Shouldn't even be called spying, really. Cops are public governmental employees. Monitoring their activity while on duty is oversight, not spying. If they're working for us, we should know what they're doing. If we're not allowed to know what they're doing, who is? Please, hypothetical cop apologist in this statement, explain to me in detail who it is the police are working for and so who gets to keep an eye on their behavior. And then who gets to keep an eye on those people in turn. Say the hierarchy out loud, please. Into this phone camera I am holding.
i saw the radar detector and i was like wait aren't those illegal? unfortunately i've lived in virginia my whole life and thought they were banned everywhere :( people from WV and other states go out of their way to drive AROUND virginia on the way to the beach because they know our highway patrol are absolute assholes
In some places, on both hemispheres, there's laws or ordinances on the books prohibiting _specialised_ radar detectors. Prohibiting possession as such is pragmatically tricky, but the laws may be snuck into, say, traffic regulations, saying that it's illegal to possess one while driving, or inside a motor vehicle. A potential workaround might be to use a SDR system with the primary purpose of, say, serving as a police scanner, or listening in to air traffic conversations (a legal hobby that cops might feel less hostile about than listening in to cop-chat channels) but just as a side effect being capable of recognising traffic radar pings as well. Consulting a lawyer would likely be a good idea if there's some grey area wherever you are.
Good old boys in the Shenandoah Valley (the good kind of good old boys) have radar detectors you can install into your engine block, and can be turned off remotely the second it detects a radar signal. That's important because cops in Virginia have radar detector detectors. As long as you beat them on range and have a good reaction time, you can scoot on past.
There's a great UK based twitter account that RTs people directly asking various police forces if a given parking violation etc is illegal, then when they say yes, the person replies with a photo of a police car breaking that exact law
In the UK the police use an encrypted digital airwave system called TETRA. And it's now illegal to listen in, even if you found a way to access their comms. :(
You know what people do when everything's illegal? Illegal stuff. But at that point, what separates the defensive from the damaging crimes? I hope they're thinking ahead on their crusade. Well, not really. That'd mean we have less time to stop it.
Thank you so much, you are literally the only person I know who's pointed out that dashcams can be incrimination devices. To also add to the list, any kind of device your car insurance company wants you to put in your car should be avoided like the plague. (That phrase isn't aging well is it...)
That phrase is aging great. The plague SHOULD be avoided, which is why any sensible people are getting (and/or have gotten) the vaccine as able. Fittingly, the kind of people you should avoid like the plague, now have a high chance of actually literally having it.
Thank you so much for spreading this kind of information. Security is simultaneously the most important and least talked about information for anarchists.
I bought an over-priced police scanner at Walmart and I love it to death bc I’m a very curious person. You can use it to listen to Air Traffic Control, too! Some higher end scanners even allow you to listen to military comms. You can also listen to ham radios, which is usually just some guys shooting the shit in technical jargon, or you may get some random Morse code. I highly recommend getting a radio scanner to anyone who hates the police, loves aviation, or is generally nosey. Learning to understand what people are saying over radios is a good skill to have, too.
I read 1984 in school, all the students said it could never happen here. Watched The Net as a teenager, moviegoing public said it could never happen here. As an adult I've watched Drumpf's rise to power, China's social credit system, and ubiquitous surveillance; yet people are still saying "It could never happen here." 😢
You've grown into the hero we needed. Actionable advice in the face of an ever growing fascist presence. I loved your film analysis, and podcast, but you're doing the work now. Helping us prepare for the hellscape we're living in.
This channel is a great resource. Week after week, many of us are utilizing the tips included herein to gain a modicum of advantage over the systems that seek to keep us docile. Thank you for your continuing efforts ✊
I wish there was an app they let you set your phone to open to a safe partition with a specific finger print that locks out all other data without a password. Not a coder but seems simple enough and would be very useful for police and tsa/border cops.
I am 100% for people owning radar detectors. But I also think people should drive safely and within the speed limit. Use the detector to detect police, not to get away with speeding.
Speed limits don't keep you safe. Residential areas near me have 45-55 mph limits, and 4 lane stroads have 25--35 limits. Speed limits are completely arbitrary, a majority of road laws are. Following them doesn't make you safe, all it takes is one idiot who should have been riding a train or a bus (public transit is for commies tho, lol) to plow into you and send you and all your friends to the shadow realm when you were just going through a green light 5mph under the limit. Cars never have been and never will be safe.
