REVEALED: INSIDE NEW AIR FORCE ONE That Flies at 5 Times Speed of Sound

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 22 сер 2024
  • Discover the groundbreaking advancements of the new Air Force One in our latest video! We delve deep into the remarkable transformation of the iconic presidential aircraft, Boeing's 747-8, showcasing its ultra-modern design, enhanced security features, and unprecedented speed capabilities.
    **𝗙𝗼𝗿 𝗤𝘂𝗲𝘀𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗷𝗲𝗰𝘁𝘀, 𝗖𝗼𝗹𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗼𝗿𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻𝘀, 𝗦𝗽𝗼𝗻𝘀𝗼𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽, 𝗔𝗱𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗼𝗿 𝗔𝗻𝘆𝘁𝗵𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗖𝗼𝗻𝘁𝗮𝗰𝘁 𝗺𝗲 𝘁𝗼:
    𝗡𝗮𝘂𝗰𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗬𝗧@𝗴𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗹.𝗰𝗼𝗺
    Nauctis is the ultimate hub for maritime, technology, transportation, and military enthusiasts.
    We release new videos every day on our UA-cam channel, Don't miss out on any of our updates - subscribe to our channel and Follow our Social Media to explore additional content.
    We request you to maintain a respectful and constructive tone in the comments section. Any spam, insults, or trolling will not be tolerated and will be promptly deleted. Join us on our journey to discover the wonders of the sea, Technology, Transportation and Military!

КОМЕНТАРІ • 465

  • @orlandocabrera2107
    @orlandocabrera2107 6 місяців тому +60

    Way too many inaccuracies in this video to count.

    • @wstowe747
      @wstowe747 5 місяців тому +4

      You are absolutely right.
      I have 31 years flying and another 5 years teaching it.
      Speed increased 5 times !?!
      Laughable…. how does this stuff get out there?

    • @user-vu9ry2fm2q
      @user-vu9ry2fm2q 3 місяці тому +3

      At 9 minutes, he is talking about FDR while showing a picture of Gerald Ford.

    • @larrybe2900
      @larrybe2900 3 місяці тому +2

      @@user-vu9ry2fm2q
      And couldn't find a photo of Nixon either.

  • @davidmccartney3433
    @davidmccartney3433 8 місяців тому +274

    NOT ONE WORD about a supersonic Airforce One. I really hate these UA-camrs that have grossly misleading titles.

    • @101bennyc
      @101bennyc 8 місяців тому +19

      So much click bait, I’m blocking this channel

    • @jefife750
      @jefife750 8 місяців тому +22

      I knew it when I saw the title. I scrolled it quickly and dumped it in less than 20 seconds. I hate this about UA-cam. Whats the purpose? This violates my community standards! BANNED!

    • @overlord5580
      @overlord5580 8 місяців тому +18

      False and misleading

    • @gtbproductions1
      @gtbproductions1 8 місяців тому +11

      THATS WHY I GAVE HIM A THUMBS DOWN 👎

    • @ME-bw3rl
      @ME-bw3rl 8 місяців тому

      grounds for murder

  • @jerrycallender-qm7zr
    @jerrycallender-qm7zr 5 місяців тому +22

    Mrs. Kennedy's color scheme is STILL an elegant design.

    • @itgoestoeleven
      @itgoestoeleven 3 місяці тому +1

      Mrs. Kennedy persueded her friend, Raymond Lowey, to design the livery for the Boeing 707 that was used to transport the president.

    • @jerrycallender-qm7zr
      @jerrycallender-qm7zr 3 місяці тому

      @@itgoestoeleven ...as mentioned above.

  • @zxatl2003
    @zxatl2003 8 місяців тому +42

    Do you proofread these videos before uploading them? I think NOT ! You said the engines would cost 22 Billion dollars ??? The total for both jets is suggested to possibly run up to $5 Billion. I think you meant to say 22 Million. You also said the jet would be able to go up to 5 times faster. The air frame of the 747 will not support that kind of speed. I am not a expert but for me to notice such glaring errors on your part is just ridiculous! Read your material before posting!

