In Rig Veda River Saraswati is mentioned as a mighty river of immense width.. this description matches with its archeological & topographical timeline of 50,000+ years... which is the actual timeline of our Vedic, Sanatan & Hindu Sanskriti & civilization..
You are the Offspring of Cro-magnon Indo-European plus, some aboriginal New Guinea or Australian, 75,000 years ago. Cro-magnon, is the grandfather of the Aryans. I believe you are the people who populated the world of Rh+. [Out of India, not Africa].
The aryans were a nomadic tribe or tribes Dr. Bisht until they began to settle down in villages or grams or forts. Most populations were nomadic in most parts of the world at this period and the aryas were no different. The ICv was completely different. It was a magnificent and prosperous civilization that contributed to the rest of the world but it disappeared in time. The aryas never occupied it . They opened their own settlements and began an urban life.
There is an inconsistency here with the Indian historians , here , where they are describing the Indus civilization. The IVC do not have a language only scripts. The use of the RigVedic language to describe the IVC civilization is in a sense inoperable and insensible to use for a ruined civilization. Since there is not an IVC language to describe the life and history of this IVC, it would be most inaccurate to use the RigVedic one. The lack of a Harappan language has plagued Indian historians and others outside India for generations mow. Until. a Roseta Stone is found to decipher the language. The problem will remain as it were thousands of years ago. Strange how a magnificent and prosperous civilization as the IVC which has given India such a rich history disappeared without a spoken language in ancient times leaving us only script as a testament to its brilliance.
Again , the Aryas were mainly a fire or cremation burial people and hardly used funerary practices.The IVC were cemetery burial custom and their civilization was dotted with graves.Again, there is no evidence of this being written or carved on the seals or scripts. The Rigvedic .left plenty of this in the religious and cultural practices.
No Dr. Bisht. Aryans were not from the IVC. The aryans were nomadic and the IVC Harappans were city dwellers.Further, what was the name of India before the IVC civilization and during the IVC civilization. Dr. Bisht, when the aryans came to northern India the IVC was in ruins..Climate changes and earth movements had destroyed its natural order. If the IVC were destroyed by the nomadic , then its possible. These ancient nomadic were destroyers of these ancient civilizations throughout the world. Not only India.
In Rig Veda River Saraswati is mentioned as a mighty river of immense width.. this description matches with its archeological & topographical timeline of 50,000+ years... which is the actual timeline of our Vedic, Sanatan & Hindu Sanskriti & civilization..
Very informative and must hear for all students of indology
It was a very good information given by Dr RSBisht However it was difficult to follow with our a hand out. Please published them Thanks
Namaste amazing talk !!
Thanks for sharing your knowledge sir. Is any research still happening on pre harappan script?
nace
You are the Offspring of Cro-magnon Indo-European plus, some aboriginal New Guinea or Australian, 75,000 years ago. Cro-magnon, is the grandfather of the Aryans. I believe you are the people who populated the world of Rh+. [Out of India, not Africa].
The aryans were a nomadic tribe or tribes Dr. Bisht until they began to settle down in villages or grams or forts. Most populations were nomadic in most parts of the world at this period and the aryas were no different. The ICv was completely different. It was a magnificent and prosperous civilization that contributed to the rest of the world but it disappeared in time. The aryas never occupied it . They opened their own settlements and began an urban life.
There is an inconsistency here with the Indian historians , here , where they are describing the Indus civilization. The IVC do not have a language only scripts. The use of the RigVedic language to describe the IVC civilization is in a sense inoperable and insensible to use for a ruined civilization. Since there is not an IVC language to describe the life and history of this IVC, it would be most inaccurate to use the RigVedic one. The lack of a Harappan language has plagued Indian historians and others outside India for generations mow. Until. a Roseta Stone is found to decipher the language. The problem will remain as it were thousands of years ago. Strange how a magnificent and prosperous civilization as the IVC which has given India such a rich history disappeared without a spoken language in ancient times leaving us only script as a testament to its brilliance.
Again , the Aryas were mainly a fire or cremation burial people and hardly used funerary practices.The IVC were cemetery burial custom and their civilization was dotted with graves.Again, there is no evidence of this being written or carved on the seals or scripts. The Rigvedic .left plenty of this in the religious and cultural practices.
No Dr. Bisht. Aryans were not from the IVC. The aryans were nomadic and the IVC Harappans were city dwellers.Further, what was the name of India before the IVC civilization and during the IVC civilization. Dr. Bisht, when the aryans came to northern India the IVC was in ruins..Climate changes and earth movements had destroyed its natural order. If the IVC were destroyed by the nomadic , then its possible. These ancient nomadic were destroyers of these ancient civilizations throughout the world. Not only India.