@@erif1179 Tell me you don't understand probabilities without telling me you donät understand probabilities… Let me break it down: "safe" is not a binary, it's a scale, right? In one end there's 0% risk of an accident, at the other it's 100%. Now, in very few situations is anyone on either of these sides, but this does not mean that some actions you take won't decrease the risk or that other actions won't decrease the risk. The point of speed limits isn't to get the risk of an accident to 0%. it's to DECREASE the risk of accidents, which means fewer accidents actually happen. Making the roads, and traffic, SAFER. Than they were without those limits. "Lol but accidents still happens" is a very, very dumb argument.
@@erif1179 Additionally, higher speeds result in worse accidents when they do happen. I agree that more should be done to improve road safety such as narrowing lanes, putting up obstructions cars have to go around, tightening corners, installing raised intersections, and building better bike infrastructure and public transit. However, I would never shit on someone for urging people not to drive at reckless speeds.
@@krank23Speed limits still suck compared to actually changing road design to meet the desired speed on the road. Traffic calming always beats a sign that barely gets enforced properly.
On the last bit about securing your phone, if you use an iPhone and fully power it down, it will _not_ unlock with the user's face or fingerprint _unless_ the user first enters a password. Once the recording is done, shut the phone down completely to put it into a lock mode that can't be unlocked without your consent.
This is all well and good but as a (technically mixed but perceived as) black person, I'm shutting my mouth and doing what I'm told. I'll raise my complaints when I'm sure I'm not in danger.
This is me. My primary objective is to live. So I'm not gonna do anything that will give the police excuse to murder me. With that said I 💯 support what Leon is doing with these videos. The more white people rebel against the police in this type of way, the better for all of us.
One comment (about 9:50). The difference between fingerprints and passwords is more of a Fifth Amendment thing. Remember, the Fifth says you cannot be compelled to *testify* against yourself. There is surprisingly little caselaw on the question of biometrics (e.g. finger prints), but previous cases (including one by SCOTUS IIRC) have made a distinction between being compelled to turn over the code to safe (testifying) versus turning over the key (not testifying). The latter is not generally given Fifth Amendment protection.
In Washington State, USA, metadata from our State Police is public record; you can ask who the Federal Agencies have been asking about and when they asked, a little of what was returned (Many elements are redacted - but names, dates of birth and FBI Case Numbers are often intact. It can give names of others in an investigation, names of agents conducting that investigation, and of course dates when things began.
In the earlyish 2000s, my friends and I had an idea to buy radar jammers online and conceal them inside faux rocks with a solar cell on top. We'd then hide them off the side of the road near known police speed traps. Then set up a website where people could donate money for us to build and deploy more. Kinda similar to the "Adopt-a-Highway" program/signs.
An important point about lasers is, lasers have narrow beams in a way that even fairly directional radar systems don't. As a result, as long as the cop doesn't just randomly swing their laser around, it's possible to use a laser in a relatively 'private' way, in the sense that targeting a particular car in traffic can go undetected by other cars around. Radars signals inevitably disperse, and are as a result usually detectable by cars that were not particularly targeted. This is likely a major reasons why cops have been switching from radars to lasers.
For phone cameras you can create a shortcut. When I say "I’m being pulled over" it automatically starts recording and ppl I choose get a text message sent to them along with my location.
Thanks for the mention of 10 and 11 codes, a good reminder for a scene I'm writing where cyberpunk police respond to a something like a giant Festival robot being hacked by an extradimensional entity.
Not that it's legal but some people have been known to create at home jammers too. Capable of jamming police frequencies. One guy made one that jammed police, WiFi and cell phone signals to stop people from using their phones while driving and he put it in his car. He got caught because they ID'd the car using traffic cams and reported outage times. Just saying, it's been done before and it's easier than you think.
Regarding police scanners, there are also a ton of scanners you can listen to online for free. Being unable to afford your own hardware is not necessarily a barrier, although owning the scanner yourself makes it harder for the police to cut off access. Also, some departments have very simple analog two way radios you can listen into with a cheap UHF/VHF radio like a Baofeng. This is only true in fairly small departments though; most use what is called a "trunked" radio system where a central dispatch jumps the signal around to various frequencies to cram more independent conversations into the same frequency band.
