She is genuine and true historian bcz all the hindu community proved to hate she is amazing.problem is that our government control by so called baman who dont want that true history known bt people
Indians were very much afraid of the word chronocology. If the history word. Favour and nepotism the gained of ad/bc.unfavourable history untold. Right from rk to Mahabharata. And we are in dark now. As the Indians were never been same cult although in same regions. Undue competition within the cults derived the uncertainty of history. So the history is defeated one in India.we unconsciously pronouce the Hidustan or India (india written word)but the word Bharat gives the sanctity of mind and nobility.ref -shruti,shastra,also smriti shastra including languages with sanskaras.
megasthenes never mention Brahmana and shramana ..its only on assumption that Megasthenes came to court of Chandragupta MAURYA which is not the case; it was Chandragupta I OF IMEPRIAL Guptas as per Indias own Chronology.
@@balendumanitripathi9597 you here totally missed the point ...he mentioned 7 classes though he never reference it as Brahman..... The point is he never mentioned the pair Brahman n shramana as two different classes or religious orders or denomination.....which was the classification post Buddhist times in Mauryan times in 1500_1400 BCE period where Indian traditions places the early mauryan dynasty.... He instead talks in totally different religious situation. As wud bevin much later times...so no talk by megasthenes of Brahman and shramana ie vedic orthodox vs budh jain n ajivikas as shramana..... But in 300 bce that situation no longer exists..and almost present day practices now current in Hinduism has come and so he speaks of Krishna worshipper like surasenu ppl of mathura..siva worshipper while relating all these to Greek counterparts....and is totally NIL m NULL on Buddhists....it wyd not have been so if Mauryas belonged to his times....
This Urban Naxal lady is distoring each and every fact ,,,she said about 7 castes but does not explain it because she has her agenda to defame India ,, the 7 castes were not based on religious basis
She is not supporting the fact of 7 castes...she herself is saying that this doesn't fit ...Plz listen carefully before you comment on someone who has put all her life in researches..😄
megasthenes never mention Brahmana and shramana ..its only on assumption that Megasthenes came to court of Chandragupta MAURYA which is not the case; it was Chandragupta I OF IMEPRIAL Guptas as per Indias own Chronology.
@@chandrareddy4392ndica book is lost only citations in other book is available so very limited knowledge on what book contains, this lady is running train on ganga river😅
Patnajali only. He is not only known for systematising yoga sutras, but he also wrote Mahabhashya, which is a commentary on Panini's ashtadhyayi. Patanjali also wrote many other texts in samkhya philosophy.
Prof Thapar tells history like my grandmother told bed time stories. 10% Fact +50% modifying facts +40% made up
She ain't no prof, she is a distorter of Indian history!!
Al berouni was great mathematician and astronomer. Rightly said by romila thapar mam she is great historian jn indian history
Best to hear history from the oppressed, dalits, to get a balanced view..
Is she dalit?
@@dustudent1637 She is the most shitiest historian in history of India who tries to break up India's history
@@techintern5566
Yes I know she is shitty.
@@dustudent1637 Grt beware of these leftist
@@techintern5566
I know.
She is genuine and true historian bcz all the hindu community proved to hate she is amazing.problem is that our government control by so called baman who dont want that true history known bt people
Indians were very much afraid of the word chronocology. If the history word. Favour and nepotism the gained of ad/bc.unfavourable history untold. Right from rk to Mahabharata. And we are in dark now. As the Indians were never been same cult although in same regions. Undue competition within the cults derived the uncertainty of history. So the history is defeated one in India.we unconsciously pronouce the Hidustan or India (india written word)but the word Bharat gives the sanctity of mind and nobility.ref -shruti,shastra,also smriti shastra including languages with sanskaras.
She is fabulous!
Varna is not caste Ms.Naxal
She ia not a naxal ahinis from anti idol worship gang she is a jeuas freak
But is reflected its perception
बहुत ही सार्थक कथन 👍
She twists history according to her whims. Indian History is way too different than scholars present it. It's far more glorious.
Anastasia Sultana Communists story dont want to treat as history
megasthenes never mention Brahmana and shramana ..its only on assumption that Megasthenes came to court of Chandragupta MAURYA which is not the case; it was Chandragupta I OF IMEPRIAL Guptas as per Indias own Chronology.
@@sachin737 yes I was also reading this ,, these western people think India has kept no historical records of its own
@@sachin737 magashthnes clearly mention brahman yagya and 7 category of verna read carefully ,don't be baised by fraudulence
@@balendumanitripathi9597 you here totally missed the point ...he mentioned 7 classes though he never reference it as Brahman.....
The point is he never mentioned the pair Brahman n shramana as two different classes or religious orders or denomination.....which was the classification post Buddhist times in Mauryan times in 1500_1400 BCE period where Indian traditions places the early mauryan dynasty....
He instead talks in totally different religious situation. As wud bevin much later times...so no talk by megasthenes of Brahman and shramana ie vedic orthodox vs budh jain n ajivikas as shramana.....
But in 300 bce that situation no longer exists..and almost present day practices now current in Hinduism has come and so he speaks of Krishna worshipper like surasenu ppl of mathura..siva worshipper while relating all these to Greek counterparts....and is totally NIL m NULL on Buddhists....it wyd not have been so if Mauryas belonged to his times....
This Urban Naxal lady is distoring each and every fact ,,,she said about 7 castes but does not explain it because she has her agenda to defame India ,, the 7 castes were not based on religious basis
She is not supporting the fact of 7 castes...she herself is saying that this doesn't fit ...Plz listen carefully before you comment on someone who has put all her life in researches..😄
megasthenes never mention Brahmana and shramana ..its only on assumption that Megasthenes came to court of Chandragupta MAURYA which is not the case; it was Chandragupta I OF IMEPRIAL Guptas as per Indias own Chronology.
He has come to the court of Chandragupta Maurya towards the end of his reign ugta share mentioning.
@@chandrareddy4392ndica book is lost only citations in other book is available so very limited knowledge on what book contains, this lady is running train on ganga river😅
Megasthanes book indica is lost and only its citation in other books are available this lady telling very false narrative
Haaha but its commentaries are available
patanjali or Panini?
Patnajali only. He is not only known for systematising yoga sutras, but he also wrote Mahabhashya, which is a commentary on Panini's ashtadhyayi. Patanjali also wrote many other texts in samkhya philosophy.
Patanjali was a grammarian. Panini gave the devnagari script.
Brahmans or Banans??
Berai mon in bengali.
Sayad paidali hi jana podhega.
KABHI khabhi karna podta HAI.
Don’t study from this daayan!!
Naxal
liar liar.
Tujhe to...
Pataljali righting sankrti she ia stuoid