    • @amurtigress_mobile365
      @amurtigress_mobile365 6 місяців тому +3

      Not much, if any, technical research is done here in this channel. A supersonic jet would most likely need to be a delta wing or similar, who would seriously rip apart a 747 for that? That's almost as good as a newly developed aircraft....and then piece it together with previously untested new parts for something as demanding and challenging as a president's airplane? And all of that with a fuselage never meant for supersonic flight. GOOD JOKE....

    • @jeffscott6656
      @jeffscott6656 6 місяців тому +2

      The picture looks like a modified L1011

    • @timvaldez6537
      @timvaldez6537 5 місяців тому

      They don't even proof their historical photos.

    • @jasoncentore1830
      @jasoncentore1830 2 місяці тому

      The 74 can break the sound barrier but I will shudder and things start to break

    • @Darrell-su2hr
      @Darrell-su2hr 19 днів тому +1

      He called Ford, Nixon.

  • @michaelkoscec4113
    @michaelkoscec4113 6 місяців тому +40

    Totally agree regarding bogus headlines that have nothing to do with the actual content.

  • @dustinchase9187
    @dustinchase9187 8 місяців тому +39

    The title is a lie. Lies get thumbs down.

  • @davescott7669
    @davescott7669 7 місяців тому +21

    The plane is only "air force one" when the President is on board

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 6 місяців тому

      Yes and did you also know that there are not just two AF1’s? Speaking in terms of how they are outfitted technically yes, with all of the upgrades in security and updates in the interior layout there are only two planes manufactured and in perfect flying condition designated for the president’s use.
      Though any of the numerous airplanes that are in the Air Force’s flight arsenal have the call sign Air Force 1 when the president is on board.

  • @Cazador60140
    @Cazador60140 8 місяців тому +48

    A plane that size and structure could never fly at 5 times the speed of sound , even at high altitude it would simply diintegrate unless it only flies in Unicornalnd

    • @mikelee7318
      @mikelee7318 8 місяців тому +3

      What I was thinking. No way it can fly that fast.

    • @tscotom
      @tscotom 8 місяців тому +8

      clickbait !

    • @Eclipse-ss7ko
      @Eclipse-ss7ko 7 місяців тому

      I think that the narrator said 5 X the old plane. No inflight refueling is BS I do not know how the air force could allow that.

    • @trains4one
      @trains4one 7 місяців тому +2

      You want Mach 5, the aircraft would have to look like an oversized SR-71, Especially if your carrying the normal complement of people and extra news reporters that get to tag along.

    • @jaydee4009
      @jaydee4009 6 місяців тому +2

      I bet it won't even go 4 times the speed of sound!

  • @Wayne-gb5pu
    @Wayne-gb5pu 8 місяців тому +26

    My Man,, When You Say The Colors Of Our Flag,, Never Say,, WHITE RED BLUE... IT'S. """RED WHITE BLUE """...YOU GOT THAT...PAL!!!

    • @johnlicht9151
      @johnlicht9151 6 місяців тому +1

      Shifty Convict Clown 🤡 speech.

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 6 місяців тому +1

      Amen! Red is always on top!

    • @davidlauder-qi5zv
      @davidlauder-qi5zv 3 місяці тому

      And the colours of the British flag are also red, white and blue. You got that, pal?

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 3 місяці тому

      @@davidlauder-qi5zv 👏🏼

    • @davidlauder-qi5zv
      @davidlauder-qi5zv 3 місяці тому

      @@ebnolan3856 Meaning you didn't know?

  • @janetceniza8091
    @janetceniza8091 6 місяців тому +24

    My son is lead Engr. for Boeing out of Portland, Oregon and his group is working on one part of this huge plane.
    No info given to mom but still proud of his work.

    • @jeffscott6656
      @jeffscott6656 6 місяців тому +1

      😢

    • @LikeSpee
      @LikeSpee 6 місяців тому +1

      I hate to break this to you janet, but he's really a drug trafficker. Its hard to get out...