I've never understood why people pay money for Ladar/Lidar detectors. The U.S. Navy spent some money to teach me about radar. I'm no expert but what I understand is Radar detectors work because while some other poor sap is being gunned your radar detector can pick up leakage(a side lobe) from the gun. But a w/ a laser there is probably minimal leakage so by the time your lidar/ladar detector picks up a return you're already being lased. I have to be wrong otherwise how could they get people to buy them? 🤔 a quick search proves my suspicion. Apparently laser jammers are a thing. 😉
Some states have a one-party consent law meaning you have to be involved in the incident somehow or getting consent to record with one of the parties . Secret recording in these cases is prohibited and could get you into trouble if you happen to do so.
This is mostly about situations where the recorded party has an expectation of privacy, such as on the phone or within a private residence. Courts (and the DoJ) have generally sided against the police when they try to assert a right to privacy in a public space while doing a public duty.
theres a bunch of good related stuff for further reading in the back of the 3rd ed. of _Our Enemies in Blue_ by Kristian Williams-I bet it can be found on the anarchist library. Also, _¡No Pasarán!_ edited by Shane Burley
You really shouldn't stand close to them even from the word "go". Don't even argue with them about it. Get back and stay back. If you bicker with them on camera, their supporters will feel vindindicated by anything that the cop does wrong in return. You need to be doing your level best to change the mind of tbeir supporters.. Stay back when you're recording
FYI: In Zermany, you know the Nation of the Pickelhaubes... it's a crime to film the police officers, if they tell you to stop filming them... a woman was stiked with a fine of 3600 € because she was filming the police arresting people during a demonstration.... On one occasion during a demonstration in 2021 a member of the police hit a Teenage Girls (Freitags Demos... Thunberg Activists) with the back of his Hand... because she was trying to raise her smartphone from her Pocket... a clear case of self-defence... (sarkasm). Kein Gott, kein Herr... peace out...
i have been trying to get training and learn about HAM Radio and eventually become a certified operator, but it's hard to find basics online because so much of it is done by right-wing nationalist doomsday prepper ghouls. we need some more anarcho sources for it! i think it'd go a long way for organizing! i plan to get in contact with my local HAM radio club in my town!
It really makes my stomach turn focusing my attention on anything to do with police because I involuntarily associate police and the probability of trauma occurring. So even though I binged nearly all of the videos from this channel I have to force myself to click on the ones involving police regardless of context. Here we go.
7:03 for this segment about having one in your car, I'd highly advise you to basically say that a UA-camr said it was a good idea for your safety, and don't come off as aggressive or "having a dick measuring contest" with the cop in question. Because they tend to be trained to expect the worst about other people's character, intentions, or past history if they see tools for evading law enforcement. So emphasising that you're just a symptom of a larger trend in public consciousness started by social media should solve that suspicion 😎👍🏼 I wouldn't normally offer such advice as someone in a cop family, but I know there is a far larger chance of some frequently racially profiled or harassed person reading these comments rather than someone with criminal Intent.
I don't know if this is still the case as I have not had social media in quite a while, but maybe about 5 years ago people would police dui/speed trap locations on facebook. Usually on the weekends.
If we don't hold them accountable snd act as watchdogs then we will continue on this path to becoming a fully-fledged police state. They already have too much power they don't need any more
And if they do nothing, you whine about that. Let me see how happy you are if one of your loved ones is killed, and they used their resources to catch the killer. The police grows along side the things that happen in society. And if you have nothing to hide....
On most Android phones, if you hold the power button for a few seconds, among the options like restart and power off you'll find the "Lockdown" option. This will instantly lock your phone and require your password/pattern -- even if you have a fingerprint or face unlock saved to the phone, Lockdown will require the password/pattern and will not accept biometrics. Invaluable if you're seconds away from losing possession of your phone.
on iPhone, opening the emergency sos call prompt will also disable biometrics for the next log in. The way to do this depends on what model your iPhone is so look it up to make sure you know how
If you do keep your fingerprint unlock on your phone, most phones will only allow for a pin number unlock if you restart the phone. As a last resort you can power cycle the phone to keep it locked behind a pin.
