@computerpro123abc 0 seconds ago VERY BAD JUDGE: THE LIMIT WAS 30 CENTS A POUND!!! SO THEY SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN 30LB X .30 =$9!!!! BUT!!!!!!! MOVER PERPETRATED A FRAUD, HE WROTE THE DAMAGE LIMIT SO IT WAS NOT READABLE!!! WITHOUT MILIAN USING A MAGNAFYING GLASS!!!!! MILIAN KNOWS BETTER!!! ALL TERMS AND WRITTING ON CONSUMER CONTRACTS MUST BE READABLE WITHOUT USING A MAGNIFYING GLASS!!! MILYAN SHOULD HAVE VOIDED THE DAMAGE LIMIT OF $9 AND AWARDED THE COST OF REPAIR $500. SHE IS A REALLY BAD JUDGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
She’s out of his league, so, he worships the ground she walks on. She’s a “musician” so, she needs his moolah. That’s the relationship. Trust me. I lived it. He will hit a wall.
She told on herself at the end. She said the TV was broken AFTER the move. If they thought the movers broke the TV, she would have said it was broken DURING the move.
@computerpro123abc 0 seconds ago VERY BAD JUDGE: THE LIMIT WAS 30 CENTS A POUND!!! SO THEY SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN 30LB X .30 =$9!!!! BUT!!!!!!! MOVER PERPETRATED A FRAUD, HE WROTE THE DAMAGE LIMIT SO IT WAS NOT READABLE!!! WITHOUT MILIAN USING A MAGNAFYING GLASS!!!!! MILIAN KNOWS BETTER!!! ALL TERMS AND WRITTING ON CONSUMER CONTRACTS MUST BE READABLE WITHOUT USING A MAGNIFYING GLASS!!! MILYAN SHOULD HAVE VOIDED THE DAMAGE LIMIT OF $9 AND AWARDED THE COST OF REPAIR $500. SHE IS A REALLY BAD JUDGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@computerpro123abc 0 seconds ago VERY BAD JUDGE: THE LIMIT WAS 30 CENTS A POUND!!! SO THEY SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN 30LB X .30 =$9!!!! BUT!!!!!!! MOVER PERPETRATED A FRAUD, HE WROTE THE DAMAGE LIMIT SO IT WAS NOT READABLE!!! WITHOUT MILIAN USING A MAGNAFYING GLASS!!!!! MILIAN KNOWS BETTER!!! ALL TERMS AND WRITTING ON CONSUMER CONTRACTS MUST BE READABLE WITHOUT USING A MAGNIFYING GLASS!!! MILYAN SHOULD HAVE VOIDED THE DAMAGE LIMIT OF $9 AND AWARDED THE COST OF REPAIR $500. SHE IS A REALLY BAD JUDGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Interesting, she said the tv was broken AFTER the move, shouldn't it have been during the move? In the after-interview portion. I think she told on herself!
her leaning down all the time to talk on the mike, oh my listen to Douglas lol and her grinding voice like she is all that and a bag of chips haha her mouth going full open saying um at the interview lol
@computerpro123abc 0 seconds ago VERY BAD JUDGE: THE LIMIT WAS 30 CENTS A POUND!!! SO THEY SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN 30LB X .30 =$9!!!! BUT!!!!!!! MOVER PERPETRATED A FRAUD, HE WROTE THE DAMAGE LIMIT SO IT WAS NOT READABLE!!! WITHOUT MILIAN USING A MAGNAFYING GLASS!!!!! MILIAN KNOWS BETTER!!! ALL TERMS AND WRITTING ON CONSUMER CONTRACTS MUST BE READABLE WITHOUT USING A MAGNIFYING GLASS!!! MILYAN SHOULD HAVE VOIDED THE DAMAGE LIMIT OF $9 AND AWARDED THE COST OF REPAIR $500. SHE IS A REALLY BAD JUDGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
@computerpro123abc 0 seconds ago VERY BAD JUDGE: THE LIMIT WAS 30 CENTS A POUND!!! SO THEY SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN 30LB X .30 =$9!!!! BUT!!!!!!! MOVER PERPETRATED A FRAUD, HE WROTE THE DAMAGE LIMIT SO IT WAS NOT READABLE!!! WITHOUT MILIAN USING A MAGNAFYING GLASS!!!!! MILIAN KNOWS BETTER!!! ALL TERMS AND WRITTING ON CONSUMER CONTRACTS MUST BE READABLE WITHOUT USING A MAGNIFYING GLASS!!! MILYAN SHOULD HAVE VOIDED THE DAMAGE LIMIT OF $9 AND AWARDED THE COST OF REPAIR $500. SHE IS A REALLY BAD JUDGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You do know the louder you speak the more the judge believes you. In this case the plaintiff girl sounded like my daughter when she was a kid blaming something on her brother when I already knew the truth. Her dramatics got her no where.