    • @paulfiore7083
      @paulfiore7083 6 місяців тому +1

      Please tell him to check the bolts

    • @janetceniza8091
      @janetceniza8091 6 місяців тому

      His job is quality control on the parts, works on the computer only as lead Engr. Only blisters on his finger tips.@@paulfiore7083

    • @brentbarnhart5827
      @brentbarnhart5827 6 місяців тому

      Congratulations Janet, that is quite something to be proud of. (I am an engineer, albeit, not an aircraft engineer.)

  • @michaelcolley1324
    @michaelcolley1324 7 місяців тому +22

    The new AF1 is only going to cost 5.3 billion dollars, but the generator upgrade is 22 billion. Don't you mean 22 million, and not billion?

    • @michaelloder5150
      @michaelloder5150 6 місяців тому +1

      Bunch of BS No Generator cost 22 million dollars .. maybe $200,000 at the most!! For a generator!!

    • @BobbyTucker
      @BobbyTucker 6 місяців тому

      The narrator stated the four engines cost 22 Billion dollars, I believe four jet engines for the aircraft can cost 22 million bucks, plus tips & gratuities...

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 6 місяців тому

      The narrator or the writer of the script for this video has embellished obviously. Though not by a whole lot. I believe that the script probably read close to 2 billion, not 22. Each VC 25 engine that GE will provide for the two new presidential aircraft’s are a cost of almost 325 million each. This would put the cost of the engines alone at 1.4 billion by today’s prices. If anything extra or improvements are required then this could push the cost very close to 2 billion.
      The balance of the cost for each aircraft, that will be manufactured to update and upgrade each to the specifications that are required to make it a presidential signified flying Oval Office, can be seen on the Boeing website.
      There are many technologies that are designed for these airplanes alone. So Boeing can not just take an already manufactured jet and upgrade it to meet the specifications for what is designated as a plane used by the president on a regular basis.
      It would cost much more to re-engineer a plane, by removing pretty much the guts of the previously manufactured aircraft. It takes a lot of classified, & patented technology as well as specialized components to be used in a military jet of this design.

  • @slobodanfemic4481
    @slobodanfemic4481 5 місяців тому +8

    B-747 beautiful plane ever !

  • @davedunn4285
    @davedunn4285 7 місяців тому +6

    I love how Donald Trump is updating the color scheme a reflection of JFK
    God Bless America

  • @exposingthedarknesswiththe9190
    @exposingthedarknesswiththe9190 6 місяців тому +31

    It's Unconscable not to have the ability to refuel in mid air! It's imperative to give Airforce One the ability to fly longer and further than any other private jet, it's simply common sense, and the ability to refuel as needed!!👍👍👍

    • @oldchuckie1874
      @oldchuckie1874 6 місяців тому +1

      The third AF one, the doomsday aircraft does have that feature. I’ve seen it at then Patrick AFB

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 6 місяців тому +2

      I worked at Boeing and it definitely can be refueled in flight! Why do you think that a refueling station flys in conjunction with AF1? Not only do they have these capabilities there is a cargo carrier that lands before the president does wherever he is going. It carries a limo, a Marine 1 copter, refueling stations for these additional transports, parts, mechanics, and other equipment and supplies. As well as multiple jets that fly at different compass points and varying altitudes from AF1.

    • @LikeSpee
      @LikeSpee 6 місяців тому +4

      Unconscable huh 🤔Did you make that up on the fly 😂

    • @BobbyTucker
      @BobbyTucker 6 місяців тому

      @@LikeSpee,
      You beat me to it, @LikeSpee, It's funny how some people when trying to use 2 dollar words, they only use 1 dollar and twenty five cents in letters. Thanks, B.T.

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 6 місяців тому +1

      @@BobbyTucker now guys, Apple’s spell correction can pick what word they want to use and the spelling at any time. I had an excellent English and Grammar teacher that was so good that I have to recheck everything I’ve typed before hitting send. All because Mrs Lowe tried to instill it in all of her students brains so that we wouldn’t sound like illiterate hillbillies. It certainly has stuck with me for well over 6 decades.

