew five times faster, it would be traveling at 3835 miles per hour. Not even the SR71 reconnaissance jet can fly that fast. Its top speed was 2193 miles per hour.

  • @MrJ-dc3yz
    @MrJ-dc3yz 8 місяців тому

    Can't refuel? Will the doors stay on?

  • @user-rx561
    @user-rx561 8 місяців тому +2

    Trump gets this new AF1 in 24,go Trump ❤❤❤❤❤

    • @timriecken5453
      @timriecken5453 7 місяців тому

      Apparently u weren't listening lol. Said it wouldn't be ready until 2027 and trump will be in prison anyways 🤷‍♂️

  • @khukiyeyepthomi9977
    @khukiyeyepthomi9977 11 днів тому

    Long live America 🇺🇸🌍🐘🦄🦅🦁🐯👌💐✌👈👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍👍

  • @mikebergman1817
    @mikebergman1817 5 місяців тому

    DJT's private jet is so gangster.

  • @Homoprimatesapiens
    @Homoprimatesapiens Рік тому +1

    Is their provision for extra pilots and their comfort, or are the two pilots suppose to pilot the aircraft for days in a cramped space.

    • @2hcobda2
      @2hcobda2 Рік тому +1

      Autopilots from the movie "Airplane" earned their "Stripes" there.
      A 747 is shown crashing into the airport terminal near the end of
      the movie.

  • @rski1036
    @rski1036 3 місяці тому +1

    Air Force One designation is ANY airplane when the US President is onboard.

    • @michaelamack1767
      @michaelamack1767 2 місяці тому

      Not quite! If the President is flying in an aircraft from any branch of the military, then the call sign will be the service name One. Navy One was used when George Bush flew in a Lockheed S-3A Viking on and off of the USS Abraham Lincoln CVN-72.

  • @d.powers3428
    @d.powers3428 11 місяців тому +2

    Well, it definitely looks like something presidential. Or at least suitable for a dictator for a day.😅

  • @justinthomas2538
    @justinthomas2538 8 місяців тому +1

    Its RED WHITE and BLUE. In that order only. Thank you! USA!

  • @randolphgarcia3494
    @randolphgarcia3494 10 місяців тому +1

    BRIEF BLOG: AS OF 3/26/2024, THE NEW AF-One is still being built at a few AF Presidential sites, one of which is in Texas. It is said to debut in the Spring of 2027. Stay tuned. It'll be the new Boeing 747-8 VIP Air Force One.

  • @donaldboyer8182
    @donaldboyer8182 11 місяців тому

    What happens to them when they are replaced? Scrapped?

  • @bobnomura2068
    @bobnomura2068 11 місяців тому +2

    I stopped watching after hearing "turbine engine propellers" and 5X speed increase...

  • @metubyaj7675
    @metubyaj7675 Рік тому

    It is important to have intercept missiles with the air plane in case enemy launches missile to the plane.

  • @gtbproductions1
    @gtbproductions1 Рік тому +4

    $22 BILLION DOLLAR ENGINES???😂😂😂

    • @2hcobda2
      @2hcobda2 Рік тому

      But no $1K "turlet" seats, because gold plating costs more than that

  • @rapidcars1
    @rapidcars1 Рік тому +3

    The plane should reflect the colors of the flag. The blue should be darker like on the flag.

  • @research903
    @research903 Рік тому +4

    Click Bait...

  • @ImOnPoint
    @ImOnPoint 4 місяці тому

    I didn't get the memo, but we telling our kids that Roosevelt and Nixon were different people now?

  • @ernestyeagley512
    @ernestyeagley512 Рік тому +1

    Franklin D. Roosevelt the presenter says while showing a picture of Pres. Gerald Ford. That should give some validity and credibility to the rest of the video.

  • @safetychuck2
    @safetychuck2 10 місяців тому

    I bet it would be 5 times as expensive as any Air Force One before too.

  • @tahititoutou3802
    @tahititoutou3802 Рік тому +2

    I need not see the video to understand it is a hoax! If THAT structure is hypersonic, then the Ford model T is a race car!

  • @kimseymour8896
    @kimseymour8896 11 місяців тому +1

    No mid air refueling? What are they thinking ? That’s absolutely foolish ! They have to have refueling in flight. That’s a cover your butt maneuver !

  • @miztrusa
    @miztrusa 10 місяців тому

    There is no supersonic 747 but I do think Emerites is working on a supersonic A380.... That's what the leader of the free world should be in even if it's today's version.

  • @000pete9
    @000pete9 21 годину тому

    No aerial refuelling could be a weak point, why is this feature not required in this new Air Force One. Since every option is a must for the President's survival.?.

  • @MichaelMcKinnon-o6p
    @MichaelMcKinnon-o6p 24 дні тому

    Actually the first aircraft built for the US President was a C-82 Liberator Express named Guess Where II and I know that it was used to fly Franklin Delano Roosevelt at least a few times. The first aircraft to ever fly the US President white in office was a Pan American Airlines (commonly known as Pan Am) Boeing 314. SAM 26000 was used by Gerald Ford, Jimmy Carter and Ronald Reagan. Why no Aerial refueling, that's kinda stupid?

  • @davidgrisez
    @davidgrisez 14 годин тому

    The Boeing 747s that are in present day use and the ones being made for future use as Air Force One are highly specialized and highly customized aircraft for the primary use of transporting the president of the United States and designed to be a flying White House. So it is not surprising that these Boeing 747s are very expensive and no other aircraft is like these aircraft. I am sure there are various items about these aircraft that are classified top secret.

  • @PeterNGloor
    @PeterNGloor 11 місяців тому +1

    what a strange title???

  • @aLonelyT95
    @aLonelyT95 3 місяці тому

    The closest we have to a supersonic passenger jet is from Gulfstream, and even then it's not designed for it.

  • @pd4252
    @pd4252 4 місяці тому

    Another few hundred million for all the solid gold toilets.