thats the most LOGICAL reason. Plus they had 5 tvs and pretty sure if they ;ove tvs that much they would wrap them well. The broken TV was dropped or fell over on transport.
The plaintiffs' line about not knowing what renter's insurance covers isn't believable at their age. And lol, the female plaintiff should go into acting, not music.
I had to turn the volume down on the plaintiff's girlfriend (or excuse me "associate" she's a recording artist -- a very shrill and loud like nails on a chalkboard shrill). She would apologize and then move closer then closer then closer to the microphone. And her voice is very piercing and shrill and way too loud.
Horrible outcome JM. The fact the defendants blatantly lied about their interactions with requesting only 1 tv to be unpacked and not all five and the managers testimony. I defy would have believed for the plaintiffs over the defendant
We use movers everytime we move and they absolutely ask to see certain items that have been pre packed to make sure nothing is broken before it goes into the truck.
She said "a lot of people dont know the rules of renters insurance" so you didn't read the documents you signed when getting renters insurance?? If im spending money on INSURANCE you best believe im reading exactly what is covered by said insurance as im sure majority of people would do, what scam artists i swear.
Broken AFTER the move..."A lot of people don't know the rules of renter's insurance and they don't really know how insurance works, so we thought that would work". Claims in the courtroom she had no idea about renter's insurance. Just who did she think they'd get one over on? JM, the insurance company? He really didnt need to bring her if he wanted to win, she lost the case for him with her big mouth. Her 15 minutes and cut!
You could easily discern that the female plantiff was excessively striving to sow confusion and disorder in order to appear more credible, but this tactic failed when she attempted to feign ignorance and employ the stereotypical "dumb blonde" approach by pretending to be clueless about insurance matters. 🤔The plaintiff hesitated to contact the moving company because they had been exceptionally pleasant, which seemed like a valid reason for not immediately reaching out to them upon discovering that her TV was damaged. 🤥While this reasoning may not be logical, it is still discernible. She is the type of individual who understands her partner well, so she eagerly intervened in an attempt to sway the judge into believing the fabricated tale. 🙄Fortunately, the judge astutely saw through the deception from a psychological perspective and recognized that she was being manipulated, especially given the lack of evidence from the plaintiffs. The defendant appeared more sincere rather naturally.
I don't see whats so ridiculous about calling renters insurance. The people commenting on here souud like home owners who have no clue how renters insurance works. I have had renters insurance for over 20 years now. They tell you to call them first usually if there is an issue with movers and/or moving. I think the plaintiff did the right thing. The Judge is out of touch with having renters insurance and also people compleatly understanding everything with insurance. I think the plaintiffs should have won.
I would have wanted to see the tvs before I load them it just looks like they were hiding something on one of the tv because that one was broken and plaintiff voice was so annoying
I actually believe the plaintiffs. I believe the movers accidently damaged the TV. I believe the plaintiffs (mainly the woman) is younger and doesn't know how renters insurance works. She thought they could cover it and when it was denied decided to go after the moving company. People don't always have an ulterior motive. Sometimes, they just are ignorant and simply don't know. But just my take on the case.
I dont think there was anything wrong with asking renters insurance to pay. I dont think that implies sneaky guilt. I think that judge was wrong again!