  • @marvinisit
    @marvinisit 8 місяців тому +19

    Just a simple FYI....lol Technically, “Air Force One” is used to designate any Air Force aircraft carrying the President.

    • @stuuuporman
      @stuuuporman 7 місяців тому +2

      at the moment

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 6 місяців тому +1

      You’re right! Any of the 300+ jets that the Air Force has can be a presidential plane when pressed to get him in the air and out of danger. Unless it’s a helicopter, then it’s Marine 1.

    • @BobbyTucker
      @BobbyTucker 6 місяців тому +1

      @@ebnolan3856,
      There is an SR-71 that can handle two human beings also.

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 6 місяців тому

      Thanks@@BobbyTucker. Wonder if there is talk of manufacturing one to a smaller scale that could work as a glider upon deployment then convert to a jet engine as an escape pod? I know it gets weirder as we talk about what’s possible.

  • @jaydee4009
    @jaydee4009 6 місяців тому +15

    Seems to me that when you're designing an improved (supposedly) Air Force One from the bottom up, you wouldn't leave out the air-to-air refueling feature, which seems like it could be a valuable feature to have when it might be needed. I mean, how hard could it have been to have included that capability in the initial design?

    • @charlescarmichael1124
      @charlescarmichael1124 6 місяців тому +1

      Apparently according to BETTER videos, it is pretty difficult to retrofit the 800's and they apparently have never used it. Even on 9/11.

    • @larrybe2900
      @larrybe2900 3 місяці тому

      @@charlescarmichael1124
      Perhaps but we never anticipated what happened that day either so what will happen next we never anticipated? We don't know what we don't know and to spend all this money leaving the president to a game of chance it stupid.

  • @mohammedali808
    @mohammedali808 8 місяців тому +11

    This is a very worrying situation where it CANNOT BE REFUELLED IN MID AIR. This a DOWNGRADE.

  • @gjurczyc
    @gjurczyc 8 місяців тому +12

    Great plane but as someone said already impossible to fly 5X the speed of sound.

    • @2hcobda2
      @2hcobda2 8 місяців тому +2

      Mach 5
      Hypersonic
      Faster than SR-71
      Fireball XL5 can attain Solar escape velocity with interstellar range --
      must be F.T.L., which means "Back to the Future" capability

  • @arleighj7053
    @arleighj7053 5 місяців тому +13

    You would think that refueling in the air would be a MUST in case of emergency

  • @carlmassey8837
    @carlmassey8837 6 місяців тому +7

    Just wondering if that elevator and wheelchair is meant for JB..

  • @CoolDave-tc7hb
    @CoolDave-tc7hb 3 місяці тому +3

    I like the new Air Force One is really Cool. 😎 I’m not sure 🤔 why nobody like the new Air Force One plane. It’s more like a presidential aircraft.

  • @stuuuporman
    @stuuuporman 7 місяців тому +10

    I like the current paint job. Looks Presidential, but understated. No need for red. However, I am wondering about no air to air refueling.

    • @ebnolan3856
      @ebnolan3856 6 місяців тому +1

      There is a need for red our flag is Red, White and Blue. Not white, blue and red. The red on the new plane is understated but very impressive. There is very little red color on the new planes. But like butt holes we all have our preferences.

  • @craigr.h.laurent240
    @craigr.h.laurent240 6 місяців тому +4

    Why is there background :music" in this video. It is especially annoying while the narrator speaks. No one needs to be "entertained" with that "music."

    • @MomolosZtips
      @MomolosZtips 18 днів тому

      Only one of dozens of bad editing screwups.

  • @IndigenousAmericanTrucker
    @IndigenousAmericanTrucker 5 місяців тому +2

    Hmmmm! So, they are going backwards, I see! The current Air Force One can refuel in mid air, but the new one won't be able to. How much sense does that make? How would the President be able to stay in the air for extended periods of time during a global attack, if it can't refuel in mid air? That's one option that sets Air Force one apart from other world leader's planes! Yeah, good luck with that silly reduced option.