I have my phone set to "secure startup" so it's encrypted until you enter the passcode or password at startup. It doesn't even boot the phone without the passcode
100% of ALL phones ever made with a fingerprint sensor have a 'security mode' accessible by holding down the power key until the power off menu shows, which will disable the fingerprint until next passkey unlock.
@@jeffbrownstain Yeah i keep waiting for ppl railing against fingerprint unlock to mention this. admittedly you have to be able to reach and manipulate your phone but it literally takes 5 seconds. i cannot be arsed with a pw every single time i unlock my phone to read a message but i will set it to password mode when in a demo or similar situation
I feel that everyone should look directly and wave at every cop they see. There doesn’t need to be any motivation behind this other than observing our public servants and acknowledging this to them to ensure that it wasn’t coincidental. I’ve been doing this regularly for over a year now; but haven’t really put any thought to it until now. And I just realized that there’s no way this would ever come off as friendly or supportive from someone like me. The intent wasn’t to make them feel unsettled, but I’m pretty sure that’s what I was getting across this whole time. The interpretation is all on them however, so I’m going to keep this up as if it’s comforting
one of my coworkers flips them off whenever he sees them, which is protected under the first amendment. he got arrested for it a couple months ago and is in the process of suing them
Wasn't aware that some of these were widely legal, as I had been misinformed or lied to. Good to know
Werent we all.
Turns out lies are like the number one thing in police's toolkits. You know, aside from a monopoly on violence.
Shouldn't even be called spying, really. Cops are public governmental employees. Monitoring their activity while on duty is oversight, not spying. If they're working for us, we should know what they're doing. If we're not allowed to know what they're doing, who is? Please, hypothetical cop apologist in this statement, explain to me in detail who it is the police are working for and so who gets to keep an eye on their behavior. And then who gets to keep an eye on those people in turn. Say the hierarchy out loud, please. Into this phone camera I am holding.
Cops and political figures should have 24/7 live feeds of them at their places of work and when on business.
@@borger99And in the bathroom. If they have nothing to hide, they have nothing to worry about, right?
@@borger99They should not exist.
@@pivomanslovensko you keep fighting just like that. that's perfect and you're awesome.
Police body cams serve two purposes; aiding prosecution and providing content for Police cam channels.
i saw the radar detector and i was like wait aren't those illegal? unfortunately i've lived in virginia my whole life and thought they were banned everywhere :( people from WV and other states go out of their way to drive AROUND virginia on the way to the beach because they know our highway patrol are absolute assholes
In some places, on both hemispheres, there's laws or ordinances on the books prohibiting _specialised_ radar detectors. Prohibiting possession as such is pragmatically tricky, but the laws may be snuck into, say, traffic regulations, saying that it's illegal to possess one while driving, or inside a motor vehicle.
A potential workaround might be to use a SDR system with the primary purpose of, say, serving as a police scanner, or listening in to air traffic conversations (a legal hobby that cops might feel less hostile about than listening in to cop-chat channels) but just as a side effect being capable of recognising traffic radar pings as well. Consulting a lawyer would likely be a good idea if there's some grey area wherever you are.
Good old boys in the Shenandoah Valley (the good kind of good old boys) have radar detectors you can install into your engine block, and can be turned off remotely the second it detects a radar signal. That's important because cops in Virginia have radar detector detectors. As long as you beat them on range and have a good reaction time, you can scoot on past.
There's a great UK based twitter account that RTs people directly asking various police forces if a given parking violation etc is illegal, then when they say yes, the person replies with a photo of a police car breaking that exact law
sweet what's the link
There's nothing like waking up to some coffee and a new Renegade Cut video
Have you tried water and napping after a new Renegade Cut video? Also top notch.
Right?
Coffee? I prefer crystal meth.
Cocaine is perhaps a _little_ like coffee and there are other somewhat similar channels but yes.
In the UK the police use an encrypted digital airwave system called TETRA. And it's now illegal to listen in, even if you found a way to access their comms. :(
If the bobbies are doing nothing wrong, what do they have got to hide? 🤔
Fkn cvts. Acab
You know what people do when everything's illegal? Illegal stuff. But at that point, what separates the defensive from the damaging crimes?