Judge Milan was rude you don't entertain and asked the female plaintiff a question and two than automatically go over the other side and switch back as if she the lady wasn't in the mist of speaking to the issue. smh and to each there own some will like her and others the manager for the moving company why confuse passion for annoying she is herself nobody else and likes things done a certain vs out of whack and everything should be talked about, understand and documented before moving anything from the home is my advise for the defendants in this case despite the win
She yelled at a detailer for doing the same thing, but he wasn't yelling. She felt he was making her nervous. She told him to sit down. Oh, how she treats people differently!!!
She was stressing me out!
Me too
same, her voice was naturally annoying!
The female plaintiff thought she was in a murder trial, not a case about a damaged tv 😂
😂
thank you. i was going to ask if THAT was supposed to be male or female. people have no shame anymore
Holy cow, NO SHIT!
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Right she needs to relax
Im not even half way in and I think the movers should win because that woman is so annoying.
@computerpro123abc
0 seconds ago
VERY BAD JUDGE: THE LIMIT WAS 30 CENTS A POUND!!! SO THEY SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN 30LB X .30 =$9!!!! BUT!!!!!!! MOVER PERPETRATED A FRAUD, HE WROTE THE DAMAGE LIMIT SO IT WAS NOT READABLE!!! WITHOUT MILIAN USING A MAGNAFYING GLASS!!!!! MILIAN KNOWS BETTER!!! ALL TERMS AND WRITTING ON CONSUMER CONTRACTS MUST BE READABLE WITHOUT USING A MAGNIFYING GLASS!!!
MILYAN SHOULD HAVE VOIDED THE DAMAGE LIMIT OF $9 AND AWARDED THE COST
OF REPAIR $500. SHE IS A REALLY BAD JUDGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
THE MOVERS "INSURANCE" IS ILLEGAL: THEY ARE NOT AN INSURANCE CO!!
MILIAN SHOULD KNOW THAT!!!
Dramatic, unreasonably so.
I agree. At the end she says the damage happened after the move 😂
Lies tend to be shouted for effectiveness and overriding your brains honesty .... Some time
THE MOVERS "INSURANCE" IS ILLEGAL: THEY ARE NOT AN INSURANCE CO!!
MILIAN SHOULD KNOW THAT!!!
I know which one had a strong Espresso
Methpretho, perhaps?
😂
Skiing ⛷️ ❄️
😂
Y'all are frickin HILARIOUS! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Next time leave the girlfriend at home she did more damage than help you
THE MOVERS "INSURANCE" IS ILLEGAL: THEY ARE NOT AN INSURANCE CO!!
MILIAN SHOULD KNOW THAT!!!
Poor dude, I don't know how anyone could handle her more than 2 mins, geez😳🙄
She’s out of his league, so, he worships the ground she walks on. She’s a “musician” so, she needs his moolah. That’s the relationship. Trust me. I lived it. He will hit a wall.
Well he picked her so I’m assuming her likes her
Sounds like english is his second language
@@HHH-ye1rolol at out of her league. Leagues dont exist. Well maybe for beta males they do.
@@HHH-ye1ro stop projecting
This girl needs to calm down.. OMG: she's torture.
She told on herself at the end. She said the TV was broken AFTER the move. If they thought the movers broke the TV, she would have said it was broken DURING the move.
@computerpro123abc
0 seconds ago
VERY BAD JUDGE: THE LIMIT WAS 30 CENTS A POUND!!! SO THEY SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN 30LB X .30 =$9!!!! BUT!!!!!!! MOVER PERPETRATED A FRAUD, HE WROTE THE DAMAGE LIMIT SO IT WAS NOT READABLE!!! WITHOUT MILIAN USING A MAGNAFYING GLASS!!!!! MILIAN KNOWS BETTER!!! ALL TERMS AND WRITTING ON CONSUMER CONTRACTS MUST BE READABLE WITHOUT USING A MAGNIFYING GLASS!!!