  • @Dennis0824
    @Dennis0824 8 місяців тому +3

    OK, where is the Air Force One that flies at Mach 5??????? This is just click bait. Pathetic.

  • @bobnomura2068
    @bobnomura2068 6 місяців тому +2

    I stopped watching after hearing "turbine engine propellers" and 5X speed increase...

  • @curtc4918
    @curtc4918 8 місяців тому +6

    22 billion for the engines? Don't think so.

  • @jackmeriustacktheritrix1114
    @jackmeriustacktheritrix1114 5 місяців тому +3

    Hypersonic 747 that would be some feat 😂😂😂😂

  • @kyosanim9581
    @kyosanim9581 6 місяців тому +13

    AtA refueling seems very significant to omit!

  • @PedroG-xh6lh
    @PedroG-xh6lh 6 місяців тому +3

    I'm sorry Mr. But I still don't see supersonic mentioned anywhere in the advertisement of this video, maybe you should use your nomenclature better next time,..... I'm just saying 🙏🤟

  • @oxcart4172
    @oxcart4172 8 місяців тому +8

    Imagine the cost if they were new! Suppliers to the American government seem to get prices out their arses knowing that whatever they come up with, it'll be paid! (Much like the makers of this video with their "facts!"

  • @justinthomas2538
    @justinthomas2538 3 місяці тому +1

    Its RED WHITE and BLUE. In that order only. Thank you! USA!

  • @timothylaws4549
    @timothylaws4549 6 місяців тому +4

    inside looks like Star Trek

  • @butchs6099
    @butchs6099 6 місяців тому +11

    JRB needs a wheel chair ramp but at this stage of the game maybe just shove him out and before it lands.

    • @BobbyTucker
      @BobbyTucker 6 місяців тому

      ROTFLMAO!!! Go fer' it!

    • @perryfarmer3280
      @perryfarmer3280 3 місяці тому +2

      There is one bozo every day and today you are the one.

  • @rentechpad
    @rentechpad 6 місяців тому +7

    Truth is Biden went back to the old livery from the one Trump had ordered as Biden simply undid everything thst he could do that Trump had made a decision on. Hopefully, it's not too late for Trump to order it changed back after he is re-elected.

    • @chuckintexas
      @chuckintexas 5 місяців тому

      I hope he DROPS the whole THING and DEMANDS what he demanded before , that was FAR more CAPABLE . NO in air Refueling ?? _SERIOUSLY_ ?? This is way more than being about "Livery" or *PAINT SCHEME* . Biden is so STUPID it takes on elements of CONSCIOUS _EVIL_ .

    • @sharcrum
      @sharcrum 5 місяців тому

      I imagine that Nancy pelosi is the one that went screaming through the Whitehouse sayinG UNDO EVERY SINGLE THING THAT MAN EVER TOUCHED OR SIGNED OR HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH!!!!! HE REBUFFED MY SMILE SO HE IS OFFICIALLY SMITTEN FROM THIS EARTH!!!!!!

    • @denniss1044
      @denniss1044 4 місяці тому

      Trump can't change a damned thing from prison.

    • @sharcrum
      @sharcrum 4 місяці тому

      @@denniss1044 dream on.

  • @timvaldez6537
    @timvaldez6537 5 місяців тому +2

    Hey Nauctis, Why are you showing a photo of Gerald Ford and some reporter when you state immediately prior that Franklin D. Roosevelt was the first president to use Airforce one??? That makes no sense. You should have shown a photo of Roosevelt.

    • @MomolosZtips
      @MomolosZtips 18 днів тому

      Only one of dozens of bad editing screwups.