I hope they're thinking ahead on their crusade. Well, not really. That'd mean we have less time to stop it.
Thank you so much, you are literally the only person I know who's pointed out that dashcams can be incrimination devices. To also add to the list, any kind of device your car insurance company wants you to put in your car should be avoided like the plague. (That phrase isn't aging well is it...)
That phrase is aging great. The plague SHOULD be avoided, which is why any sensible people are getting (and/or have gotten) the vaccine as able. Fittingly, the kind of people you should avoid like the plague, now have a high chance of actually literally having it.
Nowadays the phrase is closer to "deny it like the plague"
Thank you so much for spreading this kind of information. Security is simultaneously the most important and least talked about information for anarchists.
I bought an over-priced police scanner at Walmart and I love it to death bc I’m a very curious person. You can use it to listen to Air Traffic Control, too! Some higher end scanners even allow you to listen to military comms. You can also listen to ham radios, which is usually just some guys shooting the shit in technical jargon, or you may get some random Morse code. I highly recommend getting a radio scanner to anyone who hates the police, loves aviation, or is generally nosey. Learning to understand what people are saying over radios is a good skill to have, too.
Only YOU can stop the jackboot.
I read 1984 in school, all the students said it could never happen here. Watched The Net as a teenager, moviegoing public said it could never happen here. As an adult I've watched Drumpf's rise to power, China's social credit system, and ubiquitous surveillance; yet people are still saying "It could never happen here." 😢
Police the police
Dismantle the police and rebuild the system from the ground up.
Kill cops? Heard.
@hannahbrennan2131 what would you like built from the absence of the current policing
system.
But who will "police" me then? lmao.
Just to be clear, this is a joke.
Who watches the watchmen
You've grown into the hero we needed. Actionable advice in the face of an ever growing fascist presence. I loved your film analysis, and podcast, but you're doing the work now. Helping us prepare for the hellscape we're living in.
Dude. Your videos are always so good. Just enough commentary for context on why we should act, combined with lots of ways we can make change happen.
This channel is a great resource. Week after week, many of us are utilizing the tips included herein to gain a modicum of advantage over the systems that seek to keep us docile. Thank you for your continuing efforts ✊
I wish there was an app they let you set your phone to open to a safe partition with a specific finger print that locks out all other data without a password. Not a coder but seems simple enough and would be very useful for police and tsa/border cops.
How the turn tables…👀
*Cops:* _"Nothing to hide, nothing to fear"_ = Broke
*Civilians:* _"Nothing to hide, nothing to fear"_ = Woke
I am 100% for people owning radar detectors.
But I also think people should drive safely and within the speed limit. Use the detector to detect police, not to get away with speeding.
Speed limits don't keep you safe. Residential areas near me have 45-55 mph limits, and 4 lane stroads have 25--35 limits. Speed limits are completely arbitrary, a majority of road laws are. Following them doesn't make you safe, all it takes is one idiot who should have been riding a train or a bus (public transit is for commies tho, lol) to plow into you and send you and all your friends to the shadow realm when you were just going through a green light 5mph under the limit. Cars never have been and never will be safe.
@@erif1179regardless, I will do the speed limit. Anything to keep Uncle LEO out of my life.
@@erif1179 Tell me you don't understand probabilities without telling me you donät understand probabilities…
Let me break it down: "safe" is not a binary, it's a scale, right? In one end there's 0% risk of an accident, at the other it's 100%. Now, in very few situations is anyone on either of these sides, but this does not mean that some actions you take won't decrease the risk or that other actions won't decrease the risk.
The point of speed limits isn't to get the risk of an accident to 0%. it's to DECREASE the risk of accidents, which means fewer accidents actually happen. Making the roads, and traffic, SAFER. Than they were without those limits.
"Lol but accidents still happens" is a very, very dumb argument.
@@erif1179 Additionally, higher speeds result in worse accidents when they do happen. I agree that more should be done to improve road safety such as narrowing lanes, putting up obstructions cars have to go around, tightening corners, installing raised intersections, and building better bike infrastructure and public transit. However, I would never shit on someone for urging people not to drive at reckless speeds.