MILYAN SHOULD HAVE VOIDED THE DAMAGE LIMIT OF $9 AND AWARDED THE COST
OF REPAIR $500. SHE IS A REALLY BAD JUDGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Why the heck would I call my homeowner’s insurance and get a ding on my stellar record if a mover broke my tv?? Get outta here 😂
@computerpro123abc
0 seconds ago
VERY BAD JUDGE: THE LIMIT WAS 30 CENTS A POUND!!! SO THEY SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN 30LB X .30 =$9!!!! BUT!!!!!!! MOVER PERPETRATED A FRAUD, HE WROTE THE DAMAGE LIMIT SO IT WAS NOT READABLE!!! WITHOUT MILIAN USING A MAGNAFYING GLASS!!!!! MILIAN KNOWS BETTER!!! ALL TERMS AND WRITTING ON CONSUMER CONTRACTS MUST BE READABLE WITHOUT USING A MAGNIFYING GLASS!!!
MILYAN SHOULD HAVE VOIDED THE DAMAGE LIMIT OF $9 AND AWARDED THE COST
OF REPAIR $500. SHE IS A REALLY BAD JUDGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
My ears are ringing!! I absolutely cannot finish watching this one!
What the hell why is she leaning over and yelling that’s so annoying lol I hope I can stand it enough to see the ending lol
😂😅
😂😅
😅🤣
😂😂
Jeebuz Cripes, this lady is if ALL CAPS was a person LMAO
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
The TV was broken after the move she said it herself😊
exactly that is what she said in the hallway with Curt 😄 (she told on herself)
Very emotional is an understatement.
I have never seen a plaintiff so obnoxious in all these cases! What’s wrong with her??
The plaintiff needs to lay off the Bolivian caffeine! 😵💫
😂😂😂 Colombian Marching Powder lol
Aw, hell, I can't stop laughing at the volume of comments about Old Yeller. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@michelehemlokhexwhite4310 😂
@@bhornannawindeedeigh5007 lol yeller 🤪🤣
I had to turn the volume down on my phone.
Me too.
Me three
Your honor I was literally born yesterday and I didn't know what insurance meant. I'm an artist. 🤣
a VERY loud....VERY obnoxious artist....and no too bight
JM: who are you?
Dude: Huh?
🤦🏻
Was this girl skiing before the court 💀😂🥴
I moved from Fl to Md and was told by my renters insurance that they DO cover a move.
OMGod, tell her to SHUT UP!!
Is the plaintiff ok 😂
Interesting, she said the tv was broken AFTER the move, shouldn't it have been during the move? In the after-interview portion. I think she told on herself!
That was her downfall she couldn’t kept the lies straight
She needs to stop being a singer and be an actress cause she is very dramatic
her leaning down all the time to talk on the mike, oh my listen to Douglas lol and her grinding voice like she is all that and a bag of chips haha her mouth going full open saying um at the interview lol
Movers do not cover electronics unless they see it work and if the movers don't pack it.
@computerpro123abc
0 seconds ago
VERY BAD JUDGE: THE LIMIT WAS 30 CENTS A POUND!!! SO THEY SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN 30LB X .30 =$9!!!! BUT!!!!!!! MOVER PERPETRATED A FRAUD, HE WROTE THE DAMAGE LIMIT SO IT WAS NOT READABLE!!! WITHOUT MILIAN USING A MAGNAFYING GLASS!!!!! MILIAN KNOWS BETTER!!! ALL TERMS AND WRITTING ON CONSUMER CONTRACTS MUST BE READABLE WITHOUT USING A MAGNIFYING GLASS!!!
MILYAN SHOULD HAVE VOIDED THE DAMAGE LIMIT OF $9 AND AWARDED THE COST
OF REPAIR $500. SHE IS A REALLY BAD JUDGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"Mo, Curly and Larry"
- bit harsh 🤣
“Don’t yell at me, I’m right here” 😂😂😂😂😂
I read this as she was saying it lol 5:59
The famale plaintiff is extremely irritating and is just TOO much!
the way she talks ugh
Very interesting case. Greetings from Uganda
Hello from the Cascade mountains in Washington state,USA..may your life be blessed and your loved ones too
The plaintiff was talking loud and saying nothing. A 7 yr old would know what renters insurance is for.
NOT TRUE, YOU CAN BUY "ALL RISK" INSURANCE" IF YOU PAY MORE.