  • @gtbproductions1
    @gtbproductions1 8 місяців тому +4

    $22 BILLION DOLLAR ENGINES???😂😂😂

    • @2hcobda2
      @2hcobda2 8 місяців тому

      But no $1K "turlet" seats, because gold plating costs more than that

  • @fotoreporter.vienna
    @fotoreporter.vienna 7 днів тому

    The colours white, blue and silver are showing a cold athmosfere, it feels like a clinical disinfected room, in the opposite light brown, beige dark red etc. give the Audience a cosy and warm feeling. It's my opinion for the way of colours.

  • @kenlewis2353
    @kenlewis2353 8 місяців тому +5

    Crap title.

  • @jamesroe4968
    @jamesroe4968 5 місяців тому +1

    Make sure to brief Harrison Ford, you know, just in case.😂

  • @marionwilson2521
    @marionwilson2521 2 місяці тому

    and he ate a hell of a lot better than America ate. with all of our work, for nothing he capitalizes and makes bank on and always has.. But thank you for supporting the industry. it is appreciated.

  • @orvjudd1383
    @orvjudd1383 8 місяців тому +2

    No 747 flying is capable of flying even close to Mach1 , this statement is BS

  • @nobody6049
    @nobody6049 6 місяців тому +1

    Oh wait biden rides a train but its of it tracks 😂

  • @mikebergman1817
    @mikebergman1817 18 днів тому

    DJT's private jet is so gangster.

  • @brandonspaulding8097
    @brandonspaulding8097 3 місяці тому +1

    Everything on the internet is 100% true man! EVERYTHING! Even information about top secret airplanes man!

  • @jimjohnson2190
    @jimjohnson2190 18 днів тому

    I got to fly one time on a 747 across the Atlantic it was amazing I understand why it's called dreamliner

  • @klassyedward9718
    @klassyedward9718 6 місяців тому +1

    Wow, Super aircraft.

  • @TKO67
    @TKO67 7 місяців тому +3

    would love to get a tour one day

  • @Jaystarzgaming
    @Jaystarzgaming 6 місяців тому +1

    If stuff becomes reality no one has any right to refuse it’s existence.

  • @billsee476
    @billsee476 7 місяців тому +1

    what next? a plane that arrives before it left??? don't let facts get in the way of a fantasy story.

  • @research903
    @research903 8 місяців тому +4

    Click Bait...

  • @falconquest2068
    @falconquest2068 5 місяців тому +2

    Does this employ the anti-door fall off technology?

  • @brentsummers7377
    @brentsummers7377 8 місяців тому +8

    OMG! If Biden had one of those planes he'd be taking 3 day weekends on the beaches of Italy and Greece instead of Delaware😂

  • @mikebergman1817
    @mikebergman1817 18 днів тому

    That motor on the left sure is moving a lot.. @7:33

  • @Cam-SB
    @Cam-SB 2 місяці тому

    You said the engines would cost 22 BILLION dollars ... When the new AF1 originally should cost 3.9 BILLION. Boeing's setback is actually setting them in the red a billion dollars every year it's not out...

    • @MomolosZtips
      @MomolosZtips 18 днів тому

      Only one of dozens of bad editing screwups.

  • @cindytaber7476
    @cindytaber7476 3 місяці тому +1

    WE WILL JUST VOTE TO CHANGE THE COLOR BACK THE WAY PRESIDENT TRUMP WANTS IT HECK WITH THEM DEMOCRATS BEING CHARGED ANYWAY IN 2024 OH YEAH OH YEAH

  • @samuelrodriguez9673
    @samuelrodriguez9673 2 місяці тому

    love the new airplane for the presidential office and I love the old color scheme goes well with the plane

  • @Mullikia
    @Mullikia 6 місяців тому +1

    6:48 Hm, must be Biden's personal boarding chair.

  • @CarlosSilva-ti5ib
    @CarlosSilva-ti5ib 8 місяців тому +1

    I don't understand why these kind of fake stuff isn't simply banned by UA-cam.

