Jordan Peterson discusses 'The Voice' on Triple J
Вставка
- Опубліковано 19 вер 2023
- LIVE SHOWS |Australian Live Tour 2023: www.neelkolhatkar.com/tickets
COMEDY UNTAMED | Regular lineup shows in Sydney, Melbourne, Brisbane, Geelong and Newcastle: www.comedyuntamed.com/
$3X CELLS| open.spotify.com/show/32dp6Bz...
KRUSH | Use the code 'Neel' for 40% off: krushorganics.com/
Insta: @neelkolhatkar
Facebook: Neel Kolhatkar
Tik Tok: @neelkolhatkar - Розваги
Neel, I think you just need to do a sketch called “If Jordan Peterson Was a Leprechaun”😂
That's just what he's doing right now haha
As soon as Neel's Petersen impression started with the voice crack, I lost it. Great work Neel!
The writing here is incredible
The hand gestures are so on point.
‘Bit of discriminaaayyshhh’ 😂
Lol the Amber Heard picture in the back is a good dig, those chodes at the hack were for sure Heard supporters
I burst out laughing at the first line. Your impression is so on point. Wow, mindblowing. I laughed so much I couldn't feel my cheeks.
Petition to make this a regular segment.
Absolutely Brilliant!!
Accurate representation of the discussion on the voice debate.
Two people talking about something else, neither really listening to or understanding the other person talking.
The voice debate is retarded. Everyone has a voice, aboriginal people are members of parliament. It was purely made to cause an argument amongst Australian people. Australia day is a shameful day because of an historical event none of us experienced. Yes terrible th9ngs happened like the stolen generation etc. But it isn't happening now and the same trend is going in in the U.S about slavery reparations!
Terrible thing slavery but no one alive today deserves payments for previous misdoings!
This planet is fucked and the sooner people stop breeding the better.
"first nation's bottoms" that's exactly what they're like. holy...
You got it with the radical left, young men, terrible history, and bible references. Good stuff man.
I haven’t laughed this hard at a skit in forever
More like Indian Jordan Peterson. 😅
Jordan Patelson
@@Marqan you, sir, are the new king lobster 🦞
Indian-Irish
This was hilarious 😂
Lol. You do a really good impression of him. Well done!
Hippie relating to Jordan Peterson is the sketch I didn't know that I needed.
Thanks for the laugh Neel. This was good as. Very realistic! 🤣🤣
Stellar work
''Reffo'' 🤣
Triple J: Two or more people talking, but not having a conversation. Followed by what we were told to play.
more like triple gay
I like your Irish take on JP
Oh my god this is brilliant!
Hilarious!
How on Erf did you get JBP on the show?
Pansexual here, Peter Pan...🤣
Amazing
brilliant
That's the funniest thing I"ve seen this year. Spot on mate. Too bloody good! Loved how Jordan never went off script while the host went just about everywhere
This is great
brilliant 🤣
God, I love this :3.
👌
The Voice in 3 min - go
Funny!!
😂😂😂
as if this would ever happen 😂
this would be hilarious if there was even a 1% chance triple j would have jordan on hack
There is one adamant question I have pertaining to the voice, why should any specific culture and heritage be acknowledged in a country's constitution, over freedom of speech for every single citizen within that country? I agree something needs to be done, and recognition needs to be present. So why do new laws need to come into place to help these communities? Surly, the government already has the authority and resources to get involved.
I'm going to make this explanation the least 'Triple J' like I can.
The voice is more like giving the indigenous people a seat at the free speech table. Historically, they haven't been able to speak to the government to the same level as various other interest groups have such as business lobbies and unions. The reason they haven't to is due to a combination of historical oppression and the fragmented nature of the indigenous collective (i.e. their various nations across the country working independently from one another). This has resulted in the poorest of socioeconomic outcomes for indigenous people as the attempted government interventions have been ill-advised and resulted in no improvement economically for indigenous people. What the voice will do is provide a permanent dialogue between the government and indigenous people to provide specific advice for policies aimed at improving indigenous lives. I emphasise that the government DOES NOT HAVE TO LISTEN TO THE VOICE, and probably won't half the time, for better or for worse. The government will judge the policy proposal on its merits. So there is no threat of indigenous people establishing a tyranny, as puppet masters over the government and overthrow the individual freedoms of other Australians. What having the voice constitutionally enshrined will do is prevent future coalition governments from abolishing it and breaking the dialogue, as they have in the past. And yes, we have had non-constitutionally enshrined voice-esque bodies under the Whitlam, Hawke and Keating governments. They were all abolished by the Liberals every time before they could produce any tangible effect, to protect their mining donors interests and as well as to keep Australia divided for political purposes.
Given that the indigenous people originally lived on this continent of ours, they are entitled to receive our help so they can continue to live on their homeland. The voice will not elevate the indigenous people above the freedoms of others. It is a low risk, low-to-high reward scenario. What is guaranteed however is that under the current system in which we manage the Indigenous people's welfare, things will not improve.
@@thomasbrindle7308 We all speak to the government with our votes. We all have one. Then there's the level of representation of Aboriginals in both houses of parliament, which is actually an over-representation according to the demographics of Australia. They don't need any special powers carved out specially for them. No one should have any extra rights to be heard in our democracy over anyone else, to have such provisions for anyone based on race is unequivocably racist by definition.
If the indigenous community is already fractured, then having this committe does not guarantee unity. Which view points will they support over other indigenous view points? Plus these people aren’t elected , so there is no guarantee who they support ta all. It adds more beurocratic tape and costs only. What stops them from being lobbied and bribed? What about the dozens of already present organisations that voice indigenous views, this just wastes money. Voting is mandatory already so every voice is heard already. Plus what solutions will this committee propose that has not already been advocated or tried? Just because your indigenous does not mean you represent all indigenous indigenous groups or can propose laws that benefit them better than current ones.
I love JBP but this was hilarious
totes
NAILED THAT ONE! Sad how TJ has gone in that they say so much of nothing whilst sounding so wise and intellectual.....All by design to slowly dumb down the masses....Funny as F skit tho!
It’s a scam
You impersonated JP so well you actually made the same valid points he might have made!