The look on the plaintiff's faces when they realized their lie about the renters insurance didn’t fly.
@computerpro123abc
0 seconds ago
VERY BAD JUDGE: THE LIMIT WAS 30 CENTS A POUND!!! SO THEY SHOULD HAVE GOTTEN 30LB X .30 =$9!!!! BUT!!!!!!! MOVER PERPETRATED A FRAUD, HE WROTE THE DAMAGE LIMIT SO IT WAS NOT READABLE!!! WITHOUT MILIAN USING A MAGNAFYING GLASS!!!!! MILIAN KNOWS BETTER!!! ALL TERMS AND WRITTING ON CONSUMER CONTRACTS MUST BE READABLE WITHOUT USING A MAGNIFYING GLASS!!!
MILYAN SHOULD HAVE VOIDED THE DAMAGE LIMIT OF $9 AND AWARDED THE COST
OF REPAIR $500. SHE IS A REALLY BAD JUDGE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
You do know the louder you speak the more the judge believes you. In this case the plaintiff girl sounded like my daughter when she was a kid blaming something on her brother when I already knew the truth. Her dramatics got her no where.
Nice passive aggressive try!
Judge, don't forget Shemp.
First, she was very convincing. when she said he wasn't there. and then goes. "oh yeah he was there with a hat on" Liar.
She wasn't going to get no real money for the TV anywhere $0.30 per pound
Easy read your renters policy if you want to know how it works 😂.
lol - JM finally has a litigant that matches her personality.
I think the name should have been uptown guy 🤷
Putting the cart before the horse as the judge said.
Omg can she stop yelling
Yellalot and Ceasar
😅😂🤣
Sonuvab****! 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Why are we shouting 🤣
They broke it that’s why they asked to look at it
Now that i can believe
thats the most LOGICAL reason. Plus they had 5 tvs and pretty sure if they ;ove tvs that much they would wrap them well. The broken TV was dropped or fell over on transport.
The judge saying don't yell im right here is hysterical!!
The Plaintiff, the tv broke, the end...giggle
Is This Microphone On??!?!🤣😂
The plaintiffs' line about not knowing what renter's insurance covers isn't believable at their age. And lol, the female plaintiff should go into acting, not music.
I had to turn the volume down on the plaintiff's girlfriend (or excuse me "associate" she's a recording artist -- a very shrill and loud like nails on a chalkboard shrill). She would apologize and then move closer then closer then closer to the microphone. And her voice is very piercing and shrill and way too loud.
Omg her attention to emphasis is overbearing 😂😂😂😂 so annoying
Horrible outcome JM. The fact the defendants blatantly lied about their interactions with requesting only 1 tv to be unpacked and not all five and the managers testimony. I defy would have believed for the plaintiffs over the defendant
JM just didn't see it the fine print but it was big enough lol and the plaintiff gf needs to take a chill pill. Fair judgement
Why are you still wearing a mask?
Bc i can. Mind your own business
Please stop talking lady my ears are starting to bleed, I wonder where she thought she was at a audition 🤨🤨🤨🤨
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 that lady plaintiff - 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
they would have signed paperwork from the movers that say they don't cover the electronics
As soon as he walked in I just wanted to say "Say hello to my lil friend"
Why not look at the details on the denied insurance claim. Surely they would have had to say how the TV broke when asking for them to cover it.
The plaintiffs voice and high strung attitude is stressing me. I could never be around her for any amount of time.
She, the plaintiff, is so full of it ! Lol😅
What if SHE refused to move that flat screen ? I would have refused to touch that thing.
The plaintiff is going to lose because of that girlfriend that doesn't know when to shut up
We use movers everytime we move and they absolutely ask to see certain items that have been pre packed to make sure nothing is broken before it goes into the truck.
And I’m the Fifth Element 🤓
Lady plaintiff def had a large coffee before walking in the courtroom 😳
Just because JM doesn't think it's a normal thing to do(to check a pre-wrapped TV) doesn't mean it didn't happen. 12:54
No it is not clear. But it is very likely and clear that the tv had been broken before moving or right after.