@@krank23Speed limits still suck compared to actually changing road design to meet the desired speed on the road. Traffic calming always beats a sign that barely gets enforced properly.
On the last bit about securing your phone, if you use an iPhone and fully power it down, it will _not_ unlock with the user's face or fingerprint _unless_ the user first enters a password. Once the recording is done, shut the phone down completely to put it into a lock mode that can't be unlocked without your consent.
This is all well and good but as a (technically mixed but perceived as) black person, I'm shutting my mouth and doing what I'm told. I'll raise my complaints when I'm sure I'm not in danger.
This is me. My primary objective is to live. So I'm not gonna do anything that will give the police excuse to murder me. With that said I 💯 support what Leon is doing with these videos. The more white people rebel against the police in this type of way, the better for all of us.
The Police in the area i live in also use code words for the Color of the individual involved in the incident.
One comment (about 9:50). The difference between fingerprints and passwords is more of a Fifth Amendment thing. Remember, the Fifth says you cannot be compelled to *testify* against yourself. There is surprisingly little caselaw on the question of biometrics (e.g. finger prints), but previous cases (including one by SCOTUS IIRC) have made a distinction between being compelled to turn over the code to safe (testifying) versus turning over the key (not testifying). The latter is not generally given Fifth Amendment protection.
In Washington State, USA, metadata from our State Police is public record; you can ask who the Federal Agencies have been asking about and when they asked, a little of what was returned (Many elements are redacted - but names, dates of birth and FBI Case Numbers are often intact. It can give names of others in an investigation, names of agents conducting that investigation, and of course dates when things began.
In the earlyish 2000s, my friends and I had an idea to buy radar jammers online and conceal them inside faux rocks with a solar cell on top. We'd then hide them off the side of the road near known police speed traps. Then set up a website where people could donate money for us to build and deploy more. Kinda similar to the "Adopt-a-Highway" program/signs.
Fuck yeah, here for this shit! 🚩🏴
An important point about lasers is, lasers have narrow beams in a way that even fairly directional radar systems don't. As a result, as long as the cop doesn't just randomly swing their laser around, it's possible to use a laser in a relatively 'private' way, in the sense that targeting a particular car in traffic can go undetected by other cars around. Radars signals inevitably disperse, and are as a result usually detectable by cars that were not particularly targeted.
This is likely a major reasons why cops have been switching from radars to lasers.
This is such an important topic! You provided really great information! An excellent video, as always!!
For phone cameras you can create a shortcut. When I say "I’m being pulled over" it automatically starts recording and ppl I choose get a text message sent to them along with my location.
Thanks for the mention of 10 and 11 codes, a good reminder for a scene I'm writing where cyberpunk police respond to a something like a giant Festival robot being hacked by an extradimensional entity.
Not that it's legal but some people have been known to create at home jammers too. Capable of jamming police frequencies. One guy made one that jammed police, WiFi and cell phone signals to stop people from using their phones while driving and he put it in his car. He got caught because they ID'd the car using traffic cams and reported outage times. Just saying, it's been done before and it's easier than you think.
In most contexts, broad-band jamming of public radio signals is a pretty antisocial thing to do.
@@rileyfaelan and carries a minimum fine of $10,000 from the FCC
@@janthran and is very easy to track down
Another fantastic video! I love every video on this channel, but they new direction it’s taking is incredible. Thank you, Leon.
Regarding police scanners, there are also a ton of scanners you can listen to online for free. Being unable to afford your own hardware is not necessarily a barrier, although owning the scanner yourself makes it harder for the police to cut off access.
Also, some departments have very simple analog two way radios you can listen into with a cheap UHF/VHF radio like a Baofeng. This is only true in fairly small departments though; most use what is called a "trunked" radio system where a central dispatch jumps the signal around to various frequencies to cram more independent conversations into the same frequency band.
To quote Lord Nikon "Snoop onto them as they snoop onto us"
Nikon and Cereal!
Great video as always!