  • @Gemini22-v4w
    @Gemini22-v4w 8 місяців тому +1

    Now that is how the Prez is suppose to fly

  • @RWGish
    @RWGish 3 місяці тому

    If they're wrong about the plane being able to fly at an impossible 3500+ mph then they're likely wrong about many other things, like airborne refueling.
    The new Air Force One may not even be a Boeing. I hear Airbus can build a jet that doesn't have pieces fall off at 20,000 ft.

  • @d.powers3428
    @d.powers3428 6 місяців тому +2

    Well, it definitely looks like something presidential. Or at least suitable for a dictator for a day.😅

  • @tahititoutou3802
    @tahititoutou3802 8 місяців тому +2

    I need not see the video to understand it is a hoax! If THAT structure is hypersonic, then the Ford model T is a race car!

  • @hermis2008
    @hermis2008 4 місяці тому

    I do not believe for a second the engines cost 22 billion dollars as stated in the video. That sounds ridiculous to me.

  • @kimseymour8896
    @kimseymour8896 6 місяців тому +1

    No mid air refueling? What are they thinking ? That’s absolutely foolish ! They have to have refueling in flight. That’s a cover your butt maneuver !

  • @Sauce-Money19
    @Sauce-Money19 6 місяців тому +1

    Gonna Need It😂

  • @anniegitare1676
    @anniegitare1676 2 місяці тому

    We love USA

  • @robertturner2876
    @robertturner2876 16 днів тому

    Shoot with all the problems that Boeing has been having, they should’ve went with AIRBUS to build the new AIR FORCE ONE AND TWO.

  • @GoHARD99
    @GoHARD99 2 місяці тому

    20 aircraft seats that can fly to New York to London in 90 minutes 😅😅😅😅 oh i forgot about the 20 billion dollar engines

  • @hildablanco1591
    @hildablanco1591 2 місяці тому

    The president should have a A380 for comfort

  • @michaelkeene588
    @michaelkeene588 7 місяців тому +1

    I thought, Boing sopped building thr 747! are You sure, the new Air Force One is even a 747 at all? I can see a 757, 767 or 777 as Air Force One maybe, but, not a 747 after they just quit building the 747! It's just not logical!

  • @raymondharris900
    @raymondharris900 3 місяці тому

    How is possible for the engines to cost 22 billion dollars, meanwhile the estimated price of the entire aircraft could possibly cost approximately 5 billion dollars?

  • @johnmcque4813
    @johnmcque4813 4 місяці тому +1

    THUMBS DOWN, a 747 can go 600+ mph pending on weather, you are saying 5 times faster? ""PFFT"" 3,000 mph, or 2500 knots. that is close to 3 x peed of sound, maybe 4 times. that plane would fall apart in that kind of wind drag.🤨🤔😐😒🙄😵‍💫

  • @qa4057
    @qa4057 2 місяці тому

    Hi. US Tax payer here. I vote for saving billions when it comes to carting a president and his entourage around the world.

  • @user-rx561
    @user-rx561 3 місяці тому +1

    Trump gets this new AF1 in 24,go Trump ❤❤❤❤❤

    • @timriecken5453
      @timriecken5453 2 місяці тому

      Apparently u weren't listening lol. Said it wouldn't be ready until 2027 and trump will be in prison anyways 🤷‍♂️

  • @PeterNGloor
    @PeterNGloor 5 місяців тому +1

    what a strange title???

  • @nickpage4333
    @nickpage4333 2 місяці тому

    Hope this Boeing doesnt have problems like others have had.

  • @dalesaylors9251
    @dalesaylors9251 6 місяців тому

    The damn ring looks like a fighter jet.

  • @B-rian937
    @B-rian937 8 місяців тому +5

    I would really like to see how the landing gear on the illustration works. 😂

  • @merrillalbury8214
    @merrillalbury8214 7 місяців тому +4

    Let's be honest. Biden went back to the old color scheme because Trump agreed to the new one of patriotic red, white and blue.

    • @stevengeorges9046
      @stevengeorges9046 7 місяців тому +1

      Let's be honest. Trump wanted the new color scheme to look like his private plane.