Defendant got that perma people's eyebrow... if you smell what I'm cookin
She said "a lot of people dont know the rules of renters insurance" so you didn't read the documents you signed when getting renters insurance?? If im spending money on INSURANCE you best believe im reading exactly what is covered by said insurance as im sure majority of people would do, what scam artists i swear.
That's why they bubbled wrapped it
Broken AFTER the move..."A lot of people don't know the rules of renter's insurance and they don't really know how insurance works, so we thought that would work". Claims in the courtroom she had no idea about renter's insurance. Just who did she think they'd get one over on? JM, the insurance company? He really didnt need to bring her if he wanted to win, she lost the case for him with her big mouth. Her 15 minutes and cut!
the defendants are bad liars
Why is JM disrespecting hard working men?
She gives the vibes of a Karen-in-Training
Why her eyes wide open like that.
You could easily discern that the female plantiff was excessively striving to sow confusion and disorder in order to appear more credible, but this tactic failed when she attempted to feign ignorance and employ the stereotypical "dumb blonde" approach by pretending to be clueless about insurance matters. 🤔The plaintiff hesitated to contact the moving company because they had been exceptionally pleasant, which seemed like a valid reason for not immediately reaching out to them upon discovering that her TV was damaged. 🤥While this reasoning may not be logical, it is still discernible. She is the type of individual who understands her partner well, so she eagerly intervened in an attempt to sway the judge into believing the fabricated tale. 🙄Fortunately, the judge astutely saw through the deception from a psychological perspective and recognized that she was being manipulated, especially given the lack of evidence from the plaintiffs. The defendant appeared more sincere rather naturally.
I don't see whats so ridiculous about calling renters insurance. The people commenting on here souud like home owners who have no clue how renters insurance works. I have had renters insurance for over 20 years now. They tell you to call them first usually if there is an issue with movers and/or moving. I think the plaintiff did the right thing. The Judge is out of touch with having renters insurance and also people compleatly understanding everything with insurance. I think the plaintiffs should have won.
I wouldn't hire those movers if they paid me and bought me a Tesla
She annoys me ..
If her voice is this annoying when she talks I wonder how she sings..
OMG the plaintiff she is so EXTRA!!!
The mover sounds like a liar to me.
I would have wanted to see the tvs before I load them it just looks like they were hiding something on one of the tv because that one was broken and plaintiff voice was so annoying
I actually believe the plaintiffs. I believe the movers accidently damaged the TV. I believe the plaintiffs (mainly the woman) is younger and doesn't know how renters insurance works. She thought they could cover it and when it was denied decided to go after the moving company. People don't always have an ulterior motive. Sometimes, they just are ignorant and simply don't know. But just my take on the case.
Not about this case, but I hate how movers conduct business.... i have never known of not one, who will take responsiblity for damage. Weasles, imo.
She’s a artist all right. A CON ARTIST
I thought the plaintiff was a woman till he started talking
LADY PLAINTIFF IS ANNYING AF GET OUT!! U R NOT A RECORDING ARTIST EITHER!!!
I believe the plaintiffs
Here here
I dont think there was anything wrong with asking renters insurance to pay. I dont think that implies sneaky guilt. I think that judge was wrong again!
90th
🤣🤣
99th 😂😂😂
@@bhornannawindeedeigh5007 144th
Judge Milan was rude you don't entertain and asked the female plaintiff a question and two than automatically go over the other side and switch back as if she the lady wasn't in the mist of speaking to the issue. smh and to each there own some will like her and others the manager for the moving company why confuse passion for annoying she is herself nobody else and likes things done a certain vs out of whack and everything should be talked about, understand and documented before moving anything from the home is my advise for the defendants in this case despite the win
I like the female plaintiff a lot. She is attractive & has a lot of passion. She would be a lot of fun in a relationship.
Best of luck! Most of us can't stand her voice.
Also to have 10+ kids
@@roepau This is 2024. Only if you want 10+ kids.
She yelled at a detailer for doing the same thing, but he wasn't yelling. She felt he was making her nervous. She told him to sit down. Oh, how she treats people differently!!!
Second