I've never understood why people pay money for Ladar/Lidar detectors. The U.S. Navy spent some money to teach me about radar. I'm no expert but what I understand is Radar detectors work because while some other poor sap is being gunned your radar detector can pick up leakage(a side lobe) from the gun. But a w/ a laser there is probably minimal leakage so by the time your lidar/ladar detector picks up a return you're already being lased. I have to be wrong otherwise how could they get people to buy them? 🤔 a quick search proves my suspicion. Apparently laser jammers are a thing. 😉
Doing great work with these videos!
Some states have a one-party consent law meaning you have to be involved in the incident somehow or getting consent to record with one of the parties . Secret recording in these cases is prohibited and could get you into trouble if you happen to do so.
This is mostly about situations where the recorded party has an expectation of privacy, such as on the phone or within a private residence. Courts (and the DoJ) have generally sided against the police when they try to assert a right to privacy in a public space while doing a public duty.
over here in oregon they just got rid of that, everyone can now secretly record everyone! good job project veritas.
theres a bunch of good related stuff for further reading in the back of the 3rd ed. of _Our Enemies in Blue_ by Kristian Williams-I bet it can be found on the anarchist library. Also, _¡No Pasarán!_ edited by Shane Burley
These short tactics videos are very useful. Thank you for making them. Would you be willing to make a playlist of them as you make them?
Gotta quote Hackers: “Snoop onto them as they snoop onto us!”
An outstandingly informative video, I subscribed to your channel 👍
Commenting to drive engagment. This is A tier conent
Radar detectors are illegal in Manitoba. Make sure go google your area if you are outside the states!
ur channel is so precious thank u ❤
I have come to make obeisance to the algorithm gods.
May this content be viewed from the rivers to the ends of the earth.
Excellent one!
Keep on comrades:)
You really shouldn't stand close to them even from the word "go". Don't even argue with them about it. Get back and stay back. If you bicker with them on camera, their supporters will feel vindindicated by anything that the cop does wrong in return. You need to be doing your level best to change the mind of tbeir supporters.. Stay back when you're recording
great video. so much useful information that i was completely oblivious to
Scanners don't work in Norway any more, since they switched to digital and encrypted comms. I think much of the EEC is the same these days?
The panopticon is inevitable. Privacy is dead. The solution is *equal* lack of privacy. We should all know *everything*
i'd love a UK specific version of this video. if anybody ever makes it, and sees this comment, please send a link!
This is a must watch
Awesome ✊🏽
Renegade Cut is getting ready for what's coming.
Yaaaz
FYI: In Zermany, you know the Nation of the Pickelhaubes... it's a crime to film the police officers, if they tell you to stop filming them... a woman was stiked with a fine of 3600 € because she was filming the police arresting people during a demonstration.... On one occasion during a demonstration in 2021 a member of the police hit a Teenage Girls (Freitags Demos... Thunberg Activists) with the back of his Hand... because she was trying to raise her smartphone from her Pocket... a clear case of self-defence... (sarkasm). Kein Gott, kein Herr... peace out...
Great video
Illinois might be tricky when it comes to the video stuff.
Another useful vid! Thank you very much!
Plz what’s the intro song
How the tables have turned now huh
camera phones have been a gams changer. A career ender
✊
Sousvelliance ftw !
Triple click the lock button on your iPhone to disable touch/Face ID.
buena
i have been trying to get training and learn about HAM Radio and eventually become a certified operator, but it's hard to find basics online because so much of it is done by right-wing nationalist doomsday prepper ghouls. we need some more anarcho sources for it! i think it'd go a long way for organizing! i plan to get in contact with my local HAM radio club in my town!
🙏
There are also laser blockers that cost about a 100$
It really makes my stomach turn focusing my attention on anything to do with police because I involuntarily associate police and the probability of trauma occurring. So even though I binged nearly all of the videos from this channel I have to force myself to click on the ones involving police regardless of context. Here we go.
Police police
F is for First kids
7:03 for this segment about having one in your car, I'd highly advise you to basically say that a UA-camr said it was a good idea for your safety, and don't come off as aggressive or "having a dick measuring contest" with the cop in question. Because they tend to be trained to expect the worst about other people's character, intentions, or past history if they see tools for evading law enforcement. So emphasising that you're just a symptom of a larger trend in public consciousness started by social media should solve that suspicion 😎👍🏼
I wouldn't normally offer such advice as someone in a cop family, but I know there is a far larger chance of some frequently racially profiled or harassed person reading these comments rather than someone with criminal Intent.