  • @eottoe2001
    @eottoe2001 8 місяців тому +2

    Oh yeah, supersonic and it will piloted by Bigfoot. Yeah, that's the ticket.

  • @safetychuck2
    @safetychuck2 4 місяці тому

    I bet it would be 5 times as expensive as any Air Force One before too.

  • @paulfiore7083
    @paulfiore7083 6 місяців тому +2

    Unbelievable. I thought we didn't want a King anymore? When it's not your money it's so easy to get extravagant

  • @dipaknadkarni62
    @dipaknadkarni62 2 місяці тому

    Cool.

  • @ronniepowell3000
    @ronniepowell3000 4 місяці тому

    You showed a picture of Gerald R. Ford when talking about 1st president to fly on Air Force 1 was FDR.

  • @chuckintexas
    @chuckintexas 5 місяців тому

    WHY would they NOT include refueling ? ADD the parts _pay_ for the certifications !! JEES . Who would ALLOW this ??

  • @topgunfurry
    @topgunfurry 8 місяців тому +2

    I know later in the future there’s going to be a supersonic Air Force 1 because the future is coming!!!

    • @johnfranklin5277
      @johnfranklin5277 6 місяців тому

      Dont be so sure. I was 10 in 1969 when we put men on the moon. I remember thinking surly I would be abe to go in 20 or 30 more years......never happened.

  • @bobbyaustin8478
    @bobbyaustin8478 12 днів тому

    Any plane with the president on board is air force one .

  • @user-pq2cr1cq6n
    @user-pq2cr1cq6n 2 місяці тому

    These kind of stories should be criminally investigated and prosecuted , it’s a big load of BS

  • @ernestyeagley512
    @ernestyeagley512 8 місяців тому +1

    Franklin D. Roosevelt the presenter says while showing a picture of Pres. Gerald Ford. That should give some validity and credibility to the rest of the video.

  • @miztrusa
    @miztrusa 5 місяців тому

    There is no supersonic 747 but I do think Emerites is working on a supersonic A380.... That's what the leader of the free world should be in even if it's today's version.

  • @forestsantos9828
    @forestsantos9828 5 місяців тому

    Some of the Declassified info about the current AF1, it currently has mid air refueling capabilities, there are defensive capabilities (they won't disclose what those capabilities are, but it has some) and is nuclear strike proof. Also NO atmospheric aircraft has Mach 5 capabilities yet, even the SR71 has a record speed of Mach 3.4

  • @randolphgarcia3494
    @randolphgarcia3494 5 місяців тому +1

    BRIEF BLOG: AS OF 3/26/2024, THE NEW AF-One is still being built at a few AF Presidential sites, one of which is in Texas. It is said to debut in the Spring of 2027. Stay tuned. It'll be the new Boeing 747-8 VIP Air Force One.

  • @randykling2889
    @randykling2889 4 місяці тому

    Just wanted say..
    The new Air Force 1..
    . Needs an elevator.... we don't want Joes next fall on steps to be his last trip.

  • @joec4871
    @joec4871 5 місяців тому

    He said "these engines cost twenty billion dollars". Shows they just post these videos without checking to see if they're accurate. Total garbage.

  • @MrJeepCanada
    @MrJeepCanada 5 місяців тому

    I hate click bate I wanted to see Air Force one look like the thumb nail lol

  • @bobbymaesteg
    @bobbymaesteg 3 місяці тому

    At least get the Presidential photographs correct. Richard Nixon and Eisenhower were completely wrong. A mess.

  • @charlesjohnson4492
    @charlesjohnson4492 8 місяців тому +2

    Why take it down unless this is fake news as in other videos that are simulations from gameplay videos just so the video shows a false picture of a new military piece strictly for views.
    Is this real or made up for views only. Will there be no response as usual?

  • @andytaylor1588
    @andytaylor1588 7 місяців тому +1

    turban engines eh? I'd prefer turbine engines, pronounced TERB-eye-n.

  • @rickrybacki4145
    @rickrybacki4145 2 місяці тому

    You must believe Donald Dump is king too