Hell yes!
I don't know if this is still the case as I have not had social media in quite a while, but maybe about 5 years ago people would police dui/speed trap locations on facebook. Usually on the weekends.
If we don't hold them accountable snd act as watchdogs then we will continue on this path to becoming a fully-fledged police state. They already have too much power they don't need any more
I am able to break encrypted p25 because of weak keys and also because of known blank sections in audio that can be used for brute force attempts
180 dashcams are a good idea for your car.
but don't advertise it lol
Awesome channel! You are a godsend!
Brilliant
Thanks!
8 5hink this guy was a teacher, now he pretty well much turned into v for vendetta.
Quis custodiet ipsos custodes? Custodiamus ipsi custodes!
Not all of those 10-codes are applicable to every agency.
The hewbris of the watchman, to believe themselves unwatched.
UA-cam hides Renegade Cut harder than a Fabergé Easter Egg geez.
lol
cops are using digital trunking radios these days and you need to shell out hundreds of dollars for a compatible scanner unforunately.
🏳️⚧️
wonder if hasan is gunna watch this D: even still im here 1st kekw
You can always ask. Dunno.
And if they do nothing, you whine about that. Let me see how happy you are if one of your loved ones is killed, and they used their resources to catch the killer. The police grows along side the things that happen in society. And if you have nothing to hide....
How's that leather taste, bottom-feeder?
On most Android phones, if you hold the power button for a few seconds, among the options like restart and power off you'll find the "Lockdown" option. This will instantly lock your phone and require your password/pattern -- even if you have a fingerprint or face unlock saved to the phone, Lockdown will require the password/pattern and will not accept biometrics. Invaluable if you're seconds away from losing possession of your phone.
on iPhone, opening the emergency sos call prompt will also disable biometrics for the next log in. The way to do this depends on what model your iPhone is so look it up to make sure you know how
@@notNajimi Even easier, just use the "Hey Siri, whose phone is this?" prompt (i wish Android has similiar feature)
@@hanifarroisimukhlis5989would be nice if hey siri fucking worked on my phone, it never works for me
@@notNajimiI have an android phone but it seems I'll have to rely on your tip as I am seeing nothing but power off, restart, and SOS
If you do keep your fingerprint unlock on your phone, most phones will only allow for a pin number unlock if you restart the phone. As a last resort you can power cycle the phone to keep it locked behind a pin.
If your phone's battery is nearly running out, having a sufficiently lengthy consultation with a lawyer might be useful to bring that power cycle on.
Restarting your phone is a good idea even without fingerprint unlock. A phone that has not been unlocked since being off is generally more secure.
I have my phone set to "secure startup" so it's encrypted until you enter the passcode or password at startup. It doesn't even boot the phone without the passcode
100% of ALL phones ever made with a fingerprint sensor have a 'security mode' accessible by holding down the power key until the power off menu shows, which will disable the fingerprint until next passkey unlock.
@@jeffbrownstain Yeah i keep waiting for ppl railing against fingerprint unlock to mention this. admittedly you have to be able to reach and manipulate your phone but it literally takes 5 seconds. i cannot be arsed with a pw every single time i unlock my phone to read a message but i will set it to password mode when in a demo or similar situation
Somewhere in America, a police auditor shed a tear of joy
I feel that everyone should look directly and wave at every cop they see.
There doesn’t need to be any motivation behind this other than observing our public servants and acknowledging this to them to ensure that it wasn’t coincidental.
I’ve been doing this regularly for over a year now; but haven’t really put any thought to it until now.
And I just realized that there’s no way this would ever come off as friendly or supportive from someone like me.
The intent wasn’t to make them feel unsettled, but I’m pretty sure that’s what I was getting across this whole time.
The interpretation is all on them however, so I’m going to keep this up as if it’s comforting
one of my coworkers flips them off whenever he sees them, which is protected under the first amendment. he got arrested for it a couple months ago and is in the process of suing them
Always look forward to your videos . Keep up the great work.
Another Banger as always, Leon. Thank you so much for your videos!
Glad you like them!
The absolute DEFIANCE of putting their name at the end in big letters.
WHO DID THIS?
*I DID THIS*